1.
Carr, E. H. & Cox, M. The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 1919-1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations. (Palgrave, 2001).
2.
Mearsheimer, J. J. E.H. Carr vs. Idealism: The Battle Rages On. International Relations 19, 139–152 (2005).
3.
Paul, T. V. Recasting Statecraft - International Relations and Strategies of Peaceful Change. vol. Presidential Address International Studies Association (ISA), 57th Annual Convention (2016).
4.
Howe, P. The Utopian Realism of E. H. Carr. Review of International Studies 20, 277–297 (1994).
5.
Morgenthau, H. The Political Science of E. H. Carr. World Politics 1, 127–134 (1948).
6.
Wilson, P. The Myth of the ‘First Great Debate’. Review of International Studies 24, 1–15 (1998).
7.
Ikenberry, G. J. Liberal Internationalism 3.0: America and the Dilemmas of Liberal World Order. Perspectives on Politics 7, 71–87 (2009).
8.
Keohane, R. O. & Nye, J. S. Power and Interdependence. (HarperCollins, 1989).
9.
Keohane, R. O. & Nye, J. S. Power and Interdependence Revisited. International Organization 41, (1987).
10.
Doyle, M. W. Liberalism and World Politics. American Political Science Review 80, 1151–1169 (1986).
11.
Deudney, D. & Ikenberry, G. J. The Nature and Sources of Liberal International Order. Review Of International Studies 25, 179–196 (1999).
12.
Doyle, M. W. Liberalism and World Politics. American Political Science Review 80, 1151–1169 (1986).
13.
Fukuyama, F. The End of History? The National Interest 3–18 (1989).
14.
Ikenberry, G. J. Liberal Internationalism 3.0: America and the Dilemmas of Liberal World Order. Perspectives on Politics 7, 71–87 (2009).
15.
Slaughter, A.-M. A New World Order. (Princeton University Press, 2004).
16.
Moravcsik, A. Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics. International Organization 52, (1997).
17.
Zacher, M. W. & Matthew, R. A. Liberal International Theory: Common Threads, Divergent Strands. in Controversies in International Relations Theory: Realism and the Neo-Liberal Challenge 107–150 (Macmillan, 1995).
18.
Wilson, W. The World Must be Made Safe for Democracy: The Fourteen Points. in Essential Readings in World Politics (eds. Mingst, K. A. & Snyder (eds.), J. L.) vol. The Norton series in world politics 4–6 (W.W. Norton & Company, 2014).
19.
Kant, I. An Answer to the Question: ‘What is Enlightenment?’. in Kant’s Political Writings vol. Cambridge studies in the history and theory of politics (Cambridge University Press, 1970).
20.
Kant, I. Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch. in Kant’s Political Writings vol. Cambridge studies in the history and theory of politics (Cambridge University Press, 1970).
21.
Grieco, J. M. Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism. in Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate vol. New Directions in World Politics 116–142 (Columbia University Press, 1993).
22.
Baldwin, D. A. Neoliberalism, Neorealism, and World Politics. in Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate vol. New Directions in World Politics 3–28 (Columbia University Press, 1993).
23.
Hoffmann, S. Liberalism and International Affairs. in Janus and Minerva: Essays in the Theory and Practice of International Politics 394–417 (1987).
24.
Doyle, M. W. Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs. Philosophy & Public Affairs 12, 205–235 (1983).
25.
Genest, M. A. Conflict and Cooperation: Evolving Theories of International Relations. (Thomson/Wadsworth, 2004).
26.
Kegley, C. W. & Blanton, S. L. World Politics: Trend and Transformation. (Wadsworth Cengage Learning, 2011).
27.
Jackson, R. & Sorensen, G. Introduction to International Relations: Theories and Approaches. (Oxford University Press, 2003).
28.
Morgenthau, H. J. A Realist Theory of International Politics. in Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace (McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 2006).
29.
Morgenthau, H. J. The Balance of Power. in Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace (McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 2006).
30.
Morgenthau, H. J. Different Methods of the Balance of Power. in Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace (McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 2006).
31.
Forde, S. Varieties of Realism: Thucydides and Machiavelli. The Journal of Politics 54, 372–393 (1992).
32.
Waltz, K. N. Man, the State, and War: A Theoretical Analysis. (Columbia University Press, 2001).
33.
Morgenthau, H. J. Scientific Man vs. Power Politics. vol. Midway reprint (University of Chicago Press, 1974).
34.
