1.
Carr, E.H., Cox, M.: The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 1919-1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations. Palgrave, Basingstoke (2001).
2.
Mearsheimer, J.J.: E.H. Carr vs. Idealism: The Battle Rages On. International Relations. 19, 139–152 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117805052810.
3.
Paul, T.V.: Recasting Statecraft - International Relations and Strategies of Peaceful Change, http://www.tvpaul.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/ISA_Presidential_Address.pdf, (2016).
4.
Howe, P.: The Utopian Realism of E. H. Carr. Review of International Studies. 20, 277–297 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500118078.
5.
Morgenthau, H.: The Political Science of E. H. Carr. World Politics. 1, 127–134 (1948). https://doi.org/10.2307/2009162.
6.
Wilson, P.: The Myth of the ‘First Great Debate’. Review of International Studies. 24, 1–15 (1998).
7.
Ikenberry, G.J.: Liberal Internationalism 3.0: America and the Dilemmas of Liberal World Order. Perspectives on Politics. 7, 71–87 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592709090112.
8.
Keohane, R.O., Nye, J.S.: Power and Interdependence. HarperCollins, [S.l.] (1989).
9.
Keohane, R.O., Nye, J.S.: Power and Interdependence Revisited. International Organization. 41, (1987). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027661.
10.
Doyle, M.W.: Liberalism and World Politics. American Political Science Review. 80, 1151–1169 (1986). https://doi.org/10.2307/1960861.
11.
Deudney, D., Ikenberry, G.J.: The Nature and Sources of Liberal International Order. Review Of International Studies. 25, 179–196 (1999).
12.
Doyle, M.W.: Liberalism and World Politics. American Political Science Review. 80, 1151–1169 (1986). https://doi.org/10.2307/1960861.
13.
Fukuyama, F.: The End of History? The National Interest. 3–18 (1989).
14.
Ikenberry, G.J.: Liberal Internationalism 3.0: America and the Dilemmas of Liberal World Order. Perspectives on Politics. 7, 71–87 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592709090112.
15.
Slaughter, A.-M.: A New World Order. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J. (2004).
16.
Moravcsik, A.: Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics. International Organization. 52, (1997).
17.
Zacher, M.W., Matthew, R.A.: Liberal International Theory: Common Threads, Divergent Strands. In: Controversies in International Relations Theory: Realism and the Neo-Liberal Challenge. pp. 107–150. Macmillan, Basingstoke (1995).
18.
Wilson, W.: The World Must be Made Safe for Democracy: The Fourteen Points. In: Mingst, K.A. and Snyder (eds.), J.L. (eds.) Essential Readings in World Politics. pp. 4–6. W.W. Norton & Company, New York (2014).
19.
Kant, I.: An Answer to the Question: ‘What is Enlightenment?’. In: Kant’s Political Writings. Cambridge University Press, London (1970).
20.
Kant, I.: Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch. In: Kant’s Political Writings. Cambridge University Press, London (1970).
21.
Grieco, J.M.: Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism. In: Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate. pp. 116–142. Columbia University Press, New York (1993).
22.
Baldwin, D.A.: Neoliberalism, Neorealism, and World Politics. In: Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate. pp. 3–28. Columbia University Press, New York (1993).
23.
Hoffmann, S.: Liberalism and International Affairs. In: Janus and Minerva: Essays in the Theory and Practice of International Politics. pp. 394–417. , Boulder (1987).
24.
Doyle, M.W.: Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 12, 205–235 (1983).
25.
Genest, M.A.: Conflict and Cooperation: Evolving Theories of International Relations. Thomson/Wadsworth, Belmont, CA (2004).
26.
Kegley, C.W., Blanton, S.L.: World Politics: Trend and Transformation. Wadsworth Cengage Learning, Boston, Mass (2011).
27.
Jackson, R., Sorensen, G.: Introduction to International Relations: Theories and Approaches. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2003).
28.
Morgenthau, H.J.: A Realist Theory of International Politics. In: Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. McGraw-Hill Higher Education, Boston (2006).
