Ahmed, Farrah, and Adam Perry, ‘Constitutional Statutes’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 2016 <https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqw030>
———, ‘The Coherence of the Doctrine of Legitimate Expectations’, The Cambridge Law Journal, 73.1 (2014), 61–85 <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197314000026>
Alder, John, and Keith Syrett, Constitutional and Administrative Law, 11th Edition (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017), Palgrave Law Masters
———, ‘The Rule of Law’, in Constitutional and Administrative Law, 11th Edition (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017), Palgrave Law Masters, 121–37
———, ‘Underlying Politcal Traditions’, in Constitutional and Administrative Law, 11th Edition (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017), Palgrave Law Masters, 26–54
‘Ali v United Kingdom: Article 6(1) ECHR and Administrative Decision-Making | Public Law for Everyone’ <https://publiclawforeveryone.com/2016/03/13/ali-v-united-kingdom-article-61-echr-and-administrative-decision-making/>
Allan, T. R. S., ‘Constitutional Dialogue and the Justification of Judicial Review’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 23.4 (2003) <https://www.jstor.org/stable/3600687>
———, Constitutional Justice: A Liberal Theory of the Rule of Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005)
———, Constitutional Justice: A Liberal Theory of the Rule of Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005) <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199267880.001.0001>
———, ‘Human Rights and Judicial Review: A Critique of "Due Deference”’, The Cambridge Law Journal, 65.3 (2006), 671–95 <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197306007264>
———, ‘Judicial Deference and Judicial Review: Legal Doctrine and Legal Theory’, Law Quarterly Review, 127.1 (2011) <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I38697650034411E088BDC597D432CBAC/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>
Allan, T.R.S., ‘The Constitutional Foundations of Judicial Review: Conceptual Conundrum or Interpretative Inquiry?’, The Cambridge Law Journal, 61.1 (2002), 87–125 <https://doi.org/10.1017/S000819730200154X>
‘An Application by Siobhan Mclaughlin for Judicial Review [2016] NICA 53’ <https://judiciaryni.uk/sites/judiciary/files/decisions/McLaughlin%27s%20%28Siobhan%29%20Application.pdf>
Arvind, T. T., ‘The Curious Origins of Judicial Review’, Law Quarterly Review, 2017, 91–117 <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I17F84060BE0811E689319702776550D2/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>
Atrill, Simon, ‘WHO IS THE "FAIR-MINDED AND INFORMED OBSERVER”? BIAS AFTER’, The Cambridge Law Journal, 62.2 (2003), 279–89 <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197303006317>
Attorney General v Jonathan Cape Ltd [1976] QB 752 <http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=http%3A%2F%2Fidp.rhul.ac.uk%2Foala&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI694B9730E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue>
Bamforth, Nicholas, ‘Fairness and Legitimate Expectation in Judicial Review’, The Cambridge Law Journal, 56.1 (1997), 1–4 <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197300017530>
Barber, N. W., ‘Laws and Constitutional Conventions’, Law Quarterly Review, 125 (2009), 294–309 <http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=http%3A%2F%2Fidp.rhul.ac.uk%2Foala&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI69EDD0210ACD11DE953BC0C525628E94%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue>
———, ‘Laws and Constitutional Conventions’, Law Quarterly Review, 2009, 294–309 <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I69EDD0210ACD11DE953BC0C525628E94/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>
———, ‘Prelude to the Separation of Powers’, The Cambridge Law Journal, 60.1 (2001), 59–88 <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197301000629>
———, ‘Review: The Academic Mythologians’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 21.2 (2001) <https://www.jstor.org/stable/20468373>
Bingham, T. H., The Rule of Law (London: Penguin, 2011)
Blake, Nicholas, ‘Importing Proportionality: Clarification or Confusion’, European Human Rights Law Review, 2002, 19–27 <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I84B178A0E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>
‘Blog | UK Constitutional Law Association | Affiliated to the International Association of Constitutional Law’ <https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/blog/>
‘British and Irish Legal Information Institute’ <http://www.bailii.org/>
British Railways Board v Pickin [1974] AC 765 <http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/1974/1.html>
Campbell, N. R., ‘The Duty to Give Reasons in Administrative Law’, Public Law, 1994, 184–91 <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/ID39F4B20E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>
