[1]
G. Ryle, ‘Knowing How and Knowing That: The Presidential Address’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, vol. 46, 1946 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/4544405?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
[2]
J. Stanley and T. Willlamson, ‘Knowing How’, Journal of Philosophy, vol. 98, no. 8, pp. 411–444, 2001, doi: 10.2307/2678403.
[3]
G. Ryle, ‘Descartes’ Myth’, in The Concept of Mind, London: Penguin, 2000.
[4]
G. Ryle, ‘Knowing How and Knowing That’, in The Concept of Mind, London: Penguin, 2000.
[5]
A. Noë, ‘Against Intellectualism’, Analysis, vol. 65, no. 4, 2005 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3329081?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
[6]
S. A. Kripke, Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language: An Elementary Exposition. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1982.
[7]
S. A. Kripke, Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language: An Elementary Exposition. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub, 1982 [Online]. Available: http://lib.myilibrary.com?id=174146
[8]
J. McDowell, ‘Wittgenstein on Following a Rule’, Synthese, vol. 58, no. 3, 1984 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/20115972?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
[9]
A. Miller, ‘Rule-Following and Externalism’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, vol. 68, no. 1, 2004 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/40040662?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
[10]
J. R. Searle, ‘Introduction’, in The Construction of Social Reality, London: Penguin, 1996.
[11]
J. R. Searle, ‘The Building Blocks of Social Reality’, in The Construction of Social Reality, London: Penguin, 1996.
[12]
J. R. Searle, ‘Background Abilities and the Explanation of Social Phenomena’, in The Construction of Social Reality, London: Penguin, 1996.
[13]
N. Gascoigne and T. Thornton, ‘Being in the Background’, in Tacit Knowledge, Durham: Acumen, 2013.
[14]
N. Gascoigne and T. Thornton, ‘Being in the Background’, in Tacit Knowledge, Durham: Acumen, 2013 [Online]. Available: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=3061118
[15]
M. Merleau-Ponty and D. A. Landes, Phenomenology of Perception. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2014.
[16]
M. Merleau-Ponty and D. A. Landes, Phenomenology of Perception. London: Routledge, 2012 [Online]. Available: http://ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780203720714
[17]
S. D. Kelly, ‘Merleau-Ponty on the Body’, Ratio, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 376–391, 2002, doi: 10.1111/1467-9329.00198.
[18]
S. D. Kelly, ‘Grasping at Straws: Motor Intentionality and the Cognitive Science of Skilled Behaviour’, in Heidegger, Coping, and Cognitive Science, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2000.
[19]
H. L. Dreyfus, ‘Overcoming the Myth of the Mental: How Philosophers Can Profit From the Phenomenology of Everyday Expertise’, Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, vol. 79, no. 2, 2005 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/30046213?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
[20]
J. Mcdowell, ‘What Myth?’, Inquiry, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 338–351, 2007, doi: 10.1080/00201740701489211.
[21]
H. L. Dreyfus, ‘The Return of the Myth of the Mental’, Inquiry, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 352–365, 2007, doi: 10.1080/00201740701489245.
[22]
J. McDowell, ‘Response to Dreyfus’, Inquiry, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 366–370, 2007, doi: 10.1080/00201740701489351.
[23]
H. L. Dreyfus, ‘Response to McDowell’, Inquiry, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 371–377, 2007, doi: 10.1080/00201740701489401.
