[1]
Abou-Rihan, F. 2008. Deleuze and Guattari: A Psychoanalytic Itinerary. Continuum.
[2]
Arendt, H. 1971. Thinking and Moral Considerations: A Lecture. Social Research. 38, 3 (1971).
[3]
Bacon, M. 2010. Breaking Up Is Hard to Do: John Gray’s Complicated Relationship With the Liberal Project. Social Theory and Practice. 36, 3 (2010).
[4]
Baderin, A. 2014. Two Forms of Realism in Political Theory. European Journal of Political Theory. 13, 2 (2014), 132–153. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885113483284.
[5]
de Beauvoir, S. 2015. Ambiguity and Freedom. The Ethics of Ambiguity. Philosophical Library.
[6]
de Beauvoir, S. 2015. Personal Freedom and Others. The Ethics of Ambiguity. Philosophical Library.
[7]
de Beauvoir, S. 2015. The Positive Aspect of Ambiguity. The Ethics of Ambiguity. Philosophical Library.
[8]
Bogue, R. 1989. Deleuze and Guattari. Routledge.
[9]
Boothby, R. 1991. Death and Desire: Psychoanalytic Theory in Lacan’s Return to Freud. Routledge.
[10]
Bradshaw, L. 1989. Acting and Thinking: The Political Thought of Hannah Arendt. University of Toronto Press.
[11]
Brennan, T. 1991. An Impasse in Psychoanalysis and Feminism. A Reader in Feminist Knowledge. Routledge.
[12]
Brennan, T. 1989. Between Feminism and Psychoanalysis. Routledge.
[13]
Brennan, T. 1989. Between Feminism and Psychoanalysis. Routledge.
[14]
Buchanan, I. 2008. Deleuze and Guattari’s Anti-Oedipus: A Reader’s Guide. Continuum.
[15]
Buchanan, I. 2000. Deleuzism: A Metacommentary. Edinburgh University Press.
[16]
Burke, C. et al. 1994. Engaging with Irigaray: Feminist Philosophy and Modern European Thought. Columbia University Press.
[17]
Calhoun, C.J. and McGowan, J.P. 1997. Hannah Arendt and the Meaning of Politics. University of Minnesota Press.
[18]
Camus, A. 2005. Absurd Creation. The Myth of Sisyphus. Penguin Books.
[19]
Camus, A. 2005. An Absurd Reasoning. The Myth of Sisyphus. Penguin Books.
[20]
Camus, A. 2005. The Absurd Man. The Myth of Sisyphus. Penguin Books.
[21]
Camus, A. 2005. The Myth of Sisyphus. The Myth of Sisyphus. Penguin Books.
[22]
Canovan, M. 1994. Hannah Arendt: A Reinterpretation of Her Political Thought. Cambridge University Press.
[23]
Canovan, M. 1992. Hannah Arendt: A Reinterpretation of Her Political Thought. Cambridge University Press.
[24]
Canovan, M. 1974. The Political Thought of Hannah Arendt. Dent.
[25]
Card, C. 2003. The Cambridge Companion to Simone de Beauvoir. Cambridge University Press.
[26]
Chanter, T. 1995. Ethics of Eros: Irigaray’s Re-Writing of the Philosophers. Routledge.
[27]
De Bolle, L. 2010. Deleuze and Psychoanalysis: Philosophical Essays on Deleuze’s Debate With Psychoanalysis. Leuven University Press.
[28]
Deleuze, G. et al. 2009. Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Penguin Books.
[29]
Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F. 1983. Anti-Oedipus: capitalism and schizophrenia. University of Minnesota Press.
[30]
Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F. 2004. November 28, 1947: How Do You Make Yourself a Body Without Organs? A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Continuum.
[31]
Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F. 2004. Year Zero: Faciality. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Continuum.
[32]
Deutscher, P. 2008. The Philosophy of Simone De Beauvoir: Ambiguity, Conversion, Resistance. Cambridge University Press.
[33]
Disch, L.J. 1996. Hannah Arendt and the Limits of Philosophy: With a New Preface. Cornell University Press.
[34]
Dreyfus, H.L. 2005. Overcoming the Myth of the Mental: How Philosophers Can Profit From the Phenomenology of Everyday Expertise. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association. 79, 2 (2005).
[35]
Dreyfus, H.L. 2007. Response to McDowell. Inquiry. 50, 4 (2007), 371–377. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00201740701489401.
[36]
Dreyfus, H.L. 2007. The Return of the Myth of the Mental. Inquiry. 50, 4 (2007), 352–365. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00201740701489245.
