1.
Shakespeare, W.: King Lear. Nelson, Walton-on-Thames (1997).
2.
Ryan, K.: Introduction. In: King Lear. pp. xxi–lxiv. Penguin, London (2005).
3.
Hunter, G.K.: The Play in Performance. In: King Lear. Penguin, London (2005).
4.
Foakes, R.A.: Introduction. In: King Lear. pp. 1–110. Nelson, Walton-on-Thames (1997).
5.
Bloom, H.: King Lear. In: Shakespeare: The Invention of the Human. pp. 476–515. Fourth Estate, London (1999).
6.
Bayley, J.: The King’s Ship. In: Shakespeare and Tragedy. pp. 7–48. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London (1981).
7.
Booth, S.: Extract. In: King Lear, Macbeth, Indefinition and Tragedy. pp. 5–57. Yale University Press, New Haven (1983).
8.
Berger, H.: King Lear: The Lear Family Romance. In: Making Trifles of Terrors: Redistributing Complicities in Shakespeare. Stanford University Press, Stanford, Calif (1997).
9.
Berger, H.: Text Against Performance:The Gloucester Family Romance. In: Making Trifles of Terrors: Redistributing Complicities in Shakespeare. Stanford University Press, Stanford, Calif (1997).
10.
Woudhuysen, H.R.: Notes on King Lear. In: Samuel Johnson on Shakespeare. pp. 219–223. Penguin, Harmondsworth (1989).
11.
Bate, J.: King Lear. In: The Romantics on Shakespeare. pp. 381–405. Penguin, Harmondsworth (1992).
12.
Hazlitt, W., Quiller-Couch, A.: Lear. In: Characters of Shakespeare’s Plays. Humphrey Milford, London (1939).
13.
Keats, J.: On Sitting Down to Read King Lear Once Again | Poetry Foundation, https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems-and-poets/poems/detail/44482.
14.
Kermode, F.: Part 1: Early Comments and Critiques. In: Shakespeare, King Lear: A Casebook. pp. 25–45. Macmillan Education (1992).
15.
Parker, G.F.: Johnson’s Shakespeare. Clarendon, Oxford (1989).
16.
Bate, J.: The Original Genius. In: The Genius of Shakespeare. Picador, London (1997).
17.
Bate, J.: All the World His Stage. In: The Genius of Shakespeare. pp. 217–250. Picador Classic, London (2016).
18.
Bate, J.: Shakespeare and the English Romantic Imagination. Clarendon, Oxford (1986).
19.
Bate, J.: Shakespearean Constitutions: Politics, Theatre, Criticism, 1730-1830. Clarendon, Oxford (1989).
20.
Badawī, M.M.: Coleridge: Critic of Shakespeare. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1973).
21.
Vickers, B.: Shakespeare: The Critical Heritage 1623-1801. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London (1981).
22.
Bradley, A.C.: ‘Lecture VII: King Lear’ and ‘Lecture VIII: King Lear’. In: Shakespearean Tragedy: Lectures on Hamlet, Othello, King Lear, Macbeth. pp. 182–210. Palgrave Macmillan, Houndsmills, Basingstoke (2007).
23.
Bradley, A.C.: Lecture VIII: King Lear. In: Shakespearean Tragedy: Lectures on Hamlet, Othello, King Lear, Macbeth. pp. 211–251. Palgrave Macmillan, Houndsmills, Basingstoke (2007).
24.
Kermode, F.: Shakespeare, King Lear: A Casebook. Macmillan Educ (1992).
25.
Knight, G.W.: King Lear and the Comedy of the Grotesque. In: The Wheel of Fire: Interpretations of Shakespearean Tragedy, With Three New Essays. pp. 201–234. Routledge, London (1989).
26.
Knight, G.W.: King Lear and the Comedy of the Grotesque. In: The Wheel of Fire: Interpretations of Shakespearian Tragedy. pp. 181–200. Routledge, London (2001).
27.
Knight, G.W.: The Lear Universe. In: The Wheel of Fire: Interpretations of Shakespearean Tragedy, With Three New Essays. pp. 181–200. Routledge, London (1989).
28.
Knight, G.W.: The Lear Universe. In: The Wheel of Fire: Interpretations of Shakespearian Tragedy. pp. 201–234. Routledge, London (1989).
