Adler, E., ‘The Spread of Security Communities: Communities of Practice, Self-Restraint, and NATO’s Post--Cold War Transformation’, European Journal of International Relations, 14.2 (2008), 195–230 <https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066108089241>
Aron, Raymond, Peace and War: A Theory of International Relations (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1966)
Ashley, Richard K., ‘The Poverty of Neorealism’, International Organization, 38.02 (1984) <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300026709>
Autesserre, Séverine, ‘Hobbes and the Congo: Frames, Local Violence, and International Intervention’, International Organization, 63.02 (2009) <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818309090080>
Aydinli, Ersel, and Julie Mathews, ‘Periphery Theorising for a Truly Internationalised Discipline: Spinning IR Theory Out of Anatolia’, Review of International Studies, 34.04 (2008) <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210508008231>
Bagby, Laurie M. Johnson, ‘The Use and Abuse of Thucydides in International Relations’, International Organization, 48.01 (1994) <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300000849>
Baldwin, David A., ‘Neoliberalism, Neorealism, and World Politics’, in Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate (New York: Columbia University Press, 1993), New Directions in World Politics, 3–28
Barkawi, Tarak, and Mark Laffey, ‘Retrieving the Imperial: Empire and International Relations’, Millennium - Journal of International Studies, 31.1 (2002), 109–27 <https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298020310010601>
Bellamy, Alex J., International Society and Its Critics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005) <http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=13397529850002671&institutionId=2671&customerId=2670>
———, International Society and Its Critics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004) <http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=13397721050002671&institutionId=2671&customerId=2670>
———, International Society and Its Critics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005) <http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=13397720990002671&institutionId=2671&customerId=2670>
———, International Society and Its Critics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004) <http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=13397655180002671&institutionId=2671&customerId=2670>
Berki, R. N., ‘On Marxian Thought and the Problem of International Relations’, World Politics, 24.01 (1971), 80–105 <https://doi.org/10.2307/2009707>
Brown, Chris, ‘International Theory and International Society: The Viability of the Middle Way?’, Review of International Studies, 21.02 (1995) <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500117619>
———, ‘International Theory and International Society: The Viability of the Middle Way?’, Review of International Studies, 21.02 (1995) <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500117619>
Brown, Wendy, ‘Finding the Man in the State’, Feminist Studies, 18.1 (1992) <https://www.jstor.org/stable/3178212>
Bull, Hedley, ‘Order vs. Justice in International Society’, Political Studies, 19.3 (1971), 269–83 <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1971.tb00674.x>
———, The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics, 4th ed (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012)
———, ‘The Importance of Grotius in the Study of International Relations’, in Hugo Grotius and International Relations (Oxford: Clarendon, 1990), pp. 65–94 <http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=13407032680002671&institutionId=2671&customerId=2670>
Burnham, P., ‘The Communist Manifesto as International Relations Theory’, in The Communist Manifesto: New Interpretations (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1998)
Burnham, Peter, ‘Open Marxism and Vulgar International Political Economy’, Review of International Political Economy, 1.2 (1994), 221–31 <https://doi.org/10.1080/09692299408434277>
Buzan, Barry, From International to World Society?: English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), Cambridge studies in international relations <http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=13397655150002671&institutionId=2671&customerId=2670>
———, From International to World Society?: English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004) <http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=13397655140002671&institutionId=2671&customerId=2670>
