[1]
Ahmed, S. 2000. Recognising Strangers. Strange Encounters: Embodied Others in Post-Coloniality. Routledge.
[2]
Ahmed, S. 2000. Recognising Strangers. Strange Encounters: Embodied Others in Post-Coloniality. Routledge.
[3]
Always Choose the Worst Option - Artistic Resistance and the Strategy of Over-Identification: 2007. http://www.bavo.biz/texts/view/45.
[4]
Always Choose the Worst Option - Artistic Resistance and the Strategy of Over-Identification: 2007. http://www.bavo.biz/texts/view/45.
[5]
Andron, S. 2017. Interviewing Walls: Towards a Method of Reading Hybrid Surface Inscriptions. Graffiti and Street Art: Reading, Writing and Representing the City. K. Avramidis and M. Tsilimpounidi, eds. Routledge.
[6]
Andron, S. 2016. Interviewing Walls: Towards a Method of Reading Hybrid Surface Inscriptions. Graffiti and Street Art: Reading, Writing and Representing the City. Taylor and Francis.
[7]
Avgikos, J. 1995. Group Material Timeline: Activism as a Work of Art. But Is It Art?: The Spirit of Art as Activism. Bay Press.
[8]
Barns, S. 2014. Sounds Different: Listening to the Proliferating Spaces of Technological Modernity in the City. Space and Culture. 17, 1 (2014), 4–15. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331213494733.
[9]
Bellinck, T. 2010. We Were Dying and Then We Got a Prize. Art and Activism in the Age of Globalization. NAi.
[10]
Beyes, T. 2015. Summoning Art to Save the City: A Note. Ephemera. Theory and Politics in Organization. 15, 1 (2015).
[11]
Beyes, T. 2015. Summoning Art to Save the City: A Note. Ephemera. Theory and Politics in Organization. 15, 1 (2015).
[12]
Beyes, T. 2010. Uncontained: The Art and Politics of Reconfiguring Urban Space. Culture and Organization. 16, 3 (2010), 229–246. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14759551.2010.503499.
[13]
Birch, A. and Tompkins, J. 2012. Performing Site-Specific Theatre: Politics, Place, Practice. Palgrave Macmillan.
[14]
Birch, A. and Tompkins, J. 2012. Performing Site-Specific Theatre: Politics, Place, Practice. Palgrave Macmillan.
[15]
Bishop, C. 2012. The Social Turn: Collaboration and Its Discontents. Artificial Hells: Participatory Art and the Politics of Spectatorship. Verso.
[16]
Bishop, C. 2012. The Social Turn: Collaboration and Its Discontents. Artificial Hells: Participatory Art and the Politics of Spectatorship. Verso.
[17]
Bishop, C. 2006. The Social Turn: Collaborations and Its Discontents. Artforum International. 44, 6 (Feb) (2006), 178–183.
[18]
Bo, Z. 2012. From Gongren to Gongmin: A Comparative Analysis of Ai Weiwei’s Sunflower Seeds and Nian. Journal of Visual Art Practice. 11, 2 (2012), 117–133. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1386/jvap.11.2-3.117_1.
[19]
Bodies in Alliance and the Politics of the Street: 2011. http://www.eipcp.net/transversal/1011/butler/en.
[20]
Bonnett, A. 1992. Art, Ideology, and Everyday Space: Subversive Tendencies From Dada to Postmodernism. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space. 10, 1 (1992), 69–86. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1068/d100069.
[21]
Borden, I. 2002. The Unknown City: Contesting Architecture and Social Space. MIT.
[22]
Boyd, D. 2011. Social Network Sites as Networked Publics: Affordances, Dynamics, and Implications. A Networked Self: Identity, Community and Culture on Social Network Sites. Routledge.
[23]
Brejzek, T. 2010. From Social Network to Urban Intervention: On the Scenographies of Flash Mobs and Urban Swarms. International Journal of Performance Arts & Digital Media. 6, 1 (2010), 109–122. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1386/padm.6.1.109_1.
