Ahmed, F., & Perry, A. (2014). The Coherence of the Doctrine of Legitimate Expectations. The Cambridge Law Journal, 73(1), 61–85. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197314000026
Ahmed, F., & Perry, A. (2016). Constitutional Statutes. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqw030
Alder, J., & Syrett, K. (2017a). Constitutional and Administrative Law: Vol. Palgrave Law Masters (11th Edition). Palgrave Macmillan.
Alder, J., & Syrett, K. (2017b). The Rule of Law. In Constitutional and Administrative Law: Vol. Palgrave Law Masters (11th Edition, pp. 121–137). Palgrave Macmillan.
Alder, J., & Syrett, K. (2017c). Underlying Politcal Traditions. In Constitutional and Administrative Law: Vol. Palgrave Law Masters (11th Edition, pp. 26–54). Palgrave Macmillan.
Ali v United Kingdom: Article 6(1) ECHR and Administrative Decision-Making | Public Law for Everyone. (n.d.). https://publiclawforeveryone.com/2016/03/13/ali-v-united-kingdom-article-61-echr-and-administrative-decision-making/
Allan, T. R. S. (2002). The Constitutional Foundations of Judicial Review: Conceptual Conundrum or Interpretative Inquiry? The Cambridge Law Journal, 61(1), 87–125. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000819730200154X
Allan, T. R. S. (2003). Constitutional Dialogue and the Justification of Judicial Review. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 23(4). https://www.jstor.org/stable/3600687
Allan, T. R. S. (2005a). Constitutional Justice: A Liberal Theory of the Rule of Law. Oxford University Press.
Allan, T. R. S. (2005b). Constitutional Justice: A Liberal Theory of the Rule of Law. Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199267880.001.0001
Allan, T. R. S. (2006). Human Rights and Judicial Review: A Critique of "Due Deference”. The Cambridge Law Journal, 65(3), 671–695. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197306007264
Allan, T. R. S. (2011). Judicial Deference and Judicial Review: Legal Doctrine and Legal Theory. Law Quarterly Review, 127(1). https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I38697650034411E088BDC597D432CBAC/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
An Application by Siobhan Mclaughlin for Judicial Review [2016] NICA 53. (n.d.). https://judiciaryni.uk/sites/judiciary/files/decisions/McLaughlin%27s%20%28Siobhan%29%20Application.pdf
Arvind, T. T. (2017). The Curious Origins of Judicial Review. Law Quarterly Review, 91–117. https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I17F84060BE0811E689319702776550D2/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
Atrill, S. (2003). WHO IS THE "FAIR-MINDED AND INFORMED OBSERVER”? BIAS AFTER. The Cambridge Law Journal, 62(2), 279–289. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197303006317
Attorney General v Jonathan Cape Ltd [1976] QB 752. http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=http%3A%2F%2Fidp.rhul.ac.uk%2Foala&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI694B9730E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
Bamforth, N. (1997). Fairness and Legitimate Expectation in Judicial Review. The Cambridge Law Journal, 56(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197300017530
Barber, N. W. (2001a). Prelude to the Separation of Powers. The Cambridge Law Journal, 60(1), 59–88. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197301000629
Barber, N. W. (2001b). Review: The Academic Mythologians. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 21(2). https://www.jstor.org/stable/20468373
Barber, N. W. (2009a). Laws and Constitutional Conventions. Law Quarterly Review, 125, 294–309. http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=http%3A%2F%2Fidp.rhul.ac.uk%2Foala&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI69EDD0210ACD11DE953BC0C525628E94%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
Barber, N. W. (2009b). Laws and Constitutional Conventions. Law Quarterly Review, 294–309. https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I69EDD0210ACD11DE953BC0C525628E94/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
Bingham, T. H. (2011). The Rule of Law. Penguin.
