Adelman, Janet. 1992a. ‘Suffocating Mothers in King Lear’. In Suffocating Mothers: Fantasies of Maternal Origin in Shakespeare’s Plays, Hamlet to the Tempest, 103–29. New York: Routledge.
———. 1992b. ‘Suffocating Mothers in King Lear’. In Suffocating Mothers: Fantasies of Maternal Origin in Shakespeare’s Plays, Hamlet to the Tempest, 103–29. New York: Routledge. https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=3060994.
Auden, W. H. 1954. ‘Balaam and The Ass: On the Literary Use of the Master-Servant Relationship’. Encounter, no. July: 35–53. http://www.unz.org/Pub/Encounter-1954jul-00035.
———. 1963. ‘Balaam and His Ass: On the Literary Use of the Master-Servant Relationship’. In The Dyer’s Hand: And Other Essays, 107–45. London: Faber.
Badawī, Muḥammad Muṣṭafá. 1973a. Coleridge: Critic of Shakespeare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
———. 1973b. Coleridge: Critic of Shakespeare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Barker, Howard. 1993. Arguments for a Theatre. 2nd Edition. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
———. 2005a. Death, the One and the Art of Theatre. London: Routledge.
———. 2005b. Death, the One and the Art of Theatre. London: Routledge. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=199576.
———. 2007. A Style and Its Origins. London: Oberon Books.
———. 2009. ‘Seven Lears: The Pursuit of Good’. In Plays Five. London: Oberon Books.
Bate, Jonathan. 1986a. Shakespeare and the English Romantic Imagination. Oxford: Clarendon.
———. 1986b. Shakespeare and the English Romantic Imagination. Oxford: Clarendon.
———. 1989a. Shakespearean Constitutions: Politics, Theatre, Criticism, 1730-1830. Oxford: Clarendon.
———. 1989b. Shakespearean Constitutions: Politics, Theatre, Criticism, 1730-1830. Oxford: Clarendon.
———. 1992a. ‘Extract’. In The Romantics on Shakespeare, New Penguin Shakespeare library:60–66. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
———. 1992b. ‘King Lear’. In The Romantics on Shakespeare, New Penguin Shakespeare library:381–405. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
———. 1997. ‘The Original Genius’. In The Genius of Shakespeare. London: Picador.
———. 2016. ‘All the World His Stage’. In The Genius of Shakespeare, Picador Classic Edition, 217–50. London: Picador Classic.
Bayley, John. 1981. ‘The King’s Ship’. In Shakespeare and Tragedy, 7–48. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Beckett, Samuel, and S. E. Gontarski. 1992. Endgame. Vol. The theatrical notebooks of Samuel Beckett. London: Faber and Faber.
Berger, Harry. 1997a. ‘King Lear: The Lear Family Romance’. In Making Trifles of Terrors: Redistributing Complicities in Shakespeare. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press.
———. 1997b. ‘Text Against Performance:The Gloucester Family Romance’. In Making Trifles of Terrors: Redistributing Complicities in Shakespeare. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press.
Bloom, Harold. 1999. ‘King Lear’. In Shakespeare: The Invention of the Human, 476–515. London: Fourth Estate.
Bond, Edward. 1972a. ‘Drama and the Dialectic of Violence’. Theatre Quarterly 2 (5): 4–14.
———. 1972b. Lear. Edited by Patricia Hern. London: Bloomsbury. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781408162996.00000018.
———. 1974. Bingo: Scenes of Money and Death. Vol. Methuen’s modern plays. London: Methuen.
———. 1978. Plays: 2. London: Eyre Methuen.
———. 1987. Plays: 3. London: Methuen.
———. 2000a. The Hidden Plot: Notes on Theatre and the State. London: Methuen Drama.
———. 2000b. The Hidden Plot: Notes on Theatre and the State. London: Methuen Drama.
Boose, Lynda E. 1997a. ‘Shakespeare in the Age of Post-Mechanical Reproduction: Sexual and Electronic Magic in Prospero’s Books’. In Shakespeare, The Movie: Popularizing the Plays on Film, TV and Video, 172–89. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis. https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=240528.
———. 1997b. ‘Shakespeare in the Age of Post-Mechanical Reproduction: Sexual and Electronic Magic in Prospero’s Books’. In Shakespeare, the Movie: Popularizing the Plays on Film, TV and Video, 172–89. London: Routledge.
