[1]
Adelman, J. 1992. Suffocating Mothers in King Lear. Suffocating Mothers: Fantasies of Maternal Origin in Shakespeare’s Plays, Hamlet to the Tempest. Routledge. 103–129.
[2]
Adelman, J. 1992. Suffocating Mothers in King Lear. Suffocating Mothers: Fantasies of Maternal Origin in Shakespeare’s Plays, Hamlet to the Tempest. Routledge. 103–129.
[3]
Ariel | Poetry Foundation: https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems-and-poets/poems/detail/49001.
[4]
Auden, W.H. 1963. Balaam and his Ass: On the Literary Use of the Master-Servant Relationship. The Dyer’s Hand: And Other Essays. Faber. 107–145.
[5]
Auden, W.H. 1954. Balaam and The Ass: On the Literary Use of the Master-Servant Relationship. Encounter. July (1954), 35–53.
[6]
Badawī, M.M. 1973. Coleridge: Critic of Shakespeare. Cambridge University Press.
[7]
Badawī, M.M. 1973. Coleridge: Critic of Shakespeare. Cambridge University Press.
[8]
Barker, H. 2007. A Style and Its Origins. Oberon Books.
[9]
Barker, H. 1993. Arguments for a Theatre. Manchester University Press.
[10]
Barker, H. 2005. Death, the One and the Art of Theatre. Routledge.
[11]
Barker, H. 2005. Death, the One and the Art of Theatre. Routledge.
[12]
Barker, H. 2009. Seven Lears: The Pursuit of Good. Plays Five. Oberon Books.
[13]
Bate, J. 2016. All the World His Stage. The Genius of Shakespeare. Picador Classic. 217–250.
[14]
Bate, J. 1992. Extract. The Romantics on Shakespeare. Penguin. 60–66.
[15]
Bate, J. 1992. King Lear. The Romantics on Shakespeare. Penguin. 381–405.
[16]
Bate, J. 1986. Shakespeare and the English Romantic Imagination. Clarendon.
[17]
Bate, J. 1986. Shakespeare and the English Romantic Imagination. Clarendon.
[18]
Bate, J. 1989. Shakespearean Constitutions: Politics, Theatre, Criticism, 1730-1830. Clarendon.
[19]
Bate, J. 1989. Shakespearean Constitutions: Politics, Theatre, Criticism, 1730-1830. Clarendon.
[20]
Bate, J. 1997. The Original Genius. The Genius of Shakespeare. Picador.
[21]
Bayley, J. 1981. The King’s Ship. Shakespeare and Tragedy. Routledge & Kegan Paul. 7–48.
[22]
Beckett, S. and Gontarski, S.E. 1992. Endgame. Faber and Faber.
[23]
Berger, H. 1997. King Lear: The Lear Family Romance. Making Trifles of Terrors: Redistributing Complicities in Shakespeare. Stanford University Press.
[24]
Berger, H. 1997. Text Against Performance:The Gloucester Family Romance. Making Trifles of Terrors: Redistributing Complicities in Shakespeare. Stanford University Press.
[25]
Bloom, H. 1999. King Lear. Shakespeare: The Invention of the Human. Fourth Estate. 476–515.
[26]
Bond, E. 1974. Bingo: Scenes of Money and Death. Methuen.
[27]
Bond, E. 1972. Drama and the Dialectic of Violence. Theatre Quarterly. 2, 5 (1972), 4–14.
[28]
Bond, E. 1972. Lear. Bloomsbury.
[29]
Bond, E. 1978. Plays: 2. Eyre Methuen.
[30]
Bond, E. 1987. Plays: 3. Methuen.
[31]
Bond, E. 2000. The Hidden Plot: Notes on Theatre and the State. Methuen Drama.
[32]
Bond, E. 2000. The Hidden Plot: Notes on Theatre and the State. Methuen Drama.
[33]
Boose, L.E. 1997. Shakespeare in the Age of Post-Mechanical Reproduction: Sexual and Electronic Magic in Prospero’s Books. Shakespeare, The Movie: Popularizing the Plays on Film, TV and Video. Taylor and Francis. 172–189.
