1.
Dennett D. The Illusion of Consciousness [Internet]. 2007. Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fjbWr3ODbAo
2.
Bradshaw JL, Mattingley JB. Clinical Neuropsychology: Behavioral and Brain Science. In: Clinical Neuropsychology: Behavioral and Brain Science. San Diego: Academic Press; 1995.
3.
Dennett D. Consciousness: More like Fame than Television [Internet]. 1996. Available from: http://pp.kpnet.fi/seirioa/cdenn/concfame.htm
4.
Berti A, Bottini G. Shared Cortical Anatomy for Motor Awareness and Motor Control. Science [Internet]. 2005;309(5733):488–91. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3842242
5.
Dennett DC. Consciousness Explained. London: Allen Lane; 1991.
6.
Dennett D. Filling in Versus Finding Out: A Ubiquitous Confusion in Cognitive Science. In: Cognition: conceptual and methodological issues. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 1992.
7.
Churchland PS, Ramachandran VS. Filling In: Why Dennett Is Wrong. In: Perception. New York: Oxford University Press; 1996.
8.
Churchland PS, Ramachandran VS. Filling In: Why Dennett Is Wrong. In: Perception [Internet]. New York: Oxford University Press; 1996. Available from: http://ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780195359169
9.
Halligan PW. Completion in Visuo-Spatial Neglect: A Case Study. Neurocase. 1997;3(5):395–403. doi:10.1093/neucas/3.5.395-j
10.
McKay R, Tamagni C, Palla A, Krummenacher P, Hegemann SCA, Straumann D, et al. Vestibular Stimulation Attenuates Unrealistic Optimism. Cortex. 2013;49(8):2272–5. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2013.04.005
11.
Ramachandran VS. Anosognosia in Parietal Lobe Syndrome. Consciousness and Cognition. 1995;4(1):22–51. doi:10.1006/ccog.1995.1002
12.
Rode G, Charles N, Perenin MT, Vighetto A, Trillet M, Aimard G. Partial Remission of Hemiplegia and Somatoparaphrenia Through Vestibular Stimulation in a Case of Unilateral Neglect. Cortex. 1992;28(2):203–8. doi:10.1016/S0010-9452(13)80048-2
13.
Walker R, Mattingley JB. Ghosts in the Machine? Pathological Visual Completion Phenomena in the Damaged Brain. Neurocase. 1997;3(5):313–35. doi:10.1080/13554799708411972
14.
Walker R, Young AW. Object-Based Neglect: An Investigation of the Contributions of Eye Movements and Perceptual Completion. Cortex [Internet]. 1996;32(2):279–95. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010945296800517
15.
Weil RS, Plant GT, James-Galton M, Rees G. Neural Correlates of Hemianopic Completion Across the Vertical Meridian. Neuropsychologia. 2009;47(2):457–64. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.09.020
16.
Young AW, Hellawell DJ, Welch J. Neglect and Visual Recognition. Brain. 1992;115(1):51–71. doi:10.1093/brain/115.1.51
17.
Kingstone A. Taking a Real Look at Social Attention. Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 2009;19(1):52–6. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2009.05.004
18.
Langton SRH, Watt RJ, Bruce V. Do the Eyes Have It? Cues to the Direction of Social Attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2000;4(2):50–9. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01436-9
19.
Nummenmaa L, Calder AJ. Neural Mechanisms of Social Attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2009;13(3):135–43. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2008.12.006
20.
Calder AJ, Beaver JD, Winston JS, Dolan RJ, Jenkins R, Eger E, et al. Separate Coding of Different Gaze Directions in the Superior Temporal Sulcus and Inferior Parietal Lobule. Current Biology. 2007;17(1):20–5. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2006.10.052
21.
Driver J, Davis G, Ricciardelli P, Kidd P, Maxwell E, Baron-Cohen S. Gaze Perception Triggers Reflexive Visuospatial Orienting. Visual Cognition. 1999;6(5):509–40. doi:10.1080/135062899394920
22.
Eriksen CW, St. James JD. Visual Attention Within and Around the Field of Focal Attention: A Zoom Lens Model. Perception & Psychophysics. 1986;40(4):225–40. doi:10.3758/BF03211502
23.
Findlay JM, Gilchrist ID. Active Vision: The Psychology of Looking and Seeing. Oxford Psychology Series. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003.
24.
Friesen CK, Kingstone A. The Eyes Have It! Reflexive Orienting Is Triggered by Nonpredictive Gaze. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 1998;5(3):490–5. doi:10.3758/BF03208827
25.
Freisen CK, Kingstone A. Inhibition of Return and Reflexive Attention to Gaze Direction [open access]. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience [Internet]. 1999. Available from: http://cognet2.mit.edu/library/conferences/paper?paper_id=4332
26.
Henderson JM. Visual Attention and Eye Movement Control During Reading and Picture Viewing. In: Eye Movements and Visual Cognition: Scene Perception and Reading. Softcover reprint of the original 1st ed. 1992. New York, NY: Springer; 1992.
27.
Jenkins R, Beaver JD. I Thought You Were Looking at Me: Direction-Specific Aftereffects in Gaze Perception. Psychological Science [Internet]. 2006;17(6):506–13. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40064401?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
28.
Findlay JM, Gilchrist ID. Active Vision: The Psychology of Looking and Seeing. Oxford Psychology Series. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003.
29.
Biederman I. Perceiving Real-World Scenes. Science [Internet]. 1972;177(4043):77–80. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1733939?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
30.
Fei-Fei A, Iyer C, Pietro P. What Do We Perceive in a Glance of a Real-World Scene?[open access]. Journal of Vision [Internet]. 2007;7(1). Available from: http://jov.arvojournals.org/article.aspx?articleid=2192891
31.
Henderson J. Human Gaze Control During Real-World Scene Perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2003;7(11):498–504. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2003.09.006
32.
Henderson JM, Weeks PA, Hollingworth A. The Effects of Semantic Consistency on Eye Movements During Complex Scene Viewing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance [Internet]. 1999;25(1):210–28. Available from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=pdh&AN=1999-00001-015&site=ehost-live
33.
Henderson JM, Hollingworth A. High-Level Scene Perception. Annual Review of Psychology. 1999;50(1):243–71. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.243
34.
