Adler, E. ‘The Spread of Security Communities: Communities of Practice, Self-Restraint, and NATO’s Post--Cold War Transformation’. European Journal of International Relations 14.2 (2008): 195–230. Web.
Aron, Raymond. Peace and War: A Theory of International Relations. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1966. Print.
Ashley, Richard K. ‘The Poverty of Neorealism’. International Organization 38.02 (1984): n. pag. Web.
Autesserre, Séverine. ‘Hobbes and the Congo: Frames, Local Violence, and International Intervention’. International Organization 63.02 (2009): n. pag. Web.
Aydinli, Ersel, and Julie Mathews. ‘Periphery Theorising for a Truly Internationalised Discipline: Spinning IR Theory Out of Anatolia’. Review of International Studies 34.04 (2008): n. pag. Web.
Bagby, Laurie M. Johnson. ‘The Use and Abuse of Thucydides in International Relations’. International Organization 48.01 (1994): n. pag. Web.
Baldwin, David A. ‘Neoliberalism, Neorealism, and World Politics’. Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate. New Directions in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press, 1993. 3–28. Print.
Barkawi, Tarak, and Mark Laffey. ‘Retrieving the Imperial: Empire and International Relations’. Millennium - Journal of International Studies 31.1 (2002): 109–127. Web.
Bellamy, Alex J. International Society and Its Critics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. Web. <http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=13397529850002671&institutionId=2671&customerId=2670>.
---. International Society and Its Critics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004. Web. <http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=13397721050002671&institutionId=2671&customerId=2670>.
---. International Society and Its Critics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. Web. <http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=13397720990002671&institutionId=2671&customerId=2670>.
---. International Society and Its Critics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004. Web. <http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=13397655180002671&institutionId=2671&customerId=2670>.
Berki, R. N. ‘On Marxian Thought and the Problem of International Relations’. World Politics 24.01 (1971): 80–105. Web.
Brown, Chris. ‘International Theory and International Society: The Viability of the Middle Way?’ Review of International Studies 21.02 (1995): n. pag. Web.
---. ‘International Theory and International Society: The Viability of the Middle Way?’ Review of International Studies 21.02 (1995): n. pag. Web.
Brown, Wendy. ‘Finding the Man in the State’. Feminist Studies 18.1 (1992): n. pag. Web. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/3178212>.
Bull, Hedley. ‘Order vs. Justice in International Society’. Political Studies 19.3 (1971): 269–283. Web.
---. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. 4th ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012. Print.
---. ‘The Importance of Grotius in the Study of International Relations’. Hugo Grotius and International Relations. Oxford: Clarendon, 1990. 65–94. Web. <http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=13407032680002671&institutionId=2671&customerId=2670>.
Burnham, P. ‘The Communist Manifesto as International Relations Theory’. The Communist Manifesto: New Interpretations. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1998. Print.
Burnham, Peter. ‘Open Marxism and Vulgar International Political Economy’. Review of International Political Economy 1.2 (1994): 221–231. Web.
Buzan, Barry. From International to World Society?: English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. Web. <http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=13397655150002671&institutionId=2671&customerId=2670>.
---. From International to World Society?: English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. Web. <http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=13397655140002671&institutionId=2671&customerId=2670>.
Callinicos, A. ‘The Actuality of Imperialism’. Millennium - Journal of International Studies 31.2 (2002): 319–326. Web.
Campbell, David. ‘Political Prosaics, Transversal Politics and the Anarchical World’. Challenging Boundaries: Global Flows, Territorial Identities. Borderlines. Minneapolis, Minn: University of Minnesota Press, 1996. Print.
---. Politics Without Principle: Sovereignty, Ethics, and the Narratives of the Gulf War. Critical perspectives on world politics. Boulder, Colo: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1993. Print.
Carr, E. H. ‘The Nature of Politics’. International Relations Theory: Realism, Pluralism, Globalism, and Beyond. 3rd ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1999. 562–566. Print.
Carr, Edward Hallett, and Michael Cox. The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 1919-1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations. 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2001. Print.
