Adler, E. 2008. ‘The Spread of Security Communities: Communities of Practice, Self-Restraint, and NATO’s Post--Cold War Transformation’. European Journal of International Relations 14 (2): 195–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066108089241.
Aron, Raymond. 1966. Peace and War: A Theory of International Relations. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
Ashley, Richard K. 1984. ‘The Poverty of Neorealism’. International Organization 38 (02). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300026709.
Autesserre, Séverine. 2009. ‘Hobbes and the Congo: Frames, Local Violence, and International Intervention’. International Organization 63 (02). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818309090080.
Aydinli, Ersel, and Julie Mathews. 2008. ‘Periphery Theorising for a Truly Internationalised Discipline: Spinning IR Theory Out of Anatolia’. Review of International Studies 34 (04). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210508008231.
Bagby, Laurie M. Johnson. 1994. ‘The Use and Abuse of Thucydides in International Relations’. International Organization 48 (01). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300000849.
Baldwin, David A. 1993. ‘Neoliberalism, Neorealism, and World Politics’. In Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate, New Directions in World Politics:3–28. New York: Columbia University Press.
Barkawi, Tarak, and Mark Laffey. 2002. ‘Retrieving the Imperial: Empire and International Relations’. Millennium - Journal of International Studies 31 (1): 109–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298020310010601.
Bellamy, Alex J. 2004a. International Society and Its Critics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=13397721050002671&institutionId=2671&customerId=2670.
———. 2004b. International Society and Its Critics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=13397655180002671&institutionId=2671&customerId=2670.
———. 2005a. International Society and Its Critics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=13397529850002671&institutionId=2671&customerId=2670.
———. 2005b. International Society and Its Critics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=13397720990002671&institutionId=2671&customerId=2670.
Berki, R. N. 1971. ‘On Marxian Thought and the Problem of International Relations’. World Politics 24 (01): 80–105. https://doi.org/10.2307/2009707.
Brown, Chris. 1995a. ‘International Theory and International Society: The Viability of the Middle Way?’ Review of International Studies 21 (02). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500117619.
———. 1995b. ‘International Theory and International Society: The Viability of the Middle Way?’ Review of International Studies 21 (02). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500117619.
Brown, Wendy. 1992. ‘Finding the Man in the State’. Feminist Studies 18 (1). https://www.jstor.org/stable/3178212.
Bull, Hedley. 1971. ‘Order vs. Justice in International Society’. Political Studies 19 (3): 269–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1971.tb00674.x.
———. 1990. ‘The Importance of Grotius in the Study of International Relations’. In Hugo Grotius and International Relations, 65–94. Oxford: Clarendon. http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=13407032680002671&institutionId=2671&customerId=2670.
———. 2012. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. 4th ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Burnham, P. 1998. ‘The Communist Manifesto as International Relations Theory’. In The Communist Manifesto: New Interpretations. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Burnham, Peter. 1994. ‘Open Marxism and Vulgar International Political Economy’. Review of International Political Economy 1 (2): 221–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692299408434277.
Buzan, Barry. 2004a. From International to World Society?: English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation. Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=13397655150002671&institutionId=2671&customerId=2670.
———. 2004b. From International to World Society?: English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=13397655140002671&institutionId=2671&customerId=2670.
Callinicos, A. 2002. ‘The Actuality of Imperialism’. Millennium - Journal of International Studies 31 (2): 319–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298020310020601.
Campbell, David. 1993. Politics Without Principle: Sovereignty, Ethics, and the Narratives of the Gulf War. Vol. Critical perspectives on world politics. Boulder, Colo: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
———. 1996. ‘Political Prosaics, Transversal Politics and the Anarchical World’. In Challenging Boundaries: Global Flows, Territorial Identities. Vol. Borderlines. Minneapolis, Minn: University of Minnesota Press.
