[1]
W. Shakespeare, King Lear, New Edition., vol. Arden Shakespeare.: Third series. Walton-on-Thames: Nelson, 1997.
[2]
K. Ryan, ‘Introduction’, in King Lear, vol. Penguin Shakespeare, London: Penguin, 2005, pp. xxi–lxiv.
[3]
G. K. Hunter, ‘The Play in Performance’, in King Lear, London: Penguin, 2005.
[4]
R. A. Foakes, ‘Introduction’, in King Lear, New Edition., vol. Arden Shakespeare.: Third series, Walton-on-Thames: Nelson, 1997, pp. 1–110.
[5]
H. Bloom, ‘King Lear’, in Shakespeare: The Invention of the Human, London: Fourth Estate, 1999, pp. 476–515.
[6]
J. Bayley, ‘The King’s Ship’, in Shakespeare and Tragedy, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1981, pp. 7–48.
[7]
S. Booth, ‘Extract’, in King Lear, Macbeth, Indefinition and Tragedy, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1983, pp. 5–57.
[8]
H. Berger, ‘King Lear: The Lear Family Romance’, in Making Trifles of Terrors: Redistributing Complicities in Shakespeare, Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press, 1997.
[9]
H. Berger, ‘Text Against Performance:The Gloucester Family Romance’, in Making Trifles of Terrors: Redistributing Complicities in Shakespeare, Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press, 1997.
[10]
H. R. Woudhuysen, ‘Notes on King Lear’, in Samuel Johnson on Shakespeare, Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1989, pp. 219–223.
[11]
J. Bate, ‘King Lear’, in The Romantics on Shakespeare, vol. New Penguin Shakespeare library, Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1992, pp. 381–405.
[12]
W. Hazlitt and A. Quiller-Couch, ‘Lear’, in Characters of Shakespeare’s Plays, vol. The world’s classics, London: Humphrey Milford, 1939.
[13]
J. Keats, ‘On Sitting Down to Read King Lear Once Again | Poetry Foundation’. [Online]. Available: https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems-and-poets/poems/detail/44482
[14]
F. Kermode, ‘Part 1: Early Comments and Critiques’, in Shakespeare, King Lear: A Casebook, Revised Edition., vol. Casebook series, Macmillan Education, 1992, pp. 25–45.
[15]
G. F. Parker, Johnson’s Shakespeare. Oxford: Clarendon, 1989.
[16]
J. Bate, ‘The Original Genius’, in The Genius of Shakespeare, London: Picador, 1997.
[17]
J. Bate, ‘All the World His Stage’, in The Genius of Shakespeare, Picador Classic Edition., London: Picador Classic, 2016, pp. 217–250.
[18]
J. Bate, Shakespeare and the English Romantic Imagination. Oxford: Clarendon, 1986.
[19]
J. Bate, Shakespearean Constitutions: Politics, Theatre, Criticism, 1730-1830. Oxford: Clarendon, 1989.
[20]
M. M. Badawī, Coleridge: Critic of Shakespeare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973.
[21]
B. Vickers, Shakespeare: The Critical Heritage 1623-1801, vol. The Critical Heritage Series. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1981.
[22]
A. C. Bradley, ‘“Lecture VII: King Lear” and “Lecture VIII: King Lear”’, in Shakespearean Tragedy: Lectures on Hamlet, Othello, King Lear, Macbeth, 4th Edition., Houndsmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007, pp. 182–210.
[23]
A. C. Bradley, ‘Lecture VIII: King Lear’, in Shakespearean Tragedy: Lectures on Hamlet, Othello, King Lear, Macbeth, 4th Edition., Houndsmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007, pp. 211–251.
[24]
F. Kermode, Shakespeare, King Lear: A Casebook, Rev. ed., vol. Casebook series. Macmillan Educ, 1992.
[25]
G. W. Knight, ‘King Lear and the Comedy of the Grotesque’, in The Wheel of Fire: Interpretations of Shakespearean Tragedy, With Three New Essays, 4th Revised and Enlarged Edition., London: Routledge, 1989, pp. 201–234.
