1.
Spelke ES. Nativism, Empiricism, and the Origins of Knowledge. Infant Behavior and Development. 1998;21(2):181–200.
2.
Haith MM. Who Put the Cog in Infant Cognition? Is Rich Interpretation Too Costly? Infant Behavior and Development. 1998;21(2):167–179.
3.
Shinskey JL, Munakata Y. Detecting Transparent Barriers: Clear Evidence Against the Means-End Deficit Account of Search Failures. Infancy. 2001;2(3):395–404.
4.
Shinskey J, Munakata Y. Are Infants in the Dark About Hidden Objects? Developmental Science [Internet]. 2003;6(3):273–282. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-7687.00283/abstract
5.
Shinskey JL. The Sound of Darkness: Why Do Auditory Cues Aid Infants’ Search for Objects Hidden by Darkness but Not by Visible Occluders? Developmental Psychology [Internet]. 2008;44(6):1715–1725. Available from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=pdh&AN=2008-16008-015&site=ehost-live
6.
Shinskey JL, Munakata Y. Something Old, Something New: A Developmental Transition From Familiarity to Novelty Preferences With Hidden Objects. Developmental Science. 2010;13(2).
7.
DeLoache JS. Becoming Symbol-Minded. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2004;8(2):66–70.
8.
Shinskey JL, Jachens LJ. Picturing Objects in Infancy. Child Development. 2014;1813–1820.
9.
Strouse GA, Nyhout A, Ganea PA. The Role of Book Features in Young Children’s Transfer of Information from Picture Books to Real-World Contexts. Frontiers in Psychology. 2018;9.
10.
Adi-Japha E, Levin I, Solomon S. Emergence of Representation in Drawing: The Relation Between Kinematic and Referential Aspects. Cognitive Development. 1998;13(1):25–51.
11.
Silk AMJ, Thomas GV. Development and Differentiation in Children’s Figure Drawings. British Journal of Psychology. 1986;77(3):399–410.
12.
Karmiloff-Smith A. Constraints on Representational Change: Evidence From Children’s Drawing. Cognition. 1990;34(1):57–83.
13.
Berti AE, Freeman NH. Representational Change in Resources for Pictorial Innovation: A Three-Component Analysis. Cognitive Development. 1997;12(4):501–522.
14.
Spensley F, Taylor J. The Development of Cognitive Flexibility: Evidence From Children’s Drawings. Human Development [Internet]. 1999;42(6):300–324. Available from: https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/docview/224018166?OpenUrlRefId=info:xri/sid:primo&accountid=11455
15.
Morra S. Cognitive Aspects of Change in Drawings: A Neo-Piagetian Theoretical Account. British Journal of Developmental Psychology. 2005;23(3):317–341.
16.
Werker JF, Hensch TK. Critical Periods in Speech Perception: New Directions. Annual Review of Psychology. 2015;66(1):173–196.
17.
Danielson DK, Bruderer AG, Kandhadai P, Vatikiotis-Bateson E, Werker JF. The Organization and Reorganization of Audiovisual Speech Perception in the First Year of Life. Cognitive Development. 2017;42:37–48.
18.
Saffran JR, Kirkham NZ. Infant Statistical Learning. Annual Review of Psychology. 2018;69(1):181–203.
19.
Skeide MA, Friederici AD. The Ontogeny of the Cortical Language Network. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2016;17(5):323–332.
20.
Cristia A, Seidl A, Singh L, Houston D. Test-Retest Reliability in Infant Speech Perception Tasks. Infancy. 2016;21(5):648–667.
21.
May L, Byers-Heinlein K, Gervain J, Werker JF. Language and the Newborn Brain: Does Prenatal Language Experience Shape the Neonate Neural Response to Speech? Frontiers in Psychology. 2011;2.
22.
Vouloumanos A, Werker JF. Listening to Language at Birth: Evidence for a Bias for Speech in Neonates. Developmental Science. 2007;10(2):159–164.
23.
Danielson DK, Bruderer AG, Kandhadai P, Vatikiotis-Bateson E, Werker JF. The Organization and Reorganization of Audiovisual Speech Perception in the First Year of Life. Cognitive Development. 2017;42:37–48.
24.
de Boysson-Bardies B, Vihman MM. Adaptation to Language: Evidence from Babbling and First Words in Four Languages. Language. 1991;67(2).
25.
Petitto L, Marentette P. Babbling in the Manual Mode: Evidence for the Ontogeny of Language. Science [Internet]. 1991;251(5000):1493–1496. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2875832
26.
