Bibliography for PS3060: Consciousness and Cognition BETA

1.

Dennett, D.: The Illusion of Consciousness, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fjbWr3ODbAo, (2007).

2.

Bradshaw, J.L., Mattingley, J.B.: Clinical Neuropsychology: Behavioral and Brain Science. In: Clinical Neuropsychology: Behavioral and Brain Science. Academic Press, San Diego (1995).

3.

Dennett, D.: Consciousness: More like Fame than Television, http://pp.kpnet.fi/seirioa/cdenn/concfame.htm.

4.

Berti, A., Bottini, G.: Shared Cortical Anatomy for Motor Awareness and Motor Control. Science. 309, 488–491 (2005).

5.

Dennett, D.C.: Consciousness Explained. Allen Lane, London (1991).

6.

Dennett, D.: Filling in Versus Finding Out: A Ubiquitous Confusion in Cognitive Science. In: Cognition: conceptual and methodological issues. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC (1992).

7.

Churchland, P.S., Ramachandran, V.S.: Filling In: Why Dennett Is Wrong. In: Perception. Oxford University Press, New York (1996).

8.

Churchland, P.S., Ramachandran, V.S.: Filling In: Why Dennett Is Wrong. In: Perception. Oxford University Press, New York (1996).

9.

Halligan, P.W.: Completion in Visuo-Spatial Neglect: A Case Study. Neurocase. 3, 395–403 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1093/neucas/3.5.395-j.

10.

McKay, R., Tamagni, C., Palla, A., Krummenacher, P., Hegemann, S.C.A., Straumann, D., Brugger, P.: Vestibular Stimulation Attenuates Unrealistic Optimism. Cortex. 49, 2272–2275 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2013.04.005.

11.

Ramachandran, V.S.: Anosognosia in Parietal Lobe Syndrome. Consciousness and Cognition. 4, 22–51 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1006/ccog.1995.1002.

12.

Rode, G., Charles, N., Perenin, M.T., Vighetto, A., Trillet, M., Aimard, G.: Partial Remission of Hemiplegia and Somatoparaphrenia Through Vestibular Stimulation in a Case of Unilateral Neglect. Cortex. 28, 203–208 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(13)80048-2.

13.

Walker, R., Mattingley, J.B.: Ghosts in the Machine? Pathological Visual Completion Phenomena in the Damaged Brain. Neurocase. 3, 313–335 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1080/13554799708411972.

14.

Walker, R., Young, A.W.: Object-Based Neglect: An Investigation of the Contributions of Eye Movements and Perceptual Completion. Cortex. 32, 279–295 (1996).

15.

Weil, R.S., Plant, G.T., James-Galton, M., Rees, G.: Neural Correlates of Hemianopic Completion Across the Vertical Meridian. Neuropsychologia. 47, 457–464 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.09.020.

16.

Young, A.W., Hellawell, D.J., Welch, J.: Neglect and Visual Recognition. Brain. 115, 51–71 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/115.1.51.

17.

Kingstone, A.: Taking a Real Look at Social Attention. Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 19, 52–56 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2009.05.004.

18.

Langton, S.R.H., Watt, R.J., Bruce, V.: Do the Eyes Have It? Cues to the Direction of Social Attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 4, 50–59 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01436-9.

19.

Nummenmaa, L., Calder, A.J.: Neural Mechanisms of Social Attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 13, 135–143 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.12.006.

20.

Calder, A.J., Beaver, J.D., Winston, J.S., Dolan, R.J., Jenkins, R., Eger, E., Henson, R.N.A.: Separate Coding of Different Gaze Directions in the Superior Temporal Sulcus and Inferior Parietal Lobule. Current Biology. 17, 20–25 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2006.10.052.

21.

Driver, J., Davis, G., Ricciardelli, P., Kidd, P., Maxwell, E., Baron-Cohen, S.: Gaze Perception Triggers Reflexive Visuospatial Orienting. Visual Cognition. 6, 509–540 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1080/135062899394920.

22.

Eriksen, C.W., St. James, J.D.: Visual Attention Within and Around the Field of Focal Attention: A Zoom Lens Model. Perception & Psychophysics. 40, 225–240 (1986). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211502.

23.

Findlay, J.M., Gilchrist, I.D.: Active Vision: The Psychology of Looking and Seeing. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2003).

24.

Friesen, C.K., Kingstone, A.: The Eyes Have It! Reflexive Orienting Is Triggered by Nonpredictive Gaze. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 5, 490–495 (1998). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208827.

25.

Freisen, C.K., Kingstone, A.: Inhibition of Return and Reflexive Attention to Gaze Direction [open access]. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. (1999).

26.

Henderson, J.M.: Visual Attention and Eye Movement Control During Reading  and Picture Viewing. In: Eye Movements and Visual Cognition: Scene Perception and Reading. Springer, New York, NY (1992).

27.

Jenkins, R., Beaver, J.D.: I Thought You Were Looking at Me: Direction-Specific Aftereffects in Gaze Perception. Psychological Science. 17, 506–513 (2006).

28.

Findlay, J.M., Gilchrist, I.D.: Active Vision: The Psychology of Looking and Seeing. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2003).

29.

Biederman, I.: Perceiving Real-World Scenes. Science. 177, 77–80 (1972).

30.

Fei-Fei, A., Iyer, C., Pietro, P.: What Do We Perceive in a Glance of a Real-World Scene?[open access]. Journal of Vision. 7, (2007).

31.

Henderson, J.: Human Gaze Control During Real-World Scene Perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 7, 498–504 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2003.09.006.

32.

