1.
Oostenbroek, J.: Comprehensive Longitudinal Study Challenges the Existence of Neonatal Imitation in Humans. Current Biology. 26, 1334–1338 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2016.03.047.
2.
Liszkowski, U.: Twelve-Month-Olds Point to Share Attention and Interest. Developmental Science. 7, 297–307 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2004.00349.x.
3.
Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M.: Shared Intentionality. Developmental Science. 10, 121–125 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00573.x.
4.
Warneken, F., Tomasello, M.: Helping and Cooperation at 14 Months of Age. Infancy. 11, 271–294 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7078.2007.tb00227.x.
5.
Hepach, R.: A New Look at Children’s Prosocial Motivation. Infancy. 18, 67–90 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7078.2012.00130.x.
6.
Carpenter, M.: Twelve- and 18-Month-Olds Copy Actions in Terms of Goals. Developmental Science. 8, F13–F20 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2004.00385.x.
7.
Moll, H., Tomasello, M.: 12- and 18-Month-Old Infants Follow Gaze to Spaces Behind Barriers. Developmental Science. 7, 1–9 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2004.00315.x.
8.
Tomasello, M.: A New Look at Infant Pointing. Child Development. 78, 705–722 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01025.x.
9.
Meltzoff, A.N.: ‘Like Me’: A Foundation for Social Cognition. Developmental Science. 10, 126–134 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00574.x.
10.
Mitchell, P.: Acquiring a Theory of Mind. In: An Introduction to Developmental Psychology. pp. 357–384. BPS Blackwell, Chichester (2011).
11.
Baron-Cohen, S.: Does the Autistic Child Have a "Theory of Mind”? Cognition. 21, 37–46 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(85)90022-8.
12.
Wellman, H.M.: Meta-Analysis of Theory-of-Mind Development: The Truth About False Belief. Child Development. 72, 655–684 (2001).
13.
Yamaguchi, M., Kuhlmeier, V.A., Wynn, K., vanMarle, K.: Continuity in Social Cognition From Infancy to Childhood. Developmental Science. 12, 746–752 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00813.x.
14.
Yazdi, A.A., German, T.P., Defeyter, M.A., Siegal, M.: Competence and Performance in Belief-Desire Reasoning Across Two Cultures: The Truth, the Whole Truth and Nothing but the Truth About False Belief? Cognition. 100, 343–368 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2005.05.004.
15.
Banerjee, R., Watling, D., Caputi, M.: Peer Relations and the Understanding of Faux Pas: Longitudinal Evidence for Bidirectional Associations. Child Development. 82, 1887–1905 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01669.x.
16.
Callaghan, T.: Synchrony in the Onset of Mental-State Reasoning: Evidence From Five Cultures. Psychological Science. 16, 378–384 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01544.x.
17.
Ensor, R., Hughes, C.: Content or Connectedness? Mother–Child Talk and Early Social Understanding. Child Development. 79, 201–216 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01120.x.
18.
Peterson, C.C., Wellman, H.M., Liu, D.: Steps in Theory-of-Mind Development for Children With Deafness or Autism. Child Development. 76, 502–517 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00859.x.
19.
Ruffman, T.: Older (But Not Younger) Siblings Facilitate False Belief Understanding. Developmental Psychology. 34, 161–174 (1998).
20.
Thoermer, C., Sodian, B., Vuori, M., Perst, H., Kristen, S.: Continuity From an Implicit to an Explicit Understanding of False Belief From Infancy to Preschool Age. British Journal of Developmental Psychology. 30, 172–187 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-835X.2011.02067.x.
21.
Durkin, K.: Social Cognition I: Understanding the Social World. In: Developmental Social Psychology: From Infancy to Old Age. pp. 287–301. Blackwell, Cambridge, Mass (1995).
22.
Kroger, J., Martinussen, M., Marcia, J.E.: Identity Status Change During Adolescence and Young Adulthood: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Adolescence. 33, 683–698 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2009.11.002.
23.
Ross, J., Yilmaz, M., Dale, R., Cassidy, R., Yildirim, I., Zeedyk, S.: Cultural Differences in Self-Recognition: The Early Development of Autonomous and Related Selves? Developmental Science. 20, (2017). https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12387.
24.
Robins, R.W., Trzesniewski, K.H.: Self-Esteem Development Across the Lifespan. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 14, 158–162 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00353.x.
25.
Moore, C.: The Development of Body Self-Awareness. Infancy. 11, 157–174 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7078.2007.tb00220.x.
26.
