Adelman, Janet. ‘Suffocating Mothers in King Lear’. Suffocating Mothers: Fantasies of Maternal Origin in Shakespeare’s Plays, Hamlet to the Tempest. New York: Routledge, 1992. 103–129. Print.
---. ‘Suffocating Mothers in King Lear’. Suffocating Mothers: Fantasies of Maternal Origin in Shakespeare’s Plays, Hamlet to the Tempest. New York: Routledge, 1992. 103–129. Web. <https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=3060994>.
Auden, W. H. ‘Balaam and His Ass: On the Literary Use of the Master-Servant Relationship’. The Dyer’s Hand: And Other Essays. London: Faber, 1963. 107–145. Print.
---. ‘Balaam and The Ass: On the Literary Use of the Master-Servant Relationship’. Encounter July (1954): 35–53. Web. <http://www.unz.org/Pub/Encounter-1954jul-00035>.
Badawī, Muḥammad Muṣṭafá. Coleridge: Critic of Shakespeare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973. Print.
---. Coleridge: Critic of Shakespeare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973. Print.
Barker, Howard. A Style and Its Origins. London: Oberon Books, 2007. Print.
---. Arguments for a Theatre. 2nd Edition. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1993. Print.
---. Death, the One and the Art of Theatre. London: Routledge, 2005. Print.
---. Death, the One and the Art of Theatre. London: Routledge, 2005. Web. <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=199576>.
---. ‘Seven Lears: The Pursuit of Good’. Plays Five. London: Oberon Books, 2009. Print.
Bate, Jonathan. ‘All the World His Stage’. The Genius of Shakespeare. Picador Classic Edition. London: Picador Classic, 2016. 217–250. Print.
---. ‘Extract’. The Romantics on Shakespeare. New Penguin Shakespeare library. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1992. 60–66. Print.
---. ‘King Lear’. The Romantics on Shakespeare. New Penguin Shakespeare library. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1992. 381–405. Print.
---. Shakespeare and the English Romantic Imagination. Oxford: Clarendon, 1986. Print.
---. Shakespeare and the English Romantic Imagination. Oxford: Clarendon, 1986. Print.
---. Shakespearean Constitutions: Politics, Theatre, Criticism, 1730-1830. Oxford: Clarendon, 1989. Print.
---. Shakespearean Constitutions: Politics, Theatre, Criticism, 1730-1830. Oxford: Clarendon, 1989. Print.
---. ‘The Original Genius’. The Genius of Shakespeare. London: Picador, 1997. Print.
Bayley, John. ‘The King’s Ship’. Shakespeare and Tragedy. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1981. 7–48. Print.
Beckett, Samuel, and S. E. Gontarski. Endgame. The theatrical notebooks of Samuel Beckett. London: Faber and Faber, 1992. Print.
Berger, Harry. ‘King Lear: The Lear Family Romance’. Making Trifles of Terrors: Redistributing Complicities in Shakespeare. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press, 1997. Print.
---. ‘Text Against Performance:The Gloucester Family Romance’. Making Trifles of Terrors: Redistributing Complicities in Shakespeare. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press, 1997. Print.
Bloom, Harold. ‘King Lear’. Shakespeare: The Invention of the Human. London: Fourth Estate, 1999. 476–515. Print.
Bond, Edward. Bingo: Scenes of Money and Death. Methuen’s modern plays. London: Methuen, 1974. Print.
---. ‘Drama and the Dialectic of Violence’. Theatre Quarterly 2.5 (1972): 4–14. Print.
---. Lear. Ed. Patricia Hern. London: Bloomsbury, 1972. Web.
---. Plays: 2. London: Eyre Methuen, 1978. Print.
---. Plays: 3. London: Methuen, 1987. Print.
---. The Hidden Plot: Notes on Theatre and the State. London: Methuen Drama, 2000. Print.
---. The Hidden Plot: Notes on Theatre and the State. London: Methuen Drama, 2000. Print.
