1.
Chaucer G, Windeatt BA. Troilus and Criseyde. London: Penguin; 2003.
2.
Chaucer G, Mann J. The Canterbury Tales. London: Penguin; 2005.
3.
Langland W, Schmidt AVC. Piers Plowman: A Critical Edition of the B-text. London: Dent; 1995.
4.
Bahr A. Fragments and Assemblages: Forming Compilations of Medieval London. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 2013.
5.
Bahr A. Fragments and Assemblages: Forming Compilations of Medieval London [Internet]. 2013. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=1158528
6.
Barron C. London 1300-1540. The Cambridge Urban History of Britain, 1: 600-1540. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000. p. 395–440.
7.
Barron C. London 1300-1540. The Cambridge Urban History of Britain, 1: 600-1540 [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000. p. 395–440. Available from: http://ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521444613
8.
Barron CM. London in the Later Middle Ages: Government and People ; 1200-1500. Oxford [u.a.]: Oxford Univ. Press; 2004.
9.
Barron CM. London in the Later Middle Ages: Government and People, 1200-1500 [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2004. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199257775.001.0001
10.
Benson CD. London. Chaucer: An Oxford Guide. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005. p. 66–80.
11.
Benson CD. Some Poets’ Tours of Medieval London: Varieties of Literary Urban Experience. Essays in Medieval Studies. 2007;24(1):1–20.
12.
Boffey J. London Books and London Readers. Cultural Reformations: Medieval and Renaissance in Literary History. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010. p. 420–437.
13.
Boffey J, Meale CM. Selecting the Text: Rawlinson C. 86 and some Other Books for London Readers. Regionalism in Late Medieval Manuscripts and Texts: Essays Celebrating the Publication of A Linguistic Atlas of Late Medieval English. Cambridge: Brewer; 1991. p. 143–169.
14.
Christianson CP. The Rise of London’s Book Trade. The Cambridge History of the Book in Britain: Vol 3: 1400-1557. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999. p. 128–147.
15.
Christianson CP. The Rise of London’s Book Trade. The Cambridge History of the Book in Britain, Volume 3: 1400-1557 [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999. p. 127–147. Available from: http://ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521573467
16.
Davies MP, Prescott A. London and the Kingdom: Essays in Honour of Caroline M. Barron, Proceedings of the 2004 Harlaxton Symposium. Donington: Shaun Tyas; 2008.
17.
DeVries DN. And Away Go Troubles Down the Drain: Late Medieval London and the Poetics of Urban Renewal. Exemplaria. 1996;8(2):401–418.
18.
Federico S. New Troy: Fantasies of Empire in the Late Middle Ages. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 2003.
19.
Hanawalt BA. Growing Up in Medieval London: The Experience of Childhood in History. New York: Oxford University Press; 1993.
20.
Hanawalt BA, Wallace D. Medieval Crime and Social Control. Minneapolis, Minn: University of Minnesota Press; 1999.
21.
Hanawalt BA, Wallace D. Medieval Crime and Social Control [Internet]. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 1999. Available from: https://ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.ctttv1nm
22.
Hanna R. London Literature, 1300-1380. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005.
23.
Hanna R. London Literature, 1300-1380 [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005. Available from: https://royalholloway.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Holloway&isbn=9780511299070&uid=^u
24.
Hanna R. Images of London in Medieval English Literature. The Cambridge Companion to the Literature of London [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011. p. 19–33. Available from: https://ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521897525
25.
Hanna R. Images of London in Medieval English Literature. The Cambridge Companion to the Literature of London [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011. p. 19–33. Available from: http://ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521897525
26.
Hsy J. City. A Handbook of Middle English Studies. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2013. p. 315–329.
27.
Hsy J. City. A Handbook of Middle English Studies [Internet]. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2013. p. 315–330. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=1120938
28.
Lindenbaum S. Ceremony and Oligarchy: the London Midsummer Watch. City and Spectacle in Medieval Europe. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 1994. p. 171–188.
29.
Lindenbaum S. London Texts and Literate Practice. The Cambridge History of Medieval English Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999. p. 284–309.
30.
Lindenbaum S. London Texts and Literate Practice. The Cambridge History of Medieval English Literature [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999. p. 284–309. Available from: http://ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521444200
31.
Mary-Rose McLaren. The London Chronicles of the Fifteenth Century: A Revolution in English Writing. With an annotated edition of Bradford, West Yorkshire Archives MS ... Archives MS 32D86/42 Annotated Edition. D.S.Brewer; 2002.
32.
Meale CM. The Libelle of Englyshe Polycye and Mercantile Literary Culture in Late-Medieval London. London and Europe in the Later Middle Ages. London: Centre for Medieval and Renaissance Studies; 1995. p. 181–227.
33.
Mooney LR, Stubbs E. Scribes and the City: London Guildhall Clerks and the Dissemination of Middle English Literature, 1375-1425. Woodbridge, Suffolk: York Medieval Press; 2013.
34.
Nicholas D. The Later Medieval City: 1300-1500: A History of Urban Society in Europe. New York: Longman; 1997.
35.
Nightingale P. Medieval Mercantile Community: The Grocer’s Company and the Politics and Trade of London, 1000-1485. New Haven, Conn: Yale University Press; 1995.
36.
Rees Jones S. City and Country, Wealth and Labour. A Companion to Medieval English Literature and Culture, c1350-c1500 [Internet]. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing; 2009. p. 56–73. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=284252
37.
Rees Jones S. City and Country, Wealth and Labour. A Companion to Medieval English Literature and Culture, c1350-c1500 [Internet]. Oxford: Blackwell; 2007. p. 56–73. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=284252
38.
Rexroth F, Selwyn PE. Deviance and Power in Late Medieval London. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007.
39.
Richardson M. Middle Class Writing in Late Medieval London. Pickering & Chatto Publishers; 2010.
40.
Scase W. Reginald Pecock, John Carpenter and John Colop’s ‘Common-Profit’ Books: Aspects of Book Ownership and Circulation in Fifteenth-Century London. Medium Ævum. 1992;61(2):261–274.