Henderson, J.M., Weeks, P.A., Hollingworth, A.: The Effects of Semantic Consistency on Eye Movements During Complex Scene Viewing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 25, 210–228 (1999).

33.

Henderson, J.M., Hollingworth, A.: High-Level Scene Perception. Annual Review of Psychology. 50, 243–271 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.243.

34.

Itti, L., Koch, C.: A Saliency-Based Search Mechanism for Overt and Covert Shifts of Visual Attention. Vision Research. 40, 1489–1506 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989(99)00163-7.

35.

Itti, L., Koch, C.: Computational Modelling of Visual Attention. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2, 194–203 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/35058500.

36.

Loftus, G.R., Mackworth, N.H.: Cognitive Determinants of Fixation Location During Picture Viewing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 4, 565–572 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.4.4.565.

37.

Parkhurst, D., Law, K., Niebur, E.: Modeling the Role of Salience in the Allocation of Overt Visual Attention. Vision Research. 42, 107–123 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00250-4.

38.

Righart, R., De Gelder, B.: Recognition of Facial Expressions Is Influenced by Emotional Scene Gist. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience. 8, 264–272 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.8.3.264.

39.

Rousselet, G., Joubert, O., Fabre-Thorpe, M.: How Long to Get to the "Gist” of Real-World Natural Scenes? Visual Cognition. 12, 852–877 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1080/13506280444000553.

40.

Tatler, B.W., Baddeley, R.J., Gilchrist, I.D.: Visual Correlates of Fixation Selection: Effects of Scale and Time. Vision Research. 45, 643–659 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2004.09.017.

41.

Tatler, B.W., Wade, N.J.: Yarbus, Eye Movements, and Vision. i-Perception. 1, 7–27 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1068/i0382.

42.

Thorpe, S., Fize, D., Marlot, C.: Speed of Processing in the Human Visual System. Nature. 381, 520–522 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1038/381520a0.

43.

Walker-Smith, G.J., Gale, A.G., Findlay, J.M.: Eye Movement Strategies Involved in Face Perception. Perception. 6, (1977).

44.

Bruce, V., Young, A.: Understanding Face Recognition. British Journal of Psychology. 77, (1986).

45.

Busigny, T., Graf, M., Mayer, E., Rossion, B.: Acquired Prosopagnosia as a Face-Specific Disorder: Ruling Out the General Visual Similarity Account. Neuropsychologia. 48, 2051–2067 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.03.026.

46.

Calder, A.J.: The Oxford Handbook of Face Perception. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2011).

47.

Calder, A.J., Young, A.W.: Understanding the Recognition of Facial Identity and Facial Expression. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 6, 641–651 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1724.

48.

Haxby, J.V., Hoffman, E.A., Gobbini, M.I.: The Distributed Human Neural System for Face Perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 4, 223–233 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01482-0.

49.

Hole, G., Bourne, V.: Face Processing: Psychological, Neuropsychological, and Applied Perspectives. Oxford University Press, New York (2010).

50.

Kanwisher, N., Yovel, G.: The Fusiform Face Area: A Cortical Region Specialized for the Perception of Faces. Philosophical Transactions Of The Royal Society Of London. Series B, Biological Sciences. 361, (2006).

51.

Tsao, D.Y., Livingstone, M.S.: Mechanisms of Face Perception. Annual Review of Neuroscience. 31, 411–437 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.30.051606.094238.

52.

Valentine, T., Lewis, M.B., Hills, P.J.: Face-Space: A Unifying Concept in Face Recognition Research. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 69, 1996–2019 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2014.990392.

53.

Furl, N.: Face Recognition Algorithms and the Other-Race Effect: Computational Mechanisms for a Developmental Contact Hypothesis. Cognitive Science. 26, 797–815 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0364-0213(02)00084-8.

54.

Hole, G., Bourne, V.: Face Processing: Psychological, Neuropsychological, and Applied Perspectives. Oxford University Press, New York (2010).

55.

Kanwisher, N., Mcdermott, J., Chun, M.M.: The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception [open access]. Journal Of Neuroscience : The Official Journal Of The Society For Neuroscience. 17, (1997).

56.

Kuhl, P.K., Williams, K.A.: Linguistic Experience Alters Phonetic Perception in Infants by 6 Months of Age. Science. 255, 606–608 (1992).

57.

Lee, K., Byatt, G., Rhodes, G.: Caricature Effects, Distinctiveness, and Identification: Testing the Face-Space Framework. Psychological Science. 11, 379–385 (2000).

58.

Light, L.L., Kayra-Stuart, F., Hollander, S.: Recognition Memory for Typical and Unusual Faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory. 5, 212–228 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.5.3.212.

59.

McNeil, J.E., Warrington, E.K.: Prosopagnosia: A Face-Specific Disorder. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A. 46, 1–10 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1080/14640749308401064.

60.

Moscovitch, M., Winocur, G., Behrmann, M.: What Is Special about Face Recognition? Nineteen Experiments on a Person with Visual Object Agnosia and Dyslexia but Normal Face Recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 9, 555–604 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.1997.9.5.555.

61.

Perrett, D.I., Rolls, E.T., Caan, W.: Visual Neurones Responsive to Faces in the Monkey Temporal Cortex. Experimental Brain Research. 47, (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00239352.

62.

Sergent, J., Signoret, J.L.: Varieties of Functional Deficits in Prosopagnosia. Cerebral Cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991). 2, (1992).

63.

Tanaka, J.W., Simonyi, D.: The "Parts and Wholes” of Face Recognition: A Review of the Literature. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 69, 1876–1889 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2016.1146780.