[34]
Boose, L.E. 1997. Shakespeare in the Age of Post-Mechanical Reproduction: Sexual and Electronic Magic in Prospero’s Books. Shakespeare, the Movie: Popularizing the Plays on Film, TV and Video. Routledge. 172–189.
[35]
Booth, S. 1983. Extract. King Lear, Macbeth, Indefinition and Tragedy. Yale University Press. 5–57.
[36]
Bradley, A.C. 2007. ‘Lecture VII: King Lear’ and ‘Lecture VIII: King Lear’. Shakespearean Tragedy: Lectures on Hamlet, Othello, King Lear, Macbeth. Palgrave Macmillan. 182–210.
[37]
Bradley, A.C. 2007. Lecture VIII: King Lear. Shakespearean Tragedy: Lectures on Hamlet, Othello, King Lear, Macbeth. Palgrave Macmillan. 211–251.
[38]
Braudy, L. 2016. Finding Shakespeare on Film: From an Interview with Peter Brook. Film Theory and Criticism: Introductory Readings. L. Braudy and M. Cohen, eds. Oxford University Press.
[39]
Brauner, D. 2001. ‘Speak Again’: The Politics of Rewriting in ‘A Thousand Acres’. The Modern Language Review. 96, 3 (2001), 654–666. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/3736736.
[40]
Brown, P. 1994. This Thing of Darkness I Acknowledge Mine. Political Shakespeare: Essays in Cultural Materialism. Manchester University Press. 48–71.
[41]
Buchanan, J. 2005. Historically Juxtaposed Beans (II): The Tempest on Film. Shakespeare on Film. Longman. 150–183.
[42]
Buchanan, J. 2005. The Tempest on Film. Shakespeare on Film. Pearson Longman.
[43]
Bulman, J.C. 1996. Drowning the Book: Prospero’s Books and the Textual Shakespeare. Shakespeare, Theory, and Performance. Routledge. 189–212.
[44]
Bulman, J.C. 1996. Drowning the Book: Prospero’s Books and the Textual Shakespeare. Shakespeare, Theory and Performance. Routledge. 189–212.
[45]
Caliban Upon Setebos | Poetry Foundation: https://web.archive.org/web/20170407155817/https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems-and-poets/poems/detail/43748.
[46]
Cartelli, T. 2002. Shakespeare in Pain: Edward Bond’s Lear and the Ghosts of History. Shakespeare Survey 55. P. Holland, ed. Cambridge University Press. 159–169.
[47]
Cartmell, D. 2000. Shakespeare, Film and Race: Screening Othello and The Tempest. Interpreting Shakespeare on Screen. St. Martin’s Press. 67–93.
[48]
Clark, S. 1997. The Tempest, or The Enchanted Island. Shakespeare Made Fit: Restoration Adaptations of Shakespeare. Everyman. 79–185.
[49]
Crowl, S. 1994. The Bow Is Bent and Drawn: Kurosawa’s Ran and the Shakespearean Arrow of Desire. Literature Film Quarterly. 22, 2 (1994), 109–118.
[50]
Davies, A. 1994. Kurosawa’s Shakespeare Films: Throne of Blood, The Bad Sleep Well and Ran. Shakespeare and the Moving Image: The Plays on Film and Television. Cambridge University Press.
[51]
Desmet, C. 1999. The Shakespeareanization of Robert Browning. Shakespeare and Appropriation. Routledge. 142–159.
[52]
DiPietro, C. 2013. Seeing Places: The Tempest and the Baroque Spectacle of the Restoration Theatre. Shakespeare. 9, 2 (2013), 168–186. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/17450918.2013.784849.
[53]
Dobson, M. 1991. ‘Remember/First to Possess his Books’: The Appropriation of The Tempest 1700-1800. Shakespeare Survey 43. S. Wells, ed. Cambridge University Press. 99–108.
[54]
Donohue, J.W. 1970. Dramatic Character in the English Romantic Age. Princeton University Press.