Mann, M.: Self-Esteem in a Broad-Spectrum Approach for Mental Health Promotion. Health Education Research. 19, 357–372 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyg041.
27.
Phinney, J.S.: Ethnic Identity in Adolescents and Adults: Review of Research. Psychological Bulletin. 108, 499–514 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.499.
28.
Rothbart, M.K.: Temperament and Personality: Origins and Outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 78, 122–135 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.1.122.
29.
Clay, D., Vignoles, V.L., Dittmar, H.: Body Image and Self-Esteem Among Adolescent Girls: Testing the Influence of Sociocultural Factors. Journal of Research on Adolescence. 15, 451–477 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2005.00107.x.
30.
Keller, H.: Parenting Styles and the Development of the Categorical Self: A Longitudinal Study on Mirror Self-Recognition in Cameroonian Nso and German Families. International Journal of Behavioral Development. 29, 496–504 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1177/01650250500147485.
31.
Denham, S.: Emotional and Social Development in Childhood. In: Smith, P.K. and Hart, C.H. (eds.) The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of Childhood Social Development. pp. 413–433. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester (2014).
32.
Leman, P.: Emotional Development and Attachment. In: Developmental Psychology. pp. 157–195. McGraw-Hill, Maidenhead (2012).
33.
Bruce, V., Campbell, R.N., Doherty-Sneddon, G., Langton, S., McAuley, S., Wright, R.: Testing Face Processing Skills in Children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology. 18, 319–333 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1348/026151000165715.
34.
Gao, X., Maurer, D.: A Happy Story: Developmental Changes in Children’s Sensitivity to Facial Expressions of Varying Intensities. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 107, 67–86 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2010.05.003.
35.
Herba, C.M.: The Development of Emotion-Processing in Children: Effects of Age, Emotion, and Intensity. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 47, 1098–1106 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2006.01652.x.
36.
Herba, C., Phillips, M.: Annotation: Development of Facial Expression Recognition From Childhood to Adolescence: Behavioural and Neurological Perspectives. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 45, 1185–1198 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00316.x.
37.
Marsh, A.A., Ambady, N.: The Influence of the Fear Facial Expression on Prosocial Responding. Cognition & Emotion. 21, 225–247 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930600652234.
38.
Watling, D., Workman, L., Bourne, V.J.: Emotion Lateralisation: Developments Throughout the Lifespan. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition. 17, 389–411 (2012).
39.
Workman, L., Chilvers, L., Yeomans, H., Taylor, S.: Development of Cerebral Lateralisation for Recognition of Emotions in Chimeric Faces in Children Aged 5 to 11. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition. 11, 493–507 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1080/13576500600724963.
40.
Goswami, U., Bryant, P.: Children’s Cognitive Development and Learning, https://www.cne.psychol.cam.ac.uk/pdfs/publication-pdfs/Primary_Review_2-1a_report_CogDevLearn_Goswami-Bryant_2007.pdf, (2007).
41.
Liddard, A., Pinkham, A.M., Smith, E.: Pretend Play and Cognitive Development. In: The Wiley-Blackwell Handbook of Childhood Cognitive Development. Wiley-Blackwell, Malden, MA (2011).
42.
Lillard, A., Pinkham, A.M., Smith, E.: Pretend Play and Cognitive Development. In: The Wiley-Blackwell Handbook of Childhood Cognitive Development (2011).
43.
Gelman, S.A., Meyer, M.: Child Categorization. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science. 2, 95–105 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.96.
44.
Westermann, G., Mareschal, D., Johnson, M.H., Sirois, S., Spratling, M.W., Thomas, M.S.C.: Neuroconstructivism. Developmental Science. 10, 75–83 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00567.x.
45.
Mejía-Arauz, R., Rogoff, B., Paradise, R.: Cultural Variation in Children’s Observation During a Demonstration. International Journal of Behavioral Development. 29, 282–291 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1177/01650250544000062.
46.
Aslin, R., Fiser, J.: Methodological Challenges for Understanding Cognitive Development in Infants. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 9, 92–98 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.01.003.
47.
Bergen, D.: The Role of Pretend Play in Children’s Cognitive Development. Early Childhood Research & Practice. 4, (2002).
48.
Ma, L., Lillard, A.S.: What Makes an Act a Pretense One? Young Children’s Pretend-Real Judgments and Explanations. Child Development Research. 2013, 1–9 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/467872.
49.
Althaus, N., Westermann, G.: Labels Constructively Shape Object Categories in 10-Month-Old Infants. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 151, 5–17 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2015.11.013.
50.