Blake, N. (2002). Importing Proportionality: Clarification or Confusion. European Human Rights Law Review, 19–27. https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I84B178A0E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
Blog | UK Constitutional Law Association | affiliated to the International Association of Constitutional Law. (n.d.). https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/blog/
British and Irish Legal Information Institute. (n.d.). http://www.bailii.org/
British Railways Board v Pickin [1974] AC 765. http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/1974/1.html
Campbell, N. R. (1994). The Duty to Give Reasons in Administrative Law. Public Law, 184–191. https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/ID39F4B20E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
Chan, C. (2016). A Preliminary Framework for Measuring Deference in Rights Reasoning. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 14(4), 851–882. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mow058
Clayton, R. (2015). The Empire Strikes Back: Common Law Rights and the Human Rights Act. Public Law, 3–12. http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=http%3A%2F%2Fidp.rhul.ac.uk%2Foala&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FIAD111C107B4F11E499B9D6E1F6E110C8%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
Constitution Committee | UK Parliament. (n.d.). http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/lords-select/constitution-committee/
Council of Civil Service Unions v Minister for the Civil Service [1985] AC 374. http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/1984/9.html
Craig, P. (1997). Formal and Substantive Conceptions of the Rule of Law: An Analytical Framework. Public Law, 467–487.
Craig, P. (1998). Ultra Vires and the Foundations of Judicial Review. The Cambridge Law Journal, 57(1), 63–90. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197300134397
Craig, P. (1999). Competing Models of Judicial Review. Public Law, 428–447. https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/ID132DF00E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
Craig, P. (2001). The Courts, the Human Rights Act and Judicial Review. Law Quarterly Review, 589–603. https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I848E3930E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
Craig, P. (2003). The Human Rights Act, Article 6 and Procedural Rights. Public Law, 753–773. https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I84890911E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
Craig, P. (2011). Political Constitutionalism and the Judicial Role: A Response. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 9(1), 112–131. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mor025
Craig, P. (2013). The Nature of Reasonableness Review. Current Legal Problems, 66(1), 131–167. https://doi.org/10.1093/clp/cut010
Craig, P., & Schonberg, S. (2000). Substantive Legitimate Expectations After Coughlan. Public Law, 684–701. https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I84A4F580E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
Craig, R. (2017). A Simple Application of the Frustration Principle: Prerogative, Statute and Miller. Public Law. http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=http%3A%2F%2Fidp.rhul.ac.uk%2Foala&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI8106D680C87411E79CFEFF663275FD29%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
Daly, P. (2010). Justiciability and the ‘Political Question’ Doctrine. Public Law, 160–178. http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=http%3A%2F%2Fidp.rhul.ac.uk%2Foala&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI14A4A19044F511E88D34E20E69C76312%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
Delegated Legislation | UK Parliament. (n.d.). https://www.parliament.uk/about/how/laws/delegated/
Elliot, M., & Thomas, R. (2017). Themes, Sources, and Principles. In Public Law (3rd edn). Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198765899.001.0001
Elliott, M. (n.d.). Mark Elliott: Justification, Calibration and Substantive Judicial Review: Putting Doctrine in its Place | UK Constitutional Law Association. https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2013/09/17/mark-elliott-justification-calibration-and-substantive-judicial-review-putting-doctrine-in-its-place/
Elliott, M. (1999). The Demise of Parliamentary Sovereignty? the Implications for Justifying Judicial Review. Law Quarterly Review, 119–137. https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/ICCCA7BD0E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
Elliott, M. (2006). Legitimate Expectations: Procedure, Substance, Policy and Proportionality. The Cambridge Law Journal, 65(2), 254–256. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197306227119
Elliott, M. (2012). The Appearance of Bias, the Fair-Minded and Informed Observer, and the "Ordinary Person in Queen Square Market”. The Cambridge Law Journal, 71(2), 247–250. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197312000372
Elliott, M. (2015a). A Tangled Constitutional Web: The Black-Spider Memos and the British Constitution’s Relational Architecture. Public Law, 539–550. http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=http%3A%2F%2Fidp.rhul.ac.uk%2Foala&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI3A34F4805C5611E58916B963212E7CCD%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
Elliott, M. (2015b). The Principle of Parliamentary Sovereignty in Legal, Constitutional, and Political Perspective. In J. L. Jowell, D. Oliver, & C. O’Cinneide (Eds.), The Changing Constitution (8th Edition, pp. 38–66). Oxford University Press.
