[1]
Bialystok, E. et al. 2012. Bilingualism: Consequences for Mind and Brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 16, 4 (2012), 240–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2012.03.001.
   
  
    [2]
Binder, J.R. et al. 2009. Where Is the Semantic System? A Critical Review and Meta-Analysis of 120 Functional Neuroimaging Studies. Cerebral Cortex. 19, 12 (2009), 2767–2796. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhp055.
   
  
    [3]
Carey, D. et al. 2017. Functional and Quantitative MRI Mapping of Somatomotor Representations of Human Supralaryngeal Vocal Tract. Cerebral Cortex. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhw393.
   
  
    [4]
Castles, A. et al. 2018. Ending the Reading Wars: Reading Acquisition From Novice to Expert. Psychological Science in the Public Interest. 19, 1 (2018), 5–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100618772271.
   
  
    [5]
Castles, A. and Coltheart, M. 2004. Is There a Causal Link From Phonological Awareness to Success in Learning to Read? Cognition. 91, 1 (2004), 77–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00164-1.
   
  
    [6]
Chesters, J. et al. 2018. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Over Left Inferior Frontal Cortex Improves Speech Fluency in Adults Who Stutter. Brain. 141, 4 (2018), 1161–1171. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awy011.
   
  
    [7]
Cook, V. 2003. Introduction: The Changing L1 in the L2 User’s Mind. Effects of the Second Language on the First. Multilingual Matters. 1–18.
   
  
    [8]
Corballis, M.C. 1999. The Gestural Origins of Language: Human Language May Have Evolved From Manual Gestures, Which Survive Today as a ‘Behavioral Fossil’ Coupled to Speech. American Scientist. 87, 2 (1999), 138–145.
   
  
    [9]
Cortese, M.J. and Schock, J. 2013. Imageability and Age of Acquisition Effects in Disyllabic Word Recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 66, 5 (2013), 946–972. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2012.722660.
   
  
    [10]
Davis, M.H. and Gaskell, M.G. 2009. A Complementary Systems Account of Word Learning: Neural and Behavioural Evidence. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 364, 1536 (2009), 3773–3800. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0111.
   
  
    [11]
Dehaene, S. et al. 2010. How Learning to Read Changes the Cortical Networks for Vision and Language. Science. 330, 6009 (2010), 1359–1364. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1194140.
   
  
    [12]
Dehaene, S. and Cohen, L. 2011. The Unique Role of the Visual Word Form Area in Reading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 15, 6 (2011), 254–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.04.003.
   
  
    [13]
Dronkers, N.F. et al. 2007. Paul Broca’s Historic Cases: High Resolution Mr Imaging of the Brains of Leborgne and Lelong. Brain. 130, 5 (2007), 1432–1441. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awm042.
   
  
    [14]
Duff, F.J. and Hulme, C. 2012. The Role of Children’s Phonological and Semantic Knowledge in Learning to Read Words. Scientific Studies of Reading. 16, 6 (2012), 504–525. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2011.598199.
   
  
    [15]
Dumay, N. and Gaskell, M.G. 2007. Sleep-Associated Changes in the Mental Representation of Spoken Words. Psychological Science. 18, 1 (2007), 35–39.
   
  
    [16]
Goldin-Meadow, S. and Mylander, C. 1998. Spontaneous Sign Systems Created by Deaf Children in Two Cultures. Nature. 391, 6664 (1998), 279–281. https://doi.org/10.1038/34646.
   
  
    [17]
Hauk, O. et al. 2004. Somatotopic Representation of Action Words in Human Motor and Premotor Cortex. Neuron. 41, 2 (2004), 301–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00838-9.
   
  
    [18]
Hay, J. and Drager, K. 2007. Sociophonetics. Annual Review of Anthropology. 36, (2007), 89–103.
   
  
    [19]
Henderson, L.M. et al. 2012. Consolidation of Vocabulary Is Associated With Sleep in Children. Developmental Science. 15, 5 (2012), 674–687. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2012.01172.x.
   