41.
Schofield J. Medieval London Houses. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1994.
42.
Turner M. Chaucerian Conflict: Languages of Antagonism in Late Fourteenth-century London. Oxford: Clarendon; 2007.
43.
Turner M. Chaucerian Conflict: Languages of Antagonism in Late Fourteenth-century London [Internet]. Oxford: Clarendon; 2007. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=415153
44.
Wiggins A. The City and the Text: London Literature. The Oxford Handbook of Medieval English Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010. p. 540–556.
45.
Wright L. Sources of London English: Medieval Thames Vocabulary. Oxford: Clarendon; 1996.
46.
Herzman RB. Bevis of Hampton. Four Romances of England. Kalamazoo, Mich: Medieval Institute Publications, Western Michigan University; 1999. p. 187–340.
47.
Kempe M, Staley L. The Book of Margery Kempe. Kalamazoo, Mich: Published for TEAMS (the Consortium for the Teaching of the Middle Ages) in association with the University of Rochester by Medieval Institute Publications, Western Michigan University; 1996.
48.
Langland W, Pearsall D. Piers Plowman: the C-text. Corr. ed. Exeter: University of Exeter Press; 1994.
49.
Dean JM. London Lickpenny. Medieval English Political Writings. Kalamazoo, Mich: Published for TEAMS (the Consortium for the Teaching of the Middle Ages) in association with the University of Rochester by Medieval Institute Publications, Western Michigan University; 1996. p. 222–225.
50.
Ford M. London, Thou Art of Townes A Per Se. London: A History in Verse. Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press; 2012. p. 56–58.
51.
Benson CD. Some Poets’ Tours of Medieval London: Varieties of Literary Urban Experience. Essays in Medieval Studies [Internet]. Chicago: West Virginia University; 2007;24(1):1–20. Available from: https://muse.jhu.edu/article/239732
52.
Davis J. Medieval Market Morality: Life, Law and Ethics in the English Marketplace, 1200-1500. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2013.
53.
Davis J. Medieval Market Morality [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011. Available from: https://royalholloway.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Holloway&isbn=9781139183512&uid=^u
54.
Dinshaw C. Margery Kempe. The Cambridge Companion to Medieval Women’s Writing. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press; 2003. p. 222–239.
55.
Dinshaw C. Margey Kempe. In: Dinshaw C, Wallace D, editors. The Cambridge Companion to Medieval Women’s Writing [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2003. p. 222–239. Available from: http://ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CCOL052179188X
56.
Farber L. Community. An Anatomy of Trade in Medieval Writing: Value, Consent, and Community. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press; 2006. p. 150–179.
57.
Hanna R. Images of London in Medieval English Literature. The Cambridge Companion to the Literature of London. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011. p. 19–33.
58.
Hanna R. Images of London in Medieval English Literature. The Cambridge Companion to the Literature of London [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011. p. 19–33. Available from: http://ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521897525
59.
Hsy J. City. A Handbook of Middle English Studies. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2013. p. 315–329.
60.
Hsy J. City. A Handbook of Middle English Studies [Internet]. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2013. p. 315–329. Available from: https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=1120938
61.
Kerby-Fulton K. Acts of Vagrancy: The C Version ‘Autobiography’ and the Statute of 1388. Written Work: Langland, Labor, and Authorship. Philadelphia, Pa: University of Pennsylvania Press; 1997. p. 208–317.
62.
Rees Jones S. City and Country, Wealth and Labour. A Companion to Medieval English Literature and Culture, c1350-c1500 [Internet]. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing; 2009. p. 56–73. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=284252
63.
Rees Jones S. City and Country, Wealth and Labour. A Companion to Medieval English Literature and Culture, c1350-c1500 [Internet]. Oxford: Blackwell; 2007. p. 56–73. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=284252
64.
Weiss J. The Major Interpolations in Sir Beues of Hamtoun. Medium Aevum [Internet]. Society for the Study of Mediæval Languages and Literature [etc.]; 1979;48:71–76. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/43628416?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
65.
Wiggins A. The City and the Text: London Literature. The Oxford Handbook of Medieval English Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010. p. 540–556.
66.
Brinton T. Sermon for the Fifth Sunday after Easter. Preaching in the Age of Chaucer: Selected Sermons in Translation [Internet]. Washington, D.C.: Catholic University of America Press; 2008. p. 241–254. Available from: https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=3135016&pq-origsite=primo
67.
Langland W, Schmidt AVC. Piers Plowman: A Critical Edition of the B-text. London: Dent; 1995.
68.
Rigg AG, Carlson DR. Accounts of Richard’s 1377 Coronation Entry. Concordia: The Reconciliation of Richard II with London. Kalamazoo, Mich: Published for The Consortium for the Teaching of the Middle Ages in Association with the University of Rochester by Medieval Institute Publications; 2003.
69.
Baldwin AP. The Theme of Government in Piers Plowman. Cambridge: Brewer; 1981.
70.
Craun ED. Managing the Rhetoric of Reproof: The B-Version of Piers Plowman. Ethics and power in medieval English reformist writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010. p. 57–84.
71.
Craun ED. Managing the Rhetoric of Reproof: The B-Version of Piers Plowman. Ethics and Power in Medieval English Reformist Writing [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010. p. 57–84. Available from: https://www-vlebooks-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/Vleweb/Product/Index/2000846?page=0
72.
Dodd G. A Parliament Full of Rats? Piers Plowman and the Good Parliament of 1376. Historical Research. 2006;79(203):21–49.
73.
Barney SA. The Penn Commentary on Piers Plowman: Vol. 5: C Passus 20-22; B Passus 18-20. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press; 2006.
74.
Giancarlo M. Parliament and Literature in Late Medieval England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010.
75.
Hanna R. ‘Ledeþ hire to Londoun þere lawe is yshewed’: Piers Plowman B, London, 1377. London Literature, 1300-1380. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005. p. 243–304.