Booth, Stephen. 1983. ‘Extract’. In King Lear, Macbeth, Indefinition and Tragedy, 5–57. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Bradley, A. C. 2007a. ‘“Lecture VII: King Lear” and “Lecture VIII: King Lear”’. In Shakespearean Tragedy: Lectures on Hamlet, Othello, King Lear, Macbeth, 4th Edition, 182–210. Houndsmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
———. 2007b. ‘Lecture VIII: King Lear’. In Shakespearean Tragedy: Lectures on Hamlet, Othello, King Lear, Macbeth, 4th Edition, 211–51. Houndsmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Braudy, Leo. 2016. ‘Finding Shakespeare on Film: From an Interview with Peter Brook’. In Film Theory and Criticism: Introductory Readings, edited by Leo Braudy and Marshall Cohen, 8th Edition. New York: Oxford University Press.
Brauner, David. 2001. ‘“Speak Again”: The Politics of Rewriting in “A Thousand Acres”’. The Modern Language Review 96 (3): 654–66. https://doi.org/10.2307/3736736.
Brown, Paul. 1994. ‘This Thing of Darkness I Acknowledge Mine’. In Political Shakespeare: Essays in Cultural Materialism, 2nd Edition, 48–71. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Browning, Robert. n.d. ‘Caliban Upon Setebos | Poetry Foundation’. https://web.archive.org/web/20170407155817/https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems-and-poets/poems/detail/43748.
Buchanan, Judith. 2005a. ‘Historically Juxtaposed Beans (II): The Tempest on Film’. In Shakespeare on Film, Inside film:150–83. Harlow: Longman.
———. 2005b. ‘The Tempest on Film’. In Shakespeare on Film. Harlow, England: Pearson Longman. http://ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.myilibrary.com?id=177112.
Bulman, James C. 1996a. ‘Drowning the Book: Prospero’s Books and the Textual Shakespeare’. In Shakespeare, Theory, and Performance, 189–212. London: Routledge. https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=179529.
———. 1996b. ‘Drowning the Book: Prospero’s Books and the Textual Shakespeare’. In Shakespeare, Theory and Performance, 189–212. London: Routledge.
Cartelli, Thomas. 2002. ‘Shakespeare in Pain: Edward Bond’s Lear and the Ghosts of History’. In Shakespeare Survey 55, edited by Peter Holland, 159–69. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521815878.014.
Cartmell, Deborah. 2000. ‘Shakespeare, Film and Race: Screening Othello and The Tempest’. In Interpreting Shakespeare on Screen, 67–93. New York: St. Martin’s Press. https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/reader.action?docID=6234544&ppg=78.
Clark, Sandra. 1997. ‘The Tempest, or The Enchanted Island’. In Shakespeare Made Fit: Restoration Adaptations of Shakespeare, 79–185. London: Everyman.
Crowl, Samuel. 1994. ‘The Bow Is Bent and Drawn: Kurosawa’s Ran and the Shakespearean Arrow of Desire.’ Literature Film Quarterly 22 (2): 109–18. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43796627.
Davies, Anthony. 1994. ‘Kurosawa’s Shakespeare Films: Throne of Blood, The Bad Sleep Well and Ran’. In Shakespeare and the Moving Image: The Plays on Film and Television. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Desmet, Christy. 1999. ‘The Shakespeareanization of Robert Browning’. In Shakespeare and Appropriation, 142–59. London: Routledge. https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=169306.
DiPietro, Cary. 2013. ‘Seeing Places: The Tempest and the Baroque Spectacle of the Restoration Theatre’. Shakespeare 9 (2): 168–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450918.2013.784849.
Dobson, Michael. 1991. ‘“Remember/First to Possess His Books”: The Appropriation of The Tempest 1700-1800’. In Shakespeare Survey 43, edited by Stanley Wells, 99–108. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521395291.009.
Donohue, Joseph W. 1970. Dramatic Character in the English Romantic Age. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Dutton, Richard. 2003. ‘King Lear’. In A Companion to Shakespeare’s Works, Volume I: The Tragedies, Blackwell companions to literature and culture:375–92. Malden, Mass: Blackwell. https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=350884.
———. 2006. ‘King Lear’. In A Companion to Shakespeare’s Works - Volume 1: The Tragedies, 375–92. Oxford: Blackwell.
