Adler, E. (2008). The Spread of Security Communities: Communities of Practice, Self-Restraint, and NATO’s Post--Cold War Transformation. European Journal of International Relations, 14(2), 195–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066108089241
Aron, R. (1966). Peace and War: A Theory of International Relations. Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
Ashley, R. K. (1984). The Poverty of Neorealism. International Organization, 38(02). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300026709
Autesserre, S. (2009). Hobbes and the Congo: Frames, Local Violence, and International Intervention. International Organization, 63(02). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818309090080
Aydinli, E., & Mathews, J. (2008). Periphery Theorising for a Truly Internationalised Discipline: Spinning IR Theory Out of Anatolia. Review of International Studies, 34(04). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210508008231
Bagby, L. M. J. (1994). The Use and Abuse of Thucydides in International Relations. International Organization, 48(01). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300000849
Baldwin, D. A. (1993). Neoliberalism, Neorealism, and World Politics. In Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate: Vol. New Directions in World Politics (pp. 3–28). Columbia University Press.
Barkawi, T., & Laffey, M. (2002). Retrieving the Imperial: Empire and International Relations. Millennium - Journal of International Studies, 31(1), 109–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298020310010601
Bellamy, A. J. (2004a). International Society and Its Critics. Oxford University Press. http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=13397721050002671&institutionId=2671&customerId=2670
Bellamy, A. J. (2004b). International Society and Its Critics. Oxford University Press. http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=13397655180002671&institutionId=2671&customerId=2670
Bellamy, A. J. (2005a). International Society and Its Critics. Oxford University Press. http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=13397529850002671&institutionId=2671&customerId=2670
Bellamy, A. J. (2005b). International Society and Its Critics. Oxford University Press. http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=13397720990002671&institutionId=2671&customerId=2670
Berki, R. N. (1971). On Marxian Thought and the Problem of International Relations. World Politics, 24(01), 80–105. https://doi.org/10.2307/2009707
Brown, C. (1995a). International Theory and International Society: The Viability of the Middle Way? Review of International Studies, 21(02). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500117619
Brown, C. (1995b). International Theory and International Society: The Viability of the Middle Way? Review of International Studies, 21(02). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500117619
Brown, W. (1992). Finding the Man in the State. Feminist Studies, 18(1). https://www.jstor.org/stable/3178212
Bull, H. (1971). Order vs. Justice in International Society. Political Studies, 19(3), 269–283. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1971.tb00674.x
Bull, H. (1990). The Importance of Grotius in the Study of International Relations. In Hugo Grotius and International Relations (pp. 65–94). Clarendon. http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=13407032680002671&institutionId=2671&customerId=2670
Bull, H. (2012). The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics (4th ed). Palgrave Macmillan.
Burnham, P. (1994). Open Marxism and Vulgar International Political Economy. Review of International Political Economy, 1(2), 221–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692299408434277
Burnham, P. (1998). The Communist Manifesto as International Relations Theory. In The Communist Manifesto: New Interpretations. Edinburgh University Press.
Buzan, B. (2004a). From International to World Society?: English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation. Cambridge University Press. http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=13397655140002671&institutionId=2671&customerId=2670
Buzan, B. (2004b). From International to World Society?: English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation: Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press. http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=13397655150002671&institutionId=2671&customerId=2670
Callinicos, A. (2002). The Actuality of Imperialism. Millennium - Journal of International Studies, 31(2), 319–326. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298020310020601
Campbell, D. (1993). Politics Without Principle: Sovereignty, Ethics, and the Narratives of the Gulf War: Vol. Critical perspectives on world politics. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Campbell, D. (1996). Political Prosaics, Transversal Politics and the Anarchical World. In Challenging Boundaries: Global Flows, Territorial Identities: Vol. Borderlines. University of Minnesota Press.
Carr, E. H. (1999). The Nature of Politics. In International Relations Theory: Realism, Pluralism, Globalism, and Beyond (3rd ed, pp. 562–566). Allyn and Bacon.
Carr, E. H., & Cox, M. (2001). The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 1919-1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations (2nd ed). Palgrave.
Carver, T. (2004). War of the Worlds/Invasion of the Body Snatchers. International Affairs (Royal Institute Of International Affairs 1944-), 80(1).