64.

Thompson, P.: Margaret Thatcher: A New Illusion. Perception. 38, 483–484 (2009).

65.

Tsao, D.Y., Freiwald, W.A.: A Cortical Region Consisting Entirely of Face-Selective Cells. Science (New York, N.Y.). 311, (2006).

66.

Valentine, T., Bruce, V.: The Effects of Distinctiveness in Recognising and Classifying Faces. Perception. 15, (1986).

67.

Valentine, T.: A Unified Account of the Effects of Distinctiveness, Inversion, and Race in Face Recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A. 43, 161–204 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1080/14640749108400966.

68.

Young, A.W., Hellawell, D., Hay, D.C.: Configurational Information in Face Perception. Perception. 16, (1987).

69.

Sumner, P., Husain, M.: At the Edge of Consciousness: Automatic Motor Activation and Voluntary Control. The Neuroscientist. 14, 474–486 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1177/1073858408314435.

70.

Anderson, S.J., Yamagishi, N., Karavia, V.: Attentional Processes Link Perception and Action. Proceedings. Biological Sciences. 269, (2002).

71.

Biran, I., Chatterjee, A.: Alien Hand Syndrome. Archives of Neurology. 61, (2004).

72.

Della Sala, S., Marchetti, C., Spinnler, H.: Right-Sided Anarchic (Alien) Hand: A Longitudinal Study. Neuropsychologia. 29, 1113–1127 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(91)90081-I.

73.

Eimer, M., Schlaghecken, F.: Links Between Conscious Awareness and Response Inhibition: Evidence From Masked Priming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 9, 514–520 (2002). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196307.

74.

Eimer, M., Schlaghecken, F.: Effects of Masked Stimuli on Motor Activation: Behavioral and Electrophysiological Evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 24, 1737–1747 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.24.6.1737.

75.

Eimer, M., Schlaghecken, F.: Response Facilitation and Inhibition in Subliminal Priming. Biological Psychology. 64, 7–26 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-0511(03)00100-5.

76.

Grèzes, J., Tucker, M.: Objects Automatically Potentiate Action: An fMRI Study of Implicit Processing. European Journal of Neuroscience. 17, 2735–2740 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02695.x.

77.

Hermens, F., Sumner, P., Walker, R.: Inhibition of Masked Primes as Revealed by Saccade Curvature. Vision Research. 50, 46–56 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2009.10.008.

78.

Humphreys, G.W., Riddoch, M.J.: One More Cup of Coffee for the Road: Object- Action Assemblies, Response Blocking and Response Capture After Frontal Lobe Damage. In: Executive Control and the Frontal Lobe: Current Issues. pp. 81–93 (2000).

79.

Karremans, J.C., Stroebe, W., Claus, J.: Beyond Vicary’s Fantasies: The Impact of Subliminal Priming and Brand Choice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 42, 792–798 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2005.12.002.

80.

Mark, V.W.: Alien Hand Syndrome, https://www.jsmf.org/meetings/2008/may/Mark%20VW%202008%20Alien%20hand%20syndrome.pdf, (2007).

81.

Misirlisoy, E., Hermens, F.: Spatial Primes Produce Dissociated Inhibitory Effects on Saccadic Latencies and Trajectories. Vision Research. 96, 1–7 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2013.12.017.

82.

Paus, T., Kalina, M.: Medial vs Lateral Frontal Lobe Lesions and Differential Impairment of Central-Gaze Fixation Maintenance in Man. Brain. 114, 2051–2067 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/114.5.2051.

83.

Riddoch, M.J., Edwards, M.G.: Visual Affordances Direct Action: Neuropsychological Evidence From Manual Interference. Cognitive Neuropsychology. 15, 645–683 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1080/026432998381041.

84.

Sato, W., Okada, T., Toichi, M.: Attentional Shift by Gaze Is Triggered Without Awareness. Experimental Brain Research. 183, 87–94 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-007-1025-x.

85.

Schlaghecken, F., Klapp, S.T., Maylor, E.A.: Either or Neither, but Not Both: Locating the Effects of Masked Primes. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 276, 515–521 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2008.0933.

86.

Sumner, P., Nachev, P.: Human Medial Frontal Cortex Mediates Unconscious Inhibition of Voluntary Action. Neuron. 54, 697–711 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2007.05.016.

87.

Sumner, P., Husain, M.: At the Edge of Consciousness: Automatic Motor Activation and Voluntary Control. The Neuroscientist. 14, 474–486 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1177/1073858408314435.

88.

Tucker, M., Ellis, R.: On the Relations Between Seen Objects and Components of Potential Actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 24, 830–846 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.24.3.830.

89.

Chalmers, D.: What is a Neural Correlate of Consciousness?, http://consc.net/papers/ncc2.html.

90.

Haynes, J.D.: An Information-Based Approach to Consciousness: Mental State Decoding. (2015).

91.

Haynes, J.-D.: Decoding Visual Consciousness From Human Brain Signals. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 13, 194–202 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2009.02.004.

92.

Goldstein, E.B.: Cengage Learning. In: Sensation and Perception. Wadsworth, Belmont, Calif (2015).

93.

Goldstein, E.B.: Cengage Learning. In: Sensation and Perception (2015).

94.

Zanker, J.M.: Perception as Gateway to the World. In: Sensation, Perception and Action: An Evolutionary Perspective. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2010).

95.

Van Essen, D.C., Maunsell, J.H.R.: Hierarchical Organization and Functional Streams in the Visual Cortex. Trends in Neurosciences. 6, 370–375 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-2236(83)90167-4.

96.