[26]
G. W. Knight, ‘King Lear and the Comedy of the Grotesque’, in The Wheel of Fire: Interpretations of Shakespearian Tragedy, London: Routledge, 2001, pp. 181–200 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=240630
[27]
G. W. Knight, ‘The Lear Universe’, in The Wheel of Fire: Interpretations of Shakespearean Tragedy, With Three New Essays, 4th Revised and Enlarged Edition., London: Routledge, 1989, pp. 181–200.
[28]
G. W. Knight, ‘The Lear Universe’, in The Wheel of Fire: Interpretations of Shakespearian Tragedy, vol. Routledge classics, London: Routledge, 1989, pp. 201–234 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=240630
[29]
G. W. Knight, ‘King Lear and the Comedy of the Grotesque’, in Shakespeare, King Lear: A Casebook, Revised Edition., vol. Casebook series, Macmillan Educ, 1992, pp. 107–122.
[30]
J. Kott, ‘King Lear, or Endgame’, in Shakespeare Our Contemporary, 2nd Revised Edition., vol. University paperbacks, London: Methuen, 1967, pp. 100–133.
[31]
J. Kott, ‘King Lear, or Endgame’, in Shakespeare: An Anthology of Criticism and Theory, 1945-2000, Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub, 1967, pp. 174–190.
[32]
A. Kettle, ‘From Hamlet to Lear’, in Shakespeare in a Changing World: Essays, London: Lawrence & Wishart, 1964, pp. 146–171.
[33]
R. McDonald, Shakespeare: An Anthology of Criticism and Theory, 1945-2000. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub, 2004.
[34]
G. R. Hibbard, ‘King Lear: A Retrospect, 1939–79’, in Shakespeare Survey 33, K. Muir, Ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981, pp. 1–12 [Online]. Available: http://universitypublishingonline.org/ref/id/shakespeare/CBO9781139053105A004
[35]
A. Thompson, King Lear, vol. The critics debate. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1988.
[36]
R. McDonald, ‘The "New Criticism” and King Lear’, in Shakespeare: An Anthology of Criticism and Theory, 1945-2000, Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub, 2004, pp. 63–88.
[37]
B. Everett, ‘The New King Lear’, Critical Quarterly, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 325–339, 1960, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8705.1960.tb00882.x.
[38]
S. Beckett and S. E. Gontarski, Endgame, vol. The theatrical notebooks of Samuel Beckett. London: Faber and Faber, 1992.
[39]
R. A. Foakes, ‘King Lear and Endgame’, in Shakespeare Survey 55, P. Holland, Ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002, pp. 153–158 [Online]. Available: http://universitypublishingonline.org/ref/id/shakespeare/CBO9781139052696A016
[40]
M. Taylor, Shakespeare Criticism in the Twentieth Century, vol. Oxford Shakespeare Topics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
[41]
S. Greenblatt, ‘Shakespeare and the Exorcists’, in Shakespearean Negotiations: The Circulation of Social Energy in Renaissance England, Oxford: Clarendon, 1988, pp. 94–128.
[42]
S. Greenblatt, ‘Shakespeare and the Exorcists’, in Shakespearean Negotiations: The Circulation of Social Energy in Renaissance England, University of California Press, 1988, pp. 94–128 [Online]. Available: https://hdl-handle-net.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/2027/heb09132.0001.001
[43]
C. Kahn, ‘The Absent Mother in King Lear’, in King Lear, William Shakespeare, Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1993, pp. 92–113.
[44]
J. Goldberg, ‘Perspectives: Dover Cliff and the Conditions of Representation’, in King Lear, William Shakespeare, Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1993, pp. 145–157.
[45]
S. Zimmerman, ‘Perspectives: Dover Cliff and the  Conditions of Representation’, in Shakespeare’s Tragedies, vol. New casebooks, Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1998, pp. 155–166.
[46]
R. Dutton, ‘King Lear’, in A Companion to Shakespeare’s Works - Volume 1: The Tragedies, Oxford: Blackwell, 2006, pp. 375–392.
[47]
R. Dutton, ‘King Lear’, in A Companion to Shakespeare’s Works, Volume I: The Tragedies, vol. Blackwell companions to literature and culture, Malden, Mass: Blackwell, 2003, pp. 375–392 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=350884
[48]
G. R. Hibbard, ‘King Lear: A Retrospect, 1939–79’, in Shakespeare Survey 33, K. Muir, Ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981, pp. 1–12 [Online]. Available: http://universitypublishingonline.org/ref/id/shakespeare/CBO9781139053105A004
[49]
A. M. Patterson, ‘"What Matter Who’s Speaking?”: Hamlet and King Lear’, in Shakespeare and the Popular Voice, 1989, pp. 93–119.