Chan, Cora, ‘A Preliminary Framework for Measuring Deference in Rights Reasoning’, International Journal of Constitutional Law, 14.4 (2016), 851–82 <https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mow058>
Clayton, Richard, ‘The Empire Strikes Back: Common Law Rights and the Human Rights Act’, Public Law, 2015, 3–12 <http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=http%3A%2F%2Fidp.rhul.ac.uk%2Foala&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FIAD111C107B4F11E499B9D6E1F6E110C8%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue>
‘Constitution Committee | UK Parliament’ <http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/lords-select/constitution-committee/>
Council of Civil Service Unions v Minister for the Civil Service [1985] AC 374 <http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/1984/9.html>
Craig, P., ‘Political Constitutionalism and the Judicial Role: A Response’, International Journal of Constitutional Law, 9.1 (2011), 112–31 <https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mor025>
———, ‘The Nature of Reasonableness Review’, Current Legal Problems, 66.1 (2013), 131–67 <https://doi.org/10.1093/clp/cut010>
Craig, Paul, ‘Competing Models of Judicial Review’, Public Law, 1999, 428–47 <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/ID132DF00E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>
———, ‘Formal and Substantive Conceptions of the Rule of Law: An Analytical Framework’, Public Law, 1997, 467–87
———, ‘The Courts, the Human Rights Act and Judicial Review’, Law Quarterly Review, 2001, 589–603 <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I848E3930E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>
———, ‘The Human Rights Act, Article 6 and Procedural Rights’, Public Law, 2003, 753–73 <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I84890911E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>
———, ‘Ultra Vires and the Foundations of Judicial Review’, The Cambridge Law Journal, 57.1 (1998), 63–90 <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197300134397>
Craig, Paul, and Soren Schonberg, ‘Substantive Legitimate Expectations After Coughlan’, Public Law, 2000, 684–701 <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I84A4F580E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>
Craig, Robert, ‘A Simple Application of the Frustration Principle: Prerogative, Statute and Miller’, Public Law, 2017 <http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=http%3A%2F%2Fidp.rhul.ac.uk%2Foala&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI8106D680C87411E79CFEFF663275FD29%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue>
Daly, Paul, ‘Justiciability and the “Political Question” Doctrine’, Public Law, 2010, 160–78 <http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=http%3A%2F%2Fidp.rhul.ac.uk%2Foala&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI14A4A19044F511E88D34E20E69C76312%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue>
‘Delegated Legislation | UK Parliament’ <https://www.parliament.uk/about/how/laws/delegated/>
Elliot, Mark, and Robert Thomas, ‘Themes, Sources, and Principles’, in Public Law, 3rd edn ([Oxford]: Oxford University Press, 2017) <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198765899.001.0001>
Elliott, Mark, ‘A Tangled Constitutional Web: The Black-Spider Memos and the British Constitution’s Relational Architecture’, Public Law, 2015, 539–50 <http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=http%3A%2F%2Fidp.rhul.ac.uk%2Foala&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI3A34F4805C5611E58916B963212E7CCD%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue>
———, ‘Judicial Power and the United Kingdom’s Changing Constitution | Public Law for Everyone’, 2018 <https://publiclawforeveryone.com/2017/10/31/judicial-power-and-the-united-kingdoms-changing-constitution/>
———, ‘Legitimate Expectations: Procedure, Substance, Policy and Proportionality’, The Cambridge Law Journal, 65.2 (2006), 254–56 <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197306227119>
———, ‘Mark Elliott: Justification, Calibration and Substantive Judicial Review: Putting Doctrine in Its Place | UK Constitutional Law Association’ <https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2013/09/17/mark-elliott-justification-calibration-and-substantive-judicial-review-putting-doctrine-in-its-place/>
———, ‘The Appearance of Bias, the Fair-Minded and Informed Observer, and the "Ordinary Person in Queen Square Market”’, The Cambridge Law Journal, 71.2 (2012), 247–50 <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197312000372>
———, ‘The Demise of Parliamentary Sovereignty? The Implications for Justifying Judicial Review’, Law Quarterly Review, 1999, 119–37 <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/ICCCA7BD0E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>
