Bibliography for LL1001: Public Law BETA

Ahmed, Farrah, and Adam Perry. ‘Constitutional Statutes’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies (2016): n. pag. Web.

---. ‘The Coherence of the Doctrine of Legitimate Expectations’. The Cambridge Law Journal 73.1 (2014): 61–85. Web.

Alder, John, and Keith Syrett. Constitutional and Administrative Law. 11th Edition. Palgrave Law Masters. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017. Print.

---. ‘The Rule of Law’. Constitutional and Administrative Law. 11th Edition. Palgrave Law Masters. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017. 121–137. Print.

---. ‘Underlying Politcal Traditions’. Constitutional and Administrative Law. 11th Edition. Palgrave Law Masters. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017. 26–54. Print.

‘Ali v United Kingdom: Article 6(1) ECHR and Administrative Decision-Making | Public Law for Everyone’. N.p., n.d. Web. <https://publiclawforeveryone.com/2016/03/13/ali-v-united-kingdom-article-61-echr-and-administrative-decision-making/>.

Allan, T. R. S. ‘Constitutional Dialogue and the Justification of Judicial Review’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 23.4 (2003): n. pag. Web. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/3600687>.

---. Constitutional Justice: A Liberal Theory of the Rule of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. Print.

---. Constitutional Justice: A Liberal Theory of the Rule of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. Web. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199267880.001.0001>.

---. ‘Human Rights and Judicial Review: A Critique of "Due Deference”’. The Cambridge Law Journal 65.3 (2006): 671–695. Web.

---. ‘Judicial Deference and Judicial Review: Legal Doctrine and Legal Theory’. Law Quarterly Review 127.1 (2011): n. pag. Web. <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I38697650034411E088BDC597D432CBAC/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>.

Allan, T.R.S. ‘The Constitutional Foundations of Judicial Review: Conceptual Conundrum or Interpretative Inquiry?’ The Cambridge Law Journal 61.1 (2002): 87–125. Web.

‘An Application by Siobhan Mclaughlin for Judicial Review [2016] NICA 53’. Web. <https://judiciaryni.uk/sites/judiciary/files/decisions/McLaughlin%27s%20%28Siobhan%29%20Application.pdf>.

Arvind, T. T. ‘The Curious Origins of Judicial Review’. Law Quarterly Review (2017): 91–117. Web. <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I17F84060BE0811E689319702776550D2/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>.

Atrill, Simon. ‘WHO IS THE "FAIR-MINDED AND INFORMED OBSERVER”? BIAS AFTER’. The Cambridge Law Journal 62.2 (2003): 279–289. Web.

Attorney General v Jonathan Cape Ltd [1976] QB 752. N.p. Web. <http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=http%3A%2F%2Fidp.rhul.ac.uk%2Foala&amp;returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI694B9730E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue>.

Bamforth, Nicholas. ‘Fairness and Legitimate Expectation in Judicial Review’. The Cambridge Law Journal 56.1 (1997): 1–4. Web.

Barber, N. W. ‘Laws and Constitutional Conventions’. Law Quarterly Review 125 (2009): 294–309. Web. <http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=http%3A%2F%2Fidp.rhul.ac.uk%2Foala&amp;returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI69EDD0210ACD11DE953BC0C525628E94%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue>.

---. ‘Laws and Constitutional Conventions’. Law Quarterly Review (2009): 294–309. Web. <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I69EDD0210ACD11DE953BC0C525628E94/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>.

---. ‘Prelude to the Separation of Powers’. The Cambridge Law Journal 60.1 (2001): 59–88. Web.

---. ‘Review: The Academic Mythologians’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 21.2 (2001): n. pag. Web. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/20468373>.

Bingham, T. H. The Rule of Law. London: Penguin, 2011. Print.

Blake, Nicholas. ‘Importing Proportionality: Clarification or Confusion’. European Human Rights Law Review (2002): 19–27. Web. <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I84B178A0E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>.

‘Blog | UK Constitutional Law Association | Affiliated to the International Association of Constitutional Law’. N.p., n.d. Web. <https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/blog/>.