[50]
W. Shakespeare, G. Hunter, and K. Ryan, ‘The Popular Voice of King Lear’, in King Lear: Contemporary Critical Essays, vol. Penguin Shakespeare, London: Penguin, 2005, pp. 130–144.
[51]
J. Adelman, ‘Suffocating Mothers in King Lear’, in Suffocating Mothers: Fantasies of Maternal Origin in Shakespeare’s Plays, Hamlet to the Tempest, New York: Routledge, 1992, pp. 103–129.
[52]
J. Adelman, ‘Suffocating Mothers in King Lear’, in Suffocating Mothers: Fantasies of Maternal Origin in Shakespeare’s Plays, Hamlet to the Tempest, New York: Routledge, 1992, pp. 103–129 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=3060994
[53]
S. J. Greenblatt, ‘The Cultivation of Anxiety: King Lear and His Heirs’, in Learning to Curse: Essays in Early Modern Culture, New York: Routledge, 1990, pp. 80–98.
[54]
M. Evans, ‘Extract’, in Signifying Nothing: Truth’s True Contents in Shakespeare’s Text, Brighton: Harvester, 1986, pp. 224–234.
[55]
L. S. Marcus, ‘Retrospective: King Lear on St Stephen’s Night, 1606’, in Puzzling Shakespeare: Local Reading and Its Discontents, vol. The new historicism, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988, pp. 148–159.
[56]
A. Sinfield, ‘The Patriarchal Bard: Feminist Criticism and Shakespeare: King Lear and Measure for Measure’, in Political Shakespeare: Essays in Cultural Materialism, 2nd Edition., Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1994, pp. 88–108.
[57]
P. E. Yachnin, ‘The Properties of Character in King Lear’, in Shakespeare and Character: Theory, History, Performance, and Theatrical Persons, vol. Palgrave Shakespeare studies, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009, pp. 98–116.
[58]
Y. J. Ko, ‘Shakespearean Characters and Early Modern Subjectivity: The Case of King Lear’, in Shakespeare’s Sense of Character: On the Page and From the Stage, vol. Studies in performance and early modern drama, Farnham, Surrey, England: Ashgate, 2012, pp. 35–52.
[59]
Y. J. Ko, ‘Shakespearean Characters and Early Modern Subjectivity: The Case of King Lear’, in Shakespeare’s Sense of Character: On the Page and From the Stage, vol. Studies in performance and early modern drama, Farnham: Ashgate, 2012, pp. 35–52 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=4470669
[60]
E. Bond, Lear. London: Bloomsbury, 1972.
[61]
E. Bond, Plays: 2. London: Eyre Methuen, 1978.
[62]
T. Cartelli, ‘Shakespeare in Pain: Edward Bond’s Lear and the Ghosts of History’, in Shakespeare Survey 55, P. Holland, Ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002, pp. 159–169 [Online]. Available: http://universitypublishingonline.org/ref/id/shakespeare/CBO9781139052696A017
[63]
A. S. Field, ‘King Lear Versus Lear at Stratford’, Critical Quarterly, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 5–14, 1982, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8705.1982.tb01893.x.
[64]
E. Bond, ‘Drama and the Dialectic of Violence’, Theatre Quarterly, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 4–14, 1972.
[65]
P. Nodelman, ‘Beyond Politics in Bond’s Lear’, Modern Drama, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 269–276, 1980, doi: 10.1353/mdr.1980.0011.
