Adelman, Janet. 1992a. ‘Suffocating Mothers in King Lear’. Pp. 103–29 in Suffocating Mothers: Fantasies of Maternal Origin in Shakespeare’s Plays, Hamlet to the Tempest. New York: Routledge.
Adelman, Janet. 1992b. ‘Suffocating Mothers in King Lear’. Pp. 103–29 in Suffocating Mothers: Fantasies of Maternal Origin in Shakespeare’s Plays, Hamlet to the Tempest. New York: Routledge.
Auden, W. H. 1954. ‘Balaam and The Ass: On the Literary Use of the Master-Servant Relationship’. Encounter (July):35–53.
Auden, W. H. 1963. ‘Balaam and His Ass: On the Literary Use of the Master-Servant Relationship’. Pp. 107–45 in The Dyer’s Hand: And Other Essays. London: Faber.
Badawī, Muḥammad Muṣṭafá. 1973a. Coleridge: Critic of Shakespeare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Badawī, Muḥammad Muṣṭafá. 1973b. Coleridge: Critic of Shakespeare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Barker, Howard. 1993. Arguments for a Theatre. 2nd Edition. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Barker, Howard. 2005a. Death, the One and the Art of Theatre. London: Routledge.
Barker, Howard. 2005b. Death, the One and the Art of Theatre. London: Routledge.
Barker, Howard. 2007. A Style and Its Origins. London: Oberon Books.
Barker, Howard. 2009. ‘Seven Lears: The Pursuit of Good’. in Plays Five. London: Oberon Books.
Bate, Jonathan. 1986a. Shakespeare and the English Romantic Imagination. Oxford: Clarendon.
Bate, Jonathan. 1986b. Shakespeare and the English Romantic Imagination. Oxford: Clarendon.
Bate, Jonathan. 1989a. Shakespearean Constitutions: Politics, Theatre, Criticism, 1730-1830. Oxford: Clarendon.
Bate, Jonathan. 1989b. Shakespearean Constitutions: Politics, Theatre, Criticism, 1730-1830. Oxford: Clarendon.
Bate, Jonathan. 1992a. ‘Extract’. Pp. 60–66 in The Romantics on Shakespeare. Vol. New Penguin Shakespeare library. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Bate, Jonathan. 1992b. ‘King Lear’. Pp. 381–405 in The Romantics on Shakespeare. Vol. New Penguin Shakespeare library. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Bate, Jonathan. 1997. ‘The Original Genius’. in The Genius of Shakespeare. London: Picador.
Bate, Jonathan. 2016. ‘All the World His Stage’. Pp. 217–50 in The Genius of Shakespeare. London: Picador Classic.
Bayley, John. 1981. ‘The King’s Ship’. Pp. 7–48 in Shakespeare and Tragedy. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Beckett, Samuel, and S. E. Gontarski. 1992. Endgame. Vol. The theatrical notebooks of Samuel Beckett. London: Faber and Faber.
Berger, Harry. 1997a. ‘King Lear: The Lear Family Romance’. in Making Trifles of Terrors: Redistributing Complicities in Shakespeare. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press.
Berger, Harry. 1997b. ‘Text Against Performance:The Gloucester Family Romance’. in Making Trifles of Terrors: Redistributing Complicities in Shakespeare. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press.
Bloom, Harold. 1999. ‘King Lear’. Pp. 476–515 in Shakespeare: The Invention of the Human. London: Fourth Estate.
Bond, Edward. 1972a. ‘Drama and the Dialectic of Violence’. Theatre Quarterly 2(5):4–14.
Bond, Edward. 1972b. Lear. edited by P. Hern. London: Bloomsbury.
Bond, Edward. 1974. Bingo: Scenes of Money and Death. Vol. Methuen’s modern plays. London: Methuen.
Bond, Edward. 1978. Plays: 2. London: Eyre Methuen.
Bond, Edward. 1987. Plays: 3. London: Methuen.
