1.
Shakespeare W. King Lear. Vol Arden Shakespeare.: Third series. New Edition. (Foakes RA, ed.). Nelson; 1997.
2.
Ryan K. Introduction. In: King Lear. Vol Penguin Shakespeare. Penguin; 2005:xxi-lxiv.
3.
Hunter GK. The Play in Performance. In: King Lear. Penguin; 2005.
4.
Foakes RA. Introduction. In: King Lear. Vol Arden Shakespeare.: Third series. New Edition. Nelson; 1997:1-110.
5.
Bloom H. King Lear. In: Shakespeare: The Invention of the Human. Fourth Estate; 1999:476-515.
6.
Bayley J. The King’s Ship. In: Shakespeare and Tragedy. Routledge & Kegan Paul; 1981:7-48.
7.
Booth S. Extract. In: King Lear, Macbeth, Indefinition and Tragedy. Yale University Press; 1983:5-57.
8.
Berger H. King Lear: The Lear Family Romance. In: Making Trifles of Terrors: Redistributing Complicities in Shakespeare. Stanford University Press; 1997.
9.
Berger H. Text Against Performance:The Gloucester Family Romance. In: Making Trifles of Terrors: Redistributing Complicities in Shakespeare. Stanford University Press; 1997.
10.
Woudhuysen HR. Notes on King Lear. In: Samuel Johnson on Shakespeare. Penguin; 1989:219-223.
11.
Bate J. King Lear. In: The Romantics on Shakespeare. Vol New Penguin Shakespeare library. Penguin; 1992:381-405.
12.
Hazlitt W, Quiller-Couch A. Lear. In: Characters of Shakespeare’s Plays. Vol The world’s classics. Humphrey Milford; 1939.
13.
Keats J. On Sitting Down to Read King Lear Once Again | Poetry Foundation. https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems-and-poets/poems/detail/44482
14.
Kermode F. Part 1: Early Comments and Critiques. In: Shakespeare, King Lear: A Casebook. Vol Casebook series. Revised Edition. Macmillan Education; 1992:25-45.
15.
Parker GF. Johnson’s Shakespeare. Clarendon; 1989.
16.
Bate J. The Original Genius. In: The Genius of Shakespeare. Picador; 1997.
17.
Bate J. All the World His Stage. In: The Genius of Shakespeare. Picador Classic Edition. Picador Classic; 2016:217-250.
18.
Bate J. Shakespeare and the English Romantic Imagination. Clarendon; 1986.
19.
Bate J. Shakespearean Constitutions: Politics, Theatre, Criticism, 1730-1830. Clarendon; 1989.
20.
Badawī MM. Coleridge: Critic of Shakespeare. Cambridge University Press; 1973.
21.
Vickers B. Shakespeare: The Critical Heritage 1623-1801. Vol The Critical Heritage Series. Routledge & Kegan Paul; 1981.
22.
Bradley AC. ‘Lecture VII: King Lear’ and ‘Lecture VIII: King Lear’. In: Shakespearean Tragedy: Lectures on Hamlet, Othello, King Lear, Macbeth. 4th Edition. Palgrave Macmillan; 2007:182-210.
23.
Bradley AC. Lecture VIII: King Lear. In: Shakespearean Tragedy: Lectures on Hamlet, Othello, King Lear, Macbeth. 4th Edition. Palgrave Macmillan; 2007:211-251.
24.
Kermode F. Shakespeare, King Lear: A Casebook. Vol Casebook series. Rev. ed. Macmillan Educ; 1992.
25.
Knight GW. King Lear and the Comedy of the Grotesque. In: The Wheel of Fire: Interpretations of Shakespearean Tragedy, With Three New Essays. 4th Revised and Enlarged Edition. Routledge; 1989:201-234.
26.
Knight GW. King Lear and the Comedy of the Grotesque. In: The Wheel of Fire: Interpretations of Shakespearian Tragedy. Routledge; 2001:181-200. https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=240630
27.
Knight GW. The Lear Universe. In: The Wheel of Fire: Interpretations of Shakespearean Tragedy, With Three New Essays. 4th Revised and Enlarged Edition. Routledge; 1989:181-200.
28.
Knight GW. The Lear Universe. In: The Wheel of Fire: Interpretations of Shakespearian Tragedy. Vol Routledge classics. Routledge; 1989:201-234. https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=240630
29.