———, ‘The Principle of Parliamentary Sovereignty in Legal, Constitutional, and Political Perspective’, in The Changing Constitution, ed. by Jeffrey L. Jowell, Dawn Oliver, and Colm O’Cinneide, 8th Edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015), pp. 38–66
Elliott, Mark, and Robert Thomas, Public Law, 3rd Edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017)
———, Public Law, 3rd edn ([Oxford]: Oxford University Press, 2017) <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198765899.001.0001>
———, ‘Themes, Sources, and Principles’, in Public Law, 3rd Edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017), pp. 36–86
‘European Court of Human Rights’ <http://www.echr.coe.int/Pages/home.aspx?p=home>
‘Exercise of Discretion in Administrative Decision-Making’ <http://www.ombudsman.wa.gov.au/Publications/Documents/guidelines/Exercise-of-discretion-in-admin-decision-making.pdf>
Feldman, David, ‘None, One or Several? Perspectives on the UK’s Constitution(s)’, The Cambridge Law Journal, 64.2 (2005), 329–51 <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197305006884>
Fenwick, Helen, ‘The Anti–Terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001: A Proportionate Response to 11 September?’, The Modern Law Review, 65.5 (2002), 724–62 <https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.00405>
Ferreira, Nuno, ‘The Supreme Court in a Final Push to Go Beyond Strasbourg’, Public Law, 2015 <http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=http%3A%2F%2Fidp.rhul.ac.uk%2Foala&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI5409B340105311E5995D9B4942D36284%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue>
Forsyth, Christopher, ‘Of Fig Leaves and Fairy Tales: The Ultra Vires Doctrine, the Sovereignty of Parliament and Judicial Review’, The Cambridge Law Journal, 55.1 (1996), 122–40 <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197300097762>
Forsyth, Christopher, and Mark Elliott, ‘The Legitimacy of Judicial Review’, Public Law, 2003, 286–307 <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I795AA3A0E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>
‘Gavin Phillipson: Historic Commons Syria Vote: The Constitutional Significance (Part I) | UK Constitutional Law Association’ <https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2013/09/19/gavin-phillipson-historic-commons-syria-vote-the-constitutional-significance-part-i/>
‘Gavin Phillipson: Historic Commons Syria Vote: The Constitutional Significance. Part II the Way Forward | UK Constitutional Law Association’ <https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2013/11/29/gavin-phillipson-historic-commons-syria-vote-the-constitutional-significance-part-ii-the-way-forward/>
Gee, G., and G. C. N. Webber, ‘What Is a Political Constitution?’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 30.2 (2010), 273–99 <https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqq013>
Ghaidan v. Godin-Mendoza [2004] UKHL 30 <http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2004/30.html>
Goldsworthy, J., ‘Homogenizing Constitutions’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 23.3 (2003), 483–505 <https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/23.3.483>
Gordon, Michael, Parliamentary Sovereignty in the UK Constitution: Process, Politics and Democracy (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2015), v. 4 <http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781474201667>
Gregson, Rory, ‘When Should There Be an Implied Power to Delegate?’, Public Law, 2017, 408–25 <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IB5E035E04C6411E79A6EF925F51871C7/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>
Hale, B., ‘Argentoratum Locutum: Is Strasbourg or the Supreme Court Supreme?’, Human Rights Law Review, 12.1 (2012), 65–78 <https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngs001>
Hale, Lady, ‘The UK Supreme Court in the UK Constitution’ (Inaugural Lecture at the Institute for Legal and Constitutional Research, University of St Andrews, 8th of October 2015, 2015, pp. 1–17 <https://www.supremecourt.uk/docs/speech-151008.pdf>
Hickman, Tom, ‘The Substance and Structure of Proportionality’, Public Law, 2008, 694–716 <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I010EBB7099A111DD9611E019A6BFBE26/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>
Hilson, Chris, ‘Judicial Review, Policies and the Fettering of Discretion’, Public Law, 2002, 111–29 <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/ID10F7880E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>
Human Rights Act 1998 <http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=http%3A%2F%2Fidp.rhul.ac.uk%2Foala&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI5FB840F0E42311DAA7CF8F68F6EE57AB%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue>