29.
Knight, G.W.: King Lear and the Comedy of the Grotesque. In: Shakespeare, King Lear: A Casebook. pp. 107–122. Macmillan Educ (1992).
30.
Kott, J.: King Lear, or Endgame. In: Shakespeare Our Contemporary. pp. 100–133. Methuen, London (1967).
31.
Kott, J.: King Lear, or Endgame. In: Shakespeare: An Anthology of Criticism and Theory, 1945-2000. pp. 174–190. Blackwell Pub, Malden, MA (1967).
32.
Kettle, A.: From Hamlet to Lear. In: Shakespeare in a Changing World: Essays. pp. 146–171. Lawrence & Wishart, London (1964).
33.
McDonald, R.: Shakespeare: An Anthology of Criticism and Theory, 1945-2000. Blackwell Pub, Malden, MA (2004).
34.
Hibbard, G.R.: King Lear: A Retrospect, 1939–79. In: Muir, K. (ed.) Shakespeare Survey 33. pp. 1–12. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1981). https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL052123249X.001.
35.
Thompson, A.: King Lear. Macmillan, Basingstoke (1988).
36.
McDonald, R.: The "New Criticism” and King Lear. In: Shakespeare: An Anthology of Criticism and Theory, 1945-2000. pp. 63–88. Blackwell Pub, Malden, MA (2004).
37.
Everett, B.: The New King Lear. Critical Quarterly. 2, 325–339 (1960). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8705.1960.tb00882.x.
38.
Beckett, S., Gontarski, S.E.: Endgame. Faber and Faber, London (1992).
39.
Foakes, R.A.: King Lear and Endgame. In: Holland, P. (ed.) Shakespeare Survey 55. pp. 153–158. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002). https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521815878.013.
40.
Taylor, M.: Shakespeare Criticism in the Twentieth Century. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2001).
41.
Greenblatt, S.: Shakespeare and the Exorcists. In: Shakespearean Negotiations: The Circulation of Social Energy in Renaissance England. pp. 94–128. Clarendon, Oxford (1988).
42.
Greenblatt, S.: Shakespeare and the Exorcists. In: Shakespearean Negotiations: The Circulation of Social Energy in Renaissance England. pp. 94–128. University of California Press (1988).
43.
Kahn, C.: The Absent Mother in King Lear. In: King Lear, William Shakespeare. pp. 92–113. Macmillan, Basingstoke (1993).
44.
Goldberg, J.: Perspectives: Dover Cliff and the Conditions of Representation. In: King Lear, William Shakespeare. pp. 145–157. Macmillan, Basingstoke (1993).
45.
Zimmerman, S.: Perspectives: Dover Cliff and the Conditions of Representation. In: Shakespeare’s Tragedies. pp. 155–166. Macmillan, Basingstoke (1998).
46.
Dutton, R.: King Lear. In: A Companion to Shakespeare’s Works - Volume 1: The Tragedies. pp. 375–392. Blackwell, Oxford (2006).
47.
Dutton, R.: King Lear. In: A Companion to Shakespeare’s Works, Volume I: The Tragedies. pp. 375–392. Blackwell, Malden, Mass (2003).
48.
Hibbard, G.R.: King Lear: A Retrospect, 1939–79. In: Muir, K. (ed.) Shakespeare Survey 33. pp. 1–12. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1981). https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL052123249X.001.
49.
Patterson, A.M.: "What Matter Who’s Speaking?”: Hamlet and King Lear. In: Shakespeare and the Popular Voice. pp. 93–119 (1989).
50.
Shakespeare, W., Hunter, G., Ryan, K.: The Popular Voice of King Lear. In: King Lear: Contemporary Critical Essays. pp. 130–144. Penguin, London (2005).
51.
Adelman, J.: Suffocating Mothers in King Lear. In: Suffocating Mothers: Fantasies of Maternal Origin in Shakespeare’s Plays, Hamlet to the Tempest. pp. 103–129. Routledge, New York (1992).
52.
Adelman, J.: Suffocating Mothers in King Lear. In: Suffocating Mothers: Fantasies of Maternal Origin in Shakespeare’s Plays, Hamlet to the Tempest. pp. 103–129. Routledge, New York (1992).