[24]
J. K. Schear, Mind, Reason and Being-in-the-World: The McDowell-Dreyfus Debate. London: Routledge, 2013.
[25]
J. K. Schear, Mind, Reason and Being-in-the-World: The McDowell-Dreyfus Debate. London: Routledge, 2013 [Online]. Available: http://ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780203076316
[26]
A. Camus, ‘An Absurd Reasoning’, in The Myth of Sisyphus, vol. 39, London: Penguin Books, 2005.
[27]
J. Foley and Foley John Staff, Albert Camus: from the absurd to revolt. Stocksfield [U.K.]: Acumen, 2008.
[28]
T. Hanna, The Thought and Art of Albert Camus. Chicago: Regnery, 1958.
[29]
E. J. Hughes, The Cambridge Companion to Camus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
[30]
E. J. Hughes, The Cambridge Companion to Camus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007 [Online]. Available: http://ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521840481
[31]
J. McBride, Albert Camus. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1992.
[32]
P. McCarthy, Camus. New York: Random House, 1982.
[33]
A. Sagi, Albert Camus and the Philosophy of the Absurd. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2002.
[34]
D. Sprintzen, Camus. Temple University Press, 1991.
[35]
R. Srigley, Albert Camus Critique of Modernity. University of Missouri Press, 2011.
[36]
A. Camus, ‘The Absurd Man’, in The Myth of Sisyphus, vol. 39, London: Penguin Books, 2005.
[37]
A. Camus, ‘Absurd Creation’, in The Myth of Sisyphus, vol. 39, London: Penguin Books, 2005.
[38]
A. Camus, ‘The Myth of Sisyphus’, in The Myth of Sisyphus, vol. 39, London: Penguin Books, 2005.
[39]
S. de Beauvoir, ‘Ambiguity and Freedom’, in The Ethics of Ambiguity, New York: Philosophical Library, 2015.
[40]
S. de Beauvoir, ‘Personal Freedom and Others’, in The Ethics of Ambiguity, New York: Philosophical Library, 2015.
[41]
J.-P. Sartre, Being and Nothingness: An Essay on Phenomenological Ontology. London: Routledge, 2003.
[42]
J.-P. Sartre, Being and Nothingness: An Essay on Phenomenological Ontology. London: Routledge, 2003.
[43]
J.-P. Sartre, Being and Nothingness: An Essay on Phenomenological Ontology. London: Routledge, 2003 [Online]. Available: http://ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780203827123
[44]
C. Card, The Cambridge Companion to Simone de Beauvoir. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003 [Online]. Available: http://ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521790964
[45]
P. Deutscher, The Philosophy of Simone De Beauvoir: Ambiguity, Conversion, Resistance, vol. 91. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Holloway&isbn=9780511422102&uid=^u
[46]
S. Kruks, Simone De Beauvoir and the Politics of Ambiguity. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2012.
[47]
M. Langer, ‘A Philosophical Retrieval of Simone De Beauvoir’s Pour Une Morale De L’amiguité’, Philosophy Today, vol. 38, pp. 286–309, 1994 [Online]. Available: https://search.proquest.com/docview/1301481211?rfr_id=info%3Axri%2Fsid%3Aprimo
[48]
S. de Beauvoir, ‘The Positive Aspect of Ambiguity’, in The Ethics of Ambiguity, New York: Philosophical Library, 2015.
[49]
H. Arendt, ‘Thinking and Moral Considerations: A Lecture’, Social Research, vol. 38, no. 3, 1971 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/40970069?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
[50]
L. Bradshaw, Acting and Thinking: The Political Thought of Hannah Arendt. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1989.
[51]
C. J. Calhoun and J. P. McGowan, Hannah Arendt and the Meaning of Politics, vol. v. 6. Minneapolis, Minn: University of Minnesota Press, 1997.
[52]
M. Canovan, The Political Thought of Hannah Arendt. London: Dent, 1974.
[53]
M. Canovan, Hannah Arendt: A Reinterpretation of Her Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
[54]
M. Canovan, Hannah Arendt: A Reinterpretation of Her Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511521300
[55]
L. J. Disch, Hannah Arendt and the Limits of Philosophy: With a New Preface. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1996.
[56]
J. McGowan, Hannah Arendt: An Introduction. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1998.
[57]
J. McGowan, Hannah Arendt: An Introduction. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1998 [Online]. Available: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=310414
[58]
B. C. Parekh, Hannah Arendt and the Search for a New Political Philosophy. [Basingstoke, Hampshire]: [Palgrave Macmillan], 2014.