‘British and Irish Legal Information Institute’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://www.bailii.org/>.

British Railways Board v Pickin [1974] AC 765. N.p. Web. <http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/1974/1.html>.

Campbell, N. R. ‘The Duty to Give Reasons in Administrative Law’. Public Law (1994): 184–191. Web. <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/ID39F4B20E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>.

Chan, Cora. ‘A Preliminary Framework for Measuring Deference in Rights Reasoning’. International Journal of Constitutional Law 14.4 (2016): 851–882. Web.

Clayton, Richard. ‘The Empire Strikes Back: Common Law Rights and the Human Rights Act’. Public Law (2015): 3–12. Web. <http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=http%3A%2F%2Fidp.rhul.ac.uk%2Foala&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FIAD111C107B4F11E499B9D6E1F6E110C8%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue>.

‘Constitution Committee | UK Parliament’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/lords-select/constitution-committee/>.

Council of Civil Service Unions v Minister for the Civil Service [1985] AC 374. N.p. Web. <http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/1984/9.html>.

Craig, P. ‘Political Constitutionalism and the Judicial Role: A Response’. International Journal of Constitutional Law 9.1 (2011): 112–131. Web.

---. ‘The Nature of Reasonableness Review’. Current Legal Problems 66.1 (2013): 131–167. Web.

Craig, Paul. ‘Competing Models of Judicial Review’. Public Law (1999): 428–447. Web. <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/ID132DF00E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>.

---. ‘Formal and Substantive Conceptions of the Rule of Law: An Analytical Framework’. Public Law (1997): 467–487. Print.

---. ‘The Courts, the Human Rights Act and Judicial Review’. Law Quarterly Review (2001): 589–603. Web. <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I848E3930E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>.

---. ‘The Human Rights Act, Article 6 and Procedural Rights’. Public Law (2003): 753–773. Web. <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I84890911E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>.

---. ‘Ultra Vires and the Foundations of Judicial Review’. The Cambridge Law Journal 57.1 (1998): 63–90. Web.

Craig, Paul, and Soren Schonberg. ‘Substantive Legitimate Expectations After Coughlan’. Public Law (2000): 684–701. Web. <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I84A4F580E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>.

Craig, Robert. ‘A Simple Application of the Frustration Principle: Prerogative, Statute and Miller’. Public Law (2017): n. pag. Web. <http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=http%3A%2F%2Fidp.rhul.ac.uk%2Foala&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI8106D680C87411E79CFEFF663275FD29%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue>.

Daly, Paul. ‘Justiciability and the “Political Question” Doctrine’. Public Law (2010): 160–178. Web. <http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=http%3A%2F%2Fidp.rhul.ac.uk%2Foala&amp;returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI14A4A19044F511E88D34E20E69C76312%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue>.

‘Delegated Legislation | UK Parliament’. N.p., n.d. Web. <https://www.parliament.uk/about/how/laws/delegated/>.

Elliot, Mark, and Robert Thomas. ‘Themes, Sources, and Principles’. Public Law. 3rd edn. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press, 2017. Web. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198765899.001.0001>.

Elliott, Mark. ‘A Tangled Constitutional Web: The Black-Spider Memos and the British Constitution’s Relational Architecture’. Public Law (2015): 539–550. Web. <http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=http%3A%2F%2Fidp.rhul.ac.uk%2Foala&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI3A34F4805C5611E58916B963212E7CCD%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue>.

---. ‘Judicial Power and the United Kingdom’s Changing Constitution | Public Law for Everyone’. N.p., 2018. Web. <https://publiclawforeveryone.com/2017/10/31/judicial-power-and-the-united-kingdoms-changing-constitution/>.

---. ‘Legitimate Expectations: Procedure, Substance, Policy and Proportionality’. The Cambridge Law Journal 65.2 (2006): 254–256. Web.

---. ‘Mark Elliott: Justification, Calibration and Substantive Judicial Review: Putting Doctrine in Its Place | UK Constitutional Law Association’. N.p., n.d. Web. <https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2013/09/17/mark-elliott-justification-calibration-and-substantive-judicial-review-putting-doctrine-in-its-place/>.

