1.
Canclini G. Theatre and Performance in the Age of Global Communications, 1950-Present. Theatre Histories: An Introduction. London: Routledge; 2006. p. 409–424.
2.
Canckini G. Theatre and Performance in the Age of Global Communications, 1950-Present. Theatre Histories: An Introduction [Internet]. New York: Routledge; 2010. p. 409–424. Available from: http://ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780203879177
3.
Williams GJ. Interculturalism, Hybridity, Tourism: The Performing World on New Terms. Theatre Histories: An Introduction. London: Routledge; 2006. p. 485–519.
4.
Williams GJ. Interculturalism, Hybridity, Tourism: The Performing World on New Terms. Theatre Histories: An Introduction [Internet]. New York: Routledge; 2010. p. 485–519. Available from: http://ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780203879177
5.
Carlson M. Peter Brook’s The Mahabharata and Ariane Mnouchkine’s L’Indiade as Examples of Contemporary Cross-Cultural Theatre. The Dramatic Touch of Difference: Theatre, Own and Foreign [Internet]. Tübingen: Narr; 1990. p. 49–56. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=98f7675d-83cc-e811-80cd-005056af4099
6.
Murray S, Keefe J. Bodies and Cultures. Physical Theatres: A Critical Introduction. New York: Routledge; 2007. p. 185–203.
7.
Murray S, Keefe J. Bodies and Cultures. Physical Theatres: A Critical Introduction [Internet]. London: Routledge; 2007. p. 185–203. Available from: http://ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780203012826
8.
Pavis P. Culture and Mise en Scene. Theatre at the Crossroads of Culture. London: Routledge; 1992. p. 1–23.
9.
Pavis P. Culture and Mise en Scene. Theatre at the Crossroads of Culture [Internet]. London: Routledge; 1992. p. 1–23. Available from: http://ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780203359334
10.
Barba E. The Dilated Body. In: Fowler R, editor. The Dilated Body, Followed by the Gospel According to Oxyrhincus. Rome: Zeami Libri; 1985. p. 11–32.
11.
Lo J, Gilbert H. Toward a Topography of Cross-Cultural Theatre Praxis. TDR/The Drama Review. 2002;46(3):31–53.
12.
Nascimento CT. Tenuous Boundaries: Intra- and Intercultural Embodiments. Crossing Cultural Borders Through the Actor’s Work: Foreign Bodies of Knowledge. New York, NY: Routledge; 2009. p. 53–76.
13.
Nascimento CT. Tenuous Boundaries: Intra- and Intercultural Embodiments. Crossing Cultural Borders Through the Actor’s Work: Foreign Bodies of Knowledge [Internet]. London: Routledge; 2009. p. 53–76. Available from: http://ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780203891957
14.
Thorpe A. Lines of Flight: Intersubjective Training Across Intercultures as the Basis for a Comparison Between Japanese Nô and Chinese Jingju (‘Beijing Opera’). Theatre, Dance and Performance Training. 2018;9(1):81–98.
15.
Appadurai A. Disjuncture and Difference in the Global Cultural Economy. Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 1996.
16.
Appadurai A. Disjuncture and Difference in the Global Cultural Economy. Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization [Internet]. Minneapolis, Minn: University of Minnesota Press; 1996. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.06472
17.
Graham-Jones J. Editorial Comment: Theorizing Globalization Through Theatre. Theatre Journal. 2005;57(3):viii–xvi.
18.
Lonergan P. Theatre and Globalization: Irish Drama in the Celtic Tiger Era. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2009.
19.
Rebellato D, Ravenhill M. Theatre & Globalization. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2009.
20.
Drain R. Part V: The Global Dimension. Twentieth-Century Theatre: A Sourcebook. London: Routledge; 1995.
21.
Fischer-Lichte E, Riley J, Gissenwehrer M. The Dramatic Touch of Difference: Theatre, Own and Foreign. Tübingen: Narr; 1990.
22.
Fischer-Lichte E, Jost T, Jain SI, editors. The Politics of Interweaving Performance Cultures: Beyond Postcolonialism. New York: Routledge; 2014.
23.
