1.
Gillespie, A., Weare, S.: The English Legal System. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2017).
2.
Holland, J.A., Webb, J.S.: Learning Legal Rules: A Students’ Guide to Legal Method and Reasoning. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2016).
3.
Williams, G.L.: Glanville Williams - learning the law. Sweet & Maxwell, London (2016).
4.
Wacks, R.: Law: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2015).
5.
Wacks, R.: Law: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2015).
6.
Gillespie, A., Weare, S.: The English Legal System. In: The English Legal System. pp. 1–20. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2017).
7.
Wacks, R.: Law: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2015).
8.
Gillespie, A., Weare, S.: Domestic Sources of Law: Parliamentary Material. In: The English Legal System. pp. 21–66. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2017).
9.
Gillespie, A., Weare, S.: Domestic Sources of Law: Case Law. In: The English Legal System. pp. 67–96. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2017).
10.
Gillespie, A., Weare, S.: International Sources of Law. In: The English Legal System. pp. 97–155. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2017).
11.
Gillespie, A., Weare, S.: Human Rights Act 1998. In: The English Legal System. pp. 156–200. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2017).
12.
Gillespie, A., Weare, S.: Lay Justice. In: The English Legal System. pp. 437–461. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2017).
13.
Gillespie, A., Weare, S.: Those in Court. In: The English Legal System. pp. 462–488. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2017).
14.
Gillespie, A., Weare, S.: Access to the Law. In: The English Legal System. pp. 367–396. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2017).
15.
Gillespie, A., Weare, S.: The English Legal System: England. In: The English Legal System. pp. 1–6. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2017).
16.
McLeod, T.I.: Natural Law and Positivism in Context: The Case of the Speluncean Explorers. In: Legal Theory. pp. 32–37. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2012).
17.
McLeod, T.I.: Natural Law and Positivism in Context: The Case of the Speluncean Explorers. In: Legal Theory. pp. 32–37. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2012).
18.
Fuller, L.L.: The Case of the Speluncean Explorers. Harvard Law Review. 62, 616–645 (1949). https://doi.org/10.2307/1336025.
19.
McLeod, T.I.: Natural Law and Positivism in Context: The Case of the Speluncean Explorers. In: Legal Theory. pp. 32–37. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2012).
20.
McLeod, T.I.: Natural Law and Positivism in Context: The Case of the Speluncean Explorers. In: Legal Theory. pp. 32–37. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2012).
21.
Hutchinson, A.C.: Is Eating People Wrong? The Law and Lore of the Sea. In: Is Eating People Wrong?: Great Legal Cases and How They Shaped the World. pp. 13–40. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2011).
22.
Hutchinson, A.C.: Is Eating People Wrong? The Law and Lore of the Sea. In: Is Eating People Wrong?: Great Legal Cases and How They Shaped the World. pp. 13–40. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2011).
23.
McLeod, T.I.: Natural Law and Positivism in Context: The Case of the Speluncean Explorers. In: Legal Theory. pp. 32–37. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2012).
24.
McLeod, T.I.: Natural Law and Positivism in Context: The Case of the Speluncean Explorers. In: Legal Theory. pp. 32–37. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2012).
25.
Paulson, S.L.: Classical Legal Positivism at Nuremberg. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 4, 132–158 (1975).
26.
Hutchinson, A.C.: Law and the End of Life. In: Is Killing People Right: More Great Cases That Shaped the Legal World. pp. 10–26. Cambridge University Press, New York NY (2016).
27.
Hutchinson, A.C.: Law and the End of Life. In: Is Killing People Right: More Great Cases That Shaped the Legal World. pp. 10–26. Cambridge University Press, New York NY (2016).
28.
Wacks, R.: Understanding Jurisprudence: An Introduction to Legal Theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2017).
29.
Wacks, R.: Understanding Jurisprudence: An Introduction to Legal Theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2017).
30.
Gillespie, A., Weare, S.: Domestic Sources of Law: Parliamentary Material. In: The English Legal System. pp. 21–66. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2017).
31.
Pepper (Inspector of Taxes) v Hart [1992] UKHL 3 (26 November 1992), http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/1992/3.html.
32.
Kavanagh, A.: Pepper v Hart and Matters of Constitutional Principle. Law Quarterly Review. 121, 98–122 (2005).
33.
Gillespie, A., Weare, S.: Domestic Sources of Law: Case Law. In: The English Legal System. pp. 67–96. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2017).
34.
Gillespie, A., Weare, S.: International Sources of Law. In: The English Legal System. pp. 97–155. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2017).
35.
Gillespie, A., Weare, S.: Human Rights Act 1998. In: The English Legal System. pp. 156–200. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2017).
36.
Bingham, T.: The Human Rights Act. European Human Rights Law Review. 568–575 (2010).
37.
O’Cinneide, C.: Why Parliamentary Approval for the Triggering of Article 50 TEU Should Be Required as a Matter of Constitutional Principle | UK Constitutional Law Association, https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2016/07/07/colm-ocinneide-why-parliamentary-approval-for-the-triggering-of-article-50-teu-should-be-required-as-a-matter-of-constitutional-principle/.
38.
Gillespie, A., Weare, S.: Lay Justice. In: The English Legal System. pp. 437–461. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2017).
39.
Gillespie, A., Weare, S.: Those in Court. In: The English Legal System. pp. 462–488. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2017).
40.
Crosby, K.: Controlling Devlin’s Jury: What the Jury Thinks, and What the Jury Sees Online. Criminal Law Review. 15–29 (2012).
41.
Quinn, K.: Jury Bias and the European Convention on Human Rights: A Well-Kept Secret? Criminal Law Review. 998–1014 (2004).