76.
Hanna R. ‘Ledeþ Hire to Londoun Þere Lawe Is Yshewed’: Piers Plowman B, London, 1377. London Literature, 1300-1380 [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005. p. 243–304. Available from: https://www-vlebooks-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/Vleweb/Product/Index/2003970?page=0
77.
Kennedy KE. Retaining a Court of Chancery in Piers Plowman. The Yearbook of Langland Studies [Internet]. Colleagues Press; 2003;17:175–189. Available from: http://www.brepolsonline.net/doi/abs/10.1484/J.YLS.2.302632
78.
Kennedy KE. Retaining Men (and a Retaining Woman) in Piers Plowman. The Yearbook of Langland Studies [Internet]. Colleagues Press; 2006;20:191–214. Available from: http://www.brepolsonline.net/doi/abs/10.1484/J.YLS.2.302579
79.
Lassahn N. Langland’s Rats Revisited: Conservatism, Commune, and Political Unanimity. Viator [Internet]. Brepols [etc.]; 2008;39(1):127–155. Available from: http://www.brepolsonline.net/doi/abs/10.1484/J.VIATOR.1.100117
80.
Lightsey S. By Angel’s Hand: Piers Plowman and London’s Crowning Gesture. Manmade marvels in medieval culture and literature. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2007. p. 27–53.
81.
Lightsey S. By Angel’s Hand: Piers Plowman and London’s Crowning Gesture. Manmade Marvels in Medieval Culture and Literature [Internet]. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2007. p. 27–53. Available from: https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=361606
82.
Middleton A. The Idea of Public Poetry in the Reign of Richard II. Speculum [Internet]. Cambridge University Press; 1978;53(1):94–114. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2855608?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
83.
Ormrod WM. The Trials of Alice Perrers. Speculum [Internet]. 2008;83(02):366–396. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20466215?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
84.
Steiner E. Commonality and Literary Form in the 1370s and 1380s. New Medieval Literatures: Vol 6. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003. p. 199–221.
85.
Watts J. Public or Plebs: The Changing Meaning of ‘The Commons’, 1381-1549. Power and Identity in the Middle Ages: Essays in Memory of Rees Davies. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007. p. 242–260.
86.
Watts J. Public or Plebs: The Changing Meaning of "The Commons”, 1381-1549. Power and Identity in the Middle Ages: Essays in Memory of Rees Davies [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007. p. 242–260. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199285464.001.0001
87.
Yunck JA. Lineage of Lady Meed. Notre Dame IN, USA: University of Notre Dame Press;
88.
Images of characters from Piers Plowman from a manuscript of the C text ‘Ms. douce 104’ - ODL [Internet]. Available from: http://bodley30.bodley.ox.ac.uk:8180/luna/servlet/view/search?q=Shelfmark=%22MS.%20Douce%20104%22&sort=Shelfmark,Folio_Page,Roll_#,Frame_
89.
Chaucer G, Mann (ed.) J. ‘The Cook’s Prologue and Tale’ and ‘The Canon’s Yeoman’s Prologue and Tale’. The Canterbury Tales. London: Penguin; 2005.
90.
Chaucer G, Mann (ed.) J. ‘The Miller’s Prologue and Tale’, 'The Reeve’s Prologue and Tale’ and ‘The Shipman’s Prologue and Tale’. The Canterbury Tales. London: Penguin; 2005.
91.
Collette CP, DiMarco V. ‘The Canon’s Yeoman’s Tale’. The Sources and Analogues of The Canterbury Tales. Woodbridge: D.S. Brewer; 2005. p. 715–747.
92.
Collette CP, DiMarco V. The Canon’s Yeoman’s Tale. Sources and Analogues of the Canterbury Tales [Internet]. Woodbridge: D.S. Brewer; 2002. p. 715–748. Available from: https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=1068961&query=Sources+and+Analogues+of+the+Canterbury+Tales
93.
Scattergood J. The Cook’s Tale. The Sources and Analogues of The Canterbury Tales. Woodbridge: D.S. Brewer; 2005. p. 75–86.
94.
Scattergood J. The Cook’s Tale. Sources and Analogues of the Canterbury Tales [Internet]. Woodbridge: D.S. Brewer; 2002. p. 75–86. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=218478
95.
Benson CD. Some Poets’ Tours of Medieval London: Varieties of Literary Urban Experience. Essays in Medieval Studies [Internet]. West Virginia University; 2007;24(1):1–20. Available from: https://muse.jhu.edu/article/239732
96.
Boyd DL. Social Texts: Bodley 686 and the Politics of ‘The Cook’s Tale’. Huntington Library Quarterly. 1995;58(1):81–97.
97.
Cartlidge N. Wayward Sons and Failing Fathers: Chaucer’s Moralistic Paternalism – And a Possible Source for ‘The Cook’s Tale’. The Chaucer Review. 2012;47(2):134–160.
98.
Cannon C. Chaucer and the Language of London. Chaucer and the City. Cambridge: Brewer; 2006.
99.
Cannon C. Chaucer and the Language of London. Chaucer and the City [Internet]. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer; 2006. Available from: https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=1068968
100.
Casey J. Unfinished Business: The Termination of Chaucer’s ‘Cook’s Tale’. The Chaucer Review [Internet]. Pennsylvania State University Press.; 2006;41(2):185–196. Available from: https://muse.jhu.edu/article/202177
101.
Collette CP. Nature Obeying the Thoughts and Desires of the Soul: Alchemy and Vision in ‘The Second Nun’s Tale’ and ‘The Canon’s Yeoman’s Tale’. Species, Phantasms, and Images: Vision and Medieval Psychology in the Canterbury Tales. Ann Arbor, Mich: University of Michigan Press; 2001. p. 127–160.
102.
Davis I. ‘And of My Swynk Yet Blered Is Myn Ye’: Chaucer’s Canon’s Yeoman Looks in the Mirror. Writing Masculinity in the Later Middle Ages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007. p. 108–137.