Callinicos, A., ‘The Actuality of Imperialism’, Millennium - Journal of International Studies, 31.2 (2002), 319–26 <https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298020310020601>
Campbell, David, ‘Political Prosaics, Transversal Politics and the Anarchical World’, in Challenging Boundaries: Global Flows, Territorial Identities (Minneapolis, Minn: University of Minnesota Press, 1996), Borderlines
———, Politics Without Principle: Sovereignty, Ethics, and the Narratives of the Gulf War (Boulder, Colo: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1993), Critical perspectives on world politics
Carr, E. H., ‘The Nature of Politics’, in International Relations Theory: Realism, Pluralism, Globalism, and Beyond, 3rd ed (Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1999), pp. 562–66
Carr, Edward Hallett, and Michael Cox, The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 1919-1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations, 2nd ed (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2001)
Carver, Terrell, ‘War of the Worlds/Invasion of the Body Snatchers’, International Affairs (Royal Institute Of International Affairs 1944-), 80.1 (2004)
Carver, Terrell, Molly Cochran, and Judith Squires, ‘Gendering Jones: Feminisms, IRs, Masculinities’, Review Of International Studies, 24.2 (1998) <http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097523>
Chase-Dunn, Christopher, ‘Interstate System and Capitalist World-Economy: One Logic or Two?’, International Studies Quarterly, 25.1 (1981), 19–42 <https://doi.org/10.2307/2600209>
Claude, Inis L., Power and International Relations (New York: Random House, 2012)
Cox, Robert. W., ‘Gramsci, Hegemony and International Relations : An Essay in Method’, Millennium - Journal of International Studies, 12.2 (1983), 162–75 <https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298830120020701>
Cox, Robert W., ‘Social Forces, States and World Order’, in Neorealism and Its Critics (New York: Columbia University Press, 1986), New directions in world politics, 204–54
Cutler, Claire, ‘Locating “Authority” in the Global Political Economy’, International Studies Quarterly, 43.1 (1999), 59–81
Darby, Phillip, ‘Pursuing the Political: A Postcolonial Rethinking of Relations International’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 33.1 (2004)
———, ‘Reconfiguring “The International” Knowledge Machines, Boundaries, and Exclusions’, Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 28.1 (2003)
De Goede, Marieke, ‘The Politics of Preemption and the War on Terror in Europe’, European Journal of International Relations, 14.1 (2008), 161–85 <https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066107087764>
der Derian, James, ‘“The Boundaries of Knowledge and Power in International Relations” In: International/Intertextual Relations: Postmodern Readings of World Politics’, in International/Intertextual Relations: Postmodern Readings of World Politics (Lexington, Mass: Lexington Books, 1989), Issues in world politics series
Deudney, Daniel, and G. John Ikenberry, ‘The Nature and Sources of Liberal International Order’, Review Of International Studies, 25.2 (1999), 179–96 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097589>
Devetek, Richard, ‘Critical Theory’, in Theories of International Relations, 3rd Edition (Palgrave Macmillan, 2005), pp. 137–60 <http://lib.myilibrary.com/Open.aspx?id=85685>
Doty, Roxanne Lynn, ‘Foreign Policy as Social Construction: A Post-Positivist Analysis of U.S. Counterinsurgency Policy in the Philippines’, International Studies Quarterly, 37.3 (1993) <https://doi.org/10.2307/2600810>
Dougherty, James E., and Robert L. Pfaltzgraff, Contending Theories of International Relations: A Comprehensive Survey, 5th ed (New York: Longman, 2001)
Doyle, Michael W., ‘Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, 12.3 (1983), 205–35 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/2265298>
———, ‘Liberalism and World Politics’, American Political Science Review, 80.04 (1986), 1151–69 <https://doi.org/10.2307/1960861>
———, ‘Liberalism and World Politics’, American Political Science Review, 80.04 (1986), 1151–69 <https://doi.org/10.2307/1960861>
———, ‘Thucydidean Realism’, Review of International Studies, 16.03 (1990) <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500112483>
Dunne, Tim, ‘International Society: Theoretical Promises Fulfilled?’, Cooperation and Conflict, 30.2 (1995), 125–54 <https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836795030002002>