[66]
E. Bond, Bingo: Scenes of Money and Death, vol. Methuen’s modern plays. London: Methuen, 1974.
[67]
E. Bond, Plays: 3. London: Methuen, 1987.
[68]
E. Bond, The Hidden Plot: Notes on Theatre and the State. London: Methuen Drama, 2000.
[69]
E. Bond, The Hidden Plot: Notes on Theatre and the State. London: Methuen Drama, 2000.
[70]
M. Hay and P. Roberts, Bond: A Study of His Plays, vol. Modern theatre profiles. London: Methuen, 1980.
[71]
D. L. Hirst, Edward Bond, vol. Macmillan modern dramatists. London: Macmillan, 1985.
[72]
H. Barker, ‘Seven Lears: The Pursuit of Good’, in Plays Five, London: Oberon Books, 2009.
[73]
H. Barker, Arguments for a Theatre, 2nd Edition. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1993.
[74]
H. Barker, A Style and Its Origins. London: Oberon Books, 2007.
[75]
D. I. Rabey, Howard Baker: Ecstasy and Death: An Expository Study of His Plays and Production Work, 1988-2008. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.
[76]
H. Barker, Death, the One and the Art of Theatre. London: Routledge, 2005.
[77]
H. Barker, Death, the One and the Art of Theatre. London: Routledge, 2005 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=199576
[78]
C. Lamb, The Theatre of Howard Barker, Revised Edition. London: Routledge, 2005.
[79]
K. Gritzner and D. I. Rabey, Theatre of Catastrophe: New Essays on Howard Barker. London, 2006.
[80]
L. Irvine, ‘Podcast: Howard Barker talks | Stage’, The Guardian, Dec. 2006 [Online]. Available: https://www.theguardian.com/stage/theatreblog/2006/dec/06/podcasthowardbarkertalks
[81]
J. Smiley, A Thousand Acres. London: Flamingo, 1992.
[82]
D. Brauner, ‘“Speak Again”: The Politics of Rewriting in “A Thousand Acres”’, The Modern Language Review, vol. 96, no. 3, pp. 654–666, 2001, doi: 10.2307/3736736.
[83]
R. Sawyer, ‘Remembering King Lear in Jane Smiley’s A Thousand Acres’, in Shakespeare and Appropriation, vol. Accents on Shakespeare, Routledge, 1999, pp. 85–102.
[84]
R. Sawyer, ‘Remembering King Lear in Jane Smiley’s A Thousand Acres’, in Shakespeare and Appropriation, London: Routledge, 1999, pp. 85–102 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=169306
[85]
M. Novy, ‘King Lear and A Thousand Acres: Gender, Genre and the Revisionary Impulse’, in Transforming Shakespeare: Twentieth-Century Women’s Re-Visions, Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1999.
[86]
M. Novy, ‘The Polluted Quarry: Nature and Body in A Thousand Acres’, in Transforming Shakespeare: Twentieth-Century Women’s Re-Visions, Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1999.
[87]
J. M. Faragher, ‘The Historical Imagination of A Thousand Acres’, in Novel History: Historians and Novelists Confront America’s Past (And Each Other), 2001, pp. 146–159.
[88]
J. Moorhouse, ‘A Thousand Acres’. Universal, 2006.
[89]
J. Kott, ‘King Lear, or Endgame’, in Shakespeare Our Contemporary, 2nd Revised Edition., vol. University paperbacks, London: Methuen, 1967, pp. 100–133.
[90]
J. Kott, ‘King Lear, or Endgame’, in Shakespeare: An Anthology of Criticism and Theory, 1945-2000, Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub, 1967, pp. 174–190.
[91]
P. Holland, ‘Two‑Dimensional Shakespeare: King Lear on Film’, in Shakespeare and the Moving Image: The Plays on Film and Television, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994, pp. 50–68.
[92]
B. Hodgdon, ‘Two King Lears: Uncovering the Filmtext’, Literature/Film Quarterly, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 143–151, 1983 [Online]. Available: http://search.proquest.com/fiaf/docview/226985750/D5CF782E5FD7491CPQ/4?accountid=11455
[93]
M. Sokolyansky, ‘Grigori Kozintsev’s Hamlet and King Lear’, in The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare on Film, 2nd Edition., vol. Cambridge companions to literature The Cambridge companion to Shakespeare on film, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007, pp. 203–215.
