1.
Cino, J.G.: Is a Polygraph a Reliable Lie Detector? The Conversation. (2018).
2.
Gudjonsson, G.H.: The Science-Based Pathways to Understanding False Confessions and Wrongful Convictions. Frontiers in Psychology. 12, (2021). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.633936.
3.
Hidden Victims:the Gendered Data Gap of Violent Crime | Watermark, https://watermark.silverchair.com/azaa100.pdf?token=AQECAHi208BE49Ooan9kkhW_Ercy7Dm3ZL_9Cf3qfKAc485ysgAAAtcwggLTBgkqhkiG9w0BBwagggLEMIICwAIBADCCArkGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAeBglghkgBZQMEAS4wEQQMqNSp0I_jMCxI4aGuAgEQgIICioHI0ftp6JxnahAjWTRT2-6wR8PcRLh12Yf26T2NlKvGNty30nA-o2QHUmMYgFjZH-M9GRzfB4UfuK9bP2a3geafD8XiwLL1Y6Y2rvPJIzGoWJpUfamGqq1largsllakGg1tBVeleTZKiz6F9ppv-dHYjf8cya0jdJxiBtX1ZL0TOvS2nLz3OQ-5niwxLh8lZ6O-XYfYZc1h4aefRi5rzui4nnm7YFr6E-XYvreNZxpffS0leJwOo227pfgvBozEiF1nQog2dujmWpj9UY2VvYv_fXXGIVvLpOwc0GCz77ORYQT9WmbvxlC3pnppXz4heRL2tOh8sdeWqVn6_k2J8pYh43rz_hBS4VJnosaV8_68Cx2d4PdTvUA7r7TVj0IyT62vNmTgBYk0g3AeMosqCBCKKPp2ES7Ml8udHPlkus2A_b8CHFyie4OGVdX7VebuTsWonGjoJziuES45aEGrfWVUMO_ATGsyCWfscUMbpGzGa6T_FYos-c2AL2WTvSXF6CZIeo7QDvUVeJ7kC5bG5knb7HFPal1bgiD20WGQ9jarHkUhvC-ZD9eSI0SDRsN7KEs67uCFHWJtFRfFuLqAuzB8HQxd3CYErjJY06N3FKS1ohhxI5B_Gp1L5WyWJe_D5Y1yeD-U1qG2SUq3bpOAymqQSZ5eLDRyfOcZfqOQZSzdj3PGVrw05jtHn-MttlJlqUxyqWirc3LGS9V-_zlLRa64CX4ckhtfBd_7rSxeK06A0UtAZM051RhEUwdZFiQIf50D1eT_6jfP6oZDVAiacRTIkrLg4_UijHZ5fNO5qeOcqpdNN9N9fE3ZqzdMtoHAupl25e59N2h1hskHRrNXhxoNojvnTlpQHbtM.
4.
Wells, G.L.: Psychological Science on Eyewitness Identification and Its Impact on Police Practices and Policies. American Psychologist. 75, 1316–1329 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000749.
5.
The Justice System Is Failing Victims and Survivors of Sexual Violence | The Psychologist, https://thepsychologist.bps.org.uk/justice-system-failing-victims-and-survivors-sexual-violence.
6.
Starr, D.: The Interview | The New Yorker, https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2013/12/09/the-interview-7.
7.
Schacter, D.L.: Are All of Your Memories Real? | Ted Talk, https://www.ted.com/talks/daniel_l_schacter_are_all_of_your_memories_real?utm_source=twitter.com&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=tedspread.
8.
Flowe, H.D.: Rethinking the Effects of Alcohol on Eyewitness Memory Accuracy: A Meta-Analysis of the Literature | Heather Flowe, https://www.heatherflowe.com/post/rethinking-the-effects-of-alcohol-on-eyewitness-memory-accuracy-a-meta-analysis-of-the-literature.
9.