[55]
Dutton, R. 2006. King Lear. A Companion to Shakespeare’s Works - Volume 1: The Tragedies. Blackwell. 375–392.
[56]
Dutton, R. 2003. King Lear. A Companion to Shakespeare’s Works, Volume I: The Tragedies. Blackwell. 375–392.
[57]
Edwards, P. 1958. Shakespeare’s Romances: 1900–1957. Shakespeare Survey 11. A. Nicoll, ed. Cambridge University Press. 1–18.
[58]
Evans, M. 1986. Extract. Signifying Nothing: Truth’s True Contents in Shakespeare’s Text. Harvester. 224–234.
[59]
Everett, B. 1960. The New King Lear. Critical Quarterly. 2, 4 (1960), 325–339. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8705.1960.tb00882.x.
[60]
Faragher, J.M. 2001. The Historical Imagination of A Thousand Acres. Novel History: Historians and Novelists Confront America’s Past (And Each Other). 146–159.
[61]
Field, A.S. 1982. King Lear Versus Lear at Stratford. Critical Quarterly. 24, 4 (1982), 5–14. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8705.1982.tb01893.x.
[62]
Foakes, R.A. 1997. Introduction. King Lear. Nelson. 1–110.
[63]
Foakes, R.A. 2002. King Lear and Endgame. Shakespeare Survey 55. P. Holland, ed. Cambridge University Press. 153–158.
[64]
Full Fathom Five | Digital-Shakespeare: http://digital-shakespeare.angelfire.com/fullfathomplath.html.
[65]
Fuller, J. 1970. Extract. A Reader’s Guide to W. H. Auden. Thames & Hudson Ltd. 157–165.
[66]
Gillies, J. 1994. Extract. Shakespeare and the Geography of Difference. Cambridge University Press. 140–155.
[67]
Goldberg, J. 1993. Perspectives: Dover Cliff and the Conditions of Representation. King Lear, William Shakespeare. Macmillan. 145–157.
[68]
Greenaway, P. 1991. Prospero’s Books: A Film of Shakespeare’s the Tempest. Chatto & Windus.
[69]
Greenaway, P. and Shakespeare, W. 2010. Prospero’s Books. Atlantic Film.
[70]
Greenberg, H. 1968. Extract. Quest for the Necessary: W. H. Auden and the Dilemma of Divided Consciousness. Harvard University Press. 122–141.
[71]
Greenblatt, S. 1990. Learning to Curse: Aspects of Linguistic Colonialism in the Sixteenth Century. Learning to Curse: Essays in Early Modern Culture. Routledge. 22–51.
[72]
Greenblatt, S. 1990. Learning to Curse: Aspects of Linguistic Colonialism in the Sixteenth Century. Learning to Curse: Essays in Early Modern Culture. Routledge. 22–51.
[73]
Greenblatt, S. 1988. Shakespeare and the Exorcists. Shakespearean Negotiations: The Circulation of Social Energy in Renaissance England. Clarendon. 94–128.
[74]
Greenblatt, S. 1988. Shakespeare and the Exorcists. Shakespearean Negotiations: The Circulation of Social Energy in Renaissance England. University of California Press. 94–128.
[75]
Greenblatt, S.J. 1988. Martial Law in the Land of Cockaigne. Shakespearean Negotiations: The Circulation of Social Energy in Renaissance England. Clarendon. 129–163.
[76]
Greenblatt, S.J. 1990. The Cultivation of Anxiety: King Lear and His Heirs. Learning to Curse: Essays in Early Modern Culture. Routledge. 80–98.
[77]
Gritzner, K. and Rabey, D.I. 2006. Theatre of Catastrophe: New Essays on Howard Barker. London.
[78]
Hawkes, T. 1986. Playhouse-Workhouse. That Shakespearian Rag: Essays on a Critical Process. Methuen. 1–26.
[79]
Hay, M. and Roberts, P. 1980. Bond: A Study of His Plays. Methuen.