[94]
M. Sokolyansky, ‘Grigori Kozintsev’s Hamlet and King Lear’, in The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare on Film, vol. Cambridge Companions to Literature, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007, pp. 203–215 [Online]. Available: http://ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521866006
[95]
B. Hodgdon, ‘Kozintsev’s King Lear: Filming a Tragic Poem’, Literature/Film Quarterly, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 291–298, 1977 [Online]. Available: http://search.proquest.com/fiaf/docview/226982216/85C4A81B35A640C6PQ/5?accountid=11455
[96]
L. Braudy, ‘Finding Shakespeare on Film: From an Interview with Peter Brook’, in Film Theory and Criticism: Introductory Readings, 8th Edition., L. Braudy and M. Cohen, Eds. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016.
[97]
J. J. Jorgens, ‘Chapter 10’, in Shakespeare on Film, Lanham, Md: University Press of America, 1991.
[98]
G. M. Kozintsev and M. Mackintosh, ‘King Lear’, the Space of Tragedy: The Diary of a Film Director. London: Heinemann Educational, 1977.
[99]
D. Kennedy, ‘Introduction: Shakespeare Without His Language’, in Foreign Shakespeare: Contemporary Performance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993, pp. 1–18.
[100]
A. Davies, ‘Kurosawa’s Shakespeare Films: Throne of Blood, The Bad Sleep Well and Ran’, in Shakespeare and the Moving Image: The Plays on Film and Television, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
[101]
J. P. Linton, ‘Kurosawa’s Ran (1985) and Shakespeare’s King Lear: Towards a Conversation on Historical Responsibility’’, Quarterly Review of Film and Video, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 341–351, 2006, doi: 10.1080/10509200690897608.
[102]
S. Crowl, ‘The Bow Is Bent and Drawn: Kurosawa’s Ran and the Shakespearean Arrow of Desire.’, Literature Film Quarterly, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 109–118, 1994 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/43796627
[103]
J. J. Jorgens, ‘Chapter 10’, in Shakespeare on Film, Lanham, Md: University Press of America, 1991.
[104]
D. Kennedy, ‘Shakespeare and the Visual’, in Looking at Shakespeare: A Visual History of Twentieth-Century Performance, 2nd Edition., New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
[105]
W. Shakespeare and S. Orgel, The Tempest. Oxford: Clarendon, 1987 [Online]. Available: https://www-oxfordscholarlyeditions-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/display/10.1093/actrade/9780198129172.book.1/actrade-9780198129172-book-1
[106]
P. Hulme and W. H. Sherman, The Tempest: Sources and Contexts, Criticism, Rewritings and Appropriations. New York: W. W. Norton, 2004.
[107]
S. Orgel, ‘Introduction’, in The Tempest, Oxford: Clarendon, 1987 [Online]. Available: https://www-oxfordscholarlyeditions-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/display/10.1093/actrade/9780198129172.book.1/actrade-9780198129172-book-1
[108]
R. McDonald, ‘Reading The Tempest’, in Shakespeare Survey 43, S. Wells, Ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991, pp. 15–28.
[109]
P. Holland, ‘The Shapeliness of The Tempest’, Essays in Criticism, vol. XLV, no. 3, pp. 208–229, 1995, doi: 10.1093/eic/XLV.3.208.
[110]
M. Neill, ‘“Noises, / Sounds, and Sweet Airs”: The Burden of Shakespeare’s “Tempest”’, Shakespeare Quarterly, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 36–59, 2008 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/40210245
[111]
A. L. Magnusson, ‘Interruption in “The Tempest”’, Shakespeare Quarterly, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 52–65, 1986, doi: 10.2307/2870191.
[112]
J. Kott, ‘Prospero’s Staff’, in Shakespeare Our Contemporary, 2nd Revised Edition., vol. University paperbacks, London: Methuen, 1967.
[113]
K. Ryan, ‘The Tempest: The Complicities of Art’, in Shakespeare, 3rd Edition., Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2002.
[114]
K. Ryan, ‘The Tempest: The Complicities of Art’, in Shakespeare, Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave, 2002 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=5297581
[115]
D. J. Palmer, ‘Extract’, in Shakespeare, The Tempest: A Casebook, vol. Casebook series, London: Macmillan, 1968, pp. 34–71.
[116]
S. Johnson, ‘Extract’, in Samuel Johnson on Shakespeare, Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1989, pp. 166–169.
[117]
J. Bate, ‘Extract’, in The Romantics on Shakespeare, vol. New Penguin Shakespeare library, Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1992, pp. 60–66.