Carver, T., Cochran, M., & Squires, J. (1998). Gendering Jones: Feminisms, IRs, Masculinities. Review Of International Studies, 24(2). http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097523
Chase-Dunn, C. (1981). Interstate System and Capitalist World-Economy: One Logic or Two? International Studies Quarterly, 25(1), 19–42. https://doi.org/10.2307/2600209
Claude, I. L. (2012). Power and International Relations. Random House.
Cox, R. W. (1986). Social Forces, States and World Order. In Neorealism and Its Critics: Vol. New directions in world politics (pp. 204–254). Columbia University Press.
Cox, Robert. W. (1983). Gramsci, Hegemony and International Relations : An Essay in Method. Millennium - Journal of International Studies, 12(2), 162–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298830120020701
Cutler, C. (1999). Locating ‘Authority’ in the Global Political Economy. International Studies Quarterly, 43(1), 59–81.
Darby, P. (2003). Reconfiguring ‘The International’ Knowledge Machines, Boundaries, and Exclusions. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 28(1).
Darby, P. (2004). Pursuing the Political: A Postcolonial Rethinking of Relations International. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 33(1).
De Goede, M. (2008). The Politics of Preemption and the War on Terror in Europe. European Journal of International Relations, 14(1), 161–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066107087764
der Derian, J. (1989). ‘The Boundaries of Knowledge and Power in International Relations’ In: International/Intertextual Relations: Postmodern Readings of World Politics. In International/Intertextual Relations: Postmodern Readings of World Politics: Vol. Issues in world politics series. Lexington Books.
Deudney, D., & Ikenberry, G. J. (1999). The Nature and Sources of Liberal International Order. Review Of International Studies, 25(2), 179–196. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097589
Devetek, R. (2005). Critical Theory. In Theories of International Relations (3rd Edition, pp. 137–160). Palgrave Macmillan. http://lib.myilibrary.com/Open.aspx?id=85685
Doty, R. L. (1993). Foreign Policy as Social Construction: A Post-Positivist Analysis of U.S. Counterinsurgency Policy in the Philippines. International Studies Quarterly, 37(3). https://doi.org/10.2307/2600810
Dougherty, J. E., & Pfaltzgraff, R. L. (2001). Contending Theories of International Relations: A Comprehensive Survey (5th ed). Longman.
Doyle, M. W. (1983). Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 12(3), 205–235. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2265298
Doyle, M. W. (1986a). Liberalism and World Politics. American Political Science Review, 80(04), 1151–1169. https://doi.org/10.2307/1960861
Doyle, M. W. (1986b). Liberalism and World Politics. American Political Science Review, 80(04), 1151–1169. https://doi.org/10.2307/1960861
Doyle, M. W. (1990). Thucydidean Realism. Review of International Studies, 16(03). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500112483
Dunne, T. (1995). International Society: Theoretical Promises Fulfilled? Cooperation and Conflict, 30(2), 125–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836795030002002
Dunne, T., Kurki, M., & Smith, S. (Eds.). (2016). International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity (Fourth edition). Oxford University Press.
Edkins, J. (1999). Poststructuralism & International Relations: Bringing the Political Back In: Vol. Critical perspectives on world politics. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Edkins, J., & Zehfuss, M. (2005). Generalising the International. Review of International Studies, 31(03). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210505006583
Enloe, C. (1993a). Are Un Peacekeepers Real Men? and Other Post-Cold War Puzzles. In The Morning After: Sexual Politics at the End of the Cold War (pp. 10–37). University of California Press.
Enloe, C. (1993b). Bananas Militarized and Demilitarized. In The Morning After: Sexual Politics at the End of the Cold War (pp. 102–141). University of California Press.
Enloe, C. (2004). ‘Gender’ Is Not Enough: The Need for a Feminist Consciousness. International Affairs, 80(1). http://findit.royalholloway.ac.uk/primo_library/libweb/action/openurl?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft.jtitle=International+Affairs&rft.atitle=%27Gender%27+Is+Not+Enough%3A+The+Need+for+a+Feminist+Consciousness&rft.volume=80&rft.issn=00205850&rft.issue=1&rft.date=2004&rft.aufirst=Cynthia&rft.aulast=Enloe&vid=44ROY_Services_page&institution=44ROY&url_ctx_val=&url_ctx_fmt=null&isSerivcesPage=true
Enloe, C. H. (2000). Bananas, Beaches and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics. University of California Press.
