1.
Brysbaert M, Rastle K. Historical and Conceptual Issues in Psychology. 2nd ed. Harlow: Pearson; 2013.
2.
Brysbaert M, Rastle K. Historical and Conceptual Issues in Psychology [Internet]. Harlow: Pearson Education; 2009. Available from: http://ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781405874489
3.
Chalmers AF. What Is This Thing Called Science? 3rd ed. Maidenhead: Open University Press; 1999.
4.
Hedges LV. How Hard Is Hard Science, How Soft Is Soft Science? the Empirical Cumulativeness of Research. American Psychologist [Internet]. 1987;42(5):443–455. Available from: http://web.a.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail/detail?vid=1&sid=62de742c-ee68-43c4-8cab-4ceb62d395f3%40sessionmgr4010&hid=4109&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=1987-26934-001&db=pdh
5.
Lilienfeld SO. Public Skepticism of Psychology: Why Many People Perceive the Study of Human Behavior as Unscientific. American Psychologist [Internet]. 2012;67(2). Available from: http://web.a.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail/detail?vid=1&sid=6d759316-824d-4168-a238-5faa05c315a0%40sessionmgr4010&hid=4109&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=2011-12007-001&db=pdh
6.
Kumar N. Karl Popper, Psychology and Philosophy. Psychological Studies. 2010;55(3):270–274.
7.
Rowbottom DP. Kuhn vs. Popper on criticism and dogmatism in science: a resolution at the group level. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. 2011 Mar;42(1):117–124.
8.
Fuller S. Kuhn vs. Popper: The Struggle for the Soul of Science [Internet]. 2003. Available from: http://www.collier.sts.vt.edu/5306/kuhnpopper.pdf
9.
Brysbaert M, Rastle K. Historical and Conceptual Issues in Psychology. 2nd ed. Harlow: Pearson; 2013.
10.
Brysbaert M, Rastle K. Historical and Conceptual Issues in Psychology [Internet]. Harlow: Pearson Education; 2009. Available from: http://ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781405874489
11.
Carpenter S. Some Neglected Contributions of Wilhelm Wundt to the Psychology of Memory [Internet]. 2005. Available from: http://public.psych.iastate.edu/shacarp/carpenter_2005.pdf
12.
Tolman EC. Cognitive Maps in Rats and Men. Psychological Review. 1948;55(4):189–208.
13.
Danziger K. The History of Introspection Reconsidered [open access]. Journal of the History of Behaviour Sciences [Internet]. 1980;16(3). Available from: http://www.kurtdanziger.com/hist%20introsp.pdf
14.
Dutton DG, Aron AP. Some Evidence for Heightened Sexual Attraction Under Conditions of High Anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology [Internet]. 1974;30(4):510–517. Available from: http://web.a.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail/detail?sid=2fa2ff6e-e843-4b21-afa9-b96a764a6a98%40sessionmgr4009&vid=0&hid=4109&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=1975-03016-001&db=pdh
15.
Fridlund AJ. Little Albert: A Neurologically Impaired Child. History of Psychology [Internet]. 2012;15(4):302–327. Available from: http://web.b.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail/detail?vid=0&sid=2be64dcc-42fd-4ea1-9b05-01e8f0d4b947%40sessionmgr2&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=2012-01974-001&db=pdh
16.
Gibbs Jr RW. Introspection and Cognitive Linguistics: Should We Trust Our Own Intuitions? Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics [Internet]. 2006;4(1):135–151. Available from: http://web.a.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail/detail?sid=65ca89c2-e3fd-4aa3-a507-ea6aaec25319%40sessionmgr4006&vid=0&hid=4109&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=23080308&db=ufh
17.
Myers DG. Intuition: Its Powers and Perils. New Haven, [Conn.]: Yale Nota Bene; 2004.
18.
Nisbett RE, Wilson TD. Telling More Than We Can Know: Verbal Reports on Mental Processes. Psychological Review [Internet]. 1977;84(3):231–259. Available from: http://web.a.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail/detail?sid=5b1f7f84-58a6-472e-bb3e-e2470d004ca5%40sessionmgr4006&vid=0&hid=4109&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=1978-00295-001&db=pdh
19.