‘In the Matter of an Application by Siobhan McLaughlin for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland) [2018] UKSC 48’ <https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uksc-2017-0035-judgment.pdf>
‘International Journal of Constitutional Law’ <https://librarysearch.royalholloway.ac.uk/permalink/44ROY_INST/16u3s8/alma997000681902671>
Jackson & Ors v. Her Majesty’s Attorney General [2005] UKHL 56 <http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2005/56.html>
——— <http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2005/56.html>
Jaconelli, Joseph, ‘Do Constitutional Conventions Bind?’, The Cambridge Law Journal, 64.1 (2005), 149–76 <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197305006823>
———, ‘Do Constitutional Conventions Bind?’, The Cambridge Law Journal, 64.1 (2005), 149–76 <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197305006823>
Jones, Brian Christopher, ‘Preliminary Warnings on “Constitutional” Idolatry’, Public Law, 2016, 74–92 <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IE932C1D09A7F11E5ACC99E2443923C19/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>
Jowell, Jeffrey, ‘Of Vires and Vacuums: The Constitutional Context of Judicial Review’, Public Law, 1999, 448–60 <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/ID1392090E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>
———, ‘Parliamentary Sovereignty Under the New Constitutional Hypothesis’, Public Law, 2006, 562–79
Jowell, Jeffrey, and Anthony Lester, ‘Beyond Wednesbury: Substantive Principles of Administrative Law’, Commonwealth Law Bulletin, 14.2 (1988), 858–70 <https://doi.org/10.1080/03050718.1988.9985971>
Kavanaugh, Aileen, ‘Defending Deference in Public Law and Constitutional Theory’, Law Quarterly Review, 222 (2010) <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IF3B510D22E5211DFBE2FA967ED04D069/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>
Knight, C. J. S., ‘A Framework for Fettering’, Judicial Review, 14.1 (2009), 73–80 <https://doi.org/10.1080/10854681.2009.11426590>
Le Sueur, A. P., ‘Legal Duties to Give Reasons’, Current Legal Problems, 52.1 (1999), 150–72 <https://doi.org/10.1093/clp/52.1.150>
Le Sueur, A. P., Maurice Sunkin, and Jo Eric Murkens, Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials, 3rd Edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016)
———, Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials, 4th edn ([Oxford]: Oxford University Press, 2019) <http://doi.org.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/10.1093/he/9780198820284.001.0001>
‘Legal Studies: The Journal of the Society of Legal Scholars’ <https://librarysearch.royalholloway.ac.uk/permalink/44ROY_INST/16u3s8/alma997017693302671>
Lever, Annabelle, ‘Is Judicial Review Undemocratic?’, Public Law, 2007, 280–98 <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I25BAEDE0E30911DB9628FD37664FF158/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>
Liversidge v Anderson [1941] UKHL 1 <http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/1941/1.html>
Lord Lester of Herne Hill, ‘Developing Constitutional Principles of Public Law’, Public Law, 2001, 684–94 <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I849E17B0E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>
Loveland, Ian, Constitutional Law, Administrative Law, and Human Rights: A Critical Introduction, 9th Edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021)
———, Constitutional Law, Administrative Law, and Human Rights: A Critical Introduction, 9th Edition ([Oxford]: Oxford University Press, 2021)
———, ‘Does Homelessness Decision Making Engage Article 6(1) of the European Convention on Human Rights?’, European Human Rights Law Review, 2003, 176–204 <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I7E856C70E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>
———, ‘Human Rights II: Emergent Principles’, in Constitutional Law, Administrative Law, and Human Rights: A Critical Introduction, 7th Edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015), pp. 588–615
———, ‘Human Rights II: Emergent Principles’, in Constitutional Law, Administrative Law, and Human Rights: A Critical Introduction, 8th edn ([Oxford]: Oxford University Press, 2018) <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198804680.001.0001>
Malleson, Kate, ‘Judicial Bias and Disqualification After Pinochet (No. 2)’, Modern Law Review, 63.1 (2000), 119–27 <https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.00254>
‘Mark Elliot: Reflections on the HS2 Case: A Hierarchy of Domestic Constitutional Norms and the Qualified Primacy of EU Law | UK Constitutional Law Association’ <https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2014/01/23/mark-elliot-reflections-on-the-hs2-case-a-hierarchy-of-domestic-constitutional-norms-and-the-qualified-primacy-of-eu-law/>
