[1]
Adler, E. 2008. The Spread of Security Communities: Communities of Practice, Self-Restraint, and NATO’s Post--Cold War Transformation. European Journal of International Relations. 14, 2 (2008), 195–230. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066108089241.
[2]
Aron, R. 1966. Peace and War: A Theory of International Relations. Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
[3]
Ashley, R.K. 1984. The Poverty of Neorealism. International Organization. 38, 02 (1984). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300026709.
[4]
Autesserre, S. 2009. Hobbes and the Congo: Frames, Local Violence, and International Intervention. International Organization. 63, 02 (2009). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818309090080.
[5]
Aydinli, E. and Mathews, J. 2008. Periphery Theorising for a Truly Internationalised Discipline: Spinning IR Theory Out of Anatolia. Review of International Studies. 34, 04 (2008). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210508008231.
[6]
Bagby, L.M.J. 1994. The Use and Abuse of Thucydides in International Relations. International Organization. 48, 01 (1994). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300000849.
[7]
Baldwin, D.A. 1993. Neoliberalism, Neorealism, and World Politics. Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate. Columbia University Press. 3–28.
[8]
Barkawi, T. and Laffey, M. 2002. Retrieving the Imperial: Empire and International Relations. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 31, 1 (2002), 109–127. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298020310010601.
[9]
Bellamy, A.J. 2005. International Society and Its Critics. Oxford University Press.
[10]
Bellamy, A.J. 2004. International Society and Its Critics. Oxford University Press.
[11]
Bellamy, A.J. 2005. International Society and Its Critics. Oxford University Press.
[12]
Bellamy, A.J. 2004. International Society and Its Critics. Oxford University Press.
[13]
Berki, R.N. 1971. On Marxian Thought and the Problem of International Relations. World Politics. 24, 01 (1971), 80–105. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/2009707.
[14]
Brown, C. 1995. International Theory and International Society: The Viability of the Middle Way? Review of International Studies. 21, 02 (1995). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500117619.
[15]
Brown, C. 1995. International Theory and International Society: The Viability of the Middle Way? Review of International Studies. 21, 02 (1995). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500117619.
[16]
Brown, W. 1992. Finding the Man in the State. Feminist Studies. 18, 1 (1992).
[17]
Bull, H. 1971. Order vs. Justice in International Society. Political Studies. 19, 3 (1971), 269–283. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1971.tb00674.x.
[18]
Bull, H. 2012. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. Palgrave Macmillan.
[19]
Bull, H. 1990. The Importance of Grotius in the Study of International Relations. Hugo Grotius and International Relations. Clarendon. 65–94.
[20]
Burnham, P. 1994. Open Marxism and Vulgar International Political Economy. Review of International Political Economy. 1, 2 (1994), 221–231. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09692299408434277.
[21]
Burnham, P. 1998. The Communist Manifesto as International Relations Theory. The Communist Manifesto: New Interpretations. Edinburgh University Press.
[22]
Buzan, B. 2004. From International to World Society?: English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation. Cambridge University Press.
[23]
Buzan, B. 2004. From International to World Society?: English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation. Cambridge University Press.
[24]
Callinicos, A. 2002. The Actuality of Imperialism. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 31, 2 (2002), 319–326. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298020310020601.
[25]
Campbell, D. 1996. Political Prosaics, Transversal Politics and the Anarchical World. Challenging Boundaries: Global Flows, Territorial Identities. University of Minnesota Press.
[26]
Campbell, D. 1993. Politics Without Principle: Sovereignty, Ethics, and the Narratives of the Gulf War. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
[27]
Carr, E.H. 1999. The Nature of Politics. International Relations Theory: Realism, Pluralism, Globalism, and Beyond. Allyn and Bacon. 562–566.
[28]
Carr, E.H. and Cox, M. 2001. The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 1919-1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations. Palgrave.
[29]
Carver, T. et al. 1998. Gendering Jones: Feminisms, IRs, Masculinities. Review Of International Studies. 24, 2 (1998).
[30]
Carver, T. 2004. War of the Worlds/Invasion of the Body Snatchers. International Affairs (Royal Institute Of International Affairs 1944-). 80, 1 (2004).