Boose, Lynda E. ‘Shakespeare in the Age of Post-Mechanical Reproduction: Sexual and Electronic Magic in Prospero’s Books’. Shakespeare, The Movie: Popularizing the Plays on Film, TV and Video. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis, 1997. 172–189. Web. <https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=240528>.
---. ‘Shakespeare in the Age of Post-Mechanical Reproduction: Sexual and Electronic Magic in Prospero’s Books’. Shakespeare, the Movie: Popularizing the Plays on Film, TV and Video. London: Routledge, 1997. 172–189. Print.
Booth, Stephen. ‘Extract’. King Lear, Macbeth, Indefinition and Tragedy. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1983. 5–57. Print.
Bradley, A. C. ‘“Lecture VII: King Lear” and “Lecture VIII: King Lear”’. Shakespearean Tragedy: Lectures on Hamlet, Othello, King Lear, Macbeth. 4th Edition. Houndsmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007. 182–210. Print.
---. ‘Lecture VIII: King Lear’. Shakespearean Tragedy: Lectures on Hamlet, Othello, King Lear, Macbeth. 4th Edition. Houndsmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007. 211–251. Print.
Braudy, Leo. ‘Finding Shakespeare on Film: From an Interview with Peter Brook’. Film Theory and Criticism: Introductory Readings. Ed. Leo Braudy and Marshall Cohen. 8th Edition. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016. Print.
Brauner, David. ‘“Speak Again”: The Politics of Rewriting in “A Thousand Acres”’. The Modern Language Review 96.3 (2001): 654–666. Web.
Brown, Paul. ‘This Thing of Darkness I Acknowledge Mine’. Political Shakespeare: Essays in Cultural Materialism. 2nd Edition. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1994. 48–71. Print.
Browning, Robert. ‘Caliban Upon Setebos | Poetry Foundation’. N.p., n.d. Web. <https://web.archive.org/web/20170407155817/https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems-and-poets/poems/detail/43748>.
Buchanan, Judith. ‘Historically Juxtaposed Beans (II): The Tempest on Film’. Shakespeare on Film. Inside film. Harlow: Longman, 2005. 150–183. Print.
---. ‘The Tempest on Film’. Shakespeare on Film. Harlow, England: Pearson Longman, 2005. Web. <http://ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.myilibrary.com?id=177112>.
Bulman, James C. ‘Drowning the Book: Prospero’s Books and the Textual Shakespeare’. Shakespeare, Theory, and Performance. London: Routledge, 1996. 189–212. Web. <https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=179529>.
---. ‘Drowning the Book: Prospero’s Books and the Textual Shakespeare’. Shakespeare, Theory and Performance. London: Routledge, 1996. 189–212. Print.
Cartelli, Thomas. ‘Shakespeare in Pain: Edward Bond’s Lear and the Ghosts of History’. Shakespeare Survey 55. Ed. Peter Holland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002. 159–169. Web. <http://universitypublishingonline.org/ref/id/shakespeare/CBO9781139052696A017>.
Cartmell, Deborah. ‘Shakespeare, Film and Race: Screening Othello and The Tempest’. Interpreting Shakespeare on Screen. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 2000. 67–93. Web. <https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/reader.action?docID=6234544&ppg=78>.
Clark, Sandra. ‘The Tempest, or The Enchanted Island’. Shakespeare Made Fit: Restoration Adaptations of Shakespeare. London: Everyman, 1997. 79–185. Print.
Crowl, Samuel. ‘The Bow Is Bent and Drawn: Kurosawa’s Ran and the Shakespearean Arrow of Desire.’ Literature Film Quarterly 22.2 (1994): 109–118. Web. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/43796627>.
Davies, Anthony. ‘Kurosawa’s Shakespeare Films: Throne of Blood, The Bad Sleep Well and Ran’. Shakespeare and the Moving Image: The Plays on Film and Television. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994. Print.