Masterman, Roger, and Colin Murray, ‘Law, Politics, and the United Kingdom Constitution’, in Exploring Constitutional and Administrative Law (Harlow, England: Pearson, 2013), pp. 88–108
———, ‘Law, Politics, and the United Kingdom Constitution’, in Exploring Constitutional and Administrative Law, 2003, pp. 88–108 <http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=13409289760002671&institutionId=2671&customerId=2670>
‘McLoughlin Supreme Court Press Summary’ <https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uksc-2017-0035-press-summary.pdf>
Miller & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union (Rev 3) [2017] UKSC 5 <http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKSC/2017/5.html>
Murkens, Jo Eric Khushal, ‘Democracy as the Legitimating Condition in the UK Constitution’, Legal Studies, 38.01 (2018), 42–58 <https://doi.org/10.1017/lst.2017.10>
Nicol, Danny, ‘Law and Politics After the Human Rights Act’, Public Law, 2006, 722–51 <http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=http%3A%2F%2Fidp.rhul.ac.uk%2Foala&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI13579C41540511DB85F29853495F842F%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue>
Norris, Martin, ‘Ex Parte Smith: Irrationality and Human Rights’, Public Law, 1996, 590–600 <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/ID37F6710E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>
Oliver, Dawn, ‘Is the Ultra Vires Rule the Basis of Judicial Review?’, Public Law, 1987, 543–69 <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/ID3D7E750E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>
Olowofoyeku, Abimbola A., ‘Bias and the Informed Observer: A Call for a Return to Gough’, The Cambridge Law Journal, 68.2 (2009), 388–409 <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197309000373>
———, ‘The Nemo Judex Rule: The Case Against Automatic Disqualification’, Public Law, 2000, 456–75 <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/ID12EE760E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>
‘Oxford Journal of Legal Studies’ <https://librarysearch.royalholloway.ac.uk/permalink/44ROY_INST/70508m/alma997001809702671>
Perry, Adam, and Adam Tucker, ‘Top-Down Constitutional Conventions’, The Modern Law Review, 81.5 (2018), 765–89 <https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12364>
Phillipson, Gavin, ‘“Historic” Commons’ Syria Vote: The Constitutional Significance. Part I | UK Constitutional Law Association’ <https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2013/09/19/gavin-phillipson-historic-commons-syria-vote-the-constitutional-significance-part-i/>
———, ‘"Historic” Commons’ Syria Vote: The Constitutional Significance. Part II | the Way Forward – UK Constitutional Law Association’ <https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2013/11/29/gavin-phillipson-historic-commons-syria-vote-the-constitutional-significance-part-ii-the-way-forward/>
‘Political and Constitutional Reform Committee | UK Parliament’ <http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/political-and-constitutional-reform-committee/>
Poole, Thomas, ‘Of Headscarves and Heresies: The Denbigh High School Case and Public Authority Decision-Making Under the Human Rights Act’, Public Law, 2005, 685–95 <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I848A1A80E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>
———, ‘The Reformation of English Administrative Law’, The Cambridge Law Journal, 68.1 (2009), 142–68 <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197309000063>
‘Principles of Good Administration | Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman (PHSO)’ <https://www.ombudsman.org.uk/about-us/our-principles/principles-good-administration>
‘Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee | UK Parliament’ <http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/public-administration-and-constitutional-affairs-committee/>
‘Public Law’ <https://uk.westlaw.com/WestlawUk/Journals/Publications/Public-Law>
R (Chester) v Secretary of State for Justice [2013] UKSC 63 <http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKSC/2013/63.html>
R (Evans) v Attorney General [2015] UKSC 21 <http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKSC/2015/21.html>
R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5, [40]-[49] <https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/uksc-2016-0196.html>
R (on the application of Nicklinson and another) (Appellants) v Ministry of Justice (Respondent) [2014] UKSC 38 <https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/uksc-2013-0235.html>
Rainey, Bernadette, Elizabeth Wicks, and Clare Ovey, ‘Context, Background, and Institutions’, in Jacobs, White and Ovey: The European Convention on Human Rights, 6th Edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014), pp. 3–20