Niebuhr, R. Moral Man and Immoral Society: A Study in Ethics and Politics. vol. Continuum impacts (Continuum, 2005).
35.
Claude, I. L. Power and International Relations. (Random House, 2012).
36.
Aron, R. Peace and War: A Theory of International Relations. (Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1966).
37.
Palan, R. P. & Blair, B. M. On the Idealist Origins of the Realist Theory of International Relations. Review of International Studies 19, (1993).
38.
Viotti, P. R. & Kauppi, M. V. Realism: The State, Power and the Balance of Power. in International Relations Theory: Realism, Pluralism, Globalism, and Beyond 35–67 (Allyn and Bacon, 1999).
39.
Carr, E. H. The Nature of Politics. in International Relations Theory: Realism, Pluralism, Globalism, and Beyond 562–566 (Allyn and Bacon, 1999).
40.
Dougherty, J. E. & Pfaltzgraff, R. L. Contending Theories of International Relations: A Comprehensive Survey. (Longman, 2001).
41.
Vasquez, J. A. The Power of Power Politics: From Classical Realism to Neotraditionalism. vol. Cambridge studies in international relations (Cambridge University Press, 1998).
42.
Haslam, J. No Virtue Like Necessity: Realist Thought in International Relations Since Machiavelli. (Yale University Press, 2002).
43.
Smith, M. J. Realist Thought From Weber to Kissinger. (London, 1986).
44.
Doyle, M. W. Thucydidean Realism. Review of International Studies 16, (1990).
45.
Garst, D. Thucydides and Neorealism. International Studies Quarterly 33, 3–27 (1989).
46.
Bagby, L. M. J. The Use and Abuse of Thucydides in International Relations. International Organization 48, (1994).
47.
Thucydides. The Melian Dialogue. in History of the Peloponnesian war vol. Penguin classics 400–408 (Penguin, 1954).
48.
Thucydides. The Melian Dialogue. in Classics of International Relations 84–90 (Prentice Hall, 1996).
49.
Thucydides & Crawley, R. History of the Peloponnesian War. http://people.ucalgary.ca/~vandersp/Courses/texts/thucydi1.html.
50.
Macchiavell, N. Excerpts from ‘The Prince’ in Classics of International Relations. in Classics of International Relations 15–20 (Prentice Hall, 1996).
51.
Machiavelli, N. & Marriott, W. K. The Prince. https://web.archive.org/web/20060101054818/http://www.ilt.columbia.edu/publications/machiavelli.html (1505).
52.
Hobbes, T. The Natural Conditions of Mankind. in International Relations Theory: Realism, Pluralism, Globalism, and Beyond 94–98 (Allyn and Bacon, 1999).
53.
Gilpin, R. G. The Richness of the Tradition of Political Realism. International Organization 38, (1984).
54.
Gilpin, R. G. No One Loves a Political Realist. Security Studies 5, 3–26 (1996).
55.
Herz, J. H. Power Politics and World Organization. The American Political Science Review 36, (1942).
56.
H. Herz, J. Rise and Demise of The Territorial State. World Politics 9, 473–493 (1957).
57.
Hoffmann, S. An American Social Science: International Relations. Daedalus 106, 41–60 (1977).
58.
Hoffmann, S. An American Social Science: International Relations. in Janus and Minerva: Essays in the Theory and Practice of International Politics 219–221 (Westview, 1987).
59.
James, A. The Realism of Realism: The State and the Study of International Relations. Review of International Studies 15, (1989).
60.
Wolfers, A. Discord and Collaboration: Essays on International Politics. (Johns Hopkins University Press, 1962).
61.
Waltz, K. N. Theory of International Politics. (McGraw-Hill, 1979).
62.
Keohane, R. O. Neorealism and Its Critics. vol. New directions in world politics (Columbia University Press, 1986).
63.
Rosecrance, R. Long Cycle Theory and International Relations. International Organization 41, 283–301 (1987).
64.
International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. (Oxford University Press, 2016).
65.
Powell, R. Anarchy in International Relations Theory: The Neorealist-Neoliberal Debate. International Organization 48, (1994).
66.
Modelski, G. The Long Cycle of Global Politics and the Nation-State. Comparative Studies in Society and History 20, (1978).
67.
Krauthammer, C. The Unipolar Moment. in Rethinking America’s Security: Beyond Cold War to New World Order 313–344 (Norton, 1992).
68.
Mastanduno, M. Preserving the Unipolar Moment: Realist Theories and U.S. Grand Strategy After the Cold War. International Security 21, (1997).