---. ‘The Appearance of Bias, the Fair-Minded and Informed Observer, and the "Ordinary Person in Queen Square Market”’. The Cambridge Law Journal 71.2 (2012): 247–250. Web.

---. ‘The Demise of Parliamentary Sovereignty? The Implications for Justifying Judicial Review’. Law Quarterly Review (1999): 119–137. Web. <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/ICCCA7BD0E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>.

---. ‘The Principle of Parliamentary Sovereignty in Legal, Constitutional, and Political Perspective’. The Changing Constitution. Ed. Jeffrey L. Jowell, Dawn Oliver, and Colm O’Cinneide. 8th Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015. 38–66. Print.

Elliott, Mark, and Robert Thomas. Public Law. 3rd Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017. Print.

---. Public Law. 3rd edn. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press, 2017. Web. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198765899.001.0001>.

---. ‘Themes, Sources, and Principles’. Public Law. 3rd Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017. 36–86. Print.

‘European Court of Human Rights’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://www.echr.coe.int/Pages/home.aspx?p=home>.

‘Exercise of Discretion in Administrative Decision-Making’. Web. <http://www.ombudsman.wa.gov.au/Publications/Documents/guidelines/Exercise-of-discretion-in-admin-decision-making.pdf>.

Feldman, David. ‘None, One or Several? Perspectives on the UK’s Constitution(s)’. The Cambridge Law Journal 64.2 (2005): 329–351. Web.

Fenwick, Helen. ‘The Anti–Terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001: A Proportionate Response to 11 September?’ The Modern Law Review 65.5 (2002): 724–762. Web.

Ferreira, Nuno. ‘The Supreme Court in a Final Push to Go Beyond Strasbourg’. Public Law (2015): n. pag. Web. <http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=http%3A%2F%2Fidp.rhul.ac.uk%2Foala&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI5409B340105311E5995D9B4942D36284%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue>.

Forsyth, Christopher. ‘Of Fig Leaves and Fairy Tales: The Ultra Vires Doctrine, the Sovereignty of Parliament and Judicial Review’. The Cambridge Law Journal 55.1 (1996): 122–140. Web.

Forsyth, Christopher, and Mark Elliott. ‘The Legitimacy of Judicial Review’. Public Law (2003): 286–307. Web. <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I795AA3A0E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>.

‘Gavin Phillipson: Historic Commons Syria Vote: The Constitutional Significance (Part I) | UK Constitutional Law Association’. N.p., n.d. Web. <https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2013/09/19/gavin-phillipson-historic-commons-syria-vote-the-constitutional-significance-part-i/>.

‘Gavin Phillipson: Historic Commons Syria Vote: The Constitutional Significance. Part II the Way Forward | UK Constitutional Law Association’. N.p., n.d. Web. <https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2013/11/29/gavin-phillipson-historic-commons-syria-vote-the-constitutional-significance-part-ii-the-way-forward/>.

Gee, G., and G. C. N. Webber. ‘What Is a Political Constitution?’ Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 30.2 (2010): 273–299. Web.

Ghaidan v. Godin-Mendoza [2004] UKHL 30. N.p. Web. <http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2004/30.html>.

Goldsworthy, J. ‘Homogenizing Constitutions’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 23.3 (2003): 483–505. Web.

Gordon, Michael. Parliamentary Sovereignty in the UK Constitution: Process, Politics and Democracy. v. 4. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2015. Web. <http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781474201667>.

Gregson, Rory. ‘When Should There Be an Implied Power to Delegate?’ Public Law (2017): 408–425. Web. <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IB5E035E04C6411E79A6EF925F51871C7/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>.

Hale, B. ‘Argentoratum Locutum: Is Strasbourg or the Supreme Court Supreme?’ Human Rights Law Review 12.1 (2012): 65–78. Web.

