1.
Lyons, J.D.: French Literature: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010).
2.
Lyons, J.D.: French Literature: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010).
3.
Kay, S., Cave, T., Bowie, M.: A Short History of French Literature. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2003).
4.
Kay, S., Cave, T., Bowie, M.: A Short History of French Literature. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2003).
5.
Hollier, D., Bloch, R.H.: A New History of French Literature. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass (1994).
6.
Hollier, D., Bloch, R.H.: A New History of French Literature. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass (1994).
7.
Mettam, R., Johnson, D.: French History and Society: The Wars of Religion to the Fifth Republic. Methuen, London (1974).
8.
McMillan, J.F.: Modern France: 1880-2002. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2003).
9.
Roberts, M.L.: Civilization Without Sexes: Reconstructing Gender in Postwar France, 1917-1927. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1994).
10.
Roberts, M.L.: Civilization Without Sexes: Reconstructing Gender in Postwar France, 1917-1927. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1994).
11.
Mauriac, F.: Thérèse Desqueyroux. Grasset, Paris (1927).
12.
Claudel, P.: Le Rapport De Brodeck. Librairie generale francaise, Paris (2009).
13.
Mauriac, F., Jenkins, C.: Thérèse Desqueyroux. University of London Press, London (1964).
14.
Claudel, P., Cullen, J.: Brodeck: A Novel. Anchor Books, New York (2010).
15.
Molière: Le Misanthrope. Maxi-livres, [Paris] (2005).
16.
Edmunds, J.: Moliere: Four French Plays: Cinna, the Misanthrope, Andromache, Phaedra. Penguin Books, London (2013).
17.
Gossman, L.: Molière’s ‘Misanthrope’: Melancholy and Society in the Age of the Counterreformation. Theatre Journal. 34, 322–343 (1982). https://doi.org/10.2307/3206923.
18.
Cholakian, P.F.: The ‘Woman Question’ in Molière’s Misanthrope. French Review. 58, 524–532 (1985).
19.
Scanlan, T.: Molière’s Le Misanthrope, 1324. Explicator. 32, 87–89 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1080/00144940.1974.11483236.
20.
Peters, J.N.: The Rhetoric of Adornment in ‘Le Misanthrope.’ The French Review. 75, 708–719 (2002).
21.
Call, M.: Alceste at the Print Shop: Publication and Authorship in Molière’s Le Misanthrope. Romanic Review. 104, 65–82 (2013).
22.
Corbeau, T., Grafigny: Lettres d’une Peruvienne. Flammarion, Paris (2005).
23.
Mallinson, J., de Grafigny, F.: Letters of a Peruvian Woman. Oxford University Press, New York (2009).
24.
Mallinson, G.J., Grafigny: Letters of a Peruvian Woman. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2009).
25.
Roulston, C.: Seeing the Other in Mme de Graffigny’s Lettres d’une Péruvienne. Eighteenth-Century Fiction. 9, 309–326 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1353/ecf.1997.0054.
26.
Fourny, D.R.: Language and Reality in Françoise de Grafigny’s Lettres d’une Péruvienne. Eighteenth-Century Fiction. 4, 221–238 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1353/ecf.1992.0053.
27.
Wolfgang, A.: Intertextual Conversations: The Love-Letter and the Footnote in Madame de Graffigny’s Lettres d’une Péruvienne. Eighteenth-Century Fiction. 10, 15–28 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1353/ecf.1997.0003.
28.
Knauff, B.: Figures of Female Alienation: The Use of Periphrasis in Lettres d’une Péruvienne. Studies in Eighteenth Century Culture. 26, 125–138 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1353/sec.2010.0286.
29.
Kavanagh, T.M.: Reading the Moment and the Moment of Reading in Graffigny’s Lettres d’une peruvienne. Modern Language Quarterly. 55, 125–147 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1215/00267929-55-2-125.
30.
Kaplan, M.S.: Epistolary Silence in Françoise de Graffigny’s Lettres d’une Péruvienne (1747) [open access]. Atlantis. 29, 106–112 (2004).
31.
Howells, R.: The ‘Peruvienne’ and Pathos. French Studies. 55, 453–466 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1093/fs/LV.4.453.
32.
Rutler, T.: Liberté, Égalité, Sororité: The Regime of the Sister in Graffigny’s Lettres d’une Péruvienne. French Forum. 39, 1–15 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1353/frf.2014.0024.
33.
Kol, M.: The « Me » Phenomenon in the Novel "Le Rapport De Brodeck” by Philippe Claudel. Acta Universitatis Danubius: Relationes Internationales. 9, 117–132 (2016).
34.
Duffy, H.: Philippe Claudel’s Brodeck as a parody of the fable or the Holocaust universalized. Holocaust Studies. 1–24 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/17504902.2018.1468669.
35.
Bonnet, D.: Étrangeté Et Étranger Dans L’univers De Philippe Claudel. Carnets: Revue Électronique d’Études Françaises. 1, (2014).
36.
Garfitt, T.: Mauriac, Thérèse Desqueyroux. Grant & Cutler, London (1997).
37.
Roberts, M.L.: Civilization Without Sexes: Reconstructing Gender in Postwar France, 1917-1927. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1994).
38.
Roberts, M.L.: Civilization Without Sexes: Reconstructing Gender in Postwar France, 1917-1927. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1994).
39.
Miller, C.: Therese Desqueyroux, (2012).
40.
Miller, R.H.: The Catholic as Novelist: Graham Greene and François Mauriac. In: Graham Greene: Some Critical Consideration. Univ Pr of Kentucky (1978).
41.
Miller, R.H.: The Catholic as Novelist: Graham Greene and François Mauriac. In: Graham Greene: Some Critical Considerations. University Press of Kentucky, Lexington (2015).
42.
Gallagher, E.J.: ‘Aussi Réelle Que L’autre’: Alterity in Mauriac’s ‘Thérèse Desqueyroux’. Romance Notes. 43, 209–218 (2003).
43.
Imhoff, G.: Thérèse Desqueyroux: Un monstre parmi tant d’autres. Romance Quarterly. 38, 157–167 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1080/08831157.1991.9924934.
44.
Solomon, P.H.: Symbolic Landscape and the Quest for Self in François Mauriac’s. Forum for Modern Language Studies. XXII, 16–21 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1093/fmls/XXII.1.16.
45.
Genz, R.P.: Le Role de la Société Dans L’affaire Therese Desqueyroux. Kentucky Romance Quarterly. 21, 419–427 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1080/03648664.1974.9928072.