[24]
Bull, M. and Back, L. 2016. The Auditory Culture Reader. Bloomsbury Academic, an imprint of Bloomsbury Publishing, Plc.
[25]
Butler, T. 2006. A Walk of Art: The Potential of the Sound Walk as Practice in Cultural Geography. Social & Cultural Geography. 7, 6 (2006), 889–908. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14649360601055821.
[26]
Butler, T. and Miller, G. 2005. Linked: A Landmark in Sound, a Public Walk of Art. Cultural Geographies. 12, 1 (2005).
[27]
Careri, F. 2017. Walkscapes: Walking as an Aesthetic Practice. Culicidae Architectural Press.
[28]
Carmona, M. 2015. Re-Theorising Contemporary Public Space: A New Narrative and a New Normative. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability. 8, 4 (2015), 373–405. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/17549175.2014.909518.
[29]
Chilton, T. 2002. Adventure Playgrounds in the Twenty-First Century. Playwork: Theory and Practice. Open University Press.
[30]
Cohen, P. 2013. On the Wrong Side of the Track?: East London and the Post-Olympics. Lawrence and Wishart.
[31]
Cornish, M. 2015. Performing the Archive: History and Memory in Recent German Theatre. Theatre Journal. 67, 1 (2015), 63–82. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1353/tj.2015.0032.
[32]
Dawkins, A. and Loftus, A. 2013. The Senses as Direct Theoreticians in Practice. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. 38, 4 (2013), 665–677. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2012.00551.x.
[33]
De Cautier, L. 2010. Notes on Subversion/Theses on Activism. Art and Activism in the Age of Globalization. NAi.
[34]
De Certeau, M. 1988. Walking the City. The Practice of Everyday Life. University of California Press.
[35]
Deutsche, R. 1992. Art and Public Space: Questions of Democracy. Thresholds. 2 (1992).
[36]
Deutsche, R. 1988. Uneven Development: Public Art in New York City. October. 47, (1988). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/778979.
[37]
Dias, M.P. 2012. A Machine to See With (And Reflect Upon). Liminalities. 8, 1 (2012).
[38]
Digital Performance in Networked Public Spaces: Situating the Posthuman Subject | ISEA2011 Istanbul: 2011. https://isea2011.sabanciuniv.edu/paper/digital-performance-networked-public-spaces-situating-posthuman-subject.
[39]
Dixon, S. 2007. Digital Performance: A History of New Media in Theater, Dance, Performance Art, and Installation. MIT Press.
[40]
Dolan, J. 2001. Performance, Utopia, and the ‘Utopian Performative’. Theatre Journal. 53, 3 (2001).
[41]
Dreysse, M. and Malzacher, F. 2008. Experts of the Everyday: The Theatre of Rimini Protokoll. Alexander Verlag.
[42]
Edelman, M. 1995. From Art to Politics: How Artistic Creations Shape Political Conceptions. University of Chicago Press.
[43]
Edensor, T. 2005. The Ghosts of Industrial Ruins: Ordering and Disordering Memory in Excessive Space. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space. 23, 6 (2005), 829–849. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1068/d58j.
[44]
Eileraas, K. 2014. Sex(t)ing Revolution, Femen-izing the Public Square: Aliaa Magda Elmahdy, Nude Protest, and Transnational Feminist Body Politics. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society. 40, 1 (2014), 40–52. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1086/677073.
[45]
Fenton, J. 2005. Space, Chance, Time: Walking Backwards Through the Hours on the Left and Right Banks of Paris. Cultural Geographies. 12, 4 (2005).
[46]
Foster, S.L. 2003. Choreographies of Protest. Theatre Journal. 55, 3 (2003).
[47]
Fraser, N. 2010. Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy. The Idea of the Public Sphere: A Reader. Lexington Books.
[48]
Games Monitor | Debunking Olympics Myths: http://www.gamesmonitor.org.uk/.
