1.
Shakespeare W. King Lear. New Edition. Foakes RA, editor. Walton-on-Thames: Nelson; 1997.
2.
Ryan K. Introduction. King Lear. London: Penguin; 2005. p. xxi–lxiv.
3.
Hunter GK. The Play in Performance. King Lear. London: Penguin; 2005.
4.
Foakes RA. Introduction. King Lear. New Edition. Walton-on-Thames: Nelson; 1997. p. 1–110.
5.
Bloom H. King Lear. Shakespeare: The Invention of the Human. London: Fourth Estate; 1999. p. 476–515.
6.
Bayley J. The King’s Ship. Shakespeare and Tragedy. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul; 1981. p. 7–48.
7.
Booth S. Extract. King Lear, Macbeth, Indefinition and Tragedy. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1983. p. 5–57.
8.
Berger H. King Lear: The Lear Family Romance. Making Trifles of Terrors: Redistributing Complicities in Shakespeare. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press; 1997.
9.
Berger H. Text Against Performance:The Gloucester Family Romance. Making Trifles of Terrors: Redistributing Complicities in Shakespeare. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press; 1997.
10.
Woudhuysen HR. Notes on King Lear. Samuel Johnson on Shakespeare. Harmondsworth: Penguin; 1989. p. 219–223.
11.
Bate J. King Lear. The Romantics on Shakespeare. Harmondsworth: Penguin; 1992. p. 381–405.
12.
Hazlitt W, Quiller-Couch A. Lear. Characters of Shakespeare’s Plays. London: Humphrey Milford; 1939.
13.
Keats J. On Sitting Down to Read King Lear Once Again | Poetry Foundation [Internet]. Available from: https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems-and-poets/poems/detail/44482
14.
Kermode F. Part 1: Early Comments and Critiques. Shakespeare, King Lear: A Casebook. Revised Edition. Macmillan Education; 1992. p. 25–45.
15.
Parker GF. Johnson’s Shakespeare. Oxford: Clarendon; 1989.
16.
Bate J. The Original Genius. The Genius of Shakespeare. London: Picador; 1997.
17.
Bate J. All the World His Stage. The Genius of Shakespeare. Picador Classic Edition. London: Picador Classic; 2016. p. 217–250.
18.
Bate J. Shakespeare and the English Romantic Imagination. Oxford: Clarendon; 1986.
19.
Bate J. Shakespearean Constitutions: Politics, Theatre, Criticism, 1730-1830. Oxford: Clarendon; 1989.
20.
Badawī MM. Coleridge: Critic of Shakespeare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1973.
21.
Vickers B. Shakespeare: The Critical Heritage 1623-1801. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul; 1981.
22.
Bradley AC. ‘Lecture VII: King Lear’ and ‘Lecture VIII: King Lear’. Shakespearean Tragedy: Lectures on Hamlet, Othello, King Lear, Macbeth. 4th Edition. Houndsmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2007. p. 182–210.
23.
Bradley AC. Lecture VIII: King Lear. Shakespearean Tragedy: Lectures on Hamlet, Othello, King Lear, Macbeth. 4th Edition. Houndsmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2007. p. 211–251.
24.
Kermode F. Shakespeare, King Lear: A Casebook. Rev. ed. Macmillan Educ; 1992.
25.
Knight GW. King Lear and the Comedy of the Grotesque. The Wheel of Fire: Interpretations of Shakespearean Tragedy, With Three New Essays. 4th Revised and Enlarged Edition. London: Routledge; 1989. p. 201–234.
26.
Knight GW. King Lear and the Comedy of the Grotesque. The Wheel of Fire: Interpretations of Shakespearian Tragedy [Internet]. London: Routledge; 2001. p. 181–200. Available from: https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=240630
27.
Knight GW. The Lear Universe. The Wheel of Fire: Interpretations of Shakespearean Tragedy, With Three New Essays. 4th Revised and Enlarged Edition. London: Routledge; 1989. p. 181–200.
28.
Knight GW. The Lear Universe. The Wheel of Fire: Interpretations of Shakespearian Tragedy [Internet]. London: Routledge; 1989. p. 201–234. Available from: https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=240630
29.
Knight GW. King Lear and the Comedy of the Grotesque. Shakespeare, King Lear: A Casebook. Revised Edition. Macmillan Educ; 1992. p. 107–122.