[31]
Chase-Dunn, C. 1981. Interstate System and Capitalist World-Economy: One Logic or Two? International Studies Quarterly. 25, 1 (1981), 19–42. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/2600209.
[32]
Claude, I.L. 2012. Power and International Relations. Random House.
[33]
Cox, Robert.W. 1983. Gramsci, Hegemony and International Relations : An Essay in Method. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 12, 2 (1983), 162–175. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298830120020701.
[34]
Cox, R.W. 1986. Social Forces, States and World Order. Neorealism and Its Critics. Columbia University Press. 204–254.
[35]
Cutler, C. 1999. Locating ‘Authority’ in the Global Political Economy. International Studies Quarterly. 43, 1 (1999), 59–81.
[36]
Darby, P. 2004. Pursuing the Political: A Postcolonial Rethinking of Relations International. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 33, 1 (2004).
[37]
Darby, P. 2003. Reconfiguring ‘The International’ Knowledge Machines, Boundaries, and Exclusions. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political. 28, 1 (2003).
[38]
De Goede, M. 2008. The Politics of Preemption and the War on Terror in Europe. European Journal of International Relations. 14, 1 (2008), 161–185. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066107087764.
[39]
der Derian, J. 1989. ‘The Boundaries of Knowledge and Power in International Relations’  In:  International/Intertextual Relations: Postmodern Readings of World Politics. International/Intertextual Relations: Postmodern Readings of World Politics. Lexington Books.
[40]
Deudney, D. and Ikenberry, G.J. 1999. The Nature and Sources of Liberal International Order. Review Of International Studies. 25, 2 (1999), 179–196.
[41]
Devetek, R. 2005. Critical Theory. Theories of International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan. 137–160.
[42]
Doty, R.L. 1993. Foreign Policy as Social Construction: A Post-Positivist Analysis of U.S. Counterinsurgency Policy in the Philippines. International Studies Quarterly. 37, 3 (1993). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/2600810.
[43]
Dougherty, J.E. and Pfaltzgraff, R.L. 2001. Contending Theories of International Relations: A Comprehensive Survey. Longman.
[44]
Doyle, M.W. 1983. Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 12, 3 (1983), 205–235.
[45]
Doyle, M.W. 1986. Liberalism and World Politics. American Political Science Review. 80, 04 (1986), 1151–1169. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/1960861.
[46]
Doyle, M.W. 1986. Liberalism and World Politics. American Political Science Review. 80, 04 (1986), 1151–1169. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/1960861.
[47]
Doyle, M.W. 1990. Thucydidean Realism. Review of International Studies. 16, 03 (1990). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500112483.
[48]
Dunne, T. et al. eds. 2016. International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Oxford University Press.
[49]
Dunne, T. 1995. International Society: Theoretical Promises Fulfilled? Cooperation and Conflict. 30, 2 (1995), 125–154. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836795030002002.
[50]
Edkins, J. 1999. Poststructuralism & International Relations: Bringing the Political Back In. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
[51]
Edkins, J. and Zehfuss, M. 2005. Generalising the International. Review of International Studies. 31, 03 (2005). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210505006583.
[52]
Enloe, C. 1993. Are Un Peacekeepers Real Men? and Other Post-Cold War Puzzles. The Morning After: Sexual Politics at the End of the Cold War. University of California Press. 10–37.
[53]
Enloe, C. 1993. Bananas Militarized and Demilitarized. The Morning After: Sexual Politics at the End of the Cold War. University of California Press. 102–141.
[54]
Enloe, C. 2004. ‘Gender’ Is Not Enough: The Need for a Feminist Consciousness. International Affairs. 80, 1 (2004).
[55]
Enloe, C.H. 2000. Bananas, Beaches and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics. University of California Press.
[56]
Epstein, C. 2008. The Power of Words in International Relations: Birth of an Anti-Whaling Discourse. MIT Press.
[57]
Fanon, F. et al. 2021. The Wretched of the Earth. Grove Press.
