Anderson, S. ‘The Proper Narrow Scope of Equitable Conversion in Land Law’. Law Quarterly Review 100 (1984): 86–102. Print.
Battersby, G. ‘Formalities for the Disposition of Equitable Interests Under a Trust’. Conveyancer and Property Lawyer 43 (1979): 17–38. Print.
Baughen, Simon. ‘Performing Animals and the Dissolution of Unincorporated Associations: The “Contract-Holding Theory” Vindicated’. Conveyancer and Property Lawyer 3 (2010): 216–233. Web. <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I949C90B07A8211DF8580D187BA0B814B/View/FullText.html>.
‘BBC - Home’. N.p., n.d. Web. <https://www.bbc.co.uk/>.
Birks, Peter. ‘The Content of Fiduciary Obligations’. Trusts Law International 16 (2002): 34–52. Print.
Boardman and Another Appellants and Phipps Respondent [On Appeal From Phipps v Boardman]. Vol. 2. N.p., 1967. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4K4W-PD40-TXD8-60HJ&csi=296986&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.
‘British and Irish Legal Information Institute’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://www.bailii.org/>.
Brown, James. ‘What Are We to Do With Testamentary Trusts of Imperfect Obligation?’ Conveyancer and Property Lawyer Mar/Apr (2007): 148–160. Web. <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I25ABF9C0E30911DB9628FD37664FF158/View/FullText.html>.
Buckley, R.A. ‘Social Security Fraud as Illegality’. Law Quarterly Review (1994): n. pag. Web. <https://librarysearch.royalholloway.ac.uk:443/44ROY_VU2:LSCOP_44ROY_ARTICLES:TN_gale_legal14929374>.
‘California Law Review’. n. pag. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/journal/calilawrevi>.
Chambers, Robert. Philosophical Foundations of the Law of Unjust Enrichment. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. Web. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199567751.001.1>.
Chambers, Robert, Charles Mitchell, and J. E. Penner. Philosophical Foundations of the Law of Unjust Enrichment. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. Print.
Clements, Richard, and Ademola Abass. Equity and Trusts: Text, Cases, and Materials. Fifth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. Print.
Conaglen, Matthew. ‘Sham Trusts’. The Cambridge Law Journal 67.1 (2008): 176–207. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/25166381>.
---. ‘The Nature and Function of Fiduciary Loyalty’. Law Quarterly Review 121.July (2005): 452–480. Web. <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/ICC90A720E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html>.
COWCHER v. COWCHER. Vol. 1. N.p., 1972. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=5FJH-TCT1-F00Y-N48H&csi=417192&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.
Critchley, Patricia. ‘Instruments of Fraud, Testamentary Dispositions, and the Doctrine of Secret Trusts’. Law Quarterly Review 115.October (1999): 631–654. Web. <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I78ED62E0E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A/View/FullText.html>.
‘Current Legal Problems’. n. pag. Web. <https://academic.oup.com/clp>.
Delany, V. T. H. ‘Equity and the Law Reform Committee’. The Modern Law Review 24.1 (1961): 116–122. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/1093042?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>.
Denning, Alfred Thompson. Landmarks in the Law. New York: Oxford University Press, 1984. Print.
Duddington, John. Essentials of Equity and Trusts Law. Harlow: Pearson Education, 2006. Print.
---. Essentials of Equity and Trusts Law. Harlow, England: Pearson Education, 2006. Web. <http://ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781405872461>.
Duggan, Anthony J. ‘Is Equity Efficient?’ Law Quarterly Review 113.4 (1997): 601–636. Web. <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/ICCDA5A50E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html>.
‘Edinburgh Law Review’. n. pag. Web. <http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fedinlr&collection=journals>.
Edwards, Richard, and Nigel Stockwell. Trusts and Equity. Twelfth edition. Harlow: Pearson Education, 2015. Web. <http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=13404623940002671&institutionId=2671&customerId=2670>.
Emery, C. ‘The Most Hallowed - Certainty of Beneficiaries of Trusts and Powers of Appointment.’ Law Quarterly Review 98 (1982): 551–586. Print.
