1.
Spelke, E.S.: Nativism, Empiricism, and the Origins of Knowledge. Infant Behavior and Development. 21, 181–200 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0163-6383(98)90002-9.
2.
Haith, M.M.: Who Put the Cog in Infant Cognition? Is Rich Interpretation Too Costly? Infant Behavior and Development. 21, 167–179 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0163-6383(98)90001-7.
3.
Shinskey, J.L., Munakata, Y.: Detecting Transparent Barriers: Clear Evidence Against the Means-End Deficit Account of Search Failures. Infancy. 2, 395–404 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327078IN0203_7.
4.
Shinskey, J., Munakata, Y.: Are Infants in the Dark About Hidden Objects? Developmental Science. 6, 273–282 (2003).
5.
Shinskey, J.L.: The Sound of Darkness: Why Do Auditory Cues Aid Infants’ Search for Objects Hidden by Darkness but Not by Visible Occluders? Developmental Psychology. 44, 1715–1725 (2008).
6.
Shinskey, J.L., Munakata, Y.: Something Old, Something New: A Developmental Transition From Familiarity to Novelty Preferences With Hidden Objects. Developmental Science. 13, (2010). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00899.x.
7.
DeLoache, J.S.: Becoming Symbol-Minded. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 8, 66–70 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2003.12.004.
8.
Shinskey, J.L., Jachens, L.J.: Picturing Objects in Infancy. Child Development. 1813–1820 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12243.
9.
Strouse, G.A., Nyhout, A., Ganea, P.A.: The Role of Book Features in Young Children’s Transfer of Information from Picture Books to Real-World Contexts. Frontiers in Psychology. 9, (2018). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00050.
10.
Adi-Japha, E., Levin, I., Solomon, S.: Emergence of Representation in Drawing: The Relation Between Kinematic and Referential Aspects. Cognitive Development. 13, 25–51 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2014(98)90019-3.
11.
Silk, A.M.J., Thomas, G.V.: Development and Differentiation in Children’s Figure Drawings. British Journal of Psychology. 77, 399–410 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1986.tb02206.x.
12.
Karmiloff-Smith, A.: Constraints on Representational Change: Evidence From Children’s Drawing. Cognition. 34, 57–83 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(90)90031-E.
13.
Berti, A.E., Freeman, N.H.: Representational Change in Resources for Pictorial Innovation: A Three-Component Analysis. Cognitive Development. 12, 501–522 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2014(97)90020-4.
14.
Spensley, F., Taylor, J.: The Development of Cognitive Flexibility: Evidence From Children’s Drawings. Human Development. 42, 300–324 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1159/000022639.
15.
Morra, S.: Cognitive Aspects of Change in Drawings: A Neo-Piagetian Theoretical Account. British Journal of Developmental Psychology. 23, 317–341 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1348/026151005X27182.
16.
Werker, J.F., Hensch, T.K.: Critical Periods in Speech Perception: New Directions. Annual Review of Psychology. 66, 173–196 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015104.
17.
Danielson, D.K., Bruderer, A.G., Kandhadai, P., Vatikiotis-Bateson, E., Werker, J.F.: The Organization and Reorganization of Audiovisual Speech Perception in the First Year of Life. Cognitive Development. 42, 37–48 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2017.02.004.
18.
Saffran, J.R., Kirkham, N.Z.: Infant Statistical Learning. Annual Review of Psychology. 69, 181–203 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011805.
19.
Skeide, M.A., Friederici, A.D.: The Ontogeny of the Cortical Language Network. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 17, 323–332 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2016.23.
20.
Cristia, A., Seidl, A., Singh, L., Houston, D.: Test-Retest Reliability in Infant Speech Perception Tasks. Infancy. 21, 648–667 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1111/infa.12127.
21.
May, L., Byers-Heinlein, K., Gervain, J., Werker, J.F.: Language and the Newborn Brain: Does Prenatal Language Experience Shape the Neonate Neural Response to Speech? Frontiers in Psychology. 2, (2011). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00222.
22.
Vouloumanos, A., Werker, J.F.: Listening to Language at Birth: Evidence for a Bias for Speech in Neonates. Developmental Science. 10, 159–164 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00549.x.
23.
Danielson, D.K., Bruderer, A.G., Kandhadai, P., Vatikiotis-Bateson, E., Werker, J.F.: The Organization and Reorganization of Audiovisual Speech Perception in the First Year of Life. Cognitive Development. 42, 37–48 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2017.02.004.
24.
de Boysson-Bardies, B., Vihman, M.M.: Adaptation to Language: Evidence from Babbling and First Words in Four Languages. Language. 67, (1991). https://doi.org/10.2307/415108.
25.
Petitto, L., Marentette, P.: Babbling in the Manual Mode: Evidence for the Ontogeny of Language. Science. 251, 1493–1496 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2006424.