29.
Morgenthau, H.J.: The Balance of Power. In: Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. McGraw-Hill Higher Education, Boston (2006).
30.
Morgenthau, H.J.: Different Methods of the Balance of Power. In: Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. McGraw-Hill Higher Education, Boston (2006).
31.
Forde, S.: Varieties of Realism: Thucydides and Machiavelli. The Journal of Politics. 54, 372–393 (1992). https://doi.org/10.2307/2132031.
32.
Waltz, K.N.: Man, the State, and War: A Theoretical Analysis. Columbia University Press, New York (2001).
33.
Morgenthau, H.J.: Scientific Man vs. Power Politics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1974).
34.
Niebuhr, R.: Moral Man and Immoral Society: A Study in Ethics and Politics. Continuum, London (2005).
35.
Claude, I.L.: Power and International Relations. Random House, New York (2012).
36.
Aron, R.: Peace and War: A Theory of International Relations. Weidenfeld & Nicolson, London (1966).
37.
Palan, R.P., Blair, B.M.: On the Idealist Origins of the Realist Theory of International Relations. Review of International Studies. 19, (1993). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500118273.
38.
Viotti, P.R., Kauppi, M.V.: Realism: The State, Power and the Balance of Power. In: International Relations Theory: Realism, Pluralism, Globalism, and Beyond. pp. 35–67. Allyn and Bacon, Boston (1999).
39.
Carr, E.H.: The Nature of Politics. In: International Relations Theory: Realism, Pluralism, Globalism, and Beyond. pp. 562–566. Allyn and Bacon, Boston (1999).
40.
Dougherty, J.E., Pfaltzgraff, R.L.: Contending Theories of International Relations: A Comprehensive Survey. Longman, New York (2001).
41.
Vasquez, J.A.: The Power of Power Politics: From Classical Realism to Neotraditionalism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998).
42.
Haslam, J.: No Virtue Like Necessity: Realist Thought in International Relations Since Machiavelli. Yale University Press, New Haven (2002).
43.
Smith, M.J.: Realist Thought From Weber to Kissinger. London (1986).
44.
Doyle, M.W.: Thucydidean Realism. Review of International Studies. 16, (1990). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500112483.
45.
Garst, D.: Thucydides and Neorealism. International Studies Quarterly. 33, 3–27 (1989).
46.
Bagby, L.M.J.: The Use and Abuse of Thucydides in International Relations. International Organization. 48, (1994). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300000849.
47.
Thucydides: The Melian Dialogue. In: History of the Peloponnesian war. pp. 400–408. Penguin, Harmondsworth (1954).
48.
Thucydides: The Melian Dialogue. In: Classics of International Relations. pp. 84–90. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J (1996).
49.
Thucydides, Crawley, R.: History of the Peloponnesian War, http://people.ucalgary.ca/~vandersp/Courses/texts/thucydi1.html.
50.
Macchiavell, N.: Excerpts from ‘The Prince’ in Classics of International Relations. In: Classics of International Relations. pp. 15–20. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J (1996).
51.
Machiavelli, N., Marriott, W.K.: The Prince, https://web.archive.org/web/20060101054818/http://www.ilt.columbia.edu/publications/machiavelli.html.
52.
Hobbes, T.: The Natural Conditions of Mankind. In: International Relations Theory: Realism, Pluralism, Globalism, and Beyond. pp. 94–98. Allyn and Bacon, Boston (1999).
53.
Gilpin, R.G.: The Richness of the Tradition of Political Realism. International Organization. 38, (1984). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300026710.
54.
Gilpin, R.G.: No One Loves a Political Realist. Security Studies. 5, 3–26 (1996).
55.
Herz, J.H.: Power Politics and World Organization. The American Political Science Review. 36, (1942). https://doi.org/10.2307/1949064.
56.
H. Herz, J.: Rise and Demise of The Territorial State. World Politics. 9, 473–493 (1957).
57.
Hoffmann, S.: An American Social Science: International Relations. Daedalus. 106, 41–60 (1977).