‘European Court of Human Rights’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://www.echr.coe.int/Pages/home.aspx?p=home>.
Evans, Steve. ‘Variation Clarification’. Conveyancer and Property Lawyer 2 (2011): 151–156. Web. <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IFE869F005E6811E090EA89A3987631E1/View/FullText.html>.
Gardner, Simon. An Introduction to the Law of Trusts. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011. Print.
---. ‘Two Maxims of Equity’. The Cambridge Law Journal 54.1 (1995): 60–68. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/4508035>.
Garton, J. ‘Trustee Act 2000’. Trust Law International 15 (2001): 34–40. Print.
Garton, Jonathan. ‘The Role of the Trust Mechanism in the Rule in Re Rose’. Conveyancer and Property Lawyer Sep/Oct (2003): 364–379. Web. <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IA73B9D90E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html>.
Gravells, Nigel P. ‘Public Purpose Trusts’. The Modern Law Review 40.4 (1977): 397–419. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/1095656?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>.
Green, Brian. ‘Grey, Oughtred and Vandervell. a Contextual Reappraisal’. The Modern Law Review 47.4 (1984): 385–421. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/1095817>.
Grubb, Andrew. ‘Powers, Trusts and Classes of Objects’. Conveyancer and Property Lawyer 46.1 (1982): 432–441. Print.
Haley, Michael A., and Lara McMurtry. Equity & Trusts. 4th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2014. Web. <http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=13404454730002671&institutionId=2671&customerId=2670>.
---. Equity & Trusts. Fourth edition. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2014. Web. <http://ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780414031555>.
Halliwell, Margaret. ‘Perfecting Imperfect Gifts and Trusts: Have We Reached the End of the Chancellor’s Foot?’ Conveyancer and Property Lawyer May/Jun (2003): 192–202. Web. <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IA73953A0E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html>.
Harris, J. ‘Ten Years of Variation of Trusts’. Conveyancer and Property Lawyer 33 (1969): 113–134. Print.
‘Harvard Law Review’. n. pag. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/journal/harvardlawreview>.
‘Hastings Law Journal’. n. pag. Web. <http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fhastlj&collection=journals>.
Hayes, M. ‘Breaking and Varying Trusts Painlessly’. Trusts & Trustees 4.4 (1998): 17–20. Web.
Hayton, David. ‘The Development of Equity and the “Good Person” Philosophy in Common Law Systems’. Conveyancer and Property Lawyer (2012): n. pag. Web. <https://librarysearch.royalholloway.ac.uk:443/44ROY_VU2:LSCOP_44ROY_ARTICLES:TN_gale_legal314272561>.
---. ‘Uncertainty of Subject-Matter of Trusts’. Law Quarterly Review 110.July (1994): 335–340. Web. <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/ICD03DB50E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html>.
Hayton, David J. et al. Underhill and Hayton Law Relating to Trusts and Trustees. 18th ed. London: LexisNexis, 2010. Print.
Hayton, David J., Charles Mitchell, and Oshley Roy Marshall. Hayton and Marshall Commentary and Cases on the Law of Trusts and Equitable Remedies. 13th Edition. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2015. Print.
Ho, L. ‘Attributing Losses to a Breach of Fiduciary Duty’. Trusts Law International 12 (1998): n. pag. Print.
Hodge, David. ‘Secret Trusts: The Fraud Theory Revisited’. Conveyancer and Property Lawyer 44.Sept/Oct (1980): 341–350. Print.
---. ‘Secret Trusts: The Fraud Theory Revisited’. Conveyancer and Property Lawyer 44.Sept/Oct (1980): 341–350. Print.
Holdsworth, William, and Edward Potton. A History of English Law. London: Methuen, 1932. Print.
Hopkins, John. ‘Certain Uncertainties of Trusts and Powers’. The Cambridge Law Journal 29.1 (1971): 68–102. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/4505439>.
Hornby, J. ‘Covenants in Favour of Volunteers’. Law Quarterly Review (1962): n. pag. Print.
Hudson, Alastair. Equity and Trusts. Ninth edition. London: Routledge, 2017. Print.