Ringhand, Lori, ‘Fig Leaves, Fairy Tales, and Constitutional Foundations: Debating Judicial Review in Britain’, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 43.3 (2005) <http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/cjtl43&id=1>
Rivers, Julian, ‘Proportionality and Variable Intensity of Review’, Cambridge Law Journal, 65 (2006), 174–207 <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IFB69CD50E72A11DC88EB9BE684C867E2/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>
Sales, Philip, ‘Rationality, Proportionality and the Development of the Law’, Law Quarterly Review, 2013, 223–41 <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I69812151881411E2BACCBED531DFD77E/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>
Stanton, John, and Craig Prescott, ‘Judicial Review: Access to Review and Remedies’, in Public Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018)
———, ‘Judicial Review: Access to Review and Remedies’, in Public Law ([Oxford]: Oxford University Press, 2018) <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198722939.001.0001>
———, ‘Judicial Review: Illegality’, in Public Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018)
———, ‘Judicial Review: Illegality’, in Public Law ([Oxford]: Oxford University Press, 2018) <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198722939.001.0001>
———, ‘Judicial Review: Irrationality and Proportionality’, in Public Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018)
———, ‘Judicial Review: Irrationality and Proportionality’, in Public Law ([Oxford]: Oxford University Press, 2018) <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198722939.001.0001>
———, ‘Judicial Review: Procedural Impropriety’, in Public Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018)
———, ‘Judicial Review: Procedural Impropriety’, in Public Law ([Oxford]: Oxford University Press, 2018) <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198722939.001.0001>
———, ‘Judicial Review: Procedural Impropriety’, in Public Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018)
———, ‘Judicial Review: Procedural Impropriety’, in Public Law ([Oxford]: Oxford University Press, 2018) <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198722939.001.0001>
———, Public Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018)
———, ‘The Royal Prerogative and Constitutional Conventions’, in Public Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018)
———, ‘The Royal Prerogative and Constitutional Conventions’, in Public Law ([Oxford]: Oxford University Press, 2018) <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198722939.001.0001>
Stanton, John, Craig Prescott, and David Mead, Public Law ([Oxford]: Oxford University Press, 2018) <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198722939.001.0001>
Stark, Shona Wilson, ‘Facing Facts: Judicial Approaches to Section 4 of the Human Rights Act 1998’, Law Quarterly Review, 2017 <http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=http%3A%2F%2Fidp.rhul.ac.uk%2Foala&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI553CB880985E11E7BEB8FD7157D7F73E%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue>
Supperstone, Michael, and Jason Coppel, ‘Judicial Review After the Human Rights Act’, European Human Rights Law Review, 1999, 301–29 <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I84ACE4C0E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>
‘Taming the Prerogative: Strengthening Ministerial Accountability to Parliament’ (House of Commons. Public Administration Select Committee, 2003), 3–17 <https://parlipapers.proquest.com/parlipapers/result/pqpdocumentview?accountid=11455&groupid=103502&pgId=c5aea05f-b8ed-42b0-b2e6-8c68938d85ec>
Taylor, Robert Brett, ‘Foundational and Regulatory Conventions: Exploring the Constitutional Significance of Britain’s Dependency Upon Conventions.’, Public Law, 2015, 614–32 <http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=http%3A%2F%2Fidp.rhul.ac.uk%2Foala&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI3A36A2305C5611E58916B963212E7CCD%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue>
———, ‘Foundational and Regulatory Conventions: Exploring the Constitutional Significance of Britain’s Dependency Upon Conventions’, Public Law, 2015, 614–32 <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I3A36A2305C5611E58916B963212E7CCD/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>
‘The Cambridge Law Journal’ <https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/cambridge-law-journal>
‘The Constitution Unit Blog’ <https://constitution-unit.com/>
‘The Law Quarterly Review’
‘The Modern Law Review’ <https://librarysearch.royalholloway.ac.uk/permalink/44ROY_INST/16u3s8/alma997003019902671>
Tomkins, A., ‘In Defence of the Political Constitution’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 22.1 (2002), 157–75 <https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/22.1.157>
‘Tomlinson and Others v Birmingham City Council [2010] UKSC 8’ <https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uksc-2009-0050-judgment.pdf>
