1.
Brysbaert, M., Rastle, K.: Historical and Conceptual Issues in Psychology. Pearson, Harlow (2013).
2.
Brysbaert, M., Rastle, K.: Historical and Conceptual Issues in Psychology. Pearson Education, Harlow (2009).
3.
Chalmers, A.F.: What Is This Thing Called Science? Open University Press, Maidenhead (1999).
4.
Hedges, L.V.: How Hard Is Hard Science, How Soft Is Soft Science? the Empirical Cumulativeness of Research. American Psychologist. 42, 443–455 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.42.5.443.
5.
Lilienfeld, S.O.: Public Skepticism of Psychology: Why Many People Perceive the Study of Human Behavior as Unscientific. American Psychologist. 67, (2012).
6.
Kumar, N.: Karl Popper, Psychology and Philosophy. Psychological Studies. 55, 270–274 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-010-0032-3.
7.
Rowbottom, D.P.: Kuhn vs. Popper on criticism and dogmatism in science: a resolution at the group level. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. 42, 117–124 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2010.11.031.
8.
Fuller, S.: Kuhn vs. Popper: The Struggle for the Soul of Science, http://www.collier.sts.vt.edu/5306/kuhnpopper.pdf, (2003).
9.
Brysbaert, M., Rastle, K.: Historical and Conceptual Issues in Psychology. Pearson, Harlow (2013).
10.
Brysbaert, M., Rastle, K.: Historical and Conceptual Issues in Psychology. Pearson Education, Harlow (2009).
11.
Carpenter, S.: Some Neglected Contributions of Wilhelm Wundt to the Psychology of Memory, http://public.psych.iastate.edu/shacarp/carpenter_2005.pdf, (2005).
12.
Tolman, E.C.: Cognitive Maps in Rats and Men. Psychological Review. 55, 189–208 (1948). https://doi.org/10.1037/h0061626.
13.
Danziger, K.: The History of Introspection Reconsidered [open access]. Journal of the History of Behaviour Sciences. 16, (1980).
14.
Dutton, D.G., Aron, A.P.: Some Evidence for Heightened Sexual Attraction Under Conditions of High Anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 30, 510–517 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1037/h0037031.
15.
Fridlund, A.J.: Little Albert: A Neurologically Impaired Child. History of Psychology. 15, 302–327 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026720.
16.
Gibbs Jr, R.W.: Introspection and Cognitive Linguistics: Should We Trust Our Own Intuitions? Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics. 4, 135–151 (2006).
17.
Myers, D.G.: Intuition: Its Powers and Perils. Yale Nota Bene, New Haven, [Conn.] (2004).
18.
Nisbett, R.E., Wilson, T.D.: Telling More Than We Can Know: Verbal Reports on Mental Processes. Psychological Review. 84, 231–259 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.3.231.
19.
Libet, B.: The Timing of Mental Events: Libet’s Experimental Findings and Their Implications. Consciousness and Cognition. 11, 291–299 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1006/ccog.2002.0568.
20.
Brysbaert, M., Rastle, K.: Historical and Conceptual Issues in Psychology. Pearson Education, Harlow (2009).
21.
Brysbaert, M., Rastle, K.: Historical and Conceptual Issues in Psychology. Pearson, Harlow (2013).
22.
Sperling, G.: The Information Available in Brief Visual Presentations. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied. 74, 1–29 (1960). https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093759.
23.
Miller, G.A.: The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information. Psychological Review. 63, 81–97 (1956). https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043158.
24.
Dima, D.: Understanding Why Patients With Schizophrenia Do Not Perceive the Hollow-Mask Illusion Using Dynamic Causal Modelling. NeuroImage. 46, 1180–1186 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.03.033.
25.
Bruce, D.: Lashley and the Problem of Serial Order. American Psychologist. 49, 93–103 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.49.2.93.
26.
Coltheart, M.: Cognitive Neuropsychology. In: Stevens’ Handbook of Experimental Psychology, Methodology in Experimental Psychology. Wiley (2002).
27.
Miller, G.A.: The Cognitive Revolution: A Historical Perspective. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 7, 141–144 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00029-9.
28.
Watrin, J.P., Darwich, R.: On Behaviorism in the Cognitive Revolution: Myth and Reactions. Review of General Psychology. 16, 269–282 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026766.
29.
Henson, R.: What Can Functional Neuroimaging Tell the Experimental Psychologist? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A. 58, 193–233 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1080/02724980443000502.
30.
Page, M.P.A.: What Can’t Functional Neuroimaging Tell the Cognitive Psychologist? Cortex. 42, 428–443 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70375-7.
31.