Itti L, Koch C. A Saliency-Based Search Mechanism for Overt and Covert Shifts of Visual Attention. Vision Research. 2000;40(10–12):1489–506. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(99)00163-7
35.
Itti L, Koch C. Computational Modelling of Visual Attention. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2001;2(3):194–203. doi:10.1038/35058500
36.
Loftus GR, Mackworth NH. Cognitive Determinants of Fixation Location During Picture Viewing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 1978;4(4):565–72. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.4.4.565
37.
Parkhurst D, Law K, Niebur E. Modeling the Role of Salience in the Allocation of Overt Visual Attention. Vision Research. 2002;42(1):107–23. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00250-4
38.
Righart R, De Gelder B. Recognition of Facial Expressions Is Influenced by Emotional Scene Gist. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience. 2008;8(3):264–72. doi:10.3758/CABN.8.3.264
39.
Rousselet G, Joubert O, Fabre-Thorpe M. How Long to Get to the "Gist” of Real-World Natural Scenes? Visual Cognition. 2005;12(6):852–77. doi:10.1080/13506280444000553
40.
Tatler BW, Baddeley RJ, Gilchrist ID. Visual Correlates of Fixation Selection: Effects of Scale and Time. Vision Research. 2005;45(5):643–59. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2004.09.017
41.
Tatler BW, Wade NJ. Yarbus, Eye Movements, and Vision. i-Perception. 2010;1(1):7–27. doi:10.1068/i0382
42.
Thorpe S, Fize D, Marlot C. Speed of Processing in the Human Visual System. Nature. 1996;381(6582):520–2. doi:10.1038/381520a0
43.
Walker-Smith GJ, Gale AG, Findlay JM. Eye Movement Strategies Involved in Face Perception. Perception [Internet]. 1977;6(3). Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1068/p060313n
44.
Bruce V, Young A. Understanding Face Recognition. British Journal of Psychology [Internet]. 1986;77. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1986.tb02199.x/abstract
45.
Busigny T, Graf M, Mayer E, Rossion B. Acquired Prosopagnosia as a Face-Specific Disorder: Ruling Out the General Visual Similarity Account. Neuropsychologia. 2010;48(7):2051–67. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.03.026
46.
Calder AJ. The Oxford Handbook of Face Perception. Oxford library of psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011.
47.
Calder AJ, Young AW. Understanding the Recognition of Facial Identity and Facial Expression. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2005;6(8):641–51. doi:10.1038/nrn1724
48.
Haxby JV, Hoffman EA, Gobbini MI. The Distributed Human Neural System for Face Perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2000;4(6):223–33. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01482-0
49.
Hole G, Bourne V. Face Processing: Psychological, Neuropsychological, and Applied Perspectives. 1st ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2010.
50.
Kanwisher N, Yovel G. The Fusiform Face Area: A Cortical Region Specialized for the Perception of Faces. Philosophical Transactions Of The Royal Society Of London Series B, Biological Sciences [Internet]. 2006;361(1476). Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20209804?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
51.
Tsao DY, Livingstone MS. Mechanisms of Face Perception. Annual Review of Neuroscience. 2008;31(1):411–37. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.30.051606.094238
52.
Valentine T, Lewis MB, Hills PJ. Face-Space: A Unifying Concept in Face Recognition Research. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 2016;69(10):1996–2019. doi:10.1080/17470218.2014.990392
53.
Furl N. Face Recognition Algorithms and the Other-Race Effect: Computational Mechanisms for a Developmental Contact Hypothesis. Cognitive Science. 2002;26(6):797–815. doi:10.1016/S0364-0213(02)00084-8
54.
Hole G, Bourne V. Face Processing: Psychological, Neuropsychological, and Applied Perspectives. 1st ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2010.
55.
Kanwisher N, Mcdermott J, Chun MM. The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception [open access]. Journal Of Neuroscience : The Official Journal Of The Society For Neuroscience [Internet]. 1997;17(11). Available from: http://www.jneurosci.org/content/17/11/4302
56.
Kuhl PK, Williams KA. Linguistic Experience Alters Phonetic Perception in Infants by 6 Months of Age. Science [Internet]. 1992;255(5044):606–8. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2876832
57.
Lee K, Byatt G, Rhodes G. Caricature Effects, Distinctiveness, and Identification: Testing the Face-Space Framework. Psychological Science [Internet]. 2000;11(5):379–85. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40063545?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
58.
Light LL, Kayra-Stuart F, Hollander S. Recognition Memory for Typical and Unusual Faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory. 1979;5(3):212–28. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.5.3.212
59.
McNeil JE, Warrington EK. Prosopagnosia: A Face-Specific Disorder. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A. 1993;46(1):1–10. doi:10.1080/14640749308401064
60.
Moscovitch M, Winocur G, Behrmann M. What Is Special about Face Recognition? Nineteen Experiments on a Person with Visual Object Agnosia and Dyslexia but Normal Face Recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 1997;9(5):555–604. doi:10.1162/jocn.1997.9.5.555
61.
Perrett DI, Rolls ET, Caan W. Visual Neurones Responsive to Faces in the Monkey Temporal Cortex. Experimental Brain Research. 1982;47(3). doi:10.1007/BF00239352
62.
Sergent J, Signoret JL. Varieties of Functional Deficits in Prosopagnosia. Cerebral Cortex (New York, NY : 1991) [Internet]. 1992;2(5). Available from: http://cercor.oxfordjournals.org/content/2/5/375
63.
Tanaka JW, Simonyi D. The "Parts and Wholes” of Face Recognition: A Review of the Literature. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 2016;69(10):1876–89. doi:10.1080/17470218.2016.1146780
64.
Thompson P. Margaret Thatcher: A New Illusion. Perception [Internet]. 2009;38(6):483–4. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1068/p090483
65.
Tsao DY, Freiwald WA. A Cortical Region Consisting Entirely of Face-Selective Cells. Science (New York, NY) [Internet]. 2006;311(5761). Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3843515?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
66.
Valentine T, Bruce V. The Effects of Distinctiveness in Recognising and Classifying Faces. Perception [Internet]. 1986;15(5). Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1068/p150525
67.