Saffran JR, Aslin RN, Newport EL. Statistical Learning by 8-Month-Old Infants. Science [Internet]. 1996;274(5294):1926–1928. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2891705
27.
Jusczyk PW, Friederici AD, Wessels JMI, Svenkerud VY, Jusczyk AM. Infants′ Sensitivity to the Sound Patterns of Native Language Words. Journal of Memory and Language. 1993;32(3):402–420.
28.
Werker JF, Tees RC. Influences on Infant Speech Processing: Toward a New Synthesis. Annual Review of Psychology. 1999;50(1):509–535.
29.
Hayne H. Infant Memory Development: Implications for Childhood Amnesia. Developmental Review. 2004;24(1):33–73.
30.
Bauer PJ. A Complementary Processes Account of the Development of Childhood Amnesia and a Personal Past. Psychological Review [Internet]. 2015;122(2):204–231. Available from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=pdh&AN=2015-14440-002&site=ehost-live
31.
Tustin K, Hayne H. Defining the Boundary: Age-Related Changes in Childhood Amnesia. Developmental Psychology. 2010 Sep;46(5):1049–1061.
32.
Spensley F, Taylor J. The Development of Cognitive Flexibility: Evidence From Children’s Drawings. Human Development [Internet]. 42(6):300–324. Available from: https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/docview/224018166?OpenUrlRefId=info:xri/sid:primo&accountid=11455
33.
Jack F. Maternal Reminiscing Style During Early Childhood Predicts the Age of Adolescents’ Earliest Memories.(Report). Child Development [Internet]. 2009;80(2):496–505. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/29738629
34.
Wang Q. Infantile Amnesia Reconsidered: A Cross-Cultural Analysis. Memory. 2003;11(1):65–80.
35.
Izard V, Sann C, Spelke ES, Streri A. Newborn Infants Perceive Abstract Numbers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2009;106(25):10382–10385.
36.
Lyons IM, Bugden S, Zheng S, De Jesus S, Ansari D. Symbolic Number Skills Predict Growth in Nonsymbolic Number Skills in Kindergarteners. Developmental Psychology. 2018;54(3):440–457.
37.
Siegler RS. Magnitude Knowledge: The Common Core of Numerical Development. Developmental Science. 2016;19(3):341–361.
38.
Libertus ME, Feigenson L, Halberda J. Preschool Acuity of the Approximate Number System Correlates With School Math Ability. Developmental Science. 2011;14(6):1292–1300.
39.
Goffin C, Ansari D. How Are Symbols and Nonsymbolic Numerical Magnitudes Related? Exploring Bidirectional Relationships in Early Numeracy. Mind, Brain, and Education. 2019;13(3):143–156.
40.
Smith P. Play and the Beginning of Peer Relations. In: Slater A, Bremner G, editors. An Introduction to Developmental Psychology. 3rd ed. John Wiley & Sons; 2017. p. 477–506.
41.
Rubin KH, Watson KS, Jambor TW. Free-Play Behaviors in Preschool and Kindergarten Children. Child Development. 1978;49(2).
42.
Thompson BN, Goldstein TR. Disentangling Pretend Play Measurement: Defining the Essential Elements and Developmental Progression of Pretense. Developmental Review. 2019;52:24–41.
43.
Haight WL, Wang XL. Universal, Developmental, and Variable Aspects of Young Children’s Play: A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Pretending at Home. Child Development [Internet]. 1999;70(6):1477–88. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1132319
44.
Bourchier A, Davis A. Children’s Understanding of the Pretence-Reality Distinction: A Review of Current Theory and Evidence. Developmental Science. 2002;5(4):397–413.
45.
Lillard A. Pretend Play as Twin Earth: A Social-Cognitive Analysis. Developmental Review. 2001;21(4):495–531.
46.
Dore RA, Smith ED, Lillard AS. How Is Theory of Mind Useful? Perhaps to Enable Social Pretend Play. Frontiers in Psychology. 2015;6.
47.
Ahmed SP, Bittencourt-Hewitt A, Sebastian CL. Neurocognitive Bases of Emotion Regulation Development in Adolescence. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience. 2015;15:11–25.
48.
Blakemore SJ, Robbins TW. Decision-Making in the Adolescent Brain. Nature Neuroscience. 2012;15(9):1184–1191.
49.
Blakemore SJ, Mills KL. Is Adolescence a Sensitive Period for Sociocultural Processing? Annual Review of Psychology. 2014;65(1):187–207.
50.
Johnson MH, Griffin R. The Emergence of the Social Brain Network: Evidence From Typical and Atypical Development. Development and Psychopathology. 2005;17(03).