Dunne, Timothy, Milja Kurki, and Steve Smith, eds., International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, Fourth edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016)
Edkins, Jenny, Poststructuralism & International Relations: Bringing the Political Back In (Boulder, Colo: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1999), Critical perspectives on world politics
Edkins, Jenny, and Maja Zehfuss, ‘Generalising the International’, Review of International Studies, 31.03 (2005) <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210505006583>
Enloe, Cynthia, ‘Are Un Peacekeepers Real Men? And Other Post-Cold War Puzzles’, in The Morning After: Sexual Politics at the End of the Cold War (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993), pp. 10–37
———, ‘Bananas Militarized and Demilitarized’, in The Morning After: Sexual Politics at the End of the Cold War (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993), pp. 102–41
———, ‘“Gender” Is Not Enough: The Need for a Feminist Consciousness’, International Affairs, 80.1 (2004) <http://findit.royalholloway.ac.uk/primo_library/libweb/action/openurl?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft.jtitle=International+Affairs&rft.atitle=%27Gender%27+Is+Not+Enough%3A+The+Need+for+a+Feminist+Consciousness&rft.volume=80&rft.issn=00205850&rft.issue=1&rft.date=2004&rft.aufirst=Cynthia&rft.aulast=Enloe&vid=44ROY_Services_page&institution=44ROY&url_ctx_val=&url_ctx_fmt=null&isSerivcesPage=true>
Enloe, Cynthia H., Bananas, Beaches and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics (Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press, 2000)
Epstein, Charlotte, The Power of Words in International Relations: Birth of an Anti-Whaling Discourse (Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2008), Politics, science, and the environment
Fanon, Frantz, Richard Philcox, Jean-Paul Sartre, Homi K. Bhabha, and Cornel West, The Wretched of the Earth, 60th anniversary edition (New York: Grove Press, 2021)
Forde, Steven, ‘Varieties of Realism: Thucydides and Machiavelli’, The Journal of Politics, 54.2 (1992), 372–93 <https://doi.org/10.2307/2132031>
Foucault, Michel, ‘What Is An Author?’, in The Foucault Reader (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1991), pp. 101–20
Fukuyama, Francis, ‘The End of History?’, The National Interest, 16, 1989, 3–18 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/24027184>
Gale, Fred, ‘Cave ’Cave! Hic Dragones’ : A Neo-Gramscian Deconstruction and Reconstruction of International Regime Theory’, Review of International Political Economy, 5.2 (1998), 252–83 <https://doi.org/10.1080/096922998347561>
Gamble, Andrew, ‘Marxism After Communism: Beyond Realism and Historicism’, Review Of International Studies, 25.5 (1999), 27–144
Garst, Daniel, ‘Thucydides and Neorealism’, International Studies Quarterly, 33.1 (1989), 3–27 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600491>
Genest, Marc A., Conflict and Cooperation: Evolving Theories of International Relations, 2nd ed (Belmont, CA: Thomson/Wadsworth, 2004)
Germain, Randall D, and Michael Kenny, ‘Engaging Gramsci: International Relations Theory and the New Gramscians’, Review Of International Studies, 24.1 (1998)
Gill, Stephen, Gramsci, Historical Materialism and International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993), Cambridge studies in international relations
———, Gramsci, Historical Materialism and International Relations (Cambridge [England]: Cambridge University Press, 1993), Cambridge Studies in International Relations <http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=13397720900002671&institutionId=2671&customerId=2670>
Gill, Stephen, and David Law, ‘Marxism and the World System’, in The Global Political Economy: Perspectives, Problems, and Policies (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1988), pp. 54–70
Gill, Stephen R., and David Law, ‘Global Hegemony and the Structural Power of Capital’, International Studies Quarterly, 33.4 (1989), 475–199
Gills, B. K., ‘Historical Materialism and International Relations Theory’, Millennium - Journal of International Studies, 16.2 (1987), 265–70 <https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298870160020301>
Gilpin, Robert, ‘The Rise of American Hegemony’, in Britain 1846-1914 and the United States 1941-2001 (Ashgate Pub Ltd, 2002)