58.
Hoffmann, S.: An American Social Science: International Relations. In: Janus and Minerva: Essays in the Theory and Practice of International Politics. pp. 219–221. Westview, Boulder (1987).
59.
James, A.: The Realism of Realism: The State and the Study of International Relations. Review of International Studies. 15, (1989). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500112847.
60.
Wolfers, A.: Discord and Collaboration: Essays on International Politics. Johns Hopkins University Press, London (1962).
61.
Waltz, K.N.: Theory of International Politics. McGraw-Hill, London (1979).
62.
Keohane, R.O.: Neorealism and Its Critics. Columbia University Press, New York (1986).
63.
Rosecrance, R.: Long Cycle Theory and International Relations. International Organization. 41, 283–301 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027478.
64.
Dunne, T., Kurki, M., Smith, S. eds: International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2016).
65.
Powell, R.: Anarchy in International Relations Theory: The Neorealist-Neoliberal Debate. International Organization. 48, (1994). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300028204.
66.
Modelski, G.: The Long Cycle of Global Politics and the Nation-State. Comparative Studies in Society and History. 20, (1978). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417500008914.
67.
Krauthammer, C.: The Unipolar Moment. In: Rethinking America’s Security: Beyond Cold War to New World Order. pp. 313–344. Norton, New York (1992).
68.
Mastanduno, M.: Preserving the Unipolar Moment: Realist Theories and U.S. Grand Strategy After the Cold War. International Security. 21, (1997). https://doi.org/10.2307/2539283.
69.
Keohane, R.O.: After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J. (2005).
70.
Keohane, R.O.: After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J. (1984).
71.
Mearsheimer, J.J.: The False Promise of International Institutions. International Security. 19, (1994). https://doi.org/10.2307/2539078.
72.
Legro, J.W., Moravcsik, A.: Is Anybody Still a Realist? International Security. 24, 5–55 (1999).
73.
Jervis, R.: Realism, Neoliberalism, and Cooperation: Understanding the Debate. International Security. 24, 42–63 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1162/016228899560040.
74.
Gilpin, R.: The Rise of American Hegemony. In: Britain 1846-1914 and the United States 1941-2001. Ashgate Pub Ltd (2002).
75.
Gilpin, R.: The Rise of American Hegemony. In: Two Hegemonies: Britain 1846-1914 and the United States 1941-2001. pp. 165–182. Ashgate Publishing Ltd., Aldershot (2002).
76.
Grunberg, I.: Exploring the "Myth” of Hegemonic Stability. International Organization. 44, (1990). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300035372.
77.
Ruggie, J.G.: International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order. International Organization. 36, (1982). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300018993.
78.
Milner, H.: International Theories of Cooperation Among Nations: Strengths and Weaknesses. World Politics. 44, 466–496 (1992). https://doi.org/10.2307/2010546.
79.
Simmons, B.A., Hopkins, D.J.: The Constraining Power of International Treaties: Theory and Methods. American Political Science Review. 99, (2005). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055405051920.
80.
Kindleberger, C.P.: Dominance and Leadership in the International Economy: Exploitation, Public Goods, and Free Rides. International Studies Quarterly. 25, (1981). https://doi.org/10.2307/2600355.
81.
Snidal, D.: The Limits of Hegemonic Stability Theory. International Organization. 39, (1985). https://doi.org/10.1017/S002081830002703X.
82.
Lake, D.A.: Leadership, Hegemony, and the International Economy: Naked Emperor or Tattered Monarch With Potential? International Studies Quarterly. 37, (1993).
83.
McKeown, T.J.: Hegemonic Stability Theory and 19th Century Tariff Levels in Europe. International Organization. 37, (1983). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300004203.
84.
Bull, H.: The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2012).
85.
Edkins, J., Zehfuss, M.: Generalising the International. Review of International Studies. 31, (2005). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210505006583.
86.
Dunne, T.: International Society: Theoretical Promises Fulfilled? Cooperation and Conflict. 30, 125–154 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836795030002002.