[37]
Enoch, D. 2015. Against Public Reason. Oxford Studies in Political Philosophy: Volume 1. D. Sobel et al., eds. Oxford University Press.
[38]
Estlund, D. and Gaus, G.F. 1999. Justificatory Liberalism: An Essay on Epistemology and Political Theory. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 59, 3 (1999). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/2653803.
[39]
Finlayson, L. 2015. Beware! Beware! The Forest of Sin!: Reluctant Reflections on Rawls. The Political Is Political: Conformity and the Illusion of Dissent in Contemporary Political Philosophy. Rowman & Littlefield International.
[40]
Foley, J. and Foley John Staff 2008. Albert Camus: from the absurd to revolt. Acumen.
[41]
Forrester, K. 2012. Judith Shklar, Bernard Williams and Political Realism. European Journal of Political Theory. 11, 3 (2012), 247–272. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885111430605.
[42]
Freyenhagen, F. 2011. Taking Reasonable Pluralism Seriously: An Internal Critique of Political Liberalism. Politics, Philosophy & Economics. 10, 3 (2011), 323–342. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X10388381.
[43]
Galston, W.A. 2010. Realism in Political Theory. European Journal of Political Theory. 9, 4 (2010), 385–411. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885110374001.
[44]
Gascoigne, N. and Thornton, T. 2013. Being in the Background. Tacit Knowledge. Acumen.
[45]
Gascoigne, N. and Thornton, T. 2013. Being in the Background. Tacit Knowledge. Acumen.
[46]
Gaus, G.F. 1999. Reasonable Pluralism and the Domain of the Political: How the Weaknesses of John Rawls’s Political Liberalism Can Be Overcome by a Justificatory Liberalism. Inquiry. 42, 2 (1999), 259–284. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/002017499321570.
[47]
Gaus, G.F. 1995. The Rational, the Reasonable and Justification. Journal of Political Philosophy. 3, 3 (1995), 234–258.
[48]
Gledhill, J. 2012. Rawls and Realism. Social Theory and Practice. 38, 1 (2012).
[49]
Goodchild, P. 1996. Deleuze and Guattari: The Politics of Desire. Sage.
[50]
Gray, J. 2000. Modus Vivendi. Two Faces of Liberalism. New Press.
[51]
Grosz, E.A. 1990. Jacques Lacan: A Feminist Introduction. Routledge.
[52]
Grosz, E.A. 1989. Sexual Subversions:  Three French Feminists. Allen & Unwin.
[53]
Guess, R. 2008. Part I: Realism. Philosophy and Real Politics. Princeton University Press.
[54]
Hall, E. and Sleat, M. 2017. Ethics, Morality and the Case for Realist Political Theory. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy. 20, 3 (2017), 278–295. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2017.1293343.
[55]
Hanna, T. 1958. The Thought and Art of Albert Camus. Regnery.
[56]
Holland, E.W. 2013. Deleuze and Guattari’s A thousand plateaus: a reader’s guide. Bloomsbury.
[57]
Holland, E.W. 1999. Deleuze and Guattari’s Anti-Oedipus: Introduction to Schizoanalysis. Routledge.
[58]
Holland, E.W. 1999. Deleuze and Guattari’s Anti-Oedipus: Introduction to Schizoanalysis. Routledge.
[59]
Horton, J. 2010. Realism, Liberal Moralism and a Political Theory of Modus Vivendi. European Journal of Political Theory. 9, 4 (2010), 431–448. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885110374004.
[60]
Hughes, E.J. 2007. The Cambridge Companion to Camus. Cambridge University Press.
[61]
Hughes, E.J. 2007. The Cambridge Companion to Camus. Cambridge University Press.
[62]
Ingaray, L. 1985. Cosi Fan Tuti. This Sex Which Is Not One. Cornell University Press.
[63]
Is There a Distinctively Political Normativity? https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdfplus/10.1086/697449.
[64]
Jubb, R. 2019. On What Political Normativity Is. Political Studies Review. (2019).
[65]
Kaufman, E. and Heller, K.J. 1998. Deleuze and Guattari: New Mappings in Politics, Philosophy and Culture. University of Minnesota Press.
[66]
Kelly, S.D. 2000. Grasping at Straws: Motor Intentionality and the Cognitive Science of Skilled Behaviour. Heidegger, Coping, and Cognitive Science. MIT Press.
