Adler, E. 2008. ‘The Spread of Security Communities: Communities of Practice, Self-Restraint, and NATO’s Post--Cold War Transformation’. European Journal of International Relations 14(2):195–230. doi: 10.1177/1354066108089241.
Aron, Raymond. 1966. Peace and War: A Theory of International Relations. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
Ashley, Richard K. 1984. ‘The Poverty of Neorealism’. International Organization 38(02). doi: 10.1017/S0020818300026709.
Autesserre, Séverine. 2009. ‘Hobbes and the Congo: Frames, Local Violence, and International Intervention’. International Organization 63(02). doi: 10.1017/S0020818309090080.
Aydinli, Ersel, and Julie Mathews. 2008. ‘Periphery Theorising for a Truly Internationalised Discipline: Spinning IR Theory Out of Anatolia’. Review of International Studies 34(04). doi: 10.1017/S0260210508008231.
Bagby, Laurie M. Johnson. 1994. ‘The Use and Abuse of Thucydides in International Relations’. International Organization 48(01). doi: 10.1017/S0020818300000849.
Baldwin, David A. 1993. ‘Neoliberalism, Neorealism, and World Politics’. Pp. 3–28 in Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate. Vol. New Directions in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.
Barkawi, Tarak, and Mark Laffey. 2002. ‘Retrieving the Imperial: Empire and International Relations’. Millennium - Journal of International Studies 31(1):109–27. doi: 10.1177/03058298020310010601.
Bellamy, Alex J. 2004a. International Society and Its Critics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bellamy, Alex J. 2004b. International Society and Its Critics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bellamy, Alex J. 2005a. International Society and Its Critics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bellamy, Alex J. 2005b. International Society and Its Critics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Berki, R. N. 1971. ‘On Marxian Thought and the Problem of International Relations’. World Politics 24(01):80–105. doi: 10.2307/2009707.
Brown, Chris. 1995a. ‘International Theory and International Society: The Viability of the Middle Way?’ Review of International Studies 21(02). doi: 10.1017/S0260210500117619.
Brown, Chris. 1995b. ‘International Theory and International Society: The Viability of the Middle Way?’ Review of International Studies 21(02). doi: 10.1017/S0260210500117619.
Brown, Wendy. 1992. ‘Finding the Man in the State’. Feminist Studies 18(1).
Bull, Hedley. 1971. ‘Order vs. Justice in International Society’. Political Studies 19(3):269–83. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.1971.tb00674.x.
Bull, Hedley. 1990. ‘The Importance of Grotius in the Study of International Relations’. Pp. 65–94 in Hugo Grotius and International Relations. Oxford: Clarendon.
Bull, Hedley. 2012. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. 4th ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Burnham, P. 1998. ‘The Communist Manifesto as International Relations Theory’. in The Communist Manifesto: New Interpretations. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Burnham, Peter. 1994. ‘Open Marxism and Vulgar International Political Economy’. Review of International Political Economy 1(2):221–31. doi: 10.1080/09692299408434277.
Buzan, Barry. 2004a. From International to World Society?: English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation. Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Buzan, Barry. 2004b. From International to World Society?: English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Callinicos, A. 2002. ‘The Actuality of Imperialism’. Millennium - Journal of International Studies 31(2):319–26. doi: 10.1177/03058298020310020601.
Campbell, David. 1993. Politics Without Principle: Sovereignty, Ethics, and the Narratives of the Gulf War. Vol. Critical perspectives on world politics. Boulder, Colo: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Campbell, David. 1996. ‘Political Prosaics, Transversal Politics and the Anarchical World’. in Challenging Boundaries: Global Flows, Territorial Identities. Vol. Borderlines. Minneapolis, Minn: University of Minnesota Press.
