[1]
E. H. Carr and M. Cox, The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 1919-1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations, 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2001.
[2]
J. J. Mearsheimer, ‘E.H. Carr vs. Idealism: The Battle Rages On’, International Relations, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 139–152, 2005, doi: 10.1177/0047117805052810.
[3]
T. V. Paul, ‘Recasting Statecraft - International Relations and Strategies of Peaceful Change’, vol. Presidential Address International Studies Association (ISA), 57th Annual Convention. Atlanta, 2016 [Online]. Available: http://www.tvpaul.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/ISA_Presidential_Address.pdf
[4]
P. Howe, ‘The Utopian Realism of E. H. Carr’, Review of International Studies, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 277–297, 1994, doi: 10.1017/S0260210500118078.
[5]
H. Morgenthau, ‘The Political Science of E. H. Carr’, World Politics, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 127–134, 1948, doi: 10.2307/2009162.
[6]
P. Wilson, ‘The Myth of the “First Great Debate”’, Review of International Studies, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 1–15, 1998 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097558
[7]
G. J. Ikenberry, ‘Liberal Internationalism 3.0: America and the Dilemmas of Liberal World Order’, Perspectives on Politics, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 71–87, 2009, doi: 10.1017/S1537592709090112.
[8]
R. O. Keohane and J. S. Nye, Power and Interdependence, 2nd ed. [S.l.]: HarperCollins, 1989.
[9]
R. O. Keohane and J. S. Nye, ‘Power and Interdependence Revisited’, International Organization, vol. 41, no. 04, 1987, doi: 10.1017/S0020818300027661.
[10]
M. W. Doyle, ‘Liberalism and World Politics’, American Political Science Review, vol. 80, no. 04, pp. 1151–1169, 1986, doi: 10.2307/1960861.
[11]
D. Deudney and G. J. Ikenberry, ‘The Nature and Sources of Liberal International Order’, Review Of International Studies, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 179–196, 1999 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097589
[12]
M. W. Doyle, ‘Liberalism and World Politics’, American Political Science Review, vol. 80, no. 04, pp. 1151–1169, 1986, doi: 10.2307/1960861.
[13]
F. Fukuyama, ‘The End of History?’, The National Interest, no. 16, pp. 3–18, 1989 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/24027184
[14]
G. J. Ikenberry, ‘Liberal Internationalism 3.0: America and the Dilemmas of Liberal World Order’, Perspectives on Politics, vol. 7, no. 01, pp. 71–87, 2009, doi: 10.1017/S1537592709090112.
[15]
A.-M. Slaughter, A New World Order. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2004.
[16]
A. Moravcsik, ‘Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics’, International Organization, vol. 52, no. 1, 1997 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2601333
[17]
M. W. Zacher and R. A. Matthew, ‘Liberal International Theory: Common Threads, Divergent Strands’, in Controversies in International Relations Theory: Realism and the Neo-Liberal Challenge, Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1995, pp. 107–150.
[18]
W. Wilson, ‘The World Must be Made Safe for Democracy: The Fourteen Points’, in Essential Readings in World Politics, Fifth Edition., vol. The Norton series in world politics, K. A. Mingst and J. L. Snyder (eds.), Eds. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2014, pp. 4–6.
[19]
I. Kant, ‘An Answer to the Question: ‘What is Enlightenment?’’, in Kant’s Political Writings, vol. Cambridge studies in the history and theory of politics, London: Cambridge University Press, 1970.
[20]
I. Kant, ‘Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch’, in Kant’s Political Writings, vol. Cambridge studies in the history and theory of politics, London: Cambridge University Press, 1970.
[21]
J. M. Grieco, ‘Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism’, in Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate, vol. New Directions in World Politics, New York: Columbia University Press, 1993, pp. 116–142.
[22]
D. A. Baldwin, ‘Neoliberalism, Neorealism, and World Politics’, in Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate, vol. New Directions in World Politics, New York: Columbia University Press, 1993, pp. 3–28.
[23]
S. Hoffmann, ‘Liberalism and International Affairs’, in Janus and Minerva: Essays in the Theory and Practice of International Politics, Boulder, 1987, pp. 394–417.
[24]
M. W. Doyle, ‘Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 205–235, 1983 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2265298
[25]
M. A. Genest, Conflict and Cooperation: Evolving Theories of International Relations, 2nd ed. Belmont, CA: Thomson/Wadsworth, 2004.
[26]
C. W. Kegley and S. L. Blanton, World Politics: Trend and Transformation. Boston, Mass: Wadsworth Cengage Learning, 2011.
