1.
Gillespie A, Weare S. The English Legal System. 6th Edition. Oxford University Press; 2017.
2.
Holland JA, Webb JS. Learning Legal Rules: A Students’ Guide to Legal Method and Reasoning. 9th Edition. Oxford University Press; 2016.
3.
Williams GL. Glanville Williams - Learning the Law. Sixteenth edition. (Smith ATH, ed.). Sweet & Maxwell; 2016. http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=13404587430002671&institutionId=2671&customerId=2670
4.
Wacks R. Law: A Very Short Introduction. Vol 180. Second edition. Oxford University Press; 2015.
5.
Wacks R. Law: A Very Short Introduction. Vol 180. Second edition. Oxford University Press; 2015.
6.
Gillespie A, Weare S. The English Legal System. In: The English Legal System. 6th Edition. Oxford University Press; 2017:1-20.
7.
Wacks R. Law: A Very Short Introduction. Vol 180. Second edition. Oxford University Press; 2015.
8.
Gillespie A, Weare S. Domestic Sources of Law: Parliamentary Material. In: The English Legal System. 6th Edition. Oxford University Press; 2017:21-66.
9.
Gillespie A, Weare S. Domestic Sources of Law: Case Law. In: The English Legal System. 6th Edition. Oxford University Press; 2017:67-96.
10.
Gillespie A, Weare S. International Sources of Law. In: The English Legal System. 6th Edition. Oxford University Press; 2017:97-155.
11.
Gillespie A, Weare S. Human Rights Act 1998. In: The English Legal System. 6th Edition. Oxford University Press; 2017:156-200.
12.
Gillespie A, Weare S. Lay Justice. In: The English Legal System. 6th Edition. Oxford University Press; 2017:437-461.
13.
Gillespie A, Weare S. Those in Court. In: The English Legal System. 6th Edition. Oxford University Press; 2017:462-488.
14.
Gillespie A, Weare S. Access to the Law. In: The English Legal System. 6th Edition. Oxford University Press; 2017:367-396.
15.
Gillespie A, Weare S. The English Legal System: England. In: The English Legal System. 6th Edition. Oxford University Press; 2017:1-6.
16.
McLeod TI. Natural Law and Positivism in Context: The Case of the Speluncean Explorers. In: Legal Theory. Vol Palgrave Macmillan Law Masters. 6th Edition. Palgrave Macmillan; 2012:32-37.
17.
McLeod TI. Natural Law and Positivism in Context: The Case of the Speluncean Explorers. In: Legal Theory. Vol Palgrave Macmillan Law Masters. 6th Edition. Palgrave Macmillan; 2012:32-37. https://moodle.royalholloway.ac.uk/mod/resource/view.php?id=258356
18.
Fuller LL. The Case of the Speluncean Explorers. Harvard Law Review. 1949;62(4):616-645. doi:10.2307/1336025
19.
McLeod TI. Natural Law and Positivism in Context: The Case of the Speluncean Explorers. In: Legal Theory. Vol Palgrave Macmillan Law Masters. 6th Edition. Palgrave Macmillan; 2012:32-37.
20.
McLeod TI. Natural Law and Positivism in Context: The Case of the Speluncean Explorers. In: Legal Theory. Vol Palgrave Macmillan Law Masters. 6th Edition. Palgrave Macmillan; 2012:32-37. https://moodle.royalholloway.ac.uk/mod/resource/view.php?id=258356
21.
Hutchinson AC. Is Eating People Wrong? The Law and Lore of the Sea. In: Is Eating People Wrong?: Great Legal Cases and How They Shaped the World. Cambridge University Press; 2011:13-40.
22.
Hutchinson AC. Is Eating People Wrong? The Law and Lore of the Sea. In: Is Eating People Wrong?: Great Legal Cases and How They Shaped the World. Cambridge University Press; 2011:13-40. http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=13410410480002671&institutionId=2671&customerId=2670
23.
McLeod TI. Natural Law and Positivism in Context: The Case of the Speluncean Explorers. In: Legal Theory. Vol Palgrave Macmillan Law Masters. 6th Edition. Palgrave Macmillan; 2012:32-37.
24.
McLeod TI. Natural Law and Positivism in Context: The Case of the Speluncean Explorers. In: Legal Theory. Vol Palgrave Macmillan Law Masters. 6th Edition. Palgrave Macmillan; 2012:32-37. https://moodle.royalholloway.ac.uk/mod/resource/view.php?id=258356
25.
Paulson SL. Classical Legal Positivism at Nuremberg. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 1975;4(2):132-158. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2265160?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
26.
Hutchinson AC. Law and the End of Life. In: Is Killing People Right: More Great Cases That Shaped the Legal World. Cambridge University Press; 2016:10-26. https://moodle.royalholloway.ac.uk/mod/resource/view.php?id=308043
27.
Hutchinson AC. Law and the End of Life. In: Is Killing People Right: More Great Cases That Shaped the Legal World. Cambridge University Press; 2016:10-26.
28.
Wacks R. Understanding Jurisprudence: An Introduction to Legal Theory. Fifth edition. Oxford University Press; 2017.
29.
Wacks R. Understanding Jurisprudence: An Introduction to Legal Theory. Fifth edition. Oxford University Press; 2017.
30.
Gillespie A, Weare S. Domestic Sources of Law: Parliamentary Material. In: The English Legal System. 6th Edition. Oxford University Press; 2017:21-66.
31.
Pepper (Inspector of Taxes) v Hart [1992] UKHL 3 (26 November 1992). http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/1992/3.html
32.
Kavanagh A. Pepper v Hart and Matters of Constitutional Principle. Law Quarterly Review. 2005;121(1):98-122. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=ICC8D24B0E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028
33.
Gillespie A, Weare S. Domestic Sources of Law: Case Law. In: The English Legal System. 6th Edition. Oxford University Press; 2017:67-96.
34.
Gillespie A, Weare S. International Sources of Law. In: The English Legal System. 6th Edition. Oxford University Press; 2017:97-155.
35.
Gillespie A, Weare S. Human Rights Act 1998. In: The English Legal System. 6th Edition. Oxford University Press; 2017:156-200.
36.
Bingham T. The Human Rights Act. European Human Rights Law Review. 2010;(6):568-575. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I74D7C6A2FF5711DFA8BBB4B971939D60
37.
O’Cinneide C. Why Parliamentary Approval for the Triggering of Article 50 TEU Should Be Required as a Matter of Constitutional Principle | UK Constitutional Law Association. Published 2016. https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2016/07/07/colm-ocinneide-why-parliamentary-approval-for-the-triggering-of-article-50-teu-should-be-required-as-a-matter-of-constitutional-principle/
38.
Gillespie A, Weare S. Lay Justice. In: The English Legal System. 6th Edition. Oxford University Press; 2017:437-461.
39.
Gillespie A, Weare S. Those in Court. In: The English Legal System. 6th Edition. Oxford University Press; 2017:462-488.
40.
Crosby K. Controlling Devlin’s Jury: What the Jury Thinks, and What the Jury Sees Online. Criminal Law Review. 2012;(1):15-29. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I756D22E023CD11E186589A9D015CE2A0
41.
Quinn K. Jury Bias and the European Convention on Human Rights: A Well-Kept Secret? Criminal Law Review. 2004;(December):998-1014. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=IA7E8F490E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028