Carr, E. H. 1999. ‘The Nature of Politics’. Pp. 562–66 in International Relations Theory: Realism, Pluralism, Globalism, and Beyond. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Carr, Edward Hallett, and Michael Cox. 2001. The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 1919-1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations. 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Carver, Terrell. 2004. ‘War of the Worlds/Invasion of the Body Snatchers’. International Affairs (Royal Institute Of International Affairs 1944-) 80(1).
Carver, Terrell, Molly Cochran, and Judith Squires. 1998. ‘Gendering Jones: Feminisms, IRs, Masculinities’. Review Of International Studies 24(2).
Chase-Dunn, Christopher. 1981. ‘Interstate System and Capitalist World-Economy: One Logic or Two?’ International Studies Quarterly 25(1):19–42. doi: 10.2307/2600209.
Claude, Inis L. 2012. Power and International Relations. New York: Random House.
Cox, Robert. W. 1983. ‘Gramsci, Hegemony and International Relations : An Essay in Method’. Millennium - Journal of International Studies 12(2):162–75. doi: 10.1177/03058298830120020701.
Cox, Robert W. 1986. ‘Social Forces, States and World Order’. Pp. 204–54 in Neorealism and Its Critics. Vol. New directions in world politics. New York: Columbia University Press.
Cutler, Claire. 1999. ‘Locating “Authority” in the Global Political Economy’. International Studies Quarterly 43(1):59–81.
Darby, Phillip. 2003. ‘Reconfiguring “The International” Knowledge Machines, Boundaries, and Exclusions’. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 28(1).
Darby, Phillip. 2004. ‘Pursuing the Political: A Postcolonial Rethinking of Relations International’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 33(1).
De Goede, Marieke. 2008. ‘The Politics of Preemption and the War on Terror in Europe’. European Journal of International Relations 14(1):161–85. doi: 10.1177/1354066107087764.
der Derian, James. 1989. ‘“The Boundaries of Knowledge and Power in International Relations”  In:  International/Intertextual Relations: Postmodern Readings of World Politics’. in International/Intertextual Relations: Postmodern Readings of World Politics. Vol. Issues in world politics series. Lexington, Mass: Lexington Books.
Deudney, Daniel, and G. John Ikenberry. 1999. ‘The Nature and Sources of Liberal International Order’. Review Of International Studies 25(2):179–96.
Devetek, Richard. 2005. ‘Critical Theory’. Pp. 137–60 in Theories of International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan.
Doty, Roxanne Lynn. 1993. ‘Foreign Policy as Social Construction: A Post-Positivist Analysis of U.S. Counterinsurgency Policy in the Philippines’. International Studies Quarterly 37(3). doi: 10.2307/2600810.
Dougherty, James E., and Robert L. Pfaltzgraff. 2001. Contending Theories of International Relations: A Comprehensive Survey. 5th ed. New York: Longman.
Doyle, Michael W. 1983. ‘Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs’. Philosophy & Public Affairs 12(3):205–35.
Doyle, Michael W. 1986a. ‘Liberalism and World Politics’. American Political Science Review 80(04):1151–69. doi: 10.2307/1960861.
Doyle, Michael W. 1986b. ‘Liberalism and World Politics’. American Political Science Review 80(04):1151–69. doi: 10.2307/1960861.
Doyle, Michael W. 1990. ‘Thucydidean Realism’. Review of International Studies 16(03). doi: 10.1017/S0260210500112483.
Dunne, Tim. 1995. ‘International Society: Theoretical Promises Fulfilled?’ Cooperation and Conflict 30(2):125–54. doi: 10.1177/0010836795030002002.
Dunne, Timothy, Milja Kurki, and Steve Smith, eds. 2016. International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Edkins, Jenny. 1999. Poststructuralism & International Relations: Bringing the Political Back In. Vol. Critical perspectives on world politics. Boulder, Colo: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Edkins, Jenny, and Maja Zehfuss. 2005. ‘Generalising the International’. Review of International Studies 31(03). doi: 10.1017/S0260210505006583.