69.
Keohane, R. O. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. (Princeton University Press, 2005).
70.
Keohane, R. O. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. (Princeton University Press, 1984).
71.
Mearsheimer, J. J. The False Promise of International Institutions. International Security 19, (1994).
72.
Legro, J. W. & Moravcsik, A. Is Anybody Still a Realist? International Security 24, 5–55 (1999).
73.
Jervis, R. Realism, Neoliberalism, and Cooperation: Understanding the Debate. International Security 24, 42–63 (1999).
74.
Gilpin, R. The Rise of American Hegemony. in Britain 1846-1914 and the United States 1941-2001 (Ashgate Pub Ltd, 2002).
75.
Gilpin, R. The Rise of American Hegemony. in Two Hegemonies: Britain 1846-1914 and the United States 1941-2001 165–182 (Ashgate Publishing Ltd., 2002).
76.
Grunberg, I. Exploring the "Myth” of Hegemonic Stability. International Organization 44, (1990).
77.
Ruggie, J. G. International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order. International Organization 36, (1982).
78.
Milner, H. International Theories of Cooperation Among Nations: Strengths and Weaknesses. World Politics 44, 466–496 (1992).
79.
Simmons, B. A. & Hopkins, D. J. The Constraining Power of International Treaties: Theory and Methods. American Political Science Review 99, (2005).
80.
Kindleberger, C. P. Dominance and Leadership in the International Economy: Exploitation, Public Goods, and Free Rides. International Studies Quarterly 25, (1981).
81.
Snidal, D. The Limits of Hegemonic Stability Theory. International Organization 39, (1985).
82.
Lake, D. A. Leadership, Hegemony, and the International Economy: Naked Emperor or Tattered Monarch With Potential? International Studies Quarterly 37, (1993).
83.
McKeown, T. J. Hegemonic Stability Theory and 19th Century Tariff Levels in Europe. International Organization 37, (1983).
84.
Bull, H. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. (Palgrave Macmillan, 2012).
85.
Edkins, J. & Zehfuss, M. Generalising the International. Review of International Studies 31, (2005).
86.
Dunne, T. International Society: Theoretical Promises Fulfilled? Cooperation and Conflict 30, 125–154 (1995).
87.
Bellamy, A. J. International Society and Its Critics. (Oxford University Press, 2005).
88.
Bellamy, A. J. International Society and Its Critics. (Oxford University Press, 2004).
89.
Bull, H. Order vs. Justice in International Society. Political Studies 19, 269–283 (1971).
90.
Hurrell, A. Order and Justice in International Relations: What is at Stake? in Order and Justice in International Relations (Oxford University Press, 2003).
91.
Bellamy, A. J. International Society and Its Critics. (Oxford University Press, 2005).
92.
Bellamy, A. J. International Society and Its Critics. (Oxford University Press, 2004).
93.
Brown, C. International Theory and International Society: The Viability of the Middle Way? Review of International Studies 21, (1995).
94.
Brown, C. International Theory and International Society: The Viability of the Middle Way? Review of International Studies 21, (1995).
95.
Linklater, A. The Transformation of Political Community: E. H. Carr, Critical Theory and International Relations. Review Of International Studies 23, (1997).
96.
Lynch, C. E.H. Carr, International Relations Theory, and the Societal Origins of International Legal Norms. Millennium - Journal of International Studies 23, 589–619 (1994).
97.
Vincent, R. J. Hedley Bull and Order in International Politics. Millennium - Journal of International Studies 17, 195–213 (1988).
98.
Buzan, B. From International to World Society?: English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation. vol. Cambridge studies in international relations (Cambridge University Press, 2004).
99.
Buzan, B. From International to World Society?: English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation. (Cambridge University Press, 2004).
100.
Grotius, H. & Neff, S. C. Hugo Grotius on the Law of War and Peace. (Cambridge University Press, 2012).
101.
Grotius, H. & Campbell, A. C. On the Laws of War and Peace. (1814).
102.
Bull, H. The Importance of Grotius in the Study of International Relations. in Hugo Grotius and International Relations 65–94 (Clarendon, 1990).
103.
Linklater, A. Marxism. in Theories of International Relations 110–136 (Palgrave Macmillan, 2005).
104.
Gilpin, R. & Gilpin, J. M. The Political Economy of International Relations. (Princeton University Press, 1987).
105.
Gills, B. K. Historical Materialism and International Relations Theory. Millennium - Journal of International Studies 16, 265–270 (1987).