[58]
Forde, S. 1992. Varieties of Realism: Thucydides and Machiavelli. The Journal of Politics. 54, 2 (1992), 372–393. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/2132031.
[59]
Foucault, M. 1991. What Is An Author? The Foucault Reader. Penguin. 101–120.
[60]
Fukuyama, F. 1989. The End of History? The National Interest. 16 (1989), 3–18.
[61]
Gale, F. 1998. Cave ’Cave! Hic Dragones’ : A Neo-Gramscian Deconstruction and Reconstruction of International Regime Theory. Review of International Political Economy. 5, 2 (1998), 252–283. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/096922998347561.
[62]
Gamble, A. 1999. Marxism After Communism: Beyond Realism and Historicism. Review Of International Studies. 25, 5 (1999), 27–144.
[63]
Garst, D. 1989. Thucydides and Neorealism. International Studies Quarterly. 33, 1 (1989), 3–27.
[64]
Genest, M.A. 2004. Conflict and Cooperation: Evolving Theories of International Relations. Thomson/Wadsworth.
[65]
Germain, R.D. and Kenny, M. 1998. Engaging Gramsci: International Relations Theory and the New Gramscians. Review Of International Studies. 24, 1 (1998).
[66]
Gill, S. 1993. Gramsci, Historical Materialism and International Relations. Cambridge University Press.
[67]
Gill, S. 1993. Gramsci, Historical Materialism and International Relations. Cambridge University Press.
[68]
Gill, S. and Law, D. 1988. Marxism and the World System. The Global Political Economy: Perspectives, Problems, and Policies. Johns Hopkins University Press. 54–70.
[69]
Gill, S.R. and Law, D. 1989. Global Hegemony and the Structural Power of Capital. International Studies Quarterly. 33, 4 (1989), 475–199.
[70]
Gills, B.K. 1987. Historical Materialism and International Relations Theory. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 16, 2 (1987), 265–270. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298870160020301.
[71]
Gilpin, R. 2002. The Rise of American Hegemony. Britain 1846-1914 and the United States 1941-2001. Ashgate Pub Ltd.
[72]
Gilpin, R. 2002. The Rise of American Hegemony. Two Hegemonies: Britain 1846-1914 and the United States 1941-2001. Ashgate Publishing Ltd. 165–182.
[73]
Gilpin, R. and Gilpin, J.M. 1987. The Political Economy of International Relations. Princeton University Press.
[74]
Gilpin, R.G. 1996. No One Loves a Political Realist. Security Studies. 5, 3 (1996), 3–26.
[75]
Gilpin, R.G. 1984. The Richness of the Tradition of Political Realism. International Organization. 38, 02 (1984). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300026710.
[76]
Goldgeier, J.M. and McFaul, M. 1992. A Tale of Two Worlds: Core and Periphery in the Post-Cold War Era. International Organization. 46, 02 (1992). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027788.
[77]
Grieco, J.M. 1993. Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism. Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate. Columbia University Press. 116–142.
[78]
Grotius, H. and Campbell, A.C. 1814. On the Laws of War and Peace.
[79]
Grotius, H. and Neff, S.C. 2012. Hugo Grotius on the Law of War and Peace. Cambridge University Press.
[80]
Grovogui, S.N. 2002. Regimes of Sovereignty: International Morality and the African Condition. European Journal of International Relations. 8, 3 (2002), 315–338.
[81]
Grunberg, I. 1990. Exploring the "Myth” of Hegemonic Stability. International Organization. 44, 04 (1990). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300035372.
[82]
Gusterson, H. 2005. Nuclear Weapons and the Other in the Western Imagination. People of the Bomb: Portraits of America’s Nuclear Complex. University of Minnesota Press. 21–47.
[83]
H. Herz, J. 1957. Rise and Demise of The Territorial State. World Politics. 9, 4 (1957), 473–493.
[84]
Halliday, F. 1994. A Necessary Encounter: Historical Materialism and International Relations. Rethinking International Relations. Macmillan.
[85]
Haslam, J. 2002. No Virtue Like Necessity: Realist Thought in International Relations Since Machiavelli. Yale University Press.