Elliott, M. (2018). Judicial Power and the United Kingdom’s Changing Constitution | Public Law for Everyone. https://publiclawforeveryone.com/2017/10/31/judicial-power-and-the-united-kingdoms-changing-constitution/
Elliott, M., & Thomas, R. (2017a). Public Law (3rd Edition). Oxford University Press.
Elliott, M., & Thomas, R. (2017b). Public Law (3rd edn). Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198765899.001.0001
Elliott, M., & Thomas, R. (2017c). Themes, Sources, and Principles. In Public Law (3rd Edition, pp. 36–86). Oxford University Press.
European Court of Human Rights. (n.d.). http://www.echr.coe.int/Pages/home.aspx?p=home
Exercise of Discretion in Administrative Decision-Making. (n.d.). http://www.ombudsman.wa.gov.au/Publications/Documents/guidelines/Exercise-of-discretion-in-admin-decision-making.pdf
Feldman, D. (2005). None, One or Several? Perspectives on the UK’s Constitution(s). The Cambridge Law Journal, 64(2), 329–351. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197305006884
Fenwick, H. (2002). The Anti–Terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001: A Proportionate Response to 11 September? The Modern Law Review, 65(5), 724–762. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.00405
Ferreira, N. (2015). The Supreme Court in a Final Push to Go Beyond Strasbourg. Public Law. http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=http%3A%2F%2Fidp.rhul.ac.uk%2Foala&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI5409B340105311E5995D9B4942D36284%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
Forsyth, C. (1996). Of Fig Leaves and Fairy Tales: The Ultra Vires Doctrine, the Sovereignty of Parliament and Judicial Review. The Cambridge Law Journal, 55(1), 122–140. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197300097762
Forsyth, C., & Elliott, M. (2003). The Legitimacy of Judicial Review. Public Law, 286–307. https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I795AA3A0E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
Gavin Phillipson: Historic Commons Syria Vote: The Constitutional Significance (Part I) | UK Constitutional Law Association. (n.d.). https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2013/09/19/gavin-phillipson-historic-commons-syria-vote-the-constitutional-significance-part-i/
Gavin Phillipson: Historic Commons Syria Vote: The Constitutional Significance. Part II the Way Forward | UK Constitutional Law Association. (n.d.). https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2013/11/29/gavin-phillipson-historic-commons-syria-vote-the-constitutional-significance-part-ii-the-way-forward/
Gee, G., & Webber, G. C. N. (2010). What Is a Political Constitution? Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 30(2), 273–299. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqq013
Ghaidan v. Godin-Mendoza [2004] UKHL 30. http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2004/30.html
Goldsworthy, J. (2003). Homogenizing Constitutions. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 23(3), 483–505. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/23.3.483
Gordon, M. (2015). Parliamentary Sovereignty in the UK Constitution: Process, Politics and Democracy: Vol. v. 4. Hart Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781474201667
Gregson, R. (2017). When Should There Be an Implied Power to Delegate? Public Law, 408–425. https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IB5E035E04C6411E79A6EF925F51871C7/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
Hale, B. (2012). Argentoratum Locutum: Is Strasbourg or the Supreme Court Supreme? Human Rights Law Review, 12(1), 65–78. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngs001
Hale, Lady. (2015). ‘The UK Supreme Court in the UK Constitution’ (Inaugural Lecture at the Institute for Legal and Constitutional Research, University of St Andrews, 8th of October 2015 (pp. 1–17). https://www.supremecourt.uk/docs/speech-151008.pdf
Hickman, T. (2008). The Substance and Structure of Proportionality. Public Law, 694–716. https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I010EBB7099A111DD9611E019A6BFBE26/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
Hilson, C. (2002). Judicial Review, Policies and the Fettering of Discretion. Public Law, 111–129. https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/ID10F7880E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