Mather, M.: How fMRI Can Inform Cognitive Theories. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 8, 108–113 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612469037.
32.
Wixted, J.T., Mickes, L.: On the Relationship Between fMRI and Theories of Cognition: The Arrow Points in Both Directions. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 8, 104–107 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612469022.
33.
Wager, T.D., Atlas, L.Y.: How Is Pain Influenced by Cognition? Neuroimaging Weighs In. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 8, 91–97 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612469631.
34.
Coltheart, M.: How Can Functional Neuroimaging Inform Cognitive Theories? Perspectives on Psychological Science. 8, 98–103 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612469208.
35.
Raichle, M.E.: Behind the Scenes of Functional Brain Imaging: A Historical and Physiological Perspective. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 95, 765–772 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.3.765.
36.
Poldrack, R.: Can Cognitive Processes Be Inferred From Neuroimaging Data? Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 10, 59–63 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.12.004.
37.
Coltheart, M.: What Has Functional Neuroimaging Told Us About the Organization of Mind? Cognitive Neuropsychology. 28, 397–402 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2012.666964.
38.
Logothetis, N.K.: What We Can Do and What We Cannot Do With fMRI. Nature. 453, 869–878 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06976.
39.
Henson, R.: Forward Inference Using Functional Neuroimaging: Dissociations Versus Associations. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 10, 64–69 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.12.005.
40.
Farah, M.J.: Neuroethics: The Ethical, Legal, and Societal Impact of Neuroscience. Annual Review of Psychology. 63, 571–591 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100438.
41.
Farah, M.J.: Functional MRI-Based Lie Detection: Scientific and Societal Challenges. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 15, 123–131 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3665.
42.
Farah, M.J.: Neuroethics: The Practical and the Philosophical. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 9, 34–40 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.12.001.
43.
Lockwood, P.L.: Association of Callous Traits with Reduced Neural Response to Others’ Pain in Children with Conduct Problems. Current Biology. 23, 901–905 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2013.04.018.
44.
Nishimoto, S.: Reconstructing Visual Experiences from Brain Activity Evoked by Natural Movies. Current Biology. 21, 1641–1646 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2011.08.031.
45.
Owen, A.M.: Detecting Awareness in the Vegetative State. Science. 313, 1402–1402 (2006).
46.
Phelps, E.A.: Performance on Indirect Measures of Race Evaluation Predicts Amygdala Activation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 12, 729–738 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1162/089892900562552.
47.
Brysbaert, M., Rastle, K.: Historical and Conceptual Issues in Psychology. Pearson, Harlow (2013).
48.
Brysbaert, M., Rastle, K.: Historical and Conceptual Issues in Psychology. Pearson Education, Harlow (2009).
49.
Bennett, M.: The Motor System in Neuroscience: A History and Analysis of Conceptual Developments. Progress in Neurobiology. 67, 1–52 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-0082(02)00012-6.
50.
López-Muñoz, F.: Neuron Theory, the Cornerstone of Neuroscience, on the Centenary of the Nobel Prize Award to Santiago Ramón Y Cajal. Brain Research Bulletin. 70, 391–405 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2006.07.010.
51.
Crivellato, E., Ribatti, D.: Soul, Mind, Brain: Greek Philosophy and the Birth of Neuroscience. Brain Research Bulletin. 71, 327–336 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2006.09.020.
52.
Pevsner, J.: Leonardo Da Vinci’s Contributions to Neuroscience. Trends in Neurosciences. 25, 217–220 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-2236(00)02121-4.
53.
Bennett, M.R.: The Early History of the Synapse: From Plato to Sherrington. Brain Research Bulletin. 50, 95–118 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-9230(99)00094-5.
54.
Buss, D.M.: Evolutionary Psychology: A New Paradigm for Psychological Science. Psychological Inquiry. 6, 1–30 (1995).
55.
Cosmides, L., Tooby, J.: Evolutionary Psychology: A Primer.
56.
Buller, D.J.: Evolutionary Psychology: The Emperor’s New Paradigm. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 9, 277–283 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.04.003.
57.
Buss, D.M., Schmitt, D.P.: Sexual Strategies Theory: An Evolutionary Perspective on Human Mating. Psychological Review. 100, 204–232 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.100.2.204.
58.
Bolhuis, J.J.: Darwin in Mind: New Opportunities for Evolutionary Psychology. PLoS Biology. 9, (2011). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001109.
59.
Brysbaert, M., Rastle, K.: Historical and Conceptual Issues in Psychology. Pearson, Harlow (2013).
60.
Brysbaert, M., Rastle, K.: Historical and Conceptual Issues in Psychology. Pearson Education, Harlow (2009).