Edwards, Philip. 1958. ‘Shakespeare’s Romances: 1900–1957’. In Shakespeare Survey 11, edited by Allardyce Nicoll, 1–18. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521064244.001.
Evans, Malcolm. 1986. ‘Extract’. In Signifying Nothing: Truth’s True Contents in Shakespeare’s Text, 224–34. Brighton: Harvester.
Everett, Barbara. 1960. ‘The New King Lear’. Critical Quarterly 2 (4): 325–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8705.1960.tb00882.x.
Faragher, John Mack. 2001. ‘The Historical Imagination of A Thousand Acres’. In Novel History: Historians and Novelists Confront America’s Past (And Each Other), 146–59.
Field, Alan Sin. 1982. ‘King Lear Versus Lear at Stratford’. Critical Quarterly 24 (4): 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8705.1982.tb01893.x.
Foakes, R. A. 1997. ‘Introduction’. In King Lear, New Edition, Arden Shakespeare.: Third series:1–110. Walton-on-Thames: Nelson.
———. 2002. ‘King Lear and Endgame’. In Shakespeare Survey 55, edited by Peter Holland, 153–58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521815878.013.
Fuller, John. 1970. ‘Extract’. In A Reader’s Guide to W. H. Auden, 157–65. London: Thames & Hudson Ltd.
Gillies, John. 1994. ‘Extract’. In Shakespeare and the Geography of Difference, Cambridge studies in Renaissance literature and culture:140–55. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goldberg, Jonathan. 1993. ‘Perspectives: Dover Cliff and the Conditions of Representation’. In King Lear, William Shakespeare, 145–57. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Greenaway, Peter. 1991. Prospero’s Books: A Film of Shakespeare’s the Tempest. London: Chatto & Windus.
Greenaway, Peter, and William Shakespeare. 2010. ‘Prospero’s Books’. [Stockholm]: Atlantic Film.
Greenberg, Herbert. 1968. ‘Extract’. In Quest for the Necessary: W. H. Auden and the Dilemma of Divided Consciousness, 122–41. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Greenblatt, Stephen. 1988a. ‘Shakespeare and the Exorcists’. In Shakespearean Negotiations: The Circulation of Social Energy in Renaissance England, 94–128. Oxford: Clarendon.
———. 1988b. ‘Shakespeare and the Exorcists’. In Shakespearean Negotiations: The Circulation of Social Energy in Renaissance England, 94–128. University of California Press. https://hdl-handle-net.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/2027/heb09132.0001.001.
———. 1990a. ‘Learning to Curse: Aspects of Linguistic Colonialism in the Sixteenth Century’. In Learning to Curse: Essays in Early Modern Culture, 22–51. New York: Routledge.
———. 1990b. ‘Learning to Curse: Aspects of Linguistic Colonialism in the Sixteenth Century’. In Learning to Curse: Essays in Early Modern Culture, 22–51. New York: Routledge. https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=1020235.
Greenblatt, Stephen J. 1988. ‘Martial Law in the Land of Cockaigne’. In Shakespearean Negotiations: The Circulation of Social Energy in Renaissance England, 129–63. Oxford: Clarendon.
———. 1990. ‘The Cultivation of Anxiety: King Lear and His Heirs’. In Learning to Curse: Essays in Early Modern Culture, 80–98. New York: Routledge.
Gritzner, Karoline, and David Ian Rabey. 2006. Theatre of Catastrophe: New Essays on Howard Barker. London.
Hawkes, Terence. 1986. ‘Playhouse-Workhouse’. In That Shakespearian Rag: Essays on a Critical Process, 1–26. London: Methuen.
Hay, Malcolm, and Philip Roberts. 1980. Bond: A Study of His Plays. Vol. Modern theatre profiles. London: Methuen.
Hazlitt, William, and Arthur Quiller-Couch. 1939. ‘Lear’. In Characters of Shakespeare’s Plays. Vol. The world’s classics. London: Humphrey Milford.
Hibbard, G. R. 1981a. ‘King Lear: A Retrospect, 1939–79’. In Shakespeare Survey 33, edited by Kenneth Muir, 1–12. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL052123249X.001.
———. 1981b. ‘King Lear: A Retrospect, 1939–79’. In Shakespeare Survey 33, edited by Kenneth Muir, 1–12. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL052123249X.001.
