1.
Cino JG. Is a Polygraph a Reliable Lie Detector? The Conversation. Published online 2018. https://theconversation.com/is-a-polygraph-a-reliable-lie-detector-104043
2.
Gudjonsson GH. The Science-Based Pathways to Understanding False Confessions and Wrongful Convictions. Frontiers in Psychology. 2021;12. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.633936
3.
Hidden Victims:the Gendered Data Gap of Violent Crime | Watermark. https://watermark.silverchair.com/azaa100.pdf?token=AQECAHi208BE49Ooan9kkhW_Ercy7Dm3ZL_9Cf3qfKAc485ysgAAAtcwggLTBgkqhkiG9w0BBwagggLEMIICwAIBADCCArkGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAeBglghkgBZQMEAS4wEQQMqNSp0I_jMCxI4aGuAgEQgIICioHI0ftp6JxnahAjWTRT2-6wR8PcRLh12Yf26T2NlKvGNty30nA-o2QHUmMYgFjZH-M9GRzfB4UfuK9bP2a3geafD8XiwLL1Y6Y2rvPJIzGoWJpUfamGqq1largsllakGg1tBVeleTZKiz6F9ppv-dHYjf8cya0jdJxiBtX1ZL0TOvS2nLz3OQ-5niwxLh8lZ6O-XYfYZc1h4aefRi5rzui4nnm7YFr6E-XYvreNZxpffS0leJwOo227pfgvBozEiF1nQog2dujmWpj9UY2VvYv_fXXGIVvLpOwc0GCz77ORYQT9WmbvxlC3pnppXz4heRL2tOh8sdeWqVn6_k2J8pYh43rz_hBS4VJnosaV8_68Cx2d4PdTvUA7r7TVj0IyT62vNmTgBYk0g3AeMosqCBCKKPp2ES7Ml8udHPlkus2A_b8CHFyie4OGVdX7VebuTsWonGjoJziuES45aEGrfWVUMO_ATGsyCWfscUMbpGzGa6T_FYos-c2AL2WTvSXF6CZIeo7QDvUVeJ7kC5bG5knb7HFPal1bgiD20WGQ9jarHkUhvC-ZD9eSI0SDRsN7KEs67uCFHWJtFRfFuLqAuzB8HQxd3CYErjJY06N3FKS1ohhxI5B_Gp1L5WyWJe_D5Y1yeD-U1qG2SUq3bpOAymqQSZ5eLDRyfOcZfqOQZSzdj3PGVrw05jtHn-MttlJlqUxyqWirc3LGS9V-_zlLRa64CX4ckhtfBd_7rSxeK06A0UtAZM051RhEUwdZFiQIf50D1eT_6jfP6oZDVAiacRTIkrLg4_UijHZ5fNO5qeOcqpdNN9N9fE3ZqzdMtoHAupl25e59N2h1hskHRrNXhxoNojvnTlpQHbtM
4.
Wells GL. Psychological Science on Eyewitness Identification and Its Impact on Police Practices and Policies. American Psychologist. 2020;75(9):1316-1329. doi:10.1037/amp0000749
5.
The Justice System Is Failing Victims and Survivors of Sexual Violence | The Psychologist. https://thepsychologist.bps.org.uk/justice-system-failing-victims-and-survivors-sexual-violence
6.
Starr D. The Interview | The New Yorker. Published 2013. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2013/12/09/the-interview-7
7.
Schacter DL. Are All of Your Memories Real? | Ted Talk. https://www.ted.com/talks/daniel_l_schacter_are_all_of_your_memories_real?utm_source=twitter.com&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=tedspread
8.
Flowe HD. Rethinking the Effects of Alcohol on Eyewitness Memory Accuracy: A Meta-Analysis of the Literature | Heather Flowe. https://www.heatherflowe.com/post/rethinking-the-effects-of-alcohol-on-eyewitness-memory-accuracy-a-meta-analysis-of-the-literature
9.
Margot Van Sluytman Podcast: Sawbonna: Victims-Led Restorative Justice (Canada) | RJI. Published online 2020. http://www.restorativejusticeinternational.com/2020/margot-van-sluytman-podcast-sawbonna-victims-led-restorative-justice-canada-august-2020/
10.