---. Equity and Trusts. Ninth edition. London: Routledge, 2017. Web. <https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=4595301>.
---. Equity and Trusts. Ninth edition. London: Routledge, 2017. Print.
---. Equity and Trusts. Ninth edition. London: Routledge, 2017. Web. <https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=4595301>.
---. Equity and Trusts. Ninth edition. London: Routledge, 2017. Print.
---. Equity and Trusts. Ninth edition. London: Routledge, 2017. Web. <https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=4595301>.
---. Equity and Trusts. Ninth edition. London: Routledge, 2017. Print.
---. Equity and Trusts. Ninth edition. London: Routledge, 2017. Web. <https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=4595301>.
---. Equity and Trusts. Ninth edition. London: Routledge, 2017. Print.
---. Equity and Trusts. Ninth edition. London: Routledge, 2017. Web. <https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=4595301>.
---. Equity and Trusts. Ninth edition. London: Routledge, 2017. Print.
---. Equity and Trusts. Ninth edition. London: Routledge, 2017. Web. <https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=4595301>.
---. Equity and Trusts. Ninth edition. London: Routledge, 2017. Print.
---. Equity and Trusts. Ninth edition. London: Routledge, 2017. Web. <https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=4595301>.
---. Equity and Trusts. Ninth edition. London: Routledge, 2017. Print.
---. Equity and Trusts. Ninth edition. London: Routledge, 2017. Web. <https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=4595301>.
---. Equity and Trusts. Ninth edition. London: Routledge, 2017. Print.
---. Equity and Trusts. Ninth edition. London: Routledge, 2017. Web. <https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=4595301>.
---. Equity and Trusts. Ninth edition. London: Routledge, 2017. Print.
---. Equity and Trusts. Ninth edition. London: Routledge, 2017. Web. <https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=4595301>.
---. Great Debates in Equity and Trusts. London: Palgrave, an imprint of Macmillan Publishers, 2014. Print.
---. Understanding Equity & Trusts. 6th Edition. London: Routledge, 2017. Print.
In Re Denley’s Trust Deed Holman and Others v. H. H. Martyn & Co. Ltd. and Others [1967 D. No. 146]. Vol. 1. N.p., 1969. Web. <https://plus.lexis.com/api/document/collection/uk/id/4JT8.6D20.TXD6.Y07S.00000.00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=3W6DSS57683>.
Jones, G. ‘Unjust Enrichment and the Fiduciary’s Duty of Loyalty’. Law Quarterly Review 84 (1968): 472–502. Print.
JONES v. LOCK. Vol. 1. N.p. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4JKG-Y3R0-TXD7-31FY&csi=296987&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.
Kincaid, Diana. ‘The Tangled Web: The Relationship Between a Secret Trust and the Will’. Conveyancer and Property Lawyer Sept/Oct (2000): 420–443. Web. <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IA74C8D80E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html>.
Langbein, John H. ‘Questioning the Trust Law Duty of Loyalty: Sole Interest or Best Interest?’ The Yale Law Journal 114.5 (2005): 929–990. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/4135698>.
‘Law Quarterly Review’. n. pag. Web. <https://librarysearch.royalholloway.ac.uk/permalink/44ROY_INST/16u3s8/alma997001898402671>.
‘Legislation.Gov.Uk’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://www.legislation.gov.uk/>.
‘Lloyd’s Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly’. n. pag. Web. <https://www.i-law.com/ilaw/browse_journals.htm?name=Lloyd%27s%20Maritime%20and%20Commercial%20Law%20Quarterly>.
Luxton, Peter. ‘Ethical Investment in Hard Times’. The Modern Law Review 55.4 (1992): 587–593. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/1096660>.
---. ‘Gifts to Clubs: Contract-Holding Is Trumps’. Conveyancer and Property Lawyer May/June (2007): 274–281. Web. <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IDBF32580109C11DCA383E352BC1B5B22/View/FullText.html>.