53.
Greenblatt, S.J.: The Cultivation of Anxiety: King Lear and His Heirs. In: Learning to Curse: Essays in Early Modern Culture. pp. 80–98. Routledge, New York (1990).
54.
Evans, M.: Extract. In: Signifying Nothing: Truth’s True Contents in Shakespeare’s Text. pp. 224–234. Harvester, Brighton (1986).
55.
Marcus, L.S.: Retrospective: King Lear on St Stephen’s Night, 1606. In: Puzzling Shakespeare: Local Reading and Its Discontents. pp. 148–159. University of California Press, Berkeley (1988).
56.
Sinfield, A.: The Patriarchal Bard: Feminist Criticism and Shakespeare: King Lear and Measure for Measure. In: Political Shakespeare: Essays in Cultural Materialism. pp. 88–108. Manchester University Press, Manchester (1994).
57.
Yachnin, P.E.: The Properties of Character in King Lear. In: Shakespeare and Character: Theory, History, Performance, and Theatrical Persons. pp. 98–116. Palgrave Macmillan, New York (2009).
58.
Ko, Y.J.: Shakespearean Characters and Early Modern Subjectivity: The Case of King Lear. In: Shakespeare’s Sense of Character: On the Page and From the Stage. pp. 35–52. Ashgate, Farnham, Surrey, England (2012).
59.
Ko, Y.J.: Shakespearean Characters and Early Modern Subjectivity: The Case of King Lear. In: Shakespeare’s Sense of Character: On the Page and From the Stage. pp. 35–52. Ashgate, Farnham (2012).
60.
Bond, E.: Lear. Bloomsbury, London (1972). https://doi.org/10.5040/9781408162996.00000018.
61.
Bond, E.: Plays: 2. Eyre Methuen, London (1978).
62.
Cartelli, T.: Shakespeare in Pain: Edward Bond’s Lear and the Ghosts of History. In: Holland, P. (ed.) Shakespeare Survey 55. pp. 159–169. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002). https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521815878.014.
63.
Field, A.S.: King Lear Versus Lear at Stratford. Critical Quarterly. 24, 5–14 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8705.1982.tb01893.x.
64.
Bond, E.: Drama and the Dialectic of Violence. Theatre Quarterly. 2, 4–14 (1972).
65.
Nodelman, P.: Beyond Politics in Bond’s Lear. Modern Drama. 23, 269–276 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1353/mdr.1980.0011.
66.
Bond, E.: Bingo: Scenes of Money and Death. Methuen, London (1974).
67.
Bond, E.: Plays: 3. Methuen, London (1987).
68.
Bond, E.: The Hidden Plot: Notes on Theatre and the State. Methuen Drama, London (2000).
69.
Bond, E.: The Hidden Plot: Notes on Theatre and the State. Methuen Drama, London (2000).
70.
Hay, M., Roberts, P.: Bond: A Study of His Plays. Methuen, London (1980).
71.
Hirst, D.L.: Edward Bond. Macmillan, London (1985).
72.
Barker, H.: Seven Lears: The Pursuit of Good. In: Plays Five. Oberon Books, London (2009).
73.
Barker, H.: Arguments for a Theatre. Manchester University Press, Manchester (1993).
74.
Barker, H.: A Style and Its Origins. Oberon Books, London (2007).
75.
Rabey, D.I.: Howard Baker: Ecstasy and Death: An Expository Study of His Plays and Production Work, 1988-2008. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2008).
76.
Barker, H.: Death, the One and the Art of Theatre. Routledge, London (2005).
77.
Barker, H.: Death, the One and the Art of Theatre. Routledge, London (2005).
78.
Lamb, C.: The Theatre of Howard Barker. Routledge, London (2005).
79.
Gritzner, K., Rabey, D.I.: Theatre of Catastrophe: New Essays on Howard Barker. London (2006).
80.
Irvine, L.: Podcast: Howard Barker talks | Stage. The Guardian. (2006).
81.
Smiley, J.: A Thousand Acres. Flamingo, London (1992).
82.
Brauner, D.: ‘Speak Again’: The Politics of Rewriting in ‘A Thousand Acres’. The Modern Language Review. 96, 654–666 (2001). https://doi.org/10.2307/3736736.
83.