Knight GW. King Lear and the Comedy of the Grotesque. In: Shakespeare, King Lear: A Casebook. Vol Casebook series. Revised Edition. Macmillan Educ; 1992:107-122.
30.
Kott J. King Lear, or Endgame. In: Shakespeare Our Contemporary. Vol University paperbacks. 2nd Revised Edition. Methuen; 1967:100-133.
31.
Kott J. King Lear, or Endgame. In: Shakespeare: An Anthology of Criticism and Theory, 1945-2000. Blackwell Pub; 1967:174-190.
32.
Kettle A. From Hamlet to Lear. In: Shakespeare in a Changing World: Essays. Lawrence & Wishart; 1964:146-171.
33.
McDonald R. Shakespeare: An Anthology of Criticism and Theory, 1945-2000. Blackwell Pub; 2004.
34.
Hibbard GR. King Lear: A Retrospect, 1939–79. In: Muir K, ed. Shakespeare Survey 33. Cambridge University Press; 1981:1-12. doi:10.1017/CCOL052123249X.001
35.
Thompson A. King Lear. Vol The critics debate. Macmillan; 1988.
36.
McDonald R. The "New Criticism” and King Lear. In: Shakespeare: An Anthology of Criticism and Theory, 1945-2000. Blackwell Pub; 2004:63-88.
37.
Everett B. The New King Lear. Critical Quarterly. 1960;2(4):325-339. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8705.1960.tb00882.x
38.
Beckett S, Gontarski SE. Endgame. Vol The theatrical notebooks of Samuel Beckett. Faber and Faber; 1992.
39.
Foakes RA. King Lear and Endgame. In: Holland P, ed. Shakespeare Survey 55. Cambridge University Press; 2002:153-158. doi:10.1017/CCOL0521815878.013
40.
Taylor M. Shakespeare Criticism in the Twentieth Century. Vol Oxford Shakespeare Topics. Oxford University Press; 2001.
41.
Greenblatt S. Shakespeare and the Exorcists. In: Shakespearean Negotiations: The Circulation of Social Energy in Renaissance England. Clarendon; 1988:94-128.
42.
Greenblatt S. Shakespeare and the Exorcists. In: Shakespearean Negotiations: The Circulation of Social Energy in Renaissance England. University of California Press; 1988:94-128. https://hdl-handle-net.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/2027/heb09132.0001.001
43.
Kahn C. The Absent Mother in King Lear. In: King Lear, William Shakespeare. Macmillan; 1993:92-113.
44.
Goldberg J. Perspectives: Dover Cliff and the Conditions of Representation. In: King Lear, William Shakespeare. Macmillan; 1993:145-157.
45.
Zimmerman S. Perspectives: Dover Cliff and the  Conditions of Representation. In: Shakespeare’s Tragedies. Vol New casebooks. Macmillan; 1998:155-166.
46.
Dutton R. King Lear. In: A Companion to Shakespeare’s Works - Volume 1: The Tragedies. Blackwell; 2006:375-392.
47.
Dutton R. King Lear. In: A Companion to Shakespeare’s Works, Volume I: The Tragedies. Vol Blackwell companions to literature and culture. Blackwell; 2003:375-392. https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=350884
48.
Hibbard GR. King Lear: A Retrospect, 1939–79. In: Muir K, ed. Shakespeare Survey 33. Cambridge University Press; 1981:1-12. doi:10.1017/CCOL052123249X.001
49.
Patterson AM. "What Matter Who’s Speaking?”: Hamlet and King Lear. In: Shakespeare and the Popular Voice. ; 1989:93-119.
50.
Shakespeare W, Hunter G, Ryan K. The Popular Voice of King Lear. In: King Lear: Contemporary Critical Essays. Vol Penguin Shakespeare. Penguin; 2005:130-144.
51.
Adelman J. Suffocating Mothers in King Lear. In: Suffocating Mothers: Fantasies of Maternal Origin in Shakespeare’s Plays, Hamlet to the Tempest. Routledge; 1992:103-129.
52.
Adelman J. Suffocating Mothers in King Lear. In: Suffocating Mothers: Fantasies of Maternal Origin in Shakespeare’s Plays, Hamlet to the Tempest. Routledge; 1992:103-129. https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=3060994
53.
Greenblatt SJ. The Cultivation of Anxiety: King Lear and His Heirs. In: Learning to Curse: Essays in Early Modern Culture. Routledge; 1990:80-98.
54.