[118]
G. F. Parker, Johnson’s Shakespeare. Oxford: Clarendon, 1989.
[119]
J. W. Donohue, Dramatic Character in the English Romantic Age. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1970.
[120]
M. M. Badawī, Coleridge: Critic of Shakespeare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973.
[121]
J. Bate, Shakespeare and the English Romantic Imagination. Oxford: Clarendon, 1986.
[122]
J. Bate, Shakespearean Constitutions: Politics, Theatre, Criticism, 1730-1830. Oxford: Clarendon, 1989.
[123]
B. Vickers, Shakespeare, the Critical Heritage - Volume 1, 1623-1692. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1974.
[124]
B. Vickers, Shakespeare, the Critical Heritage - Volume 2, 1693-1733. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1974.
[125]
B. Vickers, Shakespeare, the Critical Heritage - Volume 3, 1733-1752. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1975.
[126]
B. Vickers, Shakespeare, the Critical Heritage - Volume 4, 1753-1765. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1976.
[127]
B. Vickers, Shakespeare, the Critical Heritage - Volume 5, 1765-1774. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1979.
[128]
B. Vickers, Shakespeare, the Critical Heritage - Volume 6, 1774-1801. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1981.
[129]
D. J. Palmer, ‘Introduction to The Tempest’, in Shakespeare, the Tempest: A Casebook, vol. Casebook series, London: Macmillan, 1967.
[130]
D. J. Palmer, ‘Shakespeare’s Dream’, in Shakespeare, the Tempest: A Casebook, vol. Casebook series, London: Macmillan, 1968, pp. 109–129.
[131]
G. W. Knight, ‘The Shakespearian Superman: A Study of The Tempest’, in The Crown of Life: Essays in Interpretation of Shakespeare’s Final Plays, vol. University paperback, London: Methuen, 1965, pp. 203–255.
[132]
P. Edwards, ‘Shakespeare’s Romances: 1900–1957’, in Shakespeare Survey 11, A. Nicoll, Ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1958, pp. 1–18.
[133]
K. Ryan, ‘Introduction’, in Shakespeare: The Last Plays, vol. Longman Critical Readers, Longman, 1999, pp. 4–12.
[134]
C. M. Kay, ‘An Overview of Critical Approaches to the Romances’, in Shakespeare’s Romances Reconsidered, Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1978.
[135]
L. Strachey, ‘Shakespeare’s Final Period’, in Books and Characters: French and English, London: Chatto and Windus, 1922.
[136]
W. Raleigh, ‘The Last Phase’, in Shakespeare, vol. English men of letters, London: Macmillan, 1907.
[137]
S. J. Greenblatt, ‘Martial Law in the Land of Cockaigne’, in Shakespearean Negotiations: The Circulation of Social Energy in Renaissance England, Oxford: Clarendon, 1988, pp. 129–163.
[138]
N. Wood, ‘Political Criticism at the Crossroads: The Utopian Historicism’, in The Tempest, vol. Theory in practice series, Buckingham: Open University Press, 1995, pp. 29–66.
[139]
P. Brown, ‘This Thing of Darkness I Acknowledge Mine’, in Political Shakespeare: Essays in Cultural Materialism, 2nd Edition., Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1994, pp. 48–71.
[140]
K. Ryan, ‘Introduction’, in Shakespeare: The Last Plays, vol. Longman Critical Readers, Longman, 1999, pp. 1–21.
[141]
K. Ryan, ‘"What Cares These Roarers for the Name of King?”: Language and Utopia in The Tempest’, in Shakespeare: The Last Plays, vol. Longman Critical Readers, Longman, 1999, pp. 245–278 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=1710649
[142]
T. Hawkes, ‘Playhouse-Workhouse’, in That Shakespearian Rag: Essays on a Critical Process, London: Methuen, 1986, pp. 1–26.
[143]
J. Gillies, ‘Extract’, in Shakespeare and the Geography of Difference, vol. Cambridge studies in Renaissance literature and culture, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994, pp. 140–155.
[144]
S. Greenblatt, ‘Learning to Curse: Aspects of Linguistic Colonialism in the Sixteenth Century’, in Learning to Curse: Essays in Early Modern Culture, New York: Routledge, 1990, pp. 22–51.
