1.
Hudson A. Equity and Trusts. Ninth edition. London: Routledge; 2017.
2.
Hudson A. Equity and Trusts [Internet]. Ninth edition. London: Routledge; 2017. Available from: https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=4595301
3.
Thomas M, editor. Blackstone’s Statutes on Property Law, 2019-2020. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2019.
4.
Virgo G, Maudsley RH, Burn EH. Maudsley and Burn’s Trusts and Trustees: Cases and Materials. 7th Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008.
5.
Clements R, Abass A. Equity and Trusts: Text, Cases, and Materials. Fifth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2018.
6.
Duddington J. Essentials of Equity and Trusts Law. Harlow: Pearson Education; 2006.
7.
Duddington J. Essentials of Equity and Trusts Law [Internet]. Harlow, England: Pearson Education; 2006. Available from: http://ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781405872461
8.
Edwards R, Stockwell N. Trusts and Equity [Internet]. Twelfth edition. Harlow: Pearson Education; 2015. Available from: http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=13404623940002671&institutionId=2671&customerId=2670
9.
Moffat G, Garton J, Bean GMD, Probert R. Moffat’s Trusts Law: Text and Materials. Sixth edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2015.
10.
Hayton DJ, Mitchell C, Marshall OR. Hayton and Marshall Commentary and Cases on the Law of Trusts and Equitable Remedies. 13th Edition. London: Sweet & Maxwell; 2015.
11.
Haley MA, McMurtry L. Equity & Trusts [Internet]. 4th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell; 2014. Available from: http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=13404454730002671&institutionId=2671&customerId=2670
12.
Haley MA, McMurtry L. Equity & Trusts [Internet]. Fourth edition. London: Sweet & Maxwell; 2014. Available from: http://ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780414031555
13.
Hudson A. Understanding Equity & Trusts. 6th Edition. London: Routledge; 2017.
14.
Pearce R. Law of Trusts and Equitable Obligations. Vol. Vol 7th Ed. Oxford University Press; 2018.
15.
Penner JE. The Law of Trusts. Eleventh edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2019.
16.
Pettit PH. Equity and the Law of Trusts. 12th ed. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press; 2012.
17.
Virgo G. The Principles of Equity & Trusts. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2018.
18.
Watt G. Equity & Trusts Law. 6th edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2019.
19.
Watt G. Cases & Materials on Equity & Trusts. Tenth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2016.
20.
Watt G. Trusts and Equity. Sixth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014.
21.
Wilson S, Todd P, Wilson S. Todd & Wilson’s Textbook on Trusts & Equity. Twelfth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015.
22.
Denning AT. Landmarks in the Law. New York: Oxford University Press; 1984.
23.
Chambers R, Mitchell C, Penner JE. Philosophical Foundations of the Law of Unjust Enrichment. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009.
24.
Chambers R. Philosophical Foundations of the Law of Unjust Enrichment [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199567751.001.1
25.
Gardner S. An Introduction to the Law of Trusts. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011.
26.
Hayton DJ, Underhill A, Matthews P, Mitchell C. Underhill and Hayton Law Relating to Trusts and Trustees. 18th ed. London: LexisNexis; 2010.
27.
Holdsworth W, Potton E. A History of English Law. London: Methuen; 1932.
28.
Hudson A. Great Debates in Equity and Trusts. London: Palgrave, an imprint of Macmillan Publishers; 2014.
29.
Snell EHT. Snell’s Equity. 33rd Edition. McGhee J, editor. London: Sweet & Maxwell; 2016.
30.
Maitland FW. Equity: A Course of Lectures. 2nd Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011.
31.
Mitchell C, Mitchell P, editors. Landmark Cases in Equity. Oxford: Hart Publishing; 2014.
32.
Mitchell C. Constructive and Resulting Trusts. Oxford: Hart; 2010.
33.
Oakley AJ. Parker and Mellows: The Modern Law of Trusts. 9th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell; 2008.
34.
Pollock F. Jurisprudence and Legal Essays. Westport, Conn: Greenwood Press; 1978.