Haynes, J.-D.: Decoding Visual Consciousness From Human Brain Signals. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 13, 194–202 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2009.02.004.

97.

Haynes, J.D.: An Information-Based Approach to Consciousness: Mental State Decoding. (2015).

98.

Crick, F., Koch, C.: Consciousness and Neuroscience. Cerebral Cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991). 8, (1998).

99.

Bartels, A., Logothetis, N.K., Moutoussis, K.: fMRI and Its Interpretations: An Illustration on Directional Selectivity in Area V5/MT. Trends in Neurosciences. 31, 444–453 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2008.06.004.

100.

Leopold, D.A., Logothetis, N.K.: Multistable Phenomena: Changing Views in Perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 3, 254–264 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01332-7.

101.

Buhusi, C.V., Meck, W.H.: What Makes Us Tick? Functional and Neural Mechanisms of Interval Timing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 6, 755–765 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1764.

102.

Grondin, S.: Timing and Time Perception: A Review of Recent Behavioral and Neuroscience Findings and Theoretical Directions. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics. 72, 561–582 (2010). https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.72.3.561.

103.

Johnston, A., Arnold, D.H., Nishida, S.: Spatially Localized Distortions of Event Time. Current Biology. 16, 472–479 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2006.01.032.

104.

Tse, P.U., Intriligator, J., Rivest, J., Cavanagh, P.: Attention and the Subjective Expansion of Time. Perception & Psychophysics. 66, 1171–1189 (2004). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196844.

105.

Kosslyn, S.M., Ganis, G., Thompson, W.L.: Neural Foundations of Imagery. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2, 635–642 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/35090055.

106.

Pylyshyn, Z.: Return of the Mental Image: Are There Really Pictures in the Brain? Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 7, 113–118 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00003-2.

107.

Pearson, J., Kosslyn, S.M.: The Heterogeneity of Mental Representation: Ending the Imagery Debate. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 112, 10089–10092 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1504933112.

108.

Cisek, P., Kalaska, J.F.: Neural Correlates of Mental Rehearsal in Dorsal Premotor Cortex. Nature. 431, 993–996 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03005.

109.

Cohen, M.S., Brookheimer, S.M., Breiter, G.J.: Changes in Cortical Activity During Mental Rotation: A Mapping Study Using Functional MRI. Brain. 119, 89–100 (1996).

110.

Ester, E.F., Serences, J.T., Awh, E.: Spatially Global Representations in Human Primary Visual Cortex during Working Memory Maintenance. Journal of Neuroscience. 29, 15258–15265 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4388-09.2009.

111.

Finke, R.A., Kurtzman, H.S.: Mapping the Visual Field in Mental Imagery. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 110, 501–517 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.110.4.501.

112.

Hubbard, T.L.: Auditory Imagery: Empirical Findings. Psychological Bulletin. 136, 302–329 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018436.

113.

Ishai, A., Sagi, D.: Common Mechanisms of Visual Imagery and Perception. Science. 268, 1772–1774 (1995).

114.

Jeannerod, M., Decety, J.: Mental Motor Imagery: A Window Into the Representational Stages of Action. Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 5, 727–732 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4388(95)80099-9.

115.

Kosslyn, S.M.: Image and Brain: The Resolution of the Imagery Debate. MIT, Cambridge, Mass (1994).

116.

Kosslyn, S.M., Ganis, G., Thompson, W.L.: Neural Foundations of Imagery. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2, 635–642 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/35090055.

117.

Kosslyn, S.M., Thompson, W.L., Klm, I.J., Alpert, N.M.: Topographical Representations of Mental Images in Primary Visual Cortex. Nature. 378, 496–498 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1038/378496a0.

118.

Kosslyn, S.M., Behrmann, M., Jeannerod, M.: The Cognitive Neuroscience of Mental Imagery. Neuropsychologia. 33, 1335–1344 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(95)00067-D.

119.

Kosslyn, S.M.: The Role of Area 17 in Visual Imagery: Convergent Evidence from PET and rTMS. Science. 284, 167–170 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.284.5411.167.

120.

Kosslyn, S.M., Thompson, W.L.: When Is Early Visual Cortex Activated During Visual Mental Imagery? Psychological Bulletin. 129, 723–746 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.5.723.

121.

Linden, D.E.J., Thornton, K., Kuswanto, C.N., Johnston, S.J., van de Ven, V., Jackson, M.C.: The Brain’s Voices: Comparing Nonclinical Auditory Hallucinations and Imagery. Cerebral Cortex. 21, 330–337 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhq097.

122.

Parsons, L.M.: Imagined Spatial Transformations of One’s Hands and Feet. Cognitive Psychology. 19, 178–241 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(87)90011-9.

123.

Pearson, J., Kosslyn, S.M.: The Heterogeneity of Mental Representation: Ending the Imagery Debate. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 112, 10089–10092 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1504933112.

124.

Perky, C.W.: An Experimental Study of Imagination. The American Journal of Psychology. 21, 422–452 (1910). https://doi.org/10.2307/1413350.

125.

Pylyshyn, Z.: Return of the Mental Image: Are There Really Pictures in the Brain? Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 7, 113–118 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00003-2.

126.

Rich, A.N., Williams, M.A., Puce, A., Syngeniotis, A., Howard, M.A., McGlone, F., Mattingley, J.B.: Neural Correlates of Imagined and Synaesthetic Colours. Neuropsychologia. 44, 2918–2925 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.06.024.

127.

Shepard, R.N., Metzler, J.: Mental Rotation of Three-Dimensional Objects. Science. 171, 701–703 (1971).

128.