Evans M. Extract. In: Signifying Nothing: Truth’s True Contents in Shakespeare’s Text. Harvester; 1986:224-234.
55.
Marcus LS. Retrospective: King Lear on St Stephen’s Night, 1606. In: Puzzling Shakespeare: Local Reading and Its Discontents. Vol The new historicism. University of California Press; 1988:148-159.
56.
Sinfield A. The Patriarchal Bard: Feminist Criticism and Shakespeare: King Lear and Measure for Measure. In: Political Shakespeare: Essays in Cultural Materialism. 2nd Edition. Manchester University Press; 1994:88-108.
57.
Yachnin PE. The Properties of Character in King Lear. In: Shakespeare and Character: Theory, History, Performance, and Theatrical Persons. Vol Palgrave Shakespeare studies. Palgrave Macmillan; 2009:98-116.
58.
Ko YJ. Shakespearean Characters and Early Modern Subjectivity: The Case of King Lear. In: Shakespeare’s Sense of Character: On the Page and From the Stage. Vol Studies in performance and early modern drama. Ashgate; 2012:35-52.
59.
Ko YJ. Shakespearean Characters and Early Modern Subjectivity: The Case of King Lear. In: Shakespeare’s Sense of Character: On the Page and From the Stage. Vol Studies in performance and early modern drama. Ashgate; 2012:35-52. https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=4470669
60.
Bond E. Lear. (Hern P, ed.). Bloomsbury; 1972. doi:10.5040/9781408162996.00000018
61.
Bond E. Plays: 2. Eyre Methuen; 1978.
62.
Cartelli T. Shakespeare in Pain: Edward Bond’s Lear and the Ghosts of History. In: Holland P, ed. Shakespeare Survey 55. Cambridge University Press; 2002:159-169. doi:10.1017/CCOL0521815878.014
63.
Field AS. King Lear Versus Lear at Stratford. Critical Quarterly. 1982;24(4):5-14. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8705.1982.tb01893.x
64.
Bond E. Drama and the Dialectic of Violence. Theatre Quarterly. 1972;2(5):4-14.
65.
Nodelman P. Beyond Politics in Bond’s Lear. Modern Drama. 1980;23(3):269-276. doi:10.1353/mdr.1980.0011
66.
Bond E. Bingo: Scenes of Money and Death. Vol Methuen’s modern plays. Methuen; 1974.
67.
Bond E. Plays: 3. Methuen; 1987.
68.
Bond E. The Hidden Plot: Notes on Theatre and the State. Methuen Drama; 2000.
69.
Bond E. The Hidden Plot: Notes on Theatre and the State. Methuen Drama; 2000.
70.
Hay M, Roberts P. Bond: A Study of His Plays. Vol Modern theatre profiles. Methuen; 1980.
71.
Hirst DL. Edward Bond. Vol Macmillan modern dramatists. Macmillan; 1985.
72.
Barker H. Seven Lears: The Pursuit of Good. In: Plays Five. Oberon Books; 2009.
73.
Barker H. Arguments for a Theatre. 2nd Edition. Manchester University Press; 1993.
74.
Barker H. A Style and Its Origins. Oberon Books; 2007.
75.
Rabey DI. Howard Baker: Ecstasy and Death: An Expository Study of His Plays and Production Work, 1988-2008. Palgrave Macmillan; 2008.
76.
Barker H. Death, the One and the Art of Theatre. Routledge; 2005.
77.
Barker H. Death, the One and the Art of Theatre. Routledge; 2005. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=199576
78.
Lamb C. The Theatre of Howard Barker. Revised Edition. Routledge; 2005.
79.
Gritzner K, Rabey DI. Theatre of Catastrophe: New Essays on Howard Barker. London; 2006.
80.
Irvine L. Podcast: Howard Barker talks | Stage. The Guardian. Published online 6 December 2006. https://www.theguardian.com/stage/theatreblog/2006/dec/06/podcasthowardbarkertalks
81.
Smiley J. A Thousand Acres. Flamingo; 1992.
82.
Brauner D. ‘Speak Again’: The Politics of Rewriting in ‘A Thousand Acres’. The Modern Language Review. 2001;96(3):654-666. doi:10.2307/3736736
83.
Sawyer R. Remembering King Lear in Jane Smiley’s A Thousand Acres. In: Shakespeare and Appropriation. Vol Accents on Shakespeare. Routledge; 1999:85-102.