35.
Spry ICF. Equitable Remedies. Sweet & Maxwell; 1997.
36.
Swadling W. The Quistclose Trust: Critical Essays. Oxford: Hart; 2004.
37.
Thomas GW. Thomas on Powers. 2nd Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.
38.
Thomas GW, Hudson A. The Law of Trusts. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010.
39.
Worthington S. Equity. 2nd ed. Vol. Clarendon law series. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006.
40.
The Cambridge Law Journal. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/journal/camblawj
41.
The Modern Law Review. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/journal/modernlawreview
42.
Edinburgh Law Review. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fedinlr&collection=journals
43.
Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/journal/oxfojlegastud
44.
Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rouc20
45.
The University of Toronto Law Journal. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/journal/univtorolawj
46.
Stanford Law Review. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/journal/stanlawrevi
47.
Lloyd’s Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly. Available from: https://www.i-law.com/ilaw/browse_journals.htm?name=Lloyd%27s%20Maritime%20and%20Commercial%20Law%20Quarterly
48.
The Conveyancer and Property Lawyer. Available from: https://librarysearch.royalholloway.ac.uk/permalink/44ROY_INST/16u3s8/alma996996922902671
49.
Law Quarterly Review. Available from: https://librarysearch.royalholloway.ac.uk/permalink/44ROY_INST/16u3s8/alma997001898402671
50.
The Yale Law Journal. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/journal/yalelawj
51.
California Law Review. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/journal/calilawrevi
52.
Virginia Law Review. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/journal/virglawrevi
53.
Hastings Law Journal. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fhastlj&collection=journals
54.
Current Legal Problems. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/clp
55.
Harvard Law Review. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/journal/harvardlawreview
56.
Singapore Journal of Legal Studies. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/journal/singjlegastud
57.
Legislation.gov.uk [Internet]. Available from: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/
58.
UK Parliament [Internet]. Available from: http://www.parliament.uk/
59.
British and Irish Legal Information Institute [Internet]. Available from: http://www.bailii.org/
60.
European Court of Human Rights [Internet]. Available from: http://www.echr.coe.int/Pages/home.aspx?p=home
61.
BBC - Home [Internet]. Available from: https://www.bbc.co.uk/
62.
The Times & The Sunday Times [Internet]. Available from: https://www.thetimes.co.uk/
63.
The Guardian [Internet]. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/uk
64.
Hudson A. Equity and Trusts. Ninth edition. London: Routledge; 2017.
65.
Hudson A. Equity and Trusts [Internet]. Ninth edition. London: Routledge; 2017. Available from: https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=4595301
66.
Duggan AJ. Is Equity Efficient? Law Quarterly Review [Internet]. 1997;113(4):601–36. Available from: https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/ICCDA5A50E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html
67.
Hayton D. The Development of Equity and the ‘Good Person’ Philosophy in Common Law Systems. Conveyancer and Property Lawyer [Internet]. 2012; Available from: https://librarysearch.royalholloway.ac.uk:443/44ROY_VU2:LSCOP_44ROY_ARTICLES:TN_gale_legal314272561
68.
Macnair M. Equity and Conscience. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies [Internet]. 2007;27(4):659–81. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20185349
69.
COWCHER v. COWCHER [Internet]. Vol. 1, Weekly Law Reports (ICLR). 1972. Available from: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=5FJH-TCT1-F00Y-N48H&csi=417192&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
70.
Anderson S. The Proper Narrow Scope of Equitable Conversion in Land Law. Law Quarterly Review. 1984;100:86–102.
71.
Buckley RA. Social Security Fraud as Illegality. Law Quarterly Review [Internet]. 1994; Available from: https://librarysearch.royalholloway.ac.uk:443/44ROY_VU2:LSCOP_44ROY_ARTICLES:TN_gale_legal14929374
72.
Delany VTH. Equity and the Law Reform Committee. The Modern Law Review [Internet]. 1961;24(1):116–22. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1093042?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
73.
Gardner S. Two Maxims of Equity. The Cambridge Law Journal [Internet]. 1995;54(1):60–8. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4508035
74.
