1.
Brysbaert M, Rastle K. Historical and Conceptual Issues in Psychology. 2nd ed. Pearson; 2013.
2.
Brysbaert M, Rastle K. Historical and Conceptual Issues in Psychology. Pearson Education; 2009. http://ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781405874489
3.
Chalmers AF. What Is This Thing Called Science? 3rd ed. Open University Press; 1999.
4.
Hedges LV. How Hard Is Hard Science, How Soft Is Soft Science? the Empirical Cumulativeness of Research. American Psychologist. 1987;42(5):443-455. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.42.5.443
5.
Lilienfeld SO. Public Skepticism of Psychology: Why Many People Perceive the Study of Human Behavior as Unscientific. American Psychologist. 2012;67(2). http://web.a.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail/detail?vid=1&sid=6d759316-824d-4168-a238-5faa05c315a0%40sessionmgr4010&hid=4109&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=2011-12007-001&db=pdh
6.
Kumar N. Karl Popper, Psychology and Philosophy. Psychological Studies. 2010;55(3):270-274. doi:10.1007/s12646-010-0032-3
7.
Rowbottom DP. Kuhn vs. Popper on criticism and dogmatism in science: a resolution at the group level. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. 2011;42(1):117-124. doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2010.11.031
8.
Fuller S. Kuhn vs. Popper: The Struggle for the Soul of Science. Published online 2003. http://www.collier.sts.vt.edu/5306/kuhnpopper.pdf
9.
Brysbaert M, Rastle K. Historical and Conceptual Issues in Psychology. 2nd ed. Pearson; 2013.
10.
Brysbaert M, Rastle K. Historical and Conceptual Issues in Psychology. Pearson Education; 2009. http://ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781405874489
11.
Carpenter S. Some Neglected Contributions of Wilhelm Wundt to the Psychology of Memory. Published online 2005. http://public.psych.iastate.edu/shacarp/carpenter_2005.pdf
12.
Tolman EC. Cognitive Maps in Rats and Men. Psychological Review. 1948;55(4):189-208. doi:10.1037/h0061626
13.
Danziger K. The History of Introspection Reconsidered [open access]. Journal of the History of Behaviour Sciences. 1980;16(3). http://www.kurtdanziger.com/hist%20introsp.pdf
14.
Dutton DG, Aron AP. Some Evidence for Heightened Sexual Attraction Under Conditions of High Anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1974;30(4):510-517. doi:10.1037/h0037031
15.
Fridlund AJ. Little Albert: A Neurologically Impaired Child. History of Psychology. 2012;15(4):302-327. doi:10.1037/a0026720
16.
Gibbs Jr RW. Introspection and Cognitive Linguistics: Should We Trust Our Own Intuitions? Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics. 2006;4(1):135-151. http://web.a.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail/detail?sid=65ca89c2-e3fd-4aa3-a507-ea6aaec25319%40sessionmgr4006&vid=0&hid=4109&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=23080308&db=ufh
17.
Myers DG. Intuition: Its Powers and Perils. Yale Nota Bene; 2004.
18.
Nisbett RE, Wilson TD. Telling More Than We Can Know: Verbal Reports on Mental Processes. Psychological Review. 1977;84(3):231-259. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.3.231
19.
Libet B. The Timing of Mental Events: Libet’s Experimental Findings and Their Implications. Consciousness and Cognition. 2002;11(2):291-299. doi:10.1006/ccog.2002.0568
20.
Brysbaert M, Rastle K. Historical and Conceptual Issues in Psychology. Pearson Education; 2009. http://ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781405874489
21.
Brysbaert M, Rastle K. Historical and Conceptual Issues in Psychology. 2nd ed. Pearson; 2013.
22.
Sperling G. The Information Available in Brief Visual Presentations. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied. 1960;74(11):1-29. doi:10.1037/h0093759
23.
Miller GA. The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information. Psychological Review. 1956;63(2):81-97. doi:10.1037/h0043158
24.
Dima D. Understanding Why Patients With Schizophrenia Do Not Perceive the Hollow-Mask Illusion Using Dynamic Causal Modelling. NeuroImage. 2009;46(4):1180-1186. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.03.033
25.
Bruce D. Lashley and the Problem of Serial Order. American Psychologist. 1994;49(2):93-103. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.49.2.93
26.
Coltheart M. Cognitive Neuropsychology. In: Stevens’ Handbook of Experimental Psychology, Methodology in Experimental Psychology. Wiley; 2002. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/0471214426.pas0404/abstract
27.
Miller GA. The Cognitive Revolution: A Historical Perspective. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2003;7(3):141-144. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00029-9
28.
Watrin JP, Darwich R. On Behaviorism in the Cognitive Revolution: Myth and Reactions. Review of General Psychology. 2012;16(3):269-282. doi:10.1037/a0026766
29.