Valentine T. A Unified Account of the Effects of Distinctiveness, Inversion, and Race in Face Recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A. 1991;43(2):161–204. doi:10.1080/14640749108400966
68.
Young AW, Hellawell D, Hay DC. Configurational Information in Face Perception. Perception [Internet]. 1987;16(6). Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1068/p160747n
69.
Sumner P, Husain M. At the Edge of Consciousness: Automatic Motor Activation and Voluntary Control. The Neuroscientist. 2007;14(5):474–86. doi:10.1177/1073858408314435
70.
Anderson SJ, Yamagishi N, Karavia V. Attentional Processes Link Perception and Action. Proceedings Biological Sciences [Internet]. 2002;269(1497). Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3067896?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
71.
Biran I, Chatterjee A. Alien Hand Syndrome. Archives of Neurology. 2004;61(2).
72.
Della Sala S, Marchetti C, Spinnler H. Right-Sided Anarchic (Alien) Hand: A Longitudinal Study. Neuropsychologia. 1991;29(11):1113–27. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(91)90081-I
73.
Eimer M, Schlaghecken F. Links Between Conscious Awareness and Response Inhibition: Evidence From Masked Priming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 2002;9(3):514–20. doi:10.3758/BF03196307
74.
Eimer M, Schlaghecken F. Effects of Masked Stimuli on Motor Activation: Behavioral and Electrophysiological Evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 1998;24(6):1737–47. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.24.6.1737
75.
Eimer M, Schlaghecken F. Response Facilitation and Inhibition in Subliminal Priming. Biological Psychology. 2003;64(1–2):7–26. doi:10.1016/S0301-0511(03)00100-5
76.
Grèzes J, Tucker M. Objects Automatically Potentiate Action: An fMRI Study of Implicit Processing. European Journal of Neuroscience. 2003;17(12):2735–40. doi:10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02695.x
77.
Hermens F, Sumner P, Walker R. Inhibition of Masked Primes as Revealed by Saccade Curvature. Vision Research. 2010;50(1):46–56. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2009.10.008
78.
Humphreys GW, Riddoch MJ. One More Cup of Coffee for the Road: Object- Action Assemblies, Response Blocking and Response Capture After Frontal Lobe Damage. In: Executive Control and the Frontal Lobe: Current Issues [Internet]. 2000 Reprint. 2000. p. 81–93. Available from: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s002210000403
79.
Karremans JC, Stroebe W, Claus J. Beyond Vicary’s Fantasies: The Impact of Subliminal Priming and Brand Choice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2006;42(6):792–8. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2005.12.002
80.
Mark VW. Alien Hand Syndrome. MedLink Journal [Internet]. 2007. Available from: https://www.jsmf.org/meetings/2008/may/Mark%20VW%202008%20Alien%20hand%20syndrome.pdf
81.
Misirlisoy E, Hermens F. Spatial Primes Produce Dissociated Inhibitory Effects on Saccadic Latencies and Trajectories. Vision Research. 2014;96:1–7. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2013.12.017
82.
Paus T, Kalina M. Medial vs Lateral Frontal Lobe Lesions and Differential Impairment of Central-Gaze Fixation Maintenance in Man. Brain. 1991;114(5):2051–67. doi:10.1093/brain/114.5.2051
83.
Riddoch MJ, Edwards MG. Visual Affordances Direct Action: Neuropsychological Evidence From Manual Interference. Cognitive Neuropsychology. 1998;15(6–8):645–83. doi:10.1080/026432998381041
84.
Sato W, Okada T, Toichi M. Attentional Shift by Gaze Is Triggered Without Awareness. Experimental Brain Research. 2007;183(1):87–94. doi:10.1007/s00221-007-1025-x
85.
Schlaghecken F, Klapp ST, Maylor EA. Either or Neither, but Not Both: Locating the Effects of Masked Primes. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2009;276(1656):515–21. doi:10.1098/rspb.2008.0933
86.
Sumner P, Nachev P. Human Medial Frontal Cortex Mediates Unconscious Inhibition of Voluntary Action. Neuron. 2007;54(5):697–711. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2007.05.016
87.
Sumner P, Husain M. At the Edge of Consciousness: Automatic Motor Activation and Voluntary Control. The Neuroscientist. 2007;14(5):474–86. doi:10.1177/1073858408314435
88.
Tucker M, Ellis R. On the Relations Between Seen Objects and Components of Potential Actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 1998;24(3):830–46. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.24.3.830
89.
Chalmers D. What is a Neural Correlate of Consciousness? [Internet]. 2000. Available from: http://consc.net/papers/ncc2.html
90.
Haynes JD. An Information-Based Approach to Consciousness: Mental State Decoding [Internet]. 2015. Available from: https://open-mind.net/papers/an-information-based-approach-to-consciousness-mental-state-decoding/at_download/paperPDF
91.
Haynes JD. Decoding Visual Consciousness From Human Brain Signals. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2009;13(5):194–202. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2009.02.004
92.
Goldstein EB. Cengage Learning. In: Sensation and Perception. 9th ed. Belmont, Calif: Wadsworth; 2015.
93.
Goldstein EB. Cengage Learning. In: Sensation and Perception [Internet]. 2015. Available from: http://ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781473711167
94.
Zanker JM. Perception as Gateway to the World. In: Sensation, Perception and Action: An Evolutionary Perspective. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2010.
95.
Van Essen DC, Maunsell JHR. Hierarchical Organization and Functional Streams in the Visual Cortex. Trends in Neurosciences. 1983;6:370–5. doi:10.1016/0166-2236(83)90167-4
96.
Haynes JD. Decoding Visual Consciousness From Human Brain Signals. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2009;13(5):194–202. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2009.02.004
97.
Haynes JD. An Information-Based Approach to Consciousness: Mental State Decoding [Internet]. 2015. Available from: https://open-mind.net/papers/an-information-based-approach-to-consciousness-mental-state-decoding/at_download/paperPDF
98.
Crick F, Koch C. Consciousness and Neuroscience. Cerebral Cortex (New York, NY : 1991) [Internet]. 1998;8(2). Available from: http://cercor.oxfordjournals.org/content/8/2/97
99.