103.
Knapp PA. The Work of Alchemy. Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies. 2000;30(3):575–599.
104.
Landman JH. The Laws of Community, Margery Kempe, and ‘The Canon’s Yeoman’s Tale’. Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies [Internet]. Duke University Press; 1998;28(2):389–425. Available from: http://www.geocities.ws/salferrat/chaucland.htm
105.
Patterson L. Perpetual Motion: Alchemy and the Technology of the Self. Studies in the Age of Chaucer. New Chaucer Society, University of Oklahoma; 1993;15:25–57.
106.
Sisk JL. Religion, Alchemy, and Nostalgic Idealism in Fragment VIII of the Canterbury Tales. Studies in the Age of Chaucer [Internet]. New Chaucer Society, University of Oklahoma; 2010;32:151–177. Available from: https://muse.jhu.edu/article/402779&req.language=eng
107.
Burrow JA, Turville-Petre T. St Erkenwald. A Book of Middle English. 3rd Edition. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub; 2005. p. 221–234.
108.
Burrow (ed.) JA, Turville-Petre (ed.) T. St Erkenwald. A Book of Middle English [Internet]. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub; 2005. p. 221–234. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=848524
109.
Morse R. St Erkenwald. Cambridge: Brewer; 1975.
110.
Borroff M. Saint Erkenwald. The Gawain Poet: Complete Works : Patience, Cleanness, Pearl, Saint Erkenwald, Sir Gawain and the Green Knight. New York: W.W. Norton & Co; 2011. p. 169–186.
111.
Brian Stone. St Erkenwald. ‘The Owl and the Nightingale’; ‘Cleanness’; ‘St Erkenwald’. Penguin Books; p. 13–43.
112.
Benson LD. The Authorship of ‘St. Erkenwald’. The Journal of English and Germanic Philology [Internet]. University of Illinois Press; 1965;64(3):393–405. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/27714679?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
113.
Bugbee J. Sight and Sound in St. Erkenwald: On Theodicy and the Senses. Medium Ævum [Internet]. Society for the Study of Mediæval Languages and Literature [etc.]; 2008;77(2):202–221. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/43632337?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
114.
Coley D. Baptism as Eucharist: Orthodoxy, Wycliffism, and the Sacramental Utterance in Saint Erkenwald. The Journal of English and Germanic Philology [Internet]. 2008;107(3):327–347. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20722637?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
115.
Grady F. Piers Plowman, St. Erkenwald, and the Rule of Exceptional Salvations. The Yearbook of Langland Studies [Internet]. Colleagues Press; 1992;6:61–88. Available from: http://www.brepolsonline.net/doi/abs/10.1484/J.YLS.2.302877
116.
Grady F. St. Erkenwald and the Merciless Parliament. Studies in the Age of Chaucer. New Chaucer Society, University of Oklahoma; 2000;22:179–212.
117.
Grady F. Looking Awry at St Erkenwald. Exemplaria [Internet]. Medieval; 2011;23(2):105–125. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1179/104125711X12946752336109
118.
Nissé R. ‘A Coroun Ful Riche’: The Rule of History in St. Erkenwald. ELH. 1998;65(2):277–295.
119.
Otter M. ‘New Werke’: St. Erkenwald, St. Albans, and the Medieval Sense of the Past. The Journal of Medieval and Renaissance Studies. Duke University Press; 1994;24(3):387–414.
120.
Scattergood VJ. St. Erkenwald and the Custody of the Past. The lost tradition: essays on Middle English alliterative poetry. Dublin: Four Courts Press; 2000. p. 179–199.
121.
Schwyzer P. Exhumation and Ethnic Conflict: From St. Erkenwald to Spenser in Ireland. Representations [Internet]. University of Calif. Press; 2006;(95):1–26. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/rep.2006.95.1.1?Search=yes&resultItemClick=true&searchText=sn:07346018&searchText=AND&searchText=year:2006&searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoBasicSearch%3FQuery%3Dsn%253A07346018%2BAND%2Byear%253A2006%26amp%3Bymod%3DYour%2Binbound%2Blink%2Bdid%2Bnot%2Bhave%2Ban%2Bexact%2Bmatch%2Bin%2Bour%2Bdatabase.%2BBut%2Bbased%2Bon%2Bthe%2Belements%2Bwe%2Bcould%2Bmatch%252C%2Bwe%2Bhave%2Breturned%2Bthe%2Bfollowing%2Bresults.&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
122.
Sisk JL. The Uneasy Orthodoxy of St. Erkenwald. ELH [Internet]. Johns Hopkins University Press; 2007;74(1):89–115. Available from: https://muse.jhu.edu/article/210887
123.
Smith DV. Irregular Histories: Forgetting Ourselves. New Literary History. 1997;28(2):161–184.
124.
Smith DV. Crypt and Decryption: Erkenwald Terminable and Interminable. New medieval literatures: 5. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2002. p. 59–85.
125.
Staley L. The Man in Foul Clothes and a Late Fourteenth-Century Conversation about Sin. Studies in the Age of Chaucer [Internet]. Norman, Okla.: New Chaucer Society, University of Oklahoma; 2002;24:1–47. Available from: https://muse.jhu.edu/article/587042/pdf
126.
Turville-Petre T. St. Erkenwald and the Crafty Chronicles. Studies in late medieval and early renaissance texts in honour of John Scattergood: ‘The key of all good remembrance’. Dublin: Four Courts Press; 2005. p. 362–374.
127.
Camp CT. Spatial Memory, Historiographic Fantasy, and the Touch of the Past in St. Erkenwald. New Literary History. 2013;44(3):471–491.
128.
Whatley G. Heathens and Saints: St. Erkenwald in Its Legendary Context. Speculum. 1986;61(2):330–363.
129.
Barron CM. London and St Paul’s Cathedral in the Later Middle Ages. The Medieval English Cathedral: Papers in Honour of Pamela Tudor-Craig. Donington: Shaun Tyas; 2003. p. 126–149.
