1.
Brysbaert M, Rastle K. Historical and Conceptual Issues in Psychology. 2nd ed. Harlow: Pearson; 2013.
2.
Brysbaert M, Rastle K. Historical and Conceptual Issues in Psychology [Internet]. Harlow: Pearson Education; 2009. Available from: http://ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781405874489
3.
Chalmers AF. What Is This Thing Called Science? 3rd ed. Maidenhead: Open University Press; 1999.
4.
Hedges LV. How Hard Is Hard Science, How Soft Is Soft Science? the Empirical Cumulativeness of Research. American Psychologist [Internet]. 1987;42(5):443–55. Available from: http://web.a.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail/detail?vid=1&sid=62de742c-ee68-43c4-8cab-4ceb62d395f3%40sessionmgr4010&hid=4109&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=1987-26934-001&db=pdh
5.
Lilienfeld SO. Public Skepticism of Psychology: Why Many People Perceive the Study of Human Behavior as Unscientific. American Psychologist [Internet]. 2012;67(2). Available from: http://web.a.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail/detail?vid=1&sid=6d759316-824d-4168-a238-5faa05c315a0%40sessionmgr4010&hid=4109&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=2011-12007-001&db=pdh
6.
Kumar N. Karl Popper, Psychology and Philosophy. Psychological Studies. 2010;55(3):270–4.
7.
Rowbottom DP. Kuhn vs. Popper on criticism and dogmatism in science: a resolution at the group level. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. 2011 Mar;42(1):117–24.
8.
Fuller S. Kuhn vs. Popper: The Struggle for the Soul of Science [Internet]. 2003. Available from: http://www.collier.sts.vt.edu/5306/kuhnpopper.pdf
9.
Brysbaert M, Rastle K. Historical and Conceptual Issues in Psychology. 2nd ed. Harlow: Pearson; 2013.
10.
Brysbaert M, Rastle K. Historical and Conceptual Issues in Psychology [Internet]. Harlow: Pearson Education; 2009. Available from: http://ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781405874489
11.
Carpenter S. Some Neglected Contributions of Wilhelm Wundt to the Psychology of Memory [Internet]. 2005. Available from: http://public.psych.iastate.edu/shacarp/carpenter_2005.pdf
12.
Tolman EC. Cognitive Maps in Rats and Men. Psychological Review. 1948;55(4):189–208.
13.
Danziger K. The History of Introspection Reconsidered [open access]. Journal of the History of Behaviour Sciences [Internet]. 1980;16(3). Available from: http://www.kurtdanziger.com/hist%20introsp.pdf
14.
Dutton DG, Aron AP. Some Evidence for Heightened Sexual Attraction Under Conditions of High Anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology [Internet]. 1974;30(4):510–7. Available from: http://web.a.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail/detail?sid=2fa2ff6e-e843-4b21-afa9-b96a764a6a98%40sessionmgr4009&vid=0&hid=4109&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=1975-03016-001&db=pdh
15.
Fridlund AJ. Little Albert: A Neurologically Impaired Child. History of Psychology [Internet]. 2012;15(4):302–27. Available from: http://web.b.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail/detail?vid=0&sid=2be64dcc-42fd-4ea1-9b05-01e8f0d4b947%40sessionmgr2&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=2012-01974-001&db=pdh
16.
Gibbs Jr RW. Introspection and Cognitive Linguistics: Should We Trust Our Own Intuitions? Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics [Internet]. 2006;4(1):135–51. Available from: http://web.a.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail/detail?sid=65ca89c2-e3fd-4aa3-a507-ea6aaec25319%40sessionmgr4006&vid=0&hid=4109&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=23080308&db=ufh
17.
Myers DG. Intuition: Its Powers and Perils. New Haven, [Conn.]: Yale Nota Bene; 2004.
18.
Nisbett RE, Wilson TD. Telling More Than We Can Know: Verbal Reports on Mental Processes. Psychological Review [Internet]. 1977;84(3):231–59. Available from: http://web.a.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail/detail?sid=5b1f7f84-58a6-472e-bb3e-e2470d004ca5%40sessionmgr4006&vid=0&hid=4109&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=1978-00295-001&db=pdh
19.