Bartels A, Logothetis NK, Moutoussis K. fMRI and Its Interpretations: An Illustration on Directional Selectivity in Area V5/MT. Trends in Neurosciences. 2008;31(9):444–53. doi:10.1016/j.tins.2008.06.004
100.
Leopold DA, Logothetis NK. Multistable Phenomena: Changing Views in Perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 1999;3(7):254–64. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01332-7
101.
Buhusi CV, Meck WH. What Makes Us Tick? Functional and Neural Mechanisms of Interval Timing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2005;6(10):755–65. doi:10.1038/nrn1764
102.
Grondin S. Timing and Time Perception: A Review of Recent Behavioral and Neuroscience Findings and Theoretical Directions. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics. 2010;72(3):561–82. doi:10.3758/APP.72.3.561
103.
Johnston A, Arnold DH, Nishida S. Spatially Localized Distortions of Event Time. Current Biology. 2006;16(5):472–9. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2006.01.032
104.
Tse PU, Intriligator J, Rivest J, Cavanagh P. Attention and the Subjective Expansion of Time. Perception & Psychophysics. 2004;66(7):1171–89. doi:10.3758/BF03196844
105.
Kosslyn SM, Ganis G, Thompson WL. Neural Foundations of Imagery. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2001;2(9):635–42. doi:10.1038/35090055
106.
Pylyshyn Z. Return of the Mental Image: Are There Really Pictures in the Brain? Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2003;7(3):113–8. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00003-2
107.
Pearson J, Kosslyn SM. The Heterogeneity of Mental Representation: Ending the Imagery Debate. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2015;112(33):10089–92. doi:10.1073/pnas.1504933112
108.
Cisek P, Kalaska JF. Neural Correlates of Mental Rehearsal in Dorsal Premotor Cortex. Nature. 2004;431(7011):993–6. doi:10.1038/nature03005
109.
Cohen MS, Brookheimer SM, Breiter GJ. Changes in Cortical Activity During Mental Rotation: A Mapping Study Using Functional MRI. Brain [Internet]. 1996;119(1):89–100. Available from: http://brain.oxfordjournals.org/content/119/1/89
110.
Ester EF, Serences JT, Awh E. Spatially Global Representations in Human Primary Visual Cortex during Working Memory Maintenance. Journal of Neuroscience. 2009;29(48):15258–65. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4388-09.2009
111.
Finke RA, Kurtzman HS. Mapping the Visual Field in Mental Imagery. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 1981;110(4):501–17. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.110.4.501
112.
Hubbard TL. Auditory Imagery: Empirical Findings. Psychological Bulletin. 2010;136(2):302–29. doi:10.1037/a0018436
113.
Ishai A, Sagi D. Common Mechanisms of Visual Imagery and Perception. Science [Internet]. 1995;268(5218):1772–4. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2887815?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
114.
Jeannerod M, Decety J. Mental Motor Imagery: A Window Into the Representational Stages of Action. Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 1995;5(6):727–32. doi:10.1016/0959-4388(95)80099-9
115.
Kosslyn SM. Image and Brain: The Resolution of the Imagery Debate. Cambridge, Mass: MIT; 1994.
116.
Kosslyn SM, Ganis G, Thompson WL. Neural Foundations of Imagery. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2001;2(9):635–42. doi:10.1038/35090055
117.
Kosslyn SM, Thompson WL, Klm IJ, Alpert NM. Topographical Representations of Mental Images in Primary Visual Cortex. Nature. 1995;378(6556):496–8. doi:10.1038/378496a0
118.
Kosslyn SM, Behrmann M, Jeannerod M. The Cognitive Neuroscience of Mental Imagery. Neuropsychologia. 1995;33(11):1335–44. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(95)00067-D
119.
Kosslyn SM. The Role of Area 17 in Visual Imagery: Convergent Evidence from PET and rTMS. Science. 1999;284(5411):167–70. doi:10.1126/science.284.5411.167
120.
Kosslyn SM, Thompson WL. When Is Early Visual Cortex Activated During Visual Mental Imagery? Psychological Bulletin. 2003;129(5):723–46. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.5.723
121.
Linden DEJ, Thornton K, Kuswanto CN, Johnston SJ, van de Ven V, Jackson MC. The Brain’s Voices: Comparing Nonclinical Auditory Hallucinations and Imagery. Cerebral Cortex. 2011;21(2):330–7. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhq097
122.
Parsons LM. Imagined Spatial Transformations of One’s Hands and Feet. Cognitive Psychology. 1987;19(2):178–241. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(87)90011-9
123.
Pearson J, Kosslyn SM. The Heterogeneity of Mental Representation: Ending the Imagery Debate. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2015;112(33):10089–92. doi:10.1073/pnas.1504933112
124.
Perky CW. An Experimental Study of Imagination. The American Journal of Psychology. 1910;21(3):422–52. doi:10.2307/1413350
125.
Pylyshyn Z. Return of the Mental Image: Are There Really Pictures in the Brain? Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2003;7(3):113–8. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00003-2
126.
Rich AN, Williams MA, Puce A, Syngeniotis A, Howard MA, McGlone F, et al. Neural Correlates of Imagined and Synaesthetic Colours. Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(14):2918–25. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.06.024
127.
Shepard RN, Metzler J. Mental Rotation of Three-Dimensional Objects. Science [Internet]. 1971;171(3972):701–3. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1731476?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
128.
Thompson P. Margaret Thatcher: A New Illusion. Perception [Internet]. 2009;38(6):483–4. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1068/p090483
129.
Tootell RBH, Hadjikhani N, Hall EK, Marrett S, Vanduffel W, Vaughan JT, et al. The Retinotopy of Visual Spatial Attention. Neuron. 1998;21(6):1409–22. doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80659-5
130.
Silverman MS, Switkes E, De Valois RL. Deoxyglucose Analysis of Retinotopic Organization in Primate Striate Cortex. Science [Internet]. 1982;218(4575):902–4. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1689041?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
131.
Rensink RA. Change Detection. Annual Review of Psychology. 2002;53(1):245–77. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135125
132.
Simons DJ, Rensink RA. Change Blindness: Past, Present, and Future. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2005;9(1):16–20. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.11.006
133.
Beck DM. Right Parietal Cortex Plays a Critical Role in Change Blindness. Cerebral Cortex. 2005;16(5):712–7. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhj017
134.