Epstein, C. (2008). The Power of Words in International Relations: Birth of an Anti-Whaling Discourse: Vol. Politics, science, and the environment. MIT Press.
Fanon, F., Philcox, R., Sartre, J.-P., Bhabha, H. K., & West, C. (2021). The Wretched of the Earth (60th anniversary edition). Grove Press.
Forde, S. (1992). Varieties of Realism: Thucydides and Machiavelli. The Journal of Politics, 54(2), 372–393. https://doi.org/10.2307/2132031
Foucault, M. (1991). What Is An Author? In The Foucault Reader (pp. 101–120). Penguin.
Fukuyama, F. (1989). The End of History? The National Interest, 16, 3–18. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24027184
Gale, F. (1998). Cave ’Cave! Hic Dragones’ : A Neo-Gramscian Deconstruction and Reconstruction of International Regime Theory. Review of International Political Economy, 5(2), 252–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/096922998347561
Gamble, A. (1999). Marxism After Communism: Beyond Realism and Historicism. Review Of International Studies, 25(5), 27–144.
Garst, D. (1989). Thucydides and Neorealism. International Studies Quarterly, 33(1), 3–27. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600491
Genest, M. A. (2004). Conflict and Cooperation: Evolving Theories of International Relations (2nd ed). Thomson/Wadsworth.
Germain, R. D., & Kenny, M. (1998). Engaging Gramsci: International Relations Theory and the New Gramscians. Review Of International Studies, 24(1).
Gill, S. (1993a). Gramsci, Historical Materialism and International Relations: Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press.
Gill, S. (1993b). Gramsci, Historical Materialism and International Relations: Vol. Cambridge Studies in International Relations. Cambridge University Press. http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=13397720900002671&institutionId=2671&customerId=2670
Gill, S., & Law, D. (1988). Marxism and the World System. In The Global Political Economy: Perspectives, Problems, and Policies (pp. 54–70). Johns Hopkins University Press.
Gill, S. R., & Law, D. (1989). Global Hegemony and the Structural Power of Capital. International Studies Quarterly, 33(4), 475–199.
Gills, B. K. (1987). Historical Materialism and International Relations Theory. Millennium - Journal of International Studies, 16(2), 265–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298870160020301
Gilpin, R. (2002a). The Rise of American Hegemony. In Britain 1846-1914 and the United States 1941-2001. Ashgate Pub Ltd.
Gilpin, R. (2002b). The Rise of American Hegemony. In Two Hegemonies: Britain 1846-1914 and the United States 1941-2001 (pp. 165–182). Ashgate Publishing Ltd. https://web.archive.org/web/20130323092826/https://www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel/ipe/gilpin.htm
Gilpin, R. G. (1984). The Richness of the Tradition of Political Realism. International Organization, 38(02). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300026710
Gilpin, R. G. (1996). No One Loves a Political Realist. Security Studies, 5(3), 3–26.
Gilpin, R., & Gilpin, J. M. (1987). The Political Economy of International Relations. Princeton University Press.
Goldgeier, J. M., & McFaul, M. (1992). A Tale of Two Worlds: Core and Periphery in the Post-Cold War Era. International Organization, 46(02). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027788
Grieco, J. M. (1993). Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism. In Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate: Vol. New Directions in World Politics (pp. 116–142). Columbia University Press.
Grotius, H., & Campbell, A. C. (1814). On the Laws of War and Peace. https://web.archive.org/web/20171020013519/http://www.constitution.org/gro/djbp.htm
Grotius, H., & Neff, S. C. (2012). Hugo Grotius on the Law of War and Peace (Student ed). Cambridge University Press.
Grovogui, S. N. (2002). Regimes of Sovereignty: International Morality and the African Condition. European Journal of International Relations, 8(3), 315–338.
Grunberg, I. (1990). Exploring the "Myth” of Hegemonic Stability. International Organization, 44(04). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300035372
Gusterson, H. (2005). Nuclear Weapons and the Other in the Western Imagination. In People of the Bomb: Portraits of America’s Nuclear Complex (pp. 21–47). University of Minnesota Press.
H. Herz, J. (1957). Rise and Demise of The Territorial State. World Politics, 9(4), 473–493. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2009421?sid=primo&origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Halliday, F. (1994). A Necessary Encounter: Historical Materialism and International Relations. In Rethinking International Relations. Macmillan.
Haslam, J. (2002). No Virtue Like Necessity: Realist Thought in International Relations Since Machiavelli. Yale University Press.
