[1]
M. Brysbaert and K. Rastle, Historical and Conceptual Issues in Psychology, 2nd ed. Harlow: Pearson, 2013.
[2]
M. Brysbaert and K. Rastle, Historical and Conceptual Issues in Psychology. Harlow: Pearson Education, 2009 [Online]. Available: http://ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781405874489
[3]
A. F. Chalmers, What Is This Thing Called Science?, 3rd ed. Maidenhead: Open University Press, 1999.
[4]
L. V. Hedges, ‘How Hard Is Hard Science, How Soft Is Soft Science? the Empirical Cumulativeness of Research’, American Psychologist, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 443–455, 1987, doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.42.5.443. [Online]. Available: http://web.a.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail/detail?vid=1&sid=62de742c-ee68-43c4-8cab-4ceb62d395f3%40sessionmgr4010&hid=4109&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=1987-26934-001&db=pdh
[5]
S. O. Lilienfeld, ‘Public Skepticism of Psychology: Why Many People Perceive the Study of Human Behavior as Unscientific’, American Psychologist, vol. 67, no. 2, 2012 [Online]. Available: http://web.a.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail/detail?vid=1&sid=6d759316-824d-4168-a238-5faa05c315a0%40sessionmgr4010&hid=4109&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=2011-12007-001&db=pdh
[6]
N. Kumar, ‘Karl Popper, Psychology and Philosophy’, Psychological Studies, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 270–274, 2010, doi: 10.1007/s12646-010-0032-3.
[7]
D. P. Rowbottom, ‘Kuhn vs. Popper on criticism and dogmatism in science: a resolution at the group level’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 117–124, Mar. 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2010.11.031.
[8]
S. Fuller, ‘Kuhn vs. Popper: The Struggle for the Soul of Science’. 2003 [Online]. Available: http://www.collier.sts.vt.edu/5306/kuhnpopper.pdf
[9]
M. Brysbaert and K. Rastle, Historical and Conceptual Issues in Psychology, 2nd ed. Harlow: Pearson, 2013.
[10]
M. Brysbaert and K. Rastle, Historical and Conceptual Issues in Psychology. Harlow: Pearson Education, 2009 [Online]. Available: http://ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781405874489
[11]
S. Carpenter, ‘Some Neglected Contributions of Wilhelm Wundt to the Psychology of Memory’. 2005 [Online]. Available: http://public.psych.iastate.edu/shacarp/carpenter_2005.pdf
[12]
E. C. Tolman, ‘Cognitive Maps in Rats and Men.’, Psychological Review, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 189–208, 1948, doi: 10.1037/h0061626.
[13]
K. Danziger, ‘The History of Introspection Reconsidered [open access]’, Journal of the History of Behaviour Sciences, vol. 16, no. 3, 1980 [Online]. Available: http://www.kurtdanziger.com/hist%20introsp.pdf
[14]
D. G. Dutton and A. P. Aron, ‘Some Evidence for Heightened Sexual Attraction Under Conditions of High Anxiety’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 510–517, 1974, doi: 10.1037/h0037031. [Online]. Available: http://web.a.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail/detail?sid=2fa2ff6e-e843-4b21-afa9-b96a764a6a98%40sessionmgr4009&vid=0&hid=4109&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=1975-03016-001&db=pdh
[15]
A. J. Fridlund, ‘Little Albert: A Neurologically Impaired Child’, History of Psychology, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 302–327, 2012, doi: 10.1037/a0026720. [Online]. Available: http://web.b.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail/detail?vid=0&sid=2be64dcc-42fd-4ea1-9b05-01e8f0d4b947%40sessionmgr2&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=2012-01974-001&db=pdh
[16]
R. W. Gibbs Jr, ‘Introspection and Cognitive Linguistics: Should We Trust Our Own Intuitions?’, Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 135–151, 2006 [Online]. Available: http://web.a.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail/detail?sid=65ca89c2-e3fd-4aa3-a507-ea6aaec25319%40sessionmgr4006&vid=0&hid=4109&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=23080308&db=ufh
[17]
D. G. Myers, Intuition: Its Powers and Perils. New Haven, [Conn.]: Yale Nota Bene, 2004.
[18]
R. E. Nisbett and T. D. Wilson, ‘Telling More Than We Can Know: Verbal Reports on Mental Processes’, Psychological Review, vol. 84, no. 3, pp. 231–259, 1977, doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.84.3.231. [Online]. Available: http://web.a.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail/detail?sid=5b1f7f84-58a6-472e-bb3e-e2470d004ca5%40sessionmgr4006&vid=0&hid=4109&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=1978-00295-001&db=pdh
[19]
B. Libet, ‘The Timing of Mental Events: Libet’s Experimental Findings and Their Implications’, Consciousness and Cognition, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 291–299, 2002, doi: 10.1006/ccog.2002.0568.