106.
Marx, K., Engels, F. & Tucker, R. C. Economic and Philosophic Manuscript of 1844. in The Marx-Engels Reader 66–125 (Norton, 1978).
107.
Marx, K., Engels, F. & Tucker, R. C. Wage, Labour and Capital. in The Marx-Engels Reader 203–217 (Norton, 1978).
108.
Linklater, A. Realism, Marxism and Critical International Theory. Review of International Studies 12, (1986).
109.
Maclean, J. Marxism and International Relations: A Strange Case of Mutual Neglect. Millennium - Journal of International Studies 17, 295–319 (1988).
110.
Burnham, P. Open Marxism and Vulgar International Political Economy. Review of International Political Economy 1, 221–231 (1994).
111.
Marx, K. & Tucker, R. C. Economic and Philosophic Manuscript of 1844. in The Marx-Engels Reader 66–125 (Norton, 1978).
112.
Marx, K., Engels, F. & Tucker, R. C. Wage, Labour and Capital. in The Marx-Engels Reader 203–217 (Norton, 1978).
113.
Marx, K. & Tucker, R. C. Theories of Surplus Value. in The Marx-Engels Reader 443–468 (Norton, 1978).
114.
Lenin, V. I. Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism : A Popular Outline. (Foreign Languages Press, 1973).
115.
Rosenberg, J. Isaac Deutscher and the Lost History of International Relations. New Left Review (1996).
116.
Berki, R. N. On Marxian Thought and the Problem of International Relations. World Politics 24, 80–105 (1971).
117.
Burnham, P. The Communist Manifesto as International Relations Theory. in The Communist Manifesto: New Interpretations (Edinburgh University Press, 1998).
118.
Halliday, F. A Necessary Encounter: Historical Materialism and International Relations. in Rethinking International Relations (Macmillan, 1994).
119.
Gamble, A. Marxism After Communism: Beyond Realism and Historicism. Review Of International Studies 25, 27–144 (1999).
120.
Cutler, C. Locating ‘Authority’ in the Global Political Economy. International Studies Quarterly 43, 59–81 (1999).
121.
MacLean, J. Marxist Epistemology, Explanations of ‘Change’ and the Study of International Relations. in Change and the Study of International Relations: The Evaded Dimension 46–67 (St. Martin’s Press, 1981).
122.
Linklater, A. Realism, Marxism and Critical International Theory. Review of International Studies 12, 301–312 (1986).
123.
Wallerstein, I. The Rise and Future Demise of the World Capitalist System: Concepts for Comparative Analysis. Comparative Studies in Society and History 16, 387–415 (1974).
124.
Gill, S. & Law, D. Marxism and the World System. in The Global Political Economy: Perspectives, Problems, and Policies 54–70 (Johns Hopkins University Press, 1988).
125.
Gill, S. R. & Law, D. Global Hegemony and the Structural Power of Capital. International Studies Quarterly 33, 475–199 (1989).
126.
Cox, R. W. Social Forces, States and World Order. in Neorealism and Its Critics vol. New directions in world politics 204–254 (Columbia University Press, 1986).
127.
Lenin, V. I. Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism : A Popular Outline. (Foreign Languages Press, 1973).
128.
Lenin, V. I. Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism: A Popular Outline. https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1916/imp-hsc/ (1963).
129.
Wallerstein, I. The Modern World-System Vol. 1: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century. vol. Studies in Social Discontinuity (Academic, 1974).
130.
Wallerstein, I. The Three Instances of Hegemony in the History of the Capitalist World-Economy. Comparative Sociology 24, 100–108 (1983).
131.
Chase-Dunn, C. Interstate System and Capitalist World-Economy: One Logic or Two? International Studies Quarterly 25, 19–42 (1981).
132.
Santos, T. D. The Structure of Dependence. American Economic Review 60, 231–236 (1970).
133.
Merrington, J. Theory and Practice in Gramsci’s Marxism. in Western Marxism: A Critical Reader 140–175 (Verso, 1978).
134.
Cox, Robert. W. Gramsci, Hegemony and International Relations : An Essay in Method. Millennium - Journal of International Studies 12, 162–175 (1983).
135.
Germain, R. D. & Kenny, M. Engaging Gramsci: International Relations Theory and the New Gramscians. Review Of International Studies 24, (1998).
136.
Murphy, C. N. Understanding IR: Understanding Gramsci. Review Of International Studies 24, (1998).
137.