Carver, Terrell. ‘War of the Worlds/Invasion of the Body Snatchers’. International Affairs (Royal Institute Of International Affairs 1944-) 80.1 (2004): n. pag. Print.
Carver, Terrell, Molly Cochran, and Judith Squires. ‘Gendering Jones: Feminisms, IRs, Masculinities’. Review Of International Studies 24.2 (1998): n. pag. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097523>.
Chase-Dunn, Christopher. ‘Interstate System and Capitalist World-Economy: One Logic or Two?’ International Studies Quarterly 25.1 (1981): 19–42. Web.
Claude, Inis L. Power and International Relations. New York: Random House, 2012. Print.
Cox, Robert. W. ‘Gramsci, Hegemony and International Relations : An Essay in Method’. Millennium - Journal of International Studies 12.2 (1983): 162–175. Web. <https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03058298830120020701>.
Cox, Robert W. ‘Social Forces, States and World Order’. Neorealism and Its Critics. New directions in world politics. New York: Columbia University Press, 1986. 204–254. Print.
Cutler, Claire. ‘Locating “Authority” in the Global Political Economy’. International Studies Quarterly 43.1 (1999): 59–81. Print.
Darby, Phillip. ‘Pursuing the Political: A Postcolonial Rethinking of Relations International’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 33.1 (2004): n. pag. Print.
---. ‘Reconfiguring “The International” Knowledge Machines, Boundaries, and Exclusions’. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 28.1 (2003): n. pag. Print.
De Goede, Marieke. ‘The Politics of Preemption and the War on Terror in Europe’. European Journal of International Relations 14.1 (2008): 161–185. Web.
der Derian, James. ‘“The Boundaries of Knowledge and Power in International Relations” In: International/Intertextual Relations: Postmodern Readings of World Politics’. International/Intertextual Relations: Postmodern Readings of World Politics. Issues in world politics series. Lexington, Mass: Lexington Books, 1989. Print.
Deudney, Daniel, and G. John Ikenberry. ‘The Nature and Sources of Liberal International Order’. Review Of International Studies 25.2 (1999): 179–196. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097589>.
Devetek, Richard. ‘Critical Theory’. Theories of International Relations. 3rd Edition. Palgrave Macmillan, 2005. 137–160. Web. <http://lib.myilibrary.com/Open.aspx?id=85685>.
Doty, Roxanne Lynn. ‘Foreign Policy as Social Construction: A Post-Positivist Analysis of U.S. Counterinsurgency Policy in the Philippines’. International Studies Quarterly 37.3 (1993): n. pag. Web.
Dougherty, James E., and Robert L. Pfaltzgraff. Contending Theories of International Relations: A Comprehensive Survey. 5th ed. New York: Longman, 2001. Print.
Doyle, Michael W. ‘Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs’. Philosophy & Public Affairs 12.3 (1983): 205–235. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/2265298>.
---. ‘Liberalism and World Politics’. American Political Science Review 80.04 (1986): 1151–1169. Web.
---. ‘Liberalism and World Politics’. American Political Science Review 80.04 (1986): 1151–1169. Web.
---. ‘Thucydidean Realism’. Review of International Studies 16.03 (1990): n. pag. Web.
Dunne, Tim. ‘International Society: Theoretical Promises Fulfilled?’ Cooperation and Conflict 30.2 (1995): 125–154. Web. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/45084151.pdf>.
Dunne, Timothy, Milja Kurki, and Steve Smith, eds. International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016. Print.
Edkins, Jenny. Poststructuralism & International Relations: Bringing the Political Back In. Critical perspectives on world politics. Boulder, Colo: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1999. Print.
Edkins, Jenny, and Maja Zehfuss. ‘Generalising the International’. Review of International Studies 31.03 (2005): n. pag. Web.
Enloe, Cynthia. ‘Are Un Peacekeepers Real Men? And Other Post-Cold War Puzzles’. The Morning After: Sexual Politics at the End of the Cold War. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993. 10–37. Print.