Hale, Lady. ‘The UK Supreme Court in the UK Constitution’ (Inaugural Lecture at the Institute for Legal and Constitutional Research, University of St Andrews, 8th of October 2015. N.p., 2015. Web. <https://www.supremecourt.uk/docs/speech-151008.pdf>.

Hickman, Tom. ‘The Substance and Structure of Proportionality’. Public Law (2008): 694–716. Web. <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I010EBB7099A111DD9611E019A6BFBE26/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>.

Hilson, Chris. ‘Judicial Review, Policies and the Fettering of Discretion’. Public Law (2002): 111–129. Web. <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/ID10F7880E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>.

Human Rights Act 1998. N.p. Web. <http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=http%3A%2F%2Fidp.rhul.ac.uk%2Foala&amp;returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI5FB840F0E42311DAA7CF8F68F6EE57AB%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue>.

‘In the Matter of an Application by Siobhan McLaughlin for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland) [2018] UKSC 48’. Web. <https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uksc-2017-0035-judgment.pdf>.

‘International Journal of Constitutional Law’. n. pag. Web. <https://librarysearch.royalholloway.ac.uk/permalink/44ROY_INST/16u3s8/alma997000681902671>.

Jackson & Ors v. Her Majesty’s Attorney General [2005] UKHL 56. N.p. Web. <http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2005/56.html>.

---. N.p. Web. <http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2005/56.html>.

Jaconelli, Joseph. ‘Do Constitutional Conventions Bind?’ The Cambridge Law Journal 64.1 (2005): 149–176. Web.

---. ‘Do Constitutional Conventions Bind?’ The Cambridge Law Journal 64.1 (2005): 149–176. Web.

Jones, Brian Christopher. ‘Preliminary Warnings on “Constitutional” Idolatry’. Public Law (2016): 74–92. Web. <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IE932C1D09A7F11E5ACC99E2443923C19/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>.

Jowell, Jeffrey. ‘Of Vires and Vacuums: The Constitutional Context of Judicial Review’. Public Law (1999): 448–460. Web. <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/ID1392090E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>.

---. ‘Parliamentary Sovereignty Under the New Constitutional Hypothesis’. Public Law (2006): 562–579. Print.

Jowell, Jeffrey, and Anthony Lester. ‘Beyond Wednesbury: Substantive Principles of Administrative Law’. Commonwealth Law Bulletin 14.2 (1988): 858–870. Web.

Kavanaugh, Aileen. ‘Defending Deference in Public Law and Constitutional Theory’. Law Quarterly Review 222 (2010): n. pag. Web. <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IF3B510D22E5211DFBE2FA967ED04D069/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>.

Knight, C. J. S. ‘A Framework for Fettering’. Judicial Review 14.1 (2009): 73–80. Web.

Le Sueur, A. P. ‘Legal Duties to Give Reasons’. Current Legal Problems 52.1 (1999): 150–172. Web.

Le Sueur, A. P., Maurice Sunkin, and Jo Eric Murkens. Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 3rd Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016. Print.

---. Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 4th edn. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press, 2019. Web. <http://doi.org.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/10.1093/he/9780198820284.001.0001>.

‘Legal Studies: The Journal of the Society of Legal Scholars’. n. pag. Web. <https://librarysearch.royalholloway.ac.uk/permalink/44ROY_INST/16u3s8/alma997017693302671>.

Lever, Annabelle. ‘Is Judicial Review Undemocratic?’ Public Law (2007): 280–298. Web. <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I25BAEDE0E30911DB9628FD37664FF158/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>.

Liversidge v Anderson [1941] UKHL 1. N.p. Web. <http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/1941/1.html>.

Lord Lester of Herne Hill. ‘Developing Constitutional Principles of Public Law’. Public Law (2001): 684–694. Web. <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I849E17B0E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>.

Loveland, Ian. Constitutional Law, Administrative Law, and Human Rights: A Critical Introduction. 9th Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021. Print.

---. Constitutional Law, Administrative Law, and Human Rights: A Critical Introduction. 9th Edition. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press, 2021. Print.

---. ‘Does Homelessness Decision Making Engage Article 6(1) of the European Convention on Human Rights?’ European Human Rights Law Review (2003): 176–204. Web. <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I7E856C70E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>.