[67]
Kelly, S.D. 2002. Merleau-Ponty on the Body. Ratio. 15, 4 (2002), 376–391. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9329.00198.
[68]
Kripke, S.A. 1982. Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language: An Elementary Exposition. Harvard University Press.
[69]
Kripke, S.A. 1982. Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language: An Elementary Exposition. Blackwell Pub.
[70]
Kruks, S. 2012. Simone De Beauvoir and the Politics of Ambiguity. Oxford University Press.
[71]
Lacan, J. and Sheridan, A. 1977. The Mirror Stage as Formative of the Function of the I. Écrits: A Selection. Routledge.
[72]
Lacan, J. and Sheridan, A. 1977. The Signification of the Phallus. Écrits: A Selection. Routledge.
[73]
Lacan, J. and Sheridan, A. 1977. The Subversion of the Subject and the Dialectic of Desire in the Freudian Unconscious. Écrits: A Selection. Routledge.
[74]
Lambert, G. 2002. The Non-Philosophy of Gilles Deleuze. Continuum.
[75]
Langer, M. 1994. A Philosophical Retrieval of Simone De Beauvoir’s Pour Une Morale De L’amiguité. Philosophy Today. 38, (1994), 286–309.
[76]
Lorraine, T. 1999. Irigaray and Deleuze: Experiments in Visceral Thought. Cornell University Press.
[77]
Markell, P. 2010. Review of Raymond Geuss, Philosophy and Real Politics. Political Theory. 38, 1 (2010).
[78]
Massumi, B. 1992. A User’s Guide to Capitalism and Schizophrenia: Deviations From Deleuze and Guattari. MIT Press.
[79]
McBride, J. 1992. Albert Camus. St. Martin’s Press.
[80]
McCabe, D. 2010. Modus vivendi liberalism: theory and practice. Cambridge University Press.
[81]
McCarthy, P. 1982. Camus. Random House.
[82]
McDowell, J. 2007. Response to Dreyfus. Inquiry. 50, 4 (2007), 366–370. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00201740701489351.
[83]
Mcdowell, J. 2007. What Myth? Inquiry. 50, 4 (2007), 338–351. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00201740701489211.
[84]
McDowell, J. 1984. Wittgenstein on Following a Rule. Synthese. 58, 3 (1984).
[85]
McGowan, J. 1998. Hannah Arendt: An Introduction. University of Minnesota Press.
[86]
McGowan, J. 1998. Hannah Arendt: An Introduction. University of Minnesota Press.
[87]
Merleau-Ponty, M. and Landes, D.A. 2014. Phenomenology of Perception. Routledge.
[88]
Merleau-Ponty, M. and Landes, D.A. 2012. Phenomenology of Perception. Routledge.
[89]
Miller, A. 2004. Rule-Following and Externalism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 68, 1 (2004).
[90]
Mitchell, J. and Rose, J. eds. 1985. Feminine Sexuality: Jacques Lacan and the Ecole Freudienne. W.W. Norton & Company.
[91]
Mitchell, J. and Rose, J. 1982. God and the Jouissance of the Woman; A Love Letter. Feminine Sexuality: Jacques Lacan and the Ecole Freudienne. J. Mitchell and J. Rose, eds. W.W. Norton & Company.
[92]
Moi, T. 1987. French Feminist Thought: A Reader. Blackwell.
[93]
Newey, G. 2001. After Politics: The Rejection of Politics in Contemporary Liberal Philosophy. Palgrave.
[94]
Noë, A. 2005. Against Intellectualism. Analysis. 65, 4 (2005).
[95]
Parekh, B.C. 2014. Hannah Arendt and the Search for a New Political Philosophy. [Palgrave Macmillan].
[96]
Parr, A. 2005. The Deleuze Dictionary. Edinburgh University Press.
[97]
Patton, P. Deleuze: A Critical Reader.
[98]
Patton, P. 2000. Deleuze and the Political. Routledge.
[99]
Philp, M. 2012. Realism Without Illusions. Political Theory. 40, 5 (2012).
[100]
Pluth, E. 2007. Lacan’s Subversion of the Subject. Continental Philosophy Review. 39, 3 (2007), 293–312. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-006-9024-3.
[101]
Rawls, J. 1985. Justice as Fairness: Political not Metaphysical. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 14, 3 (1985).
[102]
Rose, J. 1987. Femininity and its Discontents. Sexuality: A Reader. Virago.
[103]
Rossi, E. and Sleat, M. 2014. Realism in Normative Political Theory. Philosophy Compass. 9, 10 (2014), 689–701. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12148.