‘———’ <https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uksc-2009-0050-judgment.pdf>
Tomlinson, Joe, ‘The Narrow Approach to Substantive Legitimate Expectations and the Trend of Modern Authority’, Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal, 17.1 (2017), 75–84 <https://doi.org/10.1080/14729342.2017.1311514>
Turner, Ian, ‘Irrationality, the Human Rights Act and the Limits of Merits-Review’, Nottingham Law Journal, 18 (2009), 18–36 <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IC5A4DCE02B5711E08221F700C27502AE/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>
‘UK Constitutional Law Association Blog | International Association of Constitutional Law’ <https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/blog/>
‘UK Human Rights Blog’ <https://ukhumanrightsblog.com/>
‘UK Parliament’ <http://www.parliament.uk/>
‘Unmarried Mother Siobhan McLaughlin Wins Supreme Court Benefit Case | BBC’, 2018 <https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-45355028>
‘Unmarried Mother Wins Supreme Court Fight for Widowed Parents’ Allowance | Good Morning Britain | YouTube’ <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cs4viID3KWI>
Varuhas, Jason N.E., ‘The Reformation of English Administrative Law? "Rights”, Rhetoric and Reality’, The Cambridge Law Journal, 72.2 (2013), 369–413 <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197313000500>
———, ‘The Reformation of English Administrative Law? "Rights”, Rhetoric and Reality’, The Cambridge Law Journal, 72.2 (2013), 369–413 <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197313000500>
Waldron, Jeremy, ‘The Core of the Case Against Judicial Review’, The Yale Law Journal, 115.6 (2006) <https://doi.org/10.2307/20455656>
Walker, Paul, ‘What’s Wrong With Irrationality?’, Public Law, 1995, 556–76 <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/ID3967180E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>
Watson, Jack, ‘Clarity and Ambiguity: A New Approach to the Test of Legitimacy in the Law of Legitimate Expectations’, Legal Studies, 30.4 (2010), 633–52 <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-121X.2010.00177.x>
Webley, Lisa, and Harriet Samuels, Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials, Fifth edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021)
———, Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials, 5th Edition ([Oxford]: Oxford University Press, 2021) <https://doi-org.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/10.1093/he/9780198853183.001.0001>
———, ‘“Constitutional Organisations, Institutions and Roles” and “The Nature of the British Constitution”’, in Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials, 3rd Edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018), Complete, 13–15
———, ‘“Constitutional Organisations, Institutions and Roles” and “The Nature of the British Constitution”’, in Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials, 4th edn ([Oxford]: Oxford University Press, 2018) <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198798064.001.0001>
———, ‘Human Rights’, in Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials, 3rd Edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015), Complete, 255–90
———, ‘Human Rights’, in Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials, 4th edn ([Oxford]: Oxford University Press, 2018) <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198798064.001.0001>
———, ‘Human Rights’, in Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials, 3rd Edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015), Complete, 255–90
———, ‘Human Rights’, in Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials, 4th edn ([Oxford]: Oxford University Press, 2018) <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198798064.001.0001>
———, ‘Illegality’, in Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials, Fourth edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018)
———, ‘Illegality’, in Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials, 4th edn ([Oxford]: Oxford University Press, 2018) <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198798064.001.0001>
———, ‘Irrationality and Proportionality’, in Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials, Fourth edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018)
———, ‘Irrationality and Proportionality’, in Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials, 4th edn ([Oxford]: Oxford University Press, 2018) <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198798064.001.0001>
———, ‘Parliamentary Supremacy: The Theory’, in Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials, 3rd Edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015), Complete, 185–226
———, ‘Parliamentary Supremacy: The Theory’, in Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials, 4th edn ([Oxford]: Oxford University Press, 2018) <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198798064.001.0001>