[27]
R. Jackson and G. Sorensen, Introduction to International Relations: Theories and Approaches, Rev. and Expanded 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
[28]
H. J. Morgenthau, ‘A Realist Theory of International Politics’, in Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, 7th ed., Boston: McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 2006.
[29]
H. J. Morgenthau, ‘The Balance of Power’, in Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, 7th ed., Boston: McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 2006.
[30]
H. J. Morgenthau, ‘Different Methods of the Balance of Power’, in Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, 7th ed., Boston: McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 2006.
[31]
S. Forde, ‘Varieties of Realism: Thucydides and Machiavelli’, The Journal of Politics, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 372–393, 1992, doi: 10.2307/2132031.
[32]
K. N. Waltz, Man, the State, and War: A Theoretical Analysis, New ed. New York: Columbia University Press, 2001.
[33]
H. J. Morgenthau, Scientific Man vs. Power Politics, vol. Midway reprint. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1974.
[34]
R. Niebuhr, Moral Man and Immoral Society: A Study in Ethics and Politics, vol. Continuum impacts. London: Continuum, 2005.
[35]
I. L. Claude, Power and International Relations. New York: Random House, 2012.
[36]
R. Aron, Peace and War: A Theory of International Relations. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1966.
[37]
R. P. Palan and B. M. Blair, ‘On the Idealist Origins of the Realist Theory of International Relations’, Review of International Studies, vol. 19, no. 04, 1993, doi: 10.1017/S0260210500118273.
[38]
P. R. Viotti and M. V. Kauppi, ‘Realism: The State, Power and the Balance of Power’, in International Relations Theory: Realism, Pluralism, Globalism, and Beyond, 3rd ed., Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1999, pp. 35–67.
[39]
E. H. Carr, ‘The Nature of Politics’, in International Relations Theory: Realism, Pluralism, Globalism, and Beyond, 3rd ed., Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1999, pp. 562–566.
[40]
J. E. Dougherty and R. L. Pfaltzgraff, Contending Theories of International Relations: A Comprehensive Survey, 5th ed. New York: Longman, 2001.
[41]
J. A. Vasquez, The Power of Power Politics: From Classical Realism to Neotraditionalism, vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
[42]
J. Haslam, No Virtue Like Necessity: Realist Thought in International Relations Since Machiavelli. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2002.
[43]
M. J. Smith, Realist Thought From Weber to Kissinger. London, 1986.
[44]
M. W. Doyle, ‘Thucydidean Realism’, Review of International Studies, vol. 16, no. 03, 1990, doi: 10.1017/S0260210500112483.
[45]
D. Garst, ‘Thucydides and Neorealism’, International Studies Quarterly, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 3–27, 1989 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600491
[46]
L. M. J. Bagby, ‘The Use and Abuse of Thucydides in International Relations’, International Organization, vol. 48, no. 01, 1994, doi: 10.1017/S0020818300000849.
[47]
Thucydides, ‘The Melian Dialogue’, in History of the Peloponnesian war, vol. Penguin classics, Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1954, pp. 400–408.
[48]
Thucydides, ‘The Melian Dialogue’, in Classics of International Relations, 3rd Edition., Upper Saddle River, N.J: Prentice Hall, 1996, pp. 84–90.
[49]
Thucydides and R. Crawley, ‘History of the Peloponnesian War’. [Online]. Available: http://people.ucalgary.ca/~vandersp/Courses/texts/thucydi1.html
[50]
N. Macchiavell, ‘Excerpts from “The Prince” in Classics of International Relations’, in Classics of International Relations, 3rd ed., Upper Saddle River, N.J: Prentice Hall, 1996, pp. 15–20.
[51]
N. Machiavelli and W. K. Marriott, ‘The Prince’, 1505. [Online]. Available: https://web.archive.org/web/20060101054818/http://www.ilt.columbia.edu/publications/machiavelli.html
[52]
T. Hobbes, ‘The Natural Conditions of Mankind’, in International Relations Theory: Realism, Pluralism, Globalism, and Beyond, 3rd ed., Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1999, pp. 94–98.
[53]
R. G. Gilpin, ‘The Richness of the Tradition of Political Realism’, International Organization, vol. 38, no. 02, 1984, doi: 10.1017/S0020818300026710.
[54]
R. G. Gilpin, ‘No One Loves a Political Realist’, Security Studies, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 3–26, 1996.
[55]
J. H. Herz, ‘Power Politics and World Organization’, The American Political Science Review, vol. 36, no. 6, 1942, doi: 10.2307/1949064.