Thompson, P.: Margaret Thatcher: A New Illusion. Perception. 38, 483–484 (2009).

129.

Tootell, R.B.H., Hadjikhani, N., Hall, E.K., Marrett, S., Vanduffel, W., Vaughan, J.T., Dale, A.M.: The Retinotopy of Visual Spatial Attention. Neuron. 21, 1409–1422 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80659-5.

130.

Silverman, M.S., Switkes, E., De Valois, R.L.: Deoxyglucose Analysis of Retinotopic Organization in Primate Striate Cortex. Science. 218, 902–904 (1982).

131.

Rensink, R.A.: Change Detection. Annual Review of Psychology. 53, 245–277 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135125.

132.

Simons, D.J., Rensink, R.A.: Change Blindness: Past, Present, and Future. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 9, 16–20 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.11.006.

133.

Beck, D.M.: Right Parietal Cortex Plays a Critical Role in Change Blindness. Cerebral Cortex. 16, 712–717 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhj017.

134.

Beck, D.M., Rees, G., Frith, C.D., Lavie, N.: Neural Correlates of Change Detection and Change Blindness. Nature Neuroscience. 4, 645–650 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/88477.

135.

Cherry, E.C.: Some Experiments on the Recognition of Speech, With One and With Two Ears. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 25, 975–979 (1953). https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1907229.

136.

Eramudugolla, R., Irvine, D.R.F., McAnally, K.I., Martin, R.L., Mattingley, J.B.: Directed Attention Eliminates ‘Change Deafness’ in Complex Auditory Scenes. Current Biology. 15, 1108–1113 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2005.05.051.

137.

McConkie, G.W., Currie, C.B.: Visual Stability Across Saccades While Viewing Complex Pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 22, 563–581 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.22.3.563.

138.

Henderson, J.M., Hollingworth, A.: High-Level Scene Perception. Annual Review of Psychology. 50, 243–271 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.243.

139.

O’Regan, J.K.: ‘Mud Splashes’ Render Picture Changes Invisible [open access]. Invest. Opthamol. Vis. Sci. 37,.

140.

Rensink, R.A.: Change Detection. Annual Review of Psychology. 53, 245–277 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135125.

141.

Rensink, R.A., O’Regan, J.K., Clark, J.J.: To See or Not to See: The Need for Attention to Perceive Changes in Scenes. Psychological Science. 8, 368–373 (1997).

142.

Simons, D.J., Ambinder, M.S.: Change Blindness: Theory and Consequences. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 14, 44–48 (2005).

143.

Vitevitch, M.S.: Change Deafness: The Inability to Detect Changes Between Two Voices. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 29, 333–342 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.29.2.333.

144.

Howard, R.J.: The Functional Anatomy of Imagining and Perceiving Colour [open access]. NeuroReport. 9, 1019–1023 (1998).

145.

Adair, J.C., Schwartz, R.L., Na, D.L., Fennell, E., Gilmore, R.L., Heilman, K.M.: Anosognosia: Examining the Disconnection Hypothesis. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 63, 798–800 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.63.6.798.

146.

Berti, A., Spinazzola, L., Pia, L., Rabuffetti, M., Haggard, P., Rossetti, Y., Kawato, M.: Motor Awareness and Motor Intention in Anosognosia for Hemiplegia. In: Sensorimotor Foundations of Higher Cognition. pp. 163–181. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2008).

147.

Berti, A., Bottini, G., Gandola, M., Pia, L., Smania, N., Stracciari, A., Castiglioni, I., Vallar, G., Paulesu, E.: Shared Cortical Anatomy for Motor Awareness and Motor Control. Science. 309, 488–491 (2005).

148.

Bisiach, E., Vallar, G., Perani, D., Papagno, C., Berti, A.: Unawareness of Disease Following Lesions of the Right Hemisphere: Anosognosia for Hemiplegia and Anosognosia for Hemianopia. Neuropsychologia. 24, 471–482 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(86)90092-8.

149.

Cappa, S., Sterzi, R., Vallar, G., Bisiach, E.: Remission of Hemineglect and Anosognosia During Vestibular Stimulation. Neuropsychologia. 25, 775–782 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(87)90115-1.

150.

Carpenter, K., Berti, A., Oxbury, S., Molyneux, A.J., Bisiach, E., Oxbury, J.M.: Awareness of and Memory for Arm Weakness During Intracarotid Sodium Amytal Testing. Brain. 118, 243–251 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/118.1.243.

151.

Cocchini, G., Beschin, N., Sala, S.D.: Chronic Anosognosia: A Case Report and Theoretical Account. Neuropsychologia. 40, 2030–2038 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00054-4.

152.

Cutting, J.: Study of Anosognosia. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 41, 548–555 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.41.6.548.

153.

Davies, M., Davies, A.A., Coltheart, M.: Anosognosia and the Two-Factor Theory of Delusions. Mind and Language. 20, 209–236 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0268-1064.2005.00283.x.

154.

Fasold, O., von Brevern, M., Kuhberg, M., Ploner, C.J., Villringer, A., Lempert, T., Wenzel, R.: Human Vestibular Cortex as Identified With Caloric Stimulation in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging. NeuroImage. 17, 1384–1393 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2002.1241.

155.

Fotopoulou, A., Pernigo, S., Maeda, R., Rudd, A., Kopelman, M.A.: Implicit Awareness in Anosognosia for Hemiplegia: Unconscious Interference Without Conscious Re-Representation. Brain. 133, 3564–3577 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awq233.

156.