Carr, E. H. 1999. ‘The Nature of Politics’. In International Relations Theory: Realism, Pluralism, Globalism, and Beyond, 3rd ed, 562–66. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Carr, Edward Hallett, and Michael Cox. 2001. The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 1919-1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations. 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Carver, Terrell. 2004. ‘War of the Worlds/Invasion of the Body Snatchers’. International Affairs (Royal Institute Of International Affairs 1944-) 80 (1).
Carver, Terrell, Molly Cochran, and Judith Squires. 1998. ‘Gendering Jones: Feminisms, IRs, Masculinities’. Review Of International Studies 24 (2). http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097523.
Chase-Dunn, Christopher. 1981. ‘Interstate System and Capitalist World-Economy: One Logic or Two?’ International Studies Quarterly 25 (1): 19–42. https://doi.org/10.2307/2600209.
Claude, Inis L. 2012. Power and International Relations. New York: Random House.
Cox, Robert. W. 1983. ‘Gramsci, Hegemony and International Relations : An Essay in Method’. Millennium - Journal of International Studies 12 (2): 162–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298830120020701.
Cox, Robert W. 1986. ‘Social Forces, States and World Order’. In Neorealism and Its Critics, New directions in world politics:204–54. New York: Columbia University Press.
Cutler, Claire. 1999. ‘Locating “Authority” in the Global Political Economy’. International Studies Quarterly 43 (1): 59–81.
Darby, Phillip. 2003. ‘Reconfiguring “The International” Knowledge Machines, Boundaries, and Exclusions’. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 28 (1).
———. 2004. ‘Pursuing the Political: A Postcolonial Rethinking of Relations International’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 33 (1).
De Goede, Marieke. 2008. ‘The Politics of Preemption and the War on Terror in Europe’. European Journal of International Relations 14 (1): 161–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066107087764.
Derian, James der. 1989. ‘“The Boundaries of Knowledge and Power in International Relations”  In:  International/Intertextual Relations: Postmodern Readings of World Politics’. In International/Intertextual Relations: Postmodern Readings of World Politics. Vol. Issues in world politics series. Lexington, Mass: Lexington Books.
Deudney, Daniel, and G. John Ikenberry. 1999. ‘The Nature and Sources of Liberal International Order’. Review Of International Studies 25 (2): 179–96. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097589.
Devetek, Richard. 2005. ‘Critical Theory’. In Theories of International Relations, 3rd Edition, 137–60. Palgrave Macmillan. http://lib.myilibrary.com/Open.aspx?id=85685.
Doty, Roxanne Lynn. 1993. ‘Foreign Policy as Social Construction: A Post-Positivist Analysis of U.S. Counterinsurgency Policy in the Philippines’. International Studies Quarterly 37 (3). https://doi.org/10.2307/2600810.
Dougherty, James E., and Robert L. Pfaltzgraff. 2001. Contending Theories of International Relations: A Comprehensive Survey. 5th ed. New York: Longman.
Doyle, Michael W. 1983. ‘Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs’. Philosophy & Public Affairs 12 (3): 205–35. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2265298.
———. 1986a. ‘Liberalism and World Politics’. American Political Science Review 80 (04): 1151–69. https://doi.org/10.2307/1960861.
———. 1986b. ‘Liberalism and World Politics’. American Political Science Review 80 (04): 1151–69. https://doi.org/10.2307/1960861.
———. 1990. ‘Thucydidean Realism’. Review of International Studies 16 (03). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500112483.
Dunne, Tim. 1995. ‘International Society: Theoretical Promises Fulfilled?’ Cooperation and Conflict 30 (2): 125–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836795030002002.
Dunne, Timothy, Milja Kurki, and Steve Smith, eds. 2016. International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Edkins, Jenny. 1999. Poststructuralism & International Relations: Bringing the Political Back In. Vol. Critical perspectives on world politics. Boulder, Colo: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Edkins, Jenny, and Maja Zehfuss. 2005. ‘Generalising the International’. Review of International Studies 31 (03). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210505006583.
Enloe, Cynthia. 1993a. ‘Are Un Peacekeepers Real Men? And Other Post-Cold War Puzzles’. In The Morning After: Sexual Politics at the End of the Cold War, 10–37. Berkeley: University of California Press.