26.
Saffran, J.R., Aslin, R.N., Newport, E.L.: Statistical Learning by 8-Month-Old Infants. Science. 274, 1926–1928 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.274.5294.1926.
27.
Jusczyk, P.W., Friederici, A.D., Wessels, J.M.I., Svenkerud, V.Y., Jusczyk, A.M.: Infants′ Sensitivity to the Sound Patterns of Native Language Words. Journal of Memory and Language. 32, 402–420 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1993.1022.
28.
Werker, J.F., Tees, R.C.: Influences on Infant Speech Processing: Toward a New Synthesis. Annual Review of Psychology. 50, 509–535 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.509.
29.
Hayne, H.: Infant Memory Development: Implications for Childhood Amnesia. Developmental Review. 24, 33–73 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2003.09.007.
30.
Bauer, P.J.: A Complementary Processes Account of the Development of Childhood Amnesia and a Personal Past. Psychological Review. 122, 204–231 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038939.
31.
Tustin, K., Hayne, H.: Defining the Boundary: Age-Related Changes in Childhood Amnesia. Developmental Psychology. 46, 1049–1061 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020105.
32.
Spensley, F., Taylor, J.: The Development of Cognitive Flexibility: Evidence From Children’s Drawings. Human Development. 42, 300–324.
33.
Jack, F.: Maternal Reminiscing Style During Early Childhood Predicts the Age of Adolescents’ Earliest Memories.(Report). Child Development. 80, 496–505 (2009).
34.
Wang, Q.: Infantile Amnesia Reconsidered: A Cross-Cultural Analysis. Memory. 11, 65–80 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1080/741938173.
35.
Izard, V., Sann, C., Spelke, E.S., Streri, A.: Newborn Infants Perceive Abstract Numbers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 106, 10382–10385 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0812142106.
36.
Lyons, I.M., Bugden, S., Zheng, S., De Jesus, S., Ansari, D.: Symbolic Number Skills Predict Growth in Nonsymbolic Number Skills in Kindergarteners. Developmental Psychology. 54, 440–457 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000445.
37.
Siegler, R.S.: Magnitude Knowledge: The Common Core of Numerical Development. Developmental Science. 19, 341–361 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12395.
38.
Libertus, M.E., Feigenson, L., Halberda, J.: Preschool Acuity of the Approximate Number System Correlates With School Math Ability. Developmental Science. 14, 1292–1300 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01080.x.
39.
Goffin, C., Ansari, D.: How Are Symbols and Nonsymbolic Numerical Magnitudes Related? Exploring Bidirectional Relationships in Early Numeracy. Mind, Brain, and Education. 13, 143–156 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12206.
40.
Smith, P.: Play and the Beginning of Peer Relations. In: Slater, A. and Bremner, G. (eds.) An Introduction to Developmental Psychology. pp. 477–506. John Wiley & Sons (2017).
41.
Rubin, K.H., Watson, K.S., Jambor, T.W.: Free-Play Behaviors in Preschool and Kindergarten Children. Child Development. 49, (1978). https://doi.org/10.2307/1128725.
42.
Thompson, B.N., Goldstein, T.R.: Disentangling Pretend Play Measurement: Defining the Essential Elements and Developmental Progression of Pretense. Developmental Review. 52, 24–41 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2019.100867.
43.
Haight, W.L., Wang, X.-L.: Universal, Developmental, and Variable Aspects of Young Children’s Play: A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Pretending at Home. Child Development. 70, 1477–88 (1999).
44.
Bourchier, A., Davis, A.: Children’s Understanding of the Pretence-Reality Distinction: A Review of Current Theory and Evidence. Developmental Science. 5, 397–413 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7687.00236_1.
45.
Lillard, A.: Pretend Play as Twin Earth: A Social-Cognitive Analysis. Developmental Review. 21, 495–531 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1006/drev.2001.0532.
46.
Dore, R.A., Smith, E.D., Lillard, A.S.: How Is Theory of Mind Useful? Perhaps to Enable Social Pretend Play. Frontiers in Psychology. 6, (2015). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01559.
47.
Ahmed, S.P., Bittencourt-Hewitt, A., Sebastian, C.L.: Neurocognitive Bases of Emotion Regulation Development in Adolescence. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience. 15, 11–25 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2015.07.006.
48.
Blakemore, S.-J., Robbins, T.W.: Decision-Making in the Adolescent Brain. Nature Neuroscience. 15, 1184–1191 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3177.
49.
Blakemore, S.-J., Mills, K.L.: Is Adolescence a Sensitive Period for Sociocultural Processing? Annual Review of Psychology. 65, 187–207 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115202.
50.