Sawyer, R.: Remembering King Lear in Jane Smiley’s A Thousand Acres. In: Shakespeare and Appropriation. pp. 85–102. Routledge (1999).
84.
Sawyer, R.: Remembering King Lear in Jane Smiley’s A Thousand Acres. In: Shakespeare and Appropriation. pp. 85–102. Routledge, London (1999).
85.
Novy, M.: King Lear and A Thousand Acres: Gender, Genre and the Revisionary Impulse. In: Transforming Shakespeare: Twentieth-Century Women’s Re-Visions. Macmillan, Basingstoke (1999).
86.
Novy, M.: The Polluted Quarry: Nature and Body in A Thousand Acres. In: Transforming Shakespeare: Twentieth-Century Women’s Re-Visions. Macmillan, Basingstoke (1999).
87.
Faragher, J.M.: The Historical Imagination of A Thousand Acres. In: Novel History: Historians and Novelists Confront America’s Past (And Each Other). pp. 146–159 (2001).
88.
Moorhouse, J.: A Thousand Acres, (2006).
89.
Kott, J.: King Lear, or Endgame. In: Shakespeare Our Contemporary. pp. 100–133. Methuen, London (1967).
90.
Kott, J.: King Lear, or Endgame. In: Shakespeare: An Anthology of Criticism and Theory, 1945-2000. pp. 174–190. Blackwell Pub, Malden, MA (1967).
91.
Holland, P.: Two‑Dimensional Shakespeare: King Lear on Film. In: Shakespeare and the Moving Image: The Plays on Film and Television. pp. 50–68. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1994).
92.
Hodgdon, B.: Two King Lears: Uncovering the Filmtext. Literature/Film Quarterly. 11, 143–151 (1983).
93.
Sokolyansky, M.: Grigori Kozintsev’s Hamlet and King Lear. In: The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare on Film. pp. 203–215. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007).
94.
Sokolyansky, M.: Grigori Kozintsev’s Hamlet and King Lear. In: The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare on Film. pp. 203–215. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007).
95.
Hodgdon, B.: Kozintsev’s King Lear: Filming a Tragic Poem. Literature/Film Quarterly. 5, 291–298 (1977).
96.
Braudy, L.: Finding Shakespeare on Film: From an Interview with Peter Brook. In: Braudy, L. and Cohen, M. (eds.) Film Theory and Criticism: Introductory Readings. Oxford University Press, New York (2016).
97.
Jorgens, J.J.: Chapter 10. In: Shakespeare on Film. University Press of America, Lanham, Md (1991).
98.
Kozintsev, G.M., Mackintosh, M.: ‘King Lear’, the Space of Tragedy: The Diary of a Film Director. Heinemann Educational, London (1977).
99.
Kennedy, D.: Introduction: Shakespeare Without His Language. In: Foreign Shakespeare: Contemporary Performance. pp. 1–18. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1993).
100.
Davies, A.: Kurosawa’s Shakespeare Films: Throne of Blood, The Bad Sleep Well and Ran. In: Shakespeare and the Moving Image: The Plays on Film and Television. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1994).
101.
Linton, J.P.: Kurosawa’s Ran (1985) and Shakespeare’s King Lear: Towards a Conversation on Historical Responsibility’. Quarterly Review of Film and Video. 23, 341–351 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1080/10509200690897608.
102.
Crowl, S.: The Bow Is Bent and Drawn: Kurosawa’s Ran and the Shakespearean Arrow of Desire. Literature Film Quarterly. 22, 109–118 (1994).
103.
Jorgens, J.J.: Chapter 10. In: Shakespeare on Film. University Press of America, Lanham, Md (1991).
104.
Kennedy, D.: Shakespeare and the Visual. In: Looking at Shakespeare: A Visual History of Twentieth-Century Performance. Cambridge University Press, New York (2001).
105.
Shakespeare, W., Orgel, S.: The Tempest. Clarendon, Oxford (1987).
106.
Hulme, P., Sherman, W.H.: The Tempest: Sources and Contexts, Criticism, Rewritings and Appropriations. W. W. Norton, New York (2004).
107.
Orgel, S.: Introduction. In: The Tempest. Clarendon, Oxford (1987).
108.