[86]
Herz, J.H. 1942. Power Politics and World Organization. The American Political Science Review. 36, 6 (1942). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/1949064.
[87]
History of the Peloponnesian War: http://people.ucalgary.ca/~vandersp/Courses/texts/thucydi1.html.
[88]
Hobbes, T. 1999. The Natural Conditions of Mankind. International Relations Theory: Realism, Pluralism, Globalism, and Beyond. Allyn and Bacon. 94–98.
[89]
Hobson, J.M. 2005. The Enduring Place of Hierarchy in World Politics: Tracing the Social Logics        of Hierarchy and Political Change. European Journal of International Relations. 11, 1 (2005), 63–98. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066105050137.
[90]
Hoffmann, S. 1977. An American Social Science: International Relations. Daedalus. 106, 3 (1977), 41–60.
[91]
Hoffmann, S. 1987. An American Social Science: International Relations. Janus and Minerva: Essays in the Theory and Practice of International Politics. Westview. 219–221.
[92]
Hoffmann, S. 1987. Liberalism and International Affairs. Janus and Minerva: Essays in the Theory and Practice of International Politics. 394–417.
[93]
Hopf, T. 1998. The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory. International Security. 23, 1 (1998), 171–200. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/2539267.
[94]
Howe, P. 1994. The Utopian Realism of E. H. Carr. Review of International Studies. 20, 3 (1994), 277–297. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500118078.
[95]
Hurrell, A. 2003. Order and Justice in International Relations: What is at Stake? Order and Justice in International Relations. Oxford University Press.
[96]
Ikenberry, G.J. 2009. Liberal Internationalism 3.0: America and the Dilemmas of Liberal World Order. Perspectives on Politics. 7, 1 (2009), 71–87. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592709090112.
[97]
Ikenberry, G.J. 2009. Liberal Internationalism 3.0: America and the Dilemmas of Liberal World Order. Perspectives on Politics. 7, 01 (2009), 71–87. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592709090112.
[98]
Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism: A Popular Outline: 1963. https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1916/imp-hsc/.
[99]
Jackson, R. and Sorensen, G. 2003. Introduction to International Relations: Theories and Approaches. Oxford University Press.
[100]
James, A. 1989. The Realism of Realism: The State and the Study of International Relations. Review of International Studies. 15, 03 (1989). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500112847.
[101]
Jervis, R. 1999. Realism, Neoliberalism, and Cooperation: Understanding the Debate. International Security. 24, 1 (1999), 42–63. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1162/016228899560040.
[102]
Jones, A. 1996. Does ‘Gender’ Make the World Go Round? Feminist Critiques of International Relations. Review of International Studies. 22, 04 (1996). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500118649.
[103]
Kant, I. 1970. An Answer to the Question: ‘What is Enlightenment?’. Kant’s Political Writings. Cambridge University Press.
[104]
Kant, I. 1970. Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch. Kant’s Political Writings. Cambridge University Press.
[105]
Katzenstein, P.J. 1996. The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics. Columbia University Press.
[106]
Kegley, C.W. and Blanton, S.L. 2011. World Politics: Trend and Transformation. Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
[107]
Keohane, R.O. 2005. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton University Press.
[108]
Keohane, R.O. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton University Press.
[109]
Keohane, R.O. 1986. Neorealism and Its Critics. Columbia University Press.
[110]
Keohane, R.O. and Nye, J.S. 1989. Power and Interdependence. HarperCollins.
[111]
Keohane, R.O. and Nye, J.S. 1987. Power and Interdependence Revisited. International Organization. 41, 04 (1987). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027661.
[112]
Kindleberger, C.P. 1981. Dominance and Leadership in the International Economy: Exploitation, Public Goods, and Free Rides. International Studies Quarterly. 25, 2 (1981). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/2600355.
[113]
Krauthammer, C. 1992. The Unipolar Moment. Rethinking America’s Security: Beyond Cold War to New World Order. Norton. 313–344.
[114]
Krebs, R.R. and Jackson, P.T. 2007. Twisting Tongues and Twisting Arms: The Power of Political Rhetoric. European Journal of International Relations. 13, 1 (2007), 35–66. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066107074284.