---. ‘Human Rights II: Emergent Principles’. Constitutional Law, Administrative Law, and Human Rights: A Critical Introduction. 7th Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015. 588–615. Print.

---. ‘Human Rights II: Emergent Principles’. Constitutional Law, Administrative Law, and Human Rights: A Critical Introduction. 8th edn. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press, 2018. Web. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198804680.001.0001>.

Malleson, Kate. ‘Judicial Bias and Disqualification After Pinochet (No. 2)’. Modern Law Review 63.1 (2000): 119–127. Web.

‘Mark Elliot: Reflections on the HS2 Case: A Hierarchy of Domestic Constitutional Norms and the Qualified Primacy of EU Law | UK Constitutional Law Association’. N.p., n.d. Web. <https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2014/01/23/mark-elliot-reflections-on-the-hs2-case-a-hierarchy-of-domestic-constitutional-norms-and-the-qualified-primacy-of-eu-law/>.

Masterman, Roger, and Colin Murray. ‘Law, Politics, and the United Kingdom Constitution’. Exploring Constitutional and Administrative Law. Harlow, England: Pearson, 2013. 88–108. Print.

---. ‘Law, Politics, and the United Kingdom Constitution’. Exploring Constitutional and Administrative Law. N.p., 2003. 88–108. Web. <http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&amp;package_service_id=13409289760002671&amp;institutionId=2671&amp;customerId=2670>.

‘McLoughlin Supreme Court Press Summary’. Web. <https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uksc-2017-0035-press-summary.pdf>.

Miller & Anor, R (on the Application of) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union (Rev 3) [2017] UKSC 5. N.p. Web. <http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKSC/2017/5.html>.

Murkens, Jo Eric Khushal. ‘Democracy as the Legitimating Condition in the UK Constitution’. Legal Studies 38.01 (2018): 42–58. Web.

Nicol, Danny. ‘Law and Politics After the Human Rights Act’. Public Law (2006): 722–751. Web. <http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=http%3A%2F%2Fidp.rhul.ac.uk%2Foala&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI13579C41540511DB85F29853495F842F%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue>.

Norris, Martin. ‘Ex Parte Smith: Irrationality and Human Rights’. Public Law (1996): 590–600. Web. <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/ID37F6710E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>.

Oliver, Dawn. ‘Is the Ultra Vires Rule the Basis of Judicial Review?’ Public Law (1987): 543–569. Web. <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/ID3D7E750E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>.

Olowofoyeku, Abimbola A. ‘Bias and the Informed Observer: A Call for a Return to Gough’. The Cambridge Law Journal 68.2 (2009): 388–409. Web.

---. ‘The Nemo Judex Rule: The Case Against Automatic Disqualification’. Public Law (2000): 456–475. Web. <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/ID12EE760E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>.

‘Oxford Journal of Legal Studies’. n. pag. Web. <https://librarysearch.royalholloway.ac.uk/permalink/44ROY_INST/70508m/alma997001809702671>.

Perry, Adam, and Adam Tucker. ‘Top-Down Constitutional Conventions’. The Modern Law Review 81.5 (2018): 765–789. Web.

Phillipson, Gavin. ‘“Historic” Commons’ Syria Vote: The Constitutional Significance. Part I | UK Constitutional Law Association’. N.p., n.d. Web. <https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2013/09/19/gavin-phillipson-historic-commons-syria-vote-the-constitutional-significance-part-i/>.

---. ‘"Historic” Commons’ Syria Vote: The Constitutional Significance. Part II | the Way Forward – UK Constitutional Law Association’. N.p., n.d. Web. <https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2013/11/29/gavin-phillipson-historic-commons-syria-vote-the-constitutional-significance-part-ii-the-way-forward/>.

‘Political and Constitutional Reform Committee | UK Parliament’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/political-and-constitutional-reform-committee/>.

Poole, Thomas. ‘Of Headscarves and Heresies: The Denbigh High School Case and Public Authority Decision-Making Under the Human Rights Act’. Public Law (2005): 685–695. Web. <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I848A1A80E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>.