———, ‘Procedural Impropriety’, in Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials, Fourth edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018)
———, ‘Procedural Impropriety’, in Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials, 4th edn ([Oxford]: Oxford University Press, 2018) <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198798064.001.0001>
———, ‘Procedural Impropriety’, in Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials, Fourth edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018)
———, ‘Procedural Impropriety’, in Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials, 4th edn ([Oxford]: Oxford University Press, 2018) <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198798064.001.0001>
———, ‘The Crown Royal Perogative’, in Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials, 3rd Edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015), Complete, 145–82
———, ‘The Crown Royal Perogative’, in Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials, 4th edn ([Oxford]: Oxford University Press, 2018) <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198798064.001.0001>
———, ‘The Role of Constitutional Conventions’, in Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials, 3rd Edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015), Complete, 365–93
———, ‘The Role of Constitutional Conventions’, Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials ([Oxford]: Oxford University Press, 2018) <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198798064.001.0001>
———, ‘The Role of Constitutional Conventions’, in Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials, Fourth edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018)
———, ‘The Role of Constitutional Conventions’, in Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials, 4th edn ([Oxford]: Oxford University Press, 2018) <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198798064.001.0001>
———, ‘The Role of the Courts, Judicial Review, and Human Rights’, in Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials, Fourth edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018)
———, ‘The Role of the Courts, Judicial Review, and Human Rights’, in Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials, 4th edn ([Oxford]: Oxford University Press, 2018) <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198798064.001.0001>
———, ‘The Rule of Law’, in Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials, 3rd Edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015), Complete, 77–113
———, ‘The Rule of Law’, in Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials, 4th edn ([Oxford]: Oxford University Press, 2018) <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198798064.001.0001>
———, ‘“What Is Public Law” and “Constitutional Organisations, Institutions, and Roles”, and “The Nature of the British Constitution”’, in Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials, 3rd Edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018), Complete, 3–76
———, ‘What Is Public Law’ and “Constitutional Organisations, Institutions, and Roles”, and “The Nature of the British Constitution”’, in Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials, 4th edn ([Oxford]: Oxford University Press, 2018) <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198798064.001.0001>
‘Where Next for the Wednesbury Principle? A Brief Response to Lord Carnwath | Public Law for Everyone’ <https://publiclawforeveryone.com/2013/11/19/where-next-for-the-wednesbury-principle-a-brief-response-to-lord-carnwath/>
Williams, David, ‘Bias; the Judges and the Separation of Powers’, Public Law, 2000, 45–60 <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/ID1246010E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>
Williams, Rebecca, ‘Structuring Substantive Review’, Public Law, 2017, 99–123 <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IF32A9D40BAFC11E695A4FB481AEC10EF/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>
Wong, Garreth, ‘Towards the Nutcracker Principle: Reconsidering the Objections to Proportionality’, Public Law, 2000, 92–109 <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/ID1301FE1E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>
Young, A. L., ‘Will You, Won’t You, Will You Join the Deference Dance?’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 34.2 (2014), 375–94 <https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqu004>
Young, Alison L., ‘Is Dialogue Working Under the Human Rights Act 1998?’, Public Law, 2011, 773–800 <http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=http%3A%2F%2Fidp.rhul.ac.uk%2Foala&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FID7EAF690E23C11E080A9C399189E1576%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue>