Fotopoulou, A., Rudd, A., Holmes, P., Kopelman, M.: Self-Observation Reinstates Motor Awareness in Anosognosia for Hemiplegia. Neuropsychologia. 47, 1256–1260 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.01.018.

157.

Frith, C.D., Blakemore, S.-J., Wolpert, D.M.: Abnormalities in the Awareness and Control of Action. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences. 355, 1771–1788 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2000.0734.

158.

Garbarini, F., Rabuffetti, M., Piedimonte, A., Pia, L., Ferrarin, M., Frassinetti, F., Gindri, P., Cantagallo, A., Driver, J., Berti, A.: ‘Moving’ a Paralysed Hand: Bimanual Coupling Effect in Patients With Anosognosia for Hemiplegia. Brain. 135, 1486–1497 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/aws015.

159.

Gold, M., Adair, J.C., Jacobs, D.H., Heilman, K.M.: Anosognosia for Hemiplegia: An Electrophysiologic Investigation of the Feed-Forward Hypothesis. Neurology. 44, 1804–1804 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.44.10.1804.

160.

Heilman, K.M.: Possible Mechanisms of Anosognosia of Hemiplegia. Cortex. 61, 30–42 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2014.06.007.

161.

Heilman, K.M., Barrett, A.M., Adair, J.C.: Possible Mechanisms of Anosognosia: A Defect in Self–awareness. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences. 353, 1903–1909 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1998.0342.

162.

Karnath, H.-O.: Awareness of the Functioning of One’s Own Limbs Mediated by the Insular Cortex? Journal of Neuroscience. 25, 7134–7138 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1590-05.2005.

163.

Levine, D.N.: Unawareness of Visual and Sensorimotor Defects: A Hypothesis. Brain and Cognition. 13, 233–281 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2626(90)90052-P.

164.

Lu, L.H., Barrett, A.M., Schwartz, R.L., Cibula, J.E., Gilmore, R.L., Uthman, B.M., Heilman, K.M.: Anosognosia and Confabulation During the Wada Test. Neurology. 49, 1316–1322 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.49.5.1316.

165.

Lu, H.L., Barrett, M.A., Cibula, E.J., Gilmore, L.R., Heilman, M.K.: Proprioception More Impaired Distally Than Proximally in Subjects With Hemispheric Dysfunction. Neurology. 55, 596–597 (2000).

166.

Marcel, A.J.: Slippage in the Unity of Consciousness. In: Experimental and Theoretical Studies of Consciousness. Wiley, Chichester (1993).

167.

Marcel, A.J.: Slippage in the Unity of Consciousness. In: Experimental and Theoretical Studies of Consciousness. pp. 168–186. Wiley, Chichester (1993). https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470514412.ch9.

168.

Marcel, A., Tegner, R., Nimmosmith, I.: Anosognosia for Plegia: Specificity, Extension, Partiality and Disunity of Bodily Unawareness. Cortex. 40, 19–40 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70919-5.

169.

McKay, R., Tamagni, C., Palla, A., Krummenacher, P., Hegemann, S.C.A., Straumann, D., Brugger, P.: Vestibular Stimulation Attenuates Unrealistic Optimism. Cortex. 49, 2272–2275 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2013.04.005.

170.

Nathanson, M.: Denial of Illness: Its Occurrence in One Hundred Cases of Hemiplegia. A.M.A. Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry. 68, 380–387 (1952). https://doi.org/10.1001/archneurpsyc.1952.02320210090010.

171.

Nardone, I.B., Ward, R., Fotopoulou, A., Turnbull, O.H.: Attention and Emotion in Anosognosia: Evidence of Implicit Awareness and Repression? Neurocase. 13, 438–445 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/13554790701881749.

172.

Pia, L., Neppi-Modona, M., Ricci, R., Berti, A.: The Anatomy of Anosognosia for Hemiplegia: A Meta-Analysis. Cortex. 40, 367–377 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70131-X.

173.

Orfei, M.D., Robinson, R.G., Prigatano, G.P., Starkstein, S., Rusch, N., Bria, P., Caltagirone, C., Spalletta, G.: Anosognosia for Hemiplegia After Stroke Is a Multifaceted Phenomenon: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Brain. 130, 3075–3090 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awm106.

174.

Pia, L., Neppi-Modona, M., Ricci, R., Berti, A.: The Anatomy of Anosognosia for Hemiplegia: A Meta-Analysis. Cortex. 40, 367–377 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70131-X.

175.

Ramachandran, V.S.: Anosognosia in Parietal Lobe Syndrome. Consciousness and Cognition. 4, 22–51 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1006/ccog.1995.1002.

176.

Sharot, T., Korn, C.W., Dolan, R.J.: How Unrealistic Optimism Is Maintained in the Face of Reality. Nature Neuroscience. 14, 1475–1479 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2949.

177.

Small, M., Ellis, S.: Denial of Hemiplegia: An Investigation Into the Theories of Causation. European Neurology. 36, 353–363 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1159/000117293.

178.

Turnbull, O.H., Fotopoulou, A., Solms, M.: Anosognosia as Motivated Unawareness: The ‘Defence’ Hypothesis Revisited. Cortex. 61, 18–29 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2014.10.008.

179.

Vuilleumier, P.: Anosognosia: The Neurology of Beliefs and Uncertainties. Cortex. 40, 9–17 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70918-3.

180.

Weinstein, E.A.: Anosognosia and Denial of Illness. In: Awareness of Deficit After Brain Injury. pp. 240–257. Oxford University Press, New York (1991).

181.

Weinstein, E.A., Kahn, R.L.: Denial of Illness: Symbolic and Physiological Aspects. Thomas, Springfield, Ill (1955).