  
    [20]
Hickok, G. 2012. Computational Neuroanatomy of Speech Production. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 13, 2 (2012), 135–145. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3158.
   
  
    [21]
Hickok, G. and Poeppel, D. 2007. The Cortical Organization of Speech Processing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 8, 5 (2007), 393–402. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2113.
   
  
    [22]
Johnson, K. et al. 1999. Auditory–Visual Integration of Talker Gender in Vowel Perception. Journal of Phonetics. 27, 4 (1999), 359–384. https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1999.0100.
   
  
    [23]
Kearney, E. and Guenther, F.H. 2019. Articulating: The Neural Mechanisms of Speech Production. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience. 34, 9 (2019), 1214–1229. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2019.1589541.
   
  
    [24]
Kirby, S. et al. 2008. Cumulative Cultural Evolution in the Laboratory: An Experimental Approach to the Origins of Structure in Human Language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 105, 31 (2008), 10681–10686. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0707835105.
   
  
    [25]
Kutas, M. and Federmeier, K.D. 2000. Electrophysiology Reveals Semantic Memory Use in Language Comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 4, 12 (2000), 463–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01560-6.
   
  
    [26]
Ladefoged, P. 1975. A Course in Phonetics. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
   
  
    [27]
Levinson, S.C. 1997. Language and Cognition: The Cognitive Consequences of Spatial Description in Guugu Yimithirr. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology. 7, 1 (1997), 98–131. https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.1997.7.1.98.
   
  
    [28]
Linck, J.A. et al. 2009. Losing Access to the Native Language While Immersed in a Second Language: Evidence for the Role of Inhibition in Second-Language Learning. Psychological Science. 20, 12 (2009), 1507–1515. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02480.x.
   
  
    [29]
Loftus, E.F. and Palmer, J.C. 1974. Reconstruction of Automobile Destruction: An Example of the Interaction Between Language and Memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 13, 5 (1974), 585–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(74)80011-3.
   
  
    [30]
Lucy, J.A. and Gaskins, S. 2001. Grammatical Categories and the Development of Classification Preferences: A Comparative Approach. Language Acquisition and Conceptual Development. Cambridge University Press. 257–283.
   
  
    [31]
Manis, F.R. et al. 1996. On the Bases of Two Subtypes of Development Dyslexia. Cognition. 58, 2 (1996), 157–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(95)00679-6.
   
  
    [32]
Mano, Q.R. et al. 2013. The Role of Left Occipitotemporal Cortex in Reading: Reconciling Stimulus, Task, and Lexicality Effects. Cerebral Cortex. 23, 4 (2013), 988–1001. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhs093.
   
  
    [33]
McCandliss, B.D. et al. 2003. The Visual Word Form Area: Expertise for Reading in the Fusiform Gyrus. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 7, 7 (2003), 293–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00134-7.
   
  
    [34]
McClelland, J.L. et al. 1995. Why There Are Complementary Learning Systems in the Hippocampus and Neocortex: Insights From the Successes and Failures of Connectionist Models of Learning and Memory. Psychological Review. 102, 3 (1995), 419–457. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.102.3.419.
   
  
    [35]
PALS0009 Introduction to Speech Science: Audio signals and systems: https://www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/courses/pals0009/week3.php.
   
  
    [36]
PALS0009 Introduction to Speech Science: Consonants: https://www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/courses/pals0009/week6.php.
   
  
    [37]
PALS0009 Introduction to Speech Science: Voice: https://www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/courses/pals0009/week4.php.
   
  
    [38]
PALS0009 Introduction to Speech Science: Vowels: https://www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/courses/pals0009/week5.php.
   
  
    [39]
Patterson, K. et al. 2007. Where Do You Know What You Know? the Representation of Semantic Knowledge in the Human Brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 8, 12 (2007), 976–987. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2277.
   
  
    [40]
Price, C.J. and Devlin, J.T. 2011. The Interactive Account of Ventral Occipitotemporal Contributions to Reading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 15, 6 (2011), 246–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.04.001.
   