Human Rights Act 1998. http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=http%3A%2F%2Fidp.rhul.ac.uk%2Foala&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI5FB840F0E42311DAA7CF8F68F6EE57AB%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
In the Matter of an Application by Siobhan McLaughlin for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland) [2018] UKSC 48. (n.d.). https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uksc-2017-0035-judgment.pdf
International Journal of Constitutional Law. (n.d.). https://librarysearch.royalholloway.ac.uk/permalink/44ROY_INST/16u3s8/alma997000681902671
Jackson & Ors v. Her Majesty’s Attorney General [2005] UKHL 56. http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2005/56.html
Jackson & Ors v. Her Majesty’s Attorney General [2005] UKHL 56. http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2005/56.html
Jaconelli, J. (2005a). Do Constitutional Conventions Bind? The Cambridge Law Journal, 64(1), 149–176. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197305006823
Jaconelli, J. (2005b). Do Constitutional Conventions Bind? The Cambridge Law Journal, 64(1), 149–176. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197305006823
Jones, B. C. (2016). Preliminary Warnings on ‘Constitutional’ Idolatry. Public Law, 74–92. https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IE932C1D09A7F11E5ACC99E2443923C19/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
Jowell, J. (1999). Of Vires and Vacuums: The Constitutional Context of Judicial Review. Public Law, 448–460. https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/ID1392090E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
Jowell, J. (2006). Parliamentary Sovereignty Under the New Constitutional Hypothesis. Public Law, 562–579.
Jowell, J., & Lester, A. (1988). Beyond Wednesbury: Substantive Principles of Administrative Law. Commonwealth Law Bulletin, 14(2), 858–870. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050718.1988.9985971
Kavanaugh, A. (2010). Defending Deference in Public Law and Constitutional Theory. Law Quarterly Review, 222. https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IF3B510D22E5211DFBE2FA967ED04D069/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
Knight, C. J. S. (2009). A Framework for Fettering. Judicial Review, 14(1), 73–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/10854681.2009.11426590
Le Sueur, A. P. (1999). Legal Duties to Give Reasons. Current Legal Problems, 52(1), 150–172. https://doi.org/10.1093/clp/52.1.150
Le Sueur, A. P., Sunkin, M., & Murkens, J. E. (2016). Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials (3rd Edition). Oxford University Press.
Le Sueur, A. P., Sunkin, M., & Murkens, J. E. (2019). Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials (4th edn). Oxford University Press. http://doi.org.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/10.1093/he/9780198820284.001.0001
Legal Studies: The Journal of the Society of Legal Scholars. (n.d.). https://librarysearch.royalholloway.ac.uk/permalink/44ROY_INST/16u3s8/alma997017693302671
Lever, A. (2007). Is Judicial Review Undemocratic? Public Law, 280–298. https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I25BAEDE0E30911DB9628FD37664FF158/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
Liversidge v Anderson [1941] UKHL 1. http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/1941/1.html
Lord Lester of Herne Hill. (2001). Developing Constitutional Principles of Public Law. Public Law, 684–694. https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I849E17B0E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
Loveland, I. (2003). Does Homelessness Decision Making Engage Article 6(1) of the European Convention on Human Rights? European Human Rights Law Review, 176–204. https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I7E856C70E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
Loveland, I. (2015). Human Rights II: Emergent Principles. In Constitutional Law, Administrative Law, and Human Rights: A Critical Introduction (7th Edition, pp. 588–615). Oxford University Press.
Loveland, I. (2018). Human Rights II: Emergent Principles. In Constitutional Law, Administrative Law, and Human Rights: A Critical Introduction (8th edn). Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198804680.001.0001
Loveland, I. (2021a). Constitutional Law, Administrative Law, and Human Rights: A Critical Introduction (9th Edition). Oxford University Press.
Loveland, I. (2021b). Constitutional Law, Administrative Law, and Human Rights: A Critical Introduction (9th Edition). Oxford University Press.