Herz, J. H. (1942). Power Politics and World Organization. The American Political Science Review, 36(6). https://doi.org/10.2307/1949064
Hobbes, T. (1999). The Natural Conditions of Mankind. In International Relations Theory: Realism, Pluralism, Globalism, and Beyond (3rd ed, pp. 94–98). Allyn and Bacon.
Hobson, J. M. (2005). The Enduring Place of Hierarchy in World Politics: Tracing the Social Logics of Hierarchy and Political Change. European Journal of International Relations, 11(1), 63–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066105050137
Hoffmann, S. (1977). An American Social Science: International Relations. Daedalus, 106(3), 41–60. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20024493
Hoffmann, S. (1987a). An American Social Science: International Relations. In Janus and Minerva: Essays in the Theory and Practice of International Politics (pp. 219–221). Westview.
Hoffmann, S. (1987b). Liberalism and International Affairs. In Janus and Minerva: Essays in the Theory and Practice of International Politics (pp. 394–417).
Hopf, T. (1998). The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory. International Security, 23(1), 171–200. https://doi.org/10.2307/2539267
Howe, P. (1994). The Utopian Realism of E. H. Carr. Review of International Studies, 20(3), 277–297. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500118078
Hurrell, A. (2003). Order and Justice in International Relations: What is at Stake? In Order and Justice in International Relations. Oxford University Press.
Ikenberry, G. J. (2009a). Liberal Internationalism 3.0: America and the Dilemmas of Liberal World Order. Perspectives on Politics, 7(1), 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592709090112
Ikenberry, G. J. (2009b). Liberal Internationalism 3.0: America and the Dilemmas of Liberal World Order. Perspectives on Politics, 7(01), 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592709090112
Jackson, R., & Sorensen, G. (2003). Introduction to International Relations: Theories and Approaches (Rev. and expanded 2nd ed). Oxford University Press.
James, A. (1989). The Realism of Realism: The State and the Study of International Relations. Review of International Studies, 15(03). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500112847
Jervis, R. (1999). Realism, Neoliberalism, and Cooperation: Understanding the Debate. International Security, 24(1), 42–63. https://doi.org/10.1162/016228899560040
Jones, A. (1996). Does ‘Gender’ Make the World Go Round? Feminist Critiques of International Relations. Review of International Studies, 22(04). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500118649
Kant, I. (1970a). An Answer to the Question: ‘What is Enlightenment?’. In Kant’s Political Writings: Vol. Cambridge studies in the history and theory of politics. Cambridge University Press.
Kant, I. (1970b). Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch. In Kant’s Political Writings: Vol. Cambridge studies in the history and theory of politics. Cambridge University Press.
Katzenstein, P. J. (1996). The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics: Vol. New directions in world politics. Columbia University Press.
Kegley, C. W., & Blanton, S. L. (2011). World Politics: Trend and Transformation. Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Keohane, R. O. (1984). After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton University Press.
Keohane, R. O. (1986). Neorealism and Its Critics: Vol. New directions in world politics. Columbia University Press.
Keohane, R. O. (2005). After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=5543821
Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (1987). Power and Interdependence Revisited. International Organization, 41(04). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027661
Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (1989). Power and Interdependence (2nd ed). HarperCollins.
Kindleberger, C. P. (1981). Dominance and Leadership in the International Economy: Exploitation, Public Goods, and Free Rides. International Studies Quarterly, 25(2). https://doi.org/10.2307/2600355
Krauthammer, C. (1992). The Unipolar Moment. In Rethinking America’s Security: Beyond Cold War to New World Order (1st ed, pp. 313–344). Norton.
Krebs, R. R., & Jackson, P. T. (2007). Twisting Tongues and Twisting Arms: The Power of Political Rhetoric. European Journal of International Relations, 13(1), 35–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066107074284
Krishna, S. (2001). Race, Amnesia, and the Education of International Relations. Alternatives, 26(4).
Lake, D. A. (1993). Leadership, Hegemony, and the International Economy: Naked Emperor or Tattered Monarch With Potential? International Studies Quarterly, 37(4). http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600841
Legro, J. W., & Moravcsik, A. (1999). Is Anybody Still a Realist? International Security, 24(2), 5–55. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2539248
Lenin, V. I. (1963). Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism: A Popular Outline. Progress Publishers. https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1916/imp-hsc/
Lenin, V. I. (1973a). Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism : A Popular Outline. Foreign Languages Press.