[145]
S. Greenblatt, ‘Learning to Curse: Aspects of Linguistic Colonialism in the Sixteenth Century’, in Learning to Curse: Essays in Early Modern Culture, New York: Routledge, 1990, pp. 22–51 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=1020235
[146]
S. Clark, ‘The Tempest, or The Enchanted Island’, in Shakespeare Made Fit: Restoration Adaptations of Shakespeare, London: Everyman, 1997, pp. 79–185.
[147]
M. Dobson, ‘“Remember/First to Possess his Books”: The Appropriation of The Tempest 1700-1800’, in Shakespeare Survey 43, S. Wells, Ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991, pp. 99–108 [Online]. Available: http://universitypublishingonline.org/ref/id/shakespeare/CBO9781139053204A012
[148]
K. E. Maus, ‘“Arcadia Host: Politics and Revision in the Restoration” Tempest’, Renaissance Drama, vol. 13, pp. 189–209, 1982 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/43264634
[149]
M. H. Wikander, ‘“The Duke my Father’s Wrack”: The Innocence of the Restoration Tempest’, in Shakespeare Survey 43, S. Wells, Ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991, pp. 91–98 [Online]. Available: http://universitypublishingonline.org/ref/id/shakespeare/CBO9781139053204A011
[150]
C. DiPietro, ‘Seeing Places: The Tempest and the Baroque Spectacle of the Restoration Theatre’, Shakespeare, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 168–186, 2013, doi: 10.1080/17450918.2013.784849.
[151]
A. Nicholl, ‘Three Adaptations’, in Shakespeare Survey 13, A. Nicoll, Ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1960, pp. 137–145.
[152]
R. Browning, ‘Caliban Upon Setebos | Poetry Foundation’. [Online]. Available: https://web.archive.org/web/20170407155817/https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems-and-poets/poems/detail/43748
[153]
S. Plath, ‘Full Fathom Five’, in The Colossus, London: Faber, 1967, pp. 46–47.
[154]
S. Plath, Ariel. London: Faber, 1965.
[155]
S. Plath, ‘Ariel | Poetry Foundation’. [Online]. Available: https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems-and-poets/poems/detail/49001
[156]
S. Plath, ‘Full Fathom Five | Digital-Shakespeare’. [Online]. Available: http://digital-shakespeare.angelfire.com/fullfathomplath.html
[157]
T. Hughes, ‘Setebos’, in Birthday Letters, London: Faber, 1998.
[158]
T. Hughes, ‘Night-Ride on Ariel’, in Birthday Letters, London: Faber, 1998.
[159]
T. Hughes, ‘Freedom of Speech’, in Birthday Letters, London: Faber, 1998.
[160]
T. Hughes, ‘Setebos | Immrama’, 1998. [Online]. Available: http://immrama.blogspot.co.uk/2004/12/setebos-ted-hughes.html
[161]
D. Shaw, ‘Extract’, in The Dialectical Temper: The Rhetorical Art of Robert Browning, Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1968, pp. 193–203.
[162]
R. Sawyer, ‘The Shakespeareanization of Robert Browning’, in Shakespeare and Appropriation, vol. Accents on Shakespeare, Routledge, 1999, pp. 142–159.
[163]
C. Desmet, ‘The Shakespeareanization of Robert Browning’, in Shakespeare and Appropriation, London: Routledge, 1999, pp. 142–159 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=169306
[164]
E. W. Slinn, ‘Extract’, in Browning and the Fictions of Identity, London: Macmillan, 1982, pp. 84–90.
[165]
E. Wagner, Ariel’s Gift: Ted Hughes, Sylvia Plath and the Story of Birthday Letters. New York: Norton, 2001.
[166]
J. Rose, The Haunting of Sylvia Plath. London: Virago, 1991.
[167]
J. Malcolm, Silent Woman: Sylvia Plath and Ted Hughes. Papermac, 1995.
[168]
A. Kirsch, ‘Introduction and Commentary’, in The Sea and the Mirror: A Commentary on Shakespeare’s the Tempest, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2003, pp. xi–xliii.
[169]
W. H. Auden, ‘Balaam and his Ass: On the Literary Use of the Master-Servant Relationship’, in The Dyer’s Hand: And Other Essays, London: Faber, 1963, pp. 107–145.
