Abou-Rihan, Fadi. Deleuze and Guattari: A Psychoanalytic Itinerary. Continuum, 2008.
Arendt, Hannah. ‘Thinking and Moral Considerations: A Lecture’. Social Research, vol. 38, no. 3, 1971, https://www.jstor.org/stable/40970069?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents.
Bacon, Michael. ‘Breaking Up Is Hard to Do: John Gray’s Complicated Relationship With the Liberal Project’. Social Theory and Practice, vol. 36, no. 3, 2010, https://www.jstor.org/stable/23562129?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents.
Baderin, Alice. ‘Two Forms of Realism in Political Theory’. European Journal of Political Theory, vol. 13, no. 2, 2014, pp. 132–53, https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885113483284.
Bogue, Ronald. Deleuze and Guattari. Routledge, 1989.
Boothby, Richard. Death and Desire: Psychoanalytic Theory in Lacan’s Return to Freud. Routledge, 1991.
Bradshaw, Leah. Acting and Thinking: The Political Thought of Hannah Arendt. University of Toronto Press, 1989.
Brennan, Teresa. ‘An Impasse in Psychoanalysis and Feminism’. A Reader in Feminist Knowledge, Routledge, 1991.
———. Between Feminism and Psychoanalysis. Routledge, 1989.
Brennan, Theresa. Between Feminism and Psychoanalysis. Routledge, 1989, https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=169486. Electronic book.
Buchanan, Ian. Deleuze and Guattari’s Anti-Oedipus: A Reader’s Guide. Continuum, 2008.
———. Deleuzism: A Metacommentary. Edinburgh University Press, 2000.
Burke, Carolyn, et al. Engaging with Irigaray: Feminist Philosophy and Modern European Thought. Columbia University Press, 1994.
Calhoun, Craig J., and John P. McGowan. Hannah Arendt and the Meaning of Politics. University of Minnesota Press, 1997.
Camus, Albert. ‘Absurd Creation’. The Myth of Sisyphus, vol. 39, Penguin Books, 2005.
———. ‘An Absurd Reasoning’. The Myth of Sisyphus, vol. 39, Penguin Books, 2005.
———. ‘The Absurd Man’. The Myth of Sisyphus, vol. 39, Penguin Books, 2005.
———. ‘The Myth of Sisyphus’. The Myth of Sisyphus, vol. 39, Penguin Books, 2005.
Canovan, Margaret. Hannah Arendt: A Reinterpretation of Her Political Thought. Cambridge University Press, 1992, http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511521300.
———. Hannah Arendt: A Reinterpretation of Her Political Thought. Cambridge University Press, 1994.
———. The Political Thought of Hannah Arendt. Dent, 1974.
Card, Claudia. The Cambridge Companion to Simone de Beauvoir. Cambridge University Press, 2003, http://ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521790964. Electronic book.
Chanter, Tina. Ethics of Eros: Irigaray’s Re-Writing of the Philosophers. Routledge, 1995.
de Beauvoir, Simone. ‘Ambiguity and Freedom’. The Ethics of Ambiguity, Philosophical Library, 2015.
———. ‘Personal Freedom and Others’. The Ethics of Ambiguity, Philosophical Library, 2015.
———. ‘The Positive Aspect of Ambiguity’. The Ethics of Ambiguity, Philosophical Library, 2015.
De Bolle, Leen. Deleuze and Psychoanalysis: Philosophical Essays on Deleuze’s Debate With Psychoanalysis. Leuven University Press, 2010, https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=1762959. Electronic book.
Deleuze, Gilles, et al. Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Penguin Books, 2009.
Deleuze, Gilles, and Félix Guattari. Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. University of Minnesota Press, 1983.
Deleuze, Gilles, and Felix Guattari. ‘November 28, 1947: How Do You Make Yourself a Body Without Organs?’ A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, Continuum, 2004.
———. ‘Year Zero: Faciality’. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, Continuum, 2004.
Deutscher, Penelope. The Philosophy of Simone De Beauvoir: Ambiguity, Conversion, Resistance. Cambridge University Press, 2008, https://ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Holloway&isbn=9780511422102&uid=^u. Electronic resource.
Disch, Lisa Jane. Hannah Arendt and the Limits of Philosophy: With a New Preface. Cornell University Press, 1996.
Dreyfus, Hubert L. ‘Overcoming the Myth of the Mental: How Philosophers Can Profit From the Phenomenology of Everyday Expertise’. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, vol. 79, no. 2, 2005, https://www.jstor.org/stable/30046213?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents.
———. ‘Response to McDowell’. Inquiry, vol. 50, no. 4, 2007, pp. 371–77, https://doi.org/10.1080/00201740701489401.