30.
Kott J. King Lear, or Endgame. Shakespeare Our Contemporary. 2nd Revised Edition. London: Methuen; 1967. p. 100–133.
31.
Kott J. King Lear, or Endgame. Shakespeare: An Anthology of Criticism and Theory, 1945-2000. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub; 1967. p. 174–190.
32.
Kettle A. From Hamlet to Lear. Shakespeare in a Changing World: Essays. London: Lawrence & Wishart; 1964. p. 146–171.
33.
McDonald R. Shakespeare: An Anthology of Criticism and Theory, 1945-2000. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub; 2004.
34.
Hibbard GR. King Lear: A Retrospect, 1939–79. In: Muir K, editor. Shakespeare Survey 33 [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1981. p. 1–12. Available from: http://universitypublishingonline.org/ref/id/shakespeare/CBO9781139053105A004
35.
Thompson A. King Lear. Basingstoke: Macmillan; 1988.
36.
McDonald R. The "New Criticism” and King Lear. Shakespeare: An Anthology of Criticism and Theory, 1945-2000. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub; 2004. p. 63–88.
37.
Everett B. The New King Lear. Critical Quarterly. 1960;2(4):325–339.
38.
Beckett S, Gontarski SE. Endgame. London: Faber and Faber; 1992.
39.
Foakes RA. King Lear and Endgame. In: Holland P, editor. Shakespeare Survey 55 [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002. p. 153–158. Available from: http://universitypublishingonline.org/ref/id/shakespeare/CBO9781139052696A016
40.
Taylor M. Shakespeare Criticism in the Twentieth Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001.
41.
Greenblatt S. Shakespeare and the Exorcists. Shakespearean Negotiations: The Circulation of Social Energy in Renaissance England. Oxford: Clarendon; 1988. p. 94–128.
42.
Greenblatt S. Shakespeare and the Exorcists. Shakespearean Negotiations: The Circulation of Social Energy in Renaissance England [Internet]. University of California Press; 1988. p. 94–128. Available from: https://hdl-handle-net.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/2027/heb09132.0001.001
43.
Kahn C. The Absent Mother in King Lear. King Lear, William Shakespeare. Basingstoke: Macmillan; 1993. p. 92–113.
44.
Goldberg J. Perspectives: Dover Cliff and the Conditions of Representation. King Lear, William Shakespeare. Basingstoke: Macmillan; 1993. p. 145–157.
45.
Zimmerman S. Perspectives: Dover Cliff and the  Conditions of Representation. Shakespeare’s Tragedies. Basingstoke: Macmillan; 1998. p. 155–166.
46.
Dutton R. King Lear. A Companion to Shakespeare’s Works - Volume 1: The Tragedies. Oxford: Blackwell; 2006. p. 375–392.
47.
Dutton R. King Lear. A Companion to Shakespeare’s Works, Volume I: The Tragedies [Internet]. Malden, Mass: Blackwell; 2003. p. 375–392. Available from: https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=350884
48.
Hibbard GR. King Lear: A Retrospect, 1939–79. In: Muir K, editor. Shakespeare Survey 33 [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1981. p. 1–12. Available from: http://universitypublishingonline.org/ref/id/shakespeare/CBO9781139053105A004
49.
Patterson AM. "What Matter Who’s Speaking?”: Hamlet and King Lear. Shakespeare and the Popular Voice. 1989. p. 93–119.
50.
Shakespeare W, Hunter G, Ryan K. The Popular Voice of King Lear. King Lear: Contemporary Critical Essays. London: Penguin; 2005. p. 130–144.
51.
Adelman J. Suffocating Mothers in King Lear. Suffocating Mothers: Fantasies of Maternal Origin in Shakespeare’s Plays, Hamlet to the Tempest. New York: Routledge; 1992. p. 103–129.
52.
Adelman J. Suffocating Mothers in King Lear. Suffocating Mothers: Fantasies of Maternal Origin in Shakespeare’s Plays, Hamlet to the Tempest [Internet]. New York: Routledge; 1992. p. 103–129. Available from: https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=3060994
53.
Greenblatt SJ. The Cultivation of Anxiety: King Lear and His Heirs. Learning to Curse: Essays in Early Modern Culture. New York: Routledge; 1990. p. 80–98.