[170]
W. H. Auden, ‘Balaam and The Ass: On the Literary Use of the Master-Servant Relationship’, Encounter, no. July, pp. 35–53, 1954 [Online]. Available: http://www.unz.org/Pub/Encounter-1954jul-00035
[171]
S. Smith, ‘Extract’, in W. H. Auden, vol. Rereading literature, Oxford: Blackwell, 1985, pp. 153–160.
[172]
J. Fuller, ‘Extract’, in A Reader’s Guide to W. H. Auden, London: Thames & Hudson Ltd, 1970, pp. 157–165.
[173]
H. Greenberg, ‘Extract’, in Quest for the Necessary: W. H. Auden and the Dilemma of Divided Consciousness, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1968, pp. 122–141.
[174]
F. P. W. McDowell, ‘The Sea and the Mirror’, in Auden: A Collection of Critical Essays, vol. Twentieth century views, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1964.
[175]
W. Shakespeare, D. Jarman, and H. Williams, ‘The Tempest’. Second Sight, 1979.
[176]
P. Greenaway and W. Shakespeare, ‘Prospero’s Books’. Atlantic Film, [Stockholm], 2010.
[177]
J. Buchanan, ‘Historically Juxtaposed Beans (II): The Tempest on Film’, in Shakespeare on Film, vol. Inside film, Harlow: Longman, 2005, pp. 150–183.
[178]
J. Buchanan, ‘The Tempest on Film’, in Shakespeare on Film, Harlow, England: Pearson Longman, 2005 [Online]. Available: http://ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.myilibrary.com?id=177112
[179]
J. C. Bulman, ‘Drowning the Book: Prospero’s Books and the Textual Shakespeare’, in Shakespeare, Theory, and Performance, London: Routledge, 1996, pp. 189–212 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=179529
[180]
J. C. Bulman, ‘Drowning the Book: Prospero’s Books and the Textual Shakespeare’, in Shakespeare, Theory and Performance, London: Routledge, 1996, pp. 189–212.
[181]
R. Shaughnessy, ‘A Post-National European Cinema: A Consideration of Derek Jarman’s The Tempest and Edward II’, in Shakespeare on Film, vol. New Casebooks, Macmillan, 1998, pp. 145–155.
[182]
L. E. Boose, ‘Shakespeare in the Age of Post-Mechanical Reproduction: Sexual and Electronic Magic in Prospero’s Books’, in Shakespeare, The Movie: Popularizing the Plays on Film, TV and Video, Hoboken: Taylor and Francis, 1997, pp. 172–189 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=240528
[183]
L. E. Boose, ‘Shakespeare in the Age of Post-Mechanical Reproduction: Sexual and Electronic Magic in Prospero’s Books’, in Shakespeare, the Movie: Popularizing the Plays on Film, TV and Video, London: Routledge, 1997, pp. 172–189.
[184]
P. Greenaway, Prospero’s Books: A Film of Shakespeare’s the Tempest. London: Chatto & Windus, 1991.
[185]
W. Shakespeare and J. Taymor, ‘The Tempest | Box of Broadcasts’. 2010 [Online]. Available: https://learningonscreen.ac.uk/ondemand/index.php/prog/05A9694D?bcast=123986425
[186]
D. Cartmell, ‘Shakespeare, Film and Race: Screening Othello and The Tempest’, in Interpreting Shakespeare on Screen, New York: St. Martin’s Press, 2000, pp. 67–93 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/reader.action?docID=6234544&ppg=78
[187]
C. Sibley-Esposito, ‘Becoming-Ariel: Viewing Julie Taymor’s The Tempest through an Ecocritical Lens’, Babel, no. 24, pp. 121–134, 2011, doi: 10.4000/babel.156.
[188]
G. Holderness, ‘Radical Potentiality and Institutional Closure: Shakespeare in Film and Television’, in Political Shakespeare: Essays in Cultural Materialism, Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1994, pp. 206–225.
[189]
L. Hopkins, Shakespeare’s the Tempest: The Relationship Between Text and Film, vol. Screen adaptations. London: Methuen Drama, 2008.
[190]
J. Taymor and W. Shakespeare, The Tempest. New York: Abrams, 2010.