Beck DM, Rees G, Frith CD, Lavie N. Neural Correlates of Change Detection and Change Blindness. Nature Neuroscience. 2001;4(6):645–50. doi:10.1038/88477
135.
Cherry EC. Some Experiments on the Recognition of Speech, With One and With Two Ears. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 1953;25(5):975–9. doi:10.1121/1.1907229
136.
Eramudugolla R, Irvine DRF, McAnally KI, Martin RL, Mattingley JB. Directed Attention Eliminates ‘Change Deafness’ in Complex Auditory Scenes. Current Biology. 2005;15(12):1108–13. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2005.05.051
137.
McConkie GW, Currie CB. Visual Stability Across Saccades While Viewing Complex Pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 1996;22(3):563–81. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.22.3.563
138.
Henderson JM, Hollingworth A. High-Level Scene Perception. Annual Review of Psychology. 1999;50(1):243–71. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.243
139.
O’Regan JK. ‘Mud Splashes’ Render Picture Changes Invisible [open access]. Invest Opthamol Vis Sci. 37(3).
140.
Rensink RA. Change Detection. Annual Review of Psychology. 2002;53(1):245–77. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135125
141.
Rensink RA, O’Regan JK, Clark JJ. To See or Not to See: The Need for Attention to Perceive Changes in Scenes. Psychological Science [Internet]. 1997;8(5):368–73. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40063214?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
142.
Simons DJ, Ambinder MS. Change Blindness: Theory and Consequences. Current Directions in Psychological Science [Internet]. 2005;14(1):44–8. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20182983?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
143.
Vitevitch MS. Change Deafness: The Inability to Detect Changes Between Two Voices. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 2003;29(2):333–42. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.29.2.333
144.
Howard RJ. The Functional Anatomy of Imagining and Perceiving Colour [open access]. NeuroReport. 1998;9(6):1019–23.
145.
Adair JC, Schwartz RL, Na DL, Fennell E, Gilmore RL, Heilman KM. Anosognosia: Examining the Disconnection Hypothesis. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 1997;63(6):798–800. doi:10.1136/jnnp.63.6.798
146.
Berti A, Spinazzola L, Pia L, Rabuffetti M, Haggard P, Rossetti Y, et al. Motor Awareness and Motor Intention in Anosognosia for Hemiplegia. In: Sensorimotor Foundations of Higher Cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008. p. 163–81.
147.
Berti A, Bottini G, Gandola M, Pia L, Smania N, Stracciari A, et al. Shared Cortical Anatomy for Motor Awareness and Motor Control. Science [Internet]. 2005;309(5733):488–91. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3842242
148.
Bisiach E, Vallar G, Perani D, Papagno C, Berti A. Unawareness of Disease Following Lesions of the Right Hemisphere: Anosognosia for Hemiplegia and Anosognosia for Hemianopia. Neuropsychologia. 1986;24(4):471–82. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(86)90092-8
149.
Cappa S, Sterzi R, Vallar G, Bisiach E. Remission of Hemineglect and Anosognosia During Vestibular Stimulation. Neuropsychologia. 1987;25(5):775–82. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(87)90115-1
150.
Carpenter K, Berti A, Oxbury S, Molyneux AJ, Bisiach E, Oxbury JM. Awareness of and Memory for Arm Weakness During Intracarotid Sodium Amytal Testing. Brain. 1995;118(1):243–51. doi:10.1093/brain/118.1.243
151.
Cocchini G, Beschin N, Sala SD. Chronic Anosognosia: A Case Report and Theoretical Account. Neuropsychologia. 2002;40(12):2030–8. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00054-4
152.
Cutting J. Study of Anosognosia. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 1978;41(6):548–55. doi:10.1136/jnnp.41.6.548
153.
Davies M, Davies AA, Coltheart M. Anosognosia and the Two-Factor Theory of Delusions. Mind and Language. 2005;20(2):209–36. doi:10.1111/j.0268-1064.2005.00283.x
154.
Fasold O, von Brevern M, Kuhberg M, Ploner CJ, Villringer A, Lempert T, et al. Human Vestibular Cortex as Identified With Caloric Stimulation in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging. NeuroImage. 2002;17(3):1384–93. doi:10.1006/nimg.2002.1241
155.
Fotopoulou A, Pernigo S, Maeda R, Rudd A, Kopelman MA. Implicit Awareness in Anosognosia for Hemiplegia: Unconscious Interference Without Conscious Re-Representation. Brain. 2010;133(12):3564–77. doi:10.1093/brain/awq233
156.
Fotopoulou A, Rudd A, Holmes P, Kopelman M. Self-Observation Reinstates Motor Awareness in Anosognosia for Hemiplegia. Neuropsychologia. 2009;47(5):1256–60. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.01.018
157.
Frith CD, Blakemore SJ, Wolpert DM. Abnormalities in the Awareness and Control of Action. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences. 2000;355(1404):1771–88. doi:10.1098/rstb.2000.0734
158.
Garbarini F, Rabuffetti M, Piedimonte A, Pia L, Ferrarin M, Frassinetti F, et al. ‘Moving’ a Paralysed Hand: Bimanual Coupling Effect in Patients With Anosognosia for Hemiplegia. Brain. 2012;135(5):1486–97. doi:10.1093/brain/aws015
159.
Gold M, Adair JC, Jacobs DH, Heilman KM. Anosognosia for Hemiplegia: An Electrophysiologic Investigation of the Feed-Forward Hypothesis. Neurology. 1994;44(10):1804–1804. doi:10.1212/WNL.44.10.1804
160.
Heilman KM. Possible Mechanisms of Anosognosia of Hemiplegia. Cortex. 2014;61:30–42. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2014.06.007
161.
Heilman KM, Barrett AM, Adair JC. Possible Mechanisms of Anosognosia: A Defect in Self–awareness. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences. 1998;353(1377):1903–9. doi:10.1098/rstb.1998.0342
162.
Karnath HO. Awareness of the Functioning of One’s Own Limbs Mediated by the Insular Cortex? Journal of Neuroscience. 2005;25(31):7134–8. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1590-05.2005
163.
Levine DN. Unawareness of Visual and Sensorimotor Defects: A Hypothesis. Brain and Cognition. 1990;13(2):233–81. doi:10.1016/0278-2626(90)90052-P
164.