Enloe, Cynthia. 1993a. ‘Are Un Peacekeepers Real Men? And Other Post-Cold War Puzzles’. Pp. 10–37 in The Morning After: Sexual Politics at the End of the Cold War. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Enloe, Cynthia. 1993b. ‘Bananas Militarized and Demilitarized’. Pp. 102–41 in The Morning After: Sexual Politics at the End of the Cold War. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Enloe, Cynthia. 2004. ‘“Gender” Is Not Enough: The Need for a Feminist Consciousness’. International Affairs 80(1).
Enloe, Cynthia H. 2000. Bananas, Beaches and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics. Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press.
Epstein, Charlotte. 2008. The Power of Words in International Relations: Birth of an Anti-Whaling Discourse. Vol. Politics, science, and the environment. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Fanon, Frantz, Richard Philcox, Jean-Paul Sartre, Homi K. Bhabha, and Cornel West. 2021. The Wretched of the Earth. 60th anniversary edition. New York: Grove Press.
Forde, Steven. 1992. ‘Varieties of Realism: Thucydides and Machiavelli’. The Journal of Politics 54(2):372–93. doi: 10.2307/2132031.
Foucault, Michel. 1991. ‘What Is An Author?’ Pp. 101–20 in The Foucault Reader. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Fukuyama, Francis. 1989. ‘The End of History?’ The National Interest (16):3–18.
Gale, Fred. 1998. ‘Cave ’Cave! Hic Dragones’ : A Neo-Gramscian Deconstruction and Reconstruction of International Regime Theory’. Review of International Political Economy 5(2):252–83. doi: 10.1080/096922998347561.
Gamble, Andrew. 1999. ‘Marxism After Communism: Beyond Realism and Historicism’. Review Of International Studies 25(5):27–144.
Garst, Daniel. 1989. ‘Thucydides and Neorealism’. International Studies Quarterly 33(1):3–27.
Genest, Marc A. 2004. Conflict and Cooperation: Evolving Theories of International Relations. 2nd ed. Belmont, CA: Thomson/Wadsworth.
Germain, Randall D., and Michael Kenny. 1998. ‘Engaging Gramsci: International Relations Theory and the New Gramscians’. Review Of International Studies 24(1).
Gill, Stephen. 1993a. Gramsci, Historical Materialism and International Relations. Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gill, Stephen. 1993b. Gramsci, Historical Materialism and International Relations. Vol. Cambridge Studies in International Relations. Cambridge [England]: Cambridge University Press.
Gill, Stephen, and David Law. 1988. ‘Marxism and the World System’. Pp. 54–70 in The Global Political Economy: Perspectives, Problems, and Policies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Gill, Stephen R., and David Law. 1989. ‘Global Hegemony and the Structural Power of Capital’. International Studies Quarterly 33(4):475–199.
Gills, B. K. 1987. ‘Historical Materialism and International Relations Theory’. Millennium - Journal of International Studies 16(2):265–70. doi: 10.1177/03058298870160020301.
Gilpin, Robert. 2002a. ‘The Rise of American Hegemony’. in Britain 1846-1914 and the United States 1941-2001. Ashgate Pub Ltd.
Gilpin, Robert. 2002b. ‘The Rise of American Hegemony’. Pp. 165–82 in Two Hegemonies: Britain 1846-1914 and the United States 1941-2001. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.
Gilpin, Robert G. 1984. ‘The Richness of the Tradition of Political Realism’. International Organization 38(02). doi: 10.1017/S0020818300026710.
Gilpin, Robert G. 1996. ‘No One Loves a Political Realist’. Security Studies 5(3):3–26.
Gilpin, Robert, and Jean M. Gilpin. 1987. The Political Economy of International Relations. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Goldgeier, James M., and Michael McFaul. 1992. ‘A Tale of Two Worlds: Core and Periphery in the Post-Cold War Era’. International Organization 46(02). doi: 10.1017/S0020818300027788.