Gale, F. Cave ’Cave! Hic Dragones’ : A Neo-Gramscian Deconstruction and Reconstruction of International Regime Theory. Review of International Political Economy 5, 252–283 (1998).
138.
Gill, S. Gramsci, Historical Materialism and International Relations. vol. Cambridge studies in international relations (Cambridge University Press, 1993).
139.
Gill, S. Gramsci, Historical Materialism and International Relations. vol. Cambridge Studies in International Relations (Cambridge University Press, 1993).
140.
Rupert, M. Producing Hegemony: The Politics of Mass Production and American Global Power. vol. Cambridge studies in international relations (Cambridge University Press, 1995).
141.
Morton, Adam David, B., Andreas ;, Bieler, A. & Morton, A. D. The Gordian Knot of Agency-Structure in International Relations: A Neo-Gramscian Perspective. European Journal of International Relations 7, (2001).
142.
Reus-Smit, C. Constructivism. in Theories of International Relations 188–212 (Palgrave Macmillan, 2005).
143.
Wendt, A. Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics. International Organization 46, 391–425 (1992).
144.
Hopf, T. The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory. International Security 23, 171–200 (1998).
145.
Katzenstein, P. J. The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics. vol. New directions in world politics (Columbia University Press, 1996).
146.
Sterling-Folker, J. Competing Paradigms or Birds of a Feather? Constructivism and Neoliberal Institutionalism Compared. International Studies Quarterly 44, 97–119 (2000).
147.
Krebs, R. R. & Jackson, P. T. Twisting Tongues and Twisting Arms: The Power of Political Rhetoric. European Journal of International Relations 13, 35–66 (2007).
148.
Hobson, J. M. The Enduring Place of Hierarchy in World Politics: Tracing the Social Logics of Hierarchy and Political Change. European Journal of International Relations 11, 63–98 (2005).
149.
Ruggie, J. G. What Makes the World Hang Together? Neo-Utilitarianism and the Social Constructivist Challenge. International Organization 52, (1998).
150.
Adler, E. The Spread of Security Communities: Communities of Practice, Self-Restraint, and NATO’s Post--Cold War Transformation. European Journal of International Relations 14, 195–230 (2008).
151.
Autesserre, S. Hobbes and the Congo: Frames, Local Violence, and International Intervention. International Organization 63, (2009).
152.
Price, R. & Reus-Smit, C. Dangerous Liaisons? Critical International Theory and Constructivism. European Journal of International Relations 4, (1998).
153.
Devetek, R. Critical Theory. in Theories of International Relations 137–160 (Palgrave Macmillan, 2005).
154.
Edkins, J. Poststructuralism & International Relations: Bringing the Political Back In. vol. Critical perspectives on world politics (Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1999).
155.
Foucault, M. What Is An Author? in The Foucault Reader 101–120 (Penguin, 1991).
156.
Epstein, C. The Power of Words in International Relations: Birth of an Anti-Whaling Discourse. vol. Politics, science, and the environment (MIT Press, 2008).
157.
Grovogui, S. N. Regimes of Sovereignty: International Morality and the African Condition. European Journal of International Relations 8, 315–338 (2002).
158.
Said, E. The Scope of Orientalism. in Orientalism (Penguin, 1991).
159.
Gusterson, H. Nuclear Weapons and the Other in the Western Imagination. in People of the Bomb: Portraits of America’s Nuclear Complex 21–47 (University of Minnesota Press, 2005).
160.
Milliken, Jennifer. The Study of Discourse in International Relations: A Critique of Research and Methods. European Journal of International Relations 5, (1999).
161.
ÓTuathail, G. Theorizing Practical Geopolitical Reasoning: The Case of the United States’ Response to the War in Bosnia. Political Geography 21, 601–628 (2002).
162.
Campbell, D. Political Prosaics, Transversal Politics and the Anarchical World. in Challenging Boundaries: Global Flows, Territorial Identities vol. Borderlines (University of Minnesota Press, 1996).
163.
Doty, R. L. Foreign Policy as Social Construction: A Post-Positivist Analysis of U.S. Counterinsurgency Policy in the Philippines. International Studies Quarterly 37, (1993).
164.
Ashley, R. K. The Poverty of Neorealism. International Organization 38, (1984).
165.
Campbell, D. Politics Without Principle: Sovereignty, Ethics, and the Narratives of the Gulf War. vol. Critical perspectives on world politics (Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1993).