---. ‘In Search of Perfection: The Re Rose Rule Rationale’. Conveyancer and Property Lawyer 1 (2012): 70–75. Web. <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/ID134E9B050A411E18A8AA01CC7CE21D9/View/FullText.html>.
---. ‘Variation of Trusts: Settlors’ Intentions and the Consent Principle in Saunders v Vautier’. The Modern Law Review 60.5 (1997): 719–726. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/1096961?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>.
Macnair, M. R. T. ‘Equity and Volunteers’. Legal Studies 8.2 (1988): 172–200. Web.
Macnair, Mike. ‘Equity and Conscience’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 27.4 (2007): 659–681. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/20185349>.
Maitland, Frederic William. Equity: A Course of Lectures. 2nd Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011. Print.
Matthews, P. ‘A Heresy and a Half in Certainty of Objects’. Conveyancer and Property Lawyer 202 (1984): 22–31. Print.
Matthews, P. ‘From Obligation to Property, and Back Again?’ Extending the Boundaries of Trusts and Similar Ring-Fenced Funds. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2002. Print.
Matthews, Paul. ‘The True Basis of the Half – Secret Trust’. Conveyancer and Property Lawyer (1979): 360–370. Print.
---. ‘The True Basis of the Half – Secret Trust’. Conveyancer and Property Lawyer (1979): 360–370. Print.
McKay, L. ‘Re Baden and the Third Class of Uncertainty’. Conveyance and Property Lawyer 38.3 (1974): 269–284. Print.
Meager, Rowena. ‘Secret Trusts - Do They Have a Future?’ Conveyancer and Property Lawyer May/June (2003): 203–214. Web. <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IA73A6510E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html>.
Miller, Paul. ‘Justifying Fiduciary Duties’. McGill Law Journal 58.4 (2013): 969–1023. Web. <http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=90619994&site=ehost-live>.
Mitchell, Charles. Constructive and Resulting Trusts. Oxford: Hart, 2010. Print.
Mitchell, Charles, and Paul Mitchell, eds. Landmark Cases in Equity. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2014. Print.
Moffat, Graham et al. Moffat’s Trusts Law: Text and Materials. Sixth edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015. Print.
Mowbray, M. ‘Varying Trusts’. Conveyancer and Property Lawyer (1958): n. pag. Print.
Nestle v National Westminster Bank Plc. Vol. 1. N.p., 1994. Web. <https://plus.lexis.com/api/document/collection/uk/id/4CSP.4J80.TWP1.60W1.00000.00>.
Nobles, Richard L. ‘Charities and Ethical Investment’. Conveyancer and Property Lawyer Mar/Apr (1992): 115–118. Web. <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IA781CE50E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html>.
Oakley, A. J. Parker and Mellows: The Modern Law of Trusts. 9th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2008. Print.
‘Oxford Journal of Legal Studies’. n. pag. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/journal/oxfojlegastud>.
‘Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal’. n. pag. Web. <http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rouc20>.
Parry, N. ‘Remuneration of Trustees’. Conveyancer and Property Lawyer (1984): n. pag. Print.
Pearce, R. Law of Trusts and Equitable Obligations. Vol 7th Ed. Oxford University Press, 2018. Print.
Penner, J. E. The Law of Trusts. Eleventh edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019. Print.
Perrins, B. ‘Can You Keep Half a Secret?’ Law Quarterly Review 88 (1972): 225–238. Print.
---. ‘Secret Trusts: The Key to the Dehors’. CPL (1985): n. pag. Print.
Pettit, Philip H. ‘He Who Comes Into Equity Must Come With Clean Hands’. Conveyancer and Property Lawyer Nov/Dec (1990): 416–426. Web. <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IA7933370E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html>.
Pettit, Philip Henry. Equity and the Law of Trusts. 12th ed. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press, 2012. Print.
Pollock, Frederick. Jurisprudence and Legal Essays. Westport, Conn: Greenwood Press, 1978. Print.
RICHARDS v. DELBRIDGE. Vol. 18. N.p. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4JKH-VWW0-TXD6-J0YF&csi=296978&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.