Lenin, V. I. (1973b). Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism : A Popular Outline. Foreign Languages Press.
Ling, L. H. M. (1996). Hegemony and the Internationalizing State: A Post‐colonial Analysis of China’s Integration Into Asian Corporatism. Review of International Political Economy, 3(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692299608434343
Linklater, A. (1986a). Realism, Marxism and Critical International Theory. Review of International Studies, 12(04). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500113865
Linklater, A. (1986b). Realism, Marxism and Critical International Theory. Review of International Studies, 12(4), 301–312. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500113865
Linklater, A. (1997). The Transformation of Political Community: E. H. Carr, Critical Theory and International Relations. Review Of International Studies, 23(3).
Linklater, A. (2004). Dominant and Destructive Masculinities. International Affairs, 80(1). http://findit.royalholloway.ac.uk/primo_library/libweb/action/openurl?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft.jtitle=International+Affairs&rft.atitle=Dominant+and+Destructive+Masculinities&rft.volume=80&rft.issn=00205850&rft.issue=1&rft.date=2004&rft.aufirst=Andrew&rft.aulast=Linklater&vid=44ROY_Services_page&institution=44ROY&url_ctx_val=&url_ctx_fmt=null&isSerivcesPage=true
Linklater, A. (2005). Marxism. In Theories of International Relations (3rd Edition, pp. 110–136). Palgrave Macmillan. http://lib.myilibrary.com/Open.aspx?id=85685
Lynch, C. (1994). E.H. Carr, International Relations Theory, and the Societal Origins of International Legal Norms. Millennium - Journal of International Studies, 23(3), 589–619. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298940230030801
Macchiavell, N. (1996). Excerpts from ‘The Prince’ in Classics of International Relations. In Classics of International Relations (3rd ed, pp. 15–20). Prentice Hall.
Machiavelli, N., & Marriott, W. K. (1505). The Prince. https://web.archive.org/web/20060101054818/http://www.ilt.columbia.edu/publications/machiavelli.html
MacLean, J. (1981). Marxist Epistemology, Explanations of ‘Change’ and the Study of International Relations. In Change and the Study of International Relations: The Evaded Dimension (pp. 46–67). St. Martin’s Press.
Maclean, J. (1988). Marxism and International Relations: A Strange Case of Mutual Neglect. Millennium - Journal of International Studies, 17(2), 295–319. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298880170021201
Marx, K., Engels, F., & Tucker, R. C. (1978a). Economic and Philosophic Manuscript of 1844. In The Marx-Engels Reader (2d ed, pp. 66–125). Norton.
Marx, K., Engels, F., & Tucker, R. C. (1978b). Wage, Labour and Capital. In The Marx-Engels Reader (2d ed, pp. 203–217). Norton.
Marx, K., Engels, F., & Tucker, R. C. (1978c). Wage, Labour and Capital. In The Marx-Engels Reader (2d ed, pp. 203–217). Norton.
Marx, K., & Tucker, R. C. (1978a). Economic and Philosophic Manuscript of 1844. In The Marx-Engels Reader (2d ed, pp. 66–125). Norton.
Marx, K., & Tucker, R. C. (1978b). Theories of Surplus Value. In The Marx-Engels Reader (2d ed, pp. 443–468). Norton.
Mastanduno, M. (1997). Preserving the Unipolar Moment: Realist Theories and U.S. Grand Strategy After the Cold War. International Security, 21(4). https://doi.org/10.2307/2539283
McClintock, A. (1992). The Angel of Progress: Pitfalls of the Term ‘Post-Colonialism’. Social Text, 31/32. https://doi.org/10.2307/466219
McKeown, T. J. (1983). Hegemonic Stability Theory and 19th Century Tariff Levels in Europe. International Organization, 37(01). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300004203
Mearsheimer, J. J. (1994). The False Promise of International Institutions. International Security, 19(3). https://doi.org/10.2307/2539078
Mearsheimer, J. J. (2005). E.H. Carr vs. Idealism: The Battle Rages On. International Relations, 19(2), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117805052810
Merrington, J. (1978). Theory and Practice in Gramsci’s Marxism. In Western Marxism: A Critical Reader (pp. 140–175). Verso.
Milliken, Jennifer. (1999). The Study of Discourse in International Relations: A Critique of Research and Methods. European Journal of International Relations, 5(2).