The Psychology of Fake News. Routledge https://librarysearch.royalholloway.ac.uk/permalink/f/l6p82e/44ROY_ALMA_DS51124866820002671
11.
Smith J. The Junk Science Cops Use to Decide You’re Lying | The Intercept. Published 12 September 2020. https://theintercept.com/2020/08/12/blueleaks-law-enforcement-police-lie-detection/
12.
Wager N. Michael Jackson: As an Expert in Child Sexual Abuse Here’s What I Thought When I Watched Leaving Neverland. The Conversation. Published online 2019. https://theconversation.com/michael-jackson-as-an-expert-in-child-sexual-abuse-heres-what-i-thought-when-i-watched-leaving-neverland-113160
13.
Hester M, Lilley SJ. Rape Investigation and Attrition in Acquaintance, Domestic Violence and Historical Rape Cases. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling. 2017;14(2):175-188. doi:10.1002/jip.1469
14.
Lyon TD. Interviewing Children: Getting More with Less | YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7my1T4Ghf7A
15.
Yoffe E. The Bad Science Behind Campus Response to Sexual Assault. The Atlantic. Published online 2007. https://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2017/09/the-bad-science-behind-campus-response-to-sexual-assault/539211/
16.
Protecting Vulnerable Witnesses | Economic and Social Research Council. https://esrc.ukri.org/news-events-and-publications/impact-case-studies/protecting-vulnerable-witnesses/
17.
Starr D. This Psychologist Explains Why People Confess to Crimes They Didn’t Commit. Science. Published online 2019. https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2019/06/psychologist-explains-why-people-confess-crimes-they-didn-t-commit
18.
Loftus E. How Reliable Is Your Memory? | TED. https://www.ted.com/talks/elizabeth_loftus_the_fiction_of_memory/up-next
19.
Nash R. Why You Should Doubt Your Memories |TEDxBrum | YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=USXT4Q609R8
20.
Greenwood V. How Science Is Putting a New Face on Crime Solving | National Geographic. Published 2016. http://www.nationalgeographic.com/magazine/2016/07/forensic-science-justice-crime-evidence/
21.
Hyman IE, Wulff AN, Thomas AK. Crime Blindness: How Selective Attention and Inattentional Blindness Can Disrupt Eyewitness Awareness and Memory. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2018;5(2):202-208. doi:10.1177/2372732218786749
22.
Rethinking the Effects of Alcohol on Eyewitness Memory Accuracy: A Meta-Analysis of the Literature | Heather D. Flowe. https://www.heatherflowe.com/post/rethinking-the-effects-of-alcohol-on-eyewitness-memory-accuracy-a-meta-analysis-of-the-literature
23.
Loftus EF. 25 Years of Eyewitness Science……Finally Pays Off. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2013;8(5):556-557. doi:10.1177/1745691613500995
24.
Hope L, Mullis R, Gabbert F. Who? What? When? Using a Timeline Technique to Facilitate Recall of a Complex Event. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. 2013;2(1):20-24. doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2013.01.002
25.
Loftus EF. Eavesdropping on Memory. Annual Review of Psychology. 2017;68(1):1-18. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-044138
26.
Flowe HD, Humphries JE, Takarangi MK, et al. An Experimental Examination of the Effects of Alcohol Consumption and Exposure to Misleading Postevent Information on Remembering a Hypothetical Rape Scenario. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 2019;33(3):393-413. doi:10.1002/acp.3531
27.
Valentine T, Mesout J. Eyewitness Identification Under Stress in the London Dungeon. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 2009;23(2):151-161. doi:10.1002/acp.1463
28.
Gabbert F, Memon A, Allan K. Memory Conformity: Can Eyewitnesses Influence Each Other’s Memories for an Event? Applied Cognitive Psychology. 2003;17(5):533-543. doi:10.1002/acp.885
29.
Semmler C, Dunn J, Mickes L, Wixted JT. The Role of Estimator Variables in Eyewitness Identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied. 2018;24(3):400-415. doi:10.1037/xap0000157
30.