Desmet, Christy. ‘The Shakespeareanization of Robert Browning’. Shakespeare and Appropriation. London: Routledge, 1999. 142–159. Web. <https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=169306>.
DiPietro, Cary. ‘Seeing Places: The Tempest and the Baroque Spectacle of the Restoration Theatre’. Shakespeare 9.2 (2013): 168–186. Web.
Dobson, Michael. ‘“Remember/First to Possess His Books”: The Appropriation of The Tempest 1700-1800’. Shakespeare Survey 43. Ed. Stanley Wells. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991. 99–108. Web. <http://universitypublishingonline.org/ref/id/shakespeare/CBO9781139053204A012>.
Donohue, Joseph W. Dramatic Character in the English Romantic Age. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1970. Print.
Dutton, Richard. ‘King Lear’. A Companion to Shakespeare’s Works - Volume 1: The Tragedies. Oxford: Blackwell, 2006. 375–392. Print.
---. ‘King Lear’. A Companion to Shakespeare’s Works, Volume I: The Tragedies. Blackwell companions to literature and culture. Malden, Mass: Blackwell, 2003. 375–392. Web. <https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=350884>.
Edwards, Philip. ‘Shakespeare’s Romances: 1900–1957’. Shakespeare Survey 11. Ed. Allardyce Nicoll. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1958. 1–18. Web.
Evans, Malcolm. ‘Extract’. Signifying Nothing: Truth’s True Contents in Shakespeare’s Text. Brighton: Harvester, 1986. 224–234. Print.
Everett, Barbara. ‘The New King Lear’. Critical Quarterly 2.4 (1960): 325–339. Web.
Faragher, John Mack. ‘The Historical Imagination of A Thousand Acres’. Novel History: Historians and Novelists Confront America’s Past (And Each Other). N.p., 2001. 146–159. Print.
Field, Alan Sin. ‘King Lear Versus Lear at Stratford’. Critical Quarterly 24.4 (1982): 5–14. Web.
Foakes, R. A. ‘Introduction’. King Lear. New Edition. Arden Shakespeare.: Third series. Walton-on-Thames: Nelson, 1997. 1–110. Print.
---. ‘King Lear and Endgame’. Shakespeare Survey 55. Ed. Peter Holland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002. 153–158. Web. <http://universitypublishingonline.org/ref/id/shakespeare/CBO9781139052696A016>.
Fuller, John. ‘Extract’. A Reader’s Guide to W. H. Auden. London: Thames & Hudson Ltd, 1970. 157–165. Print.
Gillies, John. ‘Extract’. Shakespeare and the Geography of Difference. Cambridge studies in Renaissance literature and culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994. 140–155. Print.
Goldberg, Jonathan. ‘Perspectives: Dover Cliff and the Conditions of Representation’. King Lear, William Shakespeare. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1993. 145–157. Print.
Greenaway, Peter. Prospero’s Books: A Film of Shakespeare’s the Tempest. London: Chatto & Windus, 1991. Print.
Greenaway, Peter, and William Shakespeare. ‘Prospero’s Books’. 2010 : n. pag. Print.
Greenberg, Herbert. ‘Extract’. Quest for the Necessary: W. H. Auden and the Dilemma of Divided Consciousness. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1968. 122–141. Print.
Greenblatt, Stephen. ‘Learning to Curse: Aspects of Linguistic Colonialism in the Sixteenth Century’. Learning to Curse: Essays in Early Modern Culture. New York: Routledge, 1990. 22–51. Print.
---. ‘Learning to Curse: Aspects of Linguistic Colonialism in the Sixteenth Century’. Learning to Curse: Essays in Early Modern Culture. New York: Routledge, 1990. 22–51. Web. <https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=1020235>.
---. ‘Shakespeare and the Exorcists’. Shakespearean Negotiations: The Circulation of Social Energy in Renaissance England. Oxford: Clarendon, 1988. 94–128. Print.