Henson R. What Can Functional Neuroimaging Tell the Experimental Psychologist? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A. 2005;58(2):193-233. doi:10.1080/02724980443000502
30.
Page MPA. What Can’t Functional Neuroimaging Tell the Cognitive Psychologist? Cortex. 2006;42(3):428-443. doi:10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70375-7
31.
Mather M. How fMRI Can Inform Cognitive Theories. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2013;8(1):108-113. doi:10.1177/1745691612469037
32.
Wixted JT, Mickes L. On the Relationship Between fMRI and Theories of Cognition: The Arrow Points in Both Directions. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2013;8(1):104-107. doi:10.1177/1745691612469022
33.
Wager TD, Atlas LY. How Is Pain Influenced by Cognition? Neuroimaging Weighs In. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2013;8(1):91-97. doi:10.1177/1745691612469631
34.
Coltheart M. How Can Functional Neuroimaging Inform Cognitive Theories? Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2013;8(1):98-103. doi:10.1177/1745691612469208
35.
Raichle ME. Behind the Scenes of Functional Brain Imaging: A Historical and Physiological Perspective. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1998;95(3):765-772. doi:10.1073/pnas.95.3.765
36.
Poldrack R. Can Cognitive Processes Be Inferred From Neuroimaging Data? Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2006;10(2):59-63. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.12.004
37.
Coltheart M. What Has Functional Neuroimaging Told Us About the Organization of Mind? Cognitive Neuropsychology. 2011;28(6):397-402. doi:10.1080/02643294.2012.666964
38.
Logothetis NK. What We Can Do and What We Cannot Do With fMRI. Nature. 2008;453(7197):869-878. doi:10.1038/nature06976
39.
Henson R. Forward Inference Using Functional Neuroimaging: Dissociations Versus Associations. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2006;10(2):64-69. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.12.005
40.
Farah MJ. Neuroethics: The Ethical, Legal, and Societal Impact of Neuroscience. Annual Review of Psychology. 2012;63(1):571-591. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100438
41.
Farah MJ. Functional MRI-Based Lie Detection: Scientific and Societal Challenges. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2014;15(2):123-131. doi:10.1038/nrn3665
42.
Farah MJ. Neuroethics: The Practical and the Philosophical. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2005;9(1):34-40. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.12.001
43.
Lockwood PL. Association of Callous Traits with Reduced Neural Response to Others’ Pain in Children with Conduct Problems. Current Biology. 2013;23(10):901-905. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2013.04.018
44.
Nishimoto S. Reconstructing Visual Experiences from Brain Activity Evoked by Natural Movies. Current Biology. 2011;21(19):1641-1646. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2011.08.031
45.
Owen AM. Detecting Awareness in the Vegetative State. Science. 2006;313(5792):1402-1402. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3847019
46.
Phelps EA. Performance on Indirect Measures of Race Evaluation Predicts Amygdala Activation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2000;12(5):729-738. doi:10.1162/089892900562552
47.
Brysbaert M, Rastle K. Historical and Conceptual Issues in Psychology. 2nd ed. Pearson; 2013.
48.
Brysbaert M, Rastle K. Historical and Conceptual Issues in Psychology. Pearson Education; 2009. http://ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781405874489
49.
Bennett M. The Motor System in Neuroscience: A History and Analysis of Conceptual Developments. Progress in Neurobiology. 2002;67(1):1-52. doi:10.1016/S0301-0082(02)00012-6
50.
López-Muñoz F. Neuron Theory, the Cornerstone of Neuroscience, on the Centenary of the Nobel Prize Award to Santiago Ramón Y Cajal. Brain Research Bulletin. 2006;70(4-6):391-405. doi:10.1016/j.brainresbull.2006.07.010
51.
Crivellato E, Ribatti D. Soul, Mind, Brain: Greek Philosophy and the Birth of Neuroscience. Brain Research Bulletin. 2007;71(4):327-336. doi:10.1016/j.brainresbull.2006.09.020
52.
Pevsner J. Leonardo Da Vinci’s Contributions to Neuroscience. Trends in Neurosciences. 2002;25(4):217-220. doi:10.1016/S0166-2236(00)02121-4
53.
Bennett MR. The Early History of the Synapse: From Plato to Sherrington. Brain Research Bulletin. 1999;50(2):95-118. doi:10.1016/S0361-9230(99)00094-5
54.
Buss DM. Evolutionary Psychology: A New Paradigm for Psychological Science. Psychological Inquiry. 1995;6(1):1-30. https://www-jstor-org.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/stable/1449568?sid=primo&seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
55.
Cosmides L, Tooby J. Evolutionary Psychology: A Primer. https://www.cep.ucsb.edu/primer.html
56.
Buller DJ. Evolutionary Psychology: The Emperor’s New Paradigm. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2005;9(6):277-283. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.04.003
57.
Buss DM, Schmitt DP. Sexual Strategies Theory: An Evolutionary Perspective on Human Mating. Psychological Review. 1993;100(2):204-232. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.100.2.204
58.