Lu LH, Barrett AM, Schwartz RL, Cibula JE, Gilmore RL, Uthman BM, et al. Anosognosia and Confabulation During the Wada Test. Neurology. 1997;49(5):1316–22. doi:10.1212/WNL.49.5.1316
165.
Lu HL, Barrett MA, Cibula EJ, Gilmore LR, Heilman MK. Proprioception More Impaired Distally Than Proximally in Subjects With Hemispheric Dysfunction. Neurology [Internet]. 2000;55(4):596–7. Available from: https://librarysearch.royalholloway.ac.uk/permalink/f/4u704i/TN_ovid00006114-200008220-00034
166.
Marcel AJ. Slippage in the Unity of Consciousness. In: Experimental and Theoretical Studies of Consciousness. Chichester: Wiley; 1993.
167.
Marcel AJ. Slippage in the Unity of Consciousness. In: Experimental and Theoretical Studies of Consciousness [Internet]. Chichester: Wiley; 1993. p. 168–86. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/9780470514412.ch9 doi:10.1002/9780470514412.ch9
168.
Marcel A, Tegner R, Nimmosmith I. Anosognosia for Plegia: Specificity, Extension, Partiality and Disunity of Bodily Unawareness. Cortex. 2004;40(1):19–40. doi:10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70919-5
169.
McKay R, Tamagni C, Palla A, Krummenacher P, Hegemann SCA, Straumann D, et al. Vestibular Stimulation Attenuates Unrealistic Optimism. Cortex. 2013;49(8):2272–5. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2013.04.005
170.
Nathanson M. Denial of Illness: Its Occurrence in One Hundred Cases of Hemiplegia. AMA Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry. 1952;68(3):380–7. doi:10.1001/archneurpsyc.1952.02320210090010
171.
Nardone IB, Ward R, Fotopoulou A, Turnbull OH. Attention and Emotion in Anosognosia: Evidence of Implicit Awareness and Repression? Neurocase. 2008;13(5–6):438–45. doi:10.1080/13554790701881749
172.
Pia L, Neppi-Modona M, Ricci R, Berti A. The Anatomy of Anosognosia for Hemiplegia: A Meta-Analysis. Cortex. 2004;40(2):367–77. doi:10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70131-X
173.
Orfei MD, Robinson RG, Prigatano GP, Starkstein S, Rusch N, Bria P, et al. Anosognosia for Hemiplegia After Stroke Is a Multifaceted Phenomenon: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Brain. 2007;130(12):3075–90. doi:10.1093/brain/awm106
174.
Pia L, Neppi-Modona M, Ricci R, Berti A. The Anatomy of Anosognosia for Hemiplegia: A Meta-Analysis. Cortex. 2004;40(2):367–77. doi:10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70131-X
175.
Ramachandran VS. Anosognosia in Parietal Lobe Syndrome. Consciousness and Cognition. 1995;4(1):22–51. doi:10.1006/ccog.1995.1002
176.
Sharot T, Korn CW, Dolan RJ. How Unrealistic Optimism Is Maintained in the Face of Reality. Nature Neuroscience. 2011;14(11):1475–9. doi:10.1038/nn.2949
177.
Small M, Ellis S. Denial of Hemiplegia: An Investigation Into the Theories of Causation. European Neurology. 1996;36(6):353–63. doi:10.1159/000117293
178.
Turnbull OH, Fotopoulou A, Solms M. Anosognosia as Motivated Unawareness: The ‘Defence’ Hypothesis Revisited. Cortex. 2014;61:18–29. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2014.10.008
179.
Vuilleumier P. Anosognosia: The Neurology of Beliefs and Uncertainties. Cortex. 2004;40(1):9–17. doi:10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70918-3
180.
Weinstein EA. Anosognosia and Denial of Illness. In: Awareness of Deficit After Brain Injury. New York: Oxford University Press; 1991. p. 240–57.
181.
Weinstein EA, Kahn RL. Denial of Illness: Symbolic and Physiological Aspects. Springfield, Ill: Thomas; 1955.
182.
Bradshaw JL, Mattingley JB. Clinical Neuropsychology: Behavioral and Brain Science. San Diego: Academic Press; 1995.
183.
Bradshaw JL, Mattingley JB. Clinical Neuropsychology: Behavioral and Brain Science [Electronic resource]. San Diego: Academic Press; 1995. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=1874364
184.
Milner AD, Goodale MA. The Visual Brain in Action. 2nd Edition. Vol. 43. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006.
185.
Milner AD, Goodale MA. The Visual Brain in Action [Internet]. 2nd Edition. Vol. 27. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Incorporated; 2006. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=5121591
186.
Robertson IH, Marshall JC. Unilateral Neglect: Clinical and Experimental Studies. Hove: Erlbaum; 1993.
187.
Berti A, Rizzolatti G. Visual Processing Without Awareness: Evidence From Unilateral Neglect. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 1992;4(4):345–51. doi:10.1162/jocn.1992.4.4.345
188.
Cappa S, Sterzi R, Vallar G, Bisiach E. Remission of Hemineglect and Anosognosia During Vestibular Stimulation. Neuropsychologia. 1987;25(5):775–82. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(87)90115-1
189.
de Haan B, Karnath HO, Driver J. Mechanisms and Anatomy of Unilateral Extinction After Brain Injury. Neuropsychologia. 2012;50(6):1045–53. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.02.015
190.
Dennett Daniel C. Filling in Versus Finding Out: A Ubiquitous Confusion in Cognitive Science. In: Cognition, Conception, and Methodological Issues [Internet]. American Psychological Association; 1992. Available from: http://cogprints.org/267/1/fillin.htm
191.
Churchland PS, Ramachandran VS. Filling In: Why Dennett Is Wrong. In: Perception [Internet]. New York: Oxford University Press; 1993. p. 132–57. Available from: http://ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780195359169
192.
Duncan J, Humphreys G, Ward R. Competitive Brain Activity in Visual Attention. Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 1997;7(2):255–61. doi:10.1016/S0959-4388(97)80014-1
193.