[49]
Gold, J.R. and Gold, M.M. 2007. Olympic Cities: City Agendas, Planning, and the World’s Games, 1896-2012. Routledge.
[50]
Gold, J.R. and Gold, M.M. 2008. Olympic Cities: Regeneration, City Rebranding and Changing Urban Agendas. Geography Compass. 2, 1 (2008), 300–318. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8198.2007.00080.x.
[51]
Graham, S. and Marvin, S. 2001. Splintering Urbanism: Networked Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities and the Urban Condition. Routledge.
[52]
Graham, S. and Marvin, S. 2001. Splintering Urbanism: Networked Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities and the Urban Condition. Routledge.
[53]
Hahn, D. 2014. Performing Public Spaces, Staging Collective Memory: 50 Kilometres of Files by Rimini Protokoll. TDR/The Drama Review. 58, 3 (2014), 27–38. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1162/DRAM_a_00371.
[54]
Hall, T. 2003. Art and Urban Change: Public Art in Urban Regeneration. Cultural Geography in Practice. Arnold.
[55]
Hannah, D. 2011. Constructing Barricades: Politics of the Event and ‘Weak Architecture’. Architecture and the Political Fourth International Symposium on Architectural Theory.
[56]
Harvie, J. 2005. Being Her: Presence, Absence, and Performance in the Art of Janet Cardiff and Tracey Emin. Auto/biography and Identity: Women, Theatre and Performance. Manchester University Press.
[57]
Harvie, J. 2009. City and Performativity: Performing in the City. Theatre & the City. Palgrave Macmillan.
[58]
Harvie, J. 2009. City and Performativity: Performing in the City. Theatre & the City. Palgrave Macmillan.
[59]
Harvie, J. 2006. City and Performativity: Performing the City. Theatre and the City. Palgrave Macmillan.
[60]
Harvie, J. 2006. City and Performativity: Performing the City. Theatre and the City. Palgrave Macmillan.
[61]
Harvie, J. 2011. Democracy and Neoliberalism in Art’s Social Turn and Roger Hiorns’s Seizure. Performance Research. 16, 2 (2011), 113–123. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13528165.2011.578842.
[62]
Harvie, J. 2013. Space: Exclusion and Engagement. Fair Play: Art, Performance and Neoliberalism. Palgrave Macmillan.
[63]
Harvie, J. 2013. Space, Exclusion and Engagement. Fair Play: Art, Performance and Neoliberalism.
[64]
Harvie, J. 2013. Space: Exclusion and Engagement. Fair Play: Art, Performance and Neoliberalism. Palgrave Macmillan.
[65]
Harvie, J. 2013. Space, Exclusion and Engagement. Fair Play: Art, Performance and Neoliberalism.
[66]
Harvie, J. 2009. Theatre & the City. Palgrave Macmillan.
[67]
Harvie, J. and Etchells, T. 2006. Theatre and the City. Palgrave Macmillan.
[68]
Harvie, J. and Zaiontz, K. 2013. Contemporary Theatre Review: Vol 23, No 4: The Cultural Politics of London 2012. (2013).
[69]
Hawkins, H. 2013. Geography and Art. An Expanding Field. Progress in Human Geography. 37, 1 (2013), 52–71. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132512442865.
[70]
Hawkins, H. 2010. Turn Your Trash Into… Rubbish, Art and Politics. Richard Wentworth’s Geographical Imagination. Social & Cultural Geography. 11, 8 (2010), 805–827. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2010.522719.
[71]
Heddon, D. 2010. The Horizon of Sound Soliciting the Earwitness. Performance Research. 15, 3 (2010), 36–42. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13528165.2010.527200.
[72]
Heddon, D. et al. 2009. Walking, Writing and Performance: Autobiographical Texts. Intellect.
[73]
Heddon, D. et al. 2009. Walking, Writing and Performance: Autobiographical Texts. Intellect.