———. ‘The Return of the Myth of the Mental’. Inquiry, vol. 50, no. 4, 2007, pp. 352–65, https://doi.org/10.1080/00201740701489245.
Enoch, D. ‘Against Public Reason’. Oxford Studies in Political Philosophy: Volume 1, edited by David Sobel et al., Oxford University Press, 2015.
Estlund, David, and Gerald F. Gaus. ‘Justificatory Liberalism: An Essay on Epistemology and Political Theory’. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, vol. 59, no. 3, 1999, https://doi.org/10.2307/2653803.
Finlayson, L. ‘Beware! Beware! The Forest of Sin!: Reluctant Reflections on Rawls’. The Political Is Political: Conformity and the Illusion of Dissent in Contemporary Political Philosophy, Rowman & Littlefield International, 2015.
Foley, John and Foley John Staff. Albert Camus: From the Absurd to Revolt. Acumen, 2008. Electronic resource.
Forrester, Katrina. ‘Judith Shklar, Bernard Williams and Political Realism’. European Journal of Political Theory, vol. 11, no. 3, 2012, pp. 247–72, https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885111430605.
Freyenhagen, Fabian. ‘Taking Reasonable Pluralism Seriously: An Internal Critique of Political Liberalism’. Politics, Philosophy & Economics, vol. 10, no. 3, 2011, pp. 323–42, https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X10388381.
Galston, William A. ‘Realism in Political Theory’. European Journal of Political Theory, vol. 9, no. 4, 2010, pp. 385–411, https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885110374001.
Gascoigne, Neil, and Tim Thornton. ‘Being in the Background’. Tacit Knowledge, Acumen, 2013.
———. ‘Being in the Background’. Tacit Knowledge, Acumen, 2013, http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=3061118.
Gaus, Gerald F. ‘Reasonable Pluralism and the Domain of the Political: How the Weaknesses of John Rawls’s Political Liberalism Can Be Overcome by a Justificatory Liberalism’. Inquiry, vol. 42, no. 2, 1999, pp. 259–84, https://doi.org/10.1080/002017499321570.
———. ‘The Rational, the Reasonable and Justification’. Journal of Political Philosophy, vol. 3, no. 3, 1995, pp. 234–58.
Gledhill, James. ‘Rawls and Realism’. Social Theory and Practice, vol. 38, no. 1, 2012, https://www.jstor.org/stable/23562155?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents.
Goodchild, Philip. Deleuze and Guattari: The Politics of Desire. Sage, 1996.
Gray, J. ‘Modus Vivendi’. Two Faces of Liberalism, New Press, 2000.
Grosz, E. A. Jacques Lacan: A Feminist Introduction. Routledge, 1990.
———. Sexual Subversions:  Three French Feminists. Allen & Unwin, 1989.
Guess, Raymond. ‘Part I: Realism’. Philosophy and Real Politics, Princeton University Press, 2008.
Hall, Edward, and Matt Sleat. ‘Ethics, Morality and the Case for Realist Political Theory’. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, vol. 20, no. 3, 2017, pp. 278–95, https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2017.1293343.
Hanna, Thomas. The Thought and Art of Albert Camus. Regnery, 1958.
Holland, Eugene W. Deleuze and Guattari’s A Thousand Plateaus: A Reader’s Guide. Bloomsbury, 2013.
———. Deleuze and Guattari’s Anti-Oedipus: Introduction to Schizoanalysis. Routledge, 1999.
———. Deleuze and Guattari’s Anti-Oedipus: Introduction to Schizoanalysis. Routledge, 1999, https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=165128. Electronic book.
Horton, John. ‘Realism, Liberal Moralism and a Political Theory of Modus Vivendi’. European Journal of Political Theory, vol. 9, no. 4, 2010, pp. 431–48, https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885110374004.
Hughes, Edward J. The Cambridge Companion to Camus. Cambridge University Press, 2007.
Hughes, Edward J. The Cambridge Companion to Camus. Cambridge University Press, 2007, http://ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521840481. Electronic book.
Ingaray, Luce. ‘Cosi Fan Tuti’. This Sex Which Is Not One, Cornell University Press, 1985.
Is There a Distinctively Political Normativity? https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdfplus/10.1086/697449.
Jubb, Robert. ‘On What Political Normativity Is’. Political Studies Review, 2019.
Kaufman, Eleanor, and Kevin Jon Heller. Deleuze and Guattari: New Mappings in Politics, Philosophy and Culture. University of Minnesota Press, 1998.
Kelly, Sean D. ‘Grasping at Straws: Motor Intentionality and the Cognitive Science of Skilled Behaviour’. Heidegger, Coping, and Cognitive Science, MIT Press, 2000.
Kelly, Sean Dorrance. ‘Merleau-Ponty on the Body’. Ratio, vol. 15, no. 4, 2002, pp. 376–91, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9329.00198.