[115]
Krishna, S. 2001. Race, Amnesia, and the Education of International Relations. Alternatives. 26, 4 (2001).
[116]
Lake, D.A. 1993. Leadership, Hegemony, and the International Economy: Naked Emperor or Tattered Monarch With Potential? International Studies Quarterly. 37, 4 (1993).
[117]
Legro, J.W. and Moravcsik, A. 1999. Is Anybody Still a Realist? International Security. 24, 2 (1999), 5–55.
[118]
Lenin, V.I. 1973. Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism : A Popular Outline. Foreign Languages Press.
[119]
Lenin, V.I. 1973. Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism : A Popular Outline. Foreign Languages Press.
[120]
Ling, L.H.M. 1996. Hegemony and the Internationalizing State: A Post‐colonial Analysis of China’s Integration Into Asian Corporatism. Review of International Political Economy. 3, 1 (1996), 1–26. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09692299608434343.
[121]
Linklater, A. 2004. Dominant and Destructive Masculinities. International Affairs. 80, 1 (2004).
[122]
Linklater, A. 2005. Marxism. Theories of International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan. 110–136.
[123]
Linklater, A. 1986. Realism, Marxism and Critical International Theory. Review of International Studies. 12, 04 (1986). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500113865.
[124]
Linklater, A. 1986. Realism, Marxism and Critical International Theory. Review of International Studies. 12, 4 (1986), 301–312. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500113865.
[125]
Linklater, A. 1997. The Transformation of Political Community: E. H. Carr, Critical Theory and International Relations. Review Of International Studies. 23, 3 (1997).
[126]
Lynch, C. 1994. E.H. Carr, International Relations Theory, and the Societal Origins of International Legal Norms. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 23, 3 (1994), 589–619. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298940230030801.
[127]
Macchiavell, N. 1996. Excerpts from ‘The Prince’ in Classics of International Relations. Classics of International Relations. Prentice Hall. 15–20.
[128]
Maclean, J. 1988. Marxism and International Relations: A Strange Case of Mutual Neglect. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 17, 2 (1988), 295–319. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298880170021201.
[129]
MacLean, J. 1981. Marxist Epistemology, Explanations of ‘Change’ and the Study of International Relations. Change and the Study of International Relations: The Evaded Dimension. St. Martin’s Press. 46–67.
[130]
Marx, K. et al. 1978. Economic and Philosophic Manuscript of 1844. The Marx-Engels Reader. Norton. 66–125.
[131]
Marx, K. et al. 1978. Wage, Labour and Capital. The Marx-Engels Reader. Norton. 203–217.
[132]
Marx, K. et al. 1978. Wage, Labour and Capital. The Marx-Engels Reader. Norton. 203–217.
[133]
Marx, K. and Tucker, R.C. 1978. Economic and Philosophic Manuscript of 1844. The Marx-Engels Reader. Norton. 66–125.
[134]
Marx, K. and Tucker, R.C. 1978. Theories of Surplus Value. The Marx-Engels Reader. Norton. 443–468.
[135]
Mastanduno, M. 1997. Preserving the Unipolar Moment: Realist Theories and U.S. Grand Strategy After the Cold War. International Security. 21, 4 (1997). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/2539283.
[136]
McClintock, A. 1992. The Angel of Progress: Pitfalls of the Term ‘Post-Colonialism’. Social Text. 31/32 (1992). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/466219.
[137]
McKeown, T.J. 1983. Hegemonic Stability Theory and 19th Century Tariff Levels in Europe. International Organization. 37, 01 (1983). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300004203.
[138]
Mearsheimer, J.J. 2005. E.H. Carr vs. Idealism: The Battle Rages On. International Relations. 19, 2 (2005), 139–152. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117805052810.
[139]
Mearsheimer, J.J. 1994. The False Promise of International Institutions. International Security. 19, 3 (1994). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/2539078.
[140]
Merrington, J. 1978. Theory and Practice in Gramsci’s Marxism. Western Marxism: A Critical Reader. Verso. 140–175.