130.
Barron CM. Cathedral, City, and State, 1300-1540. St Paul’s: the Cathedral Church of London, 604-2004. New Haven: Yale University Press; 2004. p. 33–44.
131.
Duffy E. St Erkenwald: London’s Cathedral Saint and His Legend. The Medieval English Cathedral: Papers in Honour of Pamela Tudor-Craig. Donington: Shaun Tyas; 2003. p. 150–167.
132.
Chaucer G, Windeatt BA. Troilus and Criseyde. London: Penguin; 2003.
133.
Dinshaw C. Reading Like a Man: The Critics, the Narrator, Troilus, and Pandarus. Chaucer’s Sexual Poetics. Madison, Wis: University of Wisconsin Press; 1989. p. 28–64.
134.
Federico S. Chaucer’s Utopian Troy Book: Alternatives to Historiography in Troilus and Criseyde. Exemplaria [Internet]. Medieval; 1999;11(1):79–106. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1179/exm.1999.11.1.79
135.
Federico S. Two Troy Books: The Political Classicism of Walsingham’s Ditis ditatus and Chaucer’s Troilus and Criseyde. Studies in the Age of Chaucer. 2013;35(1):137–177.
136.
Fradenburg LO. ‘Our owen wo to drynke’: Dying Inside in Troilus and Criseyde. Sacrifice Your Love: Psychoanalysis, Historicism, Chaucer. Minneapolis, Minn: University of Minnesota Press; 2002. p. 199–238.
137.
Fradenburg LO. ‘Our owen wo to drynke’: Dying Inside in Troilus and Criseyde. Sacrifice Your Love: Psychoanalysis, Historicism, Chaucer [Internet]. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 2002. p. 199–238. Available from: http://ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/login?url=http://lib.myilibrary.com?id=522616
138.
Ganim JM. Chaucer and the Noise of the People. Exemplaria [Internet]. Medieval; 1990;2(1):71–88. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1179/exm.1990.2.1.71
139.
Giancarlo M. The Structure of Fate and the Devising of History in Chaucer’s Troilus and Criseyde. Studies in the Age of Chaucer. Norman, Okla.: New Chaucer Society, University of Oklahoma; 2004;26:227–266.
140.
Justice S. Chaucer’s History-Effect. Answerable Style: The Idea of the Literary in Medieval England. Columbus: Ohio State University Press; 2013. p. 169–194.
141.
Koster JA. Privitee, Habitus, and Proximity: Conduct and Domestic Space in Chaucer’s Troilus and Criseyde. Essays in Medieval Studies [Internet]. West Virginia University; 2007;24(1):79–91. Available from: https://muse.jhu.edu/article/239738
142.
Margherita G. Historicity, Femininity, and Chaucer’s Troilus. Exemplaria. Medieval; 1994;6(2):243–69.
143.
Minnis AJ. Chaucer and Pagan Antiquity. Cambridge: Brewer; 1982.
144.
Nolan B. Chaucer’s Poetics of Dwelling in Troilus and Criseyde. Chaucer and the City. Cambridge: Brewer; 2006. p. 57–75.
145.
Nolan B. Chaucer’s Poetics of Dwelling in Troilus and Criseyde. Chaucer and the City [Internet]. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer; 2006. p. 57–76. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=1068968
146.
Patterson L. Troilus and Criseyde and the Subject of History. Chaucer and the Subject of History. London: Routledge; 1991. p. 84–164.
147.
Stanbury S. The Voyeur and the Private Life in Troilus and Criseyde. Studies in the Age of Chaucer. Norman, Okla: New Chaucer Society, University of Oklahoma; 1991;13:141–158.
148.
Stanbury S. Women’s Letters and Private Space in Chaucer. Exemplaria. Medieval; 1994;6(2):271–285.
149.
Windeatt B. Troilus and Criseyde. Oxford: Clarendon; 1992.
150.
Knighton H, Martin GH. Knighton’s Chronicle, 1337-1396. Oxford: Clarendon; 1995.
151.
Langland W, Schmidt AVC. Piers Plowman: A Critical Edition of the B-text. London: Dent; 1995.
152.
Aers D. Vox Populi and the Literature of 1381. The Cambridge History of Medieval English Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999. p. 432–453.
153.
Aers D. Vox Populi and the Literature of 1381. The Cambridge History of Medieval English Literature [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999. p. 432–453. Available from: http://ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521444200
154.
Crane S. The Writing Lesson of 1381. Chaucer’s England: Literature in Historical Context. Minneapolis, Minn: University of Minnesota Press; 1992. p. 201–221.
155.
Crane S. The Writing Lesson of 1381. Chaucer’s England: Literature in Historical Context [Internet]. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 1992. p. 201–221. Available from: http://ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.ctttt6q6
156.
Hudson A. Piers Plowman and the Peasants’ Revolt: A Problem Revisited. The Yearbook of Langland Studies [Internet]. Colleagues Press; 1994;8:85–106. Available from: http://www.brepolsonline.net/doi/abs/10.1484/J.YLS.2.302842
157.
Justice S. Writing and Rebellion: England in 1381. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1994.
158.
Justice S. Writing and Rebellion: England in 1381 [Internet]. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1994. Available from: https://ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/login?url=https://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.01212
159.
Ormrod WM. In Bed with Joan of Kent: The King’s Mother and the Peasants’ Revolt. Medieval Women: Texts and Contexts in Late Medieval Britain : Essays for Felicity Riddy. Turnhout: Brepols; 2000. p. 277–292.
160.
Pearsall D. Interpretative Models for the Peasants’ Revolt. Hermeneutics and Medieval Culture. Albany: State University of New York Press; 1989. p. 63–70.
161.
Chaucer G, Mann J. The Nun’s Priest’s Tale. The Canterbury Tales. London: Penguin; 2005.
162.