[20]
M. Brysbaert and K. Rastle, Historical and Conceptual Issues in Psychology. Harlow: Pearson Education, 2009 [Online]. Available: http://ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781405874489
[21]
M. Brysbaert and K. Rastle, Historical and Conceptual Issues in Psychology, 2nd ed. Harlow: Pearson, 2013.
[22]
G. Sperling, ‘The Information Available in Brief Visual Presentations’, Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, vol. 74, no. 11, pp. 1–29, 1960, doi: 10.1037/h0093759. [Online]. Available: http://web.b.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail/detail?vid=0&sid=9a143d7a-3fd6-4892-8cf5-1bc9d5d75a49%40sessionmgr1&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=2011-17733-001&db=pdh
[23]
G. A. Miller, ‘The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information’, Psychological Review, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 81–97, 1956, doi: 10.1037/h0043158. [Online]. Available: http://web.b.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail/detail?vid=0&sid=03e98fdc-3a19-4030-a2e2-7eb80acfec50%40sessionmgr2&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=1994-28291-001&db=pdh
[24]
D. Dima, ‘Understanding Why Patients With Schizophrenia Do Not Perceive the Hollow-Mask Illusion Using Dynamic Causal Modelling’, NeuroImage, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 1180–1186, 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.03.033.
[25]
D. Bruce, ‘Lashley and the Problem of Serial Order’, American Psychologist, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 93–103, 1994, doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.49.2.93. [Online]. Available: http://web.a.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail/detail?vid=1&sid=8fa17901-b5ee-4ab4-8bbc-38ec67aa3994%40sessionmgr4009&hid=4109&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=1994-24098-001&db=pdh
[26]
M. Coltheart, ‘Cognitive Neuropsychology’, in Stevens’ Handbook of Experimental Psychology, Methodology in Experimental Psychology, Wiley, 2002 [Online]. Available: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/0471214426.pas0404/abstract
[27]
G. A. Miller, ‘The Cognitive Revolution: A Historical Perspective’, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 141–144, 2003, doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00029-9.
[28]
J. P. Watrin and R. Darwich, ‘On Behaviorism in the Cognitive Revolution: Myth and Reactions’, Review of General Psychology, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 269–282, 2012, doi: 10.1037/a0026766. [Online]. Available: http://web.a.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail/detail?sid=6cf06b39-b22d-41ea-876f-e5d863af6cbb%40sessionmgr4006&vid=0&hid=4109&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=2012-23422-001&db=pdh
[29]
R. Henson, ‘What Can Functional Neuroimaging Tell the Experimental Psychologist?’, The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 193–233, 2005, doi: 10.1080/02724980443000502.
[30]
M. P. A. Page, ‘What Can’t Functional Neuroimaging Tell the Cognitive Psychologist?’, Cortex, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 428–443, Jan. 2006, doi: 10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70375-7.
[31]
M. Mather, ‘How fMRI Can Inform Cognitive Theories’, Perspectives on Psychological Science, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 108–113, 2013, doi: 10.1177/1745691612469037.
[32]
J. T. Wixted and L. Mickes, ‘On the Relationship Between fMRI and Theories of Cognition: The Arrow Points in Both Directions’, Perspectives on Psychological Science, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 104–107, 2013, doi: 10.1177/1745691612469022.
[33]
T. D. Wager and L. Y. Atlas, ‘How Is Pain Influenced by Cognition? Neuroimaging Weighs In’, Perspectives on Psychological Science, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 91–97, 2013, doi: 10.1177/1745691612469631.
[34]
M. Coltheart, ‘How Can Functional Neuroimaging Inform Cognitive Theories?’, Perspectives on Psychological Science, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 98–103, 2013, doi: 10.1177/1745691612469208.
[35]
M. E. Raichle, ‘Behind the Scenes of Functional Brain Imaging: A Historical and Physiological Perspective’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 95, no. 3, pp. 765–772, 1998, doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.3.765.
[36]
R. Poldrack, ‘Can Cognitive Processes Be Inferred From Neuroimaging Data?’, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 59–63, 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.12.004.
[37]
M. Coltheart, ‘What Has Functional Neuroimaging Told Us About the Organization of Mind?’, Cognitive Neuropsychology, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 397–402, 2011, doi: 10.1080/02643294.2012.666964.
[38]
N. K. Logothetis, ‘What We Can Do and What We Cannot Do With fMRI’, Nature, vol. 453, no. 7197, pp. 869–878, 2008, doi: 10.1038/nature06976.