[56]
J. H. Herz, ‘Rise and Demise of The Territorial State’, World Politics, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 473–493, 1957 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2009421?sid=primo&origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[57]
S. Hoffmann, ‘An American Social Science: International Relations’, Daedalus, vol. 106, no. 3, pp. 41–60, 1977 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20024493
[58]
S. Hoffmann, ‘An American Social Science: International Relations’, in Janus and Minerva: Essays in the Theory and Practice of International Politics, Boulder: Westview, 1987, pp. 219–221.
[59]
A. James, ‘The Realism of Realism: The State and the Study of International Relations’, Review of International Studies, vol. 15, no. 03, 1989, doi: 10.1017/S0260210500112847.
[60]
A. Wolfers, Discord and Collaboration: Essays on International Politics. London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1962.
[61]
K. N. Waltz, Theory of International Politics. London: McGraw-Hill, 1979.
[62]
R. O. Keohane, Neorealism and Its Critics, vol. New directions in world politics. New York: Columbia University Press, 1986.
[63]
R. Rosecrance, ‘Long Cycle Theory and International Relations’, International Organization, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 283–301, 1987, doi: 10.1017/S0020818300027478.
[64]
T. Dunne, M. Kurki, and S. Smith, Eds., International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.
[65]
R. Powell, ‘Anarchy in International Relations Theory: The Neorealist-Neoliberal Debate’, International Organization, vol. 48, no. 02, 1994, doi: 10.1017/S0020818300028204.
[66]
G. Modelski, ‘The Long Cycle of Global Politics and the Nation-State’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, vol. 20, no. 02, 1978, doi: 10.1017/S0010417500008914.
[67]
C. Krauthammer, ‘The Unipolar Moment’, in Rethinking America’s Security: Beyond Cold War to New World Order, 1st ed., New York: Norton, 1992, pp. 313–344.
[68]
M. Mastanduno, ‘Preserving the Unipolar Moment: Realist Theories and U.S. Grand Strategy After the Cold War’, International Security, vol. 21, no. 4, 1997, doi: 10.2307/2539283.
[69]
R. O. Keohane, After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2005 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=5543821
[70]
R. O. Keohane, After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1984.
[71]
J. J. Mearsheimer, ‘The False Promise of International Institutions’, International Security, vol. 19, no. 3, 1994, doi: 10.2307/2539078.
[72]
J. W. Legro and A. Moravcsik, ‘Is Anybody Still a Realist?’, International Security, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 5–55, 1999 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2539248
[73]
R. Jervis, ‘Realism, Neoliberalism, and Cooperation: Understanding the Debate’, International Security, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 42–63, 1999, doi: 10.1162/016228899560040.
[74]
R. Gilpin, ‘The Rise of American Hegemony’, in Britain 1846-1914 and the United States 1941-2001, Ashgate Pub Ltd, 2002.
[75]
R. Gilpin, ‘The Rise of American Hegemony’, in Two Hegemonies: Britain 1846-1914 and the United States 1941-2001, Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Ltd., 2002, pp. 165–182 [Online]. Available: https://web.archive.org/web/20130323092826/https://www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel/ipe/gilpin.htm
[76]
I. Grunberg, ‘Exploring the "Myth” of Hegemonic Stability’, International Organization, vol. 44, no. 04, 1990, doi: 10.1017/S0020818300035372.
[77]
J. G. Ruggie, ‘International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order’, International Organization, vol. 36, no. 02, 1982, doi: 10.1017/S0020818300018993.
[78]
H. Milner, ‘International Theories of Cooperation Among Nations: Strengths and Weaknesses’, World Politics, vol. 44, no. 03, pp. 466–496, 1992, doi: 10.2307/2010546.
[79]
B. A. Simmons and D. J. Hopkins, ‘The Constraining Power of International Treaties: Theory and Methods’, American Political Science Review, vol. 99, no. 04, 2005, doi: 10.1017/S0003055405051920.
[80]
C. P. Kindleberger, ‘Dominance and Leadership in the International Economy: Exploitation, Public Goods, and Free Rides’, International Studies Quarterly, vol. 25, no. 2, 1981, doi: 10.2307/2600355.
[81]
D. Snidal, ‘The Limits of Hegemonic Stability Theory’, International Organization, vol. 39, no. 04, 1985, doi: 10.1017/S002081830002703X.
