1.
Cino, J. G. Is a Polygraph a Reliable Lie Detector? The Conversation (2018).
2.
Gudjonsson, G. H. The Science-Based Pathways to Understanding False Confessions and Wrongful Convictions. Frontiers in Psychology 12, (2021).
3.
Hidden Victims:the Gendered Data Gap of Violent Crime | Watermark. https://watermark.silverchair.com/azaa100.pdf?token=AQECAHi208BE49Ooan9kkhW_Ercy7Dm3ZL_9Cf3qfKAc485ysgAAAtcwggLTBgkqhkiG9w0BBwagggLEMIICwAIBADCCArkGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAeBglghkgBZQMEAS4wEQQMqNSp0I_jMCxI4aGuAgEQgIICioHI0ftp6JxnahAjWTRT2-6wR8PcRLh12Yf26T2NlKvGNty30nA-o2QHUmMYgFjZH-M9GRzfB4UfuK9bP2a3geafD8XiwLL1Y6Y2rvPJIzGoWJpUfamGqq1largsllakGg1tBVeleTZKiz6F9ppv-dHYjf8cya0jdJxiBtX1ZL0TOvS2nLz3OQ-5niwxLh8lZ6O-XYfYZc1h4aefRi5rzui4nnm7YFr6E-XYvreNZxpffS0leJwOo227pfgvBozEiF1nQog2dujmWpj9UY2VvYv_fXXGIVvLpOwc0GCz77ORYQT9WmbvxlC3pnppXz4heRL2tOh8sdeWqVn6_k2J8pYh43rz_hBS4VJnosaV8_68Cx2d4PdTvUA7r7TVj0IyT62vNmTgBYk0g3AeMosqCBCKKPp2ES7Ml8udHPlkus2A_b8CHFyie4OGVdX7VebuTsWonGjoJziuES45aEGrfWVUMO_ATGsyCWfscUMbpGzGa6T_FYos-c2AL2WTvSXF6CZIeo7QDvUVeJ7kC5bG5knb7HFPal1bgiD20WGQ9jarHkUhvC-ZD9eSI0SDRsN7KEs67uCFHWJtFRfFuLqAuzB8HQxd3CYErjJY06N3FKS1ohhxI5B_Gp1L5WyWJe_D5Y1yeD-U1qG2SUq3bpOAymqQSZ5eLDRyfOcZfqOQZSzdj3PGVrw05jtHn-MttlJlqUxyqWirc3LGS9V-_zlLRa64CX4ckhtfBd_7rSxeK06A0UtAZM051RhEUwdZFiQIf50D1eT_6jfP6oZDVAiacRTIkrLg4_UijHZ5fNO5qeOcqpdNN9N9fE3ZqzdMtoHAupl25e59N2h1hskHRrNXhxoNojvnTlpQHbtM.
4.
Wells, G. L. Psychological Science on Eyewitness Identification and Its Impact on Police Practices and Policies. American Psychologist 75, 1316–1329 (2020).
5.
The Justice System Is Failing Victims and Survivors of Sexual Violence | The Psychologist. https://thepsychologist.bps.org.uk/justice-system-failing-victims-and-survivors-sexual-violence.
6.
Starr, D. The Interview | The New Yorker. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2013/12/09/the-interview-7 (2013).
7.
Schacter, D. L. Are All of Your Memories Real? | Ted Talk. https://www.ted.com/talks/daniel_l_schacter_are_all_of_your_memories_real?utm_source=twitter.com&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=tedspread.
8.
Flowe, H. D. Rethinking the Effects of Alcohol on Eyewitness Memory Accuracy: A Meta-Analysis of the Literature | Heather Flowe. https://www.heatherflowe.com/post/rethinking-the-effects-of-alcohol-on-eyewitness-memory-accuracy-a-meta-analysis-of-the-literature.
9.
Margot Van Sluytman Podcast: Sawbonna: Victims-Led Restorative Justice (Canada) | RJI. (2020).
10.
The Psychology of Fake News. (Routledge).
11.
Smith, J. The Junk Science Cops Use to Decide You’re Lying | The Intercept. https://theintercept.com/2020/08/12/blueleaks-law-enforcement-police-lie-detection/ (2020).