[39]
R. Henson, ‘Forward Inference Using Functional Neuroimaging: Dissociations Versus Associations’, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 64–69, 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.12.005.
[40]
M. J. Farah, ‘Neuroethics: The Ethical, Legal, and Societal Impact of Neuroscience’, Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 571–591, 2012, doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100438.
[41]
M. J. Farah, ‘Functional MRI-Based Lie Detection: Scientific and Societal Challenges’, Nature Reviews Neuroscience, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 123–131, 2014, doi: 10.1038/nrn3665.
[42]
M. J. Farah, ‘Neuroethics: The Practical and the Philosophical’, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 34–40, 2005, doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.12.001.
[43]
P. L. Lockwood, ‘Association of Callous Traits with Reduced Neural Response to Others’ Pain in Children with Conduct Problems’, Current Biology, vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 901–905, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.04.018.
[44]
S. Nishimoto, ‘Reconstructing Visual Experiences from Brain Activity Evoked by Natural Movies’, Current Biology, vol. 21, no. 19, pp. 1641–1646, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.08.031.
[45]
A. M. Owen, ‘Detecting Awareness in the Vegetative State’, Science, vol. 313, no. 5792, pp. 1402–1402, 2006 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3847019
[46]
E. A. Phelps, ‘Performance on Indirect Measures of Race Evaluation Predicts Amygdala Activation’, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 729–738, 2000, doi: 10.1162/089892900562552.
[47]
M. Brysbaert and K. Rastle, Historical and Conceptual Issues in Psychology, 2nd ed. Harlow: Pearson, 2013.
[48]
M. Brysbaert and K. Rastle, Historical and Conceptual Issues in Psychology. Harlow: Pearson Education, 2009 [Online]. Available: http://ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781405874489
[49]
M. Bennett, ‘The Motor System in Neuroscience: A History and Analysis of Conceptual Developments’, Progress in Neurobiology, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 1–52, 2002, doi: 10.1016/S0301-0082(02)00012-6.
[50]
F. López-Muñoz, ‘Neuron Theory, the Cornerstone of Neuroscience, on the Centenary of the Nobel Prize Award to Santiago Ramón Y Cajal’, Brain Research Bulletin, vol. 70, no. 4–6, pp. 391–405, 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2006.07.010.
[51]
E. Crivellato and D. Ribatti, ‘Soul, Mind, Brain: Greek Philosophy and the Birth of Neuroscience’, Brain Research Bulletin, vol. 71, no. 4, pp. 327–336, 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2006.09.020.
[52]
J. Pevsner, ‘Leonardo Da Vinci’s Contributions to Neuroscience’, Trends in Neurosciences, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 217–220, 2002, doi: 10.1016/S0166-2236(00)02121-4.
[53]
M. R. Bennett, ‘The Early History of the Synapse: From Plato to Sherrington’, Brain Research Bulletin, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 95–118, 1999, doi: 10.1016/S0361-9230(99)00094-5.
[54]
D. M. Buss, ‘Evolutionary Psychology: A New Paradigm for Psychological Science’, Psychological Inquiry, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–30, 1995 [Online]. Available: https://www-jstor-org.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/stable/1449568?sid=primo&seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
[55]
L. Cosmides and J. Tooby, Evolutionary Psychology: A Primer. [Online]. Available: https://www.cep.ucsb.edu/primer.html
[56]
D. J. Buller, ‘Evolutionary Psychology: The Emperor’s New Paradigm’, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 277–283, 2005, doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.04.003.
[57]
D. M. Buss and D. P. Schmitt, ‘Sexual Strategies Theory: An Evolutionary Perspective on Human Mating.’, Psychological Review, vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 204–232, 1993, doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.100.2.204.
[58]
J. J. Bolhuis, ‘Darwin in Mind: New Opportunities for Evolutionary Psychology’, PLoS Biology, vol. 9, no. 7, 2011, doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001109.
[59]
M. Brysbaert and K. Rastle, Historical and Conceptual Issues in Psychology, 2nd ed. Harlow: Pearson, 2013.
[60]
M. Brysbaert and K. Rastle, Historical and Conceptual Issues in Psychology. Harlow: Pearson Education, 2009 [Online]. Available: http://ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781405874489
[61]
S. J. Gould, ‘Morton’s Ranking of Races by Cranial Capacity’, Science, vol. 200, 1978 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1746562
[62]
‘Ibn-Tamas v. United States :: 1979 :: District of Columbia Court of Appeals Decisions :: District of Columbia Case Law :: District of Columbia Law :: US Law :: Justia’. [Online]. Available: https://law.justia.com/cases/district-of-columbia/court-of-appeals/1979/12614-2.html
[63]
J. Kagan, ‘Historical Selection’, Review of General Psychology, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 77–88, 2009, doi: 10.1037/a0014228. [Online]. Available: http://web.a.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail/detail?sid=84b14040-2c05-4f4d-9993-81b72bc3a590%40sessionmgr4009&vid=0&hid=4109&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=2009-02787-008&db=pdh
[64]
J. E. Lewis, ‘The Mismeasure of Science: Stephen Jay Gould versus Samuel George Morton on Skulls and Bias’, PLoS Biology, vol. 9, no. 6, 2011, doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001071.