---. ‘Shakespeare and the Exorcists’. Shakespearean Negotiations: The Circulation of Social Energy in Renaissance England. University of California Press, 1988. 94–128. Web. <https://hdl-handle-net.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/2027/heb09132.0001.001>.
Greenblatt, Stephen J. ‘Martial Law in the Land of Cockaigne’. Shakespearean Negotiations: The Circulation of Social Energy in Renaissance England. Oxford: Clarendon, 1988. 129–163. Print.
---. ‘The Cultivation of Anxiety: King Lear and His Heirs’. Learning to Curse: Essays in Early Modern Culture. New York: Routledge, 1990. 80–98. Print.
Gritzner, Karoline, and David Ian Rabey. Theatre of Catastrophe: New Essays on Howard Barker. London, 2006. Print.
Hawkes, Terence. ‘Playhouse-Workhouse’. That Shakespearian Rag: Essays on a Critical Process. London: Methuen, 1986. 1–26. Print.
Hay, Malcolm, and Philip Roberts. Bond: A Study of His Plays. Modern theatre profiles. London: Methuen, 1980. Print.
Hazlitt, William, and Arthur Quiller-Couch. ‘Lear’. Characters of Shakespeare’s Plays. The world’s classics. London: Humphrey Milford, 1939. Print.
Hibbard, G. R. ‘King Lear: A Retrospect, 1939–79’. Shakespeare Survey 33. Ed. Kenneth Muir. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981. 1–12. Web. <http://universitypublishingonline.org/ref/id/shakespeare/CBO9781139053105A004>.
---. ‘King Lear: A Retrospect, 1939–79’. Shakespeare Survey 33. Ed. Kenneth Muir. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981. 1–12. Web. <http://universitypublishingonline.org/ref/id/shakespeare/CBO9781139053105A004>.
Hirst, David L. Edward Bond. Macmillan modern dramatists. London: Macmillan, 1985. Print.
Hodgdon, Barbara. ‘Kozintsev’s King Lear: Filming a Tragic Poem’. Literature/Film Quarterly 5.4 (1977): 291–298. Web. <http://search.proquest.com/fiaf/docview/226982216/85C4A81B35A640C6PQ/5?accountid=11455>.
---. ‘Two King Lears: Uncovering the Filmtext’. Literature/Film Quarterly 11.3 (1983): 143–151. Web. <http://search.proquest.com/fiaf/docview/226985750/D5CF782E5FD7491CPQ/4?accountid=11455>.
Holderness, Graham. ‘Radical Potentiality and Institutional Closure: Shakespeare in Film and Television’. Political Shakespeare: Essays in Cultural Materialism. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1994. 206–225. Print.
Holland, Peter. ‘The Shapeliness of The Tempest’. Essays in Criticism XLV.3 (1995): 208–229. Web.
---. ‘Two‑Dimensional Shakespeare: King Lear on Film’. Shakespeare and the Moving Image: The Plays on Film and Television. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994. 50–68. Print.
Hopkins, Lisa. Shakespeare’s the Tempest: The Relationship Between Text and Film. Screen adaptations. London: Methuen Drama, 2008. Print.
Hughes, Ted. ‘Freedom of Speech’. Birthday Letters. London: Faber, 1998. Print.
---. ‘Night-Ride on Ariel’. Birthday Letters. London: Faber, 1998. Print.
---. ‘Setebos’. Birthday Letters. London: Faber, 1998. Print.
---. ‘Setebos | Immrama’. N.p., 1998. Web. <http://immrama.blogspot.co.uk/2004/12/setebos-ted-hughes.html>.
Hulme, Peter, and William H. Sherman. The Tempest: Sources and Contexts, Criticism, Rewritings and Appropriations. New York: W. W. Norton, 2004. Print.
Hunter, G.K. ‘The Play in Performance’. King Lear. London: Penguin, 2005. Print.