———. 1993b. ‘Bananas Militarized and Demilitarized’. In The Morning After: Sexual Politics at the End of the Cold War, 102–41. Berkeley: University of California Press.
———. 2004. ‘“Gender” Is Not Enough: The Need for a Feminist Consciousness’. International Affairs 80 (1). http://findit.royalholloway.ac.uk/primo_library/libweb/action/openurl?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft.jtitle=International+Affairs&rft.atitle=%27Gender%27+Is+Not+Enough%3A+The+Need+for+a+Feminist+Consciousness&rft.volume=80&rft.issn=00205850&rft.issue=1&rft.date=2004&rft.aufirst=Cynthia&rft.aulast=Enloe&vid=44ROY_Services_page&institution=44ROY&url_ctx_val=&url_ctx_fmt=null&isSerivcesPage=true.
Enloe, Cynthia H. 2000. Bananas, Beaches and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics. Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press.
Epstein, Charlotte. 2008. The Power of Words in International Relations: Birth of an Anti-Whaling Discourse. Vol. Politics, science, and the environment. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Fanon, Frantz, Richard Philcox, Jean-Paul Sartre, Homi K. Bhabha, and Cornel West. 2021. The Wretched of the Earth. 60th anniversary edition. New York: Grove Press.
Forde, Steven. 1992. ‘Varieties of Realism: Thucydides and Machiavelli’. The Journal of Politics 54 (2): 372–93. https://doi.org/10.2307/2132031.
Foucault, Michel. 1991. ‘What Is An Author?’ In The Foucault Reader, 101–20. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Fukuyama, Francis. 1989. ‘The End of History?’ The National Interest, no. 16: 3–18. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24027184.
Gale, Fred. 1998. ‘Cave ’Cave! Hic Dragones’ : A Neo-Gramscian Deconstruction and Reconstruction of International Regime Theory’. Review of International Political Economy 5 (2): 252–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/096922998347561.
Gamble, Andrew. 1999. ‘Marxism After Communism: Beyond Realism and Historicism’. Review Of International Studies 25 (5): 27–144.
Garst, Daniel. 1989. ‘Thucydides and Neorealism’. International Studies Quarterly 33 (1): 3–27. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600491.
Genest, Marc A. 2004. Conflict and Cooperation: Evolving Theories of International Relations. 2nd ed. Belmont, CA: Thomson/Wadsworth.
Germain, Randall D, and Michael Kenny. 1998. ‘Engaging Gramsci: International Relations Theory and the New Gramscians’. Review Of International Studies 24 (1).
Gill, Stephen. 1993a. Gramsci, Historical Materialism and International Relations. Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
———. 1993b. Gramsci, Historical Materialism and International Relations. Vol. Cambridge Studies in International Relations. Cambridge [England]: Cambridge University Press. http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=13397720900002671&institutionId=2671&customerId=2670.
Gill, Stephen, and David Law. 1988. ‘Marxism and the World System’. In The Global Political Economy: Perspectives, Problems, and Policies, 54–70. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Gill, Stephen R., and David Law. 1989. ‘Global Hegemony and the Structural Power of Capital’. International Studies Quarterly 33 (4): 475–199.
Gills, B. K. 1987. ‘Historical Materialism and International Relations Theory’. Millennium - Journal of International Studies 16 (2): 265–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298870160020301.
Gilpin, Robert. 2002a. ‘The Rise of American Hegemony’. In Britain 1846-1914 and the United States 1941-2001. Ashgate Pub Ltd.
———. 2002b. ‘The Rise of American Hegemony’. In Two Hegemonies: Britain 1846-1914 and the United States 1941-2001, 165–82. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Ltd. https://web.archive.org/web/20130323092826/https://www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel/ipe/gilpin.htm.
Gilpin, Robert G. 1984. ‘The Richness of the Tradition of Political Realism’. International Organization 38 (02). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300026710.
———. 1996. ‘No One Loves a Political Realist’. Security Studies 5 (3): 3–26.