54.
Evans M. Extract. Signifying Nothing: Truth’s True Contents in Shakespeare’s Text. Brighton: Harvester; 1986. p. 224–234.
55.
Marcus LS. Retrospective: King Lear on St Stephen’s Night, 1606. Puzzling Shakespeare: Local Reading and Its Discontents. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1988. p. 148–159.
56.
Sinfield A. The Patriarchal Bard: Feminist Criticism and Shakespeare: King Lear and Measure for Measure. Political Shakespeare: Essays in Cultural Materialism. 2nd Edition. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 1994. p. 88–108.
57.
Yachnin PE. The Properties of Character in King Lear. Shakespeare and Character: Theory, History, Performance, and Theatrical Persons. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2009. p. 98–116.
58.
Ko YJ. Shakespearean Characters and Early Modern Subjectivity: The Case of King Lear. Shakespeare’s Sense of Character: On the Page and From the Stage. Farnham, Surrey, England: Ashgate; 2012. p. 35–52.
59.
Ko YJ. Shakespearean Characters and Early Modern Subjectivity: The Case of King Lear. Shakespeare’s Sense of Character: On the Page and From the Stage [Internet]. Farnham: Ashgate; 2012. p. 35–52. Available from: https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=4470669
60.
Bond E. Lear. Hern P, editor. London: Bloomsbury; 1972.
61.
Bond E. Plays: 2. London: Eyre Methuen; 1978.
62.
Cartelli T. Shakespeare in Pain: Edward Bond’s Lear and the Ghosts of History. In: Holland P, editor. Shakespeare Survey 55 [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002. p. 159–169. Available from: http://universitypublishingonline.org/ref/id/shakespeare/CBO9781139052696A017
63.
Field AS. King Lear Versus Lear at Stratford. Critical Quarterly. 1982;24(4):5–14.
64.
Bond E. Drama and the Dialectic of Violence. Theatre Quarterly. 1972;2(5):4–14.
65.
Nodelman P. Beyond Politics in Bond’s Lear. Modern Drama. 1980;23(3):269–276.
66.
Bond E. Bingo: Scenes of Money and Death. London: Methuen; 1974.
67.
Bond E. Plays: 3. London: Methuen; 1987.
68.
Bond E. The Hidden Plot: Notes on Theatre and the State. London: Methuen Drama; 2000.
69.
Bond E. The Hidden Plot: Notes on Theatre and the State. London: Methuen Drama; 2000.
70.
Hay M, Roberts P. Bond: A Study of His Plays. London: Methuen; 1980.
71.
Hirst DL. Edward Bond. London: Macmillan; 1985.
72.
Barker H. Seven Lears: The Pursuit of Good. Plays Five. London: Oberon Books; 2009.
73.
Barker H. Arguments for a Theatre. 2nd Edition. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 1993.
74.
Barker H. A Style and Its Origins. London: Oberon Books; 2007.
75.
Rabey DI. Howard Baker: Ecstasy and Death: An Expository Study of His Plays and Production Work, 1988-2008. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2008.
76.
Barker H. Death, the One and the Art of Theatre. London: Routledge; 2005.
77.
Barker H. Death, the One and the Art of Theatre [Internet]. London: Routledge; 2005. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=199576
78.
Lamb C. The Theatre of Howard Barker. Revised Edition. London: Routledge; 2005.
79.
Gritzner K, Rabey DI. Theatre of Catastrophe: New Essays on Howard Barker. London; 2006.
80.
Irvine L. Podcast: Howard Barker talks | Stage. The Guardian [Internet]. 2006 Dec 6; Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/stage/theatreblog/2006/dec/06/podcasthowardbarkertalks
81.
Smiley J. A Thousand Acres. London: Flamingo; 1992.
82.
Brauner D. ‘Speak Again’: The Politics of Rewriting in ‘A Thousand Acres’. The Modern Language Review. 2001;96(3):654–666.
83.
Sawyer R. Remembering King Lear in Jane Smiley’s A Thousand Acres. Shakespeare and Appropriation. Routledge; 1999. p. 85–102.
84.
Sawyer R. Remembering King Lear in Jane Smiley’s A Thousand Acres. Shakespeare and Appropriation [Internet]. London: Routledge; 1999. p. 85–102. Available from: https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=169306
85.