[80]
Hazlitt, W. and Quiller-Couch, A. 1939. Lear. Characters of Shakespeare’s Plays. Humphrey Milford.
[81]
Hibbard, G.R. 1981. King Lear: A Retrospect, 1939–79. Shakespeare Survey 33. K. Muir, ed. Cambridge University Press. 1–12.
[82]
Hibbard, G.R. 1981. King Lear: A Retrospect, 1939–79. Shakespeare Survey 33. K. Muir, ed. Cambridge University Press. 1–12.
[83]
Hirst, D.L. 1985. Edward Bond. Macmillan.
[84]
Hodgdon, B. 1977. Kozintsev’s King Lear: Filming a Tragic Poem. Literature/Film Quarterly. 5, 4 (1977), 291–298.
[85]
Hodgdon, B. 1983. Two King Lears: Uncovering the Filmtext. Literature/Film Quarterly. 11, 3 (1983), 143–151.
[86]
Holderness, G. 1994. Radical Potentiality and Institutional Closure: Shakespeare in Film and Television. Political Shakespeare: Essays in Cultural Materialism. Manchester University Press. 206–225.
[87]
Holland, P. 1995. The Shapeliness of The Tempest. Essays in Criticism. XLV, 3 (1995), 208–229. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/eic/XLV.3.208.
[88]
Holland, P. 1994. Two‑Dimensional Shakespeare: King Lear on Film. Shakespeare and the Moving Image: The Plays on Film and Television. Cambridge University Press. 50–68.
[89]
Hopkins, L. 2008. Shakespeare’s the Tempest: The Relationship Between Text and Film. Methuen Drama.
[90]
Hughes, T. 1998. Freedom of Speech. Birthday Letters. Faber.
[91]
Hughes, T. 1998. Night-Ride on Ariel. Birthday Letters. Faber.
[92]
Hughes, T. 1998. Setebos. Birthday Letters. Faber.
[93]
Hulme, P. and Sherman, W.H. 2004. The Tempest: Sources and Contexts, Criticism, Rewritings and Appropriations. W. W. Norton.
[94]
Hunter, G.K. 2005. The Play in Performance. King Lear. Penguin.
[95]
Irvine, L. 2006. Podcast: Howard Barker talks | Stage. The Guardian. (Dec. 2006).
[96]
Johnson, S. 1989. Extract. Samuel Johnson on Shakespeare. Penguin. 166–169.
[97]
Jorgens, J.J. 1991. Chapter 10. Shakespeare on Film. University Press of America.
[98]
Jorgens, J.J. 1991. Chapter 10. Shakespeare on Film. University Press of America.
[99]
Kahn, C. 1993. The Absent Mother in King Lear. King Lear, William Shakespeare. Macmillan. 92–113.
[100]
Kay, C.M. 1978. An Overview of Critical Approaches to the Romances. Shakespeare’s Romances Reconsidered. University of Nebraska Press.
[101]
Kennedy, D. 1993. Introduction: Shakespeare Without His Language. Foreign Shakespeare: Contemporary Performance. Cambridge University Press. 1–18.
[102]
Kennedy, D. 2001. Shakespeare and the Visual. Looking at Shakespeare: A Visual History of Twentieth-Century Performance. Cambridge University Press.
[103]
Kermode, F. 1992. Part 1: Early Comments and Critiques. Shakespeare, King Lear: A Casebook. Macmillan Education. 25–45.
[104]
Kermode, F. 1992. Shakespeare, King Lear: A Casebook. Macmillan Educ.
[105]
Kettle, A. 1964. From Hamlet to Lear. Shakespeare in a Changing World: Essays. Lawrence & Wishart. 146–171.
[106]
Kirsch, A. 2003. Introduction and Commentary. The Sea and the Mirror: A Commentary on Shakespeare’s the Tempest. Princeton University Press. xi–xliii.
[107]
Knight, G.W. 1989. King Lear and the Comedy of the Grotesque. The Wheel of Fire: Interpretations of Shakespearean Tragedy, With Three New Essays. Routledge. 201–234.