Bond, Edward. 2000a. The Hidden Plot: Notes on Theatre and the State. London: Methuen Drama.
Bond, Edward. 2000b. The Hidden Plot: Notes on Theatre and the State. London: Methuen Drama.
Boose, Lynda E. 1997a. ‘Shakespeare in the Age of Post-Mechanical Reproduction: Sexual and Electronic Magic in Prospero’s Books’. Pp. 172–89 in Shakespeare, The Movie: Popularizing the Plays on Film, TV and Video. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis.
Boose, Lynda E. 1997b. ‘Shakespeare in the Age of Post-Mechanical Reproduction: Sexual and Electronic Magic in Prospero’s Books’. Pp. 172–89 in Shakespeare, the Movie: Popularizing the Plays on Film, TV and Video. London: Routledge.
Booth, Stephen. 1983. ‘Extract’. Pp. 5–57 in King Lear, Macbeth, Indefinition and Tragedy. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Bradley, A. C. 2007a. ‘“Lecture VII: King Lear” and “Lecture VIII: King Lear”’. Pp. 182–210 in Shakespearean Tragedy: Lectures on Hamlet, Othello, King Lear, Macbeth. Houndsmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bradley, A. C. 2007b. ‘Lecture VIII: King Lear’. Pp. 211–51 in Shakespearean Tragedy: Lectures on Hamlet, Othello, King Lear, Macbeth. Houndsmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Braudy, Leo. 2016. ‘Finding Shakespeare on Film: From an Interview with Peter Brook’. in Film Theory and Criticism: Introductory Readings, edited by L. Braudy and M. Cohen. New York: Oxford University Press.
Brauner, David. 2001. ‘“Speak Again”: The Politics of Rewriting in “A Thousand Acres”’. The Modern Language Review 96(3):654–66. doi: 10.2307/3736736.
Brown, Paul. 1994. ‘This Thing of Darkness I Acknowledge Mine’. Pp. 48–71 in Political Shakespeare: Essays in Cultural Materialism. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Browning, Robert. n.d. ‘Caliban Upon Setebos | Poetry Foundation’. Retrieved (https://web.archive.org/web/20170407155817/https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems-and-poets/poems/detail/43748).
Buchanan, Judith. 2005a. ‘Historically Juxtaposed Beans (II): The Tempest on Film’. Pp. 150–83 in Shakespeare on Film. Vol. Inside film. Harlow: Longman.
Buchanan, Judith. 2005b. ‘The Tempest on Film’. in Shakespeare on Film. Harlow, England: Pearson Longman.
Bulman, James C. 1996a. ‘Drowning the Book: Prospero’s Books and the Textual Shakespeare’. Pp. 189–212 in Shakespeare, Theory, and Performance. London: Routledge.
Bulman, James C. 1996b. ‘Drowning the Book: Prospero’s Books and the Textual Shakespeare’. Pp. 189–212 in Shakespeare, Theory and Performance. London: Routledge.
Cartelli, Thomas. 2002. ‘Shakespeare in Pain: Edward Bond’s Lear and the Ghosts of History’. Pp. 159–69 in Shakespeare Survey 55, edited by P. Holland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cartmell, Deborah. 2000. ‘Shakespeare, Film and Race: Screening Othello and The Tempest’. Pp. 67–93 in Interpreting Shakespeare on Screen. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Clark, Sandra. 1997. ‘The Tempest, or The Enchanted Island’. Pp. 79–185 in Shakespeare Made Fit: Restoration Adaptations of Shakespeare. London: Everyman.
Crowl, Samuel. 1994. ‘The Bow Is Bent and Drawn: Kurosawa’s Ran and the Shakespearean Arrow of Desire.’ Literature Film Quarterly 22(2):109–18.