166.
der Derian, J. ‘The Boundaries of Knowledge and Power in International Relations’ In: International/Intertextual Relations: Postmodern Readings of World Politics. in International/Intertextual Relations: Postmodern Readings of World Politics vol. Issues in world politics series (Lexington Books, 1989).
167.
Neumann, I. B. The Body of the Diplomat. European Journal of International Relations 14, 671–695 (2008).
168.
De Goede, M. The Politics of Preemption and the War on Terror in Europe. European Journal of International Relations 14, 161–185 (2008).
169.
Darby, P. Pursuing the Political: A Postcolonial Rethinking of Relations International. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 33, (2004).
170.
Krishna, S. Race, Amnesia, and the Education of International Relations. Alternatives 26, (2001).
171.
Fanon, F., Philcox, R., Sartre, J.-P., Bhabha, H. K. & West, C. The Wretched of the Earth. (Grove Press, 2021).
172.
Darby, P. Reconfiguring ‘The International’ Knowledge Machines, Boundaries, and Exclusions. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 28, (2003).
173.
Barkawi, T. & Laffey, M. Retrieving the Imperial: Empire and International Relations. Millennium - Journal of International Studies 31, 109–127 (2002).
174.
Callinicos, A. The Actuality of Imperialism. Millennium - Journal of International Studies 31, 319–326 (2002).
175.
Shaw, M. Post-Imperial and Quasi-Imperial: State and Empire in the Global Era. Millennium - Journal of International Studies 31, 327–336 (2002).
176.
Slater, D. Post-Colonial Questions for Global Times. Review of International Political Economy 5, 647–678 (1998).
177.
Ling, L. H. M. Hegemony and the Internationalizing State: A Post‐colonial Analysis of China’s Integration Into Asian Corporatism. Review of International Political Economy 3, 1–26 (1996).
178.
McClintock, A. The Angel of Progress: Pitfalls of the Term ‘Post-Colonialism’. Social Text (1992) doi:10.2307/466219.
179.
Goldgeier, J. M. & McFaul, M. A Tale of Two Worlds: Core and Periphery in the Post-Cold War Era. International Organization 46, (1992).
180.
Aydinli, E. & Mathews, J. Periphery Theorising for a Truly Internationalised Discipline: Spinning IR Theory Out of Anatolia. Review of International Studies 34, (2008).
181.
True, J. Feminism. in Theories of International Relations 213–234 (Palgrave Macmillan, 2005).
182.
Tickner, J. A. You Just Don’t Understand: Troubled Engagements Between Feminists and IR Theorists. International Studies Quarterly 41, 611–632 (1997).
183.
Enloe, C. Are Un Peacekeepers Real Men? and Other Post-Cold War Puzzles. in The Morning After: Sexual Politics at the End of the Cold War 10–37 (University of California Press, 1993).
184.
Enloe, C. Bananas Militarized and Demilitarized. in The Morning After: Sexual Politics at the End of the Cold War 102–141 (University of California Press, 1993).
185.
Stern, M. & Zalewski, M. Feminist Fatigue(s): Reflections on Feminism and Familiar Fables of Militarisation. Review of International Studies 35, (2009).
186.
Skjelsbæk, I. Sexual Violence and War: Mapping Out a Complex Relationship. European Journal of International Relations 7,.
187.
Enloe, C. H. Bananas, Beaches and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics. (University of California Press, 2000).
188.
Jones, A. Does ‘Gender’ Make the World Go Round? Feminist Critiques of International Relations. Review of International Studies 22, (1996).
189.
Carver, T., Cochran, M. & Squires, J. Gendering Jones: Feminisms, IRs, Masculinities. Review Of International Studies 24, (1998).
190.
Tickner, J. A. Hans Morgenthau’s Principles of Political Realism: A Feminist Reformulation. Millennium - Journal of International Studies 17, 429–440 (1988).
191.
Brown, W. Finding the Man in the State. Feminist Studies 18, (1992).
192.
Youngs, G. Feminist International Relations: A Contradiction in Terms? Or: Why Women and Gender Are Essential to Understanding the World ‘We’ Live In*. International Affairs 80, 75–87 (2004).
193.
Linklater, A. Dominant and Destructive Masculinities. International Affairs 80, (2004).
194.
Carver, T. War of the Worlds/Invasion of the Body Snatchers. International Affairs (Royal Institute Of International Affairs 1944-) 80, (2004).
195.
Enloe, C. ‘Gender’ Is Not Enough: The Need for a Feminist Consciousness. International Affairs 80, (2004).