Margot Van Sluytman Podcast: Sawbonna: Victims-Led Restorative Justice (Canada) | RJI, http://www.restorativejusticeinternational.com/2020/margot-van-sluytman-podcast-sawbonna-victims-led-restorative-justice-canada-august-2020/, (2020).
10.
The Psychology of Fake News. Routledge.
11.
Smith, J.: The Junk Science Cops Use to Decide You’re Lying | The Intercept, https://theintercept.com/2020/08/12/blueleaks-law-enforcement-police-lie-detection/.
12.
Wager, N.: Michael Jackson: As an Expert in Child Sexual Abuse Here’s What I Thought When I Watched Leaving Neverland. The Conversation. (2019).
13.
Hester, M., Lilley, S.-J.: Rape Investigation and Attrition in Acquaintance, Domestic Violence and Historical Rape Cases. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling. 14, 175–188 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.1469.
14.
Lyon, T.D.: Interviewing Children: Getting More with Less | YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7my1T4Ghf7A.
15.
Yoffe, E.: The Bad Science Behind Campus Response to Sexual Assault. The Atlantic. (2007).
16.
Protecting Vulnerable Witnesses | Economic and Social Research Council, https://esrc.ukri.org/news-events-and-publications/impact-case-studies/protecting-vulnerable-witnesses/.
17.
Starr, D.: This Psychologist Explains Why People Confess to Crimes They Didn’t Commit. Science. (2019).
18.
Loftus, E.: How Reliable Is Your Memory? | TED, https://www.ted.com/talks/elizabeth_loftus_the_fiction_of_memory/up-next.
19.
Nash, R.: Why You Should Doubt Your Memories |TEDxBrum | YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=USXT4Q609R8.
20.
Greenwood, V.: How Science Is Putting a New Face on Crime Solving | National Geographic, http://www.nationalgeographic.com/magazine/2016/07/forensic-science-justice-crime-evidence/.
21.
Hyman, I.E., Wulff, A.N., Thomas, A.K.: Crime Blindness: How Selective Attention and Inattentional Blindness Can Disrupt Eyewitness Awareness and Memory. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 5, 202–208 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732218786749.
22.
Rethinking the Effects of Alcohol on Eyewitness Memory Accuracy: A Meta-Analysis of the Literature | Heather D. Flowe, https://www.heatherflowe.com/post/rethinking-the-effects-of-alcohol-on-eyewitness-memory-accuracy-a-meta-analysis-of-the-literature.
23.
Loftus, E.F.: 25 Years of Eyewitness Science……Finally Pays Off. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 8, 556–557 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691613500995.
24.
Hope, L., Mullis, R., Gabbert, F.: Who? What? When? Using a Timeline Technique to Facilitate Recall of a Complex Event. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. 2, 20–24 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2013.01.002.
25.
Loftus, E.F.: Eavesdropping on Memory. Annual Review of Psychology. 68, 1–18 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-044138.
26.
Flowe, H.D., Humphries, J.E., Takarangi, M.K., Zelek, K., Karoğlu, N., Gabbert, F., Hope, L.: An Experimental Examination of the Effects of Alcohol Consumption and Exposure to Misleading Postevent Information on Remembering a Hypothetical Rape Scenario. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 33, 393–413 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3531.
27.
Valentine, T., Mesout, J.: Eyewitness Identification Under Stress in the London Dungeon. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 23, 151–161 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1463.
28.
Gabbert, F., Memon, A., Allan, K.: Memory Conformity: Can Eyewitnesses Influence Each Other’s Memories for an Event? Applied Cognitive Psychology. 17, 533–543 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.885.
29.
Semmler, C., Dunn, J., Mickes, L., Wixted, J.T.: The Role of Estimator Variables in Eyewitness Identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied. 24, 400–415 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000157.
30.
Fitzgerald, R.J., Price, H.L., Valentine, T.: Eyewitness Identification: Live, Photo, and Video Lineups. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law. 24, 307–325 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000164.