Davies, Anthony. 1994. ‘Kurosawa’s Shakespeare Films: Throne of Blood, The Bad Sleep Well and Ran’. in Shakespeare and the Moving Image: The Plays on Film and Television. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Desmet, Christy. 1999. ‘The Shakespeareanization of Robert Browning’. Pp. 142–59 in Shakespeare and Appropriation. London: Routledge.
DiPietro, Cary. 2013. ‘Seeing Places: The Tempest and the Baroque Spectacle of the Restoration Theatre’. Shakespeare 9(2):168–86. doi: 10.1080/17450918.2013.784849.
Dobson, Michael. 1991. ‘“Remember/First to Possess His Books”: The Appropriation of The Tempest 1700-1800’. Pp. 99–108 in Shakespeare Survey 43, edited by S. Wells. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Donohue, Joseph W. 1970. Dramatic Character in the English Romantic Age. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Dutton, Richard. 2003. ‘King Lear’. Pp. 375–92 in A Companion to Shakespeare’s Works, Volume I: The Tragedies. Vol. Blackwell companions to literature and culture. Malden, Mass: Blackwell.
Dutton, Richard. 2006. ‘King Lear’. Pp. 375–92 in A Companion to Shakespeare’s Works - Volume 1: The Tragedies. Oxford: Blackwell.
Edwards, Philip. 1958. ‘Shakespeare’s Romances: 1900–1957’. Pp. 1–18 in Shakespeare Survey 11, edited by A. Nicoll. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Evans, Malcolm. 1986. ‘Extract’. Pp. 224–34 in Signifying Nothing: Truth’s True Contents in Shakespeare’s Text. Brighton: Harvester.
Everett, Barbara. 1960. ‘The New King Lear’. Critical Quarterly 2(4):325–39. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8705.1960.tb00882.x.
Faragher, John Mack. 2001. ‘The Historical Imagination of A Thousand Acres’. Pp. 146–59 in Novel History: Historians and Novelists Confront America’s Past (And Each Other).
Field, Alan Sin. 1982. ‘King Lear Versus Lear at Stratford’. Critical Quarterly 24(4):5–14. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8705.1982.tb01893.x.
Foakes, R. A. 1997. ‘Introduction’. Pp. 1–110 in King Lear. Vol. Arden Shakespeare.: Third series. Walton-on-Thames: Nelson.
Foakes, R. A. 2002. ‘King Lear and Endgame’. Pp. 153–58 in Shakespeare Survey 55, edited by P. Holland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fuller, John. 1970. ‘Extract’. Pp. 157–65 in A Reader’s Guide to W. H. Auden. London: Thames & Hudson Ltd.
Gillies, John. 1994. ‘Extract’. Pp. 140–55 in Shakespeare and the Geography of Difference. Vol. Cambridge studies in Renaissance literature and culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goldberg, Jonathan. 1993. ‘Perspectives: Dover Cliff and the Conditions of Representation’. Pp. 145–57 in King Lear, William Shakespeare. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Greenaway, Peter. 1991. Prospero’s Books: A Film of Shakespeare’s the Tempest. London: Chatto & Windus.
Greenaway, Peter, and William Shakespeare. 2010. ‘Prospero’s Books’.
Greenberg, Herbert. 1968. ‘Extract’. Pp. 122–41 in Quest for the Necessary: W. H. Auden and the Dilemma of Divided Consciousness. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Greenblatt, Stephen. 1988a. ‘Shakespeare and the Exorcists’. Pp. 94–128 in Shakespearean Negotiations: The Circulation of Social Energy in Renaissance England. Oxford: Clarendon.
Greenblatt, Stephen. 1988b. ‘Shakespeare and the Exorcists’. Pp. 94–128 in Shakespearean Negotiations: The Circulation of Social Energy in Renaissance England. University of California Press.
Greenblatt, Stephen. 1990a. ‘Learning to Curse: Aspects of Linguistic Colonialism in the Sixteenth Century’. Pp. 22–51 in Learning to Curse: Essays in Early Modern Culture. New York: Routledge.