Gilpin, Robert, and Jean M. Gilpin. 1987. The Political Economy of International Relations. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Goldgeier, James M., and Michael McFaul. 1992. ‘A Tale of Two Worlds: Core and Periphery in the Post-Cold War Era’. International Organization 46 (02). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027788.
Grieco, Joseph M. 1993. ‘Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism’. In Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate, New Directions in World Politics:116–42. New York: Columbia University Press.
Grotius, Hugo, and A. C. Campbell. 1814. On the Laws of War and Peace. London. https://web.archive.org/web/20171020013519/http://www.constitution.org/gro/djbp.htm.
Grotius, Hugo, and Stephen C. Neff. 2012. Hugo Grotius on the Law of War and Peace. Student ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Grovogui, Siba N. 2002. ‘Regimes of Sovereignty: International Morality and the African Condition’. European Journal of International Relations 8 (3): 315–38.
Grunberg, Isabelle. 1990. ‘Exploring the "Myth” of Hegemonic Stability’. International Organization 44 (04). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300035372.
Gusterson, Hugh. 2005. ‘Nuclear Weapons and the Other in the Western Imagination’. In People of the Bomb: Portraits of America’s Nuclear Complex, 21–47. Minneapolis, Minn: University of Minnesota Press.
H. Herz, John. 1957. ‘Rise and Demise of The Territorial State’. World Politics 9 (4): 473–93. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2009421?sid=primo&origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.
Halliday, Fred. 1994. ‘A Necessary Encounter: Historical Materialism and International Relations’. In Rethinking International Relations. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Haslam, Jonathan. 2002. No Virtue Like Necessity: Realist Thought in International Relations Since Machiavelli. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Herz, John H. 1942. ‘Power Politics and World Organization’. The American Political Science Review 36 (6). https://doi.org/10.2307/1949064.
Hobbes, Thomas. 1999. ‘The Natural Conditions of Mankind’. In International Relations Theory: Realism, Pluralism, Globalism, and Beyond, 3rd ed, 94–98. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Hobson, J. M. 2005. ‘The Enduring Place of Hierarchy in World Politics: Tracing the Social Logics        of Hierarchy and Political Change’. European Journal of International Relations 11 (1): 63–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066105050137.
Hoffmann, Stanley. 1977. ‘An American Social Science: International Relations’. Daedalus 106 (3): 41–60. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20024493.
———. 1987a. ‘An American Social Science: International Relations’. In Janus and Minerva: Essays in the Theory and Practice of International Politics, 219–21. Boulder: Westview.
———. 1987b. ‘Liberalism and International Affairs’. In Janus and Minerva: Essays in the Theory and Practice of International Politics, 394–417. Boulder.
Hopf, Ted. 1998. ‘The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory’. International Security 23 (1): 171–200. https://doi.org/10.2307/2539267.
Howe, Paul. 1994. ‘The Utopian Realism of E. H. Carr’. Review of International Studies 20 (3): 277–97. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500118078.
Hurrell, Andrew. 2003. ‘Order and Justice in International Relations: What Is at Stake?’ In Order and Justice in International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ikenberry, G. John. 2009a. ‘Liberal Internationalism 3.0: America and the Dilemmas of Liberal World Order’. Perspectives on Politics 7 (1): 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592709090112.
———. 2009b. ‘Liberal Internationalism 3.0: America and the Dilemmas of Liberal World Order’. Perspectives on Politics 7 (01): 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592709090112.
Jackson, Robert, and Georg Sorensen. 2003. Introduction to International Relations: Theories and Approaches. Rev. and Expanded 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
James, Alan. 1989. ‘The Realism of Realism: The State and the Study of International Relations’. Review of International Studies 15 (03). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500112847.
Jervis, Robert. 1999. ‘Realism, Neoliberalism, and Cooperation: Understanding the Debate’. International Security 24 (1): 42–63. https://doi.org/10.1162/016228899560040.
Jones, Adam. 1996. ‘Does “Gender” Make the World Go Round? Feminist Critiques of International Relations’. Review of International Studies 22 (04). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500118649.