Fischer-Lichte E, Jost T, Jain SI, editors. The Politics of Interweaving Performance Cultures Beyond Postcolonialism [Internet]. New York: Routledge; 2014. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=1596887
24.
Gilbert H, Lo J. Performance and Cosmopolitics: Cross-Cultural Transactions in Australasia. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2007.
25.
Gilbert H, Lo J. Performance and Cosmopolitics: Cross-Cultural Transactions in Australasia. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan; 2008.
26.
Holledge J, Tompkins J. Women’s Intercultural Performance. London: Routledge; 2000.
27.
Knowles RP. Theatre & Interculturalism. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2010.
28.
Latrell C. After Appropriation. TDR (Cambridge, Mass) [Internet]. 2000;44(4). Available from: https://librarysearch.royalholloway.ac.uk/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=TN_gale_ofa68640730&indx=2&recIds=TN_gale_ofa68640730&recIdxs=1&elementId=1&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=&frbg=&&dscnt=0&scp.scps=scope%3A%2844ROY%29%2C44ROY_EbscoLocal%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&tb=t&mode=Basic&vid=44ROY_VU2&srt=rank&tab=tab1&dum=true&vl(freeText0)=After%20Appropriation&dstmp=1530872135269
29.
Marranca B, Dasgupta G. Interculturalism and Performance: Writings for PAJ. New York: PAJ; 1991.
30.
Martin J. The Intercultural Performance Handbook. London: Routledge; 2004.
31.
Meyer-Dinkgrafe D. Approaches to Acting in the Intercultural Paradigm. Approaches to Acting: Past and Present [Internet]. London: Continuum; 2001. p. 137–158. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=742985
32.
Pavis P. The Intercultural Performance Reader. London: Routledge; 1996.
33.
Shevtsova M. Interculturalism, Aestheticism, Orientalism: Starting From Peter Brook’s Mahabharata. Theatre Research International. 1997;22(02):98–104.
34.
Watson I. The Dynamics of Barter. Negotiating Cultures: Eugenio Barba and the Intercultural Debate. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 2002.
35.
Watson I. Performer Training: Developments Across Cultures. Australia: Harwood Academic; 2001.
36.
Wetmore KJ, Liu S, Mee EB. Modern Asian Theatre and Performance 1900-2000. London: Bloomsbury Methuen Drama; 2014.
37.
Wetmore KJ, Liu S, Mee EB. Modern Asian Theatre and Performance 1900-2000 [Internet]. London: Bloomsbury Methuen Drama; 2014. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=1645651
38.
Arnold N. The Barter Concept and Practices of Eugenio Barba’s Odin Theatre: Cultural Exchange or Cultural Colonialism? The European Legacy. 1996;1(3):1207–1212.
39.
Barba E, Fowler R. The Paper Canoe: A Guide to Theatre Anthropology. London: Routledge; 1995.
40.
Barba E. The Paper Canoe: A Guide to Theatre Anthropology [Internet]. London: Routledge; 1994. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=179536
41.
Barba E, Savarese N. A Dictionary of Theatre Anthropology: The Secret Art of the Performer. 2nd ed. London: Routledge; 2006.
42.
Barba E, Savarese N. A Dictionary of Theatre Anthropology: The Secret Art of the Performer [Internet]. 2nd ed. London: Routledge; 2006. Available from: https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=668433
43.
Rafolt L. Transcultural and Transcorporal Neighbors: Japanese Performance Utopias in Jerzy Grotowski, Eugenio Barba and Phillip B. Zarrilli. Colloquia Humanistica. 2015;(4):95–121.
44.
Watson I. Towards a Third Theatre: Eugenio Barba and the Odin Teatret. London: Routledge; 1993.
45.
Watson I. Training With Eugenio Barba: Acting Principles, the Pre- Expressive and ‘Personal Temperature’. Twentieth Century Actor Training. New York: Routledge; 2000.
46.
Watson I. Training With Eugenio Barba: Acting Principles, the Pre- Expressive and ‘Personal Temperature’. Twentieth Century Actor Training [Internet]. London: Routledge; 2000. Available from: http://ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.myilibrary.com?id=33513
47.
Watson I. The Dynamics of Barter. Negotiating Cultures: Eugenio Barba and the Intercultural Debate. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 2002.