Malleson, K. (2000). Judicial Bias and Disqualification After Pinochet (No. 2). Modern Law Review, 63(1), 119–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.00254
Mark Elliot: Reflections on the HS2 Case: A Hierarchy of Domestic Constitutional Norms and the Qualified Primacy of EU Law | UK Constitutional Law Association. (n.d.). https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2014/01/23/mark-elliot-reflections-on-the-hs2-case-a-hierarchy-of-domestic-constitutional-norms-and-the-qualified-primacy-of-eu-law/
Masterman, R., & Murray, C. (2003). Law, Politics, and the United Kingdom Constitution. In Exploring Constitutional and Administrative Law (pp. 88–108). http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=13409289760002671&institutionId=2671&customerId=2670
Masterman, R., & Murray, C. (2013). Law, Politics, and the United Kingdom Constitution. In Exploring Constitutional and Administrative Law (pp. 88–108). Pearson.
McLoughlin Supreme Court Press Summary. (n.d.). https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uksc-2017-0035-press-summary.pdf
Miller & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union (Rev 3) [2017] UKSC 5. http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKSC/2017/5.html
Murkens, J. E. K. (2018). Democracy as the Legitimating Condition in the UK Constitution. Legal Studies, 38(01), 42–58. https://doi.org/10.1017/lst.2017.10
Nicol, D. (2006). Law and Politics After the Human Rights Act. Public Law, 722–751. http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=http%3A%2F%2Fidp.rhul.ac.uk%2Foala&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI13579C41540511DB85F29853495F842F%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
Norris, M. (1996). Ex Parte Smith: Irrationality and Human Rights. Public Law, 590–600. https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/ID37F6710E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
Oliver, D. (1987). Is the Ultra Vires Rule the Basis of Judicial Review? Public Law, 543–569. https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/ID3D7E750E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
Olowofoyeku, A. A. (2000). The Nemo Judex Rule: The Case Against Automatic Disqualification. Public Law, 456–475. https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/ID12EE760E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
Olowofoyeku, A. A. (2009). Bias and the Informed Observer: A Call for a Return to Gough. The Cambridge Law Journal, 68(2), 388–409. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197309000373
Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. (n.d.). https://librarysearch.royalholloway.ac.uk/permalink/44ROY_INST/70508m/alma997001809702671
Perry, A., & Tucker, A. (2018). Top-Down Constitutional Conventions. The Modern Law Review, 81(5), 765–789. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12364
Phillipson, G. (n.d.-a). ‘Historic’ Commons’ Syria Vote: The Constitutional Significance. Part I | UK Constitutional Law Association. https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2013/09/19/gavin-phillipson-historic-commons-syria-vote-the-constitutional-significance-part-i/
Phillipson, G. (n.d.-b). "Historic” Commons’ Syria Vote: The Constitutional Significance. Part II | the Way Forward – UK Constitutional Law Association. https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2013/11/29/gavin-phillipson-historic-commons-syria-vote-the-constitutional-significance-part-ii-the-way-forward/
Political and Constitutional Reform Committee | UK Parliament. (n.d.). http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/political-and-constitutional-reform-committee/
Poole, T. (2005). Of Headscarves and Heresies: The Denbigh High School Case and Public Authority Decision-Making Under the Human Rights Act. Public Law, 685–695. https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I848A1A80E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
Poole, T. (2009). The Reformation of English Administrative Law. The Cambridge Law Journal, 68(1), 142–168. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197309000063
Principles of Good Administration | Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman (PHSO). (n.d.). https://www.ombudsman.org.uk/about-us/our-principles/principles-good-administration
Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee | UK Parliament. (n.d.). http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/public-administration-and-constitutional-affairs-committee/
Public Law. (n.d.). https://uk.westlaw.com/WestlawUk/Journals/Publications/Public-Law
R (Chester) v Secretary of State for Justice [2013] UKSC 63. http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKSC/2013/63.html
R (Evans) v Attorney General [2015] UKSC 21. http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKSC/2015/21.html
R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5, [40]-[49]. https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/uksc-2016-0196.html
R (on the application of Nicklinson and another) (Appellants) v Ministry of Justice (Respondent) [2014] UKSC 38. https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/uksc-2013-0235.html
Rainey, B., Wicks, E., & Ovey, C. (2014). Context, Background, and Institutions. In Jacobs, White and Ovey: The European Convention on Human Rights (6th Edition, pp. 3–20). Oxford University Press.