[59]
J. Lacan and A. Sheridan, ‘The Mirror Stage as Formative of the Function of the I’, in Écrits: A Selection, London: Routledge, 1977.
[60]
J. Lacan and A. Sheridan, ‘The Signification of the Phallus’, in Écrits: A Selection, London: Routledge, 1977.
[61]
J. Lacan and A. Sheridan, ‘The Subversion of the Subject and the Dialectic of Desire in the Freudian Unconscious.’, in Écrits: A Selection, London: Routledge, 1977.
[62]
J. Mitchell and J. Rose, ‘God and the Jouissance of the Woman; A Love Letter’, in Feminine Sexuality: Jacques Lacan and the Ecole Freudienne, J. Mitchell and J. Rose, Eds. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 1982.
[63]
L. Ingaray, ‘Cosi Fan Tuti’, in This Sex Which Is Not One, Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1985.
[64]
R. Boothby, Death and Desire: Psychoanalytic Theory in Lacan’s Return to Freud. New York: Routledge, 1991.
[65]
T. Brennan, ‘An Impasse in Psychoanalysis and Feminism’, in A Reader in Feminist Knowledge, London: Routledge, 1991.
[66]
T. Brennan, Between Feminism and Psychoanalysis. London: Routledge, 1989.
[67]
T. Brennan, Between Feminism and Psychoanalysis. London: Routledge, 1989 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=169486
[68]
C. Burke, N. Schor, and M. Whitford, Engaging with Irigaray: Feminist Philosophy and Modern European Thought. New York: Columbia University Press, 1994.
[69]
T. Chanter, Ethics of Eros: Irigaray’s Re-Writing of the Philosophers. New York: Routledge, 1995.
[70]
E. A. Grosz, Sexual Subversions:  Three French Feminists. Sydney: Allen & Unwin, 1989.
[71]
E. A. Grosz, Jacques Lacan: A Feminist Introduction. London: Routledge, 1990.
[72]
T. Lorraine, Irigaray and Deleuze: Experiments in Visceral Thought. Cornell University Press, 1999.
[73]
J. Mitchell and J. Rose, Eds., Feminine Sexuality: Jacques Lacan and the Ecole Freudienne. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 1985.
[74]
T. Moi, French Feminist Thought: A Reader. Oxford: Blackwell, 1987.
[75]
E. Pluth, ‘Lacan’s Subversion of the Subject’, Continental Philosophy Review, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 293–312, 2007, doi: 10.1007/s11007-006-9024-3.
[76]
J. Rose, ‘Femininity and its Discontents’, in Sexuality: A Reader, London: Virago, 1987.
[77]
Y. Stavrakakis, Lacan and the Political. London: Routledge, 1999.
[78]
M. Whitford, Luce Irigaray: Philosophy in the Feminine. London: Routledge, 1991.
[79]
N. Widder, ‘Two Routes from Hegel’, in The Onlife Manifesto: Being Human in a Hyperconnected Era, L. Floridi, Ed. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2015.
[80]
N. Widder, Reflections on Time and Politics. University Park, Pa: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2008.
[81]
C. Williams, ‘Feminism, Subjectivity and Psychoanalysis:  Towards a (Corpo)real Knowledge’, in Knowing the Difference: Feminist Perspectives in Epistemology, London: Routledge, 1994.
[82]
E. Wilson, ‘Psychoanalysis:  Psychic Law and Order’, in Sexuality: A Reader, London: Virago, 1987.
[83]
S. Zizek, The Sublime Object of Ideology. London: Verso, 1989.
[84]
S. Zizek, How to Read Lacan. London: Granta Books, 2006.
[85]
G. Deleuze, F. Guattari, R. Hurley, M. Seem, and H. R. Lane, Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. New York, New York: Penguin Books, 2009.