48.
Brecht B, Sauerländer W, Brecht B. He Who Says Yes. London: Bloomsbury; 2014.
49.
Brecht B, Sauerländer W, Brecht B. He Who Says No [Internet]. London: Bloomsbury; 2014. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/
50.
Brecht B, Stern J, Stern T, Auden WH, Rorrison H. The Caucasian Chalk Circle. London: Methuen; 1984.
51.
Brecht B, Stern J, Stern T, Auden WH, Rorrison H. The Caucasian Chalk Circle. London: Methuen; 1984;
52.
Brecht B. Alienation Effects in Chinese Acting. Brecht on Theatre: The Development of an Aesthetic. London: Methuen; 1964.
53.
Onderdelinden S. Brecht and Asia. Theatre Intercontinental: Forms, Functions, Correspondences. Amsterdam: Rodofi; 1993.
54.
Guangrun R. Brecht’s Influence in China: A Chinese Perspective. Modern Drama [Internet]. 1999;42(2):247–252. Available from: https://librarysearch.royalholloway.ac.uk/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?frbrVersion=2&tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=TN_museS1712528699200097&indx=1&recIds=TN_museS1712528699200097&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=2&frbg=&&dscnt=0&scp.scps=scope%3A%2844ROY%29%2C44ROY_EbscoLocal%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&tb=t&mode=Basic&vid=44ROY_VU2&srt=rank&tab=tab1&dum=true&vl(freeText0)=Brecht%E2%80%99s%20influence%20in%20China%3A%20A%20Chinese%20Perspective&dstmp=1530875348128
55.
Tatlow A, Wong TW. Brecht and East Asian Theatre: The Proceedings of a Conference on Brecht in East Asian Theatre. [Hong Kong]: Hong Kong University Press; 1982.
56.
Tian M. The Poetics of Difference and Displacement: Twentieth-Century Chinese-Western Intercultural Theatre. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press; 2008.
57.
Bharucha R. Theatre and the World: Performance and the Politics of Culture. [Rev. ed.]. London: Routledge; 1993.
58.
Bharucha R. Theatre and the World: Performance and the Politics of Culture [Internet]. London: Routledge; 1993. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=179242
59.
Brook P. The Empty Space. Penguin; 1990.
60.
Brook P. The Culture of Links. The Intercultural Performance Reader. London: Routledge; 1996.
61.
Brook P, Kalb J. The Mahabharata Twenty-Five Years Later. PAJ: A Journal of Performance and Art. 2010;32(3):63–71.
62.
Moody D. Peter Brook’s Heart of Light: ‘Primitivism’ and Intercultural Theatre. New Theatre Quarterly. 1995;11(41):33–39.
63.
Banu G. The Absent Presence. The Intercultural Performance Reader. London: Routledge; 1996.
64.
Grotowski J, Barba E. Towards a Poor Theatre. London: Methuen; 1969.
65.
Grotowski J. Around Theatre: The Orient – The Occident. The Intercultural Performance Reader. London: Routledge; 1996.
66.
Rafolt L. Transcultural and Transcorporal Neighbors: Japanese Performance Utopias in Jerzy Grotowski, Eugenio Barba and Phillip B. Zarrilli. Colloquia Humanistica. 2015;(4):95–121.
67.
Richie D. Asian Theatre and Grotowski. The Grotowski Sourcebook. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul; 1997.
68.
Wolford L. Grotowski’s Vision of the Actor: The Search for Contact. Twentieth Century Actor Training. New York: Routledge; 2000.
69.
Wolford L. Grotowski’s Vision of the Actor: The Search for Contact. Twentieth Century Actor Training [Internet]. London: Routledge; 2000. Available from: http://ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.myilibrary.com?id=33513
70.
Yarrow R. Animating the Intercultural: Revisiting Peter Brook’s Practice and the Somatics of Performance. Indian Theatre Journal. 2017;1(2):147–156.
71.
Mitra R. Akram Khan: Dancing New Interculturalism. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan; 2015.
72.
Norridge Z. Dancing the Multicultural Conversation? Critical Responses to Akram Khan’s Work in the Context of Pluralist Poetics. Forum for Modern Language Studies. 2010;46(4):415–430.
