Ahmed, Farrah, and Adam Perry. 2014. ‘The Coherence of the Doctrine of Legitimate Expectations’. The Cambridge Law Journal 73(1):61–85. doi: 10.1017/S0008197314000026.
Ahmed, Farrah, and Adam Perry. 2016. ‘Constitutional Statutes’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. doi: 10.1093/ojls/gqw030.
Alder, John, and Keith Syrett. 2017a. Constitutional and Administrative Law. Vol. Palgrave Law Masters. 11th Edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Alder, John, and Keith Syrett. 2017b. ‘The Rule of Law’. Pp. 121–37 in Constitutional and Administrative Law. Vol. Palgrave Law Masters. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Alder, John, and Keith Syrett. 2017c. ‘Underlying Politcal Traditions’. Pp. 26–54 in Constitutional and Administrative Law. Vol. Palgrave Law Masters. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Allan, T. R. S. 2002. ‘The Constitutional Foundations of Judicial Review: Conceptual Conundrum or Interpretative Inquiry?’ The Cambridge Law Journal 61(1):87–125. doi: 10.1017/S000819730200154X.
Allan, T. R. S. 2003. ‘Constitutional Dialogue and the Justification of Judicial Review’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 23(4).
Allan, T. R. S. 2005a. Constitutional Justice: A Liberal Theory of the Rule of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Allan, T. R. S. 2005b. Constitutional Justice: A Liberal Theory of the Rule of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Allan, T. R. S. 2006. ‘Human Rights and Judicial Review: A Critique of "Due Deference”’. The Cambridge Law Journal 65(3):671–95. doi: 10.1017/S0008197306007264.
Allan, T. R. S. 2011. ‘Judicial Deference and Judicial Review: Legal Doctrine and Legal Theory’. Law Quarterly Review 127(1).
Anon. 2003. ‘Taming the Prerogative: Strengthening Ministerial Accountability to Parliament’. 422:3–17. Retrieved (https://parlipapers.proquest.com/parlipapers/result/pqpdocumentview?accountid=11455&groupid=103502&pgId=c5aea05f-b8ed-42b0-b2e6-8c68938d85ec).
Anon. 2018. ‘Unmarried Mother Siobhan McLaughlin Wins Supreme Court Benefit Case | BBC’. Retrieved (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-45355028).
Anon. n.d.-a. ‘Ali v United Kingdom: Article 6(1) ECHR and Administrative Decision-Making | Public Law for Everyone’. Retrieved (https://publiclawforeveryone.com/2016/03/13/ali-v-united-kingdom-article-61-echr-and-administrative-decision-making/).
Anon. n.d.-b. ‘An Application by Siobhan Mclaughlin for Judicial Review [2016] NICA 53’.
Anon. n.d.-c. Attorney General v Jonathan Cape Ltd [1976] QB 752.
Anon. n.d.-d. ‘Blog | UK Constitutional Law Association | Affiliated to the International Association of Constitutional Law’. Retrieved (https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/blog/).
Anon. n.d.-e. ‘British and Irish Legal Information Institute’. Retrieved (http://www.bailii.org/).
Anon. n.d.-f. British Railways Board v Pickin [1974] AC 765.
Anon. n.d.-g. ‘Constitution Committee | UK Parliament’. Retrieved (http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/lords-select/constitution-committee/).
Anon. n.d.-h. Council of Civil Service Unions v Minister for the Civil Service [1985] AC 374.
Anon. n.d.-i. ‘Delegated Legislation | UK Parliament’. Retrieved (https://www.parliament.uk/about/how/laws/delegated/).
Anon. n.d.-j. ‘European Court of Human Rights’. Retrieved (http://www.echr.coe.int/Pages/home.aspx?p=home).
Anon. n.d.-k. ‘Exercise of Discretion in Administrative Decision-Making’.
Anon. n.d.-l. ‘Gavin Phillipson: Historic Commons Syria Vote: The Constitutional Significance (Part I) | UK Constitutional Law Association’. Retrieved (https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2013/09/19/gavin-phillipson-historic-commons-syria-vote-the-constitutional-significance-part-i/).
Anon. n.d.-m. ‘Gavin Phillipson: Historic Commons Syria Vote: The Constitutional Significance. Part II the Way Forward | UK Constitutional Law Association’. Retrieved (https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2013/11/29/gavin-phillipson-historic-commons-syria-vote-the-constitutional-significance-part-ii-the-way-forward/).