87.
Bellamy, A.J.: International Society and Its Critics. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2005).
88.
Bellamy, A.J.: International Society and Its Critics. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2004).
89.
Bull, H.: Order vs. Justice in International Society. Political Studies. 19, 269–283 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1971.tb00674.x.
90.
Hurrell, A.: Order and Justice in International Relations: What is at Stake? In: Order and Justice in International Relations. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2003).
91.
Bellamy, A.J.: International Society and Its Critics. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2005).
92.
Bellamy, A.J.: International Society and Its Critics. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2004).
93.
Brown, C.: International Theory and International Society: The Viability of the Middle Way? Review of International Studies. 21, (1995). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500117619.
94.
Brown, C.: International Theory and International Society: The Viability of the Middle Way? Review of International Studies. 21, (1995). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500117619.
95.
Linklater, A.: The Transformation of Political Community: E. H. Carr, Critical Theory and International Relations. Review Of International Studies. 23, (1997).
96.
Lynch, C.: E.H. Carr, International Relations Theory, and the Societal Origins of International Legal Norms. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 23, 589–619 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298940230030801.
97.
Vincent, R.J.: Hedley Bull and Order in International Politics. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 17, 195–213 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298880170020701.
98.
Buzan, B.: From International to World Society?: English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004).
99.
Buzan, B.: From International to World Society?: English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004).
100.
Grotius, H., Neff, S.C.: Hugo Grotius on the Law of War and Peace. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2012).
101.
Grotius, H., Campbell, A.C.: On the Laws of War and Peace. , London (1814).
102.
Bull, H.: The Importance of Grotius in the Study of International Relations. In: Hugo Grotius and International Relations. pp. 65–94. Clarendon, Oxford (1990).
103.
Linklater, A.: Marxism. In: Theories of International Relations. pp. 110–136. Palgrave Macmillan (2005).
104.
Gilpin, R., Gilpin, J.M.: The Political Economy of International Relations. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J. (1987).
105.
Gills, B.K.: Historical Materialism and International Relations Theory. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 16, 265–270 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298870160020301.
106.
Marx, K., Engels, F., Tucker, R.C.: Economic and Philosophic Manuscript of 1844. In: The Marx-Engels Reader. pp. 66–125. Norton, New York (1978).
107.
Marx, K., Engels, F., Tucker, R.C.: Wage, Labour and Capital. In: The Marx-Engels Reader. pp. 203–217. Norton, New York (1978).
108.
Linklater, A.: Realism, Marxism and Critical International Theory. Review of International Studies. 12, (1986). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500113865.
109.
Maclean, J.: Marxism and International Relations: A Strange Case of Mutual Neglect. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 17, 295–319 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298880170021201.
110.
Burnham, P.: Open Marxism and Vulgar International Political Economy. Review of International Political Economy. 1, 221–231 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1080/09692299408434277.
111.
Marx, K., Tucker, R.C.: Economic and Philosophic Manuscript of 1844. In: The Marx-Engels Reader. pp. 66–125. Norton, New York (1978).
112.
Marx, K., Engels, F., Tucker, R.C.: Wage, Labour and Capital. In: The Marx-Engels Reader. pp. 203–217. Norton, New York (1978).
113.
Marx, K., Tucker, R.C.: Theories of Surplus Value. In: The Marx-Engels Reader. pp. 443–468. Norton, New York (1978).
114.
Lenin, V.I.: Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism : A Popular Outline. Foreign Languages Press, Peking (1973).
115.
Rosenberg, J.: Isaac Deutscher and the Lost History of International Relations. New Left Review. (1996).
116.
Berki, R.N.: On Marxian Thought and the Problem of International Relations. World Politics. 24, 80–105 (1971). https://doi.org/10.2307/2009707.
117.
Burnham, P.: The Communist Manifesto as International Relations Theory. In: The Communist Manifesto: New Interpretations. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh (1998).
118.
Halliday, F.: A Necessary Encounter: Historical Materialism and International Relations. In: Rethinking International Relations. Macmillan, Basingstoke (1994).