73.
Kiernander A. Ariane Mnouchkine and the Théâtre du Soleil. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1993.
74.
Miller JG. Ariane Mnouchkine. New York: Routledge; 2007.
75.
Miller JG. Ariane Mnouchkine [Internet]. London: Routledge; 2007. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=308538
76.
Mnouchkine A. The Theatre is Oriental. The Intercultural Performance Reader. London: Routledge; 1996.
77.
Singleton B. Receiving Les Atrides Productively: Mnouchkine’s Intercultural Signs as Intertexts. Theatre Research International. 1997;22(1):19–23.
78.
Braun E. Meyerhold: A Revolution in Theatre. 2nd ed., rev.exp. London: Methuen; 1995.
79.
Meierkhold VE, Braun E. Meyerhold on Theatre. Rev. ed. London: Methuen Drama; 1998.
80.
Pitches J. Vsevolod Meyerhold. London: Routledge; 2003.
81.
Tian M. Meyerhold Meets Mei Lanfang: Staging the Grotesque and the Beautiful. Comparative Drama. 1999;33(2):234–269.
82.
Tian M. Authenticity and Usability, or "Welding the Unweldable”: Meyerhold’s Refraction of Japanese Theatre. Asian Theatre Journal. 2016;33(2):310–346.
83.
Barnes P. Working With Yukio Ninagawa. New Theatre Quarterly. 1992;8(32):389–391.
84.
Borlik TA. A Season in Intercultural Limbo: Ninagawa Yukio’s Doctor Faustus, Theatre Cocoon, Tokyo. Shakespeare Quarterly. 2011;62(3):444–456.
85.
Im Y. The Pitfalls of Intercultural Discourse: The Case of Yukio Ninagaawa. Shakespeare Bulletin: A Journal of Performance Criticism and Scholarship [Internet]. 2004;22(4):7–30. Available from: https://librarysearch.royalholloway.ac.uk/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?frbrVersion=3&tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=TN_mla2004583487&indx=1&recIds=TN_mla2004583487&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=3&frbg=&&dscnt=0&scp.scps=scope%3A%2844ROY%29%2C44ROY_EbscoLocal%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&tb=t&mode=Basic&vid=44ROY_VU2&srt=rank&tab=tab1&dum=true&vl(freeText0)=The%20Pitfalls%20of%20Intercultural%20Discourse%3A%20The%20Case%20of%20Yukio%20%20Ninagawa&dstmp=1531125528885
86.
Trivedi P, Minami R. Re-playing Shakespeare in Asia. New York: Routledge; 2010.
87.
Trivedi P, Minami R. Re-playing Shakespeare in Asia [Internet]. New York: Routledge; 2010. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=465399
88.
Bharucha R. Foreign Asia / Foreign Shakespeare: Dissenting Notes on New Asian Interculturality, Postcoloniality, and Recolonization. Theatre Journal. 2004;56(1):1–28.
89.
Grehan H. Theatre Works’ Desdemona: Fusing Technology and Tradition. TDR/The Drama Review. 2001;45(3):113–125.
90.
Lan YL. Ong Keng Sen’s Desdemona, Ugliness, and the Intercultural Performative. Theatre Journal. 2004;56(2):251–273.
91.
Sen OK. Encounters. TDR/The Drama Review. 2001;45(3):126–133.
92.
Sen OK. The New Chinoiserie. Theater. 2007;37(1):55–68.
93.
Peterson W. Consuming the Asian Other in Singapore: Interculturalism in Theatreworks’ Desdemona. Theatre Research International. 2003;28(1):79–95.
94.
Holmberg A. The Theatre of Robert Wilson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1996.
95.
Marranca B, Foreman R, Wilson R, Breuer L. Theatre of Images. New ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1996.
96.
Weiler C. Japanese Traces in Robert Wilson’s Productions. The Intercultural Performance Reader. London: Routledge; 1996.
97.
Rafolt L. Transcultural and Transcorporal Neighbors: Japanese Performance Utopias in Jerzy Grotowski, Eugenio Barba and Phillip B. Zarrilli. Colloquia Humanistica. 2015;(4):95–121.