---. ‘Bananas Militarized and Demilitarized’. The Morning After: Sexual Politics at the End of the Cold War. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993. 102–141. Print.
---. ‘“Gender” Is Not Enough: The Need for a Feminist Consciousness’. International Affairs 80.1 (2004): n. pag. Web. <http://findit.royalholloway.ac.uk/primo_library/libweb/action/openurl?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft.jtitle=International+Affairs&rft.atitle=%27Gender%27+Is+Not+Enough%3A+The+Need+for+a+Feminist+Consciousness&rft.volume=80&rft.issn=00205850&rft.issue=1&rft.date=2004&rft.aufirst=Cynthia&rft.aulast=Enloe&vid=44ROY_Services_page&institution=44ROY&url_ctx_val=&url_ctx_fmt=null&isSerivcesPage=true>.
Enloe, Cynthia H. Bananas, Beaches and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics. Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press, 2000. Print.
Epstein, Charlotte. The Power of Words in International Relations: Birth of an Anti-Whaling Discourse. Politics, science, and the environment. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2008. Print.
Fanon, Frantz et al. The Wretched of the Earth. 60th anniversary edition. New York: Grove Press, 2021. Print.
Forde, Steven. ‘Varieties of Realism: Thucydides and Machiavelli’. The Journal of Politics 54.2 (1992): 372–393. Web.
Foucault, Michel. ‘What Is An Author?’ The Foucault Reader. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1991. 101–120. Print.
Fukuyama, Francis. ‘The End of History?’ The National Interest 16 (1989): 3–18. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/24027184>.
Gale, Fred. ‘Cave ’Cave! Hic Dragones’ : A Neo-Gramscian Deconstruction and Reconstruction of International Regime Theory’. Review of International Political Economy 5.2 (1998): 252–283. Web.
Gamble, Andrew. ‘Marxism After Communism: Beyond Realism and Historicism’. Review Of International Studies 25.5 (1999): 27–144. Print.
Garst, Daniel. ‘Thucydides and Neorealism’. International Studies Quarterly 33.1 (1989): 3–27. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600491>.
Genest, Marc A. Conflict and Cooperation: Evolving Theories of International Relations. 2nd ed. Belmont, CA: Thomson/Wadsworth, 2004. Print.
Germain, Randall D, and Michael Kenny. ‘Engaging Gramsci: International Relations Theory and the New Gramscians’. Review Of International Studies 24.1 (1998): n. pag. Print.
Gill, Stephen. Gramsci, Historical Materialism and International Relations. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993. Print.
---. Gramsci, Historical Materialism and International Relations. Cambridge Studies in International Relations. Cambridge [England]: Cambridge University Press, 1993. Web. <http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=13397720900002671&institutionId=2671&customerId=2670>.
Gill, Stephen, and David Law. ‘Marxism and the World System’. The Global Political Economy: Perspectives, Problems, and Policies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1988. 54–70. Print.
Gill, Stephen R., and David Law. ‘Global Hegemony and the Structural Power of Capital’. International Studies Quarterly 33.4 (1989): 475–199. Print.
Gills, B. K. ‘Historical Materialism and International Relations Theory’. Millennium - Journal of International Studies 16.2 (1987): 265–270. Web.
Gilpin, Robert. ‘The Rise of American Hegemony’. Britain 1846-1914 and the United States 1941-2001. Ashgate Pub Ltd, 2002. Print.
---. ‘The Rise of American Hegemony’. Two Hegemonies: Britain 1846-1914 and the United States 1941-2001. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Ltd., 2002. 165–182. Web. <https://web.archive.org/web/20130323092826/https://www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel/ipe/gilpin.htm>.
Gilpin, Robert G. ‘No One Loves a Political Realist’. Security Studies 5.3 (1996): 3–26. Print.
---. ‘The Richness of the Tradition of Political Realism’. International Organization 38.02 (1984): n. pag. Web.
Gilpin, Robert, and Jean M. Gilpin. The Political Economy of International Relations. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1987. Print.