---. ‘The Reformation of English Administrative Law’. The Cambridge Law Journal 68.1 (2009): 142–168. Web.

‘​Principles of Good Administration | Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman (PHSO)’. N.p., n.d. Web. <https://www.ombudsman.org.uk/about-us/our-principles/principles-good-administration>.

‘Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee | UK Parliament’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/public-administration-and-constitutional-affairs-committee/>.

‘Public Law’. n. pag. Web. <https://uk.westlaw.com/WestlawUk/Journals/Publications/Public-Law>.

R (Chester) v Secretary of State for Justice [2013] UKSC 63. N.p. Web. <http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKSC/2013/63.html>.

R (Evans) v Attorney General [2015] UKSC 21. N.p. Web. <http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKSC/2015/21.html>.

R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5, [40]-[49]. N.p. Web. <https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/uksc-2016-0196.html>.

R (on the Application of Nicklinson and Another) (Appellants) v Ministry of Justice (Respondent) [2014] UKSC 38. N.p. Web. <https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/uksc-2013-0235.html>.

Rainey, Bernadette, Elizabeth Wicks, and Clare Ovey. ‘Context, Background, and Institutions’. Jacobs, White and Ovey: The European Convention on Human Rights. 6th Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014. 3–20. Print.

Ringhand, Lori. ‘Fig Leaves, Fairy Tales, and Constitutional Foundations: Debating Judicial Review in Britain’. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 43.3 (2005): n. pag. Web. <http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&amp;handle=hein.journals/cjtl43&amp;id=1>.

Rivers, Julian. ‘Proportionality and Variable Intensity of Review’. Cambridge Law Journal 65 (2006): 174–207. Web. <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IFB69CD50E72A11DC88EB9BE684C867E2/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>.

Sales, Philip. ‘Rationality, Proportionality and the Development of the Law’. Law Quarterly Review (2013): 223–241. Web. <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I69812151881411E2BACCBED531DFD77E/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>.

Stanton, John, and Craig Prescott. ‘Judicial Review: Access to Review and Remedies’. Public Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. Print.

---. ‘Judicial Review: Access to Review and Remedies’. Public Law. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press, 2018. Web. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198722939.001.0001>.

---. ‘Judicial Review: Illegality’. Public Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. Print.

---. ‘Judicial Review: Illegality’. Public Law. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press, 2018. Web. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198722939.001.0001>.

---. ‘Judicial Review: Irrationality and Proportionality’. Public Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. Print.

---. ‘Judicial Review: Irrationality and Proportionality’. Public Law. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press, 2018. Web. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198722939.001.0001>.

---. ‘Judicial Review: Procedural Impropriety’. Public Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. Print.

---. ‘Judicial Review: Procedural Impropriety’. Public Law. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press, 2018. Web. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198722939.001.0001>.

---. ‘Judicial Review: Procedural Impropriety’. Public Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. Print.

---. ‘Judicial Review: Procedural Impropriety’. Public Law. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press, 2018. Web. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198722939.001.0001>.

---. Public Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. Print.

---. ‘The Royal Prerogative and Constitutional Conventions’. Public Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. Print.

---. ‘The Royal Prerogative and Constitutional Conventions’. Public Law. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press, 2018. Web. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198722939.001.0001>.

Stanton, John, Craig Prescott, and David Mead. Public Law. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press, 2018. Web. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198722939.001.0001>.

Stark, Shona Wilson. ‘Facing Facts: Judicial Approaches to Section 4 of the Human Rights Act 1998’. Law Quarterly Review (2017): n. pag. Web. <http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=http%3A%2F%2Fidp.rhul.ac.uk%2Foala&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI553CB880985E11E7BEB8FD7157D7F73E%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue>.

Supperstone, Michael, and Jason Coppel. ‘Judicial Review After the Human Rights Act’. European Human Rights Law Review (1999): 301–329. Web. <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I84ACE4C0E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>.