Libet B. The Timing of Mental Events: Libet’s Experimental Findings and Their Implications. Consciousness and Cognition. 2002;11(2):291–299.
20.
Brysbaert M, Rastle K. Historical and Conceptual Issues in Psychology [Internet]. Harlow: Pearson Education; 2009. Available from: http://ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781405874489
21.
Brysbaert M, Rastle K. Historical and Conceptual Issues in Psychology. 2nd ed. Harlow: Pearson; 2013.
22.
Sperling G. The Information Available in Brief Visual Presentations. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied [Internet]. 1960;74(11):1–29. Available from: http://web.b.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail/detail?vid=0&sid=9a143d7a-3fd6-4892-8cf5-1bc9d5d75a49%40sessionmgr1&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=2011-17733-001&db=pdh
23.
Miller GA. The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information. Psychological Review [Internet]. 1956;63(2):81–97. Available from: http://web.b.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail/detail?vid=0&sid=03e98fdc-3a19-4030-a2e2-7eb80acfec50%40sessionmgr2&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=1994-28291-001&db=pdh
24.
Dima D. Understanding Why Patients With Schizophrenia Do Not Perceive the Hollow-Mask Illusion Using Dynamic Causal Modelling. NeuroImage. 2009;46(4):1180–1186.
25.
Bruce D. Lashley and the Problem of Serial Order. American Psychologist [Internet]. 1994;49(2):93–103. Available from: http://web.a.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail/detail?vid=1&sid=8fa17901-b5ee-4ab4-8bbc-38ec67aa3994%40sessionmgr4009&hid=4109&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=1994-24098-001&db=pdh
26.
Coltheart M. Cognitive Neuropsychology. Stevens’ Handbook of Experimental Psychology, Methodology in Experimental Psychology [Internet]. Wiley; 2002. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/0471214426.pas0404/abstract
27.
Miller GA. The Cognitive Revolution: A Historical Perspective. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2003;7(3):141–144.
28.
Watrin JP, Darwich R. On Behaviorism in the Cognitive Revolution: Myth and Reactions. Review of General Psychology [Internet]. 2012;16(3):269–282. Available from: http://web.a.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail/detail?sid=6cf06b39-b22d-41ea-876f-e5d863af6cbb%40sessionmgr4006&vid=0&hid=4109&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=2012-23422-001&db=pdh
29.
Henson R. What Can Functional Neuroimaging Tell the Experimental Psychologist? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A. 2005;58(2):193–233.
30.
Page MPA. What Can’t Functional Neuroimaging Tell the Cognitive Psychologist? Cortex. 2006 Jan;42(3):428–443.
31.
Mather M. How fMRI Can Inform Cognitive Theories. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2013;8(1):108–113.
32.
Wixted JT, Mickes L. On the Relationship Between fMRI and Theories of Cognition: The Arrow Points in Both Directions. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2013;8(1):104–107.
33.
Wager TD, Atlas LY. How Is Pain Influenced by Cognition? Neuroimaging Weighs In. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2013;8(1):91–97.
34.
Coltheart M. How Can Functional Neuroimaging Inform Cognitive Theories? Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2013;8(1):98–103.
35.
Raichle ME. Behind the Scenes of Functional Brain Imaging: A Historical and Physiological Perspective. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1998;95(3):765–772.
36.
Poldrack R. Can Cognitive Processes Be Inferred From Neuroimaging Data? Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2006;10(2):59–63.
37.
Coltheart M. What Has Functional Neuroimaging Told Us About the Organization of Mind? Cognitive Neuropsychology. 2011;28(6):397–402.
38.
Logothetis NK. What We Can Do and What We Cannot Do With fMRI. Nature. 2008;453(7197):869–878.
39.
Henson R. Forward Inference Using Functional Neuroimaging: Dissociations Versus Associations. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2006;10(2):64–69.
40.
Farah MJ. Neuroethics: The Ethical, Legal, and Societal Impact of Neuroscience. Annual Review of Psychology. 2012;63(1):571–591.
41.
Farah MJ. Functional MRI-Based Lie Detection: Scientific and Societal Challenges. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2014;15(2):123–131.
42.
Farah MJ. Neuroethics: The Practical and the Philosophical. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2005;9(1):34–40.