Goldgeier, James M., and Michael McFaul. ‘A Tale of Two Worlds: Core and Periphery in the Post-Cold War Era’. International Organization 46.02 (1992): n. pag. Web.
Grieco, Joseph M. ‘Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism’. Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate. New Directions in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press, 1993. 116–142. Print.
Grotius, Hugo, and A. C. Campbell. On the Laws of War and Peace. London: N.p., 1814. Web. <https://web.archive.org/web/20171020013519/http://www.constitution.org/gro/djbp.htm>.
Grotius, Hugo, and Stephen C. Neff. Hugo Grotius on the Law of War and Peace. Student ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012. Print.
Grovogui, Siba N. ‘Regimes of Sovereignty: International Morality and the African Condition’. European Journal of International Relations 8.3 (2002): 315–338. Print.
Grunberg, Isabelle. ‘Exploring the "Myth” of Hegemonic Stability’. International Organization 44.04 (1990): n. pag. Web.
Gusterson, Hugh. ‘Nuclear Weapons and the Other in the Western Imagination’. People of the Bomb: Portraits of America’s Nuclear Complex. Minneapolis, Minn: University of Minnesota Press, 2005. 21–47. Print.
H. Herz, John. ‘Rise and Demise of The Territorial State’. World Politics 9.4 (1957): 473–493. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/2009421?sid=primo&origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>.
Halliday, Fred. ‘A Necessary Encounter: Historical Materialism and International Relations’. Rethinking International Relations. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1994. Print.
Haslam, Jonathan. No Virtue Like Necessity: Realist Thought in International Relations Since Machiavelli. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2002. Print.
Herz, John H. ‘Power Politics and World Organization’. The American Political Science Review 36.6 (1942): n. pag. Web.
Hobbes, Thomas. ‘The Natural Conditions of Mankind’. International Relations Theory: Realism, Pluralism, Globalism, and Beyond. 3rd ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1999. 94–98. Print.
Hobson, J. M. ‘The Enduring Place of Hierarchy in World Politics: Tracing the Social Logics of Hierarchy and Political Change’. European Journal of International Relations 11.1 (2005): 63–98. Web.
Hoffmann, Stanley. ‘An American Social Science: International Relations’. Daedalus 106.3 (1977): 41–60. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/20024493>.
---. ‘An American Social Science: International Relations’. Janus and Minerva: Essays in the Theory and Practice of International Politics. Boulder: Westview, 1987. 219–221. Print.
---. ‘Liberalism and International Affairs’. Janus and Minerva: Essays in the Theory and Practice of International Politics. Boulder: N.p., 1987. 394–417. Print.
Hopf, Ted. ‘The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory’. International Security 23.1 (1998): 171–200. Web.
Howe, Paul. ‘The Utopian Realism of E. H. Carr’. Review of International Studies 20.3 (1994): 277–297. Web.
Hurrell, Andrew. ‘Order and Justice in International Relations: What Is at Stake?’ Order and Justice in International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003. Print.
Ikenberry, G. John. ‘Liberal Internationalism 3.0: America and the Dilemmas of Liberal World Order’. Perspectives on Politics 7.1 (2009): 71–87. Web.
---. ‘Liberal Internationalism 3.0: America and the Dilemmas of Liberal World Order’. Perspectives on Politics 7.01 (2009): 71–87. Web.
Jackson, Robert, and Georg Sorensen. Introduction to International Relations: Theories and Approaches. Rev. and expanded 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003. Print.
James, Alan. ‘The Realism of Realism: The State and the Study of International Relations’. Review of International Studies 15.03 (1989): n. pag. Web.
Jervis, Robert. ‘Realism, Neoliberalism, and Cooperation: Understanding the Debate’. International Security 24.1 (1999): 42–63. Web.
Jones, Adam. ‘Does “Gender” Make the World Go Round? Feminist Critiques of International Relations’. Review of International Studies 22.04 (1996): n. pag. Web.