Kant, Immanuel. 1970a. ‘An Answer to the Question: ‘What Is Enlightenment?’’. In Kant’s Political Writings. Vol. Cambridge studies in the history and theory of politics. London: Cambridge University Press.
———. 1970b. ‘Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch’. In Kant’s Political Writings. Vol. Cambridge studies in the history and theory of politics. London: Cambridge University Press.
Katzenstein, Peter J. 1996. The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics. Vol. New directions in world politics. New York: Columbia University Press.
Kegley, Charles W., and Shannon Lindsey Blanton. 2011. World Politics: Trend and Transformation. Boston, Mass: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Keohane, Robert O. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Keohane, Robert O. 1986. Neorealism and Its Critics. Vol. New directions in world politics. New York: Columbia University Press.
Keohane, Robert O. 2005. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=5543821.
Keohane, Robert O., and Joseph S. Nye. 1987. ‘Power and Interdependence Revisited’. International Organization 41 (04). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027661.
———. 1989. Power and Interdependence. 2nd ed. [S.l.]: HarperCollins.
Kindleberger, Charles P. 1981. ‘Dominance and Leadership in the International Economy: Exploitation, Public Goods, and Free Rides’. International Studies Quarterly 25 (2). https://doi.org/10.2307/2600355.
Krauthammer, Charles. 1992. ‘The Unipolar Moment’. In Rethinking America’s Security: Beyond Cold War to New World Order, 1st ed, 313–44. New York: Norton.
Krebs, R. R., and P. T. Jackson. 2007. ‘Twisting Tongues and Twisting Arms: The Power of Political Rhetoric’. European Journal of International Relations 13 (1): 35–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066107074284.
Krishna, Sankaran. 2001. ‘Race, Amnesia, and the Education of International Relations’. Alternatives 26 (4).
Lake, David A. 1993. ‘Leadership, Hegemony, and the International Economy: Naked Emperor or Tattered Monarch With Potential?’ International Studies Quarterly 37 (4). http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600841.
Legro, Jeffrey W., and Andrew Moravcsik. 1999. ‘Is Anybody Still a Realist?’ International Security 24 (2): 5–55. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2539248.
Lenin, V. I. 1963. ‘Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism: A Popular Outline’. Moscow: Progress Publishers. 1963. https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1916/imp-hsc/.
———. 1973a. Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism : A Popular Outline. Peking: Foreign Languages Press.
———. 1973b. Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism : A Popular Outline. Peking: Foreign Languages Press.
Ling, Lily H. M. 1996. ‘Hegemony and the Internationalizing State: A Post‐colonial Analysis of China’s Integration Into Asian Corporatism’. Review of International Political Economy 3 (1): 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692299608434343.
Linklater, Andrew. 1986a. ‘Realism, Marxism and Critical International Theory’. Review of International Studies 12 (04). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500113865.
———. 1986b. ‘Realism, Marxism and Critical International Theory’. Review of International Studies 12 (4): 301–12. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500113865.
Linklater, Andrew. 1997. ‘The Transformation of Political Community: E. H. Carr, Critical Theory and International Relations’. Review Of International Studies 23 (3).
Linklater, Andrew. 2004. ‘Dominant and Destructive Masculinities’. International Affairs 80 (1). http://findit.royalholloway.ac.uk/primo_library/libweb/action/openurl?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft.jtitle=International+Affairs&rft.atitle=Dominant+and+Destructive+Masculinities&rft.volume=80&rft.issn=00205850&rft.issue=1&rft.date=2004&rft.aufirst=Andrew&rft.aulast=Linklater&vid=44ROY_Services_page&institution=44ROY&url_ctx_val=&url_ctx_fmt=null&isSerivcesPage=true.
———. 2005. ‘Marxism’. In Theories of International Relations, 3rd Edition, 110–36. Palgrave Macmillan. http://lib.myilibrary.com/Open.aspx?id=85685.
Lynch, Cecelia. 1994. ‘E.H. Carr, International Relations Theory, and the Societal Origins of International Legal Norms’. Millennium - Journal of International Studies 23 (3): 589–619. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298940230030801.