———, ‘The Rise of American Hegemony’, in Two Hegemonies: Britain 1846-1914 and the United States 1941-2001 (Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Ltd., 2002), pp. 165–82 <https://web.archive.org/web/20130323092826/https://www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel/ipe/gilpin.htm>
Gilpin, Robert G., ‘No One Loves a Political Realist’, Security Studies, 5.3 (1996), 3–26
———, ‘The Richness of the Tradition of Political Realism’, International Organization, 38.02 (1984) <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300026710>
Gilpin, Robert, and Jean M. Gilpin, The Political Economy of International Relations (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1987)
Goldgeier, James M., and Michael McFaul, ‘A Tale of Two Worlds: Core and Periphery in the Post-Cold War Era’, International Organization, 46.02 (1992) <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027788>
Grieco, Joseph M., ‘Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism’, in Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate (New York: Columbia University Press, 1993), New Directions in World Politics, 116–42
Grotius, Hugo, and A. C. Campbell, On the Laws of War and Peace (London, 1814) <https://web.archive.org/web/20171020013519/http://www.constitution.org/gro/djbp.htm>
Grotius, Hugo, and Stephen C. Neff, Hugo Grotius on the Law of War and Peace, Student ed (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012)
Grovogui, Siba N., ‘Regimes of Sovereignty: International Morality and the African Condition’, European Journal of International Relations, 8.3 (2002), 315–38
Grunberg, Isabelle, ‘Exploring the "Myth” of Hegemonic Stability’, International Organization, 44.04 (1990) <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300035372>
Gusterson, Hugh, ‘Nuclear Weapons and the Other in the Western Imagination’, in People of the Bomb: Portraits of America’s Nuclear Complex (Minneapolis, Minn: University of Minnesota Press, 2005), pp. 21–47
H. Herz, John, ‘Rise and Demise of The Territorial State’, World Politics, 9.4 (1957), 473–93 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/2009421?sid=primo&origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>
Halliday, Fred, ‘A Necessary Encounter: Historical Materialism and International Relations’, in Rethinking International Relations (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1994)
Haslam, Jonathan, No Virtue Like Necessity: Realist Thought in International Relations Since Machiavelli (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2002)
Herz, John H., ‘Power Politics and World Organization’, The American Political Science Review, 36.6 (1942) <https://doi.org/10.2307/1949064>
Hobbes, Thomas, ‘The Natural Conditions of Mankind’, in International Relations Theory: Realism, Pluralism, Globalism, and Beyond, 3rd ed (Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1999), pp. 94–98
Hobson, J. M., ‘The Enduring Place of Hierarchy in World Politics: Tracing the Social Logics of Hierarchy and Political Change’, European Journal of International Relations, 11.1 (2005), 63–98 <https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066105050137>
Hoffmann, Stanley, ‘An American Social Science: International Relations’, Daedalus, 106.3 (1977), 41–60 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/20024493>
———, ‘An American Social Science: International Relations’, in Janus and Minerva: Essays in the Theory and Practice of International Politics (Boulder: Westview, 1987), pp. 219–21
———, ‘Liberalism and International Affairs’, in Janus and Minerva: Essays in the Theory and Practice of International Politics (Boulder, 1987), pp. 394–417
Hopf, Ted, ‘The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory’, International Security, 23.1 (1998), 171–200 <https://doi.org/10.2307/2539267>
Howe, Paul, ‘The Utopian Realism of E. H. Carr’, Review of International Studies, 20.3 (1994), 277–97 <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500118078>
Hurrell, Andrew, ‘Order and Justice in International Relations: What Is at Stake?’, in Order and Justice in International Relations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003)
Ikenberry, G. John, ‘Liberal Internationalism 3.0: America and the Dilemmas of Liberal World Order’, Perspectives on Politics, 7.1 (2009), 71–87 <https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592709090112>
———, ‘Liberal Internationalism 3.0: America and the Dilemmas of Liberal World Order’, Perspectives on Politics, 7.01 (2009), 71–87 <https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592709090112>