Novy M. King Lear and A Thousand Acres: Gender, Genre and the Revisionary Impulse. Transforming Shakespeare: Twentieth-Century Women’s Re-Visions. Basingstoke: Macmillan; 1999.
86.
Novy M. The Polluted Quarry: Nature and Body in A Thousand Acres. Transforming Shakespeare: Twentieth-Century Women’s Re-Visions. Basingstoke: Macmillan; 1999.
87.
Faragher JM. The Historical Imagination of A Thousand Acres. Novel History: Historians and Novelists Confront America’s Past (And Each Other). 2001. p. 146–159.
88.
Moorhouse J. A Thousand Acres. Universal; 2006.
89.
Kott J. King Lear, or Endgame. Shakespeare Our Contemporary. 2nd Revised Edition. London: Methuen; 1967. p. 100–133.
90.
Kott J. King Lear, or Endgame. Shakespeare: An Anthology of Criticism and Theory, 1945-2000. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub; 1967. p. 174–190.
91.
Holland P. Two‑Dimensional Shakespeare: King Lear on Film. Shakespeare and the Moving Image: The Plays on Film and Television. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1994. p. 50–68.
92.
Hodgdon B. Two King Lears: Uncovering the Filmtext. Literature/Film Quarterly [Internet]. 1983;11(3):143–151. Available from: http://search.proquest.com/fiaf/docview/226985750/D5CF782E5FD7491CPQ/4?accountid=11455
93.
Sokolyansky M. Grigori Kozintsev’s Hamlet and King Lear. The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare on Film. 2nd Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007. p. 203–215.
94.
Sokolyansky M. Grigori Kozintsev’s Hamlet and King Lear. The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare on Film [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007. p. 203–215. Available from: http://ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521866006
95.
Hodgdon B. Kozintsev’s King Lear: Filming a Tragic Poem. Literature/Film Quarterly [Internet]. 1977;5(4):291–298. Available from: http://search.proquest.com/fiaf/docview/226982216/85C4A81B35A640C6PQ/5?accountid=11455
96.
Braudy L. Finding Shakespeare on Film: From an Interview with Peter Brook. In: Braudy L, Cohen M, editors. Film Theory and Criticism: Introductory Readings. 8th Edition. New York: Oxford University Press; 2016.
97.
Jorgens JJ. Chapter 10. Shakespeare on Film. Lanham, Md: University Press of America; 1991.
98.
Kozintsev GM, Mackintosh M. ‘King Lear’, the Space of Tragedy: The Diary of a Film Director. London: Heinemann Educational; 1977.
99.
Kennedy D. Introduction: Shakespeare Without His Language. Foreign Shakespeare: Contemporary Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1993. p. 1–18.
100.
Davies A. Kurosawa’s Shakespeare Films: Throne of Blood, The Bad Sleep Well and Ran. Shakespeare and the Moving Image: The Plays on Film and Television. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1994.
101.
Linton JP. Kurosawa’s Ran (1985) and Shakespeare’s King Lear: Towards a Conversation on Historical Responsibility’. Quarterly Review of Film and Video. 2006;23(4):341–351.
102.
Crowl S. The Bow Is Bent and Drawn: Kurosawa’s Ran and the Shakespearean Arrow of Desire. Literature Film Quarterly [Internet]. 1994;22(2):109–118. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/43796627
103.
Jorgens JJ. Chapter 10. Shakespeare on Film. Lanham, Md: University Press of America; 1991.
104.
Kennedy D. Shakespeare and the Visual. Looking at Shakespeare: A Visual History of Twentieth-Century Performance. 2nd Edition. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2001.
105.
Shakespeare W, Orgel S. The Tempest [Internet]. Oxford: Clarendon; 1987. Available from: https://www-oxfordscholarlyeditions-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/display/10.1093/actrade/9780198129172.book.1/actrade-9780198129172-book-1
106.
Hulme P, Sherman WH. The Tempest: Sources and Contexts, Criticism, Rewritings and Appropriations. New York: W. W. Norton; 2004.
107.
Orgel S. Introduction. The Tempest [Internet]. Oxford: Clarendon; 1987. Available from: https://www-oxfordscholarlyeditions-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/display/10.1093/actrade/9780198129172.book.1/actrade-9780198129172-book-1
108.