Gower J. Vox Clamantis. The Major Latin Works of John Gower. Seattle, [Wash.]: University of Washington Press; 1962. p. 49–95.
163.
Arner L. History Lessons from the End of Time: Gower and the English Rising of 1381. Clio [Internet]. Indiana University, Purdue University of Fort Wayn; 2002;31(3):237–255. Available from: http://literature.proquest.com/searchCritRef.do?DurUrl=Yes&listType=crit_all&value(Searchin)=ftonly&forward=criticism&value(PubDate1)=20020000&value(Title)=History%20Lessons%20from%20the%20End%20of%20Time&value(ISSN)=0884-2043&value(PubDate2)=20020000&value(Author)=Arner%2C%20Lynn
164.
Bahr AW. Reading Codicological Form in John Gower’s Trentham Manuscript. Studies in the Age of Chaucer. 2011;33(1):219–262.
165.
Benson CD. Some Poets’ Tours of Medieval London: Varieties of Literary Urban Experience. Essays in Medieval Studies [Internet]. West Virginia University; 2008;24(1):1–20. Available from: https://muse.jhu.edu/article/239732
166.
Boitani P. "My Tale Is of a Cock”, Or, the Problems of Literal Interpretation. In: Newhauser R, Alford JA, editors. Literature and Religion in the Later Middle Ages: Philological Studies in Honor of Siegfried Wenzel. [Charleston]: Nabu; 2012. p. 25–42.
167.
Cornelius I. Gower and the Peasants’ Revolt. Representations. 2015;131(1):22–51.
168.
Crane S. The Writing Lesson of 1381. Chaucer’s England: Literature in Historical Context. Minneapolis, Minn: University of Minnesota Press; 1992. p. 201–221.
169.
Crane S. The Writing Lesson of 1381. Chaucer’s England: Literature in Historical Context [Internet]. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 1992. p. 201–221. Available from: http://ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.ctttt6q6
170.
Davis I. Calling: Langland, Gower, and Chaucer on Saint Paul. Studies in the Age of Chaucer. 2012;34(1):53–97.
171.
Ganim JM. Gower, Liminality, and the Politics of Space. Exemplaria. 2007;19(1):90–116.
172.
Grady F. The Lancastrian Gower and the Limits of Exemplarity. Speculum. 1995;70(3).
173.
Olsson KO. John Gower’s ‘Vox Clamantis’ and the Medieval Idea of Place. Studies in Philology [Internet]. 1987;84(2):134–158. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4174264?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
174.
Marshall C. Figuring the Dangers of the "Greet Forneys”: Chaucer and Gower’S Timely (Mis)Reporting of the Peasant Voice. Comitatus: A Journal of Medieval and Renaissance Studies. 2015;46(1):75–97.
175.
Pearsall D. Interpretative Models for the Peasants’ Revolt. Hermeneutics and Medieval Culture. Albany: State University of New York Press; 1989. p. 63–70.
176.
Rigg AG, Moore ES. The Latin Works: Politics, Lament, and Praise. A Companion to Gower. Cambridge: Brewer; 2004. p. 153–164.
177.
Rigg AG, Moore ES. The Latin Works: Politics, Lament, and Praise. A Companion to Gower [Internet]. D. S. Brewer; 2005. p. 153–164. Available from: https://www-dawsonera-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/abstract/9781846153877
178.
Scanlon L. The Authority of Fable: Allegory and Irony in the Nun’s Priest’s Tale. Exemplaria. Medieval; 1989;1(1):43–68.
179.
Watt D. Amoral Gower: Language, Sex, and Politics. University of Minnesota Press; 2003.
180.
Watt D. Amoral Gower: Language, Sex, and Politics [Internet]. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 2003. Available from: https://ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.ctttv946
181.
Boffey J. London Books and London Readers. Cultural Reformations: Medieval and Renaissance in Literary History. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010. p. 420–437.
182.
Julia Boffey. Manuscript and Print in London c. 1475-1530. The British Library Publishing Division; 2012.
183.
Boffey J, Meale CM. Selecting the Text: Rawlinson C. 86 and Some Other Books for London Readers. Regionalism in Late Medieval Manuscripts and Texts: Essays Celebrating the Publication of A Linguistic Atlas of Late Medieval English. Cambridge: Brewer; 1991. p. 143–169.
184.
Christianson CP. The Rise of London’s Book Trade. The Cambridge History of the Book in Britain: Vol 3: 1400-1557. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999. p. 128–147.
185.
Christianson CP. The Rise of London’s Book Trade. The Cambridge History of the Book in Britain: Vol 3: 1400-1557 [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999. p. 128–147. Available from: http://ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521573467
186.
Hanna R. London Literature, 1300-1380. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005.
187.
Hanna R. London Literature, 1300-1380 [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005. Available from: https://royalholloway.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Holloway&isbn=9780511299070&uid=^u
188.
Kisby. Books in London Parish Churches Before 1603: Some Preliminary Observations. The Church and Learning in Late Medieval Society Studies in Honour of Professor R B Dobson. Donington: Shaun Tyas; 2002. p. 305–326.
189.
Lindenbaum S. London Texts and Literate Practice. The Cambridge History of Medieval English Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999. p. 284–309.
190.
Lindenbaum S. London Texts and Literate Practice. The Cambridge History of Medieval English Literature [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999. p. 284–309. Available from: http://ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521444200
191.
Mary-Rose McLaren. The London Chronicles of the Fifteenth Century: A Revolution in English Writing. With an annotated edition of Bradford, West Yorkshire Archives MS ... Archives MS 32D86/42 Annotated Edition. D.S.Brewer; 2002.
192.
Meale CM. The Libelle of Englyshe Polycye and Mercantile Literary Culture in Late-Medieval London. London and Europe in the Later Middle Ages. London: Centre for Medieval and Renaissance Studies; 1995. p. 181–227.
193.
Mooney LR. Vernacular Literary Manuscripts and Their Scribes. The Production of Books in England, 1350-1500. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011. p. 192–211.
194.