119.
Gamble, A.: Marxism After Communism: Beyond Realism and Historicism. Review Of International Studies. 25, 27–144 (1999).
120.
Cutler, C.: Locating ‘Authority’ in the Global Political Economy. International Studies Quarterly. 43, 59–81 (1999).
121.
MacLean, J.: Marxist Epistemology, Explanations of ‘Change’ and the Study of International Relations. In: Change and the Study of International Relations: The Evaded Dimension. pp. 46–67. St. Martin’s Press, New York (1981).
122.
Linklater, A.: Realism, Marxism and Critical International Theory. Review of International Studies. 12, 301–312 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500113865.
123.
Wallerstein, I.: The Rise and Future Demise of the World Capitalist System: Concepts for Comparative Analysis. Comparative Studies in Society and History. 16, 387–415 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417500007520.
124.
Gill, S., Law, D.: Marxism and the World System. In: The Global Political Economy: Perspectives, Problems, and Policies. pp. 54–70. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore (1988).
125.
Gill, S.R., Law, D.: Global Hegemony and the Structural Power of Capital. International Studies Quarterly. 33, 475–199 (1989).
126.
Cox, R.W.: Social Forces, States and World Order. In: Neorealism and Its Critics. pp. 204–254. Columbia University Press, New York (1986).
127.
Lenin, V.I.: Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism : A Popular Outline. Foreign Languages Press, Peking (1973).
128.
Lenin, V.I.: Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism: A Popular Outline, https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1916/imp-hsc/.
129.
Wallerstein, I.: The Modern World-System Vol. 1: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century. Academic, New York (1974).
130.
Wallerstein, I.: The Three Instances of Hegemony in the History of the Capitalist World-Economy. Comparative Sociology. 24, 100–108 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1163/156854283X00071.
131.
Chase-Dunn, C.: Interstate System and Capitalist World-Economy: One Logic or Two? International Studies Quarterly. 25, 19–42 (1981). https://doi.org/10.2307/2600209.
132.
Santos, T.D.: The Structure of Dependence. American Economic Review. 60, 231–236 (1970).
133.
Merrington, J.: Theory and Practice in Gramsci’s Marxism. In: Western Marxism: A Critical Reader. pp. 140–175. Verso, London (1978).
134.
Cox, Robert.W.: Gramsci, Hegemony and International Relations : An Essay in Method. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 12, 162–175 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298830120020701.
135.
Germain, R.D., Kenny, M.: Engaging Gramsci: International Relations Theory and the New Gramscians. Review Of International Studies. 24, (1998).
136.
Murphy, C.N.: Understanding IR: Understanding Gramsci. Review Of International Studies. 24, (1998).
137.
Gale, F.: Cave ’Cave! Hic Dragones’ : A Neo-Gramscian Deconstruction and Reconstruction of International Regime Theory. Review of International Political Economy. 5, 252–283 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1080/096922998347561.
138.
Gill, S.: Gramsci, Historical Materialism and International Relations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1993).
139.
Gill, S.: Gramsci, Historical Materialism and International Relations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge [England] (1993).
140.
Rupert, M.: Producing Hegemony: The Politics of Mass Production and American Global Power. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1995).
141.
Morton, Adam David, B., Andreas ;, Bieler, A., Morton, A.D.: The Gordian Knot of Agency-Structure in International Relations: A Neo-Gramscian Perspective. European Journal of International Relations. 7, (2001).
142.
Reus-Smit, C.: Constructivism. In: Theories of International Relations. pp. 188–212. Palgrave Macmillan (2005).
143.
Wendt, A.: Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics. International Organization. 46, 391–425 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027764.
144.
Hopf, T.: The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory. International Security. 23, 171–200 (1998). https://doi.org/10.2307/2539267.
145.
Katzenstein, P.J.: The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics. Columbia University Press, New York (1996).
146.
