1.
Gillespie A, Weare S. The English Legal System. 6th Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2017.
2.
Holland JA, Webb JS. Learning Legal Rules: A Students’ Guide to Legal Method and Reasoning. 9th Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2016.
3.
Williams GL. Glanville Williams - learning the law [Internet]. Sixteenth edition. Smith ATH, editor. London: Sweet & Maxwell; 2016. Available from: http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=13404587430002671&institutionId=2671&customerId=2670
4.
Wacks R. Law: A Very Short Introduction. Second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015.
5.
Wacks R. Law: A Very Short Introduction. Second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015.
6.
Gillespie A, Weare S. The English Legal System. The English Legal System. 6th Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2017. p. 1–20.
7.
Wacks R. Law: A Very Short Introduction. Second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015.
8.
Gillespie A, Weare S. Domestic Sources of Law: Parliamentary Material. The English Legal System. 6th Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2017. p. 21–66.
9.
Gillespie A, Weare S. Domestic Sources of Law: Case Law. The English Legal System. 6th Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2017. p. 67–96.
10.
Gillespie A, Weare S. International Sources of Law. The English Legal System. 6th Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2017. p. 97–155.
11.
Gillespie A, Weare S. Human Rights Act 1998. The English Legal System. 6th Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2017. p. 156–200.
12.
Gillespie A, Weare S. Lay Justice. The English Legal System. 6th Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2017. p. 437–461.
13.
Gillespie A, Weare S. Those in Court. The English Legal System. 6th Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2017. p. 462–488.
14.
Gillespie A, Weare S. Access to the Law. The English Legal System. 6th Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2017. p. 367–396.
15.
Gillespie A, Weare S. The English Legal System: England. The English Legal System. 6th Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2017. p. 1–6.
16.
McLeod TI. Natural Law and Positivism in Context: The Case of the Speluncean Explorers. Legal Theory. 6th Edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2012. p. 32–37.
17.
McLeod TI. Natural Law and Positivism in Context: The Case of the Speluncean Explorers. Legal Theory [Internet]. 6th Edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2012. p. 32–37. Available from: https://moodle.royalholloway.ac.uk/mod/resource/view.php?id=258356
18.
Fuller LL. The Case of the Speluncean Explorers. Harvard Law Review. 1949;62(4):616–645.
19.
McLeod TI. Natural Law and Positivism in Context: The Case of the Speluncean Explorers. Legal Theory. 6th Edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2012. p. 32–37.
20.
McLeod TI. Natural Law and Positivism in Context: The Case of the Speluncean Explorers. Legal Theory [Internet]. 6th Edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2012. p. 32–37. Available from: https://moodle.royalholloway.ac.uk/mod/resource/view.php?id=258356
21.
Hutchinson AC. Is Eating People Wrong? The Law and Lore of the Sea. Is Eating People Wrong?: Great Legal Cases and How They Shaped the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011. p. 13–40.
22.
Hutchinson AC. Is Eating People Wrong? The Law and Lore of the Sea. Is Eating People Wrong?: Great Legal Cases and How They Shaped the World [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011. p. 13–40. Available from: http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=13410410480002671&institutionId=2671&customerId=2670
23.
McLeod TI. Natural Law and Positivism in Context: The Case of the Speluncean Explorers. Legal Theory. 6th Edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2012. p. 32–37.
24.
McLeod TI. Natural Law and Positivism in Context: The Case of the Speluncean Explorers. Legal Theory [Internet]. 6th Edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2012. p. 32–37. Available from: https://moodle.royalholloway.ac.uk/mod/resource/view.php?id=258356
25.
Paulson SL. Classical Legal Positivism at Nuremberg. Philosophy & Public Affairs [Internet]. Wiley; 1975;4(2):132–158. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2265160?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
26.
Hutchinson AC. Law and the End of Life. Is Killing People Right: More Great Cases That Shaped the Legal World [Internet]. New York NY: Cambridge University Press; 2016. p. 10–26. Available from: https://moodle.royalholloway.ac.uk/mod/resource/view.php?id=308043
27.
Hutchinson AC. Law and the End of Life. Is Killing People Right: More Great Cases That Shaped the Legal World. New York NY: Cambridge University Press; 2016. p. 10–26.
28.
Wacks R. Understanding Jurisprudence: An Introduction to Legal Theory. Fifth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2017.
29.
Wacks R. Understanding Jurisprudence: An Introduction to Legal Theory. Fifth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2017.
30.
Gillespie A, Weare S. Domestic Sources of Law: Parliamentary Material. The English Legal System. 6th Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2017. p. 21–66.
31.
Pepper (Inspector of Taxes) v Hart [1992] UKHL 3 (26 November 1992) [Internet]. Available from: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/1992/3.html
32.
Kavanagh A. Pepper v Hart and Matters of Constitutional Principle. Law Quarterly Review [Internet]. 2005;121(1):98–122. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=ICC8D24B0E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028
33.
Gillespie A, Weare S. Domestic Sources of Law: Case Law. The English Legal System. 6th Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2017. p. 67–96.
34.
Gillespie A, Weare S. International Sources of Law. The English Legal System. 6th Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2017. p. 97–155.
35.
Gillespie A, Weare S. Human Rights Act 1998. The English Legal System. 6th Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2017. p. 156–200.
36.
Bingham T. The Human Rights Act. European Human Rights Law Review [Internet]. 2010;(6):568–575. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I74D7C6A2FF5711DFA8BBB4B971939D60
37.
O’Cinneide C. Why Parliamentary Approval for the Triggering of Article 50 TEU Should Be Required as a Matter of Constitutional Principle | UK Constitutional Law Association [Internet]. 2016. Available from: https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2016/07/07/colm-ocinneide-why-parliamentary-approval-for-the-triggering-of-article-50-teu-should-be-required-as-a-matter-of-constitutional-principle/
38.
Gillespie A, Weare S. Lay Justice. The English Legal System. 6th Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2017. p. 437–461.
39.
Gillespie A, Weare S. Those in Court. The English Legal System. 6th Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2017. p. 462–488.
40.
Crosby K. Controlling Devlin’s Jury: What the Jury Thinks, and What the Jury Sees Online. Criminal Law Review [Internet]. 2012;(1):15–29. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I756D22E023CD11E186589A9D015CE2A0
41.
Quinn K. Jury Bias and the European Convention on Human Rights: A Well-Kept Secret? Criminal Law Review [Internet]. 2004;(December):998–1014. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=IA7E8F490E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028