Libet B. The Timing of Mental Events: Libet’s Experimental Findings and Their Implications. Consciousness and Cognition. 2002;11(2):291–9.
20.
Brysbaert M, Rastle K. Historical and Conceptual Issues in Psychology [Internet]. Harlow: Pearson Education; 2009. Available from: http://ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781405874489
21.
Brysbaert M, Rastle K. Historical and Conceptual Issues in Psychology. 2nd ed. Harlow: Pearson; 2013.
22.
Sperling G. The Information Available in Brief Visual Presentations. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied [Internet]. 1960;74(11):1–29. Available from: http://web.b.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail/detail?vid=0&sid=9a143d7a-3fd6-4892-8cf5-1bc9d5d75a49%40sessionmgr1&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=2011-17733-001&db=pdh
23.
Miller GA. The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information. Psychological Review [Internet]. 1956;63(2):81–97. Available from: http://web.b.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail/detail?vid=0&sid=03e98fdc-3a19-4030-a2e2-7eb80acfec50%40sessionmgr2&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=1994-28291-001&db=pdh
24.
Dima D. Understanding Why Patients With Schizophrenia Do Not Perceive the Hollow-Mask Illusion Using Dynamic Causal Modelling. NeuroImage. 2009;46(4):1180–6.
25.
Bruce D. Lashley and the Problem of Serial Order. American Psychologist [Internet]. 1994;49(2):93–103. Available from: http://web.a.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail/detail?vid=1&sid=8fa17901-b5ee-4ab4-8bbc-38ec67aa3994%40sessionmgr4009&hid=4109&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=1994-24098-001&db=pdh
26.
Coltheart M. Cognitive Neuropsychology. In: Stevens’ Handbook of Experimental Psychology, Methodology in Experimental Psychology [Internet]. Wiley; 2002. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/0471214426.pas0404/abstract
27.
Miller GA. The Cognitive Revolution: A Historical Perspective. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2003;7(3):141–4.
28.
Watrin JP, Darwich R. On Behaviorism in the Cognitive Revolution: Myth and Reactions. Review of General Psychology [Internet]. 2012;16(3):269–82. Available from: http://web.a.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail/detail?sid=6cf06b39-b22d-41ea-876f-e5d863af6cbb%40sessionmgr4006&vid=0&hid=4109&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=2012-23422-001&db=pdh
29.
Henson R. What Can Functional Neuroimaging Tell the Experimental Psychologist? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A. 2005;58(2):193–233.
30.
Page MPA. What Can’t Functional Neuroimaging Tell the Cognitive Psychologist? Cortex. 2006 Jan;42(3):428–43.
31.
Mather M. How fMRI Can Inform Cognitive Theories. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2013;8(1):108–13.
32.
Wixted JT, Mickes L. On the Relationship Between fMRI and Theories of Cognition: The Arrow Points in Both Directions. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2013;8(1):104–7.
33.
Wager TD, Atlas LY. How Is Pain Influenced by Cognition? Neuroimaging Weighs In. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2013;8(1):91–7.
34.
Coltheart M. How Can Functional Neuroimaging Inform Cognitive Theories? Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2013;8(1):98–103.
35.
Raichle ME. Behind the Scenes of Functional Brain Imaging: A Historical and Physiological Perspective. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1998;95(3):765–72.
36.
Poldrack R. Can Cognitive Processes Be Inferred From Neuroimaging Data? Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2006;10(2):59–63.
37.
Coltheart M. What Has Functional Neuroimaging Told Us About the Organization of Mind? Cognitive Neuropsychology. 2011;28(6):397–402.
38.
Logothetis NK. What We Can Do and What We Cannot Do With fMRI. Nature. 2008;453(7197):869–78.
39.
Henson R. Forward Inference Using Functional Neuroimaging: Dissociations Versus Associations. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2006;10(2):64–9.