McDonald R. Reading The Tempest. In: Wells S, editor. Shakespeare Survey 43. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1991. p. 15–28.
109.
Holland P. The Shapeliness of The Tempest. Essays in Criticism. 1995;XLV(3):208–229.
110.
Neill M. ‘Noises, / Sounds, and Sweet Airs’: The Burden of Shakespeare’s ‘Tempest’. Shakespeare Quarterly [Internet]. Folger Shakespeare LibraryGeorge Washington UniversityFolger Shakespeare Library; 2008;59(1):36–59. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/40210245
111.
Magnusson AL. Interruption in ‘The Tempest’. Shakespeare Quarterly. 1986;37(1):52–65.
112.
Kott J. Prospero’s Staff. Shakespeare Our Contemporary. 2nd Revised Edition. London: Methuen; 1967.
113.
Ryan K. The Tempest: The Complicities of Art. Shakespeare. 3rd Edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave; 2002.
114.
Ryan K. The Tempest: The Complicities of Art. Shakespeare [Internet]. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave; 2002. Available from: https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=5297581
115.
Palmer DJ. Extract. Shakespeare, The Tempest: A Casebook. London: Macmillan; 1968. p. 34–71.
116.
Johnson S. Extract. Samuel Johnson on Shakespeare. Harmondsworth: Penguin; 1989. p. 166–169.
117.
Bate J. Extract. The Romantics on Shakespeare. Harmondsworth: Penguin; 1992. p. 60–66.
118.
Parker GF. Johnson’s Shakespeare. Oxford: Clarendon; 1989.
119.
Donohue JW. Dramatic Character in the English Romantic Age. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press; 1970.
120.
Badawī MM. Coleridge: Critic of Shakespeare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1973.
121.
Bate J. Shakespeare and the English Romantic Imagination. Oxford: Clarendon; 1986.
122.
Bate J. Shakespearean Constitutions: Politics, Theatre, Criticism, 1730-1830. Oxford: Clarendon; 1989.
123.
Vickers B. Shakespeare, the Critical Heritage - Volume 1, 1623-1692. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul; 1974.
124.
Vickers B. Shakespeare, the Critical Heritage - Volume 2, 1693-1733. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul; 1974.
125.
Vickers B. Shakespeare, the Critical Heritage - Volume 3, 1733-1752. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul; 1975.
126.
Vickers B. Shakespeare, the Critical Heritage - Volume 4, 1753-1765. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul; 1976.
127.
Vickers B. Shakespeare, the Critical Heritage - Volume 5, 1765-1774. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul; 1979.
128.
Vickers B. Shakespeare, the Critical Heritage - Volume 6, 1774-1801. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul; 1981.
129.
Palmer DJ. Introduction to The Tempest. Shakespeare, the Tempest: A Casebook. London: Macmillan; 1967.
130.
Palmer DJ. Shakespeare’s Dream. Shakespeare, the Tempest: A Casebook. London: Macmillan; 1968. p. 109–129.
131.
Knight GW. The Shakespearian Superman: A Study of The Tempest. The Crown of Life: Essays in Interpretation of Shakespeare’s Final Plays. London: Methuen; 1965. p. 203–255.
132.
Edwards P. Shakespeare’s Romances: 1900–1957. In: Nicoll A, editor. Shakespeare Survey 11. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1958. p. 1–18.
133.
Ryan K. Introduction. Shakespeare: The Last Plays. Longman; 1999. p. 4–12.
134.
Kay CM. An Overview of Critical Approaches to the Romances. Shakespeare’s Romances Reconsidered. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press; 1978.
135.
Strachey L. Shakespeare’s Final Period. Books and Characters: French and English. London: Chatto and Windus; 1922.
136.
Raleigh W. The Last Phase. Shakespeare. London: Macmillan; 1907.
137.
Greenblatt SJ. Martial Law in the Land of Cockaigne. Shakespearean Negotiations: The Circulation of Social Energy in Renaissance England. Oxford: Clarendon; 1988. p. 129–163.
138.
Wood N. Political Criticism at the Crossroads: The Utopian Historicism. The Tempest. Buckingham: Open University Press; 1995. p. 29–66.
139.