McDonald, R.: Reading The Tempest. In: Wells, S. (ed.) Shakespeare Survey 43. pp. 15–28. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1991). https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521395291.002.
109.
Holland, P.: The Shapeliness of The Tempest. Essays in Criticism. XLV, 208–229 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1093/eic/XLV.3.208.
110.
Neill, M.: ‘Noises, / Sounds, and Sweet Airs’: The Burden of Shakespeare’s ‘Tempest’. Shakespeare Quarterly. 59, 36–59 (2008).
111.
Magnusson, A.L.: Interruption in ‘The Tempest’. Shakespeare Quarterly. 37, 52–65 (1986). https://doi.org/10.2307/2870191.
112.
Kott, J.: Prospero’s Staff. In: Shakespeare Our Contemporary. Methuen, London (1967).
113.
Ryan, K.: The Tempest: The Complicities of Art. In: Shakespeare. Palgrave, Basingstoke (2002).
114.
Ryan, K.: The Tempest: The Complicities of Art. In: Shakespeare. Palgrave, Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire (2002).
115.
Palmer, D.J.: Extract. In: Shakespeare, The Tempest: A Casebook. pp. 34–71. Macmillan, London (1968).
116.
Johnson, S.: Extract. In: Samuel Johnson on Shakespeare. pp. 166–169. Penguin, Harmondsworth (1989).
117.
Bate, J.: Extract. In: The Romantics on Shakespeare. pp. 60–66. Penguin, Harmondsworth (1992).
118.
Parker, G.F.: Johnson’s Shakespeare. Clarendon, Oxford (1989).
119.
Donohue, J.W.: Dramatic Character in the English Romantic Age. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J. (1970).
120.
Badawī, M.M.: Coleridge: Critic of Shakespeare. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1973).
121.
Bate, J.: Shakespeare and the English Romantic Imagination. Clarendon, Oxford (1986).
122.
Bate, J.: Shakespearean Constitutions: Politics, Theatre, Criticism, 1730-1830. Clarendon, Oxford (1989).
123.
Vickers, B.: Shakespeare, the Critical Heritage - Volume 1, 1623-1692. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London (1974).
124.
Vickers, B.: Shakespeare, the Critical Heritage - Volume 2, 1693-1733. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London (1974).
125.
Vickers, B.: Shakespeare, the Critical Heritage - Volume 3, 1733-1752. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London (1975).
126.
Vickers, B.: Shakespeare, the Critical Heritage - Volume 4, 1753-1765. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London (1976).
127.
Vickers, B.: Shakespeare, the Critical Heritage - Volume 5, 1765-1774. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London (1979).
128.
Vickers, B.: Shakespeare, the Critical Heritage - Volume 6, 1774-1801. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London (1981).
129.
Palmer, D.J.: Introduction to The Tempest. In: Shakespeare, the Tempest: A Casebook. Macmillan, London (1967).
130.
Palmer, D.J.: Shakespeare’s Dream. In: Shakespeare, the Tempest: A Casebook. pp. 109–129. Macmillan, London (1968).
131.
Knight, G.W.: The Shakespearian Superman: A Study of The Tempest. In: The Crown of Life: Essays in Interpretation of Shakespeare’s Final Plays. pp. 203–255. Methuen, London (1965).
132.
Edwards, P.: Shakespeare’s Romances: 1900–1957. In: Nicoll, A. (ed.) Shakespeare Survey 11. pp. 1–18. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1958). https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521064244.001.
133.
Ryan, K.: Introduction. In: Shakespeare: The Last Plays. pp. 4–12. Longman (1999).
134.
Kay, C.M.: An Overview of Critical Approaches to the Romances. In: Shakespeare’s Romances Reconsidered. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln (1978).
135.
Strachey, L.: Shakespeare’s Final Period. In: Books and Characters: French and English. Chatto and Windus, London (1922).
136.
Raleigh, W.: The Last Phase. In: Shakespeare. Macmillan, London (1907).
137.
Greenblatt, S.J.: Martial Law in the Land of Cockaigne. In: Shakespearean Negotiations: The Circulation of Social Energy in Renaissance England. pp. 129–163. Clarendon, Oxford (1988).
138.
Wood, N.: Political Criticism at the Crossroads: The Utopian Historicism. In: The Tempest. pp. 29–66. Open University Press, Buckingham (1995).