  
    [41]
Purcell, J.J. et al. 2014. Beyond the Visual Word Form Area: The Orthography–semantics Interface in Spelling and Reading. Cognitive Neuropsychology. 31, 5–6 (2014), 482–510. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2014.909399.
   
  
    [42]
Quiroga, R.Q. et al. 2005. Invariant Visual Representation by Single Neurons in the Human Brain. Nature. 435, 7045 (2005), 1102–1107. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03687.
   
  
    [43]
Rapcsak, S.Z. et al. 2009. Phonological Dyslexia and Dysgraphia: Cognitive Mechanisms and Neural Substrates. Cortex. 45, 5 (2009), 575–591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2008.04.006.
   
  
    [44]
Rastle, K. et al. 2011. Orthography Influences the Perception and Production of Speech. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 37, 6 (2011), 1588–1594.
   
  
    [45]
Rauschecker, J.P. and Scott, S.K. 2009. Maps and Streams in the Auditory Cortex: Nonhuman Primates Illuminate Human Speech Processing. Nature Neuroscience. 12, 6 (2009), 718–724. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2331.
   
  
    [46]
Raviv, L. et al. 2019. Larger Communities Create More Systematic Languages. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 286, 1907 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.1262.
   
  
    [47]
Rayner, K. et al. 2001. How Psychological Science Informs the Teaching of Reading. Psychological Science. 2, 2 (2001), 31–74.
   
  
    [48]
Ricketts, J. et al. 2007. Vocabulary Is Important for Some, but Not All Reading Skills. Scientific Studies of Reading. 11, 3 (2007), 235–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888430701344306.
   
  
    [49]
Ross, M. et al. 2002. Language and the Bicultural Self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 28, 8 (2002), 1040–1050. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672022811003.
   
  
    [50]
Rueckl, J.G. et al. 2015. Universal Brain Signature of Proficient Reading: Evidence From Four Contrasting Languages. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 112, 50 (2015), 15510–15515. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1509321112.
   
  
    [51]
Schick, B. et al. 2007. Language and Theory of Mind: A Study of Deaf Children. Child Development. 78, 2 (2007), 376–396. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01004.x.
   
  
    [52]
Schooler, J.W. and Engstler-Schooler, T.Y. 1990. Verbal Overshadowing of Visual Memories: Some Things Are Better Left Unsaid. Cognitive Psychology. 22, 1 (1990), 36–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(90)90003-M.
   
  
    [53]
Schreiner, T. and Rasch, B. 2015. Boosting Vocabulary Learning by Verbal Cueing During Sleep. Cerebral Cortex. 25, 11 (2015), 4169–4179. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhu139.
   
  
    [54]
Schwartz, A.I. and Kroll, J.F. 2006. Bilingual Lexical Activation in Sentence Context. Journal of Memory and Language. 55, 2 (2006), 197–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2006.03.004.
   
  
    [55]
Seidenberg, M.S. 2013. The Science of Reading and Its Educational Implications. Language Learning and Development. 9, 4 (2013), 331–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2013.812017.
   
  
    [56]
Senghas, A. et al. 2004. Children Creating Core Properties of Language: Evidence from an Emerging Sign Language in Nicaragua. Science. 305, 5691 (2004), 1779–1782.
   
  
    [57]
Singleton, J.L. and Newport, E.L. 2004. When Learners Surpass Their Models: The Acquisition of American Sign Language From Inconsistent Input. Cognitive Psychology. 49, 4 (2004), 370–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2004.05.001.
   
  
    [58]
Spaepen, E. et al. 2011. Number Without a Language Model. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 108, 8 (2011), 3163–3168. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1015975108.
   
  
    [59]
Spivey, M.J. and Marian, V. 1999. Cross Talk Between Native and Second Languages: Partial Activation of an Irrelevant Lexicon. Psychological Science. 10, 3 (1999), 281–284. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00151.
   
  
    [60]
Tamminen, J. 2015. Lexical Consolidation. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. J.D. Wright, ed. Elsevier. 920–925.
   