[86]
G. Deleuze and F. Guattari, Anti-Oedipus: capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1983.
[87]
G. Deleuze and F. Guattari, ‘Year Zero: Faciality’, in A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, London: Continuum, 2004.
[88]
G. Deleuze and F. Guattari, ‘November 28, 1947: How Do You Make Yourself a Body Without Organs?’, in A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, London: Continuum, 2004.
[89]
F. Abou-Rihan, Deleuze and Guattari: A Psychoanalytic Itinerary. London: Continuum, 2008.
[90]
H. Somers-Hall, J. A. Bell, and J. Williams, Eds., A Thousand Plateaus and Philosophy. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2018.
[91]
R. Bogue, Deleuze and Guattari. London: Routledge, 1989.
[92]
L. De Bolle, Deleuze and Psychoanalysis: Philosophical Essays on Deleuze’s Debate With Psychoanalysis, vol. 9. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 2010 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=1762959
[93]
I. Buchanan, Deleuzism: A Metacommentary. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2000.
[94]
I. Buchanan, Deleuze and Guattari’s Anti-Oedipus: A Reader’s Guide. London: Continuum, 2008.
[95]
P. Goodchild, Deleuze and Guattari: The Politics of Desire. London: Sage, 1996.
[96]
E. W. Holland, Deleuze and Guattari’s Anti-Oedipus: Introduction to Schizoanalysis. London: Routledge, 1999.
[97]
E. W. Holland, Deleuze and Guattari’s Anti-Oedipus: Introduction to Schizoanalysis. London: Routledge, 1999 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=165128
[98]
E. W. Holland, Deleuze and Guattari’s A thousand plateaus: a reader’s guide. London: Bloomsbury, 2013.
[99]
E. Kaufman and K. J. Heller, Deleuze and Guattari: New Mappings in Politics, Philosophy and Culture. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press, 1998.
[100]
G. Lambert, The Non-Philosophy of Gilles Deleuze. New York: Continuum, 2002.
[101]
B. Massumi, A User’s Guide to Capitalism and Schizophrenia: Deviations From Deleuze and Guattari. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 1992.
[102]
A. Parr, The Deleuze Dictionary. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2005.
[103]
P. Patton, Deleuze: A Critical Reader. .
[104]
P. Patton, Deleuze and the Political. London: Routledge, 2000.
[105]
A. Schuster, The Trouble with Pleasure. The MIT Press, 2016.
[106]
C. J. Stivale, The Two-Fold Thought of Deleuze and Guattari: Intersections and Animations. New York: Guilford Press, 1998.
[107]
C. J. Stivale, Gilles Deleuze: Key Concepts. Chesham: Acumen, 2005.
[108]
N. Widder, Political Theory After Deleuze. New York: Continuum, 2012.
[109]
N. Widder, Political Theory After Deleuze. London: Continuum, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=918769
[110]
J. Rawls, ‘Justice as Fairness: Political not Metaphysical’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 14, no. 3, 1985 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2265349?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
[111]
L. Finlayson, ‘Beware! Beware! The Forest of Sin!: Reluctant Reflections on Rawls’, in The Political Is Political: Conformity and the Illusion of Dissent in Contemporary Political Philosophy, London: Rowman & Littlefield International, 2015.
[112]
J. Gray, ‘Modus Vivendi’, in Two Faces of Liberalism, New York: New Press, 2000.
[113]
B. Williams, ‘Realism and Moralism in Political Theory’, in In the Beginning Was the Deed: Realism and Moralism in Political Argument, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2008.
[114]
R. Guess, ‘Part I: Realism’, in Philosophy and Real Politics, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2008.
[115]
J. Gledhill, ‘Rawls and Realism’, Social Theory and Practice, vol. 38, no. 1, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/23562155?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
[116]
D. Enoch, ‘Against Public Reason’, in Oxford Studies in Political Philosophy: Volume 1, D. Sobel, P. Vallentyne, and S. Wall, Eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.