Ringhand, L. (2005). Fig Leaves, Fairy Tales, and Constitutional Foundations: Debating Judicial Review in Britain. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 43(3). http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/cjtl43&id=1
Rivers, J. (2006). Proportionality and Variable Intensity of Review. Cambridge Law Journal, 65, 174–207. https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IFB69CD50E72A11DC88EB9BE684C867E2/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
Sales, P. (2013). Rationality, Proportionality and the Development of the Law. Law Quarterly Review, 223–241. https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I69812151881411E2BACCBED531DFD77E/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
Stanton, J., & Prescott, C. (2018a). Judicial Review: Access to Review and Remedies. In Public Law. Oxford University Press.
Stanton, J., & Prescott, C. (2018b). Judicial Review: Access to Review and Remedies. In Public Law. Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198722939.001.0001
Stanton, J., & Prescott, C. (2018c). Judicial Review: Illegality. In Public law. Oxford University Press.
Stanton, J., & Prescott, C. (2018d). Judicial Review: Illegality. In Public Law. Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198722939.001.0001
Stanton, J., & Prescott, C. (2018e). Judicial Review: Irrationality and Proportionality. In Public Law. Oxford University Press.
Stanton, J., & Prescott, C. (2018f). Judicial Review: Irrationality and Proportionality. In Public Law. Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198722939.001.0001
Stanton, J., & Prescott, C. (2018g). Judicial Review: Procedural Impropriety. In Public Law. Oxford University Press.
Stanton, J., & Prescott, C. (2018h). Judicial Review: Procedural Impropriety. In Public Law. Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198722939.001.0001
Stanton, J., & Prescott, C. (2018i). Judicial Review: Procedural Impropriety. In Public Law. Oxford University Press.
Stanton, J., & Prescott, C. (2018j). Judicial Review: Procedural Impropriety. In Public Law. Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198722939.001.0001
Stanton, J., & Prescott, C. (2018k). Public Law. Oxford University Press.
Stanton, J., & Prescott, C. (2018l). The Royal Prerogative and Constitutional Conventions. In Public Law. Oxford University Press.
Stanton, J., & Prescott, C. (2018m). The Royal Prerogative and Constitutional Conventions. In Public Law. Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198722939.001.0001
Stanton, J., Prescott, C., & Mead, D. (2018). Public Law. Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198722939.001.0001
Stark, S. W. (2017). Facing Facts: Judicial Approaches to Section 4 of the Human Rights Act 1998. Law Quarterly Review. http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=http%3A%2F%2Fidp.rhul.ac.uk%2Foala&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI553CB880985E11E7BEB8FD7157D7F73E%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
Supperstone, M., & Coppel, J. (1999). Judicial Review After the Human Rights Act. European Human Rights Law Review, 301–329. https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I84ACE4C0E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
Taming the Prerogative: Strengthening Ministerial Accountability to Parliament. (2003). House of Commons. Public Administration Select Committee. https://parlipapers.proquest.com/parlipapers/result/pqpdocumentview?accountid=11455&groupid=103502&pgId=c5aea05f-b8ed-42b0-b2e6-8c68938d85ec
Taylor, R. B. (2015a). Foundational and Regulatory Conventions: Exploring the Constitutional Significance of Britain’s Dependency Upon Conventions. Public Law, 614–632. http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=http%3A%2F%2Fidp.rhul.ac.uk%2Foala&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI3A36A2305C5611E58916B963212E7CCD%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
Taylor, R. B. (2015b). Foundational and Regulatory Conventions: Exploring the Constitutional Significance of Britain’s Dependency Upon Conventions. Public Law, 614–632. https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I3A36A2305C5611E58916B963212E7CCD/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
The Cambridge Law Journal. (n.d.). https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/cambridge-law-journal
The Constitution Unit Blog. (n.d.). https://constitution-unit.com/
The Law Quarterly Review. (n.d.).