  
    [61]
Tamminen, J. et al. 2010. Sleep Spindle Activity is Associated with the Integration of New Memories and Existing Knowledge. Journal of Neuroscience. 30, 43 (2010), 14356–14360.
   
  
    [62]
Tamminen, J. et al. 2012. The Role of Memory Consolidation in Generalisation of New Linguistic Information. Cognition. 125, 1 (2012), 107–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.06.014.
   
  
    [63]
Tamminen, J. and Gaskell, M.G. 2013. Novel Word Integration in the Mental Lexicon: Evidence From Unmasked and Masked Semantic Priming. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 66, 5 (2013), 1001–1025. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2012.724694.
   
  
    [64]
Tanenhaus, M.K. et al. 1995. Integration of Visual and Linguistic Information in Spoken Language Comprehension. Science. 268, 5217 (1995).
   
  
    [65]
Taylor, J.S.H. et al. 2015. How Word Meaning Influences Word Reading. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 24, 4 (2015), 322–328. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721415574980.
   
  
    [66]
Taylor, J.S.H. 2011. The Influence of Consistency, Frequency, and Semantics on Learning to Read: An Artificial Orthography Paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 37, 1 (2011), 60–76.
   
  
    [67]
Trauzettel-Klosinski, S. and Dietz, K. 2012. Standardized Assessment of Reading Performance: The New International Reading Speed Texts IReST. Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science. 53, 9 (2012), 5452–5461. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.11-8284.
   
  
    [68]
Valian, V. 2015. Bilingualism and Cognition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition. 18, 1 (2015), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728914000522.
   
  
    [69]
Van Berkum, J.J.A. et al. 2008. The Neural Integration of Speaker and Message. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 20, 4 (2008), 580–591. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2008.20054.
   
  
    [70]
Vinckier, F. and Dehaene, S. 2007. Hierarchical Coding of Letter Strings in the Ventral Stream: Dissecting the Inner Organization of the Visual Word-Form System. Neuron. 55, 1 (2007), 143–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2007.05.031.
   
  
    [71]
Walker, M.P. 2006. Sleep to Remember. American Scientist. 94, 4 (2006), 326–333.
   
  
    [72]
Watkins, K.E. et al. 2002. MRI Analysis of an Inherited Speech and Language Disorder: Structural Brain Abnormalities. Brain. 125, 3 (2002), 465–478. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awf057.
   
  
    [73]
Watkins, K.E. et al. 2007. Structural and Functional Abnormalities of the Motor System in Developmental Stuttering. Brain. 131, 1 (2007), 50–59. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awm241.
   
  
    [74]
Wheat, K.L. et al. 2010. During Visual Word Recognition, Phonology Is Accessed within 100 ms and May Be Mediated by a Speech Production Code: Evidence from Magnetoencephalography. Journal of Neuroscience. 30, 15 (2010), 5229–5233.
   
  
    [75]
Winawer, J. et al. 2007. Russian Blues Reveal Effects of Language on Color Discrimination. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States. 104, 19 (2007), 7780–7785.
   
  
    [76]
Woollams, A.M. 2013. Connectionist Neuropsychology: Uncovering Ultimate Causes of Acquired Dyslexia. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 369, 1634 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0398.
   
  
    [77]
Woollams, A.M. 2014. Connectionist Neuropsychology: Uncovering Ultimate Causes of Acquired Dyslexia. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 369, 1634 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0398.
   
  
    [78]
Woollams, A.M. 2007. SD-Squared: On the Association Between Semantic Dementia and Surface Dyslexia. Psychological Review. 114, 2 (2007), 316–339.
   
  
    [79]
Woollams, A.M. and Patterson, K. 2012. The Consequences of Progressive Phonological Impairment for Reading Aloud. Neuropsychologia. 50, 14 (2012), 3469–3477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.09.020.
   
  
    [80]
Ziegler, J.C. et al. 2004. Visual Phonology: The Effects of Orthographic Consistency on Different Auditory Word Recognition Tasks. Memory & Cognition. 32, 5 (2004), 732–741. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195863.