Grieco, Joseph M. 1993. ‘Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism’. Pp. 116–42 in Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate. Vol. New Directions in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.
Grotius, Hugo, and A. C. Campbell. 1814. On the Laws of War and Peace. London.
Grotius, Hugo, and Stephen C. Neff. 2012. Hugo Grotius on the Law of War and Peace. Student ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Grovogui, Siba N. 2002. ‘Regimes of Sovereignty: International Morality and the African Condition’. European Journal of International Relations 8(3):315–38.
Grunberg, Isabelle. 1990. ‘Exploring the "Myth” of Hegemonic Stability’. International Organization 44(04). doi: 10.1017/S0020818300035372.
Gusterson, Hugh. 2005. ‘Nuclear Weapons and the Other in the Western Imagination’. Pp. 21–47 in People of the Bomb: Portraits of America’s Nuclear Complex. Minneapolis, Minn: University of Minnesota Press.
H. Herz, John. 1957. ‘Rise and Demise of The Territorial State’. World Politics 9(4):473–93.
Halliday, Fred. 1994. ‘A Necessary Encounter: Historical Materialism and International Relations’. in Rethinking International Relations. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Haslam, Jonathan. 2002. No Virtue Like Necessity: Realist Thought in International Relations Since Machiavelli. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Herz, John H. 1942. ‘Power Politics and World Organization’. The American Political Science Review 36(6). doi: 10.2307/1949064.
Hobbes, Thomas. 1999. ‘The Natural Conditions of Mankind’. Pp. 94–98 in International Relations Theory: Realism, Pluralism, Globalism, and Beyond. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Hobson, J. M. 2005. ‘The Enduring Place of Hierarchy in World Politics: Tracing the Social Logics        of Hierarchy and Political Change’. European Journal of International Relations 11(1):63–98. doi: 10.1177/1354066105050137.
Hoffmann, Stanley. 1977. ‘An American Social Science: International Relations’. Daedalus 106(3):41–60.
Hoffmann, Stanley. 1987a. ‘An American Social Science: International Relations’. Pp. 219–21 in Janus and Minerva: Essays in the Theory and Practice of International Politics. Boulder: Westview.
Hoffmann, Stanley. 1987b. ‘Liberalism and International Affairs’. Pp. 394–417 in Janus and Minerva: Essays in the Theory and Practice of International Politics. Boulder.
Hopf, Ted. 1998. ‘The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory’. International Security 23(1):171–200. doi: 10.2307/2539267.
Howe, Paul. 1994. ‘The Utopian Realism of E. H. Carr’. Review of International Studies 20(3):277–97. doi: 10.1017/S0260210500118078.
Hurrell, Andrew. 2003. ‘Order and Justice in International Relations: What Is at Stake?’ in Order and Justice in International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ikenberry, G. John. 2009a. ‘Liberal Internationalism 3.0: America and the Dilemmas of Liberal World Order’. Perspectives on Politics 7(1):71–87. doi: 10.1017/S1537592709090112.
Ikenberry, G. John. 2009b. ‘Liberal Internationalism 3.0: America and the Dilemmas of Liberal World Order’. Perspectives on Politics 7(01):71–87. doi: 10.1017/S1537592709090112.
Jackson, Robert, and Georg Sorensen. 2003. Introduction to International Relations: Theories and Approaches. Rev. and expanded 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
James, Alan. 1989. ‘The Realism of Realism: The State and the Study of International Relations’. Review of International Studies 15(03). doi: 10.1017/S0260210500112847.
Jervis, Robert. 1999. ‘Realism, Neoliberalism, and Cooperation: Understanding the Debate’. International Security 24(1):42–63. doi: 10.1162/016228899560040.
Jones, Adam. 1996. ‘Does “Gender” Make the World Go Round? Feminist Critiques of International Relations’. Review of International Studies 22(04). doi: 10.1017/S0260210500118649.