Fitzgerald RJ, Price HL, Valentine T. Eyewitness Identification: Live, Photo, and Video Lineups. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law. 2018;24(3):307-325. doi:10.1037/law0000164
31.
200 Exonerated: Too Many Wrongly Convicted. https://www.innocenceproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/ip_200.pdf
32.
Brendan Dassey: A True Story of a False Confession | YouTube. Published online 2016. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7jDf5wWdDQ
33.
Memon A. Why Eyewitnesses Give False Evidence – and How We Can Stop Them. The Conversation. Published online 2016. https://theconversation.com/why-eyewitnesses-give-false-evidence-and-how-we-can-stop-them-67254
34.
Savage SP, Milne B. Miscarriages of Justice. In: Handbook of Criminal Investigation. Routledge; 2011:610-627.
35.
Finkelhor D. Sexual Abuse. Journal of Psychotherapy & The Family. 1986;2(2):53-65. doi:10.1300/J287v02n02_06
36.
Fleming J, Mullen P, Bammer G. A Study of Potential Risk Factors for Sexual Abuse in Childhood. Child Abuse & Neglect. 1997;21(1):49-58. doi:10.1016/S0145-2134(96)00126-3
37.
Horvath MAH, Davidson JC, Grove-Hills J, Gekoski A, Choak C. "It’s a Lonely Journey”: A Rapid Evidence Assessment on Intrafamilial Child Sexual Abuse | Children’s Commissioner for England. https://www.childrenscommissioner.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Its-a-lonely-journey-REA-on-Intrafamilial-child-sexual-abuse.pdf
38.
Gregory N. Offender Profiling: A Review of the Literature. The British Journal of Forensic Practice. 2005;7(3):29-34. doi:10.1108/14636646200500019
39.
Davidson J, Bogaerts S, Caretti V, Scally M. Enhancing Police and Industry Practice in the Prevention of Online Child Sexual Abuse. Published online 2016. doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.26099.32807
40.
DeMarco JN, Cheevers C, Davidson J, et al. Digital Dangers and Cyber-Victimisation: A Study of European Adolescent Online Risky Behaviour for Sexual Exploitation. Clinical Neuropsychiatry. 2017;14(1):104-112. https://repository.uel.ac.uk/item/84x42
41.
Canter DV. Offender Profiling. In: The Cambridge Handbook of Forensic Psychology. Cambridge University Press; 2010:236-241.
42.
Cognitive and Human Factors in Expert Decision Making: Six Fallacies and the Eight Sources of Bias | Analytical Chemistry. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.analchem.0c00704
43.
Dowden C, Bennell C, Bloomfield S. Advances in Offender Profiling: A Systematic Review of the Profiling Literature Published Over the Past Three Decades. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology. 2007;22(1):44-56. doi:10.1007/s11896-007-9000-9
44.
Mokros A, Alison LJ. Is Offender Profiling Possible? Testing the Predicted Homology of Crime Scene Actions and Background Characteristics in a Sample of Rapists. Legal and Criminological Psychology. 2002;7(1):25-43. doi:10.1348/135532502168360
45.
Torres AN, Boccaccini MT, Miller HA. Perceptions of the Validity and Utility of Criminal Profiling Among Forensic Psychologists and Psychiatrists. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice. 2006;37(1):51-58. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.37.1.51
46.
Goodwill AM, Alison LJ, Beech AR. What Works in Offender Profiling? A Comparison of Typological, Thematic, and Multivariate Models. Behavioral Sciences & the Law. 2009;27(4):507-529. doi:10.1002/bsl.867
47.
Goodwill AM, Alison LJ. When Is Profiling Possible? Offense Planning and Aggression as Moderators in Predicting Offender Age From Victim Age in Stranger Rape. Behavioral Sciences & the Law. 2007;25(6):823-840. doi:10.1002/bsl.778
48.
Alison L, Goodwill A, Almond L, Heuvel C, Winter J. Pragmatic Solutions to Offender Profiling and Behavioural Investigative Advice. Legal and Criminological Psychology. 2010;15(1):115-132. doi:10.1348/135532509X463347
49.