Kripke, Saul A. Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language: An Elementary Exposition. Blackwell Pub, 1982, http://lib.myilibrary.com?id=174146. Electronic resource.
———. Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language: An Elementary Exposition. Harvard University Press, 1982.
Kruks, Sonia. Simone De Beauvoir and the Politics of Ambiguity. Oxford University Press, 2012.
Lacan, Jacques, and Alan Sheridan. ‘The Mirror Stage as Formative of the Function of the I’. Écrits: A Selection, Routledge, 1977.
———. ‘The Signification of the Phallus’. Écrits: A Selection, Routledge, 1977.
———. ‘The Subversion of the Subject and the Dialectic of Desire in the Freudian Unconscious.’ Écrits: A Selection, Routledge, 1977.
Lambert, Gregg. The Non-Philosophy of Gilles Deleuze. Continuum, 2002.
Langer, Monika. ‘A Philosophical Retrieval of Simone De Beauvoir’s Pour Une Morale De L’amiguité’. Philosophy Today, vol. 38, 1994, pp. 286–309, https://search.proquest.com/docview/1301481211?rfr_id=info%3Axri%2Fsid%3Aprimo.
Lorraine, Tamsin. Irigaray and Deleuze: Experiments in Visceral Thought. Cornell University Press, 1999.
Markell, Patchen. ‘Review of Raymond Geuss, Philosophy and Real Politics’. Political Theory, vol. 38, no. 1, 2010, https://www.jstor.org/stable/25655543?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents.
Massumi, Brian. A User’s Guide to Capitalism and Schizophrenia: Deviations From Deleuze and Guattari. MIT Press, 1992.
McBride, Joseph. Albert Camus. St. Martin’s Press, 1992.
McCabe, David. Modus Vivendi Liberalism: Theory and Practice. Cambridge University Press, 2010. Electronic resource.
McCarthy, Patrick. Camus. Random House, 1982.
McDowell, John. ‘Response to Dreyfus’. Inquiry, vol. 50, no. 4, 2007, pp. 366–70, https://doi.org/10.1080/00201740701489351.
Mcdowell, John. ‘What Myth?’ Inquiry, vol. 50, no. 4, 2007, pp. 338–51, https://doi.org/10.1080/00201740701489211.
McDowell, John. ‘Wittgenstein on Following a Rule’. Synthese, vol. 58, no. 3, 1984, https://www.jstor.org/stable/20115972?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents.
McGowan, John. Hannah Arendt: An Introduction. University of Minnesota Press, 1998.
———. Hannah Arendt: An Introduction. University of Minnesota Press, 1998, http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=310414.
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice, and Donald A. Landes. Phenomenology of Perception. Routledge, 2012, http://ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780203720714. Electronic resource.
———. Phenomenology of Perception. Routledge, 2014.
Miller, Alexander. ‘Rule-Following and Externalism’. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, vol. 68, no. 1, 2004, https://www.jstor.org/stable/40040662?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents.
Mitchell, Juliet, and Jacqueline Rose, editors. Feminine Sexuality: Jacques Lacan and the Ecole Freudienne. W.W. Norton & Company, 1985.
Mitchell, Juliet, and Jacqueline Rose. ‘God and the Jouissance of the Woman; A Love Letter’. Feminine Sexuality: Jacques Lacan and the Ecole Freudienne, edited by Juliet Mitchell and Jacqueline Rose, W.W. Norton & Company, 1982.
Moi, Toril. French Feminist Thought: A Reader. Blackwell, 1987.
Newey, Glen. After Politics: The Rejection of Politics in Contemporary Liberal Philosophy. Palgrave, 2001.
Noë, Alva. ‘Against Intellectualism’. Analysis, vol. 65, no. 4, 2005, https://www.jstor.org/stable/3329081?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents.
Parekh, Bhikhu C. Hannah Arendt and the Search for a New Political Philosophy. [Palgrave Macmillan], 2014.
Parr, Adrian. The Deleuze Dictionary. Edinburgh University Press, 2005.
Patton, Paul. Deleuze: A Critical Reader.
———. Deleuze and the Political. Routledge, 2000.
Philp, Mark. ‘Realism Without Illusions’. Political Theory, vol. 40, no. 5, 2012, https://www.jstor.org/stable/41703089?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents.
Pluth, Ed. ‘Lacan’s Subversion of the Subject’. Continental Philosophy Review, vol. 39, no. 3, 2007, pp. 293–312, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-006-9024-3.
Rawls, John. ‘Justice as Fairness: Political Not Metaphysical’. Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 14, no. 3, 1985, https://www.jstor.org/stable/2265349?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents.
Rose, Jacqueline. ‘Femininity and Its Discontents’. Sexuality: A Reader, Virago, 1987.