Kant, Immanuel. 1970a. ‘An Answer to the Question: ‘What Is Enlightenment?’’. in Kant’s Political Writings. Vol. Cambridge studies in the history and theory of politics. London: Cambridge University Press.
Kant, Immanuel. 1970b. ‘Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch’. in Kant’s Political Writings. Vol. Cambridge studies in the history and theory of politics. London: Cambridge University Press.
Katzenstein, Peter J. 1996. The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics. Vol. New directions in world politics. New York: Columbia University Press.
Kegley, Charles W., and Shannon Lindsey Blanton. 2011. World Politics: Trend and Transformation. Boston, Mass: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Keohane, Robert O. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Keohane, Robert O. 1986. Neorealism and Its Critics. Vol. New directions in world politics. New York: Columbia University Press.
Keohane, Robert O. 2005. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Keohane, Robert O., and Joseph S. Nye. 1987. ‘Power and Interdependence Revisited’. International Organization 41(04). doi: 10.1017/S0020818300027661.
Keohane, Robert O., and Joseph S. Nye. 1989. Power and Interdependence. 2nd ed. [S.l.]: HarperCollins.
Kindleberger, Charles P. 1981. ‘Dominance and Leadership in the International Economy: Exploitation, Public Goods, and Free Rides’. International Studies Quarterly 25(2). doi: 10.2307/2600355.
Krauthammer, Charles. 1992. ‘The Unipolar Moment’. Pp. 313–44 in Rethinking America’s Security: Beyond Cold War to New World Order. New York: Norton.
Krebs, R. R., and P. T. Jackson. 2007. ‘Twisting Tongues and Twisting Arms: The Power of Political Rhetoric’. European Journal of International Relations 13(1):35–66. doi: 10.1177/1354066107074284.
Krishna, Sankaran. 2001. ‘Race, Amnesia, and the Education of International Relations’. Alternatives 26(4).
Lake, David A. 1993. ‘Leadership, Hegemony, and the International Economy: Naked Emperor or Tattered Monarch With Potential?’ International Studies Quarterly 37(4).
Legro, Jeffrey W., and Andrew Moravcsik. 1999. ‘Is Anybody Still a Realist?’ International Security 24(2):5–55.
Lenin, V. I. 1963. ‘Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism: A Popular Outline’. Retrieved (https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1916/imp-hsc/).
Lenin, V. I. 1973a. Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism : A Popular Outline. Peking: Foreign Languages Press.
Lenin, V. I. 1973b. Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism : A Popular Outline. Peking: Foreign Languages Press.
Ling, Lily H. M. 1996. ‘Hegemony and the Internationalizing State: A Post‐colonial Analysis of China’s Integration Into Asian Corporatism’. Review of International Political Economy 3(1):1–26. doi: 10.1080/09692299608434343.
Linklater, Andrew. 1986a. ‘Realism, Marxism and Critical International Theory’. Review of International Studies 12(04). doi: 10.1017/S0260210500113865.
Linklater, Andrew. 1986b. ‘Realism, Marxism and Critical International Theory’. Review of International Studies 12(4):301–12. doi: 10.1017/S0260210500113865.
Linklater, Andrew. 1997. ‘The Transformation of Political Community: E. H. Carr, Critical Theory and International Relations’. Review Of International Studies 23(3).
Linklater, Andrew. 2004. ‘Dominant and Destructive Masculinities’. International Affairs 80(1).
Linklater, Andrew. 2005. ‘Marxism’. Pp. 110–36 in Theories of International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan.
Lynch, Cecelia. 1994. ‘E.H. Carr, International Relations Theory, and the Societal Origins of International Legal Norms’. Millennium - Journal of International Studies 23(3):589–619. doi: 10.1177/03058298940230030801.