[74]
Holub, B. 2017. Why Is Taking Action Beautiful? Explorations for Actionology. New Stakeholders of Urban Change: A Question of Culture and Attitude?. H.M. Berger and G. Ziemer, eds. Jovis.
[75]
Hopkins, D.J. et al. 2011. Introduction: City/Text/Performance. Performance and the City. Palgrave Macmillan.
[76]
Hopkins, D.J. et al. 2011. Performance and the City. Palgrave Macmillan.
[77]
Hopkins, D.J. et al. 2013. Performance and the Global City. Palgrave Macmillan.
[78]
Hopkins, D.J. and Solga, K. 2013. Introduction: City/Text/Performance. Performance and the Global City. D.J. Hopkins and K. Solga, eds. Palgrave Macmillan.
[79]
Imrie, R. et al. 2009. Regenerating London: Governance, Sustainability and Community in a Global City. Routledge.
[80]
Imrie, R. et al. 2009. Regenerating London: Governance, Sustainability and Community in a Global City. Routledge.
[81]
Jackson, S. 2011. Quality Time: Social Practice Debates in Contemporary Art. Social Works: Performing Art, Supporting Publics. Routledge.
[82]
Jackson, S. 2011. Quality Time: Social Practice Debates in Contemporary Art. Social Works: Performing Art, Supporting Publics. Routledge.
[83]
Jackson, S. 2011. Social Works: Performing Art, Supporting Publics. Routledge.
[84]
Jackson, S. 2011. Social Works: Performing Art, Supporting Publics. Routledge.
[85]
Jenks, C. 1995. Watching Your Step: The History and Practice of the Flâneur. Visual Culture. Routledge.
[86]
Kelly, P. 2005. What Have You Done Today Mervyn Day?
[87]
Kester, G. 2006. Response to Claire Bishop’s ‘Another Turn’. Artforum International. 44, 9 (May) (2006).
[88]
Kester, G.H. 2004. Conversation Pieces: Community and Communication in Modern Art. University of California Press.
[89]
Kester, G.H. 2011. Eminent Domain: Art and Urban Space. The One and the Many: Contemporary Collaborative Art in a Global Context. Duke University Press.
[90]
Kester, G.H. 2011. Eminent Domain: Art and Urban Space. The One and the Many: Contemporary Collaborative Art in a Global Context. Duke University Press.
[91]
Kuppers, P. 1999. Moving in the Cityscape: Performance and the Embodied Experience of the Flâneur. New Theatre Quarterly. 15, 04 (1999). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266464X00013245.
[92]
Kwon, M. 2004. One Place After Another: Site-Specific Art and Locational Identity. MIT Press.
[93]
Kwon, M. 2004. One Place After Another: Site-Specific Art and Locational Identity. MIT Press.
[94]
LaBelle, B. 2006. Background Noise: Perspectives on Sound Art. Continuum.
[95]
Lavery, C. 2005. The Pepys of London E11: Graeme Miller and the Politics of Linked. New Theatre Quarterly. 21, 2 (2005), 148–160. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266464X05000059.
[96]
Lavrinec, J. 2011. From a ‘Blind Walker’ to an ‘Urban Curator’: Initiating ‘Emotionally Moving Situations’ in Public Spaces. Creativity Studies. 4, 1 (2011), 54–63. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3846/20290187.2011.577176.
[97]
Lavrinec, J. 2011. Revitalization of Public Space: From "Non-Places” to Creative Playgrounds. Santalka: filosofija, komunikacija. 19, 2 (2011), 70–75. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3846/coactivity.2011.16.
[98]
Leeson, L. 2005. Art for Change: Loraine Leeson : Works From 1975-2005. Neue Gesellschaft f�r Bildende Kunst.
[99]
Lefebvre, H. 2004. Seen From the Window. Rhythmanalysis: Space, Time, and Everyday Life. Continuum.
[100]
Lefebvre, H. 2004. Seen From the Window. Rhythmanalysis: Space, Time, and Everyday Life. Continuum.