43.
Lockwood PL. Association of Callous Traits with Reduced Neural Response to Others’ Pain in Children with Conduct Problems. Current Biology. 2013;23(10):901–905.
44.
Nishimoto S. Reconstructing Visual Experiences from Brain Activity Evoked by Natural Movies. Current Biology. 2011;21(19):1641–1646.
45.
Owen AM. Detecting Awareness in the Vegetative State. Science [Internet]. 2006;313(5792):1402–1402. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3847019
46.
Phelps EA. Performance on Indirect Measures of Race Evaluation Predicts Amygdala Activation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2000;12(5):729–738.
47.
Brysbaert M, Rastle K. Historical and Conceptual Issues in Psychology. 2nd ed. Harlow: Pearson; 2013.
48.
Brysbaert M, Rastle K. Historical and Conceptual Issues in Psychology [Internet]. Harlow: Pearson Education; 2009. Available from: http://ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781405874489
49.
Bennett M. The Motor System in Neuroscience: A History and Analysis of Conceptual Developments. Progress in Neurobiology. 2002;67(1):1–52.
50.
López-Muñoz F. Neuron Theory, the Cornerstone of Neuroscience, on the Centenary of the Nobel Prize Award to Santiago Ramón Y Cajal. Brain Research Bulletin. 2006;70(4–6):391–405.
51.
Crivellato E, Ribatti D. Soul, Mind, Brain: Greek Philosophy and the Birth of Neuroscience. Brain Research Bulletin. 2007;71(4):327–336.
52.
Pevsner J. Leonardo Da Vinci’s Contributions to Neuroscience. Trends in Neurosciences. 2002;25(4):217–220.
53.
Bennett MR. The Early History of the Synapse: From Plato to Sherrington. Brain Research Bulletin. 1999;50(2):95–118.
54.
Buss DM. Evolutionary Psychology: A New Paradigm for Psychological Science. Psychological Inquiry [Internet]. 1995;6(1):1–30. Available from: https://www-jstor-org.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/stable/1449568?sid=primo&seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
55.
Cosmides L, Tooby J. Evolutionary Psychology: A Primer [Internet]. Available from: https://www.cep.ucsb.edu/primer.html
56.
Buller DJ. Evolutionary Psychology: The Emperor’s New Paradigm. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2005;9(6):277–283.
57.
Buss DM, Schmitt DP. Sexual Strategies Theory: An Evolutionary Perspective on Human Mating. Psychological Review. 1993;100(2):204–232.
58.
Bolhuis JJ. Darwin in Mind: New Opportunities for Evolutionary Psychology. PLoS Biology. 2011;9(7).
59.
Brysbaert M, Rastle K. Historical and Conceptual Issues in Psychology. 2nd ed. Harlow: Pearson; 2013.
60.
Brysbaert M, Rastle K. Historical and Conceptual Issues in Psychology [Internet]. Harlow: Pearson Education; 2009. Available from: http://ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781405874489
61.
Gould SJ. Morton’s Ranking of Races by Cranial Capacity. Science [Internet]. 1978;200. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1746562
62.
Ibn-Tamas v. United States :: 1979 :: District of Columbia Court of Appeals Decisions :: District of Columbia Case Law :: District of Columbia Law :: US Law :: Justia [Internet]. Available from: https://law.justia.com/cases/district-of-columbia/court-of-appeals/1979/12614-2.html
63.
Kagan J. Historical Selection. Review of General Psychology [Internet]. 2009;13(1):77–88. Available from: http://web.a.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail/detail?sid=84b14040-2c05-4f4d-9993-81b72bc3a590%40sessionmgr4009&vid=0&hid=4109&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=2009-02787-008&db=pdh
64.
Lewis JE. The Mismeasure of Science: Stephen Jay Gould versus Samuel George Morton on Skulls and Bias. PLoS Biology. 2011;9(6).
65.
Schuller RA, Vidmar N. Battered Woman Syndrome Evidence in the Courtroom: A Review of the Literature. Law and Human Behavior [Internet]. 1992;16(3):273–291. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1394072
66.
Silverman FH. The "Monster” Study. Journal of Fluency Disorders. 1988;13(3):225–231.