‘Taming the Prerogative: Strengthening Ministerial Accountability to Parliament’. House of Commons. Public Administration Select Committee, 2003. Web. <https://parlipapers.proquest.com/parlipapers/result/pqpdocumentview?accountid=11455&amp;groupid=103502&amp;pgId=c5aea05f-b8ed-42b0-b2e6-8c68938d85ec>.

Taylor, Robert Brett. ‘Foundational and Regulatory Conventions: Exploring the Constitutional Significance of Britain’s Dependency Upon Conventions.’ Public Law (2015): 614–632. Web. <http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=http%3A%2F%2Fidp.rhul.ac.uk%2Foala&amp;returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI3A36A2305C5611E58916B963212E7CCD%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue>.

---. ‘Foundational and Regulatory Conventions: Exploring the Constitutional Significance of Britain’s Dependency Upon Conventions’. Public Law (2015): 614–632. Web. <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I3A36A2305C5611E58916B963212E7CCD/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>.

‘The Cambridge Law Journal’. n. pag. Web. <https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/cambridge-law-journal>.

‘The Constitution Unit Blog’. N.p., n.d. Web. <https://constitution-unit.com/>.

‘The Law Quarterly Review’. n. pag. Print.

‘The Modern Law Review’. n. pag. Web. <https://librarysearch.royalholloway.ac.uk/permalink/44ROY_INST/16u3s8/alma997003019902671>.

Tomkins, A. ‘In Defence of the Political Constitution’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 22.1 (2002): 157–175. Web.

‘Tomlinson and Others v Birmingham City Council  [2010] UKSC 8’. Web. <https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uksc-2009-0050-judgment.pdf>.

‘---’. Web. <https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uksc-2009-0050-judgment.pdf>.

Tomlinson, Joe. ‘The Narrow Approach to Substantive Legitimate Expectations and the Trend of Modern Authority’. Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal 17.1 (2017): 75–84. Web.

Turner, Ian. ‘Irrationality, the Human Rights Act and the Limits of Merits-Review’. Nottingham Law Journal 18 (2009): 18–36. Web. <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IC5A4DCE02B5711E08221F700C27502AE/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>.

‘UK Constitutional Law Association Blog | International Association of Constitutional Law’. N.p., n.d. Web. <https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/blog/>.

‘UK Human Rights Blog’. N.p., n.d. Web. <https://ukhumanrightsblog.com/>.

‘UK Parliament’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://www.parliament.uk/>.

‘Unmarried Mother Siobhan McLaughlin Wins Supreme Court Benefit Case | BBC’. N.p., 2018. Web. <https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-45355028>.

‘Unmarried Mother Wins Supreme Court Fight for Widowed Parents’ Allowance | Good Morning Britain | YouTube’. Web. <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cs4viID3KWI>.

Varuhas, Jason N.E. ‘The Reformation of English Administrative Law? "Rights”, Rhetoric and Reality’. The Cambridge Law Journal 72.2 (2013): 369–413. Web.

---. ‘The Reformation of English Administrative Law? "Rights”, Rhetoric and Reality’. The Cambridge Law Journal 72.2 (2013): 369–413. Web.

Waldron, Jeremy. ‘The Core of the Case Against Judicial Review’. The Yale Law Journal 115.6 (2006): n. pag. Web.

Walker, Paul. ‘What’s Wrong With Irrationality?’ Public Law (1995): 556–576. Web. <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/ID3967180E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>.

Watson, Jack. ‘Clarity and Ambiguity: A New Approach to the Test of Legitimacy in the Law of Legitimate Expectations’. Legal Studies 30.4 (2010): 633–652. Web.

Webley, Lisa, and Harriet Samuels. Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Fifth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021. Print.

---. Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 5th Edition. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press, 2021. Web. <https://doi-org.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/10.1093/he/9780198853183.001.0001>.

---. ‘“Constitutional Organisations, Institutions and Roles” and “The Nature of the British Constitution”’. Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 3rd Edition. Complete. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. 13–15. Print.

---. ‘“Constitutional Organisations, Institutions and Roles” and “The Nature of the British Constitution”’. Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 4th edn. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press, 2018. Web. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198798064.001.0001>.