Diesendruck, G., Bloom, P.: How Specific is the Shape Bias? Child Development. 74, 168–178 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00528.
51.
Ware, E.A.: Individual and Developmental Differences in Preschoolers’ Categorization Biases and Vocabulary Across Tasks. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 153, 35–56 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2016.08.009.
52.
Waxman, S.R., Namy, L.L.: Challenging the Notion of a Thematic Preference in Young Children. Developmental Psychology. 33, 555–567 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.33.3.555.
53.
Quinn, P.C., Eimas, P.D.: Perceptual Cues That Permit Categorical Differentiation of Animal Species by Infants. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 63, 189–211 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1006/jecp.1996.0047.
55.
Vasilyeva, M., Lourenco, S.F.: Development of Spatial Cognition. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science. 3, 349–362 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1171.
56.
Newcombe, N.S.: The Nativist-Empiricist Controversy in the Context of Recent Research on Spatial and Quantitative Development. Psychological Science. 13, 395–401 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00471.
57.
Mathematical cognition.
58.
Berteletti, I., Lucangeli, D., Piazza, M., Dehaene, S., Zorzi, M.: Numerical Estimation in Preschoolers. Developmental Psychology. 46, 545–551 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017887.
59.
Feigenson, L., Carey, S., Hauser, M.: The Representations Underlying Infants’ Choice of More: Object Files Versus Analog Magnitudes. Psychological Science. 13, 150–156 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00427.
60.
Broadbent, H.J., Farran, E.K., Tolmie, A.: Egocentric and Allocentric Navigation Strategies in Williams Syndrome and Typical Development. Developmental Science. 17, 920–934 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12176.
61.
Bullens, J., Iglói, K., Berthoz, A., Postma, A., Rondi-Reig, L.: Developmental Time Course of the Acquisition of Sequential Egocentric and Allocentric Navigation Strategies. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 107, 337–350 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2010.05.010.
62.
Bushnell, E.W., McKenzie, B.E., Lawrence, D.A., Connell, S.: The Spatial Coding Strategies of One-Year-Old Infants in a Locomotor Search Task. Child Development. 66, (1995). https://doi.org/10.2307/1131790.
63.
Learmonth, A.E., Newcombe, N.S., Huttenlocher, J.: Toddlers’ Use of Metric Information and Landmarks to Reorient. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 80, 225–244 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1006/jecp.2001.2635.
64.
Hermer, L., Spelke, E.S.: A Geometric Process for Spatial Reorientation in Young Children. Nature. 370, 57–59 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1038/370057a0.
65.
Learmonth, A.E., Nadel, L., Newcombe, N.S.: Children’s Use of Landmarks: Implications for Modularity Theory. Psychological Science. 13, 337–341 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2002.00461.x.
66.
Nardini, M., Burgess, N., Breckenridge, K., Atkinson, J.: Differential Developmental Trajectories for Egocentric, Environmental and Intrinsic Frames of Reference in Spatial Memory. Cognition. 101, 153–172 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2005.09.005.
67.
Newcombe, N.S., Levine, S.C., Mix, K.S.: Thinking About Quantity: The Intertwined Development of Spatial and Numerical Cognition. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science. 6, 491–505 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1369.
68.
Pruden, S.M., Levine, S.C., Huttenlocher, J.: Children’s Spatial Thinking: Does Talk About the Spatial World Matter? Developmental Science. 14, 1417–1430 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01088.x.
69.
Sluzenski, J., Newcombe, N.S., Satlow, E.: Knowing Where Things Are in the Second Year of Life: Implications for Hippocampal Development. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 16, 1443–1451 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1162/0898929042304804.
70.
Antell, S.E., Keating, D.P.: Perception of Numerical Invariance in Neonates. Child Development. 54, (1983). https://doi.org/10.2307/1130057.
71.
Barth, H., La Mont, K., Lipton, J., Spelke, E.S.: Abstract Number and Arithmetic in Preschool Children. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 102, 14116–14121 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0505512102.
72.
Bermejo, V., Morales, S., deOsuna, J.G.: Supporting Children’s Development of Cardinality Understanding. Learning and Instruction. 14, 381–398 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2004.06.010.
73.
Cantlon, J.F., Brannon, E.M., Carter, E.J., Pelphrey, K.A.: Functional Imaging of Numerical Processing in Adults and 4-y-Old Children. PLoS Biology. 4, (2006). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0040125.
74.
Chen, C., Stevenson, H.W.: Motivation and Mathematics Achievement: A Comparative Study of Asian-American, Caucasian-American, and East Asian High School Students. Child Development. 66, (1995). https://doi.org/10.2307/1131808.