Brown P. This Thing of Darkness I Acknowledge Mine. Political Shakespeare: Essays in Cultural Materialism. 2nd Edition. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 1994. p. 48–71.
140.
Ryan K. Introduction. Shakespeare: The Last Plays. Longman; 1999. p. 1–21.
141.
Ryan K. "What Cares These Roarers for the Name of King?”: Language and Utopia in The Tempest. Shakespeare: The Last Plays [Internet]. Longman; 1999. p. 245–278. Available from: https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=1710649
142.
Hawkes T. Playhouse-Workhouse. That Shakespearian Rag: Essays on a Critical Process. London: Methuen; 1986. p. 1–26.
143.
Gillies J. Extract. Shakespeare and the Geography of Difference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1994. p. 140–155.
144.
Greenblatt S. Learning to Curse: Aspects of Linguistic Colonialism in the Sixteenth Century. Learning to Curse: Essays in Early Modern Culture. New York: Routledge; 1990. p. 22–51.
145.
Greenblatt S. Learning to Curse: Aspects of Linguistic Colonialism in the Sixteenth Century. Learning to Curse: Essays in Early Modern Culture [Internet]. New York: Routledge; 1990. p. 22–51. Available from: https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=1020235
146.
Clark S. The Tempest, or The Enchanted Island. Shakespeare Made Fit: Restoration Adaptations of Shakespeare. London: Everyman; 1997. p. 79–185.
147.
Dobson M. ‘Remember/First to Possess his Books’: The Appropriation of The Tempest 1700-1800. In: Wells S, editor. Shakespeare Survey 43 [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1991. p. 99–108. Available from: http://universitypublishingonline.org/ref/id/shakespeare/CBO9781139053204A012
148.
Maus KE. ‘Arcadia Host: Politics and Revision in the Restoration’ Tempest. Renaissance Drama [Internet]. The University of Chicago PressNorthwestern UniversityNorthwestern University; 1982;13:189–209. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/43264634
149.
Wikander MH. ‘The Duke my Father’s Wrack’: The Innocence of the Restoration Tempest. In: Wells S, editor. Shakespeare Survey 43 [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1991. p. 91–98. Available from: http://universitypublishingonline.org/ref/id/shakespeare/CBO9781139053204A011
150.
DiPietro C. Seeing Places: The Tempest and the Baroque Spectacle of the Restoration Theatre. Shakespeare. 2013;9(2):168–186.
151.
Nicholl A. Three Adaptations. In: Nicoll A, editor. Shakespeare Survey 13. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1960. p. 137–145.
152.
Browning R. Caliban Upon Setebos | Poetry Foundation [Internet]. Available from: https://web.archive.org/web/20170407155817/https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems-and-poets/poems/detail/43748
153.
Plath S. Full Fathom Five. The Colossus. London: Faber; 1967. p. 46–47.
154.
Plath S. Ariel. London: Faber; 1965.
155.
Plath S. Ariel | Poetry Foundation [Internet]. Available from: https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems-and-poets/poems/detail/49001
156.
Plath S. Full Fathom Five | Digital-Shakespeare [Internet]. Available from: http://digital-shakespeare.angelfire.com/fullfathomplath.html
157.
Hughes T. Setebos. Birthday Letters. London: Faber; 1998.
158.
Hughes T. Night-Ride on Ariel. Birthday Letters. London: Faber; 1998.
159.
Hughes T. Freedom of Speech. Birthday Letters. London: Faber; 1998.
160.
Hughes T. Setebos | Immrama [Internet]. 1998. Available from: http://immrama.blogspot.co.uk/2004/12/setebos-ted-hughes.html
161.
Shaw D. Extract. The Dialectical Temper: The Rhetorical Art of Robert Browning. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press; 1968. p. 193–203.
162.
Sawyer R. The Shakespeareanization of Robert Browning. Shakespeare and Appropriation. Routledge; 1999. p. 142–159.
163.
Desmet C. The Shakespeareanization of Robert Browning. Shakespeare and Appropriation [Internet]. London: Routledge; 1999. p. 142–159. Available from: https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=169306
164.
Slinn EW. Extract. Browning and the Fictions of Identity. London: Macmillan; 1982. p. 84–90.
165.
Wagner E. Ariel’s Gift: Ted Hughes, Sylvia Plath and the Story of Birthday Letters. New York: Norton; 2001.