Mooney LR. Vernacular Literary Manuscripts and Their Scribes. The Production of Books in England, 1350-1500 [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011. p. 192–211. Available from: https://www-vlebooks-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/Vleweb/Product/Index/2023655?page=0
195.
Mooney LR, Stubbs E. Scribes and the City: London Guildhall Clerks and the Dissemination of Middle English Literature, 1375-1425. Woodbridge, Suffolk: York Medieval Press; 2013.
196.
Robinson PR. A ‘Prik of Conscience Cheyned:’ the Parish Library of St Margaret’s, New Fish Street, London, 1472. The Medieval Book and a Modern Collector Essays in Honour of Toshiyuki Takamiya. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer; 2004. p. 209–221.
197.
Scase W. Reginald Pecock, John Carpenter and John Colop’s ‘Common-Profit’ Books: Aspects of Book Ownership and Circulation in Fifteenth-Century London. Medium Ævum [Internet]. [Oxford?]: Society for the Study of Mediæval Languages and Literature [etc.]; 1992;61(2):261–274. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/43629433?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
198.
Hoccleve T. ‘My Compleinte’ and ‘A Dialoge’. 'My Compleinte’ and Other Poems. Exeter: University of Exeter Press; 2001. p. 115–159.
199.
Benson CD. Some Poets’ Tours of Medieval London: Varieties of Literary Urban Experience. Essays in Medieval Studies [Internet]. West Virginia University; 2008;24(1):1–20. Available from: https://muse.jhu.edu/article/239732
200.
Bowers JM. Thomas Hoccleve and the Politics of Tradition. The Chaucer Review [Internet]. Pennsylvania State University Press.; 2002;36(4):352–369. Available from: https://muse.jhu.edu/article/8500
201.
Clifton Brown M. ‘Lo, Heer the Fourme’: Hoccleve’s Series, Formulary, and Bureaucratic Textuality. Exemplaria [Internet]. Medieval; 2011;23(1):27–49. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1179/104125711X12864610741701
202.
Cole A. Thomas Hoccleve’s Heretics. Literature and Heresy in the Age of Chaucer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010. p. 103–130.
203.
Cole A. Thomas Hoccleve’s Heretics. Literature and Heresy in the Age of Chaucer [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010. p. 103–130. Available from: https://www-vlebooks-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/Vleweb/Product/Index/2000599?page=0
204.
Gayk S. Thomas Hoccleve’s Spectacles. Image, Text, and Religious Reform in Fifteenth-Century England. Cambridge University Press; 2010. p. 45–83.
205.
Gayk S. Thomas Hoccleve’s Spectacles. Image, Text, and Religious Reform in Fifteenth-Century England [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010. p. 45–83. Available from: https://www-vlebooks-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/Vleweb/Product/Index/2001042?page=0
206.
Goldie MB. Psychosomatic Illness and Identity in London, 1416-1421: Hoccleve’s Complaint and Dialogue with a Friend. Exemplaria [Internet]. Medieval; 1999;11(1):23–52. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1179/exm.1999.11.1.23
207.
Hasler AJ. Hoccleve’s Unregimented Body. Paragraph [Internet]. Edinburgh University PressEdinburgh University Press; 1990;13(2):164–183. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/43151716?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
208.
Johnson E. Hoccleve and the Convention of Mixed-Form Protrepsis. Practicing Literary Theory in the Middle Ages: Ethics and the Mixed Form in Chaucer, Gower, Usk, and Hoccleve [Internet]. London: Chicago; 2013. p. 202–231. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=1183452
209.
Johnson E. Hoccleve and the Convention of Mixed-Form Protrepsis. Practicing Literary Theory in the Middle Ages: Ethics and the Mixed Form in Chaucer, Gower, Usk, and Hoccleve [Internet]. London: Chicago; 2013. p. 202–231. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=1183452
210.
Knapp E. The Bureaucratic Muse: Thomas Hoccleve and the Literature of Late Medieval England. University Park, Pa: Pennsylvania State University Press; 2001.
211.
Lawton D. Public Interiorities. A Handbook of Middle English Studies. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2013. p. 93–107.
212.
Lawton D. Public Interiorities. A Handbook of Middle English Studies [Internet]. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2013. p. 93–108. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=1120938
213.
Lindenbaum S. Thomas Hoccleve. In: Boffey J, Edwards ASG, editors. A Companion to Fifteenth-Century English Poetry. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer; 2013. p. 35–45.
214.
Lindenbaum S. Thomas Hoccleve. A Companion to Fifteenth-Century English Poetry [Internet]. Woodbridge, Suffolk: D.S. Brewer; 2013. p. 35–45. Available from: https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=1190552
215.
F. McNamara R, Feros Ruys J. Unlocking the Silences of the Self-Murdered: Textual Approaches to Suicidal Emotions in the Middle Ages. Exemplaria. 2014;26(1):58–80.
216.
Meyer-Lee RJ. Hoccleve and the Apprehension of Money. Exemplaria [Internet]. Medieval; 2001;13(1):173–214. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1179/exm.2001.13.1.173
217.
Meyer-Lee RJ. Thomas Hoccleve: Beggar Laureate. Poets and Power from Chaucer to Wyatt. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009. p. 88–124.
218.
Meyer-Lee RJ. Thomas Hoccleve: Beggar Laureate. Poets and Power from Chaucer to Wyatt [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009. p. 88–124. Available from: https://www-vlebooks-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/Vleweb/Product/Index/2005037?page=0
219.
Mooney LR. A Holograph Copy of Thomas Hoccleve’s Regiment of Princes. Studies in the Age of Chaucer. 2011;33(1):263–296.
220.
Patterson L. ‘What is Me?’: Self and Society in the Poetry of Thomas Hoccleve. Studies in the Age of Chaucer [Internet]. Norman, Okla.: New Chaucer Society, University of Oklahoma; 2001;23:437–470. Available from: https://muse.jhu.edu/article/586999/pdf
221.