[104]
Runciman, D. 2012. What Is Realistic Political Philosophy? Metaphilosophy. 43, 1 (2012).
[105]
Rutherford, N. 2018. Instability and Modus Vivendi. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy. (2018), 1–22. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2018.1525119.
[106]
Ryle, G. 2000. Descartes’ Myth. The Concept of Mind. Penguin.
[107]
Ryle, G. 2000. Knowing How and Knowing That. The Concept of Mind. Penguin.
[108]
Ryle, G. 1946. Knowing How and Knowing That: The Presidential Address. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. 46, (1946).
[109]
Sagi, A. 2002. Albert Camus and the Philosophy of the Absurd. Rodopi.
[110]
Sartre, J.-P. 2003. Being and Nothingness: An Essay on Phenomenological Ontology. Routledge.
[111]
Sartre, J.-P. 2003. Being and Nothingness: An Essay on Phenomenological Ontology. Routledge.
[112]
Sartre, J.-P. 2003. Being and Nothingness: An Essay on Phenomenological Ontology. Routledge.
[113]
Scalon, T.M. 2003. Rawls on Justification. The Cambridge Companion to Rawls. Cambridge University Press.
[114]
Schear, J.K. 2013. Mind, Reason and Being-in-the-World: The McDowell-Dreyfus Debate. Routledge.
[115]
Schear, J.K. 2013. Mind, Reason and Being-in-the-World: The McDowell-Dreyfus Debate. Routledge.
[116]
Schuster, A. 2016. The Trouble with Pleasure.
[117]
Searle, J.R. 1996. Background Abilities and the Explanation of Social Phenomena. The Construction of Social Reality. Penguin.
[118]
Searle, J.R. 1996. Introduction. The Construction of Social Reality. Penguin.
[119]
Searle, J.R. 1996. The Building Blocks of Social Reality. The Construction of Social Reality. Penguin.
[120]
Sleat, M. 2013. Liberal Realism: A Realist Theory of Liberal Politics. Manchester Univ Pr.
[121]
Somers-Hall, H. et al. eds. 2018. A Thousand Plateaus and Philosophy. Edinburgh University Press.
[122]
Sprintzen, D. 1991. Camus. Temple University Press.
[123]
Srigley, R. 2011. Albert Camus Critique of Modernity. University of Missouri Press.
[124]
Stanley, J. and Willlamson, T. 2001. Knowing How. Journal of Philosophy. 98, 8 (2001), 411–444. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/2678403.
[125]
Stavrakakis, Y. 1999. Lacan and the Political. Routledge.
[126]
Stivale, C.J. 2005. Gilles Deleuze: Key Concepts. Acumen.
[127]
Stivale, C.J. 1998. The Two-Fold Thought of Deleuze and Guattari: Intersections and Animations. Guilford Press.
[128]
Wall, S. 2002. Is Public Justification Self-Defeating? American Philosophical Quarterly. 39, 4 (2002).
[129]
Weithman, P.J. 2010. Why Political Liberalism?: On John Rawls’s Political Turn. Oxford University Press.
[130]
Weithman, P.J. 2010. Why Political Liberalism?: On John Rawls’s Political Turn. Oxford University Press.
[131]
Whitford, M. 1991. Luce Irigaray: Philosophy in the Feminine. Routledge.
[132]
Widder, N. 2012. Political Theory After Deleuze. Continuum.
[133]
Widder, N. 2012. Political Theory After Deleuze. Continuum.
[134]
Widder, N. 2008. Reflections on Time and Politics. Pennsylvania State University Press.
[135]
Widder, N. 2015. Two Routes from Hegel. The Onlife Manifesto: Being Human in a Hyperconnected Era. L. Floridi, ed. Springer International Publishing.
[136]
Williams, B. 2008. Realism and Moralism in Political Theory. In the Beginning Was the Deed: Realism and Moralism in Political Argument. Princeton University Press.
[137]
Williams, C. 1994. Feminism, Subjectivity and Psychoanalysis:  Towards a (Corpo)real Knowledge. Knowing the Difference: Feminist Perspectives in Epistemology. Routledge.
[138]
Wilson, E. 1987. Psychoanalysis:  Psychic Law and Order. Sexuality: A Reader. Virago.
[139]
Zizek, S. 2006. How to Read Lacan. Granta Books.
[140]
Zizek, S. 1989. The Sublime Object of Ideology. Verso.
[141]
2018. The Political Theory of Modus Vivendi. Springer International Publishing AG.