12.
Wager, N. Michael Jackson: As an Expert in Child Sexual Abuse Here’s What I Thought When I Watched Leaving Neverland. The Conversation (2019).
13.
Hester, M. & Lilley, S.-J. Rape Investigation and Attrition in Acquaintance, Domestic Violence and Historical Rape Cases. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling 14, 175–188 (2017).
14.
Lyon, T. D. Interviewing Children: Getting More with Less | YouTube.
15.
Yoffe, E. The Bad Science Behind Campus Response to Sexual Assault. The Atlantic (2007).
16.
Protecting Vulnerable Witnesses | Economic and Social Research Council. https://esrc.ukri.org/news-events-and-publications/impact-case-studies/protecting-vulnerable-witnesses/.
17.
Starr, D. This Psychologist Explains Why People Confess to Crimes They Didn’t Commit. Science (2019).
18.
Loftus, E. How Reliable Is Your Memory? | TED.
19.
Nash, R. Why You Should Doubt Your Memories |TEDxBrum | YouTube.
20.
Greenwood, V. How Science Is Putting a New Face on Crime Solving | National Geographic. http://www.nationalgeographic.com/magazine/2016/07/forensic-science-justice-crime-evidence/ (2016).
21.
Hyman, I. E., Wulff, A. N. & Thomas, A. K. Crime Blindness: How Selective Attention and Inattentional Blindness Can Disrupt Eyewitness Awareness and Memory. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5, 202–208 (2018).
22.
Rethinking the Effects of Alcohol on Eyewitness Memory Accuracy: A Meta-Analysis of the Literature | Heather D. Flowe. https://www.heatherflowe.com/post/rethinking-the-effects-of-alcohol-on-eyewitness-memory-accuracy-a-meta-analysis-of-the-literature.
23.
Loftus, E. F. 25 Years of Eyewitness Science……Finally Pays Off. Perspectives on Psychological Science 8, 556–557 (2013).
24.
Hope, L., Mullis, R. & Gabbert, F. Who? What? When? Using a Timeline Technique to Facilitate Recall of a Complex Event. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition 2, 20–24 (2013).
25.
Loftus, E. F. Eavesdropping on Memory. Annual Review of Psychology 68, 1–18 (2017).
26.
Flowe, H. D. et al. An Experimental Examination of the Effects of Alcohol Consumption and Exposure to Misleading Postevent Information on Remembering a Hypothetical Rape Scenario. Applied Cognitive Psychology 33, 393–413 (2019).
27.
Valentine, T. & Mesout, J. Eyewitness Identification Under Stress in the London Dungeon. Applied Cognitive Psychology 23, 151–161 (2009).
28.
Gabbert, F., Memon, A. & Allan, K. Memory Conformity: Can Eyewitnesses Influence Each Other’s Memories for an Event? Applied Cognitive Psychology 17, 533–543 (2003).
29.
Semmler, C., Dunn, J., Mickes, L. & Wixted, J. T. The Role of Estimator Variables in Eyewitness Identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 24, 400–415 (2018).
30.
Fitzgerald, R. J., Price, H. L. & Valentine, T. Eyewitness Identification: Live, Photo, and Video Lineups. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 24, 307–325 (2018).
31.
200 Exonerated: Too Many Wrongly Convicted.
32.
Brendan Dassey: A True Story of a False Confession | YouTube. (2016).
33.
Memon, A. Why Eyewitnesses Give False Evidence – and How We Can Stop Them. The Conversation (2016).
34.
Savage, S. P. & Milne, B. Miscarriages of Justice. in Handbook of Criminal Investigation 610–627 (Routledge, 2011).
35.
Finkelhor, D. Sexual Abuse. Journal of Psychotherapy & The Family 2, 53–65 (1986).
36.
Fleming, J., Mullen, P. & Bammer, G. A Study of Potential Risk Factors for Sexual Abuse in Childhood. Child Abuse & Neglect 21, 49–58 (1997).
37.