Scanlon L. Nothing But Change and Variance: The Problem of Hoccleve’s Politics. The Chaucer Review [Internet]. Penn State University Press; 2014;48(4):504–523. Available from: https://muse.jhu.edu/journals/chaucer_review/v048/48.4.scanlon.html
222.
Sugito H. Rereading Hoccleve’s Series: The Limits of Language and Experience. The Journal of Medieval Religious Cultures [Internet]. Penn State University Press; 2013;39(1):43–59. Available from: https://muse.jhu.edu/journals/journal_of_medieval_religious_cultures/v039/39.1.sugito.html
223.
Tolmie S. The Professional: Thomas Hoccleve. Studies in the Age of Chaucer [Internet]. Norman, Okla.: New Chaucer Society, University of Oklahoma; 2007;29:341–373. Available from: https://muse.jhu.edu/article/587354/pdf
224.
Usk T, Shoaf RA. The Testament of Love. Kalamazoo, Mich: Published for TEAMS (the Consortium for the Teaching of the Middle Ages) in association with the University of Rochester by Medieval Institute Publications, Western Michigan University; 1998.
225.
Usk T, Shoaf (ed.) RA. Appendix 2: Appeal of Thomas Usk against John Northampton. The Testament of Love. Kalamazoo, Mich: Published for TEAMS (the Consortium for the Teaching of the Middle Ages) in association with the University of Rochester by Medieval Institute Publications, Western Michigan University; 1998. p. 423–429.
226.
Chambers RW, Daunt M, Weale MM. A Book of London English, 1384-1425. Oxford: Clarendon; 1931.
227.
The Testament of Love -- Translated [Internet]. Available from: http://users.clas.ufl.edu/ras/modusk/musk/master.htm
228.
Arch J. The Boethian ‘Testament of Love’. Studies in Philology [Internet]. University of North Carolina PressUniversity of North Carolina Press; 2008;105(4):448–462. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20464333?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
229.
Davis I. Them and Usk: Writing Home in the Middle Ages. Writing Masculinity in the Later Middle Ages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009. p. 38–75.
230.
Epstein R. Prisoners of Reflection: The Fifteenth-Century Poetry of Exile and Imprisonment. Exemplaria. 2003;15(1):159–198.
231.
Galloway A. Private Selves and the Intellectual Marketplace in Late Fourteenth-Century England: The Case of the Two Usks. New Literary History [Internet]. The Johns Hopkins University PressThe Johns Hopkins University Press; 1997;28(2):291–318. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20057417?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
232.
Galloway A. The Account Book and the Treasure: Gilbert Maghfeld’s Textual Economy and the Poetics of Mercantile Accounting in Ricardian Literature. Studies in the Age of Chaucer. 2011;33(1):65–124.
233.
Hayton HR. ‘Many Privy Thinges Wimpled and Folde’: Governance and Mutual Obligation in Usk’s ‘Testament of Love’. Studies in Philology [Internet]. University of North Carolina PressUniversity of North Carolina Press; 1999;96(1):22–41. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4174626?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
234.
Johnson E. Political Protrepsis: Usk and Gower. Practicing Literary Theory in the Middle Ages: Ethics and the Mixed Form in Chaucer, Gower, Usk, and Hoccleve. London: Chicago; 2013. p. 166–201.
235.
Johnson E. Political Protrepsis: Usk and Gower. Practicing Literary Theory in the Middle Ages: Ethics and the Mixed Form in Chaucer, Gower, Usk, and Hoccleve [Internet]. London: Chicago; 2013. p. 166–201. Available from: https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=1183452
236.
McNamara RF. "Diversity in Setting of Words Makes Diversity in Understanding”: Bureaucratic and Political Language in Thomas Usk’s Testament of Love. New Medieval Literatures [Internet]. 2012;14:165–199. Available from: http://www.brepolsonline.net/doi/abs/10.1484/J.NML.1.103190
237.
Medcalf S. The World and Heart of Thomas Usk. Essays on Ricardian Literature: In Honour of John Burrow. Oxford: Clarendon; 1997. p. 222–251.
238.
Nielsen M. Scholastic Persuasion in Thomas Usk’s Testament of Love. Viator [Internet]. 2011;42:183–203. Available from: http://www.brepolsonline.net/doi/abs/10.1484/J.VIATOR.1.102249
239.
Steiner E. Commonality and Literary Form in the 1370s and 1380s. New Medieval Literatures: Vol 6. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003. p. 199–221.
240.
Strohm P. The Textual Vicissitudes of Usk’s "Appeal”. Hochon’s Arrow: The Social Imagination of Fourteenth-Century Texts. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press; 1992. p. 145–160.
241.
Strohm P. Politics and Poetics: Usk and Chaucer in the 1380s. Literary Practice and Social Change in Britain, 1380-1530. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1990. p. 83–112.
242.
Turner M. ‘Certaynly His Noble Sayenges Can I Not Amende’: Thomas Usk and Troilus and Criseyde. The Chaucer Review [Internet]. Penn State University PressPenn State University Press; 2002;37(1):26–39. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25096188?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
243.
Turner M. Ricardian Communities: Thomas Usk’s Social Fantasies. Chaucerian Conflict: Languages of Antagonism in Late Fourteenth-Century London. Oxford: Clarendon; 2007. p. 93–126.
244.
Turner M. Ricardian Communities: Thomas Usk’s Social Fantasies. Chaucerian Conflict: Languages of Antagonism in Late Fourteenth-Century London [Internet]. Oxford: Clarendon; 2007. p. 93–126. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=415153
245.
Turner M. Usk and the Goldsmiths. New Medieval Literatures [Internet]. 2007;9:139–177. Available from: http://www.brepolsonline.net/doi/pdf/10.1484/J.NML.2.302734
246.
Turner M. Thomas Usk and John Arderne. The Chaucer Review [Internet]. Penn State University Press; 2012;47(1):95–105. Available from: https://muse.jhu.edu/article/480690