61.
Gould, S.J.: Morton’s Ranking of Races by Cranial Capacity. Science. 200, (1978).
62.
Ibn-Tamas v. United States :: 1979 :: District of Columbia Court of Appeals Decisions :: District of Columbia Case Law :: District of Columbia Law :: US Law :: Justia, https://law.justia.com/cases/district-of-columbia/court-of-appeals/1979/12614-2.html.
63.
Kagan, J.: Historical Selection. Review of General Psychology. 13, 77–88 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014228.
64.
Lewis, J.E.: The Mismeasure of Science: Stephen Jay Gould versus Samuel George Morton on Skulls and Bias. PLoS Biology. 9, (2011). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001071.
65.
Schuller, R.A., Vidmar, N.: Battered Woman Syndrome Evidence in the Courtroom: A Review of the Literature. Law and Human Behavior. 16, 273–291 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01044770.
66.
Silverman, F.H.: The "Monster” Study. Journal of Fluency Disorders. 13, 225–231 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1016/0094-730X(88)90049-6.
67.
Weindling, P.: The Origins of Informed Consent: The International Scientific Commission on Medical War Crimes, and the Nuremburg Code. Bulletin of the History of Medicine. 75, 37–71 (2001).
68.
Welch, B.L.: Moral Drift and the American Psychological Association: The Road to Torture. Social Justice. 37, 175–182 (2010).
69.
Zimbardo, P.G.: Does Psychology Make a Significant Difference in Our Lives? American Psychologist. 59, 339–351 (2004).
70.
Brysbaert, M., Rastle, K.: Historical and Conceptual Issues in Psychology. Pearson, Harlow (2013).
71.
Brysbaert, M., Rastle, K.: Historical and Conceptual Issues in Psychology. Pearson Education, Harlow (2009).
72.
van Strien, P.J.: Early Applied Psychology Between Essentialism and Pragmatism: The Dynamics of Theory, Tools, and Clients. History of Psychology. 1, 205–234 (1998).
73.
Johanningmeier, E.V., Hale, M.: Hugo Munsterberg. History of Education Quarterly. 23, (1983). https://doi.org/10.2307/368162.
74.
James, W.: A Plea for Psychology as a ‘Natural Science’. The Philosophical Review. 1, (1892). https://doi.org/10.2307/2175743.
75.
Welford, A.T.: Fundamentals of skill. Methuen, London (1968).
76.
Borries, C., Launhardt, K., Epplen, C., Epplen, Jî.T., Winkler, P.: DNA analyses support the hypothesis that infanticide is adaptive in langur monkeys. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences. 266, 901–904 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1999.0721.
77.
Daly, M., Wilson, M.: The ‘Cinderella effect’ is no fairy tale. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 9, 507–508 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.09.007.
78.
Fisher, S.E.: Human Genetics: The Evolving Story of FOXP2. Current Biology. 29, R65–R67 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2018.11.047.
79.
Laland, K.N., Odling-Smee, J., Myles, S.: How culture shaped the human genome: bringing genetics and the human sciences together. Nature Reviews Genetics. 11, 137–148 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2734.
80.
Marcus, G.F., Fisher, S.E.: FOXP2 in focus: what can genes tell us about speech and language? Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 7, 257–262 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00104-9.
81.
Pardiñas, A.F., Holmans, P., Pocklington, A.J., Escott-Price, V., Ripke, S., Carrera, N., Legge, S.E., Bishop, S., Cameron, D., Hamshere, M.L., Han, J., Hubbard, L., Lynham, A., Mantripragada, K., Rees, E., MacCabe, J.H., McCarroll, S.A., Baune, B.T., Breen, G., Byrne, E.M., Dannlowski, U., Eley, T.C., Hayward, C., Martin, N.G., McIntosh, A.M., Plomin, R., Porteous, D.J., Wray, N.R., Caballero, A., Geschwind, D.H., Huckins, L.M., Ruderfer, D.M., Santiago, E., Sklar, P., Stahl, E.A., Won, H., Agerbo, E., Als, T.D., Andreassen, O.A., Bækvad-Hansen, M., Mortensen, P.B., Pedersen, C.B., Børglum, A.D., Bybjerg-Grauholm, J., Djurovic, S., Durmishi, N., Pedersen, M.G., Golimbet, V., Grove, J., Hougaard, D.M.: Common schizophrenia alleles are enriched in mutation-intolerant genes and in regions under strong background selection. Nature Genetics. 50, 381–389 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-018-0059-2.
82.
The impact of order incongruence between a task-irrelevant auditory sequence and a task-relevant visual sequence.(Author Abstract). (2005).