Rickett, Charles. ‘Completely Constituting an Inter Vivos Trust: Property Rules?’ Conveyancer and Property Lawyer Nov/Dec (2001): 515–521. Web. <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IA74317A1E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html>.
Riddall, J.G. ‘Does It or Doesn’t It? - Contingent Interests and the Variation of Trusts Act 1958’. Conveyancer and Property Lawyer March-April (1987): 144–147. Web. <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IA7BC3F40E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html>.
Roberts, Nicholas. ‘Donationes Mortis Causa in a Dematerialised World’. The Conveyancer and Property Lawyer 2 (2013): 113–128. Web. <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IE22491D0A31E11E28E17C4EDF535ADDD/View/FullText.html>.
Rochefoucauld v. Boustead. [1894 R. 1864.]. Vol. 1. N.p., 1897. Web. <https://plus.lexis.com/api/document/collection/uk/id/4JWD.4410.TXD6.Y0RB.00000.00>.
Saunders v Vautier (1841) 4 Beav 115. N.p. Web. <https://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FXV-BWY0-TWW4-211S&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.
Sheridan, L. ‘English and Irish Secret Trusts’. Law Quarterly Review 67 (1951): n. pag. Print.
‘Singapore Journal of Legal Studies’. n. pag. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/journal/singjlegastud>.
Smith, Lionel. ‘Fiduciary Relationships: Ensuring the Loyal Exercise of Judgement on Behalf of Another’. The Law Quarterly Review (2014): n. pag. Web. <https://librarysearch.royalholloway.ac.uk/permalink/44ROY_INST/93uiap/cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1692000416>.
Snell, Edmund Henry Turner. Snell’s Equity. Ed. John McGhee. 33rd Edition. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2016. Print.
Spry, I.C.F. Equitable Remedies. Sweet & Maxwell, 1997. Print.
‘Stanford Law Review’. n. pag. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/journal/stanlawrevi>.
Swadling, William. The Quistclose Trust: Critical Essays. Oxford: Hart, 2004. Print.
‘The Cambridge Law Journal’. n. pag. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/journal/camblawj>.
‘The Conveyancer and Property Lawyer’. n. pag. Web. <https://librarysearch.royalholloway.ac.uk/permalink/44ROY_INST/16u3s8/alma996996922902671>.
‘The Guardian’. N.p., n.d. Web. <https://www.theguardian.com/uk>.
‘The Modern Law Review’. n. pag. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/journal/modernlawreview>.
‘The Times & The Sunday Times’. N.p., n.d. Web. <https://www.thetimes.co.uk/>.
‘The University of Toronto Law Journal’. n. pag. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/journal/univtorolawj>.
‘The Yale Law Journal’. n. pag. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/journal/yalelawj>.
Thomas, Geraint W. Thomas on Powers. 2nd Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. Print.
Thomas, Geraint W., and Alastair Hudson. The Law of Trusts. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. Print.
Thomas, Meryl, ed. Blackstone’s Statutes on Property Law, 2019-2020. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019. Print.
Thornton, Rosy. ‘Ethical Investments: A Case of Disjointed Thinking’. The Cambridge Law Journal 67.2 (2008): 396–422. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/25166411>.
‘UK Parliament’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://www.parliament.uk/>.
‘Virginia Law Review’. n. pag. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/journal/virglawrevi>.
Virgo, Graham. The Principles of Equity & Trusts. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. Print.
Virgo, Graham, Ronald Harling Maudsley, and E. H. Burn. Maudsley and Burn’s Trusts and Trustees: Cases and Materials. 7th Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. Print.
Watkin, T.G. ‘Cloaking a Contravention’. Conveyancer and Property Lawyer (1981): 335–342. Print.
Watt, Gary. Cases & Materials on Equity & Trusts. Tenth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016. Print.
---. Equity & Trusts Law. 6th edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019. Print.
---. Trusts and Equity. Sixth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014. Print.
Wilson, Sarah, Paul Todd, and Sarah Wilson. Todd & Wilson’s Textbook on Trusts & Equity. Twelfth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015. Print.
Worthington, Sarah. Equity. 2nd ed. Clarendon law series. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006. Print.