Horvath, M. A. H., Davidson, J. C., Grove-Hills, J., Gekoski, A. & Choak, C. "It’s a Lonely Journey”: A Rapid Evidence Assessment on Intrafamilial Child Sexual Abuse | Children’s Commissioner for England.
38.
Gregory, N. Offender Profiling: A Review of the Literature. The British Journal of Forensic Practice 7, 29–34 (2005).
39.
Davidson, J., Bogaerts, S., Caretti, V. & Scally, M. Enhancing Police and Industry Practice in the Prevention of Online Child Sexual Abuse. (2016) doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.26099.32807.
40.
DeMarco, J. N. et al. Digital Dangers and Cyber-Victimisation: A Study of European Adolescent Online Risky Behaviour for Sexual Exploitation. Clinical Neuropsychiatry 14, 104–112 (2017).
41.
Canter, D. V. Offender Profiling. in The Cambridge Handbook of Forensic Psychology 236–241 (Cambridge University Press, 2010).
42.
Cognitive and Human Factors in Expert Decision Making: Six Fallacies and the Eight Sources of Bias | Analytical Chemistry. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.analchem.0c00704.
43.
Dowden, C., Bennell, C. & Bloomfield, S. Advances in Offender Profiling: A Systematic Review of the Profiling Literature Published Over the Past Three Decades. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology 22, 44–56 (2007).
44.
Mokros, A. & Alison, L. J. Is Offender Profiling Possible? Testing the Predicted Homology of Crime Scene Actions and Background Characteristics in a Sample of Rapists. Legal and Criminological Psychology 7, 25–43 (2002).
45.
Torres, A. N., Boccaccini, M. T. & Miller, H. A. Perceptions of the Validity and Utility of Criminal Profiling Among Forensic Psychologists and Psychiatrists. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice 37, 51–58 (2006).
46.
Goodwill, A. M., Alison, L. J. & Beech, A. R. What Works in Offender Profiling? A Comparison of Typological, Thematic, and Multivariate Models. Behavioral Sciences & the Law 27, 507–529 (2009).
47.
Goodwill, A. M. & Alison, L. J. When Is Profiling Possible? Offense Planning and Aggression as Moderators in Predicting Offender Age From Victim Age in Stranger Rape. Behavioral Sciences & the Law 25, 823–840 (2007).
48.
Alison, L., Goodwill, A., Almond, L., Heuvel, C. & Winter, J. Pragmatic Solutions to Offender Profiling and Behavioural Investigative Advice. Legal and Criminological Psychology 15, 115–132 (2010).
49.
The Real Boon | The Psychologist. vol. 16 308–309 https://thepsychologist.bps.org.uk/volume-16/edition-6/real-boon (2003).
50.
Luke, T. J. Lessons From Pinocchio: Cues to Deception May Be Highly Exaggerated. Perspectives on Psychological Science 14, 646–671 (2019).
51.
Vrij, A. & Granhag, P. A. Eliciting Cues to Deception and Truth: What Matters Are the Questions Asked. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition 1, 110–117 (2012).
52.
Vrij, A., Fisher, R. P. & Blank, H. A Cognitive Approach to Lie Detection: A Meta-Analysis. Legal and Criminological Psychology 22, 1–21 (2017).
53.
Ten Brinke, L. & Porter, S. Cry Me a River: Identifying the Behavioral Consequences of Extremely High-Stakes Interpersonal Deception. Law and Human Behavior 36, 469–477 (2012).
54.
Levine, T. R., Serota, K. B. & Shulman, H. C. The Impact of Lie to Me on Viewers’ Actual Ability to Detect Deception. Communication Research 37, 847–856 (2010).
55.
Vrij, A. & Granhag, P. A. Eliciting Cues to Deception and Truth: What Matters Are the Questions Asked. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition 1, 110–117 (2012).
56.
Vrij, A. et al. Lying About Flying: The Efficacy of the Information Protocol and Model Statement for Detecting Deceit. Applied Cognitive Psychology 34, 241–255 (2020).
57.
Jordan, S. et al. A Test of the Micro‐expressions Training Tool: Does It Improve Lie Detection? Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling 16, 222–235 (2019).
58.