[82]
D. A. Lake, ‘Leadership, Hegemony, and the International Economy: Naked Emperor or Tattered Monarch With Potential?’, International Studies Quarterly, vol. 37, no. 4, 1993 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600841
[83]
T. J. McKeown, ‘Hegemonic Stability Theory and 19th Century Tariff Levels in Europe’, International Organization, vol. 37, no. 01, 1983, doi: 10.1017/S0020818300004203.
[84]
H. Bull, The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics, 4th ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.
[85]
J. Edkins and M. Zehfuss, ‘Generalising the International’, Review of International Studies, vol. 31, no. 03, 2005, doi: 10.1017/S0260210505006583.
[86]
T. Dunne, ‘International Society: Theoretical Promises Fulfilled?’, Cooperation and Conflict, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 125–154, 1995, doi: 10.1177/0010836795030002002. [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/45084151.pdf
[87]
A. J. Bellamy, International Society and Its Critics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005 [Online]. Available: http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=13397529850002671&institutionId=2671&customerId=2670
[88]
A. J. Bellamy, International Society and Its Critics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004 [Online]. Available: http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=13397721050002671&institutionId=2671&customerId=2670
[89]
H. Bull, ‘Order vs. Justice in International Society’, Political Studies, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 269–283, 1971, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.1971.tb00674.x.
[90]
A. Hurrell, ‘Order and Justice in International Relations: What is at Stake?’, in Order and Justice in International Relations, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
[91]
A. J. Bellamy, International Society and Its Critics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005 [Online]. Available: http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=13397720990002671&institutionId=2671&customerId=2670
[92]
A. J. Bellamy, International Society and Its Critics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004 [Online]. Available: http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=13397655180002671&institutionId=2671&customerId=2670
[93]
C. Brown, ‘International Theory and International Society: The Viability of the Middle Way?’, Review of International Studies, vol. 21, no. 02, 1995, doi: 10.1017/S0260210500117619.
[94]
C. Brown, ‘International Theory and International Society: The Viability of the Middle Way?’, Review of International Studies, vol. 21, no. 02, 1995, doi: 10.1017/S0260210500117619.
[95]
A. Linklater, ‘The Transformation of Political Community: E. H. Carr, Critical Theory and International Relations’, Review Of International Studies, vol. 23, no. 3, 1997.
[96]
C. Lynch, ‘E.H. Carr, International Relations Theory, and the Societal Origins of International Legal Norms’, Millennium - Journal of International Studies, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 589–619, 1994, doi: 10.1177/03058298940230030801. [Online]. Available: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03058298940230030801
[97]
R. J. Vincent, ‘Hedley Bull and Order in International Politics’, Millennium - Journal of International Studies, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 195–213, 1988, doi: 10.1177/03058298880170020701. [Online]. Available: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/03058298880170020701
[98]
B. Buzan, From International to World Society?: English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation, vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004 [Online]. Available: http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=13397655150002671&institutionId=2671&customerId=2670
[99]
B. Buzan, From International to World Society?: English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004 [Online]. Available: http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=13397655140002671&institutionId=2671&customerId=2670
[100]
H. Grotius and S. C. Neff, Hugo Grotius on the Law of War and Peace, Student ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
[101]
H. Grotius and A. C. Campbell, On the Laws of War and Peace. London, 1814 [Online]. Available: https://web.archive.org/web/20171020013519/http://www.constitution.org/gro/djbp.htm
[102]
H. Bull, ‘The Importance of Grotius in the Study of International Relations’, in Hugo Grotius and International Relations, Oxford: Clarendon, 1990, pp. 65–94 [Online]. Available: http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=13407032680002671&institutionId=2671&customerId=2670
[103]
A. Linklater, ‘Marxism’, in Theories of International Relations, 3rd Edition., Palgrave Macmillan, 2005, pp. 110–136 [Online]. Available: http://lib.myilibrary.com/Open.aspx?id=85685
[104]
R. Gilpin and J. M. Gilpin, The Political Economy of International Relations. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1987.
[105]
B. K. Gills, ‘Historical Materialism and International Relations Theory’, Millennium - Journal of International Studies, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 265–270, 1987, doi: 10.1177/03058298870160020301.
[106]
K. Marx, F. Engels, and R. C. Tucker, ‘Economic and Philosophic Manuscript of 1844’, in The Marx-Engels Reader, 2d ed., New York: Norton, 1978, pp. 66–125.
[107]
K. Marx, F. Engels, and R. C. Tucker, ‘Wage, Labour and Capital’, in The Marx-Engels Reader, 2d ed., New York: Norton, 1978, pp. 203–217.