The Real Boon | The Psychologist. Published 2003. https://thepsychologist.bps.org.uk/volume-16/edition-6/real-boon
50.
Luke TJ. Lessons From Pinocchio: Cues to Deception May Be Highly Exaggerated. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2019;14(4):646-671. doi:10.1177/1745691619838258
51.
Vrij A, Granhag PA. Eliciting Cues to Deception and Truth: What Matters Are the Questions Asked. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. 2012;1(2):110-117. doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2012.02.004
52.
Vrij A, Fisher RP, Blank H. A Cognitive Approach to Lie Detection: A Meta-Analysis. Legal and Criminological Psychology. 2017;22(1):1-21. doi:10.1111/lcrp.12088
53.
Ten Brinke L, Porter S. Cry Me a River: Identifying the Behavioral Consequences of Extremely High-Stakes Interpersonal Deception. Law and Human Behavior. 2012;36(6):469-477. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43586871
54.
Levine TR, Serota KB, Shulman HC. The Impact of Lie to Me on Viewers’ Actual Ability to Detect Deception. Communication Research. 2010;37(6):847-856. doi:10.1177/0093650210362686
55.
Vrij A, Granhag PA. Eliciting Cues to Deception and Truth: What Matters Are the Questions Asked. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. 2012;1(2):110-117. doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2012.02.004
56.
Vrij A, Leal S, Deeb H, et al. Lying About Flying: The Efficacy of the Information Protocol and Model Statement for Detecting Deceit. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 2020;34(1):241-255. doi:10.1002/acp.3614
57.
Jordan S, Brimbal L, Wallace DB, Kassin SM, Hartwig M, Street CNH. A Test of the Micro‐expressions Training Tool: Does It Improve Lie Detection? Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling. 2019;16(3):222-235. doi:10.1002/jip.1532
58.
Hudson CA, Vrij A, Akehurst L, Hope L. The Devil Is in the Detail: Deception and Consistency Over Repeated Interviews. Psychology, Crime & Law. 2019;25(7):752-770. doi:10.1080/1068316X.2019.1574790
59.
Vrij A, Fisher RP, Blank H. A Cognitive Approach to Lie Detection: A Meta-Analysis. Legal and Criminological Psychology. 2017;22(1):1-21. doi:10.1111/lcrp.12088
60.
Hester M, Lilley SJ. More Than Support to Court. International Review of Victimology. 2018;24(3):313-328. doi:10.1177/0269758017742717
61.
van der Bruggen M, Grubb A. A Review of the Literature Relating to Rape Victim Blaming: An Analysis of the Impact of Observer and Victim Characteristics on Attribution of Blame in Rape Cases. Aggression and Violent Behavior. 2014;19(5):523-531. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2014.07.008
62.
Shapland J, Atkinson A, Atkinson H, et al. Situating Restorative Justice Within Criminal Justice. Theoretical Criminology. 2006;10(4):505-532. doi:10.1177/1362480606068876
63.
Burman M. Evidencing Sexual Assault: Women in the Witness Box. Probation Journal. 2009;56(4):379-398. doi:10.1177/0264550509346506
64.
Lisak D, Gardinier L, Nicksa SC, Cote AM. False Allegations of Sexual Assualt: An Analysis of Ten Years of Reported Cases. Violence Against Women. 2010;16(12):1318-1334. doi:10.1177/1077801210387747
65.
Kelly L, Lovett J, Regan L. A Gap or a Chasm?: Attrition in Reported Rape Cases. Vol Home Office Research Study. Home Office Research, Development and Statistics Directorate; 2005.
66.
Hester M, Lilley SJ. Rape Investigation and Attrition in Acquaintance, Domestic Violence and Historical Rape Cases. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling. 2017;14(2):175-188. doi:10.1002/jip.1469
67.
Horvath MAH, Tong S, Williams E. Critical Issues in Rape Investigation: An Overview of Reform in England and Wales. Ehe Journal of Criminal Justice Research. 2011;1(2):1-18. http://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/6983/
68.