Anon. n.d.-n. Ghaidan v. Godin-Mendoza [2004] UKHL 30.
Anon. n.d.-o. Human Rights Act 1998.
Anon. n.d.-p. ‘In the Matter of an Application by Siobhan McLaughlin for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland) [2018] UKSC 48’.
Anon. n.d.-q. ‘International Journal of Constitutional Law’.
Anon. n.d.-r. Jackson & Ors v. Her Majesty’s Attorney General [2005] UKHL 56.
Anon. n.d.-s. Jackson & Ors v. Her Majesty’s Attorney General [2005] UKHL 56.
Anon. n.d.-t. ‘Legal Studies: The Journal of the Society of Legal Scholars’.
Anon. n.d.-u. Liversidge v Anderson [1941] UKHL 1.
Anon. n.d.-v. ‘Mark Elliot: Reflections on the HS2 Case: A Hierarchy of Domestic Constitutional Norms and the Qualified Primacy of EU Law | UK Constitutional Law Association’. Retrieved (https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2014/01/23/mark-elliot-reflections-on-the-hs2-case-a-hierarchy-of-domestic-constitutional-norms-and-the-qualified-primacy-of-eu-law/).
Anon. n.d.-w. ‘McLoughlin Supreme Court Press Summary’.
Anon. n.d.-x. Miller & Anor, R (on the Application of) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union (Rev 3) [2017] UKSC 5.
Anon. n.d.-y. ‘Oxford Journal of Legal Studies’.
Anon. n.d.-z. ‘Political and Constitutional Reform Committee | UK Parliament’. Retrieved (http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/political-and-constitutional-reform-committee/).
Anon. n.d.-aa. ‘​Principles of Good Administration | Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman (PHSO)’. Retrieved (https://www.ombudsman.org.uk/about-us/our-principles/principles-good-administration).
Anon. n.d.-ab. ‘Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee | UK Parliament’. Retrieved (http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/public-administration-and-constitutional-affairs-committee/).
Anon. n.d.-ac. ‘Public Law’.
Anon. n.d.-ad. R (Chester) v Secretary of State for Justice [2013] UKSC 63.
Anon. n.d.-ae. R (Evans) v Attorney General [2015] UKSC 21.
Anon. n.d.-af. R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5, [40]-[49].
Anon. n.d.-ag. R (on the Application of Nicklinson and Another) (Appellants) v Ministry of Justice (Respondent) [2014] UKSC 38.
Anon. n.d.-ah. ‘The Cambridge Law Journal’.
Anon. n.d.-ai. ‘The Constitution Unit Blog’. Retrieved (https://constitution-unit.com/).
Anon. n.d.-aj. ‘The Law Quarterly Review’.
Anon. n.d.-ak. ‘The Modern Law Review’.
Anon. n.d.-al. ‘Tomlinson and Others v Birmingham City Council  [2010] UKSC 8’.
Anon. n.d.-am. ‘Tomlinson and Others v Birmingham City Council  [2010] UKSC 8’.
Anon. n.d.-an. ‘UK Constitutional Law Association Blog | International Association of Constitutional Law’. Retrieved (https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/blog/).
Anon. n.d.-ao. ‘UK Human Rights Blog’. Retrieved (https://ukhumanrightsblog.com/).
Anon. n.d.-ap. ‘UK Parliament’. Retrieved (http://www.parliament.uk/).
Anon. n.d.-aq. ‘Unmarried Mother Wins Supreme Court Fight for Widowed Parents’ Allowance | Good Morning Britain | YouTube’.
Anon. n.d.-ar. ‘Where Next for the Wednesbury Principle? A Brief Response to Lord Carnwath | Public Law for Everyone’. Retrieved (https://publiclawforeveryone.com/2013/11/19/where-next-for-the-wednesbury-principle-a-brief-response-to-lord-carnwath/).
Arvind, T. T. 2017. ‘The Curious Origins of Judicial Review’. Law Quarterly Review 91–117.
Atrill, Simon. 2003. ‘WHO IS THE "FAIR-MINDED AND INFORMED OBSERVER”? BIAS AFTER’. The Cambridge Law Journal 62(2):279–89. doi: 10.1017/S0008197303006317.