Macchiavell, Niccolo. 1996. ‘Excerpts from “The Prince” in Classics of International Relations’. In Classics of International Relations, 3rd ed, 15–20. Upper Saddle River, N.J: Prentice Hall.
Machiavelli, Nicolo, and W. K. Marriott. 1505. ‘The Prince’. 1505. https://web.archive.org/web/20060101054818/http://www.ilt.columbia.edu/publications/machiavelli.html.
MacLean, John. 1981. ‘Marxist Epistemology, Explanations of “Change” and the Study of International Relations’. In Change and the Study of International Relations: The Evaded Dimension, 46–67. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Maclean, John. 1988. ‘Marxism and International Relations: A Strange Case of Mutual Neglect’. Millennium - Journal of International Studies 17 (2): 295–319. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298880170021201.
Marx, Karl, Friedrich Engels, and Robert C. Tucker. 1978a. ‘Economic and Philosophic Manuscript of 1844’. In The Marx-Engels Reader, 2d ed, 66–125. New York: Norton.
———. 1978b. ‘Wage, Labour and Capital’. In The Marx-Engels Reader, 2d ed, 203–17. New York: Norton.
———. 1978c. ‘Wage, Labour and Capital’. In The Marx-Engels Reader, 2d ed, 203–17. New York: Norton.
Marx, Karl, and Robert C. Tucker. 1978a. ‘Economic and Philosophic Manuscript of 1844’. In The Marx-Engels Reader, 2d ed, 66–125. New York: Norton.
———. 1978b. ‘Theories of Surplus Value’. In The Marx-Engels Reader, 2d ed, 443–68. New York: Norton.
Mastanduno, Michael. 1997. ‘Preserving the Unipolar Moment: Realist Theories and U.S. Grand Strategy After the Cold War’. International Security 21 (4). https://doi.org/10.2307/2539283.
McClintock, Anne. 1992. ‘The Angel of Progress: Pitfalls of the Term “Post-Colonialism”’. Social Text, no. 31/32. https://doi.org/10.2307/466219.
McKeown, Timothy J. 1983. ‘Hegemonic Stability Theory and 19th Century Tariff Levels in Europe’. International Organization 37 (01). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300004203.
Mearsheimer, J. J. 2005. ‘E.H. Carr vs. Idealism: The Battle Rages On’. International Relations 19 (2): 139–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117805052810.
Mearsheimer, John J. 1994. ‘The False Promise of International Institutions’. International Security 19 (3). https://doi.org/10.2307/2539078.
Merrington, John. 1978. ‘Theory and Practice in Gramsci’s Marxism’. In Western Marxism: A Critical Reader, 140–75. London: Verso.
Milliken, Jennifer. 1999. ‘The Study of Discourse in International Relations: A Critique of Research and Methods’. European Journal of International Relations 5 (2).
Milner, Helen. 1992. ‘International Theories of Cooperation Among Nations: Strengths and Weaknesses’. World Politics 44 (03): 466–96. https://doi.org/10.2307/2010546.
Modelski, George. 1978. ‘The Long Cycle of Global Politics and the Nation-State’. Comparative Studies in Society and History 20 (02). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417500008914.
Moravcsik, Andrew. 1997. ‘Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics’. International Organization 52 (1). http://www.jstor.org/stable/2601333.
Morgenthau, Hans. 1948. ‘The Political Science of E. H. Carr’. World Politics 1 (1): 127–34. https://doi.org/10.2307/2009162.
Morgenthau, Hans J. 2006a. ‘A Realist Theory of International Politics’. In Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, 7th ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
———. 2006b. ‘Different Methods of the Balance of Power’. In Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, 7th ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
———. 2006c. ‘The Balance of Power’. In Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, 7th ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
Morgenthau, Hans Joachim. 1974. Scientific Man vs. Power Politics. Vol. Midway reprint. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Morton, Adam David, Bieler, Andreas ;, Andreas Bieler, and Adam David Morton. 2001. ‘The Gordian Knot of Agency-Structure in International Relations: A Neo-Gramscian Perspective’. European Journal of International Relations 7 (1).