Sterling-Folker, J.: Competing Paradigms or Birds of a Feather? Constructivism and Neoliberal Institutionalism Compared. International Studies Quarterly. 44, 97–119 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1111/0020-8833.00150.
147.
Krebs, R.R., Jackson, P.T.: Twisting Tongues and Twisting Arms: The Power of Political Rhetoric. European Journal of International Relations. 13, 35–66 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066107074284.
148.
Hobson, J.M.: The Enduring Place of Hierarchy in World Politics: Tracing the Social Logics of Hierarchy and Political Change. European Journal of International Relations. 11, 63–98 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066105050137.
149.
Ruggie, J.G.: What Makes the World Hang Together? Neo-Utilitarianism and the Social Constructivist Challenge. International Organization. 52, (1998).
150.
Adler, E.: The Spread of Security Communities: Communities of Practice, Self-Restraint, and NATO’s Post--Cold War Transformation. European Journal of International Relations. 14, 195–230 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066108089241.
151.
Autesserre, S.: Hobbes and the Congo: Frames, Local Violence, and International Intervention. International Organization. 63, (2009). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818309090080.
152.
Price, R., Reus-Smit, C.: Dangerous Liaisons? Critical International Theory and Constructivism. European Journal of International Relations. 4, (1998).
153.
Devetek, R.: Critical Theory. In: Theories of International Relations. pp. 137–160. Palgrave Macmillan (2005).
154.
Edkins, J.: Poststructuralism & International Relations: Bringing the Political Back In. Lynne Rienner Publishers, Boulder, Colo (1999).
155.
Foucault, M.: What Is An Author? In: The Foucault Reader. pp. 101–120. Penguin, Harmondsworth (1991).
156.
Epstein, C.: The Power of Words in International Relations: Birth of an Anti-Whaling Discourse. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass (2008).
157.
Grovogui, S.N.: Regimes of Sovereignty: International Morality and the African Condition. European Journal of International Relations. 8, 315–338 (2002).
158.
Said, E.: The Scope of Orientalism. In: Orientalism. Penguin, Harmondsworth (1991).
159.
Gusterson, H.: Nuclear Weapons and the Other in the Western Imagination. In: People of the Bomb: Portraits of America’s Nuclear Complex. pp. 21–47. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, Minn (2005).
160.
Milliken, Jennifer: The Study of Discourse in International Relations: A Critique of Research and Methods. European Journal of International Relations. 5, (1999).
161.
ÓTuathail, G.: Theorizing Practical Geopolitical Reasoning: The Case of the United States’ Response to the War in Bosnia. Political Geography. 21, 601–628 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0962-6298(02)00009-4.
162.
Campbell, D.: Political Prosaics, Transversal Politics and the Anarchical World. In: Challenging Boundaries: Global Flows, Territorial Identities. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, Minn (1996).
163.
Doty, R.L.: Foreign Policy as Social Construction: A Post-Positivist Analysis of U.S. Counterinsurgency Policy in the Philippines. International Studies Quarterly. 37, (1993). https://doi.org/10.2307/2600810.
164.
Ashley, R.K.: The Poverty of Neorealism. International Organization. 38, (1984). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300026709.
165.
Campbell, D.: Politics Without Principle: Sovereignty, Ethics, and the Narratives of the Gulf War. Lynne Rienner Publishers, Boulder, Colo (1993).
166.
der Derian, J.: ‘The Boundaries of Knowledge and Power in International Relations’ In: International/Intertextual Relations: Postmodern Readings of World Politics. In: International/Intertextual Relations: Postmodern Readings of World Politics. Lexington Books, Lexington, Mass (1989).
167.
Neumann, I.B.: The Body of the Diplomat. European Journal of International Relations. 14, 671–695 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066108097557.
168.
De Goede, M.: The Politics of Preemption and the War on Terror in Europe. European Journal of International Relations. 14, 161–185 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066107087764.
169.
Darby, P.: Pursuing the Political: A Postcolonial Rethinking of Relations International. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 33, (2004).
170.
Krishna, S.: Race, Amnesia, and the Education of International Relations. Alternatives. 26, (2001).