Daly K. Conventional and Innovative Justice Responses to Sexual Violence. 2011;(12). https://aifs.gov.au/publications/conventional-and-innovative-justice-responses-sexual-violence
69.
Hayes RM, Lorenz K, Bell KA. Victim Blaming Others. Feminist Criminology. 2013;8(3):202-220. doi:10.1177/1557085113484788
70.
Sleath E, Bull R. Police Perceptions of Rape Victims and the Impact on Case Decision Making: A Systematic Review. Aggression and Violent Behavior. 2017;34:102-112. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2017.02.003
71.
Strömwall LA, Landström S, Alfredsson H. Perpetrator Characteristics and Blame Attributions in a Stranger Rape Situation. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context. 2014;6(2):63-67. doi:10.1016/j.ejpal.2014.06.002
72.
Dinisman T, Moroz A. Understanding Victims of Crime: The Impact of the Crime and Support Needs. Published online 2017. https://web.archive.org/web/20180418225936/https://www.victimsupport.org.uk/sites/default/files/VS_Understanding%20victims%20of%20crime_web.pdf
73.
Borum R. Radicalization into Violent Extremism I: A Review of Social Science Theories. Journal of Strategic Security. 2011;4(4):7-36. doi:10.5038/1944-0472.4.4.1
74.
King M, Taylor DM. The Radicalization of Homegrown Jihadists: A Review of Theoretical Models and Social Psychological Evidence. Terrorism and Political Violence. 2011;23(4):602-622. doi:10.1080/09546553.2011.587064
75.
Silke A. The Internet & Terrorist Radicalisation: The Psychological Dimension. In: Terrorism and the Internet: Threats - Target Groups - Deradicalisation Strategies -- Volume 67 NATO Science for Peace and Security Series - E: Human and Societal Dynamics. ; 2010:27-39.
76.
Kruglanski AW, Gelfand MJ, Bélanger JJ, Sheveland A, Hetiarachchi M, Gunaratna R. The Psychology of Radicalization and Deradicalization: How Significance Quest Impacts Violent Extremism. Political Psychology. 2014;35(S1). https://www.jstor.org/stable/43783789
77.
Kruglanski AW, Jasko K, Chernikova M, Dugas M, Webber D. To the Fringe and Back: Violent Extremism and the Psychology of Deviance. American Psychologist. 2017;72(3):217-230. doi:10.1037/amp0000091
78.
Webber D, Klein K, Kruglanski A, Brizi A, Merari A. Divergent Paths to Martyrdom and Significance Among Suicide Attackers. Terrorism and Political Violence. 2017;29(5):852-874. doi:10.1080/09546553.2015.1075979
79.
Webber D, Babush M, Schori-Eyal N, et al. The Road to Extremism: Field and Experimental Evidence That Significance Loss-Induced Need for Closure Fosters Radicalization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2018;114(2):270-285. doi:10.1037/pspi0000111
80.
Webber D, Chernikova M, Kruglanski AW, et al. Deradicalizing Detained Terrorists. Political Psychology. 2018;39(3):539-556. doi:10.1111/pops.12428
81.
Scherr KC, Redlich AD, Kassin SM. Cumulative Disadvantage: A Psychological Framework for Understanding How Innocence Can Lead to Confession, Wrongful Conviction, and Beyond. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2020;15(2):353-383. doi:10.1177/1745691619896608
82.
Vrij A, Meissner CA, Fisher RP, Kassin SM, Morgan CA, Kleinman SM. Psychological Perspectives on Interrogation. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2017;12(6):927-955. doi:10.1177/1745691617706515
83.
Kassin SM. On the Psychology of Confessions: Does Innocence Put Innocents at Risk? American Psychologist. 2005;60(3):215-228. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.60.3.215
84.
Nesterak E. Coerced to Confess: The Psychology of False Confessions. Behavioural Scientist. Published online 2014. https://behavioralscientist.org/coerced-to-confess-the-psychology-of-false-confessions/
85.