Hirst, David L. 1985. Edward Bond. Vol. Macmillan modern dramatists. London: Macmillan.
Hodgdon, Barbara. 1977. ‘Kozintsev’s King Lear: Filming a Tragic Poem’. Literature/Film Quarterly 5 (4): 291–98. http://search.proquest.com/fiaf/docview/226982216/85C4A81B35A640C6PQ/5?accountid=11455.
———. 1983. ‘Two King Lears: Uncovering the Filmtext’. Literature/Film Quarterly 11 (3): 143–51. http://search.proquest.com/fiaf/docview/226985750/D5CF782E5FD7491CPQ/4?accountid=11455.
Holderness, Graham. 1994. ‘Radical Potentiality and Institutional Closure: Shakespeare in Film and Television’. In Political Shakespeare: Essays in Cultural Materialism, 206–25. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Holland, Peter. 1994. ‘Two‑Dimensional Shakespeare: King Lear on Film’. In Shakespeare and the Moving Image: The Plays on Film and Television, 50–68. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
———. 1995. ‘The Shapeliness of The Tempest’. Essays in Criticism XLV (3): 208–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/eic/XLV.3.208.
Hopkins, Lisa. 2008. Shakespeare’s the Tempest: The Relationship Between Text and Film. Vol. Screen adaptations. London: Methuen Drama.
Hughes, Ted. 1998a. ‘Freedom of Speech’. In Birthday Letters. London: Faber.
———. 1998b. ‘Night-Ride on Ariel’. In Birthday Letters. London: Faber.
———. 1998c. ‘Setebos’. In Birthday Letters. London: Faber.
———. 1998d. ‘Setebos | Immrama’. 1998. http://immrama.blogspot.co.uk/2004/12/setebos-ted-hughes.html.
Hulme, Peter, and William H. Sherman. 2004. The Tempest: Sources and Contexts, Criticism, Rewritings and Appropriations. New York: W. W. Norton.
Hunter, G.K. 2005. ‘The Play in Performance’. In King Lear. London: Penguin.
Irvine, Lindesay. 2006. ‘Podcast: Howard Barker Talks | Stage’. The Guardian, December. https://www.theguardian.com/stage/theatreblog/2006/dec/06/podcasthowardbarkertalks.
Johnson, Samuel. 1989. ‘Extract’. In Samuel Johnson on Shakespeare, 166–69. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Jorgens, Jack J. 1991a. ‘Chapter 10’. In Shakespeare on Film. Lanham, Md: University Press of America.
———. 1991b. ‘Chapter 10’. In Shakespeare on Film. Lanham, Md: University Press of America.
Kahn, Coppélia. 1993. ‘The Absent Mother in King Lear’. In King Lear, William Shakespeare, 92–113. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Kay, Carol McGinnis. 1978. ‘An Overview of Critical Approaches to the Romances’. In Shakespeare’s Romances Reconsidered. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Keats, John. n.d. ‘On Sitting Down to Read King Lear Once Again | Poetry Foundation’. https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems-and-poets/poems/detail/44482.
Kennedy, Dennis. 1993. ‘Introduction: Shakespeare Without His Language’. In Foreign Shakespeare: Contemporary Performance, 1–18. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
———. 2001. ‘Shakespeare and the Visual’. In Looking at Shakespeare: A Visual History of Twentieth-Century Performance, 2nd Edition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kermode, Frank. 1992a. ‘Part 1: Early Comments and Critiques’. In Shakespeare, King Lear: A Casebook, Revised Edition, Casebook series:25–45. Macmillan Education.
———. 1992b. Shakespeare, King Lear: A Casebook. Rev. ed. Vol. Casebook series. Macmillan Educ.
Kettle, Arnold. 1964. ‘From Hamlet to Lear’. In Shakespeare in a Changing World: Essays, 146–71. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
Kirsch, Arthur. 2003. ‘Introduction and Commentary’. In The Sea and the Mirror: A Commentary on Shakespeare’s the Tempest, xi–xliii. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Knight, G. Wilson. 1965. ‘The Shakespearian Superman: A Study of The Tempest’. In The Crown of Life: Essays in Interpretation of Shakespeare’s Final Plays, University paperback:203–55. London: Methuen.
———. 1989a. ‘King Lear and the Comedy of the Grotesque’. In The Wheel of Fire: Interpretations of Shakespearean Tragedy, With Three New Essays, 4th Revised and Enlarged Edition, 201–34. London: Routledge.