84.
Sawyer R. Remembering King Lear in Jane Smiley’s A Thousand Acres. In: Shakespeare and Appropriation. Routledge; 1999:85-102. https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=169306
85.
Novy M. King Lear and A Thousand Acres: Gender, Genre and the Revisionary Impulse. In: Transforming Shakespeare: Twentieth-Century Women’s Re-Visions. Macmillan; 1999.
86.
Novy M. The Polluted Quarry: Nature and Body in A Thousand Acres. In: Transforming Shakespeare: Twentieth-Century Women’s Re-Visions. Macmillan; 1999.
87.
Faragher JM. The Historical Imagination of A Thousand Acres. In: Novel History: Historians and Novelists Confront America’s Past (And Each Other). ; 2001:146-159.
88.
Moorhouse J. A Thousand Acres. Published online 2006.
89.
Kott J. King Lear, or Endgame. In: Shakespeare Our Contemporary. Vol University paperbacks. 2nd Revised Edition. Methuen; 1967:100-133.
90.
Kott J. King Lear, or Endgame. In: Shakespeare: An Anthology of Criticism and Theory, 1945-2000. Blackwell Pub; 1967:174-190.
91.
Holland P. Two‑Dimensional Shakespeare: King Lear on Film. In: Shakespeare and the Moving Image: The Plays on Film and Television. Cambridge University Press; 1994:50-68.
92.
Hodgdon B. Two King Lears: Uncovering the Filmtext. Literature/Film Quarterly. 1983;11(3):143-151. http://search.proquest.com/fiaf/docview/226985750/D5CF782E5FD7491CPQ/4?accountid=11455
93.
Sokolyansky M. Grigori Kozintsev’s Hamlet and King Lear. In: The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare on Film. Vol Cambridge companions to literature The Cambridge companion to Shakespeare on film. 2nd Edition. Cambridge University Press; 2007:203-215.
94.
Sokolyansky M. Grigori Kozintsev’s Hamlet and King Lear. In: The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare on Film. Vol Cambridge Companions to Literature. Cambridge University Press; 2007:203-215. http://ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521866006
95.
Hodgdon B. Kozintsev’s King Lear: Filming a Tragic Poem. Literature/Film Quarterly. 1977;5(4):291-298. http://search.proquest.com/fiaf/docview/226982216/85C4A81B35A640C6PQ/5?accountid=11455
96.
Braudy L. Finding Shakespeare on Film: From an Interview with Peter Brook. In: Braudy L, Cohen M, eds. Film Theory and Criticism: Introductory Readings. 8th Edition. Oxford University Press; 2016.
97.
Jorgens JJ. Chapter 10. In: Shakespeare on Film. University Press of America; 1991.
98.
Kozintsev GM, Mackintosh M. ‘King Lear’, the Space of Tragedy: The Diary of a Film Director. Heinemann Educational; 1977.
99.
Kennedy D. Introduction: Shakespeare Without His Language. In: Foreign Shakespeare: Contemporary Performance. Cambridge University Press; 1993:1-18.
100.
Davies A. Kurosawa’s Shakespeare Films: Throne of Blood, The Bad Sleep Well and Ran. In: Shakespeare and the Moving Image: The Plays on Film and Television. Cambridge University Press; 1994.
101.
Linton JP. Kurosawa’s Ran (1985) and Shakespeare’s King Lear: Towards a Conversation on Historical Responsibility’. Quarterly Review of Film and Video. 2006;23(4):341-351. doi:10.1080/10509200690897608
102.
Crowl S. The Bow Is Bent and Drawn: Kurosawa’s Ran and the Shakespearean Arrow of Desire. Literature Film Quarterly. 1994;22(2):109-118. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43796627
103.
Jorgens JJ. Chapter 10. In: Shakespeare on Film. University Press of America; 1991.
104.
Kennedy D. Shakespeare and the Visual. In: Looking at Shakespeare: A Visual History of Twentieth-Century Performance. 2nd Edition. Cambridge University Press; 2001.
105.
Shakespeare W, Orgel S. The Tempest. Clarendon; 1987. https://www-oxfordscholarlyeditions-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/display/10.1093/actrade/9780198129172.book.1/actrade-9780198129172-book-1
106.
Hulme P, Sherman WH. The Tempest: Sources and Contexts, Criticism, Rewritings and Appropriations. W. W. Norton; 2004.
107.