Macchiavell, Niccolo. 1996. ‘Excerpts from “The Prince” in Classics of International Relations’. Pp. 15–20 in Classics of International Relations. Upper Saddle River, N.J: Prentice Hall.
Machiavelli, Nicolo, and W. K. Marriott. 1505. ‘The Prince’. Retrieved (https://web.archive.org/web/20060101054818/http://www.ilt.columbia.edu/publications/machiavelli.html).
MacLean, John. 1981. ‘Marxist Epistemology, Explanations of “Change” and the Study of International Relations’. Pp. 46–67 in Change and the Study of International Relations: The Evaded Dimension. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Maclean, John. 1988. ‘Marxism and International Relations: A Strange Case of Mutual Neglect’. Millennium - Journal of International Studies 17(2):295–319. doi: 10.1177/03058298880170021201.
Marx, Karl, Friedrich Engels, and Robert C. Tucker. 1978a. ‘Economic and Philosophic Manuscript of 1844’. Pp. 66–125 in The Marx-Engels Reader. New York: Norton.
Marx, Karl, Friedrich Engels, and Robert C. Tucker. 1978b. ‘Wage, Labour and Capital’. Pp. 203–17 in The Marx-Engels Reader. New York: Norton.
Marx, Karl, Friedrich Engels, and Robert C. Tucker. 1978c. ‘Wage, Labour and Capital’. Pp. 203–17 in The Marx-Engels Reader. New York: Norton.
Marx, Karl, and Robert C. Tucker. 1978a. ‘Economic and Philosophic Manuscript of 1844’. Pp. 66–125 in The Marx-Engels Reader. New York: Norton.
Marx, Karl, and Robert C. Tucker. 1978b. ‘Theories of Surplus Value’. Pp. 443–68 in The Marx-Engels Reader. New York: Norton.
Mastanduno, Michael. 1997. ‘Preserving the Unipolar Moment: Realist Theories and U.S. Grand Strategy After the Cold War’. International Security 21(4). doi: 10.2307/2539283.
McClintock, Anne. 1992. ‘The Angel of Progress: Pitfalls of the Term “Post-Colonialism”’. Social Text (31/32). doi: 10.2307/466219.
McKeown, Timothy J. 1983. ‘Hegemonic Stability Theory and 19th Century Tariff Levels in Europe’. International Organization 37(01). doi: 10.1017/S0020818300004203.
Mearsheimer, J. J. 2005. ‘E.H. Carr vs. Idealism: The Battle Rages On’. International Relations 19(2):139–52. doi: 10.1177/0047117805052810.
Mearsheimer, John J. 1994. ‘The False Promise of International Institutions’. International Security 19(3). doi: 10.2307/2539078.
Merrington, John. 1978. ‘Theory and Practice in Gramsci’s Marxism’. Pp. 140–75 in Western Marxism: A Critical Reader. London: Verso.
Milliken, Jennifer. 1999. ‘The Study of Discourse in International Relations: A Critique of Research and Methods’. European Journal of International Relations 5(2).
Milner, Helen. 1992. ‘International Theories of Cooperation Among Nations: Strengths and Weaknesses’. World Politics 44(03):466–96. doi: 10.2307/2010546.
Modelski, George. 1978. ‘The Long Cycle of Global Politics and the Nation-State’. Comparative Studies in Society and History 20(02). doi: 10.1017/S0010417500008914.
Moravcsik, Andrew. 1997. ‘Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics’. International Organization 52(1).
Morgenthau, Hans. 1948. ‘The Political Science of E. H. Carr’. World Politics 1(1):127–34. doi: 10.2307/2009162.