31.
200 Exonerated: Too Many Wrongly Convicted, https://www.innocenceproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/ip_200.pdf.
32.
Brendan Dassey: A True Story of a False Confession | YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7jDf5wWdDQ, (2016).
33.
Memon, A.: Why Eyewitnesses Give False Evidence – and How We Can Stop Them. The Conversation. (2016).
34.
Savage, S.P., Milne, B.: Miscarriages of Justice. In: Handbook of Criminal Investigation. pp. 610–627. Routledge, Abingdon (2011).
35.
Finkelhor, D.: Sexual Abuse. Journal of Psychotherapy & The Family. 2, 53–65 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1300/J287v02n02_06.
36.
Fleming, J., Mullen, P., Bammer, G.: A Study of Potential Risk Factors for Sexual Abuse in Childhood. Child Abuse & Neglect. 21, 49–58 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0145-2134(96)00126-3.
37.
Horvath, M.A.H., Davidson, J.C., Grove-Hills, J., Gekoski, A., Choak, C.: "It’s a Lonely Journey”: A Rapid Evidence Assessment on Intrafamilial Child Sexual Abuse | Children’s Commissioner for England, https://www.childrenscommissioner.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Its-a-lonely-journey-REA-on-Intrafamilial-child-sexual-abuse.pdf.
38.
Gregory, N.: Offender Profiling: A Review of the Literature. The British Journal of Forensic Practice. 7, 29–34 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1108/14636646200500019.
39.
Davidson, J., Bogaerts, S., Caretti, V., Scally, M.: Enhancing Police and Industry Practice in the Prevention of Online Child Sexual Abuse, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309771279_Enhancing_Police_and_Industry_Practice_in_the_Prevention_of_Online_Child_Sexual_Abuse, (2016). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.26099.32807.
40.
DeMarco, J.N., Cheevers, C., Davidson, J., Bogaerts, S., Pace, U., Aiken, M., Caretti, V., Schimmenti, A., Bifulco, A.: Digital Dangers and Cyber-Victimisation: A Study of European Adolescent Online Risky Behaviour for Sexual Exploitation. Clinical Neuropsychiatry. 14, 104–112 (2017).
41.
Canter, D.V.: Offender Profiling. In: The Cambridge Handbook of Forensic Psychology. pp. 236–241. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010).
42.
Cognitive and Human Factors in Expert Decision Making: Six Fallacies and the Eight Sources of Bias | Analytical Chemistry, https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.analchem.0c00704.
43.
Dowden, C., Bennell, C., Bloomfield, S.: Advances in Offender Profiling: A Systematic Review of the Profiling Literature Published Over the Past Three Decades. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology. 22, 44–56 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-007-9000-9.
44.
Mokros, A., Alison, L.J.: Is Offender Profiling Possible? Testing the Predicted Homology of Crime Scene Actions and Background Characteristics in a Sample of Rapists. Legal and Criminological Psychology. 7, 25–43 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1348/135532502168360.
45.
Torres, A.N., Boccaccini, M.T., Miller, H.A.: Perceptions of the Validity and Utility of Criminal Profiling Among Forensic Psychologists and Psychiatrists. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice. 37, 51–58 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.37.1.51.
46.
Goodwill, A.M., Alison, L.J., Beech, A.R.: What Works in Offender Profiling? A Comparison of Typological, Thematic, and Multivariate Models. Behavioral Sciences & the Law. 27, 507–529 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.867.
47.
Goodwill, A.M., Alison, L.J.: When Is Profiling Possible? Offense Planning and Aggression as Moderators in Predicting Offender Age From Victim Age in Stranger Rape. Behavioral Sciences & the Law. 25, 823–840 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.778.
48.
Alison, L., Goodwill, A., Almond, L., Heuvel, C., Winter, J.: Pragmatic Solutions to Offender Profiling and Behavioural Investigative Advice. Legal and Criminological Psychology. 15, 115–132 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1348/135532509X463347.