Orgel S. Introduction. In: The Tempest. Clarendon; 1987. https://www-oxfordscholarlyeditions-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/display/10.1093/actrade/9780198129172.book.1/actrade-9780198129172-book-1
108.
McDonald R. Reading The Tempest. In: Wells S, ed. Shakespeare Survey 43. Cambridge University Press; 1991:15-28. doi:10.1017/CCOL0521395291.002
109.
Holland P. The Shapeliness of The Tempest. Essays in Criticism. 1995;XLV(3):208-229. doi:10.1093/eic/XLV.3.208
110.
Neill M. ‘Noises, / Sounds, and Sweet Airs’: The Burden of Shakespeare’s ‘Tempest’. Shakespeare Quarterly. 2008;59(1):36-59. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40210245
111.
Magnusson AL. Interruption in ‘The Tempest’. Shakespeare Quarterly. 1986;37(1):52-65. doi:10.2307/2870191
112.
Kott J. Prospero’s Staff. In: Shakespeare Our Contemporary. Vol University paperbacks. 2nd Revised Edition. Methuen; 1967.
113.
Ryan K. The Tempest: The Complicities of Art. In: Shakespeare. 3rd Edition. Palgrave; 2002.
114.
Ryan K. The Tempest: The Complicities of Art. In: Shakespeare. Palgrave; 2002. https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=5297581
115.
Palmer DJ. Extract. In: Shakespeare, The Tempest: A Casebook. Vol Casebook series. Macmillan; 1968:34-71.
116.
Johnson S. Extract. In: Samuel Johnson on Shakespeare. Penguin; 1989:166-169.
117.
Bate J. Extract. In: The Romantics on Shakespeare. Vol New Penguin Shakespeare library. Penguin; 1992:60-66.
118.
Parker GF. Johnson’s Shakespeare. Clarendon; 1989.
119.
Donohue JW. Dramatic Character in the English Romantic Age. Princeton University Press; 1970.
120.
Badawī MM. Coleridge: Critic of Shakespeare. Cambridge University Press; 1973.
121.
Bate J. Shakespeare and the English Romantic Imagination. Clarendon; 1986.
122.
Bate J. Shakespearean Constitutions: Politics, Theatre, Criticism, 1730-1830. Clarendon; 1989.
123.
Vickers B. Shakespeare, the Critical Heritage - Volume 1, 1623-1692. Routledge and Kegan Paul; 1974.
124.
Vickers B. Shakespeare, the Critical Heritage - Volume 2, 1693-1733. Routledge and Kegan Paul; 1974.
125.
Vickers B. Shakespeare, the Critical Heritage - Volume 3, 1733-1752. Routledge and Kegan Paul; 1975.
126.
Vickers B. Shakespeare, the Critical Heritage - Volume 4, 1753-1765. Routledge and Kegan Paul; 1976.
127.
Vickers B. Shakespeare, the Critical Heritage - Volume 5, 1765-1774. Routledge and Kegan Paul; 1979.
128.
Vickers B. Shakespeare, the Critical Heritage - Volume 6, 1774-1801. Routledge and Kegan Paul; 1981.
129.
Palmer DJ. Introduction to The Tempest. In: Shakespeare, the Tempest: A Casebook. Vol Casebook series. Macmillan; 1967.
130.
Palmer DJ. Shakespeare’s Dream. In: Shakespeare, the Tempest: A Casebook. Vol Casebook series. Macmillan; 1968:109-129.
131.
Knight GW. The Shakespearian Superman: A Study of The Tempest. In: The Crown of Life: Essays in Interpretation of Shakespeare’s Final Plays. Vol University paperback. Methuen; 1965:203-255.
132.
Edwards P. Shakespeare’s Romances: 1900–1957. In: Nicoll A, ed. Shakespeare Survey 11. Cambridge University Press; 1958:1-18. doi:10.1017/CCOL0521064244.001
133.
Ryan K. Introduction. In: Shakespeare: The Last Plays. Vol Longman Critical Readers. Longman; 1999:4-12.
134.
Kay CM. An Overview of Critical Approaches to the Romances. In: Shakespeare’s Romances Reconsidered. University of Nebraska Press; 1978.
135.
Strachey L. Shakespeare’s Final Period. In: Books and Characters: French and English. Chatto and Windus; 1922.
136.
Raleigh W. The Last Phase. In: Shakespeare. Vol English men of letters. Macmillan; 1907.