[108]
A. Linklater, ‘Realism, Marxism and Critical International Theory’, Review of International Studies, vol. 12, no. 04, 1986, doi: 10.1017/S0260210500113865.
[109]
J. Maclean, ‘Marxism and International Relations: A Strange Case of Mutual Neglect’, Millennium - Journal of International Studies, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 295–319, 1988, doi: 10.1177/03058298880170021201.
[110]
P. Burnham, ‘Open Marxism and Vulgar International Political Economy’, Review of International Political Economy, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 221–231, 1994, doi: 10.1080/09692299408434277.
[111]
K. Marx and R. C. Tucker, ‘Economic and Philosophic Manuscript of 1844’, in The Marx-Engels Reader, 2d ed., New York: Norton, 1978, pp. 66–125.
[112]
K. Marx, F. Engels, and R. C. Tucker, ‘Wage, Labour and Capital’, in The Marx-Engels Reader, 2d ed., New York: Norton, 1978, pp. 203–217.
[113]
K. Marx and R. C. Tucker, ‘Theories of Surplus Value’, in The Marx-Engels Reader, 2d ed., New York: Norton, 1978, pp. 443–468.
[114]
V. I. Lenin, Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism : A Popular Outline. Peking: Foreign Languages Press, 1973.
[115]
J. Rosenberg, ‘Isaac Deutscher and the Lost History of International Relations’, New Left Review, no. 215, 1996 [Online]. Available: https://newleftreview.org/issues/I215/articles/justin-rosenberg-isaac-deutscher-and-the-lost-history-of-international-relations
[116]
R. N. Berki, ‘On Marxian Thought and the Problem of International Relations’, World Politics, vol. 24, no. 01, pp. 80–105, 1971, doi: 10.2307/2009707.
[117]
P. Burnham, ‘The Communist Manifesto as International Relations Theory’, in The Communist Manifesto: New Interpretations, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1998.
[118]
F. Halliday, ‘A Necessary Encounter: Historical Materialism and International Relations’, in Rethinking International Relations, Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1994.
[119]
A. Gamble, ‘Marxism After Communism: Beyond Realism and Historicism’, Review Of International Studies, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 27–144, 1999.
[120]
C. Cutler, ‘Locating “Authority” in the Global Political Economy’, International Studies Quarterly, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 59–81, 1999.
[121]
J. MacLean, ‘Marxist Epistemology, Explanations of “Change” and the Study of International Relations’, in Change and the Study of International Relations: The Evaded Dimension, New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1981, pp. 46–67.
[122]
A. Linklater, ‘Realism, Marxism and Critical International Theory’, Review of International Studies, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 301–312, 1986, doi: 10.1017/S0260210500113865.
[123]
I. Wallerstein, ‘The Rise and Future Demise of the World Capitalist System: Concepts for Comparative Analysis’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 387–415, 1974, doi: 10.1017/S0010417500007520.
[124]
S. Gill and D. Law, ‘Marxism and the World System’, in The Global Political Economy: Perspectives, Problems, and Policies, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1988, pp. 54–70.
[125]
S. R. Gill and D. Law, ‘Global Hegemony and the Structural Power of Capital’, International Studies Quarterly, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 475–199, 1989.
[126]
R. W. Cox, ‘Social Forces, States and World Order’, in Neorealism and Its Critics, vol. New directions in world politics, New York: Columbia University Press, 1986, pp. 204–254.
[127]
V. I. Lenin, Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism : A Popular Outline. Peking: Foreign Languages Press, 1973.
[128]
V. I. Lenin, ‘Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism: A Popular Outline’, 1963. [Online]. Available: https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1916/imp-hsc/
[129]
I. Wallerstein, The Modern World-System Vol. 1: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century, vol. Studies in Social Discontinuity. New York: Academic, 1974.
[130]
I. Wallerstein, ‘The Three Instances of Hegemony in the History of the Capitalist World-Economy’, Comparative Sociology, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 100–108, 1983, doi: 10.1163/156854283X00071.
[131]
C. Chase-Dunn, ‘Interstate System and Capitalist World-Economy: One Logic or Two?’, International Studies Quarterly, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 19–42, 1981, doi: 10.2307/2600209.
[132]
T. D. Santos, ‘The Structure of Dependence’, American Economic Review, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 231–236, 1970.
[133]
J. Merrington, ‘Theory and Practice in Gramsci’s Marxism’, in Western Marxism: A Critical Reader, London: Verso, 1978, pp. 140–175.