Bamforth, Nicholas. 1997. ‘Fairness and Legitimate Expectation in Judicial Review’. The Cambridge Law Journal 56(1):1–4. doi: 10.1017/S0008197300017530.
Barber, N. W. 2001a. ‘Prelude to the Separation of Powers’. The Cambridge Law Journal 60(1):59–88. doi: 10.1017/S0008197301000629.
Barber, N. W. 2001b. ‘Review: The Academic Mythologians’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 21(2).
Barber, N. W. 2009a. ‘Laws and Constitutional Conventions’. Law Quarterly Review 125:294–309.
Barber, N. W. 2009b. ‘Laws and Constitutional Conventions’. Law Quarterly Review 294–309.
Bingham, T. H. 2011. The Rule of Law. London: Penguin.
Blake, Nicholas. 2002. ‘Importing Proportionality: Clarification or Confusion’. European Human Rights Law Review 19–27.
Campbell, N. R. 1994. ‘The Duty to Give Reasons in Administrative Law’. Public Law 184–91.
Chan, Cora. 2016. ‘A Preliminary Framework for Measuring Deference in Rights Reasoning’. International Journal of Constitutional Law 14(4):851–82. doi: 10.1093/icon/mow058.
Clayton, Richard. 2015. ‘The Empire Strikes Back: Common Law Rights and the Human Rights Act’. Public Law 3–12.
Craig, P. 2011. ‘Political Constitutionalism and the Judicial Role: A Response’. International Journal of Constitutional Law 9(1):112–31. doi: 10.1093/icon/mor025.
Craig, P. 2013. ‘The Nature of Reasonableness Review’. Current Legal Problems 66(1):131–67. doi: 10.1093/clp/cut010.
Craig, Paul. 1997. ‘Formal and Substantive Conceptions of the Rule of Law: An Analytical Framework’. Public Law 467–87.
Craig, Paul. 1998. ‘Ultra Vires and the Foundations of Judicial Review’. The Cambridge Law Journal 57(1):63–90. doi: 10.1017/S0008197300134397.
Craig, Paul. 1999. ‘Competing Models of Judicial Review’. Public Law 428–47.
Craig, Paul. 2001. ‘The Courts, the Human Rights Act and Judicial Review’. Law Quarterly Review 589–603.
Craig, Paul. 2003. ‘The Human Rights Act, Article 6 and Procedural Rights’. Public Law 753–73.
Craig, Paul, and Soren Schonberg. 2000. ‘Substantive Legitimate Expectations After Coughlan’. Public Law 684–701.
Craig, Robert. 2017. ‘A Simple Application of the Frustration Principle: Prerogative, Statute and Miller’. Public Law.
Daly, Paul. 2010. ‘Justiciability and the “Political Question” Doctrine’. Public Law 160–78.
Elliot, Mark, and Robert Thomas. 2017. ‘Themes, Sources, and Principles’. in Public Law. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press.
Elliott, Mark. 1999. ‘The Demise of Parliamentary Sovereignty? The Implications for Justifying Judicial Review’. Law Quarterly Review 119–37.
Elliott, Mark. 2006. ‘Legitimate Expectations: Procedure, Substance, Policy and Proportionality’. The Cambridge Law Journal 65(2):254–56. doi: 10.1017/S0008197306227119.
Elliott, Mark. 2012. ‘The Appearance of Bias, the Fair-Minded and Informed Observer, and the "Ordinary Person in Queen Square Market”’. The Cambridge Law Journal 71(2):247–50. doi: 10.1017/S0008197312000372.
Elliott, Mark. 2015a. ‘A Tangled Constitutional Web: The Black-Spider Memos and the British Constitution’s Relational Architecture’. Public Law 539–50.
Elliott, Mark. 2015b. ‘The Principle of Parliamentary Sovereignty in Legal, Constitutional, and Political Perspective’. Pp. 38–66 in The Changing Constitution, edited by J. L. Jowell, D. Oliver, and C. O’Cinneide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Elliott, Mark. 2018. ‘Judicial Power and the United Kingdom’s Changing Constitution | Public Law for Everyone’. Retrieved (https://publiclawforeveryone.com/2017/10/31/judicial-power-and-the-united-kingdoms-changing-constitution/).