98.
Zarrilli PB. Psychophysical Acting: An Intercultural Approach After Stanislavski. London: Routledge; 2009.
99.
Zarrilli PB, Hulton P. Psychophysical Acting: An Intercultural Approach After Stanislavski [Internet]. London: Routledge; 2009. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=1047000
100.
Arlington LC. The Chinese Drama: From the Earliest Times Until Today. Shanghai: Kelly and Walsh; 1930.
101.
Bonds AB. Beijing Opera Costumes: The Visual Communication of Character and Culture. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press; 2008.
102.
Brusák K. Signs in the Chinese Theater. Semiotics of Art: Prague School Contributions. Cambridge, Mass: MIT; 1976.
103.
Chang D, Mitchell JD, Yeu R. How the Chinese Actor Trains: Interviews with Two Peking Opera Performers. Educational Theatre Journal [Internet]. 1974;26:183–91. Available from: https://librarysearch.royalholloway.ac.uk/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=TN_mla1975213774&indx=1&recIds=TN_mla1975213774&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=&frbg=&&dscnt=0&scp.scps=scope%3A%2844ROY%29%2C44ROY_EbscoLocal%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&tb=t&mode=Basic&vid=44ROY_VU2&srt=rank&tab=tab1&dum=true&vl(freeText0)=How%20the%20Chinese%20Actor%20Trains%3A%20Interviews%20%20with%20Two%20Peking%20Opera%20Performers&dstmp=1531128010854
104.
Fei FC. Chinese Theories of Theater and Performance From Confucius to the Present. Ann Arbor, Mich: University of Michigan Press; 1999.
105.
Fei FC, Sun WH. Othello and Beijing Opera: Appropriation as a Two-Way Street. TDR/The Drama Review. 2006;50(1):120–133.
106.
Crump JI, Malm WP. Chinese and Japanese Music-Dramas. Ann Arbor: Center for Chinese Studies, University of Michigan; 1975.
107.
Dolby W. A History of Chinese Drama. London: Elek; 1976.
108.
Duchesne I. The Chinese Opera Star: Roles and Identity. Boundaries in China [Internet]. London: Reaktion; 1994. Available from: https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=475105
109.
Evans M. "Brand China” on the World Stage: Jingju, the Olympics, and Globalization. TDR/The Drama Review. 2012;56(2):113–130.
110.
Goldstein J. Drama Kings: Players and Publics in the Re-Creation of Peking Opera, 1870-1937. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2007.
111.
Halson E. Peking Opera: A Short Guide. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press; 1966.
112.
Hsu TC. The Chinese Conception of the Theatre. Seattle: University of Washington Press; 1985.
113.
Lei DPW. Alternative Chinese Opera in the Age of Globalization: Performing Zero. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2011.
114.
Li R. The Soul of Beijing Opera: Theatrical Creativity and Continuity in the Changing World. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press; 2010.
115.
Li R. The Soul of Beijing Opera: Theatrical Creativity and Continuity in the Changing World [Internet]. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press; 2010. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=677455
116.
Li SL. Cross-Dressing in Chinese Opera. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press; 2006.
117.
Li S. Cross-Dressing in Chinese Opera [Internet]. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press; 2003. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=677456
118.
Ma Q. Women in Traditional Chinese Theater: The Heroine’s Play. Lanham, Md: University Press of America; 2005.
119.
Mackerras C. The Rise of the Peking Opera, 1770-1870: Social Aspects of the Theatre in Manchu China. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1972.
120.
Mackerras C. Chinese Theater: From Its Origins to the Present Day. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press; 1983.
121.
Min T. Male Dan: The Paradox of Sex, Acting, and Perception in Traditional Chinese Theatre. Asian Theatre Journal. 2000;17(1):78–97.
122.
Tian M. The Poetics of Difference and Displacement: Twentieth-Century Chinese-Western Intercultural Theatre. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press; 2008.
123.
Plowright PS. Mediums, Puppets, and the Human Actor in the Theatres of the East. Lewiston, N.Y.: E. Mellen Press; 2002.
124.
Riley J. Chinese Theatre and the Actor in Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1997.
125.