Bolhuis JJ. Darwin in Mind: New Opportunities for Evolutionary Psychology. PLoS Biology. 2011;9(7). doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001109
59.
Brysbaert M, Rastle K. Historical and Conceptual Issues in Psychology. 2nd ed. Pearson; 2013.
60.
Brysbaert M, Rastle K. Historical and Conceptual Issues in Psychology. Pearson Education; 2009. http://ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781405874489
61.
Gould SJ. Morton’s Ranking of Races by Cranial Capacity. Science. 1978;200. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1746562
62.
Ibn-Tamas v. United States :: 1979 :: District of Columbia Court of Appeals Decisions :: District of Columbia Case Law :: District of Columbia Law :: US Law :: Justia. https://law.justia.com/cases/district-of-columbia/court-of-appeals/1979/12614-2.html
63.
Kagan J. Historical Selection. Review of General Psychology. 2009;13(1):77-88. doi:10.1037/a0014228
64.
Lewis JE. The Mismeasure of Science: Stephen Jay Gould versus Samuel George Morton on Skulls and Bias. PLoS Biology. 2011;9(6). doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001071
65.
Schuller RA, Vidmar N. Battered Woman Syndrome Evidence in the Courtroom: A Review of the Literature. Law and Human Behavior. 1992;16(3):273-291. doi:10.1007/BF01044770
66.
Silverman FH. The "Monster” Study. Journal of Fluency Disorders. 1988;13(3):225-231. doi:10.1016/0094-730X(88)90049-6
67.
Weindling P. The Origins of Informed Consent: The International Scientific Commission on Medical War Crimes, and the Nuremburg Code. Bulletin of the History of Medicine. 2001;75(1):37-71. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/4648
68.
Welch BL. Moral Drift and the American Psychological Association: The Road to Torture. Social Justice. 2010;37(2/3 (120-121)):175-182. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41336990?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
69.
Zimbardo PG. Does Psychology Make a Significant Difference in Our Lives? American Psychologist. 2004;59(5):339-351. http://web.a.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail/detail?vid=1&sid=d9aef89d-0f7a-450a-a081-540ce4d31406%40sessionmgr4010&hid=4109&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=2004-16479-003&db=pdh
70.
Brysbaert M, Rastle K. Historical and Conceptual Issues in Psychology. 2nd ed. Pearson; 2013.
71.
Brysbaert M, Rastle K. Historical and Conceptual Issues in Psychology. Pearson Education; 2009. http://ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781405874489
72.
van Strien PJ. Early Applied Psychology Between Essentialism and Pragmatism: The Dynamics of Theory, Tools, and Clients. History of Psychology. 1998;1(3):205-234. http://web.b.ebscohost.com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/ehost/detail/detail?vid=0&sid=68037173-4349-45b7-aa73-ce6df93dab70%40pdc-v-sessmgr03&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=1998-10118-002&db=pdh
73.
Johanningmeier EV, Hale M. Hugo Munsterberg. History of Education Quarterly. 1983;23(2). doi:10.2307/368162
74.
James W. A Plea for Psychology as a ‘Natural Science’. The Philosophical Review. 1892;1(2). doi:10.2307/2175743
75.
Welford AT. Fundamentals of Skill. Methuen; 1968.
76.
Borries C, Launhardt K, Epplen C, Epplen JîT, Winkler P. DNA analyses support the hypothesis that infanticide is adaptive in langur monkeys. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences. 1999;266(1422):901-904. doi:10.1098/rspb.1999.0721
77.
Daly M, Wilson M. The ‘Cinderella effect’ is no fairy tale. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2005;9(11):507-508. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.09.007
78.
Fisher SE. Human Genetics: The Evolving Story of FOXP2. Current Biology. 2019;29(2):R65-R67. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2018.11.047
79.
Laland KN, Odling-Smee J, Myles S. How culture shaped the human genome: bringing genetics and the human sciences together. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2010;11(2):137-148. doi:10.1038/nrg2734
80.
Marcus GF, Fisher SE. FOXP2 in focus: what can genes tell us about speech and language? Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2003;7(6):257-262. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00104-9
81.
Pardiñas AF, Holmans P, Pocklington AJ, et al. Common schizophrenia alleles are enriched in mutation-intolerant genes and in regions under strong background selection. Nature Genetics. 2018;50(3):381-389. doi:10.1038/s41588-018-0059-2
82.
The impact of order incongruence between a task-irrelevant auditory sequence and a task-relevant visual sequence.(Author Abstract). Published online 2005. https://librarysearch.royalholloway.ac.uk/primo-explore/search?query=any,contains,order%20incongruence%20hughes%20jones&tab=tab1&search_scope=LSCOP_44ROY_ALL&sortby=date&vid=44ROY_VU2&facet=frbrgroupid,include,5836150054024640536&lang=en_US&offset=0