Elliott, Mark. n.d. ‘Mark Elliott: Justification, Calibration and Substantive Judicial Review: Putting Doctrine in Its Place | UK Constitutional Law Association’. Retrieved (https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2013/09/17/mark-elliott-justification-calibration-and-substantive-judicial-review-putting-doctrine-in-its-place/).
Elliott, Mark, and Robert Thomas. 2017a. Public Law. 3rd Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Elliott, Mark, and Robert Thomas. 2017b. Public Law. 3rd edn. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press.
Elliott, Mark, and Robert Thomas. 2017c. ‘Themes, Sources, and Principles’. Pp. 36–86 in Public Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Feldman, David. 2005. ‘None, One or Several? Perspectives on the UK’s Constitution(s)’. The Cambridge Law Journal 64(2):329–51. doi: 10.1017/S0008197305006884.
Fenwick, Helen. 2002. ‘The Anti–Terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001: A Proportionate Response to 11 September?’ The Modern Law Review 65(5):724–62. doi: 10.1111/1468-2230.00405.
Ferreira, Nuno. 2015. ‘The Supreme Court in a Final Push to Go Beyond Strasbourg’. Public Law.
Forsyth, Christopher. 1996. ‘Of Fig Leaves and Fairy Tales: The Ultra Vires Doctrine, the Sovereignty of Parliament and Judicial Review’. The Cambridge Law Journal 55(1):122–40. doi: 10.1017/S0008197300097762.
Forsyth, Christopher, and Mark Elliott. 2003. ‘The Legitimacy of Judicial Review’. Public Law 286–307.
Gee, G., and G. C. N. Webber. 2010. ‘What Is a Political Constitution?’ Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 30(2):273–99. doi: 10.1093/ojls/gqq013.
Goldsworthy, J. 2003. ‘Homogenizing Constitutions’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 23(3):483–505. doi: 10.1093/ojls/23.3.483.
Gordon, Michael. 2015. Parliamentary Sovereignty in the UK Constitution: Process, Politics and Democracy. Vol. v. 4. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
Gregson, Rory. 2017. ‘When Should There Be an Implied Power to Delegate?’ Public Law 408–25.
Hale, B. 2012. ‘Argentoratum Locutum: Is Strasbourg or the Supreme Court Supreme?’ Human Rights Law Review 12(1):65–78. doi: 10.1093/hrlr/ngs001.
Hale, Lady. 2015. ‘The UK Supreme Court in the UK Constitution’ (Inaugural Lecture at the Institute for Legal and Constitutional Research, University of St Andrews, 8th of October 2015.
Hickman, Tom. 2008. ‘The Substance and Structure of Proportionality’. Public Law 694–716.
Hilson, Chris. 2002. ‘Judicial Review, Policies and the Fettering of Discretion’. Public Law 111–29.
Jaconelli, Joseph. 2005a. ‘Do Constitutional Conventions Bind?’ The Cambridge Law Journal 64(1):149–76. doi: 10.1017/S0008197305006823.
Jaconelli, Joseph. 2005b. ‘Do Constitutional Conventions Bind?’ The Cambridge Law Journal 64(1):149–76. doi: 10.1017/S0008197305006823.
Jones, Brian Christopher. 2016. ‘Preliminary Warnings on “Constitutional” Idolatry’. Public Law 74–92.
Jowell, Jeffrey. 1999. ‘Of Vires and Vacuums: The Constitutional Context of Judicial Review’. Public Law 448–60.
Jowell, Jeffrey. 2006. ‘Parliamentary Sovereignty Under the New Constitutional Hypothesis’. Public Law 562–79.
Jowell, Jeffrey, and Anthony Lester. 1988. ‘Beyond Wednesbury: Substantive Principles of Administrative Law’. Commonwealth Law Bulletin 14(2):858–70. doi: 10.1080/03050718.1988.9985971.
Kavanaugh, Aileen. 2010. ‘Defending Deference in Public Law and Constitutional Theory’. Law Quarterly Review 222.
Knight, C. J. S. 2009. ‘A Framework for Fettering’. Judicial Review 14(1):73–80. doi: 10.1080/10854681.2009.11426590.
Le Sueur, A. P. 1999. ‘Legal Duties to Give Reasons’. Current Legal Problems 52(1):150–72. doi: 10.1093/clp/52.1.150.