Kant, Immanuel. ‘An Answer to the Question: ‘What Is Enlightenment?’’. Kant’s Political Writings. Cambridge studies in the history and theory of politics. London: Cambridge University Press, 1970. Print.
---. ‘Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch’. Kant’s Political Writings. Cambridge studies in the history and theory of politics. London: Cambridge University Press, 1970. Print.
Katzenstein, Peter J. The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics. New directions in world politics. New York: Columbia University Press, 1996. Print.
Kegley, Charles W., and Shannon Lindsey Blanton. World Politics: Trend and Transformation. Boston, Mass: Wadsworth Cengage Learning, 2011. Print.
Keohane, Robert O. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2005. Web. <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=5543821>.
---. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1984. Print.
Keohane, Robert O. Neorealism and Its Critics. New directions in world politics. New York: Columbia University Press, 1986. Print.
Keohane, Robert O., and Joseph S. Nye. Power and Interdependence. 2nd ed. [S.l.]: HarperCollins, 1989. Print.
---. ‘Power and Interdependence Revisited’. International Organization 41.04 (1987): n. pag. Web.
Kindleberger, Charles P. ‘Dominance and Leadership in the International Economy: Exploitation, Public Goods, and Free Rides’. International Studies Quarterly 25.2 (1981): n. pag. Web.
Krauthammer, Charles. ‘The Unipolar Moment’. Rethinking America’s Security: Beyond Cold War to New World Order. 1st ed. New York: Norton, 1992. 313–344. Print.
Krebs, R. R., and P. T. Jackson. ‘Twisting Tongues and Twisting Arms: The Power of Political Rhetoric’. European Journal of International Relations 13.1 (2007): 35–66. Web.
Krishna, Sankaran. ‘Race, Amnesia, and the Education of International Relations’. Alternatives 26.4 (2001): n. pag. Print.
Lake, David A. ‘Leadership, Hegemony, and the International Economy: Naked Emperor or Tattered Monarch With Potential?’ International Studies Quarterly 37.4 (1993): n. pag. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600841>.
Legro, Jeffrey W., and Andrew Moravcsik. ‘Is Anybody Still a Realist?’ International Security 24.2 (1999): 5–55. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/2539248>.
Lenin, V. I. Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism : A Popular Outline. Peking: Foreign Languages Press, 1973. Print.
---. Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism : A Popular Outline. Peking: Foreign Languages Press, 1973. Print.
---. ‘Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism: A Popular Outline’. Progress Publishers, 1963. Web. <https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1916/imp-hsc/>.
Ling, Lily H. M. ‘Hegemony and the Internationalizing State: A Post‐colonial Analysis of China’s Integration Into Asian Corporatism’. Review of International Political Economy 3.1 (1996): 1–26. Web.
Linklater, Andrew. ‘Dominant and Destructive Masculinities’. International Affairs 80.1 (2004): n. pag. Web. <http://findit.royalholloway.ac.uk/primo_library/libweb/action/openurl?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft.jtitle=International+Affairs&rft.atitle=Dominant+and+Destructive+Masculinities&rft.volume=80&rft.issn=00205850&rft.issue=1&rft.date=2004&rft.aufirst=Andrew&rft.aulast=Linklater&vid=44ROY_Services_page&institution=44ROY&url_ctx_val=&url_ctx_fmt=null&isSerivcesPage=true>.
---. ‘Marxism’. Theories of International Relations. 3rd Edition. Palgrave Macmillan, 2005. 110–136. Web. <http://lib.myilibrary.com/Open.aspx?id=85685>.
---. ‘Realism, Marxism and Critical International Theory’. Review of International Studies 12.04 (1986): n. pag. Web.
---. ‘Realism, Marxism and Critical International Theory’. Review of International Studies 12.4 (1986): 301–312. Web.
Linklater, Andrew. ‘The Transformation of Political Community: E. H. Carr, Critical Theory and International Relations’. Review Of International Studies 23.3 (1997): n. pag. Print.
Lynch, Cecelia. ‘E.H. Carr, International Relations Theory, and the Societal Origins of International Legal Norms’. Millennium - Journal of International Studies 23.3 (1994): 589–619. Web. <https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03058298940230030801>.