Rossi, Enzo, and Matt Sleat. ‘Realism in Normative Political Theory’. Philosophy Compass, vol. 9, no. 10, 2014, pp. 689–701, https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12148.
Runciman, David. ‘What Is Realistic Political Philosophy?’ Metaphilosophy, vol. 43, no. 1, 2012, https://www.jstor.org/stable/24441862?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents.
Rutherford, Nat. ‘Instability and Modus Vivendi’. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 2018, pp. 1–22, https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2018.1525119.
Ryle, Gilbert. ‘Descartes’ Myth’. The Concept of Mind, Penguin, 2000.
———. ‘Knowing How and Knowing That’. The Concept of Mind, Penguin, 2000.
———. ‘Knowing How and Knowing That: The Presidential Address’. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, vol. 46, 1946, https://www.jstor.org/stable/4544405?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents.
Sagi, Abraham. Albert Camus and the Philosophy of the Absurd. Rodopi, 2002.
Sartre, Jean-Paul. Being and Nothingness: An Essay on Phenomenological Ontology. Routledge, 2003.
———. Being and Nothingness: An Essay on Phenomenological Ontology. Routledge, 2003.
———. Being and Nothingness: An Essay on Phenomenological Ontology. Routledge, 2003, http://ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780203827123. Electronic book.
Scalon, T. M. ‘Rawls on Justification’. The Cambridge Companion to Rawls, Cambridge University Press, 2003.
Schear, Joseph K. Mind, Reason and Being-in-the-World: The McDowell-Dreyfus Debate. Routledge, 2013.
———. Mind, Reason and Being-in-the-World: The McDowell-Dreyfus Debate. Routledge, 2013, http://ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780203076316. Electronic resource.
Schuster, Aaron. The Trouble with Pleasure. The MIT Press, 2016.
Searle, John R. ‘Background Abilities and the Explanation of Social Phenomena’. The Construction of Social Reality, Penguin, 1996.
———. ‘Introduction’. The Construction of Social Reality, Penguin, 1996.
———. ‘The Building Blocks of Social Reality’. The Construction of Social Reality, Penguin, 1996.
Sleat, Matt. Liberal Realism: A Realist Theory of Liberal Politics. Manchester Univ Pr, 2013.
Somers-Hall, Henry, et al., editors. A Thousand Plateaus and Philosophy. Edinburgh University Press, 2018.
Sprintzen, David. Camus. Temple University Press, 1991. Paperback.
Srigley, R. Albert Camus Critique of Modernity. University of Missouri Press, 2011.
Stanley, Jason, and Timothy Willlamson. ‘Knowing How’. Journal of Philosophy, vol. 98, no. 8, 2001, pp. 411–44, https://doi.org/10.2307/2678403.
Stavrakakis, Yannis. Lacan and the Political. Routledge, 1999.
Stivale, Charles J. Gilles Deleuze: Key Concepts. Acumen, 2005.
———. The Two-Fold Thought of Deleuze and Guattari: Intersections and Animations. Guilford Press, 1998.
The Political Theory of Modus Vivendi. 1st ed. 2019, Springer International Publishing AG, 2018.
Wall, Steven. ‘Is Public Justification Self-Defeating?’ American Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 39, no. 4, 2002, https://www.jstor.org/stable/20010087?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents.
Weithman, Paul J. Why Political Liberalism?: On John Rawls’s Political Turn. Oxford University Press, 2010.
———. Why Political Liberalism?: On John Rawls’s Political Turn. Oxford University Press, 2010, https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=3054013. Electronic resource.
Whitford, Margaret. Luce Irigaray: Philosophy in the Feminine. Routledge, 1991.
Widder, Nathan. Political Theory After Deleuze. Continuum, 2012.
———. Political Theory After Deleuze. Continuum, 2012, https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=918769. Electronic book.
———. Reflections on Time and Politics. Pennsylvania State University Press, 2008.
———. ‘Two Routes from Hegel’. The Onlife Manifesto: Being Human in a Hyperconnected Era, edited by Luciano Floridi, Springer International Publishing, 2015. Electronic resource.
Williams, B. ‘Realism and Moralism in Political Theory’. In the Beginning Was the Deed: Realism and Moralism in Political Argument, Princeton University Press, 2008.
Williams, Caroline. ‘Feminism, Subjectivity and Psychoanalysis:  Towards a (Corpo)Real Knowledge’. Knowing the Difference: Feminist Perspectives in Epistemology, Routledge, 1994.
Wilson, Elizabeth. ‘Psychoanalysis:  Psychic Law and Order’. Sexuality: A Reader, Virago, 1987.
Zizek, Slavoj. How to Read Lacan. Granta Books, 2006.
———. The Sublime Object of Ideology. Verso, 1989.