---. ‘Human Rights’. Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 3rd Edition. Complete. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015. 255–290. Print.

---. ‘Human Rights’. Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 4th edn. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press, 2018. Web. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198798064.001.0001>.

---. ‘Human Rights’. Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 3rd Edition. Complete. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015. 255–290. Print.

---. ‘Human Rights’. Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 4th edn. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press, 2018. Web. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198798064.001.0001>.

---. ‘Illegality’. Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. Print.

---. ‘Illegality’. Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 4th edn. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press, 2018. Web. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198798064.001.0001>.

---. ‘Irrationality and Proportionality’. Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. Print.

---. ‘Irrationality and Proportionality’. Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 4th edn. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press, 2018. Web. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198798064.001.0001>.

---. ‘Parliamentary Supremacy: The Theory’. Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 3rd Edition. Complete. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015. 185–226. Print.

---. ‘Parliamentary Supremacy: The Theory’. Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 4th edn. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press, 2018. Web. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198798064.001.0001>.

---. ‘Procedural Impropriety’. Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. Print.

---. ‘Procedural Impropriety’. Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 4th edn. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press, 2018. Web. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198798064.001.0001>.

---. ‘Procedural Impropriety’. Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. Print.

---. ‘Procedural Impropriety’. Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 4th edn. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press, 2018. Web. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198798064.001.0001>.

---. ‘The Crown Royal Perogative’. Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 3rd Edition. Complete. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015. 145–182. Print.

---. ‘The Crown Royal Perogative’. Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 4th edn. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press, 2018. Web. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198798064.001.0001>.

---. ‘The Role of Constitutional Conventions’. Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 3rd Edition. Complete. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015. 365–393. Print.

---. ‘The Role of Constitutional Conventions’. Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials 2018. Web. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198798064.001.0001>.

---. ‘The Role of Constitutional Conventions’. Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. Print.

---. ‘The Role of Constitutional Conventions’. Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 4th edn. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press, 2018. Web. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198798064.001.0001>.

---. ‘The Role of the Courts, Judicial Review, and Human Rights’. Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. Print.

---. ‘The Role of the Courts, Judicial Review, and Human Rights’. Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 4th edn. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press, 2018. Web. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198798064.001.0001>.

---. ‘The Rule of Law’. Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 3rd Edition. Complete. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015. 77–113. Print.

---. ‘The Rule of Law’. Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 4th edn. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press, 2018. Web. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198798064.001.0001>.

---. ‘“What Is Public Law” and “Constitutional Organisations, Institutions, and Roles”, and “The Nature of the British Constitution”’. Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 3rd Edition. Complete. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. 3–76. Print.

---. ‘What Is Public Law’ and “Constitutional Organisations, Institutions, and Roles”, and “The Nature of the British Constitution”’. Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 4th edn. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press, 2018. Web. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198798064.001.0001>.

‘Where Next for the Wednesbury Principle? A Brief Response to Lord Carnwath | Public Law for Everyone’. N.p., n.d. Web. <https://publiclawforeveryone.com/2013/11/19/where-next-for-the-wednesbury-principle-a-brief-response-to-lord-carnwath/>.

Williams, David. ‘Bias; the Judges and the Separation of Powers’. Public Law (2000): 45–60. Web. <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/ID1246010E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>.

Williams, Rebecca. ‘Structuring Substantive Review’. Public Law (2017): 99–123. Web. <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IF32A9D40BAFC11E695A4FB481AEC10EF/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>.

Wong, Garreth. ‘Towards the Nutcracker Principle: Reconsidering the Objections to Proportionality’. Public Law (2000): 92–109. Web. <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/ID1301FE1E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>.

Young, A. L. ‘Will You, Won’t You, Will You Join the Deference Dance?’ Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 34.2 (2014): 375–394. Web.

Young, Alison L. ‘Is Dialogue Working Under the Human Rights Act 1998?’ Public Law (2011): 773–800. Web. <http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=http%3A%2F%2Fidp.rhul.ac.uk%2Foala&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FID7EAF690E23C11E080A9C399189E1576%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue>.