67.
Weindling P. The Origins of Informed Consent: The International Scientific Commission on Medical War Crimes, and the Nuremburg Code. Bulletin of the History of Medicine [Internet]. 2001;75(1):37–71. Available from: https://muse.jhu.edu/article/4648
68.
Welch BL. Moral Drift and the American Psychological Association: The Road to Torture. Social Justice [Internet]. 2010;37(2/3 (120-121)):175–182. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41336990?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
69.
Zimbardo PG. Does Psychology Make a Significant Difference in Our Lives? American Psychologist [Internet]. 2004;59(5):339–351. Available from: http://web.a.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail/detail?vid=1&sid=d9aef89d-0f7a-450a-a081-540ce4d31406%40sessionmgr4010&hid=4109&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=2004-16479-003&db=pdh
70.
Brysbaert M, Rastle K. Historical and Conceptual Issues in Psychology. 2nd ed. Harlow: Pearson; 2013.
71.
Brysbaert M, Rastle K. Historical and Conceptual Issues in Psychology [Internet]. Harlow: Pearson Education; 2009. Available from: http://ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781405874489
72.
van Strien PJ. Early Applied Psychology Between Essentialism and Pragmatism: The Dynamics of Theory, Tools, and Clients. History of Psychology [Internet]. 1998;1(3):205–234. Available from: http://web.b.ebscohost.com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/ehost/detail/detail?vid=0&sid=68037173-4349-45b7-aa73-ce6df93dab70%40pdc-v-sessmgr03&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=1998-10118-002&db=pdh
73.
Johanningmeier EV, Hale M. Hugo Munsterberg. History of Education Quarterly. 1983;23(2).
74.
James W. A Plea for Psychology as a ‘Natural Science’. The Philosophical Review. 1892;1(2).
75.
Welford AT. Fundamentals of skill. London: Methuen; 1968.
76.
Borries C, Launhardt K, Epplen C, Epplen JîT, Winkler P. DNA analyses support the hypothesis that infanticide is adaptive in langur monkeys. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences. 1999 May 7;266(1422):901–904.
77.
Daly M, Wilson M. The ‘Cinderella effect’ is no fairy tale. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2005 Nov;9(11):507–508.
78.
Fisher SE. Human Genetics: The Evolving Story of FOXP2. Current Biology. 2019 Jan;29(2):R65–R67.
79.
Laland KN, Odling-Smee J, Myles S. How culture shaped the human genome: bringing genetics and the human sciences together. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2010 Feb;11(2):137–148.
80.
Marcus GF, Fisher SE. FOXP2 in focus: what can genes tell us about speech and language? Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2003 Jun;7(6):257–262.
81.
Pardiñas AF, Holmans P, Pocklington AJ, Escott-Price V, Ripke S, Carrera N, Legge SE, Bishop S, Cameron D, Hamshere ML, Han J, Hubbard L, Lynham A, Mantripragada K, Rees E, MacCabe JH, McCarroll SA, Baune BT, Breen G, Byrne EM, Dannlowski U, Eley TC, Hayward C, Martin NG, McIntosh AM, Plomin R, Porteous DJ, Wray NR, Caballero A, Geschwind DH, Huckins LM, Ruderfer DM, Santiago E, Sklar P, Stahl EA, Won H, Agerbo E, Als TD, Andreassen OA, Bækvad-Hansen M, Mortensen PB, Pedersen CB, Børglum AD, Bybjerg-Grauholm J, Djurovic S, Durmishi N, Pedersen MG, Golimbet V, Grove J, Hougaard DM. Common schizophrenia alleles are enriched in mutation-intolerant genes and in regions under strong background selection. Nature Genetics. 2018 Mar;50(3):381–389.
82.
The impact of order incongruence between a task-irrelevant auditory sequence and a task-relevant visual sequence.(Author Abstract). 2005; Available from: https://librarysearch.royalholloway.ac.uk/primo-explore/search?query=any,contains,order%20incongruence%20hughes%20jones&tab=tab1&search_scope=LSCOP_44ROY_ALL&sortby=date&vid=44ROY_VU2&facet=frbrgroupid,include,5836150054024640536&lang=en_US&offset=0