Murphy, Craig N. 1998. ‘Understanding IR: Understanding Gramsci’. Review Of International Studies 24 (3).
Neumann, I. B. 2008. ‘The Body of the Diplomat’. European Journal of International Relations 14 (4): 671–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066108097557.
Niebuhr, Reinhold. 2005. Moral Man and Immoral Society: A Study in Ethics and Politics. Vol. Continuum impacts. London: Continuum.
ÓTuathail, Gearóid. 2002. ‘Theorizing Practical Geopolitical Reasoning: The Case of the United States’ Response to the War in Bosnia’. Political Geography 21 (5): 601–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0962-6298(02)00009-4.
Palan, Ronen P., and Brook M. Blair. 1993. ‘On the Idealist Origins of the Realist Theory of International Relations’. Review of International Studies 19 (04). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500118273.
Paul, T. V. 2016. ‘Recasting Statecraft - International Relations and Strategies of Peaceful Change’. Atlanta. http://www.tvpaul.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/ISA_Presidential_Address.pdf.
Powell, Robert. 1994. ‘Anarchy in International Relations Theory: The Neorealist-Neoliberal Debate’. International Organization 48 (02). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300028204.
Price, Richard, and Christian Reus-Smit. 1998. ‘Dangerous Liaisons? Critical International Theory and Constructivism’. European Journal of International Relations 4 (3).
Reus-Smit, Christian. 2005. ‘Constructivism’. In Theories of International Relations, 3rd Edition, 188–212. Palgrave Macmillan. http://lib.myilibrary.com/Open.aspx?id=85685.
Rosecrance, Richard. 1987. ‘Long Cycle Theory and International Relations’. International Organization 41 (2): 283–301. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027478.
Rosenberg, Justin. 1996. ‘Isaac Deutscher and the Lost History of International Relations’. New Left Review, no. 215. https://newleftreview.org/issues/I215/articles/justin-rosenberg-isaac-deutscher-and-the-lost-history-of-international-relations.
Ruggie, John Gerard. 1982. ‘International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order’. International Organization 36 (02). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300018993.
Ruggie, John Gerard. 1998. ‘What Makes the World Hang Together? Neo-Utilitarianism and the Social Constructivist Challenge’. International Organization 52 (4).
Rupert, Mark. 1995. Producing Hegemony: The Politics of Mass Production and American Global Power. Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Said, Edward. 1991. ‘The Scope of Orientalism’. In Orientalism. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Santos, Theotonio Dos. 1970. ‘The Structure of Dependence’. American Economic Review 60 (2): 231–36.
Shaw, Martin. 2002. ‘Post-Imperial and Quasi-Imperial: State and Empire in the Global Era’. Millennium - Journal of International Studies 31 (2): 327–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298020310020701.
Simmons, Beth A., and Daniel J. Hopkins. 2005. ‘The Constraining Power of International Treaties: Theory and Methods’. American Political Science Review 99 (04). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055405051920.
Skjelsbæk, Inger. n.d. ‘Sexual Violence and War: Mapping Out a Complex Relationship’. European Journal of International Relations 7 (2). http://findit.royalholloway.ac.uk/primo_library/libweb/action/openurl?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft.jtitle=European+Journal+of+International+Relations&rft.atitle=Sexual+Violence+and+War%3A+Mapping+Out+a+Complex+Relationship&rft.volume=7&rft.issn=13540661&rft.issue=2&rft.aufirst=Inger&rft.aulast=Skjelsb%C3%A6k&vid=44ROY_Services_page&institution=44ROY&url_ctx_val=&url_ctx_fmt=null&isSerivcesPage=true.
Slater, David. 1998. ‘Post-Colonial Questions for Global Times’. Review of International Political Economy 5 (4): 647–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/096922998347417.
Slaughter, Anne-Marie. 2004. A New World Order. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Smith, Michael Joseph. 1986. Realist Thought From Weber to Kissinger. London.