137.
Greenblatt SJ. Martial Law in the Land of Cockaigne. In: Shakespearean Negotiations: The Circulation of Social Energy in Renaissance England. Clarendon; 1988:129-163.
138.
Wood N. Political Criticism at the Crossroads: The Utopian Historicism. In: The Tempest. Vol Theory in practice series. Open University Press; 1995:29-66.
139.
Brown P. This Thing of Darkness I Acknowledge Mine. In: Political Shakespeare: Essays in Cultural Materialism. 2nd Edition. Manchester University Press; 1994:48-71.
140.
Ryan K. Introduction. In: Shakespeare: The Last Plays. Vol Longman Critical Readers. Longman; 1999:1-21.
141.
Ryan K. "What Cares These Roarers for the Name of King?”: Language and Utopia in The Tempest. In: Shakespeare: The Last Plays. Vol Longman Critical Readers. Longman; 1999:245-278. https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=1710649
142.
Hawkes T. Playhouse-Workhouse. In: That Shakespearian Rag: Essays on a Critical Process. Methuen; 1986:1-26.
143.
Gillies J. Extract. In: Shakespeare and the Geography of Difference. Vol Cambridge studies in Renaissance literature and culture. Cambridge University Press; 1994:140-155.
144.
Greenblatt S. Learning to Curse: Aspects of Linguistic Colonialism in the Sixteenth Century. In: Learning to Curse: Essays in Early Modern Culture. Routledge; 1990:22-51.
145.
Greenblatt S. Learning to Curse: Aspects of Linguistic Colonialism in the Sixteenth Century. In: Learning to Curse: Essays in Early Modern Culture. Routledge; 1990:22-51. https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=1020235
146.
Clark S. The Tempest, or The Enchanted Island. In: Shakespeare Made Fit: Restoration Adaptations of Shakespeare. Everyman; 1997:79-185.
147.
Dobson M. ‘Remember/First to Possess his Books’: The Appropriation of The Tempest 1700-1800. In: Wells S, ed. Shakespeare Survey 43. Cambridge University Press; 1991:99-108. doi:10.1017/CCOL0521395291.009
148.
Maus KE. ‘Arcadia Host: Politics and Revision in the Restoration’ Tempest. Renaissance Drama. 1982;13:189-209. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43264634
149.
Wikander MH. ‘The Duke my Father’s Wrack’: The Innocence of the Restoration Tempest. In: Wells S, ed. Shakespeare Survey 43. Cambridge University Press; 1991:91-98. doi:10.1017/CCOL0521395291.008
150.
DiPietro C. Seeing Places: The Tempest and the Baroque Spectacle of the Restoration Theatre. Shakespeare. 2013;9(2):168-186. doi:10.1080/17450918.2013.784849
151.
Nicholl A. Three Adaptations. In: Nicoll A, ed. Shakespeare Survey 13. Cambridge University Press; 1960:137-145.
152.
Browning R. Caliban Upon Setebos | Poetry Foundation. https://web.archive.org/web/20170407155817/https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems-and-poets/poems/detail/43748
153.
Plath S. Full Fathom Five. In: The Colossus. Faber; 1967:46-47.
154.
Plath S. Ariel. Faber; 1965.
155.
Plath S. Ariel | Poetry Foundation. https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems-and-poets/poems/detail/49001
156.
Plath S. Full Fathom Five | Digital-Shakespeare. http://digital-shakespeare.angelfire.com/fullfathomplath.html
157.
Hughes T. Setebos. In: Birthday Letters. Faber; 1998.
158.
Hughes T. Night-Ride on Ariel. In: Birthday Letters. Faber; 1998.
159.
Hughes T. Freedom of Speech. In: Birthday Letters. Faber; 1998.
160.
Hughes T. Setebos | Immrama. Published 1998. http://immrama.blogspot.co.uk/2004/12/setebos-ted-hughes.html
161.
Shaw D. Extract. In: The Dialectical Temper: The Rhetorical Art of Robert Browning. Cornell University Press; 1968:193-203.
162.
Sawyer R. The Shakespeareanization of Robert Browning. In: Shakespeare and Appropriation. Vol Accents on Shakespeare. Routledge; 1999:142-159.
163.
Desmet C. The Shakespeareanization of Robert Browning. In: Shakespeare and Appropriation. Routledge; 1999:142-159. https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=169306
164.