———. 1989b. ‘The Lear Universe’. In The Wheel of Fire: Interpretations of Shakespearean Tragedy, With Three New Essays, 4th Revised and Enlarged Edition, 181–200. London: Routledge.
———. 1989c. ‘The Lear Universe’. In The Wheel of Fire: Interpretations of Shakespearian Tragedy, Routledge classics:201–34. London: Routledge. https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=240630.
———. 1992. ‘King Lear and the Comedy of the Grotesque’. In Shakespeare, King Lear: A Casebook, Revised Edition, Casebook series:107–22. Macmillan Educ.
———. 2001. ‘King Lear and the Comedy of the Grotesque’. In The Wheel of Fire: Interpretations of Shakespearian Tragedy, 181–200. London: Routledge. https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=240630.
Ko, Yu Jin. 2012a. ‘Shakespearean Characters and Early Modern Subjectivity: The Case of King Lear’. In Shakespeare’s Sense of Character: On the Page and From the Stage, Studies in performance and early modern drama:35–52. Farnham, Surrey, England: Ashgate.
———. 2012b. ‘Shakespearean Characters and Early Modern Subjectivity: The Case of King Lear’. In Shakespeare’s Sense of Character: On the Page and From the Stage, Studies in performance and early modern drama:35–52. Farnham: Ashgate. https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=4470669.
Kott, Jan. 1967a. ‘King Lear, or Endgame’. In Shakespeare Our Contemporary, 2nd Revised Edition, University paperbacks:100–133. London: Methuen.
———. 1967b. ‘King Lear, or Endgame’. In Shakespeare: An Anthology of Criticism and Theory, 1945-2000, 174–90. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub.
———. 1967c. ‘King Lear, or Endgame’. In Shakespeare Our Contemporary, 2nd Revised Edition, University paperbacks:100–133. London: Methuen.
———. 1967d. ‘King Lear, or Endgame’. In Shakespeare: An Anthology of Criticism and Theory, 1945-2000, 174–90. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub.
———. 1967e. ‘Prospero’s Staff’. In Shakespeare Our Contemporary, 2nd Revised Edition. Vol. University paperbacks. London: Methuen.
Kozintsev, Grigori M., and Mary Mackintosh. 1977. ‘King Lear’, the Space of Tragedy: The Diary of a Film Director. London: Heinemann Educational.
Lamb, Charles. 2005. The Theatre of Howard Barker. Revised Edition. London: Routledge.
Linton, Joan Pong. 2006. ‘Kurosawa’s Ran (1985) and Shakespeare’s King Lear: Towards a Conversation on Historical Responsibility’’. Quarterly Review of Film and Video 23 (4): 341–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509200690897608.
Magnusson, A. Lynne. 1986. ‘Interruption in “The Tempest”’. Shakespeare Quarterly 37 (1): 52–65. https://doi.org/10.2307/2870191.
Malcolm, Janet. 1995. Silent Woman: Sylvia Plath and Ted Hughes. Papermac.
Marcus, Leah S. 1988. ‘Retrospective: King Lear on St Stephen’s Night, 1606’. In Puzzling Shakespeare: Local Reading and Its Discontents, The new historicism:148–59. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Maus, Katharine Eisaman. 1982. ‘“Arcadia Host: Politics and Revision in the Restoration” Tempest’. Renaissance Drama 13: 189–209. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43264634.
McDonald, Russ. 1991. ‘Reading The Tempest’. In Shakespeare Survey 43, edited by Stanley Wells, 15–28. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521395291.002.
———. 2004a. Shakespeare: An Anthology of Criticism and Theory, 1945-2000. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub.
———. 2004b. ‘The "New Criticism” and King Lear’. In Shakespeare: An Anthology of Criticism and Theory, 1945-2000, 63–88. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub.
McDowell, Frederick P. W. 1964. ‘The Sea and the Mirror’. In Auden: A Collection of Critical Essays. Vol. Twentieth century views. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
Moorhouse, Jocelyn. 2006. ‘A Thousand Acres’. Universal.
Neill, Michael. 2008. ‘“Noises, / Sounds, and Sweet Airs”: The Burden of Shakespeare’s “Tempest”’. Shakespeare Quarterly 59 (1): 36–59. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40210245.