Macchiavell, Niccolo. ‘Excerpts from “The Prince” in Classics of International Relations’. Classics of International Relations. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J: Prentice Hall, 1996. 15–20. Print.
Machiavelli, Nicolo, and W. K. Marriott. ‘The Prince’. N.p., 1505. Web. <https://web.archive.org/web/20060101054818/http://www.ilt.columbia.edu/publications/machiavelli.html>.
Maclean, John. ‘Marxism and International Relations: A Strange Case of Mutual Neglect’. Millennium - Journal of International Studies 17.2 (1988): 295–319. Web.
MacLean, John. ‘Marxist Epistemology, Explanations of “Change” and the Study of International Relations’. Change and the Study of International Relations: The Evaded Dimension. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1981. 46–67. Print.
Marx, Karl, Friedrich Engels, and Robert C. Tucker. ‘Economic and Philosophic Manuscript of 1844’. The Marx-Engels Reader. 2d ed. New York: Norton, 1978. 66–125. Print.
---. ‘Wage, Labour and Capital’. The Marx-Engels Reader. 2d ed. New York: Norton, 1978. 203–217. Print.
---. ‘Wage, Labour and Capital’. The Marx-Engels Reader. 2d ed. New York: Norton, 1978. 203–217. Print.
Marx, Karl, and Robert C. Tucker. ‘Economic and Philosophic Manuscript of 1844’. The Marx-Engels Reader. 2d ed. New York: Norton, 1978. 66–125. Print.
---. ‘Theories of Surplus Value’. The Marx-Engels Reader. 2d ed. New York: Norton, 1978. 443–468. Print.
Mastanduno, Michael. ‘Preserving the Unipolar Moment: Realist Theories and U.S. Grand Strategy After the Cold War’. International Security 21.4 (1997): n. pag. Web.
McClintock, Anne. ‘The Angel of Progress: Pitfalls of the Term “Post-Colonialism”’. Social Text 31/32 (1992): n. pag. Web.
McKeown, Timothy J. ‘Hegemonic Stability Theory and 19th Century Tariff Levels in Europe’. International Organization 37.01 (1983): n. pag. Web.
Mearsheimer, J. J. ‘E.H. Carr vs. Idealism: The Battle Rages On’. International Relations 19.2 (2005): 139–152. Web.
Mearsheimer, John J. ‘The False Promise of International Institutions’. International Security 19.3 (1994): n. pag. Web.
Merrington, John. ‘Theory and Practice in Gramsci’s Marxism’. Western Marxism: A Critical Reader. London: Verso, 1978. 140–175. Print.
Milliken, Jennifer. ‘The Study of Discourse in International Relations: A Critique of Research and Methods’. European Journal of International Relations 5.2 (1999): n. pag. Print.
Milner, Helen. ‘International Theories of Cooperation Among Nations: Strengths and Weaknesses’. World Politics 44.03 (1992): 466–496. Web.
Modelski, George. ‘The Long Cycle of Global Politics and the Nation-State’. Comparative Studies in Society and History 20.02 (1978): n. pag. Web.
Moravcsik, Andrew. ‘Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics’. International Organization 52.1 (1997): n. pag. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/2601333>.
Morgenthau, Hans. ‘The Political Science of E. H. Carr’. World Politics 1.1 (1948): 127–134. Web.
Morgenthau, Hans J. ‘A Realist Theory of International Politics’. Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. 7th ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 2006. Print.
---. ‘Different Methods of the Balance of Power’. Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. 7th ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 2006. Print.
---. ‘The Balance of Power’. Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. 7th ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 2006. Print.
Morgenthau, Hans Joachim. Scientific Man vs. Power Politics. Midway reprint. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1974. Print.
Morton, Adam David, Bieler, Andreas ;, Andreas Bieler, and Adam David Morton. ‘The Gordian Knot of Agency-Structure in International Relations: A Neo-Gramscian Perspective’. European Journal of International Relations 7.1 (2001): n. pag. Print.