171.
Fanon, F., Philcox, R., Sartre, J.-P., Bhabha, H.K., West, C.: The Wretched of the Earth. Grove Press, New York (2021).
172.
Darby, P.: Reconfiguring ‘The International’ Knowledge Machines, Boundaries, and Exclusions. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political. 28, (2003).
173.
Barkawi, T., Laffey, M.: Retrieving the Imperial: Empire and International Relations. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 31, 109–127 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298020310010601.
174.
Callinicos, A.: The Actuality of Imperialism. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 31, 319–326 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298020310020601.
175.
Shaw, M.: Post-Imperial and Quasi-Imperial: State and Empire in the Global Era. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 31, 327–336 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298020310020701.
176.
Slater, D.: Post-Colonial Questions for Global Times. Review of International Political Economy. 5, 647–678 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1080/096922998347417.
177.
Ling, L.H.M.: Hegemony and the Internationalizing State: A Post‐colonial Analysis of China’s Integration Into Asian Corporatism. Review of International Political Economy. 3, 1–26 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1080/09692299608434343.
178.
McClintock, A.: The Angel of Progress: Pitfalls of the Term ‘Post-Colonialism’. Social Text. (1992). https://doi.org/10.2307/466219.
179.
Goldgeier, J.M., McFaul, M.: A Tale of Two Worlds: Core and Periphery in the Post-Cold War Era. International Organization. 46, (1992). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027788.
180.
Aydinli, E., Mathews, J.: Periphery Theorising for a Truly Internationalised Discipline: Spinning IR Theory Out of Anatolia. Review of International Studies. 34, (2008). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210508008231.
181.
True, J.: Feminism. In: Theories of International Relations. pp. 213–234. Palgrave Macmillan (2005).
182.
Tickner, J.A.: You Just Don’t Understand: Troubled Engagements Between Feminists and IR Theorists. International Studies Quarterly. 41, 611–632 (1997).
183.
Enloe, C.: Are Un Peacekeepers Real Men? and Other Post-Cold War Puzzles. In: The Morning After: Sexual Politics at the End of the Cold War. pp. 10–37. University of California Press, Berkeley (1993).
184.
Enloe, C.: Bananas Militarized and Demilitarized. In: The Morning After: Sexual Politics at the End of the Cold War. pp. 102–141. University of California Press, Berkeley (1993).
185.
Stern, M., Zalewski, M.: Feminist Fatigue(s): Reflections on Feminism and Familiar Fables of Militarisation. Review of International Studies. 35, (2009). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210509008675.
186.
Skjelsbæk, I.: Sexual Violence and War: Mapping Out a Complex Relationship. European Journal of International Relations. 7,.
187.
Enloe, C.H.: Bananas, Beaches and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics. University of California Press, Berkeley, Calif (2000).
188.
Jones, A.: Does ‘Gender’ Make the World Go Round? Feminist Critiques of International Relations. Review of International Studies. 22, (1996). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500118649.
189.
Carver, T., Cochran, M., Squires, J.: Gendering Jones: Feminisms, IRs, Masculinities. Review Of International Studies. 24, (1998).
190.
Tickner, J.A.: Hans Morgenthau’s Principles of Political Realism: A Feminist Reformulation. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 17, 429–440 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298880170030801.
191.
Brown, W.: Finding the Man in the State. Feminist Studies. 18, (1992).
192.
Youngs, G.: Feminist International Relations: A Contradiction in Terms? Or: Why Women and Gender Are Essential to Understanding the World ‘We’ Live In*. International Affairs. 80, 75–87 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2004.00367.x.
193.
Linklater, A.: Dominant and Destructive Masculinities. International Affairs. 80, (2004).
194.
Carver, T.: War of the Worlds/Invasion of the Body Snatchers. International Affairs (Royal Institute Of International Affairs 1944-). 80, (2004).
195.
Enloe, C.: ‘Gender’ Is Not Enough: The Need for a Feminist Consciousness. International Affairs. 80, (2004).