Greenblatt, Stephen. 1990b. ‘Learning to Curse: Aspects of Linguistic Colonialism in the Sixteenth Century’. Pp. 22–51 in Learning to Curse: Essays in Early Modern Culture. New York: Routledge.
Greenblatt, Stephen J. 1988. ‘Martial Law in the Land of Cockaigne’. Pp. 129–63 in Shakespearean Negotiations: The Circulation of Social Energy in Renaissance England. Oxford: Clarendon.
Greenblatt, Stephen J. 1990. ‘The Cultivation of Anxiety: King Lear and His Heirs’. Pp. 80–98 in Learning to Curse: Essays in Early Modern Culture. New York: Routledge.
Gritzner, Karoline, and David Ian Rabey. 2006. Theatre of Catastrophe: New Essays on Howard Barker. London.
Hawkes, Terence. 1986. ‘Playhouse-Workhouse’. Pp. 1–26 in That Shakespearian Rag: Essays on a Critical Process. London: Methuen.
Hay, Malcolm, and Philip Roberts. 1980. Bond: A Study of His Plays. Vol. Modern theatre profiles. London: Methuen.
Hazlitt, William, and Arthur Quiller-Couch. 1939. ‘Lear’. in Characters of Shakespeare’s Plays. Vol. The world’s classics. London: Humphrey Milford.
Hibbard, G. R. 1981a. ‘King Lear: A Retrospect, 1939–79’. Pp. 1–12 in Shakespeare Survey 33, edited by K. Muir. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hibbard, G. R. 1981b. ‘King Lear: A Retrospect, 1939–79’. Pp. 1–12 in Shakespeare Survey 33, edited by K. Muir. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hirst, David L. 1985. Edward Bond. Vol. Macmillan modern dramatists. London: Macmillan.
Hodgdon, Barbara. 1977. ‘Kozintsev’s King Lear: Filming a Tragic Poem’. Literature/Film Quarterly 5(4):291–98.
Hodgdon, Barbara. 1983. ‘Two King Lears: Uncovering the Filmtext’. Literature/Film Quarterly 11(3):143–51.
Holderness, Graham. 1994. ‘Radical Potentiality and Institutional Closure: Shakespeare in Film and Television’. Pp. 206–25 in Political Shakespeare: Essays in Cultural Materialism. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Holland, Peter. 1994. ‘Two‑Dimensional Shakespeare: King Lear on Film’. Pp. 50–68 in Shakespeare and the Moving Image: The Plays on Film and Television. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Holland, Peter. 1995. ‘The Shapeliness of The Tempest’. Essays in Criticism XLV(3):208–29. doi: 10.1093/eic/XLV.3.208.
Hopkins, Lisa. 2008. Shakespeare’s the Tempest: The Relationship Between Text and Film. Vol. Screen adaptations. London: Methuen Drama.
Hughes, Ted. 1998a. ‘Freedom of Speech’. in Birthday Letters. London: Faber.
Hughes, Ted. 1998b. ‘Night-Ride on Ariel’. in Birthday Letters. London: Faber.
Hughes, Ted. 1998c. ‘Setebos’. in Birthday Letters. London: Faber.
Hughes, Ted. 1998d. ‘Setebos | Immrama’. Retrieved (http://immrama.blogspot.co.uk/2004/12/setebos-ted-hughes.html).
Hulme, Peter, and William H. Sherman. 2004. The Tempest: Sources and Contexts, Criticism, Rewritings and Appropriations. New York: W. W. Norton.
Hunter, G. K. 2005. ‘The Play in Performance’. in King Lear. London: Penguin.
Irvine, Lindesay. 2006. ‘Podcast: Howard Barker Talks | Stage’. The Guardian.
Johnson, Samuel. 1989. ‘Extract’. Pp. 166–69 in Samuel Johnson on Shakespeare. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Jorgens, Jack J. 1991a. ‘Chapter 10’. in Shakespeare on Film. Lanham, Md: University Press of America.