40.
Farah MJ. Neuroethics: The Ethical, Legal, and Societal Impact of Neuroscience. Annual Review of Psychology. 2012;63(1):571–91.
41.
Farah MJ. Functional MRI-Based Lie Detection: Scientific and Societal Challenges. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2014;15(2):123–31.
42.
Farah MJ. Neuroethics: The Practical and the Philosophical. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2005;9(1):34–40.
43.
Lockwood PL. Association of Callous Traits with Reduced Neural Response to Others’ Pain in Children with Conduct Problems. Current Biology. 2013;23(10):901–5.
44.
Nishimoto S. Reconstructing Visual Experiences from Brain Activity Evoked by Natural Movies. Current Biology. 2011;21(19):1641–6.
45.
Owen AM. Detecting Awareness in the Vegetative State. Science [Internet]. 2006;313(5792):1402–1402. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3847019
46.
Phelps EA. Performance on Indirect Measures of Race Evaluation Predicts Amygdala Activation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2000;12(5):729–38.
47.
Brysbaert M, Rastle K. Historical and Conceptual Issues in Psychology. 2nd ed. Harlow: Pearson; 2013.
48.
Brysbaert M, Rastle K. Historical and Conceptual Issues in Psychology [Internet]. Harlow: Pearson Education; 2009. Available from: http://ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781405874489
49.
Bennett M. The Motor System in Neuroscience: A History and Analysis of Conceptual Developments. Progress in Neurobiology. 2002;67(1):1–52.
50.
López-Muñoz F. Neuron Theory, the Cornerstone of Neuroscience, on the Centenary of the Nobel Prize Award to Santiago Ramón Y Cajal. Brain Research Bulletin. 2006;70(4–6):391–405.
51.
Crivellato E, Ribatti D. Soul, Mind, Brain: Greek Philosophy and the Birth of Neuroscience. Brain Research Bulletin. 2007;71(4):327–36.
52.
Pevsner J. Leonardo Da Vinci’s Contributions to Neuroscience. Trends in Neurosciences. 2002;25(4):217–20.
53.
Bennett MR. The Early History of the Synapse: From Plato to Sherrington. Brain Research Bulletin. 1999;50(2):95–118.
54.
Buss DM. Evolutionary Psychology: A New Paradigm for Psychological Science. Psychological Inquiry [Internet]. 1995;6(1):1–30. Available from: https://www-jstor-org.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/stable/1449568?sid=primo&seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
55.
Cosmides L, Tooby J. Evolutionary Psychology: A Primer [Internet]. Available from: https://www.cep.ucsb.edu/primer.html
56.
Buller DJ. Evolutionary Psychology: The Emperor’s New Paradigm. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2005;9(6):277–83.
57.
Buss DM, Schmitt DP. Sexual Strategies Theory: An Evolutionary Perspective on Human Mating. Psychological Review. 1993;100(2):204–32.
58.
Bolhuis JJ. Darwin in Mind: New Opportunities for Evolutionary Psychology. PLoS Biology. 2011;9(7).
59.
Brysbaert M, Rastle K. Historical and Conceptual Issues in Psychology. 2nd ed. Harlow: Pearson; 2013.
60.
Brysbaert M, Rastle K. Historical and Conceptual Issues in Psychology [Internet]. Harlow: Pearson Education; 2009. Available from: http://ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781405874489
61.
Gould SJ. Morton’s Ranking of Races by Cranial Capacity. Science [Internet]. 1978;200. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1746562
62.
Ibn-Tamas v. United States :: 1979 :: District of Columbia Court of Appeals Decisions :: District of Columbia Case Law :: District of Columbia Law :: US Law :: Justia [Internet]. Available from: https://law.justia.com/cases/district-of-columbia/court-of-appeals/1979/12614-2.html
63.
Kagan J. Historical Selection. Review of General Psychology [Internet]. 2009;13(1):77–88. Available from: http://web.a.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail/detail?sid=84b14040-2c05-4f4d-9993-81b72bc3a590%40sessionmgr4009&vid=0&hid=4109&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=2009-02787-008&db=pdh
64.