51.
Paus T, Keshavan M, Giedd JN. Why Do Many Psychiatric Disorders Emerge During Adolescence? Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2010;
52.
Cantlon JF, Pinel P, Dehaene S, Pelphrey KA. Cortical Representations of Symbols, Objects, and Faces Are Pruned Back during Early Childhood. Cerebral Cortex. 2011;21(1):191–199.
53.
Chein J, Albert D. Peers Increase Adolescent Risk Taking by Enhancing Activity in the Brain’s Reward Circuitry. Developmental Science. 2011;14(2):F1–F10.
54.
Hare TA, Tottenham N. Biological Substrates of Emotional Reactivity and Regulation in Adolescence During an Emotional Go-Nogo Task. Biological Psychiatry. 2008;63(10):927–934.
55.
Sebastian C, Viding E, Williams KD, Blakemore SJ. Social Brain Development and the Affective Consequences of Ostracism in Adolescence. Brain and Cognition. 2010;72(1):134–145.
56.
Shaw P, Kabani NJ. Neurodevelopmental Trajectories of the Human Cerebral Cortex. Journal of Neuroscience. 2008;28(14):3586–3594.
57.
Mischel W, Ayduk O, Berman MG, Casey BJ, Gotlib IH, Jonides J, Kross E, Teslovich T, Wilson NL, Zayas V, Shoda Y. ‘Willpower’ Over the Life Span: Decomposing Self-Regulation. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience. 2011;6(2):252–256.
58.
Anderson P. Assessment and Development of Executive Function (EF) During Childhood. Child Neuropsychology. 2002;8(2):71–82.
59.
Anderson PJ, Reidy N. Assessing Executive Function in Preschoolers. Neuropsychology Review. 2012;22(4):345–360.
60.
Bunge SA, Wright SB. Neurodevelopmental Changes in Working Memory and Cognitive Control. Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 2007;17(2):243–250.
61.
Diamond A, Lee K. Interventions Shown to Aid Executive Function Development in Children 4 to 12 Years Old. Science. 2011;333(6045):959–964.
62.
Melby-Lervåg M, Hulme C. Is Working Memory Training Effective? a Meta-Analytic Review. Developmental Psychology [Internet]. 2013;49(2):270–291. Available from: http://web.a.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail/detail?vid=1&sid=c6b2f891-e842-42ab-9f25-4e895af7f4ac%40sessionmgr4006&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=2012-12954-001&db=pdh
63.
Watts TW., Duncan GJ, Quan H. Revisiting the Marshmallow Test: A Conceptual Replication Investigating Links Between Early Delay of Gratification and Later Outcomes. 2018; Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0956797618761661
64.
Casey BJ, Somerville LH. Behavioral and Neural Correlates of Delay of Gratification 40 Years Later. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States [Internet]. 2011;108(36). Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/27979415?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
65.
Anderson VA, Anderson P. Development of Executive Functions Through Late Childhood and Adolescence in an Australian Sample. Developmental Neuropsychology. 2001;20(1):385–406.
66.
Kwon H, Reiss AL, Menon V. Neural Basis of Protracted Developmental Changes in Visuo-Spatial Working Memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States [Internet]. 2002;99(20). Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3073397?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
67.
Huizinga M, Dolan CV, van der Molen MW. Age-Related Change in Executive Function: Developmental Trends and a Latent Variable Analysis. Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(11):2017–2036.
68.
Moffitt TE, Arseneault L. A Gradient of Childhood Self-Control Predicts Health, Wealth, and Public Safety. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2011;108(7):2693–2698.
69.
Kidd C, Palmeri H, Aslin RN. Rational Snacking: Young Children’s Decision-Making on the Marshmallow Task Is Moderated by Beliefs About Environmental Reliability. Cognition. 2013;126(1):109–114.
70.
Carlson SM, Shoda Y, Ayduk O, Aber L, Schaefer C, Sethi A, Wilson N, Peake PK, Mischel W. Cohort Effects in Children’s Delay of Gratification. Developmental Psychology [Internet]. 2018;54(8):1395–1407. Available from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=pdh&AN=2018-29923-001&site=ehost-live
71.
Lamm B, Keller H, Teiser J, Gudi H, Yovsi RD, Freitag C, Poloczek S, Fassbender I, Suhrke J, Teubert M, Vöhringer I, Knopf M, Schwarzer G, Lohaus A. Waiting for the Second Treat: Developing Culture-Specific Modes of Self-Regulation. Child Development. 2018;89(3):e261–e277.