Jorgens, Jack J. 1991b. ‘Chapter 10’. in Shakespeare on Film. Lanham, Md: University Press of America.
Kahn, Coppélia. 1993. ‘The Absent Mother in King Lear’. Pp. 92–113 in King Lear, William Shakespeare. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Kay, Carol McGinnis. 1978. ‘An Overview of Critical Approaches to the Romances’. in Shakespeare’s Romances Reconsidered. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Keats, John. n.d. ‘On Sitting Down to Read King Lear Once Again | Poetry Foundation’. Retrieved (https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems-and-poets/poems/detail/44482).
Kennedy, Dennis. 1993. ‘Introduction: Shakespeare Without His Language’. Pp. 1–18 in Foreign Shakespeare: Contemporary Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kennedy, Dennis. 2001. ‘Shakespeare and the Visual’. in Looking at Shakespeare: A Visual History of Twentieth-Century Performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kermode, Frank. 1992a. ‘Part 1: Early Comments and Critiques’. Pp. 25–45 in Shakespeare, King Lear: A Casebook. Vol. Casebook series. Macmillan Education.
Kermode, Frank. 1992b. Shakespeare, King Lear: A Casebook. Vol. Casebook series. Rev. ed. Macmillan Educ.
Kettle, Arnold. 1964. ‘From Hamlet to Lear’. Pp. 146–71 in Shakespeare in a Changing World: Essays. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
Kirsch, Arthur. 2003. ‘Introduction and Commentary’. Pp. xi–xliii in The Sea and the Mirror: A Commentary on Shakespeare’s the Tempest. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Knight, G. Wilson. 1965. ‘The Shakespearian Superman: A Study of The Tempest’. Pp. 203–55 in The Crown of Life: Essays in Interpretation of Shakespeare’s Final Plays. Vol. University paperback. London: Methuen.
Knight, G. Wilson. 1989a. ‘King Lear and the Comedy of the Grotesque’. Pp. 201–34 in The Wheel of Fire: Interpretations of Shakespearean Tragedy, With Three New Essays. London: Routledge.
Knight, G. Wilson. 1989b. ‘The Lear Universe’. Pp. 181–200 in The Wheel of Fire: Interpretations of Shakespearean Tragedy, With Three New Essays. London: Routledge.
Knight, G. Wilson. 1989c. ‘The Lear Universe’. Pp. 201–34 in The Wheel of Fire: Interpretations of Shakespearian Tragedy. Vol. Routledge classics. London: Routledge.
Knight, G. Wilson. 1992. ‘King Lear and the Comedy of the Grotesque’. Pp. 107–22 in Shakespeare, King Lear: A Casebook. Vol. Casebook series. Macmillan Educ.
Knight, G. Wilson. 2001. ‘King Lear and the Comedy of the Grotesque’. Pp. 181–200 in The Wheel of Fire: Interpretations of Shakespearian Tragedy. London: Routledge.
Ko, Yu Jin. 2012a. ‘Shakespearean Characters and Early Modern Subjectivity: The Case of King Lear’. Pp. 35–52 in Shakespeare’s Sense of Character: On the Page and From the Stage. Vol. Studies in performance and early modern drama. Farnham, Surrey, England: Ashgate.
Ko, Yu Jin. 2012b. ‘Shakespearean Characters and Early Modern Subjectivity: The Case of King Lear’. Pp. 35–52 in Shakespeare’s Sense of Character: On the Page and From the Stage. Vol. Studies in performance and early modern drama. Farnham: Ashgate.
Kott, Jan. 1967a. ‘King Lear, or Endgame’. Pp. 100–133 in Shakespeare Our Contemporary. Vol. University paperbacks. London: Methuen.
Kott, Jan. 1967b. ‘King Lear, or Endgame’. Pp. 174–90 in Shakespeare: An Anthology of Criticism and Theory, 1945-2000. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub.