166.
Rose J. The Haunting of Sylvia Plath. London: Virago; 1991.
167.
Malcolm J. Silent Woman: Sylvia Plath and Ted Hughes. Papermac; 1995.
168.
Kirsch A. Introduction and Commentary. The Sea and the Mirror: A Commentary on Shakespeare’s the Tempest. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press; 2003. p. xi–xliii.
169.
Auden WH. Balaam and his Ass: On the Literary Use of the Master-Servant Relationship. The Dyer’s Hand: And Other Essays. London: Faber; 1963. p. 107–145.
170.
Auden WH. Balaam and The Ass: On the Literary Use of the Master-Servant Relationship. Encounter [Internet]. 1954;(July):35–53. Available from: http://www.unz.org/Pub/Encounter-1954jul-00035
171.
Smith S. Extract. W H Auden. Oxford: Blackwell; 1985. p. 153–160.
172.
Fuller J. Extract. A Reader’s Guide to W H Auden. London: Thames & Hudson Ltd; 1970. p. 157–165.
173.
Greenberg H. Extract. Quest for the Necessary: W H Auden and the Dilemma of Divided Consciousness. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press; 1968. p. 122–141.
174.
McDowell FPW. The Sea and the Mirror. Auden: A Collection of Critical Essays. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall; 1964.
175.
Shakespeare W, Jarman D, Williams H. The Tempest. Second Sight; 1979.
176.
Greenaway P, Shakespeare W. Prospero’s Books. [Stockholm]: Atlantic Film; 2010.
177.
Buchanan J. Historically Juxtaposed Beans (II): The Tempest on Film. Shakespeare on Film. Harlow: Longman; 2005. p. 150–183.
178.
Buchanan J. The Tempest on Film. Shakespeare on Film [Internet]. Harlow, England: Pearson Longman; 2005. Available from: http://ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.myilibrary.com?id=177112
179.
Bulman JC. Drowning the Book: Prospero’s Books and the Textual Shakespeare. Shakespeare, Theory, and Performance [Internet]. London: Routledge; 1996. p. 189–212. Available from: https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=179529
180.
Bulman JC. Drowning the Book: Prospero’s Books and the Textual Shakespeare. Shakespeare, Theory and Performance. London: Routledge; 1996. p. 189–212.
181.
Shaughnessy R. A Post-National European Cinema: A Consideration of Derek Jarman’s The Tempest and Edward II. Shakespeare on Film. Macmillan; 1998. p. 145–155.
182.
Boose LE. Shakespeare in the Age of Post-Mechanical Reproduction: Sexual and Electronic Magic in Prospero’s Books. Shakespeare, The Movie: Popularizing the Plays on Film, TV and Video [Internet]. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis; 1997. p. 172–189. Available from: https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=240528
183.
Boose LE. Shakespeare in the Age of Post-Mechanical Reproduction: Sexual and Electronic Magic in Prospero’s Books. Shakespeare, the Movie: Popularizing the Plays on Film, TV and Video. London: Routledge; 1997. p. 172–189.
184.
Greenaway P. Prospero’s Books: A Film of Shakespeare’s the Tempest. London: Chatto & Windus; 1991.
185.
Shakespeare W, Taymor J. The Tempest | Box of Broadcasts [Internet]. 2010. Available from: https://learningonscreen.ac.uk/ondemand/index.php/prog/05A9694D?bcast=123986425
186.
Cartmell D. Shakespeare, Film and Race: Screening Othello and The Tempest. Interpreting Shakespeare on Screen [Internet]. New York: St. Martin’s Press; 2000. p. 67–93. Available from: https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/reader.action?docID=6234544&ppg=78
187.
Sibley-Esposito C. Becoming-Ariel: Viewing Julie Taymor’s The Tempest through an Ecocritical Lens. Babel. 2011;(24):121–134.
188.
Holderness G. Radical Potentiality and Institutional Closure: Shakespeare in Film and Television. Political Shakespeare: Essays in Cultural Materialism. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 1994. p. 206–225.
189.
Hopkins L. Shakespeare’s the Tempest: The Relationship Between Text and Film. London: Methuen Drama; 2008.
190.
Taymor J, Shakespeare W. The Tempest. New York: Abrams; 2010.