Scott AC. The Classical Theatre of China. Allen & Unwin; 1957.
126.
Scott AC. Traditional Chinese Plays: Volume 1. Univ.Wisconsin P.; 1970.
127.
Scott AC. Traditional Chinese Plays: Volume 2. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press; 1969.
128.
Scott AC. Traditional Chinese Plays: Volume 3. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press; 1975.
129.
Scott AC. Actors Are Madmen: Notebook of a Theatregoer in China. Madison, Wis: University of Wisconsin Press; 1982.
130.
Shen G. Chinese Chuanqi Opera in English: Directing The West Wing With Modern Music. Asian Theatre Journal. 2012;29(1):183–205.
131.
Sun H, Sun W. Performing Arts and Cultural Identity in the Era of Interculturalism. TDR/The Drama Review. 2009;53(2):7–11.
132.
Thorpe A. The Role of the Chou (‘Clown’) in Traditional Chinese Drama: Comedy, Criticism, and Cosmology on the Chinese Stage. Lewiston: Edwin Mellen Press; 2007.
133.
Thorpe A. Transforming Tradition: Performances of Jingju (‘Beijing Opera’) in the Uk. Theatre Research International. 2011;36(1):33–46.
134.
Thorpe A. Style, Experimentation and Jingju (Beijing Opera) as a Decentred Multiplicity. Studies in Theatre and Performance. 2011;31(3):275–291.
135.
Wichmann E. Listening to Theatre: The Aural Dimension of Beijing Opera. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press; 1991.
136.
Wichmann E. Tradition and Innovation in Contemporary Beijing Opera Performance. TDR (1988-). 1990;34(1):146–178.
137.
Wichmann-Walczak E. "Reform” at the Shanghai Jingju Company and Its Impact on Creative Authority and Repertory. TDR/The Drama Review. 2000;44(4):96–119.
138.
Wichmann-Walczak E. Jingju (Beijing/Peking ’Opera’) as International Art and as Transnational Root of Cultural Identification. Diasporas and Interculturalism in Asian Performing Arts: Translating Traditions. London: RoutledgeCurzon; 2005.
139.
Yan H. Theatricality in Classical Chinese Drama. Theatricality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2003.
140.
Zung CSL. Secrets of the Chinese Drama: A Complete Explanatory Guide to Actions and Symbols as Seen in the Performance of Chinese Dramas. Shanghai: Kelly and Walsh; 1937.
141.
Albright D. Pound, Yeats, and the Noh Theater. Iowa Review [Internet]. 1985;15(2):34–50. Available from: https://librarysearch.royalholloway.ac.uk/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=TN_jstor_archive_520156175&indx=2&recIds=TN_jstor_archive_520156175&recIdxs=1&elementId=1&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=&frbg=&&dscnt=0&scp.scps=scope%3A%2844ROY%29%2C44ROY_EbscoLocal%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&tb=t&vid=44ROY_VU2&mode=Basic&srt=rank&tab=tab1&dum=true&vl(freeText0)=Pound%2C%20Yeats%2C%20and%20the%20Noh%20Theater&dstmp=1531211654016
142.
Alter MP. Bertolt Brecht and the Noh Drama. Modern Drama [Internet]. 1968;11:122–131. Available from: https://librarysearch.royalholloway.ac.uk/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=TN_mla1968118897&indx=1&recIds=TN_mla1968118897&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=&frbg=&&dscnt=0&scp.scps=scope%3A%2844ROY%29%2C44ROY_EbscoLocal%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&tb=t&mode=Basic&vid=44ROY_VU2&srt=rank&tab=tab1&dum=true&vl(freeText0)=Bertolt%20Brecht%20and%20the%20Noh%20Drama&dstmp=1531212036003
143.
Anno M, Halebsky J. Innovation in Nō: Matsui Akira Continues a Tradition of Change. Asian Theatre Journal. 2014;31(1):126–152.
144.
Acting Techniques of the Noh Classical Theatre of Japan. Ann Arbor: Instructional Media Center, Michigan State University; 1980.
145.
Arcari J. Treasuring the Secret Within: Grotowski and the Flower. Theatre, Dance and Performance Training. 2010;1(1):4–21.