Murphy, Craig N. ‘Understanding IR: Understanding Gramsci’. Review Of International Studies 24.3 (1998): n. pag. Print.
Neumann, I. B. ‘The Body of the Diplomat’. European Journal of International Relations 14.4 (2008): 671–695. Web.
Niebuhr, Reinhold. Moral Man and Immoral Society: A Study in Ethics and Politics. Continuum impacts. London: Continuum, 2005. Print.
ÓTuathail, Gearóid. ‘Theorizing Practical Geopolitical Reasoning: The Case of the United States’ Response to the War in Bosnia’. Political Geography 21.5 (2002): 601–628. Web.
Palan, Ronen P., and Brook M. Blair. ‘On the Idealist Origins of the Realist Theory of International Relations’. Review of International Studies 19.04 (1993): n. pag. Web.
Paul, T. V. ‘Recasting Statecraft - International Relations and Strategies of Peaceful Change’. 2016. Web. <http://www.tvpaul.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/ISA_Presidential_Address.pdf>.
Powell, Robert. ‘Anarchy in International Relations Theory: The Neorealist-Neoliberal Debate’. International Organization 48.02 (1994): n. pag. Web.
Price, Richard, and Christian Reus-Smit. ‘Dangerous Liaisons? Critical International Theory and Constructivism’. European Journal of International Relations 4.3 (1998): n. pag. Print.
Reus-Smit, Christian. ‘Constructivism’. Theories of International Relations. 3rd Edition. Palgrave Macmillan, 2005. 188–212. Web. <http://lib.myilibrary.com/Open.aspx?id=85685>.
Rosecrance, Richard. ‘Long Cycle Theory and International Relations’. International Organization 41.2 (1987): 283–301. Web.
Rosenberg, Justin. ‘Isaac Deutscher and the Lost History of International Relations’. New Left Review 215 (1996): n. pag. Web. <https://newleftreview.org/issues/I215/articles/justin-rosenberg-isaac-deutscher-and-the-lost-history-of-international-relations>.
Ruggie, John Gerard. ‘International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order’. International Organization 36.02 (1982): n. pag. Web.
Ruggie, John Gerard. ‘What Makes the World Hang Together? Neo-Utilitarianism and the Social Constructivist Challenge’. International Organization 52.4 (1998): n. pag. Print.
Rupert, Mark. Producing Hegemony: The Politics of Mass Production and American Global Power. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995. Print.
Said, Edward. ‘The Scope of Orientalism’. Orientalism. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1991. Print.
Santos, Theotonio Dos. ‘The Structure of Dependence’. American Economic Review 60.2 (1970): 231–236. Print.
Shaw, Martin. ‘Post-Imperial and Quasi-Imperial: State and Empire in the Global Era’. Millennium - Journal of International Studies 31.2 (2002): 327–336. Web.
Simmons, Beth A., and Daniel J. Hopkins. ‘The Constraining Power of International Treaties: Theory and Methods’. American Political Science Review 99.04 (2005): n. pag. Web.
Skjelsbæk, Inger. ‘Sexual Violence and War: Mapping Out a Complex Relationship’. European Journal of International Relations 7.2 n. pag. Web. <http://findit.royalholloway.ac.uk/primo_library/libweb/action/openurl?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft.jtitle=European+Journal+of+International+Relations&rft.atitle=Sexual+Violence+and+War%3A+Mapping+Out+a+Complex+Relationship&rft.volume=7&rft.issn=13540661&rft.issue=2&rft.aufirst=Inger&rft.aulast=Skjelsb%C3%A6k&vid=44ROY_Services_page&institution=44ROY&url_ctx_val=&url_ctx_fmt=null&isSerivcesPage=true>.
Slater, David. ‘Post-Colonial Questions for Global Times’. Review of International Political Economy 5.4 (1998): 647–678. Web.
Slaughter, Anne-Marie. A New World Order. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2004. Print.