Kassin SM. The Social Psychology of False Confessions. Social Issues and Policy Review. 2015;9(1):25-51. doi:10.1111/sipr.12009
86.
Meissner CA, Kelly CE, Woestehoff SA. Improving the Effectiveness of Suspect Interrogations. Annual Review of Law and Social Science. 2015;11(1):211-233. doi:10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-120814-121657
87.
Hill C, Memon A, McGeorge P. The Role of Confirmation Bias in Suspect Interviews: A Systematic Evaluation. Legal and Criminological Psychology. 2008;13(2):357-371. doi:10.1348/135532507X238682
88.
Maras KL, Mulcahy S, Memon A, Picariello F, Bowler DM. Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Self-Administered Interview for Witnesses with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 2014;28(5):693-701. doi:10.1002/acp.3055
89.
Mattison MA, Dando CJ. Police Officers’ and Registered Intermediaries’ Use of Drawing During Investigative Interviews With Vulnerable Witnesses. Psychology, Crime and Law. 2020;26(2):167-185. https://westminsterresearch.westminster.ac.uk/item/qw87w/police-officers-and-registered-intermediaries-use-of-drawing-during-investigative-interviews-with-vulnerable-witnesses
90.
Special Measures | The Crown Prosecution Service. https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/special-measures
91.
Risan P, Milne R, Binder PE. Trauma Narratives: Recommendations for Investigative Interviewing. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law. 2020;27(4):678-694. doi:10.1080/13218719.2020.1742237
92.
Bull R. The Investigative Interviewing of Children and Other Vulnerable Witnesses: Psychological Research and Working/professional Practice. Legal and Criminological Psychology. 2010;15(1):5-23. doi:10.1348/014466509X440160
93.
Maras K, Marshall I, Sands C. Mock Juror Perceptions of Credibility and Culpability in an Autistic Defendant. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 2019;49(3):996-1010. doi:10.1007/s10803-018-3803-7
94.
La Rooy D, Lamb ME, Memon A. Forensic Interviews with Children in Scotland: A Survey of Interview Practices Among Police. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology. 2011;26(1):26-34. doi:10.1007/s11896-010-9072-9
95.
Baugerud G, Johnson MS, Hansen HBG, Magnussen S, Lamb ME. Forensic Interviews With Preschool Children: An Analysis of Extended Interviews in Norway (2015–2017). Applied Cognitive Psychology. 2020;34(3):654-663. doi:10.1002/acp.3647
96.
Memon A, Meissner CA, Fraser J. The Cognitive Interview: A Meta-Analytic Review and Study Space Analysis of the Past 25 Years. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law. 2010;16(4):340-372. doi:10.1037/a0020518
97.
Review of the NICHD Protocol. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/143689305.pdf
98.
ABE Guidance. https://www.cps.gov.uk/sites/default/files/documents/legal_guidance/best_evidence_in_criminal_proceedings.pdf
99.
Brubacher SP, Powell MB. Best-Practice Interviewing Spans Many Contexts [open access]. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. 2019;8:398-402. http://www.saveservices.org/wp-content/uploads/Best-PracticeInterviewingSpansManyContexts.pdf
100.
Leach CL, Powell MB. Forensic Risk Assessment Interviews With Youth: How Do We Elicit the Most Reliable and Complete Information? Psychiatry, Psychology and Law. Published online 2020:1-13. doi:10.1080/13218719.2020.1734982
101.
Eastwood J, Snook B, Luther K. Establishing the Most Effective Way to Deliver the Sketch Procedure to Enhance Interviewee Free Recall. Psychology, Crime & Law. 2019;25(5):482-493. doi:10.1080/1068316X.2018.1538416
102.
Rachlew A. From Interrogating to Interviewing Suspects of Terror: Towards a New Mindset | Penal Reform International. Published 14 March 2017. https://www.penalreform.org/blog/interrogating-interviewing-suspects-terror-towards-new-mindset/
103.
We Are the ‘Exonerated 5.’ What Happened to Us Isn’t Past, It’s Present. The New York Times. Published online 2021. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/04/opinion/exonerated-five-false-confessions.html?smid=tw-share