[134]
Robert. W. Cox, ‘Gramsci, Hegemony and International Relations : An Essay in Method’, Millennium - Journal of International Studies, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 162–175, 1983, doi: 10.1177/03058298830120020701. [Online]. Available: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03058298830120020701
[135]
R. D. Germain and M. Kenny, ‘Engaging Gramsci: International Relations Theory and the New Gramscians’, Review Of International Studies, vol. 24, no. 1, 1998.
[136]
C. N. Murphy, ‘Understanding IR: Understanding Gramsci’, Review Of International Studies, vol. 24, no. 3, 1998.
[137]
F. Gale, ‘Cave ’Cave! Hic Dragones’ : A Neo-Gramscian Deconstruction and Reconstruction of International Regime Theory’, Review of International Political Economy, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 252–283, 1998, doi: 10.1080/096922998347561.
[138]
S. Gill, Gramsci, Historical Materialism and International Relations, vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
[139]
S. Gill, Gramsci, Historical Materialism and International Relations, vol. Cambridge Studies in International Relations. Cambridge [England]: Cambridge University Press, 1993 [Online]. Available: http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=13397720900002671&institutionId=2671&customerId=2670
[140]
M. Rupert, Producing Hegemony: The Politics of Mass Production and American Global Power, vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
[141]
B. Morton, Adam David Andreas ;, A. Bieler, and A. D. Morton, ‘The Gordian Knot of Agency-Structure in International Relations: A Neo-Gramscian Perspective’, European Journal of International Relations, vol. 7, no. 1, 2001.
[142]
C. Reus-Smit, ‘Constructivism’, in Theories of International Relations, 3rd Edition., Palgrave Macmillan, 2005, pp. 188–212 [Online]. Available: http://lib.myilibrary.com/Open.aspx?id=85685
[143]
A. Wendt, ‘Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics’, International Organization, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 391–425, 1992, doi: 10.1017/S0020818300027764.
[144]
T. Hopf, ‘The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory’, International Security, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 171–200, 1998, doi: 10.2307/2539267.
[145]
P. J. Katzenstein, The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics, vol. New directions in world politics. New York: Columbia University Press, 1996.
[146]
J. Sterling-Folker, ‘Competing Paradigms or Birds of a Feather? Constructivism and Neoliberal Institutionalism Compared’, International Studies Quarterly, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 97–119, 2000, doi: 10.1111/0020-8833.00150.
[147]
R. R. Krebs and P. T. Jackson, ‘Twisting Tongues and Twisting Arms: The Power of Political Rhetoric’, European Journal of International Relations, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 35–66, 2007, doi: 10.1177/1354066107074284.
[148]
J. M. Hobson, ‘The Enduring Place of Hierarchy in World Politics: Tracing the Social Logics of Hierarchy and Political Change’, European Journal of International Relations, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 63–98, 2005, doi: 10.1177/1354066105050137.
[149]
J. G. Ruggie, ‘What Makes the World Hang Together? Neo-Utilitarianism and the Social Constructivist Challenge’, International Organization, vol. 52, no. 4, 1998.
[150]
E. Adler, ‘The Spread of Security Communities: Communities of Practice, Self-Restraint, and NATO’s Post--Cold War Transformation’, European Journal of International Relations, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 195–230, 2008, doi: 10.1177/1354066108089241.
[151]
S. Autesserre, ‘Hobbes and the Congo: Frames, Local Violence, and International Intervention’, International Organization, vol. 63, no. 02, 2009, doi: 10.1017/S0020818309090080.
[152]
R. Price and C. Reus-Smit, ‘Dangerous Liaisons? Critical International Theory and Constructivism’, European Journal of International Relations, vol. 4, no. 3, 1998.
[153]
R. Devetek, ‘Critical Theory’, in Theories of International Relations, 3rd Edition., Palgrave Macmillan, 2005, pp. 137–160 [Online]. Available: http://lib.myilibrary.com/Open.aspx?id=85685
[154]
J. Edkins, Poststructuralism & International Relations: Bringing the Political Back In, vol. Critical perspectives on world politics. Boulder, Colo: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1999.
[155]
M. Foucault, ‘What Is An Author?’, in The Foucault Reader, Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1991, pp. 101–120.
[156]
C. Epstein, The Power of Words in International Relations: Birth of an Anti-Whaling Discourse, vol. Politics, science, and the environment. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2008.
[157]
S. N. Grovogui, ‘Regimes of Sovereignty: International Morality and the African Condition’, European Journal of International Relations, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 315–338, 2002.