[141]
Milliken, Jennifer 1999. The Study of Discourse in International Relations: A Critique of Research and Methods. European Journal of International Relations. 5, 2 (1999).
[142]
Milner, H. 1992. International Theories of Cooperation Among Nations: Strengths and Weaknesses. World Politics. 44, 03 (1992), 466–496. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/2010546.
[143]
Modelski, G. 1978. The Long Cycle of Global Politics and the Nation-State. Comparative Studies in Society and History. 20, 02 (1978). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417500008914.
[144]
Moravcsik, A. 1997. Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics. International Organization. 52, 1 (1997).
[145]
Morgenthau, H. 1948. The Political Science of E. H. Carr. World Politics. 1, 1 (1948), 127–134. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/2009162.
[146]
Morgenthau, H.J. 2006. A Realist Theory of International Politics. Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
[147]
Morgenthau, H.J. 2006. Different Methods of the Balance of Power. Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
[148]
Morgenthau, H.J. 1974. Scientific Man vs. Power Politics. University of Chicago Press.
[149]
Morgenthau, H.J. 2006. The Balance of Power. Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
[150]
Morton, Adam David, B., Andreas ; et al. 2001. The Gordian Knot of Agency-Structure in International Relations: A Neo-Gramscian Perspective. European Journal of International Relations. 7, 1 (2001).
[151]
Murphy, C.N. 1998. Understanding IR: Understanding Gramsci. Review Of International Studies. 24, 3 (1998).
[152]
Neumann, I.B. 2008. The Body of the Diplomat. European Journal of International Relations. 14, 4 (2008), 671–695. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066108097557.
[153]
Niebuhr, R. 2005. Moral Man and Immoral Society: A Study in Ethics and Politics. Continuum.
[154]
ÓTuathail, G. 2002. Theorizing Practical Geopolitical Reasoning: The Case of the United States’ Response to the War in Bosnia. Political Geography. 21, 5 (2002), 601–628. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0962-6298(02)00009-4.
[155]
Palan, R.P. and Blair, B.M. 1993. On the Idealist Origins of the Realist Theory of International Relations. Review of International Studies. 19, 04 (1993). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500118273.
[156]
Paul, T.V. 2016. Recasting Statecraft - International Relations and Strategies of Peaceful Change.
[157]
Powell, R. 1994. Anarchy in International Relations Theory: The Neorealist-Neoliberal Debate. International Organization. 48, 02 (1994). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300028204.
[158]
Price, R. and Reus-Smit, C. 1998. Dangerous Liaisons? Critical International Theory and Constructivism. European Journal of International Relations. 4, 3 (1998).
[159]
Reus-Smit, C. 2005. Constructivism. Theories of International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan. 188–212.
[160]
Rosecrance, R. 1987. Long Cycle Theory and International Relations. International Organization. 41, 2 (1987), 283–301. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027478.
[161]
Rosenberg, J. 1996. Isaac Deutscher and the Lost History of International Relations. New Left Review. 215 (1996).
[162]
Ruggie, J.G. 1982. International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order. International Organization. 36, 02 (1982). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300018993.
[163]
Ruggie, J.G. 1998. What Makes the World Hang Together? Neo-Utilitarianism and the Social Constructivist Challenge. International Organization. 52, 4 (1998).
[164]
Rupert, M. 1995. Producing Hegemony: The Politics of Mass Production and American Global Power. Cambridge University Press.
[165]
Said, E. 1991. The Scope of Orientalism. Orientalism. Penguin.
[166]
Santos, T.D. 1970. The Structure of Dependence. American Economic Review. 60, 2 (1970), 231–236.
[167]
Shaw, M. 2002. Post-Imperial and Quasi-Imperial: State and Empire in the Global Era. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 31, 2 (2002), 327–336. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298020310020701.
[168]
Simmons, B.A. and Hopkins, D.J. 2005. The Constraining Power of International Treaties: Theory and Methods. American Political Science Review. 99, 04 (2005). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055405051920.
[169]
Skjelsbæk, I. Sexual Violence and War: Mapping Out a Complex Relationship. European Journal of International Relations. 7, 2.