[108]
Knight, G.W. 2001. King Lear and the Comedy of the Grotesque. The Wheel of Fire: Interpretations of Shakespearian Tragedy. Routledge. 181–200.
[109]
Knight, G.W. 1992. King Lear and the Comedy of the Grotesque. Shakespeare, King Lear: A Casebook. Macmillan Educ. 107–122.
[110]
Knight, G.W. 1989. The Lear Universe. The Wheel of Fire: Interpretations of Shakespearean Tragedy, With Three New Essays. Routledge. 181–200.
[111]
Knight, G.W. 1989. The Lear Universe. The Wheel of Fire: Interpretations of Shakespearian Tragedy. Routledge. 201–234.
[112]
Knight, G.W. 1965. The Shakespearian Superman: A Study of The Tempest. The Crown of Life: Essays in Interpretation of Shakespeare’s Final Plays. Methuen. 203–255.
[113]
Ko, Y.J. 2012. Shakespearean Characters and Early Modern Subjectivity: The Case of King Lear. Shakespeare’s Sense of Character: On the Page and From the Stage. Ashgate. 35–52.
[114]
Ko, Y.J. 2012. Shakespearean Characters and Early Modern Subjectivity: The Case of King Lear. Shakespeare’s Sense of Character: On the Page and From the Stage. Ashgate. 35–52.
[115]
Kott, J. 1967. King Lear, or Endgame. Shakespeare Our Contemporary. Methuen. 100–133.
[116]
Kott, J. 1967. King Lear, or Endgame. Shakespeare: An Anthology of Criticism and Theory, 1945-2000. Blackwell Pub. 174–190.
[117]
Kott, J. 1967. King Lear, or Endgame. Shakespeare Our Contemporary. Methuen. 100–133.
[118]
Kott, J. 1967. King Lear, or Endgame. Shakespeare: An Anthology of Criticism and Theory, 1945-2000. Blackwell Pub. 174–190.
[119]
Kott, J. 1967. Prospero’s Staff. Shakespeare Our Contemporary. Methuen.
[120]
Kozintsev, G.M. and Mackintosh, M. 1977. ‘King Lear’, the Space of Tragedy: The Diary of a Film Director. Heinemann Educational.
[121]
Lamb, C. 2005. The Theatre of Howard Barker. Routledge.
[122]
Linton, J.P. 2006. Kurosawa’s Ran (1985) and Shakespeare’s King Lear: Towards a Conversation on Historical Responsibility’. Quarterly Review of Film and Video. 23, 4 (2006), 341–351. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/10509200690897608.
[123]
Magnusson, A.L. 1986. Interruption in ‘The Tempest’. Shakespeare Quarterly. 37, 1 (1986), 52–65. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/2870191.
[124]
Malcolm, J. 1995. Silent Woman: Sylvia Plath and Ted Hughes. Papermac.
[125]
Marcus, L.S. 1988. Retrospective: King Lear on St Stephen’s Night, 1606. Puzzling Shakespeare: Local Reading and Its Discontents. University of California Press. 148–159.
[126]
Maus, K.E. 1982. ‘Arcadia Host: Politics and Revision in the Restoration’ Tempest. Renaissance Drama. 13, (1982), 189–209.
[127]
McDonald, R. 1991. Reading The Tempest. Shakespeare Survey 43. S. Wells, ed. Cambridge University Press. 15–28.
[128]
McDonald, R. 2004. Shakespeare: An Anthology of Criticism and Theory, 1945-2000. Blackwell Pub.
[129]
McDonald, R. 2004. The "New Criticism” and King Lear. Shakespeare: An Anthology of Criticism and Theory, 1945-2000. Blackwell Pub. 63–88.
[130]
McDowell, F.P.W. 1964. The Sea and the Mirror. Auden: A Collection of Critical Essays. Prentice-Hall.
[131]
Moorhouse, J. 2006. A Thousand Acres. Universal.