Hudson, C. A., Vrij, A., Akehurst, L. & Hope, L. The Devil Is in the Detail: Deception and Consistency Over Repeated Interviews. Psychology, Crime & Law 25, 752–770 (2019).
59.
Vrij, A., Fisher, R. P. & Blank, H. A Cognitive Approach to Lie Detection: A Meta-Analysis. Legal and Criminological Psychology 22, 1–21 (2017).
60.
Hester, M. & Lilley, S.-J. More Than Support to Court. International Review of Victimology 24, 313–328 (2018).
61.
van der Bruggen, M. & Grubb, A. A Review of the Literature Relating to Rape Victim Blaming: An Analysis of the Impact of Observer and Victim Characteristics on Attribution of Blame in Rape Cases. Aggression and Violent Behavior 19, 523–531 (2014).
62.
Shapland, J. et al. Situating Restorative Justice Within Criminal Justice. Theoretical Criminology 10, 505–532 (2006).
63.
Burman, M. Evidencing Sexual Assault: Women in the Witness Box. Probation Journal 56, 379–398 (2009).
64.
Lisak, D., Gardinier, L., Nicksa, S. C. & Cote, A. M. False Allegations of Sexual Assualt: An Analysis of Ten Years of Reported Cases. Violence Against Women 16, 1318–1334 (2010).
65.
Kelly, L., Lovett, J. & Regan, L. A Gap or a Chasm?: Attrition in Reported Rape Cases. vol. Home Office Research Study (Home Office Research, Development and Statistics Directorate, 2005).
66.
Hester, M. & Lilley, S.-J. Rape Investigation and Attrition in Acquaintance, Domestic Violence and Historical Rape Cases. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling 14, 175–188 (2017).
67.
Horvath, M. A. H., Tong, S. & Williams, E. Critical Issues in Rape Investigation: An Overview of Reform in England and Wales. Ehe Journal of Criminal Justice Research 1, 1–18 (2011).
68.
Daly, K. Conventional and Innovative Justice Responses to Sexual Violence. (2011).
69.
Hayes, R. M., Lorenz, K. & Bell, K. A. Victim Blaming Others. Feminist Criminology 8, 202–220 (2013).
70.
Sleath, E. & Bull, R. Police Perceptions of Rape Victims and the Impact on Case Decision Making: A Systematic Review. Aggression and Violent Behavior 34, 102–112 (2017).
71.
Strömwall, L. A., Landström, S. & Alfredsson, H. Perpetrator Characteristics and Blame Attributions in a Stranger Rape Situation. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context 6, 63–67 (2014).
72.
Dinisman, T. & Moroz, A. Understanding Victims of Crime: The Impact of the Crime and Support Needs. (2017).
73.
Borum, R. Radicalization into Violent Extremism I: A Review of Social Science Theories. Journal of Strategic Security 4, 7–36 (2011).
74.
King, M. & Taylor, D. M. The Radicalization of Homegrown Jihadists: A Review of Theoretical Models and Social Psychological Evidence. Terrorism and Political Violence 23, 602–622 (2011).
75.
Silke, A. The Internet & Terrorist Radicalisation: The Psychological Dimension. in Terrorism and the Internet: Threats - Target Groups - Deradicalisation Strategies -- Volume 67 NATO Science for Peace and Security Series - E: Human and Societal Dynamics 27–39 (2010).
76.
Kruglanski, A. W. et al. The Psychology of Radicalization and Deradicalization: How Significance Quest Impacts Violent Extremism. Political Psychology 35, (2014).
77.
Kruglanski, A. W., Jasko, K., Chernikova, M., Dugas, M. & Webber, D. To the Fringe and Back: Violent Extremism and the Psychology of Deviance. American Psychologist 72, 217–230 (2017).
78.
Webber, D., Klein, K., Kruglanski, A., Brizi, A. & Merari, A. Divergent Paths to Martyrdom and Significance Among Suicide Attackers. Terrorism and Political Violence 29, 852–874 (2017).
79.
Webber, D. et al. The Road to Extremism: Field and Experimental Evidence That Significance Loss-Induced Need for Closure Fosters Radicalization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 114, 270–285 (2018).