[101]
Lefebvre, H. 2004. The Rythmanalyst: A Previsionary Portrait. Rhythmanalysis: Space, Time, and Everyday Life. Continuum.
[102]
Lefebvre, H. 2004. The Rythmanalyst: A Previsionary Portrait. Rhythmanalysis: Space, Time, and Everyday Life. Continuum.
[103]
Lester, S. 2014. Play as Protest: Clandestine Moments of Disturbance and Hope. Education, Childhood and Anarchism. Routledge; 1 edition.
[104]
Lester, S. 2014. Play as Protest: Clandestine Moments of Disturbance and Hope. Education, Childhood and Anarchism. Routledge; 1 edition.
[105]
London 2012 Olympics | Citizens UK: https://web.archive.org/web/20130812091807/http://www.citizensuk.org/campaigns/london-2012-olympics/.
[106]
Malzacher, F. 2014. Putting the Urinal Back in the Restroom. Truth Is Concrete: A Handbook for Artistic Strategies in Real Politics. F. Malzacher and A. Faucheret, eds. Sternberg Press.
[107]
Malzacher, F. 2014. Putting the Urinal Back in the Restroom. Truth Is Concrete: A Handbook for Artistic Strategies in Real Politics. F. Malzacher and A. Faucheret, eds. Sternberg Press.
[108]
McCreery, S. 2001. The Claremont Road Situation. The Unknown City: Contesting Architecture and Social Space. MIT.
[109]
McDonough, T. 2009. The Situationists and the City. Verso.
[110]
McKeon, O. 2014. Solidarity Means Attack: Choreographic Analysis and the West Coast Port Blockade. Activate. 3, 1 (2014).
[111]
Melville, S. 1999. Creating Spaces for Adventure. Built Environment. 25, 1 (1999).
[112]
Merx, S. 2011. Public Pie Performing Public Space. Performance Research. 16, 2 (2011), 132–137. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13528165.2011.578844.
[113]
Merx, S. 2013. The Politics of Scenography: Disrupting the Stage. Performance Research. 18, 3 (2013), 54–58. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13528165.2013.818314.
[114]
Miller, G. 2003. Linked: A Landmark in Sound, an Invisible Artwork, a Walk. Arts Admin.
[115]
Miller, G. 2005. Walking the Walk, Talking the Talk: Re-imagining the Urban Landscape. New Theatre Quarterly. 21, 2 (2005), 161–165. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266464X05000060.
[116]
Mouffe, C. 2007. Artistic Activism and Antagonistic Spaces. Art and Research: A Journal of Ideas, Contexts and Methods. 1, 2 (2007).
[117]
Mouffe, C. 2007. Artistic Activism and Antagonistic Spaces. Art and Research: A Journal of Ideas, Contexts and Methods. 1, 2 (2007).
[118]
Neal, Z.P. 2010. Introduction: Public Space as Art, Theatre and Performance. Common Ground?: Readings and Reflections on Public Space.
[119]
Neal, Z.P. 2010. Introduction: Public Space as Art, Theatre and Performance. Common Ground?: Readings and Reflections on Public Space. Routledge.
[120]
Neal, Z.P. 2010. Locating Public Space. Common Ground?: Readings and Reflections on Public Space.
[121]
Neal, Z.P. 2010. Locating Public Space. Common Ground?: Readings and Reflections on Public Space. Routledge.
[122]
Nibbelink, L.G. 2015. The Mirror of Public Space – Interview With Dries Verhoven. Intermedial performance and politics in the public sphere. K. Arfara et al., eds. Palgrave Macmillan.
[123]
Olsen, C.S. 2019. Socially Engaged Art and the Neoliberal City. Routledge.
[124]
Orum, A.M. and Neal, Z.P. 2010. Common Ground?: Readings and Reflections on Public Space.
[125]
Orum, A.M. and Neal, Z.P. 2010. Common Ground?: Readings and Reflections on Public Space. Routledge.