Nicholl, Allardyce. 1960. ‘Three Adaptations’. In Shakespeare Survey 13, edited by Allardyce Nicoll, 137–45. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nodelman, Perry. 1980. ‘Beyond Politics in Bond’s Lear’. Modern Drama 23 (3): 269–76. https://doi.org/10.1353/mdr.1980.0011.
Novy, Marianne. 1999a. ‘King Lear and A Thousand Acres: Gender, Genre and the Revisionary Impulse’. In Transforming Shakespeare: Twentieth-Century Women’s Re-Visions. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
———. 1999b. ‘The Polluted Quarry: Nature and Body in A Thousand Acres’. In Transforming Shakespeare: Twentieth-Century Women’s Re-Visions. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Orgel, Stephen. 1987. ‘Introduction’. In The Tempest. Oxford: Clarendon. https://www-oxfordscholarlyeditions-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/display/10.1093/actrade/9780198129172.book.1/actrade-9780198129172-book-1.
Palmer, D. J. 1968a. ‘Extract’. In Shakespeare, The Tempest: A Casebook, Casebook series:34–71. London: Macmillan.
———. 1968b. ‘Shakespeare’s Dream’. In Shakespeare, the Tempest: A Casebook, Casebook series:109–29. London: Macmillan.
Palmer, D.J. 1967. ‘Introduction to The Tempest’. In Shakespeare, the Tempest: A Casebook. Vol. Casebook series. London: Macmillan.
Parker, G. F. 1989a. Johnson’s Shakespeare. Oxford: Clarendon.
———. 1989b. Johnson’s Shakespeare. Oxford: Clarendon.
Patterson, Annabell M. 1989. ‘"What Matter Who’s Speaking?”: Hamlet and King Lear’. In Shakespeare and the Popular Voice, 93–119.
Plath, Sylvia. 1965. Ariel. London: Faber.
———. 1967. ‘Full Fathom Five’. In The Colossus, 46–47. London: Faber.
———. n.d. ‘Ariel | Poetry Foundation’. https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems-and-poets/poems/detail/49001.
———. n.d. ‘Full Fathom Five | Digital-Shakespeare’. http://digital-shakespeare.angelfire.com/fullfathomplath.html.
Rabey, David Ian. 2008. Howard Baker: Ecstasy and Death: An Expository Study of His Plays and Production Work, 1988-2008. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Raleigh, Walter. 1907. ‘The Last Phase’. In Shakespeare. Vol. English men of letters. London: Macmillan.
Rose, Jacqueline. 1991. The Haunting of Sylvia Plath. London: Virago.
Ryan, Kiernan. 1999a. ‘Introduction’. In Shakespeare: The Last Plays, Longman Critical Readers:4–12. Longman.
———. 1999b. ‘Introduction’. In Shakespeare: The Last Plays, Longman Critical Readers:1–21. Longman.
———. 1999c. ‘"What Cares These Roarers for the Name of King?”: Language and Utopia in The Tempest’. In Shakespeare: The Last Plays, Longman Critical Readers:245–78. Longman. https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=1710649.
———. 2002a. ‘The Tempest: The Complicities of Art’. In Shakespeare, 3rd Edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
———. 2002b. ‘The Tempest: The Complicities of Art’. In Shakespeare. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave. https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=5297581.
———. 2005. ‘Introduction’. In King Lear, Penguin Shakespeare:xxi–lxiv. London: Penguin.
Sawyer, Robert. 1999a. ‘Remembering King Lear in Jane Smiley’s A Thousand Acres’. In Shakespeare and Appropriation, Accents on Shakespeare:85–102. Routledge.
———. 1999b. ‘Remembering King Lear in Jane Smiley’s A Thousand Acres’. In Shakespeare and Appropriation, 85–102. London: Routledge. https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=169306.
———. 1999c. ‘The Shakespeareanization of Robert Browning’. In Shakespeare and Appropriation, Accents on Shakespeare:142–59. Routledge.
Shakespeare, William. 1997. King Lear. Edited by R. A. Foakes. New Edition. Vol. Arden Shakespeare.: Third series. Walton-on-Thames: Nelson.
Shakespeare, William, George Hunter, and Kiernan Ryan. 2005. ‘The Popular Voice of King Lear’. In King Lear: Contemporary Critical Essays, Penguin Shakespeare:130–44. London: Penguin.
