1.
Lyons JD. French Literature: A Very Short Introduction. Vol Very Short Introductions. Oxford University Press; 2010.
2.
Lyons JD. French Literature: A Very Short Introduction. Vol Very short introductions. Oxford University Press; 2010. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=510301
3.
Kay S, Cave T, Bowie M. A Short History of French Literature. Oxford University Press; 2003.
4.
Kay S, Cave T, Bowie M. A Short History of French Literature. Oxford University Press; 2003. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=422806
5.
Hollier D, Bloch RH. A New History of French Literature. 1st Harvard University Press pbk. ed. Harvard University Press; 1994.
6.
Hollier D, Bloch RH. A New History of French Literature. 1st Harvard University Press Paperback Edition. Harvard University Press; 1994. http://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.09131
7.
Mettam R, Johnson D. French History and Society: The Wars of Religion to the Fifth Republic. Vol University Paperbacks. Methuen; 1974.
8.
McMillan JF. Modern France: 1880-2002. Vol The Short Oxford History of France. Oxford University Press; 2003.
9.
Roberts ML. Civilization Without Sexes: Reconstructing Gender in Postwar France, 1917-1927. University of Chicago Press; 1994.
10.
Roberts ML. Civilization Without Sexes: Reconstructing Gender in Postwar France, 1917-1927. University of Chicago Press; 1994. http://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.00495
11.
Mauriac F. Thérèse Desqueyroux. Grasset; 1927.
12.
Claudel P. Le Rapport De Brodeck. Librairie generale francaise; 2009.
13.
Mauriac F, Jenkins C. Thérèse Desqueyroux. University of London Press; 1964.
14.
Claudel P, Cullen J. Brodeck: A Novel. Anchor Books; 2010.
15.
Molière. Le Misanthrope. Vol Maxi-poche théâtre. Maxi-livres; 2005.
16.
Edmunds J. Moliere: Four French Plays: Cinna, the Misanthrope, Andromache, Phaedra. Vol Penguin Classics. Penguin Books; 2013.
17.
Gossman L. Molière’s ‘Misanthrope’: Melancholy and Society in the Age of the Counterreformation. Theatre Journal. 1982;34(3):322-343. doi:10.2307/3206923
18.
Cholakian PF. The ‘Woman Question’ in Molière’s Misanthrope. French Review. 1985;58(4):524-532. https://www.jstor.org/stable/392817
19.
Scanlan T. Molière’s Le Misanthrope, 1324. Explicator. 1974;32(6):87-89. doi:10.1080/00144940.1974.11483236
20.
Peters JN. The Rhetoric of Adornment in ‘Le Misanthrope.’ The French Review. 2002;75(4):708-719. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3133300
21.
Call M. Alceste at the Print Shop: Publication and Authorship in Molière’s Le Misanthrope. Romanic Review. 2013;104(1-2):65-82. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/alceste-at-print-shop-publication-authorship/docview/1518507858/se-2?accountid=11455
22.
Corbeau T, Grafigny. Lettres d’une Peruvienne. Flammarion; 2005.
23.
Mallinson J, de Grafigny F. Letters of a Peruvian Woman. Vol Oxford world’s classics. Oxford University Press; 2009.
24.
Mallinson GJ, Grafigny. Letters of a Peruvian Woman. Oxford University Press; 2009. http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780191548987
25.
Roulston C. Seeing the Other in Mme de Graffigny’s Lettres d’une Péruvienne. Eighteenth-Century Fiction. 1997;9(3):309-326. doi:10.1353/ecf.1997.0054
26.
Fourny DR. Language and Reality in Françoise de Grafigny’s Lettres d’une Péruvienne. Eighteenth-Century Fiction. 1992;4(3):221-238. doi:10.1353/ecf.1992.0053
27.
Wolfgang A. Intertextual Conversations: The Love-Letter and the Footnote in Madame de Graffigny’s Lettres d’une Péruvienne. Eighteenth-Century Fiction. 1997;10(1):15-28. doi:10.1353/ecf.1997.0003
28.
Knauff B. Figures of Female Alienation: The Use of Periphrasis in Lettres d’une Péruvienne. Studies in Eighteenth Century Culture. 1997;26(1):125-138. doi:10.1353/sec.2010.0286
29.
Kavanagh TM. Reading the Moment and the Moment of Reading in Graffigny’s Lettres d’une peruvienne. Modern Language Quarterly. 1994;55(2):125-147. doi:10.1215/00267929-55-2-125
30.
Kaplan MS. Epistolary Silence in Françoise de Graffigny’s Lettres d’une Péruvienne (1747) [open access]. Atlantis. 2004;29(1):106-112. http://journals.msvu.ca/index.php/atlantis/article/view/1178/1112
31.
Howells R. The ‘Peruvienne’ and Pathos. French Studies. 2001;55(4):453-466. doi:10.1093/fs/LV.4.453
32.
Rutler T. Liberté, Égalité, Sororité: The Regime of the Sister in Graffigny’s Lettres d’une Péruvienne. French Forum. 2014;39(2-3):1-15. doi:10.1353/frf.2014.0024
33.
Kol M. The « Me » Phenomenon in the Novel "Le Rapport De Brodeck” by Philippe Claudel. Acta Universitatis Danubius: Relationes Internationales. 2016;9(2):117-132. http://journals.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/internationalis/article/view/3794
34.
Duffy H. Philippe Claudel’s Brodeck as a parody of the fable or the Holocaust universalized. Holocaust Studies. Published online 2018:1-24. doi:10.1080/17504902.2018.1468669
35.
Bonnet D. Étrangeté Et Étranger Dans L’univers De Philippe Claudel. Carnets: Revue Électronique d’Études Françaises. 2014;1. https://journals.openedition.org/carnets/1145
36.
Garfitt T. Mauriac, Thérèse Desqueyroux. Vol 90. 2nd ed. Grant & Cutler; 1997.
37.
Roberts ML. Civilization Without Sexes: Reconstructing Gender in Postwar France, 1917-1927. University of Chicago Press; 1994.
38.
Roberts ML. Civilization Without Sexes: Reconstructing Gender in Postwar France, 1917-1927. University of Chicago Press; 1994. http://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.00495
39.
Miller C. Therese Desqueyroux. Published online 2012.
40.
Miller RH. The Catholic as Novelist: Graham Greene and François Mauriac. In: Graham Greene: Some Critical Consideration. Univ Pr of Kentucky; 1978.
41.
Miller RH. The Catholic as Novelist: Graham Greene and François Mauriac. In: Graham Greene: Some Critical Considerations. 1st ed. University Press of Kentucky; 2015. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=1915009
42.
Gallagher EJ. ‘Aussi Réelle Que L’autre’: Alterity in Mauriac’s ‘Thérèse Desqueyroux’. Romance Notes. 2003;43(2):209-218. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43802710
43.
Imhoff G. Thérèse Desqueyroux: Un monstre parmi tant d’autres. Romance Quarterly. 1991;38(2):157-167. doi:10.1080/08831157.1991.9924934
44.
Solomon PH. Symbolic Landscape and the Quest for Self in François Mauriac’s. Forum for Modern Language Studies. 1986;XXII(1):16-21. doi:10.1093/fmls/XXII.1.16
45.
Genz RP. Le Role de la Société Dans L’affaire Therese Desqueyroux. Kentucky Romance Quarterly. 1974;21(4):419-427. doi:10.1080/03648664.1974.9928072