[126]
Parry, B. et al. 2011. Cultural Hijack: Rethinking Intervention. Liverpool University Press.
[127]
Parry, B. 2011. Rethinking Intervention. Cultural Hijack: Rethinking Intervention. Liverpool University Press.
[128]
Pearson, M. 2010. Materiality. Site-Specific Performance. Palgrave Macmillan.
[129]
Pinder, D. 2005. Arts of Urban Exploration. Cultural Geographies. 12, 4 (2005).
[130]
Pinder, D. 2005. Arts of Urban Exploration. Cultural Geographies. 12, 4 (2005).
[131]
Pinder, D. 2001. Ghostly Footsteps: Voices, Memories and Walks in the City. Ecumene. 8, 1 (2001), 1–19. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/096746080100800101.
[132]
Pinder, D. 2009. Situationism/Situationist Geographies. International Encyclopedia of Human Geography. 144–150.
[133]
Pinder, D. 2016. Sound, Memory and Interruption: Ghosts of London’s M11 Link Road. Cities Interrupted: Visual Culture and Urban Space. Bloomsbury Academic; 01 edition.
[134]
Pinder, D. 2009. Surrealism/Surrealist Geographies. International Encyclopedia of Human Geography. 87–94.
[135]
Pinder, D. 2005. Visions of the City: Utopianism, Power, and Politics in Twentieth-Century Urbanism. Routledge.
[136]
Pinder, D. 2005. Visions of the City: Utopianism, Power, and Politics in Twentieth-Century Urbanism. Routledge.
[137]
Pitsikali, A. 2015. Examining the Playground as a Civic Space through the Lens of Play. Journal of Playwork Practice. 2, 1 (2015), 45–59.
[138]
Powell, H. and Marrero-Guillamn̤, I. 2012. The Art of Dissent: Adventures in London’s Olympic State. Marshgate.
[139]
Poynter, G. 2016. Olympic Cities: 2012 and the Remaking of London. Routledge.
[140]
Rancière, J. 2015. The Politics of Aesthetics: The Distribution of the Sensible. Bloomsbury Academic.
[141]
Rancière, J. 2015. The Politics of Aesthetics: The Distribution of the Sensible. Bloomsbury Academic.
[142]
Rendell, J. 2006. Art and Architecture: A Place Between. I. B. Tauris.
[143]
Rendell, J. 2009. Critical Spatial Practice.
[144]
Rodgers, S. et al. 2014. Media Practices and Urban Politics: Conceptualizing the Powers of the Media-Urban Nexus. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space. 32, 6 (2014), 1054–1070. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1068/d13157p.
[145]
Rosler, M. 2010. Culture Class: Art, Creativity, Urbanism, Part I. e-flux. 21, (2010).
[146]
Rosler, M. 2010. Culture Class: Art, Creativity, Urbanism, Part I. e-flux. 21, (2010).
[147]
Rosler, M. 2011. Culture Class: Art, Creativity, Urbanism, Part II. e-flux. 23, (2011).
[148]
Rosler, M. 2011. Culture Class: Art, Creativity, Urbanism, Part II. e-flux. 23, (2011).
[149]
Rosler, M. 2011. Culture Class: Art, Creativity, Urbanism, Part III. e-flux. 25, (2011).
[150]
Rosler, M. 2011. Culture Class: Art, Creativity, Urbanism, Part III. e-flux. 25, (2011).
[151]
Rosler, M. and Wallis, B. 1999. If You Lived Here: The City in Art, Theory and Social Activism. Bay Press, U. S.
[152]
Rossiter, B. and Gibson, K. 2003. Walking and Performing ‘The City’: A Melbourne Chronicle. A Companion to the City. Blackwell.
[153]
R-Urban London: R-Urban: https://r-urban-wick.net/.
[154]
Sachs Olsen, C. 2018. Collaborative Challenges: Negotiating the Complicities of Socially Engaged Art Within an Era of Neoliberal Urbanism. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space. 36, 2 (2018), 273–293. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775817744782.