Irvine, Lindesay. ‘Podcast: Howard Barker Talks | Stage’. The Guardian (2006): n. pag. Web. <https://www.theguardian.com/stage/theatreblog/2006/dec/06/podcasthowardbarkertalks>.
Johnson, Samuel. ‘Extract’. Samuel Johnson on Shakespeare. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1989. 166–169. Print.
Jorgens, Jack J. ‘Chapter 10’. Shakespeare on Film. Lanham, Md: University Press of America, 1991. Print.
---. ‘Chapter 10’. Shakespeare on Film. Lanham, Md: University Press of America, 1991. Print.
Kahn, Coppélia. ‘The Absent Mother in King Lear’. King Lear, William Shakespeare. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1993. 92–113. Print.
Kay, Carol McGinnis. ‘An Overview of Critical Approaches to the Romances’. Shakespeare’s Romances Reconsidered. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1978. Print.
Keats, John. ‘On Sitting Down to Read King Lear Once Again | Poetry Foundation’. N.p., n.d. Web. <https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems-and-poets/poems/detail/44482>.
Kennedy, Dennis. ‘Introduction: Shakespeare Without His Language’. Foreign Shakespeare: Contemporary Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993. 1–18. Print.
---. ‘Shakespeare and the Visual’. Looking at Shakespeare: A Visual History of Twentieth-Century Performance. 2nd Edition. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001. Print.
Kermode, Frank. ‘Part 1: Early Comments and Critiques’. Shakespeare, King Lear: A Casebook. Revised Edition. Casebook series. Macmillan Education, 1992. 25–45. Print.
---. Shakespeare, King Lear: A Casebook. Rev. ed. Casebook series. Macmillan Educ, 1992. Print.
Kettle, Arnold. ‘From Hamlet to Lear’. Shakespeare in a Changing World: Essays. London: Lawrence & Wishart, 1964. 146–171. Print.
Kirsch, Arthur. ‘Introduction and Commentary’. The Sea and the Mirror: A Commentary on Shakespeare’s the Tempest. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2003. xi–xliii. Print.
Knight, G. Wilson. ‘King Lear and the Comedy of the Grotesque’. The Wheel of Fire: Interpretations of Shakespearean Tragedy, With Three New Essays. 4th Revised and Enlarged Edition. London: Routledge, 1989. 201–234. Print.
---. ‘King Lear and the Comedy of the Grotesque’. The Wheel of Fire: Interpretations of Shakespearian Tragedy. London: Routledge, 2001. 181–200. Web. <https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=240630>.
---. ‘King Lear and the Comedy of the Grotesque’. Shakespeare, King Lear: A Casebook. Revised Edition. Casebook series. Macmillan Educ, 1992. 107–122. Print.
---. ‘The Lear Universe’. The Wheel of Fire: Interpretations of Shakespearean Tragedy, With Three New Essays. 4th Revised and Enlarged Edition. London: Routledge, 1989. 181–200. Print.
---. ‘The Lear Universe’. The Wheel of Fire: Interpretations of Shakespearian Tragedy. Routledge classics. London: Routledge, 1989. 201–234. Web. <https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=240630>.
---. ‘The Shakespearian Superman: A Study of The Tempest’. The Crown of Life: Essays in Interpretation of Shakespeare’s Final Plays. University paperback. London: Methuen, 1965. 203–255. Print.
Ko, Yu Jin. ‘Shakespearean Characters and Early Modern Subjectivity: The Case of King Lear’. Shakespeare’s Sense of Character: On the Page and From the Stage. Studies in performance and early modern drama. Farnham, Surrey, England: Ashgate, 2012. 35–52. Print.
---. ‘Shakespearean Characters and Early Modern Subjectivity: The Case of King Lear’. Shakespeare’s Sense of Character: On the Page and From the Stage. Studies in performance and early modern drama. Farnham: Ashgate, 2012. 35–52. Web. <https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=4470669>.
Kott, Jan. ‘King Lear, or Endgame’. Shakespeare Our Contemporary. 2nd Revised Edition. University paperbacks. London: Methuen, 1967. 100–133. Print.