Kott, Jan. 1967c. ‘King Lear, or Endgame’. Pp. 100–133 in Shakespeare Our Contemporary. Vol. University paperbacks. London: Methuen.
Kott, Jan. 1967d. ‘King Lear, or Endgame’. Pp. 174–90 in Shakespeare: An Anthology of Criticism and Theory, 1945-2000. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub.
Kott, Jan. 1967e. ‘Prospero’s Staff’. in Shakespeare Our Contemporary. Vol. University paperbacks. London: Methuen.
Kozintsev, Grigori M., and Mary Mackintosh. 1977. ‘King Lear’, the Space of Tragedy: The Diary of a Film Director. London: Heinemann Educational.
Lamb, Charles. 2005. The Theatre of Howard Barker. Revised Edition. London: Routledge.
Linton, Joan Pong. 2006. ‘Kurosawa’s Ran (1985) and Shakespeare’s King Lear: Towards a Conversation on Historical Responsibility’’. Quarterly Review of Film and Video 23(4):341–51. doi: 10.1080/10509200690897608.
Magnusson, A. Lynne. 1986. ‘Interruption in “The Tempest”’. Shakespeare Quarterly 37(1):52–65. doi: 10.2307/2870191.
Malcolm, Janet. 1995. Silent Woman: Sylvia Plath and Ted Hughes. Papermac.
Marcus, Leah S. 1988. ‘Retrospective: King Lear on St Stephen’s Night, 1606’. Pp. 148–59 in Puzzling Shakespeare: Local Reading and Its Discontents. Vol. The new historicism. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Maus, Katharine Eisaman. 1982. ‘“Arcadia Host: Politics and Revision in the Restoration” Tempest’. Renaissance Drama 13:189–209.
McDonald, Russ. 1991. ‘Reading The Tempest’. Pp. 15–28 in Shakespeare Survey 43, edited by S. Wells. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McDonald, Russ. 2004a. Shakespeare: An Anthology of Criticism and Theory, 1945-2000. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub.
McDonald, Russ. 2004b. ‘The "New Criticism” and King Lear’. Pp. 63–88 in Shakespeare: An Anthology of Criticism and Theory, 1945-2000. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub.
McDowell, Frederick P. W. 1964. ‘The Sea and the Mirror’. in Auden: A Collection of Critical Essays. Vol. Twentieth century views. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
Moorhouse, Jocelyn. 2006. ‘A Thousand Acres’.
Neill, Michael. 2008. ‘“Noises, / Sounds, and Sweet Airs”: The Burden of Shakespeare’s “Tempest”’. Shakespeare Quarterly 59(1):36–59.
Nicholl, Allardyce. 1960. ‘Three Adaptations’. Pp. 137–45 in Shakespeare Survey 13, edited by A. Nicoll. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nodelman, Perry. 1980. ‘Beyond Politics in Bond’s Lear’. Modern Drama 23(3):269–76. doi: 10.1353/mdr.1980.0011.
Novy, Marianne. 1999a. ‘King Lear and A Thousand Acres: Gender, Genre and the Revisionary Impulse’. in Transforming Shakespeare: Twentieth-Century Women’s Re-Visions. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Novy, Marianne. 1999b. ‘The Polluted Quarry: Nature and Body in A Thousand Acres’. in Transforming Shakespeare: Twentieth-Century Women’s Re-Visions. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Orgel, Stephen. 1987. ‘Introduction’. in The Tempest. Oxford: Clarendon.
Palmer, D. J. 1967. ‘Introduction to The Tempest’. in Shakespeare, the Tempest: A Casebook. Vol. Casebook series. London: Macmillan.
Palmer, D. J. 1968a. ‘Extract’. Pp. 34–71 in Shakespeare, The Tempest: A Casebook. Vol. Casebook series. London: Macmillan.