[65]
R. A. Schuller and N. Vidmar, ‘Battered Woman Syndrome Evidence in the Courtroom: A Review of the Literature’, Law and Human Behavior, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 273–291, 1992, doi: 10.1007/BF01044770. [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1394072
[66]
F. H. Silverman, ‘The "Monster” Study’, Journal of Fluency Disorders, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 225–231, 1988, doi: 10.1016/0094-730X(88)90049-6.
[67]
P. Weindling, ‘The Origins of Informed Consent: The International Scientific Commission on Medical War Crimes, and the Nuremburg Code’, Bulletin of the History of Medicine, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 37–71, 2001 [Online]. Available: https://muse.jhu.edu/article/4648
[68]
B. L. Welch, ‘Moral Drift and the American Psychological Association: The Road to Torture’, Social Justice, vol. 37, no. 2/3 (120-121), pp. 175–182, 2010 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41336990?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[69]
P. G. Zimbardo, ‘Does Psychology Make a Significant Difference in Our Lives?’, American Psychologist, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 339–351, 2004 [Online]. Available: http://web.a.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail/detail?vid=1&sid=d9aef89d-0f7a-450a-a081-540ce4d31406%40sessionmgr4010&hid=4109&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=2004-16479-003&db=pdh
[70]
M. Brysbaert and K. Rastle, Historical and Conceptual Issues in Psychology, 2nd ed. Harlow: Pearson, 2013.
[71]
M. Brysbaert and K. Rastle, Historical and Conceptual Issues in Psychology. Harlow: Pearson Education, 2009 [Online]. Available: http://ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781405874489
[72]
P. J. van Strien, ‘Early Applied Psychology Between Essentialism and Pragmatism: The Dynamics of Theory, Tools, and Clients’, History of Psychology, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 205–234, 1998 [Online]. Available: http://web.b.ebscohost.com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/ehost/detail/detail?vid=0&sid=68037173-4349-45b7-aa73-ce6df93dab70%40pdc-v-sessmgr03&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=1998-10118-002&db=pdh
[73]
E. V. Johanningmeier and M. Hale, ‘Hugo Munsterberg’, History of Education Quarterly, vol. 23, no. 2, 1983, doi: 10.2307/368162.
[74]
W. James, ‘A Plea for Psychology as a “Natural Science”’, The Philosophical Review, vol. 1, no. 2, 1892, doi: 10.2307/2175743.
[75]
A. T. Welford, Fundamentals of skill. London: Methuen, 1968.
[76]
C. Borries, K. Launhardt, C. Epplen, Jî. T. Epplen, and P. Winkler, ‘DNA analyses support the hypothesis that infanticide is adaptive in langur monkeys’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, vol. 266, no. 1422, pp. 901–904, May 1999, doi: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0721.
[77]
M. Daly and M. Wilson, ‘The “Cinderella effect” is no fairy tale’, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 507–508, Nov. 2005, doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.09.007.
[78]
S. E. Fisher, ‘Human Genetics: The Evolving Story of FOXP2’, Current Biology, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. R65–R67, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.11.047.
[79]
K. N. Laland, J. Odling-Smee, and S. Myles, ‘How culture shaped the human genome: bringing genetics and the human sciences together’, Nature Reviews Genetics, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 137–148, Feb. 2010, doi: 10.1038/nrg2734.
[80]
G. F. Marcus and S. E. Fisher, ‘FOXP2 in focus: what can genes tell us about speech and language?’, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 257–262, Jun. 2003, doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00104-9.
[81]
A. F. Pardiñas et al., ‘Common schizophrenia alleles are enriched in mutation-intolerant genes and in regions under strong background selection’, Nature Genetics, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 381–389, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0059-2.
[82]
‘The impact of order incongruence between a task-irrelevant auditory sequence and a task-relevant visual sequence.(Author Abstract)’, 2005 [Online]. Available: https://librarysearch.royalholloway.ac.uk/primo-explore/search?query=any,contains,order%20incongruence%20hughes%20jones&tab=tab1&search_scope=LSCOP_44ROY_ALL&sortby=date&vid=44ROY_VU2&facet=frbrgroupid,include,5836150054024640536&lang=en_US&offset=0