182.

Bradshaw, J.L., Mattingley, J.B.: Clinical Neuropsychology: Behavioral and Brain Science. Academic Press, San Diego (1995).

183.

Bradshaw, J.L., Mattingley, J.B.: Clinical Neuropsychology: Behavioral and Brain Science. Academic Press, San Diego (1995).

184.

Milner, A.D., Goodale, M.A.: The Visual Brain in Action. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2006).

185.

Milner, A.D., Goodale, M.A.: The Visual Brain in Action. Oxford University Press, Incorporated, Oxford (2006).

186.

Robertson, I.H., Marshall, J.C.: Unilateral Neglect: Clinical and Experimental Studies. Erlbaum, Hove (1993).

187.

Berti, A., Rizzolatti, G.: Visual Processing Without Awareness: Evidence From Unilateral Neglect. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 4, 345–351 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.1992.4.4.345.

188.

Cappa, S., Sterzi, R., Vallar, G., Bisiach, E.: Remission of Hemineglect and Anosognosia During Vestibular Stimulation. Neuropsychologia. 25, 775–782 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(87)90115-1.

189.

de Haan, B., Karnath, H.-O., Driver, J.: Mechanisms and Anatomy of Unilateral Extinction After Brain Injury. Neuropsychologia. 50, 1045–1053 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.02.015.

190.

Dennett Daniel, C.: Filling in Versus Finding Out: A Ubiquitous Confusion in Cognitive Science. In: Cognition, Conception, and Methodological Issues. American Psychological Association (1992).

191.

Churchland, P.S., Ramachandran, V.S.: Filling In: Why Dennett Is Wrong. In: Perception. pp. 132–157. Oxford University Press, New York (1993).

192.

Duncan, J., Humphreys, G., Ward, R.: Competitive Brain Activity in Visual Attention. Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 7, 255–261 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4388(97)80014-1.

193.

Fasold, O., von Brevern, M., Kuhberg, M., Ploner, C.J., Villringer, A., Lempert, T., Wenzel, R.: Human Vestibular Cortex as Identified With Caloric Stimulation in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging. NeuroImage. 17, 1384–1393 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2002.1241.

194.

Husain, M., Nachev, P.: Space and the Parietal Cortex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 11, 30–36 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.10.011.

195.

Marshall, J.C., Halligan, P.W.: Blindsight and Insight in Visuo-Spatial Neglect. Nature. 336, 766–767 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1038/336766a0.

196.

Mattingley, J.B., Driver, J., Beschin, N., Robertson, I.H.: Attentional Competition Between Modalities: Extinction Between Touch and Vision After Right Hemisphere Damage. Neuropsychologia. 35, 867–880 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(97)00008-0.

197.

Rizzolatti, G., Berti, A.: Neural Mechanisms of Spatial Neglect. In: Unilateral Neglect. pp. 87–106. L.Erlbaum (2013).

198.

Robertson, I.H., Heutink, J.: Rehabilitation of Unilateral Neglect. In: Neuropsychological Rehabilitation: A Cognitive Approach. Boom, Amsterdam (2002).

199.

Rode, G., Charles, N., Perenin, M.-T., Vighetto, A., Trillet, M., Aimard, G.: Partial Remission of Hemiplegia and Somatoparaphrenia Through Vestibular Stimulation in a Case of Unilateral Neglect. Cortex. 28, 203–208 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(13)80048-2.

200.

Singh-Curry, V., Husain, M.: Rehabilitation of Neglect. In: Cognitive Neurorehabilitation: Evidence and Application. pp. 449–463. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010).

201.

Torjussen, T.: Visual Processing in Cortically Blind Hemifields. Neuropsychologia. 16, 15–21 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(78)90038-6.

202.

Vallar, G.: Spatial Hemineglect in Humans. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2, 87–97 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(98)01145-0.

203.

Vallar, G., Bottini, G., Rusconi, M.L., Sterzi, R.: Exploring Somatosensory Hemineglect by Vestibular Stimulation. Brain. 116, 71–86 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/116.1.71.

204.

Vallar, G., Sterzi, R., Bottini, G., Cappa, S., Rusconi, M.L.: Temporary Remission of Left Hemianesthesia After Vestibular Stimulation. a Sensory Neglect Phenomenon. Cortex. 26, 123–131 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(13)80078-0.

205.

Vallar, G., Rusconi, M.L., Bignamini, L., Geminiani, G., Perani, D.: Anatomical Correlates of Visual and Tactile Extinction in Humans: A Clinical Ct Scan Study. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 57, 464–470 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.57.4.464.

206.

Vallar, G.: Spatial Hemineglect in Humans. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2, 87–97 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(98)01145-0.

207.

Volpe, B.T., Ledoux, J.E., Gazzaniga, M.S.: Information Processing of Visual Stimuli in an ‘Extinguished’ Field. Nature. 282, 722–724 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1038/282722a0.

208.

Walker, R., Mattingley, J.B.: Ghosts in the Machine? Pathological Visual Completion Phenomena in the Damaged Brain. Neurocase. 3, 313–335 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1080/13554799708411972.

209.

Walker, R., Young, A.W.: Object-Based Neglect: An Investigation of the Contributions of Eye Movements and Perceptual Completion. Cortex. 32, 279–295 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(96)80051-7.

210.

Weil, R.S., Plant, G.T., James-Galton, M., Rees, G.: Neural Correlates of Hemianopic Completion Across the Vertical Meridian. Neuropsychologia. 47, 457–464 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.09.020.

211.