80.
Webber, D. et al. Deradicalizing Detained Terrorists. Political Psychology 39, 539–556 (2018).
81.
Scherr, K. C., Redlich, A. D. & Kassin, S. M. Cumulative Disadvantage: A Psychological Framework for Understanding How Innocence Can Lead to Confession, Wrongful Conviction, and Beyond. Perspectives on Psychological Science 15, 353–383 (2020).
82.
Vrij, A. et al. Psychological Perspectives on Interrogation. Perspectives on Psychological Science 12, 927–955 (2017).
83.
Kassin, S. M. On the Psychology of Confessions: Does Innocence Put Innocents at Risk? American Psychologist 60, 215–228 (2005).
84.
Nesterak, E. Coerced to Confess: The Psychology of False Confessions. Behavioural Scientist (2014).
85.
Kassin, S. M. The Social Psychology of False Confessions. Social Issues and Policy Review 9, 25–51 (2015).
86.
Meissner, C. A., Kelly, C. E. & Woestehoff, S. A. Improving the Effectiveness of Suspect Interrogations. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 11, 211–233 (2015).
87.
Hill, C., Memon, A. & McGeorge, P. The Role of Confirmation Bias in Suspect Interviews: A Systematic Evaluation. Legal and Criminological Psychology 13, 357–371 (2008).
88.
Maras, K. L., Mulcahy, S., Memon, A., Picariello, F. & Bowler, D. M. Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Self-Administered Interview for Witnesses with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Applied Cognitive Psychology 28, 693–701 (2014).
89.
Mattison, M. A. & Dando, C. J. Police Officers’ and Registered Intermediaries’ Use of Drawing During Investigative Interviews With Vulnerable Witnesses. Psychology, Crime and Law 26, 167–185 (2020).
90.
Special Measures | The Crown Prosecution Service. https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/special-measures.
91.
Risan, P., Milne, R. & Binder, P.-E. Trauma Narratives: Recommendations for Investigative Interviewing. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law 27, 678–694 (2020).
92.
Bull, R. The Investigative Interviewing of Children and Other Vulnerable Witnesses: Psychological Research and Working/professional Practice. Legal and Criminological Psychology 15, 5–23 (2010).
93.
Maras, K., Marshall, I. & Sands, C. Mock Juror Perceptions of Credibility and Culpability in an Autistic Defendant. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 49, 996–1010 (2019).
94.
La Rooy, D., Lamb, M. E. & Memon, A. Forensic Interviews with Children in Scotland: A Survey of Interview Practices Among Police. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology 26, 26–34 (2011).
95.
Baugerud, G., Johnson, M. S., Hansen, H. B. G., Magnussen, S. & Lamb, M. E. Forensic Interviews With Preschool Children: An Analysis of Extended Interviews in Norway (2015–2017). Applied Cognitive Psychology 34, 654–663 (2020).
96.
Memon, A., Meissner, C. A. & Fraser, J. The Cognitive Interview: A Meta-Analytic Review and Study Space Analysis of the Past 25 Years. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 16, 340–372 (2010).
97.
Review of the NICHD Protocol.
99.
Brubacher, S. P. & Powell, M. B. Best-Practice Interviewing Spans Many Contexts [open access]. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition 8, 398–402 (2019).
100.
Leach, C. L. & Powell, M. B. Forensic Risk Assessment Interviews With Youth: How Do We Elicit the Most Reliable and Complete Information? Psychiatry, Psychology and Law 1–13 (2020) doi:10.1080/13218719.2020.1734982.
101.
Eastwood, J., Snook, B. & Luther, K. Establishing the Most Effective Way to Deliver the Sketch Procedure to Enhance Interviewee Free Recall. Psychology, Crime & Law 25, 482–493 (2019).
102.
Rachlew, A. From Interrogating to Interviewing Suspects of Terror: Towards a New Mindset | Penal Reform International. https://www.penalreform.org/blog/interrogating-interviewing-suspects-terror-towards-new-mindset/ (2017).
103.
We Are the ‘Exonerated 5.’ What Happened to Us Isn’t Past, It’s Present. The New York Times (2021).