[117]
D. Estlund and G. F. Gaus, ‘Justificatory Liberalism: An Essay on Epistemology and Political Theory’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, vol. 59, no. 3, 1999, doi: 10.2307/2653803.
[118]
F. Freyenhagen, ‘Taking Reasonable Pluralism Seriously: An Internal Critique of Political Liberalism’, Politics, Philosophy & Economics, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 323–342, 2011, doi: 10.1177/1470594X10388381.
[119]
G. F. Gaus, ‘The Rational, the Reasonable and Justification’, Journal of Political Philosophy, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 234–258, 1995.
[120]
G. F. Gaus, ‘Reasonable Pluralism and the Domain of the Political: How the Weaknesses of John Rawls’s Political Liberalism Can Be Overcome by a Justificatory Liberalism’, Inquiry, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 259–284, 1999, doi: 10.1080/002017499321570.
[121]
S. Wall, ‘Is Public Justification Self-Defeating?’, American Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 39, no. 4, 2002 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/20010087?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
[122]
P. J. Weithman, Why Political Liberalism?: On John Rawls’s Political Turn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
[123]
P. J. Weithman, Why Political Liberalism?: On John Rawls’s Political Turn. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=3054013
[124]
T. M. Scalon, ‘Rawls on Justification’, in The Cambridge Companion to Rawls, Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
[125]
J. Horton, ‘Realism, Liberal Moralism and a Political Theory of Modus Vivendi’, European Journal of Political Theory, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 431–448, 2010, doi: 10.1177/1474885110374004.
[126]
N. Rutherford, ‘Instability and Modus Vivendi’, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, pp. 1–22, 2018, doi: 10.1080/13698230.2018.1525119.
[127]
The Political Theory of Modus Vivendi, 1st ed. 2019. Springer International Publishing AG, 2018.
[128]
D. McCabe, Modus vivendi liberalism: theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
[129]
M. Bacon, ‘Breaking Up Is Hard to Do: John Gray’s Complicated Relationship With the Liberal Project’, Social Theory and Practice, vol. 36, no. 3, 2010 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/23562129?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
[130]
M. Sleat, Liberal Realism: A Realist Theory of Liberal Politics. Manchester Univ Pr, 2013.
[131]
M. Philp, ‘Realism Without Illusions’, Political Theory, vol. 40, no. 5, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/41703089?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
[132]
D. Runciman, ‘What Is Realistic Political Philosophy?’, Metaphilosophy, vol. 43, no. 1, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/24441862?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
[133]
E. Rossi and M. Sleat, ‘Realism in Normative Political Theory’, Philosophy Compass, vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 689–701, 2014, doi: 10.1111/phc3.12148.
[134]
E. Hall and M. Sleat, ‘Ethics, Morality and the Case for Realist Political Theory’, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 278–295, 2017, doi: 10.1080/13698230.2017.1293343.
[135]
W. A. Galston, ‘Realism in Political Theory’, European Journal of Political Theory, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 385–411, 2010, doi: 10.1177/1474885110374001.
[136]
G. Newey, After Politics: The Rejection of Politics in Contemporary Liberal Philosophy. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2001.
[137]
K. Forrester, ‘Judith Shklar, Bernard Williams and Political Realism’, European Journal of Political Theory, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 247–272, 2012, doi: 10.1177/1474885111430605.
[138]
P. Markell, ‘Review of Raymond Geuss, Philosophy and Real Politics’, Political Theory, vol. 38, no. 1, 2010 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/25655543?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
[139]
A. Baderin, ‘Two Forms of Realism in Political Theory’, European Journal of Political Theory, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 132–153, 2014, doi: 10.1177/1474885113483284.
[140]
‘Is There a Distinctively Political Normativity?’ [Online]. Available: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdfplus/10.1086/697449
[141]
R. Jubb, ‘On What Political Normativity Is’, Political Studies Review, 2019.