---. ‘King Lear, or Endgame’. Shakespeare: An Anthology of Criticism and Theory, 1945-2000. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub, 1967. 174–190. Print.
---. ‘King Lear, or Endgame’. Shakespeare Our Contemporary. 2nd Revised Edition. University paperbacks. London: Methuen, 1967. 100–133. Print.
---. ‘King Lear, or Endgame’. Shakespeare: An Anthology of Criticism and Theory, 1945-2000. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub, 1967. 174–190. Print.
---. ‘Prospero’s Staff’. Shakespeare Our Contemporary. 2nd Revised Edition. University paperbacks. London: Methuen, 1967. Print.
Kozintsev, Grigori M., and Mary Mackintosh. ‘King Lear’, the Space of Tragedy: The Diary of a Film Director. London: Heinemann Educational, 1977. Print.
Lamb, Charles. The Theatre of Howard Barker. Revised Edition. London: Routledge, 2005. Print.
Linton, Joan Pong. ‘Kurosawa’s Ran (1985) and Shakespeare’s King Lear: Towards a Conversation on Historical Responsibility’’. Quarterly Review of Film and Video 23.4 (2006): 341–351. Web.
Magnusson, A. Lynne. ‘Interruption in “The Tempest”’. Shakespeare Quarterly 37.1 (1986): 52–65. Web.
Malcolm, Janet. Silent Woman: Sylvia Plath and Ted Hughes. Papermac, 1995. Print.
Marcus, Leah S. ‘Retrospective: King Lear on St Stephen’s Night, 1606’. Puzzling Shakespeare: Local Reading and Its Discontents. The new historicism. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988. 148–159. Print.
Maus, Katharine Eisaman. ‘“Arcadia Host: Politics and Revision in the Restoration” Tempest’. Renaissance Drama 13 (1982): 189–209. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/43264634>.
McDonald, Russ. ‘Reading The Tempest’. Shakespeare Survey 43. Ed. Stanley Wells. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991. 15–28. Web.
---. Shakespeare: An Anthology of Criticism and Theory, 1945-2000. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub, 2004. Print.
---. ‘The "New Criticism” and King Lear’. Shakespeare: An Anthology of Criticism and Theory, 1945-2000. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub, 2004. 63–88. Print.
McDowell, Frederick P. W. ‘The Sea and the Mirror’. Auden: A Collection of Critical Essays. Twentieth century views. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1964. Print.
Moorhouse, Jocelyn. ‘A Thousand Acres’. 2006 : n. pag. Print.
Neill, Michael. ‘“Noises, / Sounds, and Sweet Airs”: The Burden of Shakespeare’s “Tempest”’. Shakespeare Quarterly 59.1 (2008): 36–59. Web. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/40210245>.
Nicholl, Allardyce. ‘Three Adaptations’. Shakespeare Survey 13. Ed. Allardyce Nicoll. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1960. 137–145. Print.
Nodelman, Perry. ‘Beyond Politics in Bond’s Lear’. Modern Drama 23.3 (1980): 269–276. Web.
Novy, Marianne. ‘King Lear and A Thousand Acres: Gender, Genre and the Revisionary Impulse’. Transforming Shakespeare: Twentieth-Century Women’s Re-Visions. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1999. Print.
---. ‘The Polluted Quarry: Nature and Body in A Thousand Acres’. Transforming Shakespeare: Twentieth-Century Women’s Re-Visions. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1999. Print.
Orgel, Stephen. ‘Introduction’. The Tempest. Oxford: Clarendon, 1987. Web. <https://www-oxfordscholarlyeditions-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/display/10.1093/actrade/9780198129172.book.1/actrade-9780198129172-book-1>.
Palmer, D. J. ‘Extract’. Shakespeare, The Tempest: A Casebook. Casebook series. London: Macmillan, 1968. 34–71. Print.