[132]
Neill, M. 2008. ‘Noises, / Sounds, and Sweet Airs’: The Burden of Shakespeare’s ‘Tempest’. Shakespeare Quarterly. 59, 1 (2008), 36–59.
[133]
Nicholl, A. 1960. Three Adaptations. Shakespeare Survey 13. A. Nicoll, ed. Cambridge University Press. 137–145.
[134]
Nodelman, P. 1980. Beyond Politics in Bond’s Lear. Modern Drama. 23, 3 (1980), 269–276. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1353/mdr.1980.0011.
[135]
Novy, M. 1999. King Lear and A Thousand Acres: Gender, Genre and the Revisionary Impulse. Transforming Shakespeare: Twentieth-Century Women’s Re-Visions. Macmillan.
[136]
Novy, M. 1999. The Polluted Quarry: Nature and Body in A Thousand Acres. Transforming Shakespeare: Twentieth-Century Women’s Re-Visions. Macmillan.
[137]
On Sitting Down to Read King Lear Once Again | Poetry Foundation: https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems-and-poets/poems/detail/44482.
[138]
Orgel, S. 1987. Introduction. The Tempest. Clarendon.
[139]
Palmer, D.J. 1968. Extract. Shakespeare, The Tempest: A Casebook. Macmillan. 34–71.
[140]
Palmer, D.J. 1967. Introduction to The Tempest. Shakespeare, the Tempest: A Casebook. Macmillan.
[141]
Palmer, D.J. 1968. Shakespeare’s Dream. Shakespeare, the Tempest: A Casebook. Macmillan. 109–129.
[142]
Parker, G.F. 1989. Johnson’s Shakespeare. Clarendon.
[143]
Parker, G.F. 1989. Johnson’s Shakespeare. Clarendon.
[144]
Patterson, A.M. 1989. "What Matter Who’s Speaking?”: Hamlet and King Lear. Shakespeare and the Popular Voice. 93–119.
[145]
Plath, S. 1965. Ariel. Faber.
[146]
Plath, S. 1967. Full Fathom Five. The Colossus. Faber. 46–47.
[147]
Rabey, D.I. 2008. Howard Baker: Ecstasy and Death: An Expository Study of His Plays and Production Work, 1988-2008. Palgrave Macmillan.
[148]
Raleigh, W. 1907. The Last Phase. Shakespeare. Macmillan.
[149]
Rose, J. 1991. The Haunting of Sylvia Plath. Virago.
[150]
Ryan, K. 2005. Introduction. King Lear. Penguin. xxi–lxiv.
[151]
Ryan, K. 1999. Introduction. Shakespeare: The Last Plays. Longman. 4–12.
[152]
Ryan, K. 1999. Introduction. Shakespeare: The Last Plays. Longman. 1–21.
[153]
Ryan, K. 2002. The Tempest: The Complicities of Art. Shakespeare. Palgrave.
[154]
Ryan, K. 2002. The Tempest: The Complicities of Art. Shakespeare. Palgrave.
[155]
Ryan, K. 1999. "What Cares These Roarers for the Name of King?”: Language and Utopia in The Tempest. Shakespeare: The Last Plays. Longman. 245–278.
[156]
Sawyer, R. 1999. Remembering King Lear in Jane Smiley’s A Thousand Acres. Shakespeare and Appropriation. Routledge. 85–102.
[157]
Sawyer, R. 1999. Remembering King Lear in Jane Smiley’s A Thousand Acres. Shakespeare and Appropriation. Routledge. 85–102.
[158]
Sawyer, R. 1999. The Shakespeareanization of Robert Browning. Shakespeare and Appropriation. Routledge. 142–159.
[159]
Setebos | Immrama: 1998. http://immrama.blogspot.co.uk/2004/12/setebos-ted-hughes.html.
[160]
Shakespeare, W. 1997. King Lear. Nelson.
[161]
Shakespeare, W. et al. 2005. The Popular Voice of King Lear. King Lear: Contemporary Critical Essays. Penguin. 130–144.
[162]
Shakespeare, W. et al. 1979. The Tempest. Second Sight.