Jackson, Robert, and Georg Sorensen, Introduction to International Relations: Theories and Approaches, Rev. and expanded 2nd ed (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003)
James, Alan, ‘The Realism of Realism: The State and the Study of International Relations’, Review of International Studies, 15.03 (1989) <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500112847>
Jervis, Robert, ‘Realism, Neoliberalism, and Cooperation: Understanding the Debate’, International Security, 24.1 (1999), 42–63 <https://doi.org/10.1162/016228899560040>
Jones, Adam, ‘Does “Gender” Make the World Go Round? Feminist Critiques of International Relations’, Review of International Studies, 22.04 (1996) <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500118649>
Kant, Immanuel, ‘An Answer to the Question: ‘What Is Enlightenment?’’, in Kant’s Political Writings (London: Cambridge University Press, 1970), Cambridge studies in the history and theory of politics
———, ‘Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch’, in Kant’s Political Writings (London: Cambridge University Press, 1970), Cambridge studies in the history and theory of politics
Katzenstein, Peter J, The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics (New York: Columbia University Press, 1996), New directions in world politics
Kegley, Charles W., and Shannon Lindsey Blanton, World Politics: Trend and Transformation (Boston, Mass: Wadsworth Cengage Learning, 2011)
Keohane, Robert O., After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2005) <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=5543821>
———, After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1984)
Keohane, Robert O, Neorealism and Its Critics (New York: Columbia University Press, 1986), New directions in world politics
Keohane, Robert O., and Joseph S. Nye, Power and Interdependence, 2nd ed ([S.l.]: HarperCollins, 1989)
———, ‘Power and Interdependence Revisited’, International Organization, 41.04 (1987) <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027661>
Kindleberger, Charles P., ‘Dominance and Leadership in the International Economy: Exploitation, Public Goods, and Free Rides’, International Studies Quarterly, 25.2 (1981) <https://doi.org/10.2307/2600355>
Krauthammer, Charles, ‘The Unipolar Moment’, in Rethinking America’s Security: Beyond Cold War to New World Order, 1st ed (New York: Norton, 1992), pp. 313–44
Krebs, R. R., and P. T. Jackson, ‘Twisting Tongues and Twisting Arms: The Power of Political Rhetoric’, European Journal of International Relations, 13.1 (2007), 35–66 <https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066107074284>
Krishna, Sankaran, ‘Race, Amnesia, and the Education of International Relations’, Alternatives, 26.4 (2001)
Lake, David A., ‘Leadership, Hegemony, and the International Economy: Naked Emperor or Tattered Monarch With Potential?’, International Studies Quarterly, 37.4 (1993) <http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600841>
Legro, Jeffrey W., and Andrew Moravcsik, ‘Is Anybody Still a Realist?’, International Security, 24.2 (1999), 5–55 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/2539248>
Lenin, V. I., Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism : A Popular Outline (Peking: Foreign Languages Press, 1973)
———, Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism : A Popular Outline (Peking: Foreign Languages Press, 1973)
———, ‘Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism: A Popular Outline’ (Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1963) <https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1916/imp-hsc/>
Ling, Lily H. M., ‘Hegemony and the Internationalizing State: A Post‐colonial Analysis of China’s Integration Into Asian Corporatism’, Review of International Political Economy, 3.1 (1996), 1–26 <https://doi.org/10.1080/09692299608434343>
Linklater, Andrew, ‘Dominant and Destructive Masculinities’, International Affairs, 80.1 (2004) <http://findit.royalholloway.ac.uk/primo_library/libweb/action/openurl?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft.jtitle=International+Affairs&rft.atitle=Dominant+and+Destructive+Masculinities&rft.volume=80&rft.issn=00205850&rft.issue=1&rft.date=2004&rft.aufirst=Andrew&rft.aulast=Linklater&vid=44ROY_Services_page&institution=44ROY&url_ctx_val=&url_ctx_fmt=null&isSerivcesPage=true>
———, ‘Marxism’, in Theories of International Relations, 3rd Edition (Palgrave Macmillan, 2005), pp. 110–36 <http://lib.myilibrary.com/Open.aspx?id=85685>