139.
Brown, P.: This Thing of Darkness I Acknowledge Mine. In: Political Shakespeare: Essays in Cultural Materialism. pp. 48–71. Manchester University Press, Manchester (1994).
140.
Ryan, K.: Introduction. In: Shakespeare: The Last Plays. pp. 1–21. Longman (1999).
141.
Ryan, K.: "What Cares These Roarers for the Name of King?”: Language and Utopia in The Tempest. In: Shakespeare: The Last Plays. pp. 245–278. Longman (1999).
142.
Hawkes, T.: Playhouse-Workhouse. In: That Shakespearian Rag: Essays on a Critical Process. pp. 1–26. Methuen, London (1986).
143.
Gillies, J.: Extract. In: Shakespeare and the Geography of Difference. pp. 140–155. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1994).
144.
Greenblatt, S.: Learning to Curse: Aspects of Linguistic Colonialism in the Sixteenth Century. In: Learning to Curse: Essays in Early Modern Culture. pp. 22–51. Routledge, New York (1990).
145.
Greenblatt, S.: Learning to Curse: Aspects of Linguistic Colonialism in the Sixteenth Century. In: Learning to Curse: Essays in Early Modern Culture. pp. 22–51. Routledge, New York (1990).
146.
Clark, S.: The Tempest, or The Enchanted Island. In: Shakespeare Made Fit: Restoration Adaptations of Shakespeare. pp. 79–185. Everyman, London (1997).
147.
Dobson, M.: ‘Remember/First to Possess his Books’: The Appropriation of The Tempest 1700-1800. In: Wells, S. (ed.) Shakespeare Survey 43. pp. 99–108. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1991). https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521395291.009.
148.
Maus, K.E.: ‘Arcadia Host: Politics and Revision in the Restoration’ Tempest. Renaissance Drama. 13, 189–209 (1982).
149.
Wikander, M.H.: ‘The Duke my Father’s Wrack’: The Innocence of the Restoration Tempest. In: Wells, S. (ed.) Shakespeare Survey 43. pp. 91–98. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1991). https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521395291.008.
150.
DiPietro, C.: Seeing Places: The Tempest and the Baroque Spectacle of the Restoration Theatre. Shakespeare. 9, 168–186 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/17450918.2013.784849.
151.
Nicholl, A.: Three Adaptations. In: Nicoll, A. (ed.) Shakespeare Survey 13. pp. 137–145. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1960).
152.
Browning, R.: Caliban Upon Setebos | Poetry Foundation, https://web.archive.org/web/20170407155817/https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems-and-poets/poems/detail/43748.
153.
Plath, S.: Full Fathom Five. In: The Colossus. pp. 46–47. Faber, London (1967).
154.
Plath, S.: Ariel. Faber, London (1965).
155.
Plath, S.: Ariel | Poetry Foundation, https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems-and-poets/poems/detail/49001.
156.
Plath, S.: Full Fathom Five | Digital-Shakespeare, http://digital-shakespeare.angelfire.com/fullfathomplath.html.
157.
Hughes, T.: Setebos. In: Birthday Letters. Faber, London (1998).
158.
Hughes, T.: Night-Ride on Ariel. In: Birthday Letters. Faber, London (1998).
159.
Hughes, T.: Freedom of Speech. In: Birthday Letters. Faber, London (1998).
160.
Hughes, T.: Setebos | Immrama, http://immrama.blogspot.co.uk/2004/12/setebos-ted-hughes.html.
161.
Shaw, D.: Extract. In: The Dialectical Temper: The Rhetorical Art of Robert Browning. pp. 193–203. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, N.Y. (1968).
162.
Sawyer, R.: The Shakespeareanization of Robert Browning. In: Shakespeare and Appropriation. pp. 142–159. Routledge (1999).
163.
Desmet, C.: The Shakespeareanization of Robert Browning. In: Shakespeare and Appropriation. pp. 142–159. Routledge, London (1999).
164.
Slinn, E.W.: Extract. In: Browning and the Fictions of Identity. pp. 84–90. Macmillan, London (1982).
165.
Wagner, E.: Ariel’s Gift: Ted Hughes, Sylvia Plath and the Story of Birthday Letters. Norton, New York (2001).