Palmer, D. J. 1968b. ‘Shakespeare’s Dream’. Pp. 109–29 in Shakespeare, the Tempest: A Casebook. Vol. Casebook series. London: Macmillan.
Parker, G. F. 1989a. Johnson’s Shakespeare. Oxford: Clarendon.
Parker, G. F. 1989b. Johnson’s Shakespeare. Oxford: Clarendon.
Patterson, Annabell M. 1989. ‘"What Matter Who’s Speaking?”: Hamlet and King Lear’. Pp. 93–119 in Shakespeare and the Popular Voice.
Plath, Sylvia. 1965. Ariel. London: Faber.
Plath, Sylvia. 1967. ‘Full Fathom Five’. Pp. 46–47 in The Colossus. London: Faber.
Plath, Sylvia. n.d.-a. ‘Ariel | Poetry Foundation’. Retrieved (https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems-and-poets/poems/detail/49001).
Plath, Sylvia. n.d.-b. ‘Full Fathom Five | Digital-Shakespeare’. Retrieved (http://digital-shakespeare.angelfire.com/fullfathomplath.html).
Rabey, David Ian. 2008. Howard Baker: Ecstasy and Death: An Expository Study of His Plays and Production Work, 1988-2008. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Raleigh, Walter. 1907. ‘The Last Phase’. in Shakespeare. Vol. English men of letters. London: Macmillan.
Rose, Jacqueline. 1991. The Haunting of Sylvia Plath. London: Virago.
Ryan, Kiernan. 1999a. ‘Introduction’. Pp. 4–12 in Shakespeare: The Last Plays. Vol. Longman Critical Readers. Longman.
Ryan, Kiernan. 1999b. ‘Introduction’. Pp. 1–21 in Shakespeare: The Last Plays. Vol. Longman Critical Readers. Longman.
Ryan, Kiernan. 1999c. ‘"What Cares These Roarers for the Name of King?”: Language and Utopia in The Tempest’. Pp. 245–78 in Shakespeare: The Last Plays. Vol. Longman Critical Readers. Longman.
Ryan, Kiernan. 2002a. ‘The Tempest: The Complicities of Art’. in Shakespeare. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Ryan, Kiernan. 2002b. ‘The Tempest: The Complicities of Art’. in Shakespeare. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave.
Ryan, Kiernan. 2005. ‘Introduction’. Pp. xxi–lxiv in King Lear. Vol. Penguin Shakespeare. London: Penguin.
Sawyer, Robert. 1999a. ‘Remembering King Lear in Jane Smiley’s A Thousand Acres’. Pp. 85–102 in Shakespeare and Appropriation. Vol. Accents on Shakespeare. Routledge.
Sawyer, Robert. 1999b. ‘Remembering King Lear in Jane Smiley’s A Thousand Acres’. Pp. 85–102 in Shakespeare and Appropriation. London: Routledge.
Sawyer, Robert. 1999c. ‘The Shakespeareanization of Robert Browning’. Pp. 142–59 in Shakespeare and Appropriation. Vol. Accents on Shakespeare. Routledge.
Shakespeare, William. 1997. King Lear. Vol. Arden Shakespeare.: Third series. New Edition. edited by R. A. Foakes. Walton-on-Thames: Nelson.
Shakespeare, William, George Hunter, and Kiernan Ryan. 2005. ‘The Popular Voice of King Lear’. Pp. 130–44 in King Lear: Contemporary Critical Essays. Vol. Penguin Shakespeare. London: Penguin.
Shakespeare, William, Derek Jarman, and Heathcote Williams. 1979. ‘The Tempest’.
Shakespeare, William, and Stephen Orgel. 1987. The Tempest. Oxford: Clarendon.
Shakespeare, William, and Julie Taymor. 2010. ‘The Tempest | Box of Broadcasts’.