———, ‘Realism, Marxism and Critical International Theory’, Review of International Studies, 12.04 (1986) <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500113865>
———, ‘Realism, Marxism and Critical International Theory’, Review of International Studies, 12.4 (1986), 301–12 <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500113865>
Linklater, Andrew, ‘The Transformation of Political Community: E. H. Carr, Critical Theory and International Relations’, Review Of International Studies, 23.3 (1997)
Lynch, Cecelia, ‘E.H. Carr, International Relations Theory, and the Societal Origins of International Legal Norms’, Millennium - Journal of International Studies, 23.3 (1994), 589–619 <https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298940230030801>
Macchiavell, Niccolo, ‘Excerpts from “The Prince” in Classics of International Relations’, in Classics of International Relations, 3rd ed (Upper Saddle River, N.J: Prentice Hall, 1996), pp. 15–20
Machiavelli, Nicolo, and W. K. Marriott, ‘The Prince’, 1505 <https://web.archive.org/web/20060101054818/http://www.ilt.columbia.edu/publications/machiavelli.html>
Maclean, John, ‘Marxism and International Relations: A Strange Case of Mutual Neglect’, Millennium - Journal of International Studies, 17.2 (1988), 295–319 <https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298880170021201>
MacLean, John, ‘Marxist Epistemology, Explanations of “Change” and the Study of International Relations’, in Change and the Study of International Relations: The Evaded Dimension (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1981), pp. 46–67
Marx, Karl, Friedrich Engels, and Robert C. Tucker, ‘Economic and Philosophic Manuscript of 1844’, in The Marx-Engels Reader, 2d ed (New York: Norton, 1978), pp. 66–125
———, ‘Wage, Labour and Capital’, in The Marx-Engels Reader, 2d ed (New York: Norton, 1978), pp. 203–17
———, ‘Wage, Labour and Capital’, in The Marx-Engels Reader, 2d ed (New York: Norton, 1978), pp. 203–17
Marx, Karl, and Robert C. Tucker, ‘Economic and Philosophic Manuscript of 1844’, in The Marx-Engels Reader, 2d ed (New York: Norton, 1978), pp. 66–125
———, ‘Theories of Surplus Value’, in The Marx-Engels Reader, 2d ed (New York: Norton, 1978), pp. 443–68
Mastanduno, Michael, ‘Preserving the Unipolar Moment: Realist Theories and U.S. Grand Strategy After the Cold War’, International Security, 21.4 (1997) <https://doi.org/10.2307/2539283>
McClintock, Anne, ‘The Angel of Progress: Pitfalls of the Term “Post-Colonialism”’, Social Text, 31/32, 1992 <https://doi.org/10.2307/466219>
McKeown, Timothy J., ‘Hegemonic Stability Theory and 19th Century Tariff Levels in Europe’, International Organization, 37.01 (1983) <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300004203>
Mearsheimer, J. J., ‘E.H. Carr vs. Idealism: The Battle Rages On’, International Relations, 19.2 (2005), 139–52 <https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117805052810>
Mearsheimer, John J., ‘The False Promise of International Institutions’, International Security, 19.3 (1994) <https://doi.org/10.2307/2539078>
Merrington, John, ‘Theory and Practice in Gramsci’s Marxism’, in Western Marxism: A Critical Reader (London: Verso, 1978), pp. 140–75
Milliken, Jennifer, ‘The Study of Discourse in International Relations: A Critique of Research and Methods’, European Journal of International Relations, 5.2 (1999)
Milner, Helen, ‘International Theories of Cooperation Among Nations: Strengths and Weaknesses’, World Politics, 44.03 (1992), 466–96 <https://doi.org/10.2307/2010546>
Modelski, George, ‘The Long Cycle of Global Politics and the Nation-State’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, 20.02 (1978) <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417500008914>
Moravcsik, Andrew, ‘Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics’, International Organization, 52.1 (1997) <http://www.jstor.org/stable/2601333>
Morgenthau, Hans, ‘The Political Science of E. H. Carr’, World Politics, 1.1 (1948), 127–34 <https://doi.org/10.2307/2009162>
Morgenthau, Hans J., ‘A Realist Theory of International Politics’, in Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, 7th ed (Boston: McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 2006)
———, ‘Different Methods of the Balance of Power’, in Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, 7th ed (Boston: McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 2006)
———, ‘The Balance of Power’, in Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, 7th ed (Boston: McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 2006)