Morgenthau, Hans J. 2006a. ‘A Realist Theory of International Politics’. in Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. Boston: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
Morgenthau, Hans J. 2006b. ‘Different Methods of the Balance of Power’. in Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. Boston: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
Morgenthau, Hans J. 2006c. ‘The Balance of Power’. in Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. Boston: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
Morgenthau, Hans Joachim. 1974. Scientific Man vs. Power Politics. Vol. Midway reprint. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Morton, Adam David, Bieler, Andreas ;, Andreas Bieler, and Adam David Morton. 2001. ‘The Gordian Knot of Agency-Structure in International Relations: A Neo-Gramscian Perspective’. European Journal of International Relations 7(1).
Murphy, Craig N. 1998. ‘Understanding IR: Understanding Gramsci’. Review Of International Studies 24(3).
Neumann, I. B. 2008. ‘The Body of the Diplomat’. European Journal of International Relations 14(4):671–95. doi: 10.1177/1354066108097557.
Niebuhr, Reinhold. 2005. Moral Man and Immoral Society: A Study in Ethics and Politics. Vol. Continuum impacts. London: Continuum.
ÓTuathail, Gearóid. 2002. ‘Theorizing Practical Geopolitical Reasoning: The Case of the United States’ Response to the War in Bosnia’. Political Geography 21(5):601–28. doi: 10.1016/S0962-6298(02)00009-4.
Palan, Ronen P., and Brook M. Blair. 1993. ‘On the Idealist Origins of the Realist Theory of International Relations’. Review of International Studies 19(04). doi: 10.1017/S0260210500118273.
Paul, T. V. 2016. ‘Recasting Statecraft - International Relations and Strategies of Peaceful Change’. Presidential Address International Studies Association (ISA), 57th Annual Convention.
Powell, Robert. 1994. ‘Anarchy in International Relations Theory: The Neorealist-Neoliberal Debate’. International Organization 48(02). doi: 10.1017/S0020818300028204.
Price, Richard, and Christian Reus-Smit. 1998. ‘Dangerous Liaisons? Critical International Theory and Constructivism’. European Journal of International Relations 4(3).
Reus-Smit, Christian. 2005. ‘Constructivism’. Pp. 188–212 in Theories of International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan.
Rosecrance, Richard. 1987. ‘Long Cycle Theory and International Relations’. International Organization 41(2):283–301. doi: 10.1017/S0020818300027478.
Rosenberg, Justin. 1996. ‘Isaac Deutscher and the Lost History of International Relations’. New Left Review (215).
Ruggie, John Gerard. 1982. ‘International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order’. International Organization 36(02). doi: 10.1017/S0020818300018993.
Ruggie, John Gerard. 1998. ‘What Makes the World Hang Together? Neo-Utilitarianism and the Social Constructivist Challenge’. International Organization 52(4).
Rupert, Mark. 1995. Producing Hegemony: The Politics of Mass Production and American Global Power. Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Said, Edward. 1991. ‘The Scope of Orientalism’. in Orientalism. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Santos, Theotonio Dos. 1970. ‘The Structure of Dependence’. American Economic Review 60(2):231–36.
Shaw, Martin. 2002. ‘Post-Imperial and Quasi-Imperial: State and Empire in the Global Era’. Millennium - Journal of International Studies 31(2):327–36. doi: 10.1177/03058298020310020701.
Simmons, Beth A., and Daniel J. Hopkins. 2005. ‘The Constraining Power of International Treaties: Theory and Methods’. American Political Science Review 99(04). doi: 10.1017/S0003055405051920.
Skjelsbæk, Inger. n.d. ‘Sexual Violence and War: Mapping Out a Complex Relationship’. European Journal of International Relations 7(2).
Slater, David. 1998. ‘Post-Colonial Questions for Global Times’. Review of International Political Economy 5(4):647–78. doi: 10.1080/096922998347417.
Slaughter, Anne-Marie. 2004. A New World Order. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Smith, Michael Joseph. 1986. Realist Thought From Weber to Kissinger. London.
Snidal, Duncan. 1985. ‘The Limits of Hegemonic Stability Theory’. International Organization 39(04). doi: 10.1017/S002081830002703X.