Smith, Michael Joseph. Realist Thought From Weber to Kissinger. London, 1986. Print.
Snidal, Duncan. ‘The Limits of Hegemonic Stability Theory’. International Organization 39.04 (1985): n. pag. Web.
Sterling-Folker, Jennifer. ‘Competing Paradigms or Birds of a Feather? Constructivism and Neoliberal Institutionalism Compared’. International Studies Quarterly 44.1 (2000): 97–119. Web.
Stern, Maria, and Marysia Zalewski. ‘Feminist Fatigue(s): Reflections on Feminism and Familiar Fables of Militarisation’. Review of International Studies 35.03 (2009): n. pag. Web.
Thucydides. ‘The Melian Dialogue’. History of the Peloponnesian War. Penguin classics. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1954. 400–408. Print.
---. ‘The Melian Dialogue’. Classics of International Relations. 3rd Edition. Upper Saddle River, N.J: Prentice Hall, 1996. 84–90. Print.
Thucydides, and Richard Crawley. ‘History of the Peloponnesian War’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://people.ucalgary.ca/~vandersp/Courses/texts/thucydi1.html>.
Tickner, J. Ann. ‘Hans Morgenthau’s Principles of Political Realism: A Feminist Reformulation’. Millennium - Journal of International Studies 17.3 (1988): 429–440. Web. <https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/03058298880170030801>.
---. ‘You Just Don’t Understand: Troubled Engagements Between Feminists and IR Theorists’. International Studies Quarterly 41.4 (1997): 611–632. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600855?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>.
True, Jacqui. ‘Feminism’. Theories of International Relations. 3rd Edition. Palgrave Macmillan, 2005. 213–234. Web. <http://lib.myilibrary.com/Open.aspx?id=85685>.
Vasquez, John A. The Power of Power Politics: From Classical Realism to Neotraditionalism. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998. Print.
Vincent, R.J. ‘Hedley Bull and Order in International Politics’. Millennium - Journal of International Studies 17.2 (1988): 195–213. Web. <https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/03058298880170020701>.
Viotti, Paul R., and Mark V. Kauppi. ‘Realism: The State, Power and the Balance of Power’. International Relations Theory: Realism, Pluralism, Globalism, and Beyond. 3rd ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1999. 35–67. Print.
Wallerstein, Immanuel. The Modern World-System Vol. 1: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century. Studies in Social Discontinuity. New York: Academic, 1974. Print.
---. ‘The Rise and Future Demise of the World Capitalist System: Concepts for Comparative Analysis’. Comparative Studies in Society and History 16.4 (1974): 387–415. Web.
---. ‘The Three Instances of Hegemony in the History of the Capitalist World-Economy’. Comparative Sociology 24.1 (1983): 100–108. Web.
Waltz, Kenneth N. Man, the State, and War: A Theoretical Analysis. New ed. New York: Columbia University Press, 2001. Print.
Waltz, Kenneth N. Theory of International Politics. London: McGraw-Hill, 1979. Print.
Wendt, Alexander. ‘Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics’. International Organization 46.2 (1992): 391–425. Web.
Wilson, Peter. ‘The Myth of the “First Great Debate”’. Review of International Studies 24.4 (1998): 1–15. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097558>.
Wilson, Woodrow. ‘The World Must Be Made Safe for Democracy: The Fourteen Points’. Essential Readings in World Politics. Ed. Karen A. Mingst and Jack L. Snyder (eds.). Fifth Edition. The Norton series in world politics. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2014. 4–6. Print.
Wolfers, Arnold. Discord and Collaboration: Essays on International Politics. London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1962. Print.
Youngs, Gillian. ‘Feminist International Relations: A Contradiction in Terms? Or: Why Women and Gender Are Essential to Understanding the World “We” Live In*’. International Affairs 80.1 (2004): 75–87. Web.
Zacher, Mark W., and Richard A. Matthew. ‘Liberal International Theory: Common Threads, Divergent Strands’. Controversies in International Relations Theory: Realism and the Neo-Liberal Challenge. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1995. 107–150. Print.