[170]
Slater, D. 1998. Post-Colonial Questions for Global Times. Review of International Political Economy. 5, 4 (1998), 647–678. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/096922998347417.
[171]
Slaughter, A.-M. 2004. A New World Order. Princeton University Press.
[172]
Smith, M.J. 1986. Realist Thought From Weber to Kissinger. London.
[173]
Snidal, D. 1985. The Limits of Hegemonic Stability Theory. International Organization. 39, 04 (1985). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S002081830002703X.
[174]
Sterling-Folker, J. 2000. Competing Paradigms or Birds of a Feather? Constructivism and Neoliberal Institutionalism Compared. International Studies Quarterly. 44, 1 (2000), 97–119. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/0020-8833.00150.
[175]
Stern, M. and Zalewski, M. 2009. Feminist Fatigue(s): Reflections on Feminism and Familiar Fables of Militarisation. Review of International Studies. 35, 03 (2009). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210509008675.
[176]
The Prince: 1505. https://web.archive.org/web/20060101054818/http://www.ilt.columbia.edu/publications/machiavelli.html.
[177]
Thucydides 1954. The Melian Dialogue. History of the Peloponnesian war. Penguin. 400–408.
[178]
Thucydides 1996. The Melian Dialogue. Classics of International Relations. Prentice Hall. 84–90.
[179]
Tickner, J.A. 1988. Hans Morgenthau’s Principles of Political Realism: A Feminist Reformulation. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 17, 3 (1988), 429–440. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298880170030801.
[180]
Tickner, J.A. 1997. You Just Don’t Understand: Troubled Engagements Between Feminists and IR Theorists. International Studies Quarterly. 41, 4 (1997), 611–632.
[181]
True, J. 2005. Feminism. Theories of International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan. 213–234.
[182]
Vasquez, J.A. 1998. The Power of Power Politics: From Classical Realism to Neotraditionalism. Cambridge University Press.
[183]
Vincent, R.J. 1988. Hedley Bull and Order in International Politics. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 17, 2 (1988), 195–213. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298880170020701.
[184]
Viotti, P.R. and Kauppi, M.V. 1999. Realism: The State, Power and the Balance of Power. International Relations Theory: Realism, Pluralism, Globalism, and Beyond. Allyn and Bacon. 35–67.
[185]
Wallerstein, I. 1974. The Modern World-System Vol. 1: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century. Academic.
[186]
Wallerstein, I. 1974. The Rise and Future Demise of the World Capitalist System: Concepts for Comparative Analysis. Comparative Studies in Society and History. 16, 4 (1974), 387–415. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417500007520.
[187]
Wallerstein, I. 1983. The Three Instances of Hegemony in the History of the Capitalist World-Economy. Comparative Sociology. 24, 1 (1983), 100–108. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1163/156854283X00071.
[188]
Waltz, K.N. 2001. Man, the State, and War: A Theoretical Analysis. Columbia University Press.
[189]
Waltz, K.N. 1979. Theory of International Politics. McGraw-Hill.
[190]
Wendt, A. 1992. Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics. International Organization. 46, 2 (1992), 391–425. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027764.
[191]
Wilson, P. 1998. The Myth of the ‘First Great Debate’. Review of International Studies. 24, 4 (1998), 1–15.
[192]
Wilson, W. 2014. The World Must be Made Safe for Democracy: The Fourteen Points. Essential Readings in World Politics. K.A. Mingst and J.L. Snyder (eds.), eds. W.W. Norton & Company. 4–6.
[193]
Wolfers, A. 1962. Discord and Collaboration: Essays on International Politics. Johns Hopkins University Press.
[194]
Youngs, G. 2004. Feminist International Relations: A Contradiction in Terms? Or: Why Women and Gender Are Essential to Understanding the World ‘We’ Live In*. International Affairs. 80, 1 (2004), 75–87. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2004.00367.x.
[195]
Zacher, M.W. and Matthew, R.A. 1995. Liberal International Theory: Common Threads, Divergent Strands. Controversies in International Relations Theory: Realism and the Neo-Liberal Challenge. Macmillan. 107–150.