Morgenthau, Hans Joachim, Scientific Man vs. Power Politics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1974), Midway reprint
Morton, Adam David, Bieler, Andreas ;, Andreas Bieler, and Adam David Morton, ‘The Gordian Knot of Agency-Structure in International Relations: A Neo-Gramscian Perspective’, European Journal of International Relations, 7.1 (2001)
Murphy, Craig N., ‘Understanding IR: Understanding Gramsci’, Review Of International Studies, 24.3 (1998)
Neumann, I. B., ‘The Body of the Diplomat’, European Journal of International Relations, 14.4 (2008), 671–95 <https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066108097557>
Niebuhr, Reinhold, Moral Man and Immoral Society: A Study in Ethics and Politics (London: Continuum, 2005), Continuum impacts
ÓTuathail, Gearóid, ‘Theorizing Practical Geopolitical Reasoning: The Case of the United States’ Response to the War in Bosnia’, Political Geography, 21.5 (2002), 601–28 <https://doi.org/10.1016/S0962-6298(02)00009-4>
Palan, Ronen P., and Brook M. Blair, ‘On the Idealist Origins of the Realist Theory of International Relations’, Review of International Studies, 19.04 (1993) <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500118273>
Paul, T. V., ‘Recasting Statecraft - International Relations and Strategies of Peaceful Change’ (Atlanta, 2016) <http://www.tvpaul.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/ISA_Presidential_Address.pdf>
Powell, Robert, ‘Anarchy in International Relations Theory: The Neorealist-Neoliberal Debate’, International Organization, 48.02 (1994) <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300028204>
Price, Richard, and Christian Reus-Smit, ‘Dangerous Liaisons? Critical International Theory and Constructivism’, European Journal of International Relations, 4.3 (1998)
Reus-Smit, Christian, ‘Constructivism’, in Theories of International Relations, 3rd Edition (Palgrave Macmillan, 2005), pp. 188–212 <http://lib.myilibrary.com/Open.aspx?id=85685>
Rosecrance, Richard, ‘Long Cycle Theory and International Relations’, International Organization, 41.2 (1987), 283–301 <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027478>
Rosenberg, Justin, ‘Isaac Deutscher and the Lost History of International Relations’, New Left Review, 215, 1996 <https://newleftreview.org/issues/I215/articles/justin-rosenberg-isaac-deutscher-and-the-lost-history-of-international-relations>
Ruggie, John Gerard, ‘International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order’, International Organization, 36.02 (1982) <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300018993>
Ruggie, John Gerard, ‘What Makes the World Hang Together? Neo-Utilitarianism and the Social Constructivist Challenge’, International Organization, 52.4 (1998)
Rupert, Mark, Producing Hegemony: The Politics of Mass Production and American Global Power (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995), Cambridge studies in international relations
Said, Edward, ‘The Scope of Orientalism’, in Orientalism (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1991)
Santos, Theotonio Dos, ‘The Structure of Dependence’, American Economic Review, 60.2 (1970), 231–36
Shaw, Martin, ‘Post-Imperial and Quasi-Imperial: State and Empire in the Global Era’, Millennium - Journal of International Studies, 31.2 (2002), 327–36 <https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298020310020701>
Simmons, Beth A., and Daniel J. Hopkins, ‘The Constraining Power of International Treaties: Theory and Methods’, American Political Science Review, 99.04 (2005) <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055405051920>
Skjelsbæk, Inger, ‘Sexual Violence and War: Mapping Out a Complex Relationship’, European Journal of International Relations, 7.2 <http://findit.royalholloway.ac.uk/primo_library/libweb/action/openurl?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft.jtitle=European+Journal+of+International+Relations&rft.atitle=Sexual+Violence+and+War%3A+Mapping+Out+a+Complex+Relationship&rft.volume=7&rft.issn=13540661&rft.issue=2&rft.aufirst=Inger&rft.aulast=Skjelsb%C3%A6k&vid=44ROY_Services_page&institution=44ROY&url_ctx_val=&url_ctx_fmt=null&isSerivcesPage=true>
Slater, David, ‘Post-Colonial Questions for Global Times’, Review of International Political Economy, 5.4 (1998), 647–78 <https://doi.org/10.1080/096922998347417>
Slaughter, Anne-Marie, A New World Order (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2004)