166.
Rose, J.: The Haunting of Sylvia Plath. Virago, London (1991).
167.
Malcolm, J.: Silent Woman: Sylvia Plath and Ted Hughes. Papermac (1995).
168.
Kirsch, A.: Introduction and Commentary. In: The Sea and the Mirror: A Commentary on Shakespeare’s the Tempest. pp. xi–xliii. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J. (2003).
169.
Auden, W.H.: Balaam and his Ass: On the Literary Use of the Master-Servant Relationship. In: The Dyer’s Hand: And Other Essays. pp. 107–145. Faber, London (1963).
170.
Auden, W.H.: Balaam and The Ass: On the Literary Use of the Master-Servant Relationship. Encounter. 35–53 (1954).
171.
Smith, S.: Extract. In: W. H. Auden. pp. 153–160. Blackwell, Oxford (1985).
172.
Fuller, J.: Extract. In: A Reader’s Guide to W. H. Auden. pp. 157–165. Thames & Hudson Ltd, London (1970).
173.
Greenberg, H.: Extract. In: Quest for the Necessary: W. H. Auden and the Dilemma of Divided Consciousness. pp. 122–141. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass (1968).
174.
McDowell, F.P.W.: The Sea and the Mirror. In: Auden: A Collection of Critical Essays. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J. (1964).
175.
Shakespeare, W., Jarman, D., Williams, H.: The Tempest, (1979).
176.
Greenaway, P., Shakespeare, W.: Prospero’s Books, (2010).
177.
Buchanan, J.: Historically Juxtaposed Beans (II): The Tempest on Film. In: Shakespeare on Film. pp. 150–183. Longman, Harlow (2005).
178.
Buchanan, J.: The Tempest on Film. In: Shakespeare on Film. Pearson Longman, Harlow, England (2005).
179.
Bulman, J.C.: Drowning the Book: Prospero’s Books and the Textual Shakespeare. In: Shakespeare, Theory, and Performance. pp. 189–212. Routledge, London (1996).
180.
Bulman, J.C.: Drowning the Book: Prospero’s Books and the Textual Shakespeare. In: Shakespeare, Theory and Performance. pp. 189–212. Routledge, London (1996).
181.
Shaughnessy, R.: A Post-National European Cinema: A Consideration of Derek Jarman’s The Tempest and Edward II. In: Shakespeare on Film. pp. 145–155. Macmillan (1998).
182.
Boose, L.E.: Shakespeare in the Age of Post-Mechanical Reproduction: Sexual and Electronic Magic in Prospero’s Books. In: Shakespeare, The Movie: Popularizing the Plays on Film, TV and Video. pp. 172–189. Taylor and Francis, Hoboken (1997).
183.
Boose, L.E.: Shakespeare in the Age of Post-Mechanical Reproduction: Sexual and Electronic Magic in Prospero’s Books. In: Shakespeare, the Movie: Popularizing the Plays on Film, TV and Video. pp. 172–189. Routledge, London (1997).
184.
Greenaway, P.: Prospero’s Books: A Film of Shakespeare’s the Tempest. Chatto & Windus, London (1991).
185.
Shakespeare, W., Taymor, J.: The Tempest | Box of Broadcasts, https://learningonscreen.ac.uk/ondemand/index.php/prog/05A9694D?bcast=123986425, (2010).
186.
Cartmell, D.: Shakespeare, Film and Race: Screening Othello and The Tempest. In: Interpreting Shakespeare on Screen. pp. 67–93. St. Martin’s Press, New York (2000).
187.
Sibley-Esposito, C.: Becoming-Ariel: Viewing Julie Taymor’s The Tempest through an Ecocritical Lens. Babel. 121–134 (2011). https://doi.org/10.4000/babel.156.
188.
Holderness, G.: Radical Potentiality and Institutional Closure: Shakespeare in Film and Television. In: Political Shakespeare: Essays in Cultural Materialism. pp. 206–225. Manchester University Press, Manchester (1994).
189.
Hopkins, L.: Shakespeare’s the Tempest: The Relationship Between Text and Film. Methuen Drama, London (2008).
190.
Taymor, J., Shakespeare, W.: The Tempest. Abrams, New York (2010).