75.
Cohen, L.B., Marks, K.S.: How Infants Process Addition and Subtraction Events. Developmental Science. 5, 186–201 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7687.00220.
76.
Hyde, D.C., Boas, D.A., Blair, C., Carey, S.: Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Shows Right Parietal Specialization for Number in Pre-Verbal Infants. NeuroImage. 53, 647–652 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.06.030.
77.
Miller, K.F., Stigler, J.W.: Counting in Chinese: Cultural Variation in a Basic Cognitive Skill. Cognitive Development. 2, 279–305 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2014(87)90091-8.
78.
Wynn, K.: Addition and Subtraction by Human Infants. Nature. 358, 749–750 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1038/358749a0.
79.
Castles, A., Rastle, K., Nation, K.: Ending the Reading Wars: Reading Acquisition From Novice to Expert. Psychological Science in the Public Interest. 19, 5–51 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100618772271.
80.
Cain, K.: Reading Development and Difficulties. BPS Blackwell/John Wiley, Chichester, West Sussex, U.K. (2010).
81.
Hulme, C., Snowling, M.J.: Reading Disorders I: Developmental Dyslexia. In: Developmental Disorders of Language Learning and Cognition. pp. 37–89. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford (2009).
82.
Hulme, C., Snowling, M.J.: Reading Disorders II: Reading Comprehension Impairment. In: Developmental Disorders of Language Learning and Cognition. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford (2009).
83.
Clarke, P.J.: Ameliorating Children’s Reading-Comprehension Difficulties: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Psychological Science. 21, 1106–1116 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610375449.
84.
Duff, F.J., Clarke, P.J.: Practitioner Review: Reading Disorders: What Are the Effective Interventions and How Should They Be Implemented and Evaluated? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 52, 3–12 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02310.x.
85.
Muter, V., Hulme, C., Snowling, M.J., Stevenson, J.: Phonemes, Rimes, Vocabulary, and Grammatical Skills as Foundations of Early Reading Development: Evidence From a Longitudinal Study. Developmental Psychology. 40, 665–681 (2004).
86.
Kirby, J.R., Savage, R.S.: Can the Simple View Deal With the Complexities of Reading? Literacy. 42, 75–82 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-4369.2008.00487.x.
87.
Nation, K.: Working Memory Deficits in Poor Comprehenders Reflect Underlying Language Impairments. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 73, 139–158 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1006/jecp.1999.2498.
88.
Nation, K., Hulme, C.: Learning to Read Changes Children’s Phonological Skills: Evidence From a Latent Variable Longitudinal Study of Reading and Nonword Repetition. Developmental Science. 14, 649–659 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.01008.x.
89.
Nation, K.: A Longitudinal Investigation of Early Reading and Language Skills in Children With Poor Reading Comprehension. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 51, 1031–1039 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02254.x.
90.
Powell, D.: Does the PMSP Connectionist Model of Single Word Reading Learn to Read in the Same Way as a Child? Journal of Research in Reading. 29, 229–250 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2006.00300.x.
91.
Ricketts, J.: Research Review: Reading Comprehension in Developmental Disorders of Language and Communication. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 52, 1111–1123 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02438.x.
92.
Stuart, M.: Literacy as a Complex Activity: Deconstructing the Simple View of Reading. Literacy. 42, 59–66 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-4369.2008.00490.x.
93.
Tunmer, W.E., Chapman, J.W.: The Simple View of Reading Redux: Vocabulary Knowledge and the Independent Components Hypothesis. Journal of Learning Disabilities. 45, 453–466 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219411432685.
94.
Adams, M.J.: Beginning to Read: Thinking and Learning About Print. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass (1990).
95.
Cain, K.: Investigating the Causes of Reading Comprehension Failure: The Comprehension-Age Match Designl. Reading and Writing. 12, 31–40 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008058319399.
96.
Marshall, C.: Rapid Auditory Processing and Phonological Ability in Normal Readers and Readers With Dyslexia. Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research. 44, 925–940 (2001).
97.
McHale, S.M.: The Family Contexts of Gender Development in Childhood and Adolescence. Social Development. 12, 125–148 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9507.00225.
98.
Joel, D.: Sex Beyond the Genitalia: The Human Brain Mosaic. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 112, 15468–15473 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1509654112.
99.
Ruble, D.N.: Gender Constancy and the Effects of Sex-Typed Televised Toy Commercials. Child Development. 52, 667–673 (1981). https://doi.org/10.2307/1129188.
100.