The Modern Law Review. (n.d.). https://librarysearch.royalholloway.ac.uk/permalink/44ROY_INST/16u3s8/alma997003019902671
Tomkins, A. (2002). In Defence of the Political Constitution. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 22(1), 157–175. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/22.1.157
Tomlinson and Others v Birmingham City Council [2010] UKSC 8. (n.d.-a). https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uksc-2009-0050-judgment.pdf
Tomlinson and Others v Birmingham City Council [2010] UKSC 8. (n.d.-b). https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uksc-2009-0050-judgment.pdf
Tomlinson, J. (2017). The Narrow Approach to Substantive Legitimate Expectations and the Trend of Modern Authority. Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal, 17(1), 75–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/14729342.2017.1311514
Turner, I. (2009). Irrationality, the Human Rights Act and the Limits of Merits-Review. Nottingham Law Journal, 18, 18–36. https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IC5A4DCE02B5711E08221F700C27502AE/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
UK Constitutional Law Association Blog | International Association of Constitutional Law. (n.d.). https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/blog/
UK Human Rights Blog. (n.d.). https://ukhumanrightsblog.com/
UK Parliament. (n.d.). http://www.parliament.uk/
Unmarried Mother Siobhan McLaughlin Wins Supreme Court Benefit Case | BBC. (2018). https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-45355028
Unmarried Mother Wins Supreme Court Fight for Widowed Parents’ Allowance | Good Morning Britain | YouTube. (n.d.). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cs4viID3KWI
Varuhas, J. N. E. (2013a). The Reformation of English Administrative Law? "Rights”, Rhetoric and Reality. The Cambridge Law Journal, 72(2), 369–413. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197313000500
Varuhas, J. N. E. (2013b). The Reformation of English Administrative Law? "Rights”, Rhetoric and Reality. The Cambridge Law Journal, 72(2), 369–413. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197313000500
Waldron, J. (2006). The Core of the Case Against Judicial Review. The Yale Law Journal, 115(6). https://doi.org/10.2307/20455656
Walker, P. (1995). What’s Wrong With Irrationality? Public Law, 556–576. https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/ID3967180E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
Watson, J. (2010). Clarity and Ambiguity: A New Approach to the Test of Legitimacy in the Law of Legitimate Expectations. Legal Studies, 30(4), 633–652. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-121X.2010.00177.x
Webley, L., & Samuels, H. (2015a). Human Rights. In Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials: Vol. Complete (3rd Edition, pp. 255–290). Oxford University Press.
Webley, L., & Samuels, H. (2015b). Human Rights. In Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials: Vol. Complete (3rd Edition, pp. 255–290). Oxford University Press.
Webley, L., & Samuels, H. (2015c). Parliamentary Supremacy: The Theory. In Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials: Vol. Complete (3rd Edition, pp. 185–226). Oxford University Press.
Webley, L., & Samuels, H. (2015d). The Crown Royal Perogative. In Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials: Vol. Complete (3rd Edition, pp. 145–182). Oxford University Press.
Webley, L., & Samuels, H. (2015e). The Role of Constitutional Conventions. In Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials: Vol. Complete (3rd Edition, pp. 365–393). Oxford University Press.
Webley, L., & Samuels, H. (2015f). The Rule of Law. In Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials: Vol. Complete (3rd Edition, pp. 77–113). Oxford University Press.
Webley, L., & Samuels, H. (2018a). ‘Constitutional Organisations, Institutions and Roles’ and ‘The Nature of the British Constitution’. In Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials: Vol. Complete (3rd Edition, pp. 13–15). Oxford University Press.
Webley, L., & Samuels, H. (2018b). ‘Constitutional Organisations, Institutions and Roles’ and ‘The Nature of the British Constitution’. In Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials (4th edn). Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198798064.001.0001
Webley, L., & Samuels, H. (2018c). Human Rights. In Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials (4th edn). Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198798064.001.0001
Webley, L., & Samuels, H. (2018d). Human Rights. In Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials (4th edn). Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198798064.001.0001
Webley, L., & Samuels, H. (2018e). Illegality. In Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials (Fourth edition). Oxford University Press.