Pettit PH. He Who Comes Into Equity Must Come With Clean Hands. Conveyancer and Property Lawyer [Internet]. 1990;(Nov/Dec):416–26. Available from: https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IA7933370E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html
75.
Hudson A. Equity and Trusts. Ninth edition. London: Routledge; 2017.
76.
Hudson A. Equity and Trusts [Internet]. Ninth edition. London: Routledge; 2017. Available from: https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=4595301
77.
Critchley P. Instruments of Fraud, Testamentary Dispositions, and the Doctrine of Secret Trusts. Law Quarterly Review [Internet]. 1999;115(October):631–54. Available from: https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I78ED62E0E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A/View/FullText.html
78.
Meager R. Secret Trusts - Do They Have a Future? Conveyancer and Property Lawyer [Internet]. 2003;(May/June):203–14. Available from: https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IA73A6510E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html
79.
Hodge D. Secret Trusts: The Fraud Theory Revisited. Conveyancer and Property Lawyer. 1980;44(Sept/Oct):341–50.
80.
Matthews P. The True Basis of the Half – Secret Trust. Conveyancer and Property Lawyer. 1979;360–70.
81.
Perrins B. Can You Keep Half a Secret? Law Quarterly Review. 1972;88:225–38.
82.
Kincaid D. The Tangled Web: The Relationship Between a Secret Trust and the Will. Conveyancer and Property Lawyer [Internet]. 2000;(Sept/Oct):420–43. Available from: https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IA74C8D80E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html
83.
Watkin TG. Cloaking a Contravention. Conveyancer and Property Lawyer. 1981;335–42.
84.
Hudson A. Equity and Trusts. Ninth edition. London: Routledge; 2017.
85.
Hudson A. Equity and Trusts [Internet]. Ninth edition. London: Routledge; 2017. Available from: https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=4595301
86.
Hayton D. Uncertainty of Subject-Matter of Trusts. Law Quarterly Review [Internet]. 1994;110(July):335–40. Available from: https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/ICD03DB50E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html
87.
Matthews P. A Heresy and a Half in Certainty of Objects. Conveyancer and Property Lawyer. 1984;202:22–31.
88.
Emery C. The Most Hallowed - Certainty of Beneficiaries of Trusts and Powers of Appointment. Law Quarterly Review. 1982;98:551–86.
89.
Grubb A. Powers, Trusts and Classes of Objects. Conveyancer and Property Lawyer. 1982;46(1):432–41.
90.
Hopkins J. Certain Uncertainties of Trusts and Powers. The Cambridge Law Journal [Internet]. 1971;29(1):68–102. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4505439
91.
McKay L. Re Baden and the Third Class of Uncertainty. Conveyance and Property Lawyer. 1974;38(3):269–84.
92.
Hudson A. Equity and Trusts. Ninth edition. London: Routledge; 2017.
93.
Hudson A. Equity and Trusts [Internet]. Ninth edition. London: Routledge; 2017. Available from: https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=4595301
94.
Battersby G. Formalities for the Disposition of Equitable Interests Under a Trust. Conveyancer and Property Lawyer. 1979;43:17–38.
95.
Conaglen M. Sham Trusts. The Cambridge Law Journal [Internet]. 2008;67(1):176–207. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25166381
96.
Rochefoucauld v. Boustead. [1894 R. 1864.] [Internet]. Vol. 1, ICLR: Chancery Division. 1897. Available from: https://plus.lexis.com/api/document/collection/uk/id/4JWD.4410.TXD6.Y0RB.00000.00
97.
Green B. Grey, Oughtred and Vandervell. a Contextual Reappraisal. The Modern Law Review [Internet]. 1984;47(4):385–421. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1095817
98.
Hodge D. Secret Trusts: The Fraud Theory Revisited. Conveyancer and Property Lawyer. 1980;44(Sept/Oct):341–50.
99.
Matthews P. The True Basis of the Half – Secret Trust. Conveyancer and Property Lawyer. 1979;360–70.