Milner, H. (1992). International Theories of Cooperation Among Nations: Strengths and Weaknesses. World Politics, 44(03), 466–496. https://doi.org/10.2307/2010546
Modelski, G. (1978). The Long Cycle of Global Politics and the Nation-State. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 20(02). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417500008914
Moravcsik, A. (1997). Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics. International Organization, 52(1). http://www.jstor.org/stable/2601333
Morgenthau, H. (1948). The Political Science of E. H. Carr. World Politics, 1(1), 127–134. https://doi.org/10.2307/2009162
Morgenthau, H. J. (1974). Scientific Man vs. Power Politics: Vol. Midway reprint. University of Chicago Press.
Morgenthau, H. J. (2006a). A Realist Theory of International Politics. In Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace (7th ed). McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
Morgenthau, H. J. (2006b). Different Methods of the Balance of Power. In Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace (7th ed). McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
Morgenthau, H. J. (2006c). The Balance of Power. In Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace (7th ed). McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
Morton, Adam David, B., Andreas ;, Bieler, A., & Morton, A. D. (2001). The Gordian Knot of Agency-Structure in International Relations: A Neo-Gramscian Perspective. European Journal of International Relations, 7(1).
Murphy, C. N. (1998). Understanding IR: Understanding Gramsci. Review Of International Studies, 24(3).
Neumann, I. B. (2008). The Body of the Diplomat. European Journal of International Relations, 14(4), 671–695. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066108097557
Niebuhr, R. (2005). Moral Man and Immoral Society: A Study in Ethics and Politics: Vol. Continuum impacts. Continuum.
ÓTuathail, G. (2002). Theorizing Practical Geopolitical Reasoning: The Case of the United States’ Response to the War in Bosnia. Political Geography, 21(5), 601–628. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0962-6298(02)00009-4
Palan, R. P., & Blair, B. M. (1993). On the Idealist Origins of the Realist Theory of International Relations. Review of International Studies, 19(04). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500118273
Paul, T. V. (2016). Recasting Statecraft - International Relations and Strategies of Peaceful Change: Vol. Presidential Address International Studies Association (ISA), 57th Annual Convention. http://www.tvpaul.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/ISA_Presidential_Address.pdf
Powell, R. (1994). Anarchy in International Relations Theory: The Neorealist-Neoliberal Debate. International Organization, 48(02). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300028204
Price, R., & Reus-Smit, C. (1998). Dangerous Liaisons? Critical International Theory and Constructivism. European Journal of International Relations, 4(3).
Reus-Smit, C. (2005). Constructivism. In Theories of International Relations (3rd Edition, pp. 188–212). Palgrave Macmillan. http://lib.myilibrary.com/Open.aspx?id=85685
Rosecrance, R. (1987). Long Cycle Theory and International Relations. International Organization, 41(2), 283–301. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027478
Rosenberg, J. (1996). Isaac Deutscher and the Lost History of International Relations. New Left Review, 215. https://newleftreview.org/issues/I215/articles/justin-rosenberg-isaac-deutscher-and-the-lost-history-of-international-relations
Ruggie, J. G. (1982). International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order. International Organization, 36(02). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300018993
Ruggie, J. G. (1998). What Makes the World Hang Together? Neo-Utilitarianism and the Social Constructivist Challenge. International Organization, 52(4).
Rupert, M. (1995). Producing Hegemony: The Politics of Mass Production and American Global Power: Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press.
Said, E. (1991). The Scope of Orientalism. In Orientalism. Penguin.
Santos, T. D. (1970). The Structure of Dependence. American Economic Review, 60(2), 231–236.
Shaw, M. (2002). Post-Imperial and Quasi-Imperial: State and Empire in the Global Era. Millennium - Journal of International Studies, 31(2), 327–336. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298020310020701
Simmons, B. A., & Hopkins, D. J. (2005). The Constraining Power of International Treaties: Theory and Methods. American Political Science Review, 99(04). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055405051920
Skjelsbæk, I. (n.d.). Sexual Violence and War: Mapping Out a Complex Relationship. European Journal of International Relations, 7(2). http://findit.royalholloway.ac.uk/primo_library/libweb/action/openurl?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft.jtitle=European+Journal+of+International+Relations&rft.atitle=Sexual+Violence+and+War%3A+Mapping+Out+a+Complex+Relationship&rft.volume=7&rft.issn=13540661&rft.issue=2&rft.aufirst=Inger&rft.aulast=Skjelsb%C3%A6k&vid=44ROY_Services_page&institution=44ROY&url_ctx_val=&url_ctx_fmt=null&isSerivcesPage=true
Slater, D. (1998). Post-Colonial Questions for Global Times. Review of International Political Economy, 5(4), 647–678. https://doi.org/10.1080/096922998347417
Slaughter, A.-M. (2004). A New World Order. Princeton University Press.