Le Sueur, A. P., Maurice Sunkin, and Jo Eric Murkens. 2016. Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 3rd Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Le Sueur, A. P., Maurice Sunkin, and Jo Eric Murkens. 2019. Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 4th edn. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press.
Lever, Annabelle. 2007. ‘Is Judicial Review Undemocratic?’ Public Law 280–98.
Lord Lester of Herne Hill. 2001. ‘Developing Constitutional Principles of Public Law’. Public Law 684–94.
Loveland, Ian. 2003. ‘Does Homelessness Decision Making Engage Article 6(1) of the European Convention on Human Rights?’ European Human Rights Law Review 176–204.
Loveland, Ian. 2015. ‘Human Rights II: Emergent Principles’. Pp. 588–615 in Constitutional Law, Administrative Law, and Human Rights: A Critical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Loveland, Ian. 2018. ‘Human Rights II: Emergent Principles’. in Constitutional Law, Administrative Law, and Human Rights: A Critical Introduction. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press.
Loveland, Ian. 2021a. Constitutional Law, Administrative Law, and Human Rights: A Critical Introduction. 9th Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Loveland, Ian. 2021b. Constitutional Law, Administrative Law, and Human Rights: A Critical Introduction. 9th Edition. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press.
Malleson, Kate. 2000. ‘Judicial Bias and Disqualification After Pinochet (No. 2)’. Modern Law Review 63(1):119–27. doi: 10.1111/1468-2230.00254.
Masterman, Roger, and Colin Murray. 2003. ‘Law, Politics, and the United Kingdom Constitution’. Pp. 88–108 in Exploring Constitutional and Administrative Law.
Masterman, Roger, and Colin Murray. 2013. ‘Law, Politics, and the United Kingdom Constitution’. Pp. 88–108 in Exploring Constitutional and Administrative Law. Harlow, England: Pearson.
Murkens, Jo Eric Khushal. 2018. ‘Democracy as the Legitimating Condition in the UK Constitution’. Legal Studies 38(01):42–58. doi: 10.1017/lst.2017.10.
Nicol, Danny. 2006. ‘Law and Politics After the Human Rights Act’. Public Law 722–51.
Norris, Martin. 1996. ‘Ex Parte Smith: Irrationality and Human Rights’. Public Law 590–600.
Oliver, Dawn. 1987. ‘Is the Ultra Vires Rule the Basis of Judicial Review?’ Public Law 543–69.
Olowofoyeku, Abimbola A. 2000. ‘The Nemo Judex Rule: The Case Against Automatic Disqualification’. Public Law 456–75.
Olowofoyeku, Abimbola A. 2009. ‘Bias and the Informed Observer: A Call for a Return to Gough’. The Cambridge Law Journal 68(2):388–409. doi: 10.1017/S0008197309000373.
Perry, Adam, and Adam Tucker. 2018. ‘Top-Down Constitutional Conventions’. The Modern Law Review 81(5):765–89. doi: 10.1111/1468-2230.12364.
Phillipson, Gavin. n.d.-a. ‘“Historic” Commons’ Syria Vote: The Constitutional Significance. Part I | UK Constitutional Law Association’. Retrieved (https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2013/09/19/gavin-phillipson-historic-commons-syria-vote-the-constitutional-significance-part-i/).
Phillipson, Gavin. n.d.-b. ‘"Historic” Commons’ Syria Vote: The Constitutional Significance. Part II | the Way Forward – UK Constitutional Law Association’. Retrieved (https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2013/11/29/gavin-phillipson-historic-commons-syria-vote-the-constitutional-significance-part-ii-the-way-forward/).
Poole, Thomas. 2005. ‘Of Headscarves and Heresies: The Denbigh High School Case and Public Authority Decision-Making Under the Human Rights Act’. Public Law 685–95.
Poole, Thomas. 2009. ‘The Reformation of English Administrative Law’. The Cambridge Law Journal 68(1):142–68. doi: 10.1017/S0008197309000063.
Rainey, Bernadette, Elizabeth Wicks, and Clare Ovey. 2014. ‘Context, Background, and Institutions’. Pp. 3–20 in Jacobs, White and Ovey: The European Convention on Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ringhand, Lori. 2005. ‘Fig Leaves, Fairy Tales, and Constitutional Foundations: Debating Judicial Review in Britain’. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 43(3).