49.
The Real Boon | The Psychologist, https://thepsychologist.bps.org.uk/volume-16/edition-6/real-boon.
50.
Luke, T.J.: Lessons From Pinocchio: Cues to Deception May Be Highly Exaggerated. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 14, 646–671 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619838258.
51.
Vrij, A., Granhag, P.A.: Eliciting Cues to Deception and Truth: What Matters Are the Questions Asked. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. 1, 110–117 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2012.02.004.
52.
Vrij, A., Fisher, R.P., Blank, H.: A Cognitive Approach to Lie Detection: A Meta-Analysis. Legal and Criminological Psychology. 22, 1–21 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12088.
53.
Ten Brinke, L., Porter, S.: Cry Me a River: Identifying the Behavioral Consequences of Extremely High-Stakes Interpersonal Deception. Law and Human Behavior. 36, 469–477 (2012).
54.
Levine, T.R., Serota, K.B., Shulman, H.C.: The Impact of Lie to Me on Viewers’ Actual Ability to Detect Deception. Communication Research. 37, 847–856 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650210362686.
55.
Vrij, A., Granhag, P.A.: Eliciting Cues to Deception and Truth: What Matters Are the Questions Asked. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. 1, 110–117 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2012.02.004.
56.
Vrij, A., Leal, S., Deeb, H., Chan, S., Khader, M., Chai, W., Chin, J.: Lying About Flying: The Efficacy of the Information Protocol and Model Statement for Detecting Deceit. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 34, 241–255 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3614.
57.
Jordan, S., Brimbal, L., Wallace, D.B., Kassin, S.M., Hartwig, M., Street, C.N.H.: A Test of the Micro‐expressions Training Tool: Does It Improve Lie Detection? Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling. 16, 222–235 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.1532.
58.
Hudson, C.A., Vrij, A., Akehurst, L., Hope, L.: The Devil Is in the Detail: Deception and Consistency Over Repeated Interviews. Psychology, Crime & Law. 25, 752–770 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2019.1574790.
59.
Vrij, A., Fisher, R.P., Blank, H.: A Cognitive Approach to Lie Detection: A Meta-Analysis. Legal and Criminological Psychology. 22, 1–21 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12088.
60.
Hester, M., Lilley, S.-J.: More Than Support to Court. International Review of Victimology. 24, 313–328 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1177/0269758017742717.
61.
van der Bruggen, M., Grubb, A.: A Review of the Literature Relating to Rape Victim Blaming: An Analysis of the Impact of Observer and Victim Characteristics on Attribution of Blame in Rape Cases. Aggression and Violent Behavior. 19, 523–531 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2014.07.008.
62.
Shapland, J., Atkinson, A., Atkinson, H., Colledge, E., Dignan, J., Howes, M., Johnstone, J., Robinson, G., Sorsby, A.: Situating Restorative Justice Within Criminal Justice. Theoretical Criminology. 10, 505–532 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480606068876.
63.
Burman, M.: Evidencing Sexual Assault: Women in the Witness Box. Probation Journal. 56, 379–398 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1177/0264550509346506.
64.
Lisak, D., Gardinier, L., Nicksa, S.C., Cote, A.M.: False Allegations of Sexual Assualt: An Analysis of Ten Years of Reported Cases. Violence Against Women. 16, 1318–1334 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801210387747.
65.
Kelly, L., Lovett, J., Regan, L.: A Gap or a Chasm?: Attrition in Reported Rape Cases. Home Office Research, Development and Statistics Directorate, London (2005).
66.
Hester, M., Lilley, S.-J.: Rape Investigation and Attrition in Acquaintance, Domestic Violence and Historical Rape Cases. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling. 14, 175–188 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.1469.
67.