Smith, M. J. (1986). Realist Thought From Weber to Kissinger. London.
Snidal, D. (1985). The Limits of Hegemonic Stability Theory. International Organization, 39(04). https://doi.org/10.1017/S002081830002703X
Sterling-Folker, J. (2000). Competing Paradigms or Birds of a Feather? Constructivism and Neoliberal Institutionalism Compared. International Studies Quarterly, 44(1), 97–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/0020-8833.00150
Stern, M., & Zalewski, M. (2009). Feminist Fatigue(s): Reflections on Feminism and Familiar Fables of Militarisation. Review of International Studies, 35(03). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210509008675
Thucydides. (1954). The Melian Dialogue. In History of the Peloponnesian war: Vol. Penguin classics (pp. 400–408). Penguin.
Thucydides. (1996). The Melian Dialogue. In Classics of International Relations (3rd Edition, pp. 84–90). Prentice Hall.
Thucydides, & Crawley, R. (n.d.). History of the Peloponnesian War. http://people.ucalgary.ca/~vandersp/Courses/texts/thucydi1.html
Tickner, J. A. (1988). Hans Morgenthau’s Principles of Political Realism: A Feminist Reformulation. Millennium - Journal of International Studies, 17(3), 429–440. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298880170030801
Tickner, J. A. (1997). You Just Don’t Understand: Troubled Engagements Between Feminists and IR Theorists. International Studies Quarterly, 41(4), 611–632. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600855?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
True, J. (2005). Feminism. In Theories of International Relations (3rd Edition, pp. 213–234). Palgrave Macmillan. http://lib.myilibrary.com/Open.aspx?id=85685
Vasquez, J. A. (1998). The Power of Power Politics: From Classical Realism to Neotraditionalism: Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press.
Vincent, R. J. (1988). Hedley Bull and Order in International Politics. Millennium - Journal of International Studies, 17(2), 195–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298880170020701
Viotti, P. R., & Kauppi, M. V. (1999). Realism: The State, Power and the Balance of Power. In International Relations Theory: Realism, Pluralism, Globalism, and Beyond (3rd ed, pp. 35–67). Allyn and Bacon.
Wallerstein, I. (1974a). The Modern World-System Vol. 1: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century: Vol. Studies in Social Discontinuity. Academic.
Wallerstein, I. (1974b). The Rise and Future Demise of the World Capitalist System: Concepts for Comparative Analysis. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 16(4), 387–415. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417500007520
Wallerstein, I. (1983). The Three Instances of Hegemony in the History of the Capitalist World-Economy. Comparative Sociology, 24(1), 100–108. https://doi.org/10.1163/156854283X00071
Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of International Politics. McGraw-Hill.
Waltz, K. N. (2001). Man, the State, and War: A Theoretical Analysis (New ed). Columbia University Press.
Wendt, A. (1992). Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics. International Organization, 46(2), 391–425. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027764
Wilson, P. (1998). The Myth of the ‘First Great Debate’. Review of International Studies, 24(4), 1–15. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097558
Wilson, W. (2014). The World Must be Made Safe for Democracy: The Fourteen Points. In K. A. Mingst & J. L. Snyder (eds.) (Eds.), Essential Readings in World Politics: Vol. The Norton series in world politics (Fifth Edition, pp. 4–6). W.W. Norton & Company.
Wolfers, A. (1962). Discord and Collaboration: Essays on International Politics. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Youngs, G. (2004). Feminist International Relations: A Contradiction in Terms? Or: Why Women and Gender Are Essential to Understanding the World ‘We’ Live In*. International Affairs, 80(1), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2004.00367.x
Zacher, M. W., & Matthew, R. A. (1995). Liberal International Theory: Common Threads, Divergent Strands. In Controversies in International Relations Theory: Realism and the Neo-Liberal Challenge (pp. 107–150). Macmillan.