Fasold O, von Brevern M, Kuhberg M, Ploner CJ, Villringer A, Lempert T, et al. Human Vestibular Cortex as Identified With Caloric Stimulation in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging. NeuroImage. 2002;17(3):1384–93. doi:10.1006/nimg.2002.1241
194.
Husain M, Nachev P. Space and the Parietal Cortex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2007;11(1):30–6. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.10.011
195.
Marshall JC, Halligan PW. Blindsight and Insight in Visuo-Spatial Neglect. Nature. 1988;336(6201):766–7. doi:10.1038/336766a0
196.
Mattingley JB, Driver J, Beschin N, Robertson IH. Attentional Competition Between Modalities: Extinction Between Touch and Vision After Right Hemisphere Damage. Neuropsychologia. 1997;35(6):867–80. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(97)00008-0
197.
Rizzolatti G, Berti A. Neural Mechanisms of Spatial Neglect. In: Unilateral Neglect [Internet]. L.Erlbaum; 2013. p. 87–106. Available from: http://ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780203765258
198.
Robertson IH, Heutink J. Rehabilitation of Unilateral Neglect. In: Neuropsychological Rehabilitation: A Cognitive Approach. Amsterdam: Boom; 2002.
199.
Rode G, Charles N, Perenin MT, Vighetto A, Trillet M, Aimard G. Partial Remission of Hemiplegia and Somatoparaphrenia Through Vestibular Stimulation in a Case of Unilateral Neglect. Cortex. 1992;28(2):203–8. doi:10.1016/S0010-9452(13)80048-2
200.
Singh-Curry V, Husain M. Rehabilitation of Neglect. In: Cognitive Neurorehabilitation: Evidence and Application. 2nd Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010. p. 449–63.
201.
Torjussen T. Visual Processing in Cortically Blind Hemifields. Neuropsychologia. 1978;16(1):15–21. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(78)90038-6
202.
Vallar G. Spatial Hemineglect in Humans. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 1998;2(3):87–97. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(98)01145-0
203.
Vallar G, Bottini G, Rusconi ML, Sterzi R. Exploring Somatosensory Hemineglect by Vestibular Stimulation. Brain. 1993;116(1):71–86. doi:10.1093/brain/116.1.71
204.
Vallar G, Sterzi R, Bottini G, Cappa S, Rusconi ML. Temporary Remission of Left Hemianesthesia After Vestibular Stimulation. a Sensory Neglect Phenomenon. Cortex. 1990;26(1):123–31. doi:10.1016/S0010-9452(13)80078-0
205.
Vallar G, Rusconi ML, Bignamini L, Geminiani G, Perani D. Anatomical Correlates of Visual and Tactile Extinction in Humans: A Clinical Ct Scan Study. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 1994;57(4):464–70. doi:10.1136/jnnp.57.4.464
206.
Vallar G. Spatial Hemineglect in Humans. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 1998;2(3):87–97. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(98)01145-0
207.
Volpe BT, Ledoux JE, Gazzaniga MS. Information Processing of Visual Stimuli in an ‘Extinguished’ Field. Nature. 1979;282(5740):722–4. doi:10.1038/282722a0
208.
Walker R, Mattingley JB. Ghosts in the Machine? Pathological Visual Completion Phenomena in the Damaged Brain. Neurocase. 1997;3(5):313–35. doi:10.1080/13554799708411972
209.
Walker R, Young AW. Object-Based Neglect: An Investigation of the Contributions of Eye Movements and Perceptual Completion. Cortex. 1996;32(2):279–95. doi:10.1016/S0010-9452(96)80051-7
210.
Weil RS, Plant GT, James-Galton M, Rees G. Neural Correlates of Hemianopic Completion Across the Vertical Meridian. Neuropsychologia. 2009;47(2):457–64. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.09.020
211.
Young AW, Hellawell DJ, Welch J. Neglect and Visual Recognition. Brain. 1992;115(1):51–71. doi:10.1093/brain/115.1.51
212.
Williams B. The Self and the Future. The Philosophical Review. 1970;79(2):161–80. doi:10.2307/2183946
213.
Goldstein RN. Extract - Identity Crisis. In: Betraying Spinoza: The Renegade Jew Who Gave Us Modernity [Internet]. New York: Nextbook/Shocken; 2006. p. 124–5. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/EReader/Index?p=RDpcU2l0ZXNccHJvZHVjdGlvblxEb2NzXDIxMzM3N1xEQ1MtNTY0OTlmOWQtMWQ2YS00MDEwLTkxYjktYzZiY2MzYmRkMmJkLnBkZg==&o=JnB1Ymxpc2hlZENvbnRlbnRfSWQ9NzA2ODQ3JmNvbnRlbnRSZXF1ZXN0X0lkPTc3OTE0MyZkb2N1bWVudExpbms9YzBjYmI5OWUtZjg1OC1lODExLTgwY2QtMDA1MDU2YWY0MDk5JmNvbnRlbnRJdGVtX0lkPTIxMzM3Nw==&id=c0cbb99e-f858-e811-80cd-005056af4099
214.
Broks P. To be Two or Not to Be. In: Into the Silent Land [Internet]. London: Atlantic Books; 2003. p. 204–25. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/EReader/Index?p=RDpcU2l0ZXNccHJvZHVjdGlvblxUZW1wXERDUy0wZmFmMmZiOC0yN2M1LTQzYWMtOGE3Yy0wNzdkNjczNmY4MTcucGRm&o=JnB1Ymxpc2hlZENvbnRlbnRfSWQ9NzA2ODQ1JmNvbnRlbnRSZXF1ZXN0X0lkPTc3OTE0MSZkb2N1bWVudExpbms9MTQ4NzVlOTgtZjg1OC1lODExLTgwY2QtMDA1MDU2YWY0MDk5JmNvbnRlbnRJdGVtX0lkPTIwNzcwNA==&id=14875e98-f858-e811-80cd-005056af4099
215.