---. ‘Shakespeare’s Dream’. Shakespeare, the Tempest: A Casebook. Casebook series. London: Macmillan, 1968. 109–129. Print.
Palmer, D.J. ‘Introduction to The Tempest’. Shakespeare, the Tempest: A Casebook. Casebook series. London: Macmillan, 1967. Print.
Parker, G. F. Johnson’s Shakespeare. Oxford: Clarendon, 1989. Print.
---. Johnson’s Shakespeare. Oxford: Clarendon, 1989. Print.
Patterson, Annabell M. ‘"What Matter Who’s Speaking?”: Hamlet and King Lear’. Shakespeare and the Popular Voice. N.p., 1989. 93–119. Print.
Plath, Sylvia. Ariel. London: Faber, 1965. Print.
---. ‘Ariel | Poetry Foundation’. N.p., n.d. Web. <https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems-and-poets/poems/detail/49001>.
---. ‘Full Fathom Five’. The Colossus. London: Faber, 1967. 46–47. Print.
---. ‘Full Fathom Five | Digital-Shakespeare’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://digital-shakespeare.angelfire.com/fullfathomplath.html>.
Rabey, David Ian. Howard Baker: Ecstasy and Death: An Expository Study of His Plays and Production Work, 1988-2008. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008. Print.
Raleigh, Walter. ‘The Last Phase’. Shakespeare. English men of letters. London: Macmillan, 1907. Print.
Rose, Jacqueline. The Haunting of Sylvia Plath. London: Virago, 1991. Print.
Ryan, Kiernan. ‘Introduction’. King Lear. Penguin Shakespeare. London: Penguin, 2005. xxi–lxiv. Print.
---. ‘Introduction’. Shakespeare: The Last Plays. Longman Critical Readers. Longman, 1999. 4–12. Print.
---. ‘Introduction’. Shakespeare: The Last Plays. Longman Critical Readers. Longman, 1999. 1–21. Print.
---. ‘The Tempest: The Complicities of Art’. Shakespeare. 3rd Edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2002. Print.
---. ‘The Tempest: The Complicities of Art’. Shakespeare. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave, 2002. Web. <https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=5297581>.
---. ‘"What Cares These Roarers for the Name of King?”: Language and Utopia in The Tempest’. Shakespeare: The Last Plays. Longman Critical Readers. Longman, 1999. 245–278. Web. <https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=1710649>.
Sawyer, Robert. ‘Remembering King Lear in Jane Smiley’s A Thousand Acres’. Shakespeare and Appropriation. Accents on Shakespeare. Routledge, 1999. 85–102. Print.
---. ‘Remembering King Lear in Jane Smiley’s A Thousand Acres’. Shakespeare and Appropriation. London: Routledge, 1999. 85–102. Web. <https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=169306>.
---. ‘The Shakespeareanization of Robert Browning’. Shakespeare and Appropriation. Accents on Shakespeare. Routledge, 1999. 142–159. Print.
Shakespeare, William. King Lear. Ed. R. A. Foakes. New Edition. Arden Shakespeare.: Third series. Walton-on-Thames: Nelson, 1997. Print.
Shakespeare, William, George Hunter, and Kiernan Ryan. ‘The Popular Voice of King Lear’. King Lear: Contemporary Critical Essays. Penguin Shakespeare. London: Penguin, 2005. 130–144. Print.
Shakespeare, William, Derek Jarman, and Heathcote Williams. ‘The Tempest’. 1979 : n. pag. Print.
Shakespeare, William, and Stephen Orgel. The Tempest. Oxford: Clarendon, 1987. Web. <https://www-oxfordscholarlyeditions-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/display/10.1093/actrade/9780198129172.book.1/actrade-9780198129172-book-1>.
Shakespeare, William, and Julie Taymor. ‘The Tempest | Box of Broadcasts’. 2010. Web. <https://learningonscreen.ac.uk/ondemand/index.php/prog/05A9694D?bcast=123986425>.