Snidal, Duncan. 1985. ‘The Limits of Hegemonic Stability Theory’. International Organization 39 (04). https://doi.org/10.1017/S002081830002703X.
Sterling-Folker, Jennifer. 2000. ‘Competing Paradigms or Birds of a Feather? Constructivism and Neoliberal Institutionalism Compared’. International Studies Quarterly 44 (1): 97–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/0020-8833.00150.
Stern, Maria, and Marysia Zalewski. 2009. ‘Feminist Fatigue(s): Reflections on Feminism and Familiar Fables of Militarisation’. Review of International Studies 35 (03). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210509008675.
Thucydides. 1954. ‘The Melian Dialogue’. In History of the Peloponnesian War, Penguin classics:400–408. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
———. 1996. ‘The Melian Dialogue’. In Classics of International Relations, 3rd Edition, 84–90. Upper Saddle River, N.J: Prentice Hall.
Thucydides, and Richard Crawley. n.d. ‘History of the Peloponnesian War’. http://people.ucalgary.ca/~vandersp/Courses/texts/thucydi1.html.
Tickner, J. Ann. 1988. ‘Hans Morgenthau’s Principles of Political Realism: A Feminist Reformulation’. Millennium - Journal of International Studies 17 (3): 429–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298880170030801.
———. 1997. ‘You Just Don’t Understand: Troubled Engagements Between Feminists and IR Theorists’. International Studies Quarterly 41 (4): 611–32. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600855?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.
True, Jacqui. 2005. ‘Feminism’. In Theories of International Relations, 3rd Edition, 213–34. Palgrave Macmillan. http://lib.myilibrary.com/Open.aspx?id=85685.
Vasquez, John A. 1998. The Power of Power Politics: From Classical Realism to Neotraditionalism. Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vincent, R.J. 1988. ‘Hedley Bull and Order in International Politics’. Millennium - Journal of International Studies 17 (2): 195–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298880170020701.
Viotti, Paul R., and Mark V. Kauppi. 1999. ‘Realism: The State, Power and the Balance of Power’. In International Relations Theory: Realism, Pluralism, Globalism, and Beyond, 3rd ed, 35–67. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1974a. The Modern World-System Vol. 1: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century. Vol. Studies in Social Discontinuity. New York: Academic.
———. 1974b. ‘The Rise and Future Demise of the World Capitalist System: Concepts for Comparative Analysis’. Comparative Studies in Society and History 16 (4): 387–415. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417500007520.
———. 1983. ‘The Three Instances of Hegemony in the History of the Capitalist World-Economy’. Comparative Sociology 24 (1): 100–108. https://doi.org/10.1163/156854283X00071.
Waltz, Kenneth N. 1979. Theory of International Politics. London: McGraw-Hill.
Waltz, Kenneth N. 2001. Man, the State, and War: A Theoretical Analysis. New ed. New York: Columbia University Press.
Wendt, Alexander. 1992. ‘Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics’. International Organization 46 (2): 391–425. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027764.
Wilson, Peter. 1998. ‘The Myth of the “First Great Debate”’. Review of International Studies 24 (4): 1–15. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097558.
Wilson, Woodrow. 2014. ‘The World Must Be Made Safe for Democracy: The Fourteen Points’. In Essential Readings in World Politics, edited by Karen A. Mingst and Jack L. Snyder (eds.), Fifth Edition, The Norton series in world politics:4–6. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
Wolfers, Arnold. 1962. Discord and Collaboration: Essays on International Politics. London: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Youngs, Gillian. 2004. ‘Feminist International Relations: A Contradiction in Terms? Or: Why Women and Gender Are Essential to Understanding the World “We” Live In*’. International Affairs 80 (1): 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2004.00367.x.
Zacher, Mark W., and Richard A. Matthew. 1995. ‘Liberal International Theory: Common Threads, Divergent Strands’. In Controversies in International Relations Theory: Realism and the Neo-Liberal Challenge, 107–50. Basingstoke: Macmillan.