Shaughnessy, Robert. 1998. ‘A Post-National European Cinema: A Consideration of Derek Jarman’s The Tempest and Edward II’. Pp. 145–55 in Shakespeare on Film. Vol. New Casebooks. Macmillan.
Shaw, David. 1968. ‘Extract’. Pp. 193–203 in The Dialectical Temper: The Rhetorical Art of Robert Browning. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
Sibley-Esposito, Clare. 2011. ‘Becoming-Ariel: Viewing Julie Taymor’s The Tempest through an Ecocritical Lens’. Babel (24):121–34. doi: 10.4000/babel.156.
Sinfield, Alan. 1994. ‘The Patriarchal Bard: Feminist Criticism and Shakespeare: King Lear and Measure for Measure’. Pp. 88–108 in Political Shakespeare: Essays in Cultural Materialism. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Slinn, E. Warwick. 1982. ‘Extract’. Pp. 84–90 in Browning and the Fictions of Identity. London: Macmillan.
Smiley, Jane. 1992. A Thousand Acres. London: Flamingo.
Smith, Stan. 1985. ‘Extract’. Pp. 153–60 in W. H. Auden. Vol. Rereading literature. Oxford: Blackwell.
Sokolyansky, Mark. 2007a. ‘Grigori Kozintsev’s Hamlet and King Lear’. Pp. 203–15 in The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare on Film. Vol. Cambridge companions to literature The Cambridge companion to Shakespeare on film. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sokolyansky, Mark. 2007b. ‘Grigori Kozintsev’s Hamlet and King Lear’. Pp. 203–15 in The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare on Film. Vol. Cambridge Companions to Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Strachey, Lytton. 1922. ‘Shakespeare’s Final Period’. in Books and Characters: French and English. London: Chatto and Windus.
Taylor, Michael. 2001. Shakespeare Criticism in the Twentieth Century. Vol. Oxford Shakespeare Topics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Taymor, Julie, and William Shakespeare. 2010. The Tempest. New York: Abrams.
Thompson, Ann. 1988. King Lear. Vol. The critics debate. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Vickers, Brian. 1974a. Shakespeare, the Critical Heritage - Volume 1, 1623-1692. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Vickers, Brian. 1974b. Shakespeare, the Critical Heritage - Volume 2, 1693-1733. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Vickers, Brian. 1975. Shakespeare, the Critical Heritage - Volume 3, 1733-1752. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Vickers, Brian. 1976. Shakespeare, the Critical Heritage - Volume 4, 1753-1765. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Vickers, Brian. 1979. Shakespeare, the Critical Heritage - Volume 5, 1765-1774. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Vickers, Brian. 1981a. Shakespeare, the Critical Heritage - Volume 6, 1774-1801. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Vickers, Brian. 1981b. Shakespeare: The Critical Heritage 1623-1801. Vol. The Critical Heritage Series. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Wagner, Erica. 2001. Ariel’s Gift: Ted Hughes, Sylvia Plath and the Story of Birthday Letters. New York: Norton.
Wikander, Matthew H. 1991. ‘“The Duke My Father’s Wrack”: The Innocence of the Restoration Tempest’. Pp. 91–98 in Shakespeare Survey 43, edited by S. Wells. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wood, Nigel. 1995. ‘Political Criticism at the Crossroads: The Utopian Historicism’. Pp. 29–66 in The Tempest. Vol. Theory in practice series. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Woudhuysen, H. R. 1989. ‘Notes on King Lear’. Pp. 219–23 in Samuel Johnson on Shakespeare. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Yachnin, P. E. 2009. ‘The Properties of Character in King Lear’. Pp. 98–116 in Shakespeare and Character: Theory, History, Performance, and Theatrical Persons. Vol. Palgrave Shakespeare studies. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Zimmerman, Susan. 1998. ‘Perspectives: Dover Cliff and the  Conditions of Representation’. Pp. 155–66 in Shakespeare’s Tragedies. Vol. New casebooks. Basingstoke: Macmillan.