Webley, L., & Samuels, H. (2018f). Illegality. In Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials (4th edn). Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198798064.001.0001
Webley, L., & Samuels, H. (2018g). Irrationality and Proportionality. In Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials (Fourth edition). Oxford University Press.
Webley, L., & Samuels, H. (2018h). Irrationality and Proportionality. In Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials (4th edn). Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198798064.001.0001
Webley, L., & Samuels, H. (2018i). Parliamentary Supremacy: The Theory. In Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials (4th edn). Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198798064.001.0001
Webley, L., & Samuels, H. (2018j). Procedural Impropriety. In Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials (Fourth edition). Oxford University Press.
Webley, L., & Samuels, H. (2018k). Procedural Impropriety. In Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials (4th edn). Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198798064.001.0001
Webley, L., & Samuels, H. (2018l). Procedural Impropriety. In Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials (Fourth edition). Oxford University Press.
Webley, L., & Samuels, H. (2018m). Procedural Impropriety. In Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials (4th edn). Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198798064.001.0001
Webley, L., & Samuels, H. (2018n). The Crown Royal Perogative. In Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials (4th edn). Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198798064.001.0001
Webley, L., & Samuels, H. (2018o). The Role of Constitutional Conventions. In Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials (4th edn). Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198798064.001.0001
Webley, L., & Samuels, H. (2018p). The Role of Constitutional Conventions. In Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials (Fourth edition). Oxford University Press.
Webley, L., & Samuels, H. (2018q). The Role of Constitutional Conventions. In Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials (4th edn). Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198798064.001.0001
Webley, L., & Samuels, H. (2018r). The Role of the Courts, Judicial Review, and Human Rights. In Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials (Fourth edition). Oxford University Press.
Webley, L., & Samuels, H. (2018s). The Role of the Courts, Judicial Review, and Human Rights. In Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials (4th edn). Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198798064.001.0001
Webley, L., & Samuels, H. (2018t). The Rule of Law. In Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials (4th edn). Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198798064.001.0001
Webley, L., & Samuels, H. (2018u). ‘What is Public Law’ and ‘Constitutional Organisations, Institutions, and Roles’, and ‘The Nature of the British Constitution’. In Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials: Vol. Complete (3rd Edition, pp. 3–76). Oxford University Press.
Webley, L., & Samuels, H. (2018v). What is Public Law’ and ‘Constitutional Organisations, Institutions, and Roles’, and ‘The Nature of the British Constitution’. In Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials (4th edn). Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198798064.001.0001
Webley, L., & Samuels, H. (2021a). Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials (Fifth edition). Oxford University Press.
Webley, L., & Samuels, H. (2021b). Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials (5th Edition). Oxford University Press. https://doi-org.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/10.1093/he/9780198853183.001.0001
Where Next for the Wednesbury Principle? a Brief Response to Lord Carnwath | Public Law for Everyone. (n.d.). https://publiclawforeveryone.com/2013/11/19/where-next-for-the-wednesbury-principle-a-brief-response-to-lord-carnwath/
Williams, D. (2000). Bias; the Judges and the Separation of Powers. Public Law, 45–60. https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/ID1246010E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
Williams, R. (2017). Structuring Substantive Review. Public Law, 99–123. https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IF32A9D40BAFC11E695A4FB481AEC10EF/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
Wong, G. (2000). Towards the Nutcracker Principle: Reconsidering the Objections to Proportionality. Public Law, 92–109. https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/ID1301FE1E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
Young, A. L. (2011). Is Dialogue Working Under the Human Rights Act 1998? Public Law, 773–800. http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=http%3A%2F%2Fidp.rhul.ac.uk%2Foala&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FID7EAF690E23C11E080A9C399189E1576%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
Young, A. L. (2014). Will You, Won’t You, Will You Join the Deference Dance? Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 34(2), 375–394. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqu004
