1.
Lyons JD. French Literature: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010.
2.
Lyons JD. French Literature: A Very Short Introduction [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=510301
3.
Kay S, Cave T, Bowie M. A Short History of French Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003.
4.
Kay S, Cave T, Bowie M. A Short History of French Literature [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=422806
5.
Hollier D, Bloch RH. A New History of French Literature. 1st Harvard University Press pbk. ed. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press; 1994.
6.
Hollier D, Bloch RH. A New History of French Literature [Internet]. 1st Harvard University Press Paperback Edition. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press; 1994. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.09131
7.
Mettam R, Johnson D. French History and Society: The Wars of Religion to the Fifth Republic. London: Methuen; 1974.
8.
McMillan JF. Modern France: 1880-2002. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003.
9.
Roberts ML. Civilization Without Sexes: Reconstructing Gender in Postwar France, 1917-1927. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1994.
10.
Roberts ML. Civilization Without Sexes: Reconstructing Gender in Postwar France, 1917-1927 [Internet]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1994. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.00495
11.
Mauriac F. Thérèse Desqueyroux. Paris: Grasset; 1927.
12.
Claudel P. Le Rapport De Brodeck. Paris: Librairie generale francaise; 2009.
13.
Mauriac F, Jenkins C. Thérèse Desqueyroux. London: University of London Press; 1964.
14.
Claudel P, Cullen J. Brodeck: A Novel. New York: Anchor Books; 2010.
15.
Molière. Le Misanthrope. [Paris]: Maxi-livres; 2005.
16.
Edmunds J. Moliere: Four French Plays: Cinna, the Misanthrope, Andromache, Phaedra. London: Penguin Books; 2013.
17.
Gossman L. Molière’s ‘Misanthrope’: Melancholy and Society in the Age of the Counterreformation. Theatre Journal. 1982;34(3):322–343.
18.
Cholakian PF. The ‘Woman Question’ in Molière’s Misanthrope. French Review [Internet]. 1985;58(4):524–532. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/392817
19.
Scanlan T. Molière’s Le Misanthrope, 1324. Explicator. 1974;32(6):87–89.
20.
Peters JN. The Rhetoric of Adornment in ‘Le Misanthrope.’ The French Review [Internet]. 2002;75(4):708–719. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3133300
21.
Call M. Alceste at the Print Shop: Publication and Authorship in Molière’s Le Misanthrope. Romanic Review [Internet]. 2013;104(1–2):65–82. Available from: https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/alceste-at-print-shop-publication-authorship/docview/1518507858/se-2?accountid=11455
22.
Corbeau T, Grafigny. Lettres d’une Peruvienne. Paris: Flammarion; 2005.
23.
Mallinson J, de Grafigny F. Letters of a Peruvian Woman. New York: Oxford University Press; 2009.
24.
Mallinson GJ, Grafigny. Letters of a Peruvian Woman [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009. Available from: http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780191548987
25.
Roulston C. Seeing the Other in Mme de Graffigny’s Lettres d’une Péruvienne. Eighteenth-Century Fiction. 1997;9(3):309–326.
26.
Fourny DR. Language and Reality in Françoise de Grafigny’s Lettres d’une Péruvienne. Eighteenth-Century Fiction. 1992;4(3):221–238.
27.
Wolfgang A. Intertextual Conversations: The Love-Letter and the Footnote in Madame de Graffigny’s Lettres d’une Péruvienne. Eighteenth-Century Fiction. 1997;10(1):15–28.
28.
Knauff B. Figures of Female Alienation: The Use of Periphrasis in Lettres d’une Péruvienne. Studies in Eighteenth Century Culture. 1997;26(1):125–138.
29.
Kavanagh TM. Reading the Moment and the Moment of Reading in Graffigny’s Lettres d’une peruvienne. Modern Language Quarterly. 1994;55(2):125–147.
30.
Kaplan MS. Epistolary Silence in Françoise de Graffigny’s Lettres d’une Péruvienne (1747). Atlantis [Internet]. 2004;29(1):106–112. Available from: http://journals.msvu.ca/index.php/atlantis/article/view/1178/1112
31.
Howells R. The ‘Peruvienne’ and Pathos. French Studies. 2001;55(4):453–466.
32.
Rutler T. Liberté, Égalité, Sororité: The Regime of the Sister in Graffigny’s Lettres d’une Péruvienne. French Forum. 2014;39(2–3):1–15.
33.
Kol M. The « Me » Phenomenon in the Novel "Le Rapport De Brodeck” by Philippe Claudel. Acta Universitatis Danubius: Relationes Internationales [Internet]. 2016;9(2):117–132. Available from: http://journals.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/internationalis/article/view/3794
34.
Duffy H. Philippe Claudel’s Brodeck as a parody of the fable or the Holocaust universalized. Holocaust Studies. 2018;1–24.
35.
Bonnet D. Étrangeté Et Étranger Dans L’univers De Philippe Claudel. Carnets: Revue Électronique d’Études Françaises [Internet]. 2014;1. Available from: https://journals.openedition.org/carnets/1145
36.
Garfitt T. Mauriac, Thérèse Desqueyroux. 2nd ed. London: Grant & Cutler; 1997.
37.
Roberts ML. Civilization Without Sexes: Reconstructing Gender in Postwar France, 1917-1927. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1994.
38.
Roberts ML. Civilization Without Sexes: Reconstructing Gender in Postwar France, 1917-1927 [Internet]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1994. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.00495
39.
Miller C. Therese Desqueyroux. 2012.
40.
Miller RH. The Catholic as Novelist: Graham Greene and François Mauriac. Graham Greene: Some Critical Consideration. Univ Pr of Kentucky; 1978.
41.
Miller RH. The Catholic as Novelist: Graham Greene and François Mauriac. Graham Greene: Some Critical Considerations [Internet]. 1st ed. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky; 2015. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=1915009
42.
Gallagher EJ. ‘Aussi Réelle Que L’autre’: Alterity in Mauriac’s ‘Thérèse Desqueyroux’. Romance Notes [Internet]. 2003;43(2):209–218. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/43802710
43.
Imhoff G. Thérèse Desqueyroux: Un monstre parmi tant d’autres. Romance Quarterly. 1991;38(2):157–167.
44.
Solomon PH. Symbolic Landscape and the Quest for Self in François Mauriac’s. Forum for Modern Language Studies. 1986;XXII(1):16–21.
45.
Genz RP. Le Role de la Société Dans L’affaire Therese Desqueyroux. Kentucky Romance Quarterly. 1974;21(4):419–427.