[158]
E. Said, ‘The Scope of Orientalism’, in Orientalism, Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1991.
[159]
H. Gusterson, ‘Nuclear Weapons and the Other in the Western Imagination’, in People of the Bomb: Portraits of America’s Nuclear Complex, Minneapolis, Minn: University of Minnesota Press, 2005, pp. 21–47.
[160]
Milliken, Jennifer, ‘The Study of Discourse in International Relations: A Critique of Research and Methods’, European Journal of International Relations, vol. 5, no. 2, 1999.
[161]
G. ÓTuathail, ‘Theorizing Practical Geopolitical Reasoning: The Case of the United States’ Response to the War in Bosnia’, Political Geography, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 601–628, 2002, doi: 10.1016/S0962-6298(02)00009-4.
[162]
D. Campbell, ‘Political Prosaics, Transversal Politics and the Anarchical World’, in Challenging Boundaries: Global Flows, Territorial Identities, vol. Borderlines, Minneapolis, Minn: University of Minnesota Press, 1996.
[163]
R. L. Doty, ‘Foreign Policy as Social Construction: A Post-Positivist Analysis of U.S. Counterinsurgency Policy in the Philippines’, International Studies Quarterly, vol. 37, no. 3, 1993, doi: 10.2307/2600810.
[164]
R. K. Ashley, ‘The Poverty of Neorealism’, International Organization, vol. 38, no. 02, 1984, doi: 10.1017/S0020818300026709.
[165]
D. Campbell, Politics Without Principle: Sovereignty, Ethics, and the Narratives of the Gulf War, vol. Critical perspectives on world politics. Boulder, Colo: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1993.
[166]
J. der Derian, ‘“The Boundaries of Knowledge and Power in International Relations” In: International/Intertextual Relations: Postmodern Readings of World Politics’, in International/Intertextual Relations: Postmodern Readings of World Politics, vol. Issues in world politics series, Lexington, Mass: Lexington Books, 1989.
[167]
I. B. Neumann, ‘The Body of the Diplomat’, European Journal of International Relations, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 671–695, 2008, doi: 10.1177/1354066108097557.
[168]
M. De Goede, ‘The Politics of Preemption and the War on Terror in Europe’, European Journal of International Relations, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 161–185, 2008, doi: 10.1177/1354066107087764.
[169]
P. Darby, ‘Pursuing the Political: A Postcolonial Rethinking of Relations International’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, vol. 33, no. 1, 2004.
[170]
S. Krishna, ‘Race, Amnesia, and the Education of International Relations’, Alternatives, vol. 26, no. 4, 2001.
[171]
F. Fanon, R. Philcox, J.-P. Sartre, H. K. Bhabha, and C. West, The Wretched of the Earth, 60th anniversary edition. New York: Grove Press, 2021.
[172]
P. Darby, ‘Reconfiguring “The International” Knowledge Machines, Boundaries, and Exclusions’, Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, vol. 28, no. 1, 2003.
[173]
T. Barkawi and M. Laffey, ‘Retrieving the Imperial: Empire and International Relations’, Millennium - Journal of International Studies, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 109–127, 2002, doi: 10.1177/03058298020310010601.
[174]
A. Callinicos, ‘The Actuality of Imperialism’, Millennium - Journal of International Studies, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 319–326, 2002, doi: 10.1177/03058298020310020601.
[175]
M. Shaw, ‘Post-Imperial and Quasi-Imperial: State and Empire in the Global Era’, Millennium - Journal of International Studies, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 327–336, 2002, doi: 10.1177/03058298020310020701.
[176]
D. Slater, ‘Post-Colonial Questions for Global Times’, Review of International Political Economy, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 647–678, 1998, doi: 10.1080/096922998347417.
[177]
L. H. M. Ling, ‘Hegemony and the Internationalizing State: A Post‐colonial Analysis of China’s Integration Into Asian Corporatism’, Review of International Political Economy, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–26, 1996, doi: 10.1080/09692299608434343.
[178]
A. McClintock, ‘The Angel of Progress: Pitfalls of the Term “Post-Colonialism”’, Social Text, no. 31/32, 1992, doi: 10.2307/466219.
[179]
J. M. Goldgeier and M. McFaul, ‘A Tale of Two Worlds: Core and Periphery in the Post-Cold War Era’, International Organization, vol. 46, no. 02, 1992, doi: 10.1017/S0020818300027788.
[180]
E. Aydinli and J. Mathews, ‘Periphery Theorising for a Truly Internationalised Discipline: Spinning IR Theory Out of Anatolia’, Review of International Studies, vol. 34, no. 04, 2008, doi: 10.1017/S0260210508008231.