Horvath, M.A.H., Tong, S., Williams, E.: Critical Issues in Rape Investigation: An Overview of Reform in England and Wales. Ehe Journal of Criminal Justice Research. 1, 1–18 (2011).
68.
Daly, K.: Conventional and Innovative Justice Responses to Sexual Violence, https://aifs.gov.au/publications/conventional-and-innovative-justice-responses-sexual-violence, (2011).
69.
Hayes, R.M., Lorenz, K., Bell, K.A.: Victim Blaming Others. Feminist Criminology. 8, 202–220 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085113484788.
70.
Sleath, E., Bull, R.: Police Perceptions of Rape Victims and the Impact on Case Decision Making: A Systematic Review. Aggression and Violent Behavior. 34, 102–112 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2017.02.003.
71.
Strömwall, L.A., Landström, S., Alfredsson, H.: Perpetrator Characteristics and Blame Attributions in a Stranger Rape Situation. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context. 6, 63–67 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpal.2014.06.002.
72.
Dinisman, T., Moroz, A.: Understanding Victims of Crime: The Impact of the Crime and Support Needs, https://web.archive.org/web/20180418225936/https://www.victimsupport.org.uk/sites/default/files/VS_Understanding%20victims%20of%20crime_web.pdf, (2017).
73.
Borum, R.: Radicalization into Violent Extremism I: A Review of Social Science Theories. Journal of Strategic Security. 4, 7–36 (2011). https://doi.org/10.5038/1944-0472.4.4.1.
74.
King, M., Taylor, D.M.: The Radicalization of Homegrown Jihadists: A Review of Theoretical Models and Social Psychological Evidence. Terrorism and Political Violence. 23, 602–622 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2011.587064.
75.
Silke, A.: The Internet & Terrorist Radicalisation: The Psychological Dimension. In: Terrorism and the Internet: Threats - Target Groups - Deradicalisation Strategies -- Volume 67 NATO Science for Peace and Security Series - E: Human and Societal Dynamics. pp. 27–39 (2010).
76.
Kruglanski, A.W., Gelfand, M.J., Bélanger, J.J., Sheveland, A., Hetiarachchi, M., Gunaratna, R.: The Psychology of Radicalization and Deradicalization: How Significance Quest Impacts Violent Extremism. Political Psychology. 35, (2014).
77.
Kruglanski, A.W., Jasko, K., Chernikova, M., Dugas, M., Webber, D.: To the Fringe and Back: Violent Extremism and the Psychology of Deviance. American Psychologist. 72, 217–230 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000091.
78.
Webber, D., Klein, K., Kruglanski, A., Brizi, A., Merari, A.: Divergent Paths to Martyrdom and Significance Among Suicide Attackers. Terrorism and Political Violence. 29, 852–874 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2015.1075979.
79.
Webber, D., Babush, M., Schori-Eyal, N., Vazeou-Nieuwenhuis, A., Hettiarachchi, M., Bélanger, J.J., Moyano, M., Trujillo, H.M., Gunaratna, R., Kruglanski, A.W., Gelfand, M.J.: The Road to Extremism: Field and Experimental Evidence That Significance Loss-Induced Need for Closure Fosters Radicalization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 114, 270–285 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000111.
80.
Webber, D., Chernikova, M., Kruglanski, A.W., Gelfand, M.J., Hettiarachchi, M., Gunaratna, R., Lafreniere, M.-A., Belanger, J.J.: Deradicalizing Detained Terrorists. Political Psychology. 39, 539–556 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12428.
81.
Scherr, K.C., Redlich, A.D., Kassin, S.M.: Cumulative Disadvantage: A Psychological Framework for Understanding How Innocence Can Lead to Confession, Wrongful Conviction, and Beyond. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 15, 353–383 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619896608.
82.
Vrij, A., Meissner, C.A., Fisher, R.P., Kassin, S.M., Morgan, C.A., Kleinman, S.M.: Psychological Perspectives on Interrogation. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 12, 927–955 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617706515.