Sterling-Folker, Jennifer. 2000. ‘Competing Paradigms or Birds of a Feather? Constructivism and Neoliberal Institutionalism Compared’. International Studies Quarterly 44(1):97–119. doi: 10.1111/0020-8833.00150.
Stern, Maria, and Marysia Zalewski. 2009. ‘Feminist Fatigue(s): Reflections on Feminism and Familiar Fables of Militarisation’. Review of International Studies 35(03). doi: 10.1017/S0260210509008675.
Thucydides. 1954. ‘The Melian Dialogue’. Pp. 400–408 in History of the Peloponnesian war. Vol. Penguin classics. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Thucydides. 1996. ‘The Melian Dialogue’. Pp. 84–90 in Classics of International Relations. Upper Saddle River, N.J: Prentice Hall.
Thucydides, and Richard Crawley. n.d. ‘History of the Peloponnesian War’. Retrieved (http://people.ucalgary.ca/~vandersp/Courses/texts/thucydi1.html).
Tickner, J. Ann. 1988. ‘Hans Morgenthau’s Principles of Political Realism: A Feminist Reformulation’. Millennium - Journal of International Studies 17(3):429–40. doi: 10.1177/03058298880170030801.
Tickner, J. Ann. 1997. ‘You Just Don’t Understand: Troubled Engagements Between Feminists and IR Theorists’. International Studies Quarterly 41(4):611–32.
True, Jacqui. 2005. ‘Feminism’. Pp. 213–34 in Theories of International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan.
Vasquez, John A. 1998. The Power of Power Politics: From Classical Realism to Neotraditionalism. Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vincent, R. J. 1988. ‘Hedley Bull and Order in International Politics’. Millennium - Journal of International Studies 17(2):195–213. doi: 10.1177/03058298880170020701.
Viotti, Paul R., and Mark V. Kauppi. 1999. ‘Realism: The State, Power and the Balance of Power’. Pp. 35–67 in International Relations Theory: Realism, Pluralism, Globalism, and Beyond. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1974a. The Modern World-System Vol. 1: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century. Vol. Studies in Social Discontinuity. New York: Academic.
Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1974b. ‘The Rise and Future Demise of the World Capitalist System: Concepts for Comparative Analysis’. Comparative Studies in Society and History 16(4):387–415. doi: 10.1017/S0010417500007520.
Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1983. ‘The Three Instances of Hegemony in the History of the Capitalist World-Economy’. Comparative Sociology 24(1):100–108. doi: 10.1163/156854283X00071.
Waltz, Kenneth N. 1979. Theory of International Politics. London: McGraw-Hill.
Waltz, Kenneth N. 2001. Man, the State, and War: A Theoretical Analysis. New ed. New York: Columbia University Press.
Wendt, Alexander. 1992. ‘Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics’. International Organization 46(2):391–425. doi: 10.1017/S0020818300027764.
Wilson, Peter. 1998. ‘The Myth of the “First Great Debate”’. Review of International Studies 24(4):1–15.
Wilson, Woodrow. 2014. ‘The World Must Be Made Safe for Democracy: The Fourteen Points’. Pp. 4–6 in Essential Readings in World Politics. Vol. The Norton series in world politics, edited by K. A. Mingst and J. L. Snyder (eds.). New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
Wolfers, Arnold. 1962. Discord and Collaboration: Essays on International Politics. London: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Youngs, Gillian. 2004. ‘Feminist International Relations: A Contradiction in Terms? Or: Why Women and Gender Are Essential to Understanding the World “We” Live In*’. International Affairs 80(1):75–87. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2346.2004.00367.x.
Zacher, Mark W., and Richard A. Matthew. 1995. ‘Liberal International Theory: Common Threads, Divergent Strands’. Pp. 107–50 in Controversies in International Relations Theory: Realism and the Neo-Liberal Challenge. Basingstoke: Macmillan.