[181]
J. True, ‘Feminism’, in Theories of International Relations, 3rd Edition., Palgrave Macmillan, 2005, pp. 213–234 [Online]. Available: http://lib.myilibrary.com/Open.aspx?id=85685
[182]
J. A. Tickner, ‘You Just Don’t Understand: Troubled Engagements Between Feminists and IR Theorists’, International Studies Quarterly, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 611–632, 1997 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600855?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[183]
C. Enloe, ‘Are Un Peacekeepers Real Men? and Other Post-Cold War Puzzles’, in The Morning After: Sexual Politics at the End of the Cold War, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993, pp. 10–37.
[184]
C. Enloe, ‘Bananas Militarized and Demilitarized’, in The Morning After: Sexual Politics at the End of the Cold War, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993, pp. 102–141.
[185]
M. Stern and M. Zalewski, ‘Feminist Fatigue(s): Reflections on Feminism and Familiar Fables of Militarisation’, Review of International Studies, vol. 35, no. 03, 2009, doi: 10.1017/S0260210509008675.
[186]
I. Skjelsbæk, ‘Sexual Violence and War: Mapping Out a Complex Relationship’, European Journal of International Relations, vol. 7, no. 2 [Online]. Available: http://findit.royalholloway.ac.uk/primo_library/libweb/action/openurl?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft.jtitle=European+Journal+of+International+Relations&rft.atitle=Sexual+Violence+and+War%3A+Mapping+Out+a+Complex+Relationship&rft.volume=7&rft.issn=13540661&rft.issue=2&rft.aufirst=Inger&rft.aulast=Skjelsb%C3%A6k&vid=44ROY_Services_page&institution=44ROY&url_ctx_val=&url_ctx_fmt=null&isSerivcesPage=true
[187]
C. H. Enloe, Bananas, Beaches and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics. Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press, 2000.
[188]
A. Jones, ‘Does “Gender” Make the World Go Round? Feminist Critiques of International Relations’, Review of International Studies, vol. 22, no. 04, 1996, doi: 10.1017/S0260210500118649.
[189]
T. Carver, M. Cochran, and J. Squires, ‘Gendering Jones: Feminisms, IRs, Masculinities’, Review Of International Studies, vol. 24, no. 2, 1998 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097523
[190]
J. A. Tickner, ‘Hans Morgenthau’s Principles of Political Realism: A Feminist Reformulation’, Millennium - Journal of International Studies, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 429–440, 1988, doi: 10.1177/03058298880170030801. [Online]. Available: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/03058298880170030801
[191]
W. Brown, ‘Finding the Man in the State’, Feminist Studies, vol. 18, no. 1, 1992 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3178212
[192]
G. Youngs, ‘Feminist International Relations: A Contradiction in Terms? Or: Why Women and Gender Are Essential to Understanding the World “We” Live In*’, International Affairs, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 75–87, 2004, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2346.2004.00367.x.
[193]
A. Linklater, ‘Dominant and Destructive Masculinities’, International Affairs, vol. 80, no. 1, 2004 [Online]. Available: http://findit.royalholloway.ac.uk/primo_library/libweb/action/openurl?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft.jtitle=International+Affairs&rft.atitle=Dominant+and+Destructive+Masculinities&rft.volume=80&rft.issn=00205850&rft.issue=1&rft.date=2004&rft.aufirst=Andrew&rft.aulast=Linklater&vid=44ROY_Services_page&institution=44ROY&url_ctx_val=&url_ctx_fmt=null&isSerivcesPage=true
[194]
T. Carver, ‘War of the Worlds/Invasion of the Body Snatchers’, International Affairs (Royal Institute Of International Affairs 1944-), vol. 80, no. 1, 2004.
[195]
C. Enloe, ‘“Gender” Is Not Enough: The Need for a Feminist Consciousness’, International Affairs, vol. 80, no. 1, 2004 [Online]. Available: http://findit.royalholloway.ac.uk/primo_library/libweb/action/openurl?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft.jtitle=International+Affairs&rft.atitle=%27Gender%27+Is+Not+Enough%3A+The+Need+for+a+Feminist+Consciousness&rft.volume=80&rft.issn=00205850&rft.issue=1&rft.date=2004&rft.aufirst=Cynthia&rft.aulast=Enloe&vid=44ROY_Services_page&institution=44ROY&url_ctx_val=&url_ctx_fmt=null&isSerivcesPage=true