Young, A.W., Hellawell, D.J., Welch, J.: Neglect and Visual Recognition. Brain. 115, 51–71 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/115.1.51.

212.

Williams, B.: The Self and the Future. The Philosophical Review. 79, 161–180 (1970). https://doi.org/10.2307/2183946.

213.

Goldstein, R.N.: Extract - Identity Crisis. In: Betraying Spinoza: The Renegade Jew Who Gave Us Modernity. pp. 124–125. Nextbook/Shocken, New York (2006).

214.

Broks, P.: To be Two or Not to Be. In: Into the Silent Land. pp. 204–225. Atlantic Books, London (2003).

215.

Hofstadter, D.: Prelude… Ant Fugue. In: Gödel, Escher, Bach : An Eternal Golden Braid. pp. 275–336. Basic Books (1945).

216.

Dennet, D.: Where am I. In: The Mind’s I. pp. 217–231. Penguin, Harmondsworth (1982).

217.

von Hippel, W., Trivers, R.: The Evolution and Psychology of Self-Deception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 34, 1–16 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X10001354.

218.

Lamba, S., Nityananda, V.: Self-Deceived Individuals Are Better at Deceiving Others. PLoS ONE. 9, (2014). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0104562.

219.

Van Leeuwen, D.S.N.: The Spandrels of Self-Deception: Prospects for a Biological Theory of a Mental Phenomenon. Philosophical Psychology. 20, 329–348 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1080/09515080701197148.

220.

Mele, A.R.: Real self-deception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 20, 91–102 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X97000034.

221.

Kurzban, R.: Why Everyone (Else) Is a Hypocrite: Evolution and the Modular Mind. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey (2012).

222.

Kurzban, R.: Why Everyone (Else) Is a Hypocrite: Evolution and the Modular Mind. (2010).

223.

Johansson, P., Hall, L., Sikström, S., Olsson, A.: Failure to Detect Mismatches Between Intention and Outcome in a Simple Decision Task. Science. 310, 116–119 (2005).

224.

McKay, R.: Isn’t it ironic? A review of ‘Why Everyone (Else) is a Hypocrite: Evolution and the Modular Mind’. Evolution and Human Behavior. 32, 444–446 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2011.04.005.

225.

Tappin, B.M., van der Leer, L., McKay, R.T.: The Heart Trumps the Head: Desirability Bias in Political Belief Revision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 146, 1143–1149 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000298.

226.

van der Leer, L., McKay, R.: The Optimist Within? Selective Sampling and Self-Deception. Consciousness and Cognition. 50, 23–29 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2016.07.005.

227.

Nir, Y., Tononi, G.: Dreaming and the brain: from phenomenology to neurophysiology. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 14, 88–100 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2009.12.001.

228.

Dresler, M., Wehrle, R., Spoormaker, V.I., Koch, S.P., Holsboer, F., Steiger, A., Obrig, H., Sämann, P.G., Czisch, M.: Neural Correlates of Dream Lucidity Obtained from Contrasting Lucid versus Non-Lucid REM Sleep: A Combined EEG/fMRI Case Study. Sleep. 35, 1017–1020 (2012). https://doi.org/10.5665/sleep.1974.

229.

Southwick, S.M., Davis, M., Horner, B., Cahill, L., Morgan, C.A., Gold, P.E., Bremner, J.D., Charney, D.C.: Relationship of Enhanced Norepinephrine Activity During Memory Consolidation to Enhanced Long-Term Memory in Humans. American Journal of Psychiatry. 159, 1420–1422 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.159.8.1420.

230.

Stickgold, R.: Replaying the Game: Hypnagogic Images in Normals and Amnesics. Science. 290, 350–353 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.290.5490.350.

231.

Siclari, F., Baird, B., Perogamvros, L., Bernardi, G., LaRocque, J.J., Riedner, B., Boly, M., Postle, B.R., Tononi, G.: The neural correlates of dreaming. Nature Neuroscience. 20, 872–878 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4545.

232.

Hobson, J.A., Pace-Schott, E.F., Stickgold, R.: Dreaming and the brain: Toward a cognitive neuroscience  of conscious states. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 23, 793–842 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00003976.

233.

Hobson, J.A.: REM sleep and dreaming: towards a theory of protoconsciousness. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 10, 803–813 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2716.

234.

Solms, M.: Dreaming and REM sleep are controlled by different  brain mechanisms. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 23, 843–850 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00003988.

235.

Mark Solms: Freud Returns. Scientific American. 290, (2004).

236.

Freudian dream theory today | The Psychologist, https://thepsychologist.bps.org.uk/volume-13/edition-12/freudian-dream-theory-today-0.

237.

Revonsuo, A.: The reinterpretation of dreams: An evolutionary hypothesis of the function of dreaming. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 23, 877–901 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00004015.

238.

KATJA VALLI and ANTTI REVONSUO: The threat simulation theory in light of recent empirical evidence: A review. The American Journal of Psychology. 122, (2009).

239.

Valli, K., Strandholm, T., Sillanmäki, L., Revonsuo, A.: Dreams are more negative than real life: Implications for the function of dreaming. Cognition & Emotion. 22, 833–861 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930701541591.

240.

Valli, K., Revonsuo, A., Pälkäs, O., Ismail, K.H., Ali, K.J., Punamäki, R.-L.: The threat simulation theory of the evolutionary function of dreaming: Evidence from dreams of traumatized children. Consciousness and Cognition. 14, 188–218 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-8100(03)00019-9.

241.

Revonsuo, Antti: The Avatars in the Machine: Dreaming as a Simulation of Social Reality. https://doi.org/10.15502/9783958570375.