[163]
Shakespeare, W. and Orgel, S. 1987. The Tempest. Clarendon.
[164]
Shakespeare, W. and Taymor, J. 2010. The Tempest | Box of Broadcasts.
[165]
Shaughnessy, R. 1998. A Post-National European Cinema: A Consideration of Derek Jarman’s The Tempest and Edward II. Shakespeare on Film. Macmillan. 145–155.
[166]
Shaw, D. 1968. Extract. The Dialectical Temper: The Rhetorical Art of Robert Browning. Cornell University Press. 193–203.
[167]
Sibley-Esposito, C. 2011. Becoming-Ariel: Viewing Julie Taymor’s The Tempest through an Ecocritical Lens. Babel. 24 (2011), 121–134. DOI:https://doi.org/10.4000/babel.156.
[168]
Sinfield, A. 1994. The Patriarchal Bard: Feminist Criticism and Shakespeare: King Lear and Measure for Measure. Political Shakespeare: Essays in Cultural Materialism. Manchester University Press. 88–108.
[169]
Slinn, E.W. 1982. Extract. Browning and the Fictions of Identity. Macmillan. 84–90.
[170]
Smiley, J. 1992. A Thousand Acres. Flamingo.
[171]
Smith, S. 1985. Extract. W. H. Auden. Blackwell. 153–160.
[172]
Sokolyansky, M. 2007. Grigori Kozintsev’s Hamlet and King Lear. The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare on Film. Cambridge University Press. 203–215.
[173]
Sokolyansky, M. 2007. Grigori Kozintsev’s Hamlet and King Lear. The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare on Film. Cambridge University Press. 203–215.
[174]
Strachey, L. 1922. Shakespeare’s Final Period. Books and Characters: French and English. Chatto and Windus.
[175]
Taylor, M. 2001. Shakespeare Criticism in the Twentieth Century. Oxford University Press.
[176]
Taymor, J. and Shakespeare, W. 2010. The Tempest. Abrams.
[177]
Thompson, A. 1988. King Lear. Macmillan.
[178]
Vickers, B. 1974. Shakespeare, the Critical Heritage - Volume 1, 1623-1692. Routledge and Kegan Paul.
[179]
Vickers, B. 1974. Shakespeare, the Critical Heritage - Volume 2, 1693-1733. Routledge and Kegan Paul.
[180]
Vickers, B. 1975. Shakespeare, the Critical Heritage - Volume 3, 1733-1752. Routledge and Kegan Paul.
[181]
Vickers, B. 1976. Shakespeare, the Critical Heritage - Volume 4, 1753-1765. Routledge and Kegan Paul.
[182]
Vickers, B. 1979. Shakespeare, the Critical Heritage - Volume 5, 1765-1774. Routledge and Kegan Paul.
[183]
Vickers, B. 1981. Shakespeare, the Critical Heritage - Volume 6, 1774-1801. Routledge and Kegan Paul.
[184]
Vickers, B. 1981. Shakespeare: The Critical Heritage 1623-1801. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
[185]
Wagner, E. 2001. Ariel’s Gift: Ted Hughes, Sylvia Plath and the Story of Birthday Letters. Norton.
[186]
Wikander, M.H. 1991. ‘The Duke my Father’s Wrack’: The Innocence of the Restoration Tempest. Shakespeare Survey 43. S. Wells, ed. Cambridge University Press. 91–98.
[187]
Wood, N. 1995. Political Criticism at the Crossroads: The Utopian Historicism. The Tempest. Open University Press. 29–66.
[188]
Woudhuysen, H.R. 1989. Notes on King Lear. Samuel Johnson on Shakespeare. Penguin. 219–223.
[189]
Yachnin, P.E. 2009. The Properties of Character in King Lear. Shakespeare and Character: Theory, History, Performance, and Theatrical Persons. Palgrave Macmillan. 98–116.
[190]
Zimmerman, S. 1998. Perspectives: Dover Cliff and the  Conditions of Representation. Shakespeare’s Tragedies. Macmillan. 155–166.