Smith, Michael Joseph, Realist Thought From Weber to Kissinger (London, 1986)
Snidal, Duncan, ‘The Limits of Hegemonic Stability Theory’, International Organization, 39.04 (1985) <https://doi.org/10.1017/S002081830002703X>
Sterling-Folker, Jennifer, ‘Competing Paradigms or Birds of a Feather? Constructivism and Neoliberal Institutionalism Compared’, International Studies Quarterly, 44.1 (2000), 97–119 <https://doi.org/10.1111/0020-8833.00150>
Stern, Maria, and Marysia Zalewski, ‘Feminist Fatigue(s): Reflections on Feminism and Familiar Fables of Militarisation’, Review of International Studies, 35.03 (2009) <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210509008675>
Thucydides, ‘The Melian Dialogue’, in History of the Peloponnesian War (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1954), Penguin classics, 400–408
———, ‘The Melian Dialogue’, in Classics of International Relations, 3rd Edition (Upper Saddle River, N.J: Prentice Hall, 1996), pp. 84–90
Thucydides, and Richard Crawley, ‘History of the Peloponnesian War’ <http://people.ucalgary.ca/~vandersp/Courses/texts/thucydi1.html>
Tickner, J. Ann, ‘Hans Morgenthau’s Principles of Political Realism: A Feminist Reformulation’, Millennium - Journal of International Studies, 17.3 (1988), 429–40 <https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298880170030801>
———, ‘You Just Don’t Understand: Troubled Engagements Between Feminists and IR Theorists’, International Studies Quarterly, 41.4 (1997), 611–32 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600855?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>
True, Jacqui, ‘Feminism’, in Theories of International Relations, 3rd Edition (Palgrave Macmillan, 2005), pp. 213–34 <http://lib.myilibrary.com/Open.aspx?id=85685>
Vasquez, John A., The Power of Power Politics: From Classical Realism to Neotraditionalism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), Cambridge studies in international relations
Vincent, R.J., ‘Hedley Bull and Order in International Politics’, Millennium - Journal of International Studies, 17.2 (1988), 195–213 <https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298880170020701>
Viotti, Paul R., and Mark V. Kauppi, ‘Realism: The State, Power and the Balance of Power’, in International Relations Theory: Realism, Pluralism, Globalism, and Beyond, 3rd ed (Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1999), pp. 35–67
Wallerstein, Immanuel, The Modern World-System Vol. 1: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century (New York: Academic, 1974), Studies in Social Discontinuity
———, ‘The Rise and Future Demise of the World Capitalist System: Concepts for Comparative Analysis’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, 16.4 (1974), 387–415 <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417500007520>
———, ‘The Three Instances of Hegemony in the History of the Capitalist World-Economy’, Comparative Sociology, 24.1 (1983), 100–108 <https://doi.org/10.1163/156854283X00071>
Waltz, Kenneth N, Man, the State, and War: A Theoretical Analysis, New ed (New York: Columbia University Press, 2001)
Waltz, Kenneth N., Theory of International Politics (London: McGraw-Hill, 1979)
Wendt, Alexander, ‘Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics’, International Organization, 46.2 (1992), 391–425 <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027764>
Wilson, Peter, ‘The Myth of the “First Great Debate”’, Review of International Studies, 24.4 (1998), 1–15 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097558>
Wilson, Woodrow, ‘The World Must Be Made Safe for Democracy: The Fourteen Points’, in Essential Readings in World Politics, ed. by Karen A. Mingst and Jack L. Snyder (eds.), Fifth Edition (New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2014), The Norton series in world politics, 4–6
Wolfers, Arnold, Discord and Collaboration: Essays on International Politics (London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1962)
Youngs, Gillian, ‘Feminist International Relations: A Contradiction in Terms? Or: Why Women and Gender Are Essential to Understanding the World “We” Live In*’, International Affairs, 80.1 (2004), 75–87 <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2004.00367.x>
Zacher, Mark W., and Richard A. Matthew, ‘Liberal International Theory: Common Threads, Divergent Strands’, in Controversies in International Relations Theory: Realism and the Neo-Liberal Challenge (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1995), pp. 107–50