Johnson, M.H., Griffin, R.: The Emergence of the Social Brain Network: Evidence From Typical and Atypical Development. Development and Psychopathology. 17, (2005). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579405050297.
51.
Paus, T., Keshavan, M., Giedd, J.N.: Why Do Many Psychiatric Disorders Emerge During Adolescence? Nature Reviews Neuroscience. (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2513.
52.
Cantlon, J.F., Pinel, P., Dehaene, S., Pelphrey, K.A.: Cortical Representations of Symbols, Objects, and Faces Are Pruned Back during Early Childhood. Cerebral Cortex. 21, 191–199 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhq078.
53.
Chein, J., Albert, D.: Peers Increase Adolescent Risk Taking by Enhancing Activity in the Brain’s Reward Circuitry. Developmental Science. 14, F1–F10 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.01035.x.
54.
Hare, T.A., Tottenham, N.: Biological Substrates of Emotional Reactivity and Regulation in Adolescence During an Emotional Go-Nogo Task. Biological Psychiatry. 63, 927–934 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.03.015.
55.
Sebastian, C., Viding, E., Williams, K.D., Blakemore, S.-J.: Social Brain Development and the Affective Consequences of Ostracism in Adolescence. Brain and Cognition. 72, 134–145 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2009.06.008.
56.
Shaw, P., Kabani, N.J.: Neurodevelopmental Trajectories of the Human Cerebral Cortex. Journal of Neuroscience. 28, 3586–3594 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5309-07.2008.
57.
Mischel, W., Ayduk, O., Berman, M.G., Casey, B.J., Gotlib, I.H., Jonides, J., Kross, E., Teslovich, T., Wilson, N.L., Zayas, V., Shoda, Y.: ‘Willpower’ Over the Life Span: Decomposing Self-Regulation. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience. 6, 252–256 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsq081.
58.
Anderson, P.: Assessment and Development of Executive Function (EF) During Childhood. Child Neuropsychology. 8, 71–82 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1076/chin.8.2.71.8724.
59.
Anderson, P.J., Reidy, N.: Assessing Executive Function in Preschoolers. Neuropsychology Review. 22, 345–360 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-012-9220-3.
60.
Bunge, S.A., Wright, S.B.: Neurodevelopmental Changes in Working Memory and Cognitive Control. Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 17, 243–250 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2007.02.005.
61.
Diamond, A., Lee, K.: Interventions Shown to Aid Executive Function Development in Children 4 to 12 Years Old. Science. 333, 959–964 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1204529.
62.
Melby-Lervåg, M., Hulme, C.: Is Working Memory Training Effective? a Meta-Analytic Review. Developmental Psychology. 49, 270–291 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028228.
63.
Watts, TW.., Duncan, G.J., Quan, H.: Revisiting the Marshmallow Test: A Conceptual Replication Investigating Links Between Early Delay of Gratification and Later Outcomes. (2018).
64.
Casey, B.J., Somerville, L.H.: Behavioral and Neural Correlates of Delay of Gratification 40 Years Later. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States. 108, (2011).
65.
Anderson, V.A., Anderson, P.: Development of Executive Functions Through Late Childhood and Adolescence in an Australian Sample. Developmental Neuropsychology. 20, 385–406 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326942DN2001_5.
66.
Kwon, H., Reiss, A.L., Menon, V.: Neural Basis of Protracted Developmental Changes in Visuo-Spatial Working Memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States. 99, (2002).
67.
Huizinga, M., Dolan, C.V., van der Molen, M.W.: Age-Related Change in Executive Function: Developmental Trends and a Latent Variable Analysis. Neuropsychologia. 44, 2017–2036 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.01.010.
68.
Moffitt, T.E., Arseneault, L.: A Gradient of Childhood Self-Control Predicts Health, Wealth, and Public Safety. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 108, 2693–2698 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1010076108.
69.
Kidd, C., Palmeri, H., Aslin, R.N.: Rational Snacking: Young Children’s Decision-Making on the Marshmallow Task Is Moderated by Beliefs About Environmental Reliability. Cognition. 126, 109–114 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.08.004.
70.
Carlson, S.M., Shoda, Y., Ayduk, O., Aber, L., Schaefer, C., Sethi, A., Wilson, N., Peake, P.K., Mischel, W.: Cohort Effects in Children’s Delay of Gratification. Developmental Psychology. 54, 1395–1407 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000533.
71.
Lamm, B., Keller, H., Teiser, J., Gudi, H., Yovsi, R.D., Freitag, C., Poloczek, S., Fassbender, I., Suhrke, J., Teubert, M., Vöhringer, I., Knopf, M., Schwarzer, G., Lohaus, A.: Waiting for the Second Treat: Developing Culture-Specific Modes of Self-Regulation. Child Development. 89, e261–e277 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12847.