83.
Kassin, S.M.: On the Psychology of Confessions: Does Innocence Put Innocents at Risk? American Psychologist. 60, 215–228 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.60.3.215.
84.
Nesterak, E.: Coerced to Confess: The Psychology of False Confessions. Behavioural Scientist. (2014).
85.
Kassin, S.M.: The Social Psychology of False Confessions. Social Issues and Policy Review. 9, 25–51 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12009.
86.
Meissner, C.A., Kelly, C.E., Woestehoff, S.A.: Improving the Effectiveness of Suspect Interrogations. Annual Review of Law and Social Science. 11, 211–233 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-120814-121657.
87.
Hill, C., Memon, A., McGeorge, P.: The Role of Confirmation Bias in Suspect Interviews: A Systematic Evaluation. Legal and Criminological Psychology. 13, 357–371 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1348/135532507X238682.
88.
Maras, K.L., Mulcahy, S., Memon, A., Picariello, F., Bowler, D.M.: Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Self-Administered Interview for Witnesses with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 28, 693–701 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3055.
89.
Mattison, M.A., Dando, C.J.: Police Officers’ and Registered Intermediaries’ Use of Drawing During Investigative Interviews With Vulnerable Witnesses. Psychology, Crime and Law. 26, 167–185 (2020).
90.
Special Measures | The Crown Prosecution Service, https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/special-measures.
91.
Risan, P., Milne, R., Binder, P.-E.: Trauma Narratives: Recommendations for Investigative Interviewing. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law. 27, 678–694 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2020.1742237.
92.
Bull, R.: The Investigative Interviewing of Children and Other Vulnerable Witnesses: Psychological Research and Working/professional Practice. Legal and Criminological Psychology. 15, 5–23 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1348/014466509X440160.
93.
Maras, K., Marshall, I., Sands, C.: Mock Juror Perceptions of Credibility and Culpability in an Autistic Defendant. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 49, 996–1010 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-3803-7.
94.
La Rooy, D., Lamb, M.E., Memon, A.: Forensic Interviews with Children in Scotland: A Survey of Interview Practices Among Police. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology. 26, 26–34 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-010-9072-9.
95.
Baugerud, G., Johnson, M.S., Hansen, H.B.G., Magnussen, S., Lamb, M.E.: Forensic Interviews With Preschool Children: An Analysis of Extended Interviews in Norway (2015–2017). Applied Cognitive Psychology. 34, 654–663 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3647.
96.
Memon, A., Meissner, C.A., Fraser, J.: The Cognitive Interview: A Meta-Analytic Review and Study Space Analysis of the Past 25 Years. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law. 16, 340–372 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020518.
97.
Review of the NICHD Protocol, https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/143689305.pdf.
98.
ABE Guidance, https://www.cps.gov.uk/sites/default/files/documents/legal_guidance/best_evidence_in_criminal_proceedings.pdf.
99.
Brubacher, S.P., Powell, M.B.: Best-Practice Interviewing Spans Many Contexts [open access]. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. 8, 398–402 (2019).
100.
Leach, C.L., Powell, M.B.: Forensic Risk Assessment Interviews With Youth: How Do We Elicit the Most Reliable and Complete Information? Psychiatry, Psychology and Law. 1–13 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2020.1734982.
101.
Eastwood, J., Snook, B., Luther, K.: Establishing the Most Effective Way to Deliver the Sketch Procedure to Enhance Interviewee Free Recall. Psychology, Crime & Law. 25, 482–493 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2018.1538416.
102.
Rachlew, A.: From Interrogating to Interviewing Suspects of Terror: Towards a New Mindset | Penal Reform International, https://www.penalreform.org/blog/interrogating-interviewing-suspects-terror-towards-new-mindset/.
103.
We Are the ‘Exonerated 5.’ What Happened to Us Isn’t Past, It’s Present. The New York Times. (2021).