146.
Bethe M. Dance in the No Theater: 1. Cornell Univ East Asia Program East Asia Series; 1982.
147.
Bethe M, Brazell K. The Practice of Noh Theatre. By Means of Performance: Intercultural Studies of Theatre and Ritual. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1990.
148.
Brazell K, Araki JT. Traditional Japanese Theater: An Anthology of Plays. New York: Columbia University Press; 1998.
149.
Brandon JR. Nô and Kyôgen in the Contemporary World. Honolulu, Hawaii: University of Hawai’i Press; 1997.
150.
Coldiron M. Trance and Transformation of the Actor in Japanese Noh and Balinese Masked Dance-Drama. Lewiston, NY: E. Mellen; 2004.
151.
Maruoka D, Yoshikoshi T. Noh. Osaka: Hoikusha; 1969.
152.
Ernst E. The Influence of Japanese Theatrical Style on Western Theatre. Educational Theatre Journal. 1969;21(2):127–138.
153.
Griffiths D. The Training of Noh Actors and the Dove. Harwood Academic Publrs; 1998.
154.
Hare TB. Zeami’s Style: The Noh Plays of Zeami Motokiyo. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press; 1986.
155.
Horie-Webber A. Japanese Theatre and the West. London: Harwood; 1994.
156.
Ikegami E. The Taming of the Samurai: Honorific Individualism and the Making of Modern Japan. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press; 1995.
157.
Immoos T, Mayer F. Japanese Theatre. New York: Rizzoli; 1977.
158.
Keene D. No; and, Bunraku: Two Forms of Japanese Theatre. New York: Columbia University Press; 1990.
159.
Konparu K. The Noh Theater: Principles and Perspectives. New York: Weatherhill/Tankosha; 1983.
160.
Leiter SL, Ortolani B. Zeami and the No Theatre in the World. New York: Center for Advanced Studies in Theatre Arts; 1998.
161.
Sugawara M, Sabin B. Lives of Master Swordsmen. Toky: The East Publications; 1996.
162.
Matsui A, Hughes D, Emmert R. Inside Noh: 1-2. S.l.: BBC Radio Off-air; 1991.
163.
McDonald KI. Japanese Classical Theater in Films. Rutherford: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press; 1993.
164.
Ortolani B. The Japanese Theatre: From Shamanistic Ritual to Contemporary Pluralism. Rev. ed. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press; 1995.
165.
Quinn SF. Developing Zeami: The Noh Actor’s Attunement in Practice. Honolulu, Hawaii: University of Hawaii Press; 2005.
166.
Scholz-Cionca S, Leiter SL. Japanese Theatre and the International Stage. Leiden: Brill; 2001.
167.
Sekine M, Murray C. Yeats and the Noh: A Comparative Study. Gerrards Cross: Smythe; 1990.
168.
Smethurst MJ. The Artistry of Aeschylus and Zeami: A Comparative Study of Greek Tragedy and Nō. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press; 1988.
169.
Thorpe A. How Can Westerners Study Japanese Noh? an Interview With Richard Emmert, Director of the Noh Training Project and Theatre Nohgaku. Theatre, Dance and Performance Training. 2014;5(3):321–333.
170.
Nogami T. Japanese Noh Plays: How to See Them. Tokyo: Board of Tourist Industry, Japanese Government Railways; 1934.
171.
Tyler R. Japanese No dramas. London: Penguin; 1992.
172.
Umewaka N. The Inner World of The No. Contemporary Theatre Review. 1994;1(2):29–38.
173.
Varley HP. Japanese Culture. 4th Edition. Honolulu: University of Hawaiʻi Press; 2000.
174.
Yamanaka R. Expressive Style in Noh: Monologue, Memory and Movement. Expressions of the Invisible: A Comparative Study of Noh and Other Theatrical Traditions. Tokyo: The Nogami Memorial Noh theatre Research Institure of Hosei University; 2015.
175.
Zeami M. On the Art of the No Drama: The Major Treatises of Zeami. Masakazu Y, Rimer JT, editors. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press; 1984.
176.
Hare TB, Zeami M. Zeami: Performance Notes. New York: Columbia University Press; 2008.