[155]
Sachs Olsen, C. 2016. Materiality as Performance. Performance Research. 21, 3 (2016), 37–46. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13528165.2016.1176736.
[156]
Sachs Olsen, C. 2018. Performance and Urban Space: An Ambivalent Affair. Geography Compass. (2018). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12408.
[157]
Schaub, M. 2005. Janet Cardiff: The Walk Book. Thyssen-Bornemisza Art Contemporary.
[158]
Schipper, I. 2014. City as Performance. TDR/The Drama Review. 58, 3 (2014), 18–26. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1162/DRAM_a_00370.
[159]
Schneider, R. 2011. Performing Remains: Art and War in Times of Theatrical Reenactment. Routledge.
[160]
Schneider, R. 2011. Performing Remains: Art and War in Times of Theatrical Reenactment. Routledge.
[161]
Shaw, I.G.R. and Warf, B. 2009. Worlds of Affect: Virtual Geographies of Video Games. Environment and Planning A. 41, 6 (2009), 1332–1343. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1068/a41284.
[162]
Situationist International Online: https://www.cddc.vt.edu/sionline/.
[163]
Slater, J.B. and Iles, A. 2010. No Room to Move: Radical Art and the Regenerate City. Mute.
[164]
Solnit, R. 2001. Wanderlust: A History of Walking. Penguin.
[165]
de Souza de Silva, A. and Frith, J. 2012. Location-Aware Technologies: Control and Privacy in Hybrid Spaces. Communication Matters: Materialist Approaches to Media, Mobility and Networks. Routledge.
[166]
de Souza e Silva, A. 2013. Location-Aware Mobile Technologies: Historical, Social and Spatial Approaches. Mobile Media & Communication. 1, 1 (2013), 116–121. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157912459492.
[167]
de Souza e Silva, A. and Hjorth, L. 2009. Playful Urban Spaces: A Historical Approach to Mobile Games. Simulation & Gaming. 40, 5 (2009), 602–625. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878109333723.
[168]
Taylor, D. 2003. The Archive and the Repertoire: Performing Cultural Memory in the Americas. Duke University Press.
[169]
Thompson, J. 2009. Performance Affects: Applied Theatre and the End of Effect. Palgrave Macmillan.
[170]
Thompson, J. 2009. Performance Affects: Applied Theatre and the End of Effect. Palgrave Macmillan.
[171]
Thompson, N. 2017. Living as Form. Living as Form: Socially Engaged Art from 1991-2011. MIT Press; Reprint edition.
[172]
Thompson, N. et al. 2004. The Interventionists: Users’ Manual for the Creative Disruption of Everyday Life. MASS MoCA.
[173]
Turner, C. 2010. Mis-Guidance and Spatial Planning: Dramaturgies of Public Space. Contemporary Theatre Review. 20, 2 (2010), 149–161. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/10486801003682351.
[174]
Vickery, J. 2012. Beyond the Creative City – Cultural Policy in an Age of Scarcity.
[175]
Whybrow, N. 2011. Art and the City. I.B. Tauris.
[176]
Whybrow, N. 2011. Art and the City. I.B. Tauris.
[177]
Whybrow, N. 2011. Art and the City. I.B. Tauris.
[178]
Whybrow, N. 2011. Art and the City. I.B. Tauris.
[179]
Whybrow, N. 2010. Performance and the Contemporary City: An Interdisciplinary Reader. Palgrave Macmillan.
[180]
Whybrow, N. 2010. Performance and the Contemporary City: An Interdisciplinary Reader. Palgrave Macmillan.
[181]
Wilson, E. 1992. The Invisible Flâneur. New Left Review. 191, (1992).
[182]
Wilson, H.F. 2017. On Geography and Encounter: Bodies, Borders, and Difference. Progress in Human Geography. 41, 4 (2017), 451–471. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132516645958.
[183]
City: Vol 16, No 4.