Rivers, Julian. 2006. ‘Proportionality and Variable Intensity of Review’. Cambridge Law Journal 65:174–207.
Sales, Philip. 2013. ‘Rationality, Proportionality and the Development of the Law’. Law Quarterly Review 223–41.
Stanton, John, and Craig Prescott. 2018a. ‘Judicial Review: Access to Review and Remedies’. in Public Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stanton, John, and Craig Prescott. 2018b. ‘Judicial Review: Access to Review and Remedies’. in Public Law. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press.
Stanton, John, and Craig Prescott. 2018c. ‘Judicial Review: Illegality’. in Public law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stanton, John, and Craig Prescott. 2018d. ‘Judicial Review: Illegality’. in Public Law. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press.
Stanton, John, and Craig Prescott. 2018e. ‘Judicial Review: Irrationality and Proportionality’. in Public Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stanton, John, and Craig Prescott. 2018f. ‘Judicial Review: Irrationality and Proportionality’. in Public Law. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press.
Stanton, John, and Craig Prescott. 2018g. ‘Judicial Review: Procedural Impropriety’. in Public Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stanton, John, and Craig Prescott. 2018h. ‘Judicial Review: Procedural Impropriety’. in Public Law. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press.
Stanton, John, and Craig Prescott. 2018i. ‘Judicial Review: Procedural Impropriety’. in Public Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stanton, John, and Craig Prescott. 2018j. ‘Judicial Review: Procedural Impropriety’. in Public Law. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press.
Stanton, John, and Craig Prescott. 2018k. Public Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stanton, John, and Craig Prescott. 2018l. ‘The Royal Prerogative and Constitutional Conventions’. in Public Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stanton, John, and Craig Prescott. 2018m. ‘The Royal Prerogative and Constitutional Conventions’. in Public Law. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press.
Stanton, John, Craig Prescott, and David Mead. 2018. Public Law. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press.
Stark, Shona Wilson. 2017. ‘Facing Facts: Judicial Approaches to Section 4 of the Human Rights Act 1998’. Law Quarterly Review.
Supperstone, Michael, and Jason Coppel. 1999. ‘Judicial Review After the Human Rights Act’. European Human Rights Law Review 301–29.
Taylor, Robert Brett. 2015a. ‘Foundational and Regulatory Conventions: Exploring the Constitutional Significance of Britain’s Dependency Upon Conventions.’ Public Law 614–32.
Taylor, Robert Brett. 2015b. ‘Foundational and Regulatory Conventions: Exploring the Constitutional Significance of Britain’s Dependency Upon Conventions’. Public Law 614–32.
Tomkins, A. 2002. ‘In Defence of the Political Constitution’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 22(1):157–75. doi: 10.1093/ojls/22.1.157.
Tomlinson, Joe. 2017. ‘The Narrow Approach to Substantive Legitimate Expectations and the Trend of Modern Authority’. Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal 17(1):75–84. doi: 10.1080/14729342.2017.1311514.
Turner, Ian. 2009. ‘Irrationality, the Human Rights Act and the Limits of Merits-Review’. Nottingham Law Journal 18:18–36.
Varuhas, Jason N. E. 2013a. ‘The Reformation of English Administrative Law? "Rights”, Rhetoric and Reality’. The Cambridge Law Journal 72(2):369–413. doi: 10.1017/S0008197313000500.
Varuhas, Jason N. E. 2013b. ‘The Reformation of English Administrative Law? "Rights”, Rhetoric and Reality’. The Cambridge Law Journal 72(2):369–413. doi: 10.1017/S0008197313000500.
Waldron, Jeremy. 2006. ‘The Core of the Case Against Judicial Review’. The Yale Law Journal 115(6). doi: 10.2307/20455656.
Walker, Paul. 1995. ‘What’s Wrong With Irrationality?’ Public Law 556–76.
Watson, Jack. 2010. ‘Clarity and Ambiguity: A New Approach to the Test of Legitimacy in the Law of Legitimate Expectations’. Legal Studies 30(4):633–52. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-121X.2010.00177.x.