Lewis JE. The Mismeasure of Science: Stephen Jay Gould versus Samuel George Morton on Skulls and Bias. PLoS Biology. 2011;9(6).
65.
Schuller RA, Vidmar N. Battered Woman Syndrome Evidence in the Courtroom: A Review of the Literature. Law and Human Behavior [Internet]. 1992;16(3):273–91. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1394072
66.
Silverman FH. The "Monster” Study. Journal of Fluency Disorders. 1988;13(3):225–31.
67.
Weindling P. The Origins of Informed Consent: The International Scientific Commission on Medical War Crimes, and the Nuremburg Code. Bulletin of the History of Medicine [Internet]. 2001;75(1):37–71. Available from: https://muse.jhu.edu/article/4648
68.
Welch BL. Moral Drift and the American Psychological Association: The Road to Torture. Social Justice [Internet]. 2010;37(2/3 (120-121)):175–82. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41336990?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
69.
Zimbardo PG. Does Psychology Make a Significant Difference in Our Lives? American Psychologist [Internet]. 2004;59(5):339–51. Available from: http://web.a.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail/detail?vid=1&sid=d9aef89d-0f7a-450a-a081-540ce4d31406%40sessionmgr4010&hid=4109&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=2004-16479-003&db=pdh
70.
Brysbaert M, Rastle K. Historical and Conceptual Issues in Psychology. 2nd ed. Harlow: Pearson; 2013.
71.
Brysbaert M, Rastle K. Historical and Conceptual Issues in Psychology [Internet]. Harlow: Pearson Education; 2009. Available from: http://ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781405874489
72.
van Strien PJ. Early Applied Psychology Between Essentialism and Pragmatism: The Dynamics of Theory, Tools, and Clients. History of Psychology [Internet]. 1998;1(3):205–34. Available from: http://web.b.ebscohost.com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/ehost/detail/detail?vid=0&sid=68037173-4349-45b7-aa73-ce6df93dab70%40pdc-v-sessmgr03&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=1998-10118-002&db=pdh
73.
Johanningmeier EV, Hale M. Hugo Munsterberg. History of Education Quarterly. 1983;23(2).
74.
James W. A Plea for Psychology as a ‘Natural Science’. The Philosophical Review. 1892;1(2).
75.
Welford AT. Fundamentals of skill. London: Methuen; 1968.
76.
Borries C, Launhardt K, Epplen C, Epplen JîT, Winkler P. DNA analyses support the hypothesis that infanticide is adaptive in langur monkeys. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences. 1999 May 7;266(1422):901–4.
77.
Daly M, Wilson M. The ‘Cinderella effect’ is no fairy tale. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2005 Nov;9(11):507–8.
78.
Fisher SE. Human Genetics: The Evolving Story of FOXP2. Current Biology. 2019 Jan;29(2):R65–7.
79.
Laland KN, Odling-Smee J, Myles S. How culture shaped the human genome: bringing genetics and the human sciences together. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2010 Feb;11(2):137–48.
80.
Marcus GF, Fisher SE. FOXP2 in focus: what can genes tell us about speech and language? Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2003 Jun;7(6):257–62.
81.
Pardiñas AF, Holmans P, Pocklington AJ, Escott-Price V, Ripke S, Carrera N, et al. Common schizophrenia alleles are enriched in mutation-intolerant genes and in regions under strong background selection. Nature Genetics. 2018 Mar;50(3):381–9.
82.
The impact of order incongruence between a task-irrelevant auditory sequence and a task-relevant visual sequence.(Author Abstract). 2005; Available from: https://librarysearch.royalholloway.ac.uk/primo-explore/search?query=any,contains,order%20incongruence%20hughes%20jones&tab=tab1&search_scope=LSCOP_44ROY_ALL&sortby=date&vid=44ROY_VU2&facet=frbrgroupid,include,5836150054024640536&lang=en_US&offset=0