Shakespeare, William, Derek Jarman, and Heathcote Williams. 1979. ‘The Tempest’. Second Sight.
Shakespeare, William, and Stephen Orgel. 1987. The Tempest. Oxford: Clarendon. https://www-oxfordscholarlyeditions-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/display/10.1093/actrade/9780198129172.book.1/actrade-9780198129172-book-1.
Shakespeare, William, and Julie Taymor. 2010. ‘The Tempest | Box of Broadcasts’. https://learningonscreen.ac.uk/ondemand/index.php/prog/05A9694D?bcast=123986425.
Shaughnessy, Robert. 1998. ‘A Post-National European Cinema: A Consideration of Derek Jarman’s The Tempest and Edward II’. In Shakespeare on Film, New Casebooks:145–55. Macmillan.
Shaw, David. 1968. ‘Extract’. In The Dialectical Temper: The Rhetorical Art of Robert Browning, 193–203. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
Sibley-Esposito, Clare. 2011. ‘Becoming-Ariel: Viewing Julie Taymor’s The Tempest through an Ecocritical Lens’. Babel, no. 24: 121–34. https://doi.org/10.4000/babel.156.
Sinfield, Alan. 1994. ‘The Patriarchal Bard: Feminist Criticism and Shakespeare: King Lear and Measure for Measure’. In Political Shakespeare: Essays in Cultural Materialism, 2nd Edition, 88–108. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Slinn, E. Warwick. 1982. ‘Extract’. In Browning and the Fictions of Identity, 84–90. London: Macmillan.
Smiley, Jane. 1992. A Thousand Acres. London: Flamingo.
Smith, Stan. 1985. ‘Extract’. In W. H. Auden, Rereading literature:153–60. Oxford: Blackwell.
Sokolyansky, Mark. 2007a. ‘Grigori Kozintsev’s Hamlet and King Lear’. In The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare on Film, 2nd Edition, Cambridge companions to literature The Cambridge companion to Shakespeare on film:203–15. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
———. 2007b. ‘Grigori Kozintsev’s Hamlet and King Lear’. In The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare on Film, Cambridge Companions to Literature:203–15. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521866006.
Strachey, Lytton. 1922. ‘Shakespeare’s Final Period’. In Books and Characters: French and English. London: Chatto and Windus.
Taylor, Michael. 2001. Shakespeare Criticism in the Twentieth Century. Vol. Oxford Shakespeare Topics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Taymor, Julie, and William Shakespeare. 2010. The Tempest. New York: Abrams.
Thompson, Ann. 1988. King Lear. Vol. The critics debate. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Vickers, Brian. 1974a. Shakespeare, the Critical Heritage - Volume 1, 1623-1692. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
———. 1974b. Shakespeare, the Critical Heritage - Volume 2, 1693-1733. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
———. 1975. Shakespeare, the Critical Heritage - Volume 3, 1733-1752. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
———. 1976. Shakespeare, the Critical Heritage - Volume 4, 1753-1765. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
———. 1979. Shakespeare, the Critical Heritage - Volume 5, 1765-1774. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
———. 1981a. Shakespeare, the Critical Heritage - Volume 6, 1774-1801. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
———. 1981b. Shakespeare: The Critical Heritage 1623-1801. Vol. The Critical Heritage Series. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Wagner, Erica. 2001. Ariel’s Gift: Ted Hughes, Sylvia Plath and the Story of Birthday Letters. New York: Norton.
Wikander, Matthew H. 1991. ‘“The Duke My Father’s Wrack”: The Innocence of the Restoration Tempest’. In Shakespeare Survey 43, edited by Stanley Wells, 91–98. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521395291.008.
Wood, Nigel. 1995. ‘Political Criticism at the Crossroads: The Utopian Historicism’. In The Tempest, Theory in practice series:29–66. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Woudhuysen, H.R. 1989. ‘Notes on King Lear’. In Samuel Johnson on Shakespeare, 219–23. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Yachnin, P. E. 2009. ‘The Properties of Character in King Lear’. In Shakespeare and Character: Theory, History, Performance, and Theatrical Persons, Palgrave Shakespeare studies:98–116. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Zimmerman, Susan. 1998. ‘Perspectives: Dover Cliff and the  Conditions of Representation’. In Shakespeare’s Tragedies, New casebooks:155–66. Basingstoke: Macmillan.