Webley, Lisa, and Harriet Samuels. 2015a. ‘Human Rights’. Pp. 255–90 in Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Vol. Complete. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Webley, Lisa, and Harriet Samuels. 2015b. ‘Human Rights’. Pp. 255–90 in Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Vol. Complete. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Webley, Lisa, and Harriet Samuels. 2015c. ‘Parliamentary Supremacy: The Theory’. Pp. 185–226 in Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Vol. Complete. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Webley, Lisa, and Harriet Samuels. 2015d. ‘The Crown Royal Perogative’. Pp. 145–82 in Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Vol. Complete. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Webley, Lisa, and Harriet Samuels. 2015e. ‘The Role of Constitutional Conventions’. Pp. 365–93 in Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Vol. Complete. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Webley, Lisa, and Harriet Samuels. 2015f. ‘The Rule of Law’. Pp. 77–113 in Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Vol. Complete. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Webley, Lisa, and Harriet Samuels. 2018a. ‘“Constitutional Organisations, Institutions and Roles” and “The Nature of the British Constitution”’. Pp. 13–15 in Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Vol. Complete. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Webley, Lisa, and Harriet Samuels. 2018b. ‘“Constitutional Organisations, Institutions and Roles” and “The Nature of the British Constitution”’. in Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press.
Webley, Lisa, and Harriet Samuels. 2018c. ‘Human Rights’. in Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press.
Webley, Lisa, and Harriet Samuels. 2018d. ‘Human Rights’. in Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press.
Webley, Lisa, and Harriet Samuels. 2018e. ‘Illegality’. in Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Webley, Lisa, and Harriet Samuels. 2018f. ‘Illegality’. in Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press.
Webley, Lisa, and Harriet Samuels. 2018g. ‘Irrationality and Proportionality’. in Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Webley, Lisa, and Harriet Samuels. 2018h. ‘Irrationality and Proportionality’. in Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press.
Webley, Lisa, and Harriet Samuels. 2018i. ‘Parliamentary Supremacy: The Theory’. in Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press.
Webley, Lisa, and Harriet Samuels. 2018j. ‘Procedural Impropriety’. in Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Webley, Lisa, and Harriet Samuels. 2018k. ‘Procedural Impropriety’. in Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press.
Webley, Lisa, and Harriet Samuels. 2018l. ‘Procedural Impropriety’. in Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Webley, Lisa, and Harriet Samuels. 2018m. ‘Procedural Impropriety’. in Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press.
Webley, Lisa, and Harriet Samuels. 2018n. ‘The Crown Royal Perogative’. in Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press.
Webley, Lisa, and Harriet Samuels. 2018o. ‘The Role of Constitutional Conventions’. Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials.
Webley, Lisa, and Harriet Samuels. 2018p. ‘The Role of Constitutional Conventions’. in Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Webley, Lisa, and Harriet Samuels. 2018q. ‘The Role of Constitutional Conventions’. in Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press.
Webley, Lisa, and Harriet Samuels. 2018r. ‘The Role of the Courts, Judicial Review, and Human Rights’. in Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Webley, Lisa, and Harriet Samuels. 2018s. ‘The Role of the Courts, Judicial Review, and Human Rights’. in Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press.
Webley, Lisa, and Harriet Samuels. 2018t. ‘The Rule of Law’. in Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press.
Webley, Lisa, and Harriet Samuels. 2018u. ‘“What Is Public Law” and “Constitutional Organisations, Institutions, and Roles”, and “The Nature of the British Constitution”’. Pp. 3–76 in Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Vol. Complete. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Webley, Lisa, and Harriet Samuels. 2018v. ‘What Is Public Law’ and “Constitutional Organisations, Institutions, and Roles”, and “The Nature of the British Constitution”’. in Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press.
Webley, Lisa, and Harriet Samuels. 2021a. Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Fifth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Webley, Lisa, and Harriet Samuels. 2021b. Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 5th Edition. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press.
Williams, David. 2000. ‘Bias; the Judges and the Separation of Powers’. Public Law 45–60.
Williams, Rebecca. 2017. ‘Structuring Substantive Review’. Public Law 99–123.
Wong, Garreth. 2000. ‘Towards the Nutcracker Principle: Reconsidering the Objections to Proportionality’. Public Law 92–109.
Young, A. L. 2014. ‘Will You, Won’t You, Will You Join the Deference Dance?’ Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 34(2):375–94. doi: 10.1093/ojls/gqu004.
Young, Alison L. 2011. ‘Is Dialogue Working Under the Human Rights Act 1998?’ Public Law 773–800.