100.
Perrins B. Secret Trusts: The Key to the Dehors. CPL. 1985;
101.
Sheridan L. English and Irish Secret Trusts. Law Quarterly Review. 1951;67.
102.
Hudson A. Equity and Trusts. Ninth edition. London: Routledge; 2017.
103.
Hudson A. Equity and Trusts [Internet]. Ninth edition. London: Routledge; 2017. Available from: https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=4595301
104.
Garton J. The Role of the Trust Mechanism in the Rule in Re Rose. Conveyancer and Property Lawyer [Internet]. 2003;(Sep/Oct):364–79. Available from: https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IA73B9D90E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html
105.
Halliwell M. Perfecting Imperfect Gifts and Trusts: Have We Reached the End of the Chancellor’s Foot? Conveyancer and Property Lawyer [Internet]. 2003;(May/Jun):192–202. Available from: https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IA73953A0E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html
106.
JONES v. LOCK. [Internet]. Vol. 1. Available from: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4JKG-Y3R0-TXD7-31FY&csi=296987&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
107.
RICHARDS v. DELBRIDGE. [Internet]. Vol. 18. Available from: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4JKH-VWW0-TXD6-J0YF&csi=296978&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
108.
Hornby J. Covenants in Favour of Volunteers. Law Quarterly Review. 1962;
109.
Luxton P. In Search of Perfection: The Re Rose Rule Rationale. Conveyancer and Property Lawyer [Internet]. 2012;(1):70–5. Available from: https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/ID134E9B050A411E18A8AA01CC7CE21D9/View/FullText.html
110.
Macnair MRT. Equity and Volunteers. Legal Studies. 1988;8(2):172–200.
111.
Rickett C. Completely Constituting an Inter Vivos Trust: Property Rules? Conveyancer and Property Lawyer [Internet]. 2001;(Nov/Dec):515–21. Available from: https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IA74317A1E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html
112.
Roberts N. Donationes Mortis Causa in a Dematerialised World. The Conveyancer and Property Lawyer [Internet]. 2013;(2):113–28. Available from: https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IE22491D0A31E11E28E17C4EDF535ADDD/View/FullText.html
113.
Hudson A. Equity and Trusts. Ninth edition. London: Routledge; 2017.
114.
Hudson A. Equity and Trusts [Internet]. Ninth edition. London: Routledge; 2017. Available from: https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=4595301
115.
Baughen S. Performing Animals and the Dissolution of Unincorporated Associations: The ‘Contract-Holding Theory’ Vindicated. Conveyancer and Property Lawyer [Internet]. 2010;(3):216–33. Available from: https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I949C90B07A8211DF8580D187BA0B814B/View/FullText.html
116.
Brown J. What Are We to Do With Testamentary Trusts of Imperfect Obligation? Conveyancer and Property Lawyer [Internet]. 2007;(Mar/Apr):148–60. Available from: https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I25ABF9C0E30911DB9628FD37664FF158/View/FullText.html
117.
In Re Denley’s Trust Deed Holman and Others v. H. H. Martyn & Co. Ltd. and Others [1967 D. No. 146] [Internet]. Vol. 1, ICLR: Chancery Division. 1969. Available from: https://plus.lexis.com/api/document/collection/uk/id/4JT8.6D20.TXD6.Y07S.00000.00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=3W6DSS57683
118.
Gravells NP. Public Purpose Trusts. The Modern Law Review [Internet]. 1977;40(4):397–419. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1095656?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
119.
Luxton P. Gifts to Clubs: Contract-Holding Is Trumps. Conveyancer and Property Lawyer [Internet]. 2007;(May/June):274–81. Available from: https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IDBF32580109C11DCA383E352BC1B5B22/View/FullText.html
120.
Matthews P. From Obligation to Property, and Back Again? In: Extending the boundaries of trusts and similar ring-fenced funds. The Hague: Kluwer Law International; 2002.
121.
Hudson A. Equity and Trusts. Ninth edition. London: Routledge; 2017.
122.