Martin, C.L., Ruble, D.: Children’s Search for Gender Cues. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 13, 67–70 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00276.x.
101.
Shutts, K.: Social Categories Guide Young Children’s Preferences for Novel Objects. Developmental Science. 13, 599–610 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00913.x.
102.
Hyde, J.S.: Gender Similarities and Differences. Annual Review of Psychology. 65, 373–398 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115057.
103.
Ingalhalikar, M.: Sex Differences in the Structural Connectome of the Human Brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 111, 823–828 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1316909110.
104.
Joel, D., Tarrasch, R.: On the Mis-Presentation and Misinterpretation of Gender-Related Data: The Case of Ingalhalikar’s Human Connectome Study. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 111, E637–E637 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1323319111.
105.
Maccoby, E.E.: Perspectives on Gender Development. International Journal of Behavioral Development. 24, 398–406 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1080/016502500750037946.
106.
Muzzatti, B.: Gender and Mathematics: Attitudes and Stereotype Threat Susceptibility in Italian Children. Developmental Psychology. 43, 747–759 (2007).
107.
Blakemore, S.-J., Mills, K.L.: Is Adolescence a Sensitive Period for Sociocultural Processing? Annual Review of Psychology. 65, 187–207 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115202.
108.
Steinberg, L.: Cognitive and Affective Development in Adolescence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 9, 69–74 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.12.005.
109.
Steinberg, L.: A Social Neuroscience Perspective on Adolescent Risk-Taking. Developmental Review. 28, 78–106 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2007.08.002.
110.
Gardner, M.: Peer Influence on Risk Taking, Risk Preference, and Risky Decision Making in Adolescence and Adulthood: An Experimental Study. Developmental Psychology. 41, 625–635 (2005).
111.
Choudhury, S.: Social Cognitive Development During Adolescence. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience. 1, 165–174 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsl024.
112.
Luna, B.: Maturation of Cognitive Processes From Late Childhood to Adulthood. Child Development. 75, 1357–1372 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00745.x.
113.
Mendle, J.: Detrimental Psychological Outcomes Associated With Early Pubertal Timing in Adolescent Girls. Developmental Review. 27, 151–171 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2006.11.001.
114.
Somerville, L.H.: The Teenage Brain: Sensitivity to Social Evaluation. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 22, 121–127 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721413476512.
115.
Hooper, C.J.: Adolescents’ Performance on the Iowa Gambling Task: Implications for the Development of Decision Making and Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex. Developmental Psychology. 40, 1148–1158 (2004).
116.
Hare, B., Tomasello, M.: Chimpanzees Are More Skilful in Competitive Than in Cooperative Cognitive Tasks. Animal Behaviour. 68, 571–581 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.11.011.
117.
Hopper, L.M., Lambeth, S.P., Schapiro, S.J., Whiten, A.: Observational Learning in Chimpanzees and Children Studied Through ‘Ghost’ Conditions. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 275, 835–840 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2007.1542.
118.
Kersken, V., Gómez, J.-C., Liszkowski, U., Soldati, A., Hobaiter, C.: A Gestural Repertoire of 1- to 2-Year-Old Human Children: In Search of the Ape Gestures. Animal Cognition. 22, 577–595 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-018-1213-z.
119.
Krupenye, C., Kano, F., Hirata, S., Call, J., Tomasello, M.: Great Apes Anticipate That Other Individuals Will Act According to False Beliefs. Science. 354, 110–114 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf8110.
120.
Plotnik, J.M., de Waal, F.B.M., Reiss, D.: Self-Recognition in an Asian Elephant. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 103, 17053–17057 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0608062103.
121.
Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M.: Shared Intentionality. Developmental Science. 10, 121–125 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00573.x.
122.
Call, J., Agnetta, B., Tomasello, M.: Cues That Chimpanzees Do and Do Not Use to Find Hidden Objects. Animal Cognition. 3, 23–34 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s100710050047.
123.
Call, J., Tomasello, M.: A Nonverbal False Belief Task: The Performance of Children and Great Apes. Child Development. 70, 381–395 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00028.
124.
Call, J., Tomasello, M.: Does the Chimpanzee Have a Theory of Mind? 30 Years Later. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 12, 187–192 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.02.010.
125.
Prior, H., Schwarz, A., Güntürkün, O.: Mirror-Induced Behavior in the Magpie (Pica pica): Evidence of Self-Recognition. PLoS Biology. 6, (2008). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0060202.
126.
Range, F., Viranyi, Z., Huber, L.: Selective Imitation in Domestic Dogs. Current Biology. 17, 868–872 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2007.04.026.