Slinn EW. Extract. In: Browning and the Fictions of Identity. Macmillan; 1982:84-90.
165.
Wagner E. Ariel’s Gift: Ted Hughes, Sylvia Plath and the Story of Birthday Letters. Norton; 2001.
166.
Rose J. The Haunting of Sylvia Plath. Virago; 1991.
167.
Malcolm J. Silent Woman: Sylvia Plath and Ted Hughes. Papermac; 1995.
168.
Kirsch A. Introduction and Commentary. In: The Sea and the Mirror: A Commentary on Shakespeare’s the Tempest. Princeton University Press; 2003:xi-xliii.
169.
Auden WH. Balaam and his Ass: On the Literary Use of the Master-Servant Relationship. In: The Dyer’s Hand: And Other Essays. Faber; 1963:107-145.
170.
Auden WH. Balaam and The Ass: On the Literary Use of the Master-Servant Relationship. Encounter. 1954;(July):35-53. http://www.unz.org/Pub/Encounter-1954jul-00035
171.
Smith S. Extract. In: W. H. Auden. Vol Rereading literature. Blackwell; 1985:153-160.
172.
Fuller J. Extract. In: A Reader’s Guide to W. H. Auden. Thames & Hudson Ltd; 1970:157-165.
173.
Greenberg H. Extract. In: Quest for the Necessary: W. H. Auden and the Dilemma of Divided Consciousness. Harvard University Press; 1968:122-141.
174.
McDowell FPW. The Sea and the Mirror. In: Auden: A Collection of Critical Essays. Vol Twentieth century views. Prentice-Hall; 1964.
175.
Shakespeare W, Jarman D, Williams H. The Tempest. Published online 1979.
176.
Greenaway P, Shakespeare W. Prospero’s Books. Published online 2010.
177.
Buchanan J. Historically Juxtaposed Beans (II): The Tempest on Film. In: Shakespeare on Film. Vol Inside film. Longman; 2005:150-183.
178.
Buchanan J. The Tempest on Film. In: Shakespeare on Film. Pearson Longman; 2005. http://ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.myilibrary.com?id=177112
179.
Bulman JC. Drowning the Book: Prospero’s Books and the Textual Shakespeare. In: Shakespeare, Theory, and Performance. Routledge; 1996:189-212. https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=179529
180.
Bulman JC. Drowning the Book: Prospero’s Books and the Textual Shakespeare. In: Shakespeare, Theory and Performance. Routledge; 1996:189-212.
181.
Shaughnessy R. A Post-National European Cinema: A Consideration of Derek Jarman’s The Tempest and Edward II. In: Shakespeare on Film. Vol New Casebooks. Macmillan; 1998:145-155.
182.
Boose LE. Shakespeare in the Age of Post-Mechanical Reproduction: Sexual and Electronic Magic in Prospero’s Books. In: Shakespeare, The Movie: Popularizing the Plays on Film, TV and Video. Taylor and Francis; 1997:172-189. https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=240528
183.
Boose LE. Shakespeare in the Age of Post-Mechanical Reproduction: Sexual and Electronic Magic in Prospero’s Books. In: Shakespeare, the Movie: Popularizing the Plays on Film, TV and Video. Routledge; 1997:172-189.
184.
Greenaway P. Prospero’s Books: A Film of Shakespeare’s the Tempest. Chatto & Windus; 1991.
185.
Shakespeare W, Taymor J. The Tempest | Box of Broadcasts. Published online 2010. https://learningonscreen.ac.uk/ondemand/index.php/prog/05A9694D?bcast=123986425
186.
Cartmell D. Shakespeare, Film and Race: Screening Othello and The Tempest. In: Interpreting Shakespeare on Screen. St. Martin’s Press; 2000:67-93. https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/reader.action?docID=6234544&ppg=78
187.
Sibley-Esposito C. Becoming-Ariel: Viewing Julie Taymor’s The Tempest through an Ecocritical Lens. Babel. 2011;(24):121-134. doi:10.4000/babel.156
188.
Holderness G. Radical Potentiality and Institutional Closure: Shakespeare in Film and Television. In: Political Shakespeare: Essays in Cultural Materialism. Manchester University Press; 1994:206-225.
189.
Hopkins L. Shakespeare’s the Tempest: The Relationship Between Text and Film. Vol Screen adaptations. Methuen Drama; 2008.
190.
Taymor J, Shakespeare W. The Tempest. Abrams; 2010.