Hudson A. Equity and Trusts [Internet]. Ninth edition. London: Routledge; 2017. Available from: https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=4595301
123.
Garton J. Trustee Act 2000. Trust Law International. 2001;15:34–40.
124.
Thornton R. Ethical Investments: A Case of Disjointed Thinking. The Cambridge Law Journal [Internet]. 2008;67(2):396–422. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25166411
125.
Nestle v National Westminster Bank plc [Internet]. Vol. 1, All England Law Reports. 1994. Available from: https://plus.lexis.com/api/document/collection/uk/id/4CSP.4J80.TWP1.60W1.00000.00
126.
Langbein JH. Questioning the Trust Law Duty of Loyalty: Sole Interest or Best Interest? The Yale Law Journal [Internet]. 2005;114(5):929–90. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4135698
127.
Luxton P. Ethical Investment in Hard Times. The Modern Law Review [Internet]. 1992;55(4):587–93. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1096660
128.
Nobles RL. Charities and Ethical Investment. Conveyancer and Property Lawyer [Internet]. 1992;(Mar/Apr):115–8. Available from: https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IA781CE50E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html
129.
Parry N. Remuneration of Trustees. Conveyancer and Property Lawyer. 1984;
130.
Hudson A. Equity and Trusts. Ninth edition. London: Routledge; 2017.
131.
Hudson A. Equity and Trusts [Internet]. Ninth edition. London: Routledge; 2017. Available from: https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=4595301
132.
Birks P. The Content of Fiduciary Obligations. Trusts Law International. 2002;16:34–52.
133.
Conaglen M. The Nature and Function of Fiduciary Loyalty. Law Quarterly Review [Internet]. 2005;121(July):452–80. Available from: https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/ICC90A720E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html
134.
Boardman and Another Appellants and Phipps Respondent [On Appeal From Phipps v Boardman] [Internet]. Vol. 2, ICLR: Appeal Cases. 1967. Available from: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4K4W-PD40-TXD8-60HJ&csi=296986&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
135.
Ho L. Attributing Losses to a Breach of Fiduciary Duty. Trusts Law International. 1998;12.
136.
Jones G. Unjust Enrichment and the Fiduciary’s Duty of Loyalty. Law Quarterly Review. 1968;84:472–502.
137.
Miller P. Justifying Fiduciary Duties. McGill Law Journal [Internet]. 2013;58(4):969–1023. Available from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=90619994&site=ehost-live
138.
Smith L. Fiduciary Relationships: Ensuring the Loyal Exercise of Judgement on Behalf of Another. The Law Quarterly Review [Internet]. 2014; Available from: https://librarysearch.royalholloway.ac.uk/permalink/44ROY_INST/93uiap/cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1692000416
139.
Hudson A. Equity and Trusts. Ninth edition. London: Routledge; 2017.
140.
Hudson A. Equity and Trusts [Internet]. Ninth edition. London: Routledge; 2017. Available from: https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=4595301
141.
Evans S. Variation Clarification. Conveyancer and Property Lawyer [Internet]. 2011;(2):151–6. Available from: https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IFE869F005E6811E090EA89A3987631E1/View/FullText.html
142.
Luxton P. Variation of Trusts: Settlors’ Intentions and the Consent Principle in Saunders v Vautier. The Modern Law Review [Internet]. 1997;60(5):719–26. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1096961?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
143.
Saunders v Vautier (1841) 4 Beav 115 [Internet]. Available from: https://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FXV-BWY0-TWW4-211S&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
144.
Harris J. Ten Years of Variation of Trusts. Conveyancer and Property Lawyer. 1969;33:113–34.
145.
Hayes M. Breaking and Varying Trusts Painlessly. Trusts & Trustees. 1998;4(4):17–20.
146.
Mowbray M. Varying Trusts. Conveyancer and Property Lawyer. 1958;
147.
Riddall JG. Does It or Doesn’t It? - Contingent Interests and the Variation of Trusts Act 1958. Conveyancer and Property Lawyer [Internet]. 1987;(March-April):144–7. Available from: https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IA7BC3F40E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html