Shaughnessy, Robert. ‘A Post-National European Cinema: A Consideration of Derek Jarman’s The Tempest and Edward II’. Shakespeare on Film. New Casebooks. Macmillan, 1998. 145–155. Print.
Shaw, David. ‘Extract’. The Dialectical Temper: The Rhetorical Art of Robert Browning. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1968. 193–203. Print.
Sibley-Esposito, Clare. ‘Becoming-Ariel: Viewing Julie Taymor’s The Tempest through an Ecocritical Lens’. Babel 24 (2011): 121–134. Web.
Sinfield, Alan. ‘The Patriarchal Bard: Feminist Criticism and Shakespeare: King Lear and Measure for Measure’. Political Shakespeare: Essays in Cultural Materialism. 2nd Edition. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1994. 88–108. Print.
Slinn, E. Warwick. ‘Extract’. Browning and the Fictions of Identity. London: Macmillan, 1982. 84–90. Print.
Smiley, Jane. A Thousand Acres. London: Flamingo, 1992. Print.
Smith, Stan. ‘Extract’. W. H. Auden. Rereading literature. Oxford: Blackwell, 1985. 153–160. Print.
Sokolyansky, Mark. ‘Grigori Kozintsev’s Hamlet and King Lear’. The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare on Film. 2nd Edition. Cambridge companions to literature The Cambridge companion to Shakespeare on film. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007. 203–215. Print.
---. ‘Grigori Kozintsev’s Hamlet and King Lear’. The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare on Film. Cambridge Companions to Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007. 203–215. Web. <http://ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521866006>.
Strachey, Lytton. ‘Shakespeare’s Final Period’. Books and Characters: French and English. London: Chatto and Windus, 1922. Print.
Taylor, Michael. Shakespeare Criticism in the Twentieth Century. Oxford Shakespeare Topics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. Print.
Taymor, Julie, and William Shakespeare. The Tempest. New York: Abrams, 2010. Print.
Thompson, Ann. King Lear. The critics debate. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1988. Print.
Vickers, Brian. Shakespeare, the Critical Heritage - Volume 1, 1623-1692. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1974. Print.
---. Shakespeare, the Critical Heritage - Volume 2, 1693-1733. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1974. Print.
---. Shakespeare, the Critical Heritage - Volume 3, 1733-1752. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1975. Print.
---. Shakespeare, the Critical Heritage - Volume 4, 1753-1765. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1976. Print.
---. Shakespeare, the Critical Heritage - Volume 5, 1765-1774. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1979. Print.
---. Shakespeare, the Critical Heritage - Volume 6, 1774-1801. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1981. Print.
---. Shakespeare: The Critical Heritage 1623-1801. The Critical Heritage Series. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1981. Print.
Wagner, Erica. Ariel’s Gift: Ted Hughes, Sylvia Plath and the Story of Birthday Letters. New York: Norton, 2001. Print.
Wikander, Matthew H. ‘“The Duke My Father’s Wrack”: The Innocence of the Restoration Tempest’. Shakespeare Survey 43. Ed. Stanley Wells. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991. 91–98. Web. <http://universitypublishingonline.org/ref/id/shakespeare/CBO9781139053204A011>.
Wood, Nigel. ‘Political Criticism at the Crossroads: The Utopian Historicism’. The Tempest. Theory in practice series. Buckingham: Open University Press, 1995. 29–66. Print.
Woudhuysen, H.R. ‘Notes on King Lear’. Samuel Johnson on Shakespeare. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1989. 219–223. Print.
Yachnin, P. E. ‘The Properties of Character in King Lear’. Shakespeare and Character: Theory, History, Performance, and Theatrical Persons. Palgrave Shakespeare studies. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009. 98–116. Print.
Zimmerman, Susan. ‘Perspectives: Dover Cliff and the Conditions of Representation’. Shakespeare’s Tragedies. New casebooks. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1998. 155–166. Print.