Hofstadter D. Prelude… Ant Fugue. In: Gödel, Escher, Bach : An Eternal Golden Braid [Internet]. Basic Books; 1945. p. 275–336. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/EReader/Index?p=RDpcU2l0ZXNccHJvZHVjdGlvblxUZW1wXERDUy0yZGUzMDA0Mi1lY2Q4LTQxMzMtOGRmNi1hNTc3NmQ3OTI4OTQucGRm&o=JnB1Ymxpc2hlZENvbnRlbnRfSWQ9OTM0NjMwJmNvbnRlbnRSZXF1ZXN0X0lkPTEwMTA0ODMmZG9jdW1lbnRMaW5rPTk1MThkOGQzLTMwY2UtZTkxMS04MGNkLTAwNTA1NmFmNDA5OSZjb250ZW50SXRlbV9JZD0yNzE2MDY=&id=9518d8d3-30ce-e911-80cd-005056af4099
216.
Dennet D. Where am I. In: The Mind’s I [Internet]. Harmondsworth: Penguin; 1982. p. 217–31. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/EReader/Index?p=RDpcU2l0ZXNccHJvZHVjdGlvblxUZW1wXERDUy1kNWU3ZmEwNi1hN2M5LTRjMzgtOTYyMC0wMjdhZWY1ZjZlMjMucGRm&o=JnB1Ymxpc2hlZENvbnRlbnRfSWQ9NzA2ODQ2JmNvbnRlbnRSZXF1ZXN0X0lkPTc3OTE0MiZkb2N1bWVudExpbms9MTU4NzVlOTgtZjg1OC1lODExLTgwY2QtMDA1MDU2YWY0MDk5JmNvbnRlbnRJdGVtX0lkPTIwNzcwNQ==&id=15875e98-f858-e811-80cd-005056af4099
217.
von Hippel W, Trivers R. The Evolution and Psychology of Self-Deception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2011;34(1):1–16. doi:10.1017/S0140525X10001354
218.
Lamba S, Nityananda V. Self-Deceived Individuals Are Better at Deceiving Others. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(8). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0104562
219.
Van Leeuwen DSN. The Spandrels of Self-Deception: Prospects for a Biological Theory of a Mental Phenomenon. Philosophical Psychology. 2007;20(3):329–48. doi:10.1080/09515080701197148
220.
Mele AR. Real self-deception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 1997;20(1):91–102. doi:10.1017/S0140525X97000034
221.
Kurzban R. Why Everyone (Else) Is a Hypocrite: Evolution and the Modular Mind. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press; 2012.
222.
Kurzban R. Why Everyone (Else) Is a Hypocrite: Evolution and the Modular Mind [Electronic book]. 2010. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=664599
223.
Johansson P, Hall L, Sikström S, Olsson A. Failure to Detect Mismatches Between Intention and Outcome in a Simple Decision Task. Science [Internet]. 2005;310(5745):116–9. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3842875
224.
McKay R. Isn’t it ironic? A review of ‘Why Everyone (Else) is a Hypocrite: Evolution and the Modular Mind’. Evolution and Human Behavior. 2011;32(6):444–6. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2011.04.005
225.
Tappin BM, van der Leer L, McKay RT. The Heart Trumps the Head: Desirability Bias in Political Belief Revision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 2017;146(8):1143–9. doi:10.1037/xge0000298
226.
van der Leer L, McKay R. The Optimist Within? Selective Sampling and Self-Deception. Consciousness and Cognition. 2017;50:23–9. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2016.07.005
227.
Nir Y, Tononi G. Dreaming and the brain: from phenomenology to neurophysiology. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2010 Feb;14(2):88–100. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2009.12.001
228.
Dresler M, Wehrle R, Spoormaker VI, Koch SP, Holsboer F, Steiger A, et al. Neural Correlates of Dream Lucidity Obtained from Contrasting Lucid versus Non-Lucid REM Sleep: A Combined EEG/fMRI Case Study. Sleep. 2012 Jul;35(7):1017–20. doi:10.5665/sleep.1974
229.
Southwick SM, Davis M, Horner B, Cahill L, Morgan CA, Gold PE, et al. Relationship of Enhanced Norepinephrine Activity During Memory Consolidation to Enhanced Long-Term Memory in Humans. American Journal of Psychiatry. 2002 Aug;159(8):1420–2. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.159.8.1420
230.
Stickgold R. Replaying the Game: Hypnagogic Images in Normals and Amnesics. Science. 2000 Oct 13;290(5490):350–3. doi:10.1126/science.290.5490.350
231.
Siclari F, Baird B, Perogamvros L, Bernardi G, LaRocque JJ, Riedner B, et al. The neural correlates of dreaming. Nature Neuroscience. 2017 Jun;20(6):872–8. doi:10.1038/nn.4545
232.
Hobson JA, Pace-Schott EF, Stickgold R. Dreaming and the brain: Toward a cognitive neuroscience of conscious states. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2000 Dec;23(6):793–842. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00003976
233.
Hobson JA. REM sleep and dreaming: towards a theory of protoconsciousness. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2009 Nov;10(11):803–13. doi:10.1038/nrn2716
234.
Solms M. Dreaming and REM sleep are controlled by different brain mechanisms. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2000 Dec;23(6):843–50. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00003988
235.
Mark Solms. Freud Returns. Scientific American [Internet]. 2004;290(5). Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/26047718?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
236.
Freudian dream theory today | The Psychologist [Internet]. Available from: https://thepsychologist.bps.org.uk/volume-13/edition-12/freudian-dream-theory-today-0
237.
Revonsuo A. The reinterpretation of dreams: An evolutionary hypothesis of the function of dreaming. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2000 Dec;23(6):877–901. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00004015
238.
KATJA VALLI and ANTTI REVONSUO. The threat simulation theory in light of recent empirical evidence: A review. The American Journal of Psychology [Internet]. 2009;122(1). Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/27784372?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
239.
Valli K, Strandholm T, Sillanmäki L, Revonsuo A. Dreams are more negative than real life: Implications for the function of dreaming. Cognition & Emotion. 2008 Aug;22(5):833–61. doi:10.1080/02699930701541591
240.
Valli K, Revonsuo A, Pälkäs O, Ismail KH, Ali KJ, Punamäki RL. The threat simulation theory of the evolutionary function of dreaming: Evidence from dreams of traumatized children. Consciousness and Cognition. 2005 Mar;14(1):188–218. doi:10.1016/S1053-8100(03)00019-9
241.
Revonsuo, Antti. The Avatars in the Machine: Dreaming as a Simulation of Social Reality [Internet]. doi:10.15502/9783958570375
