1.
Steele J. Tort Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Third edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2014.
2.
Rose FD. Blackstone’s Statutes on Contract, Tort & Restitution, 2016-2017. Vol. Blackstone’s Statutes. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2016.
3.
Lunney M, Nolan D, Oliphant K. Tort law: text and materials. Sixth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2017.
4.
Giliker P. Tort. Fifth edition. Vol. Sweet&Maxwell’s textbook series. London: Sweet & Maxwell; 2014.
5.
Winfield PH. Winfield and Jolowicz on Tort. Nineteenth edition. London: Sweet & Maxwell; 2014.
6.
Horsey K, Rackley E. Kidner’s casebook on torts. Thirteenth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015.
7.
Clerk JF, Lindsell WHB. Clerk & Lindsell on Torts. Twenty-first edition. Jones MA, Dugdale AM, editors. London: Sweet & Maxwell; 2014.
8.
Deakin SF, Johnston AC, Markesinis B. Markesinis and Deakin’s Tort Law. Seventh edition. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 2013.
9.
The Cambridge Law Journal. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/journal/camblawj
10.
Journal of Personal Injury Law. Available from: https://uk.westlaw.com/WestlawUk/Journals/Publications/Journal-of-Personal-Injury-Law?navId=D5B4D13168397CD7E852478A23C44CF9
11.
Law Quarterly Review. Available from: https://uk.westlaw.com/WestlawUk/Journals/Publications/Law-Quarterly-Review?navId=9165ED7940A95749AD079779C529E71A
12.
Legal Studies. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1748-121X
13.
Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/journal/oxfojlegastud
14.
Modern Law Review. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/journal/modernlawreview
15.
Tort Law Review [open access]. Available from: http://sites.thomsonreuters.com.au/journals/category/tort-law-review/
16.
Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (APIL) [Internet]. Available from: https://www.apil.org.uk/
17.
Blog | APIL [Internet]. Available from: https://www.apil.org.uk/blog
18.
UK Human Rights Blog [Internet]. Available from: https://ukhumanrightsblog.com/
19.
British and Irish Legal Information Institute [Internet]. Available from: http://www.bailii.org/
20.
The Law Commission [Internet]. Available from: http://www.lawcom.gov.uk/
21.
Halsbury’s Law Exchange [Internet]. Available from: http://www.halsburyslawexchange.co.uk/
22.
Inner Temple Library [Internet]. Available from: https://web.archive.org/web/20230202120724/http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/
23.
Steele J. Tort Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Third edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2014.
24.
Lewis R, Morris A. Tort Law Culture in the United Kingdom: Image and Reality in Personal Injury Compensation [open access]. Journal of European Tort Law [Internet]. 2012;3(2). Available from: http://orca.cf.ac.uk/26836/1/SSRNCulturesJuly2012.pdf
25.
Williams K. Compensating Tragedy. The New Law Journal [Internet]. 2007;157(7300). Available from: https://plus-lexis-com.royalholloway.idm.oclc.org/api/permalink/7972f86b-ae2e-42a5-81c0-f971d5d5ef6c/?context=1001073
26.
Steele J, Cowan DS. The Negligent Pursuit of Public Duty - a Police Immunity? Osman v Ferguson [1993] 4 All ER 344. Public Law. 1994;(Spring).
27.
Van Colle v Chief Constable of Hertfordshire Police [2008] 3 All ER 977 [Internet]. Available from: https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/ID4F993F05EC411DDAB7DC9767090C799/View/FullText.html
28.
Nolan D. Negligence and Human Rights Law: The Case for Separate Development. The Modern Law Review. 2013;76(2):286–318.
29.
Nolan D. New Forms of Damage in Negligence. The Modern Law Review [Internet]. 2007;70(1):59–88. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4123354
30.
Goldberg JCP. Twentieth-Century Tort Theory. Georgetown Law Journal. 91(3):513–84.
31.
Rudden B. Torticles. Tulane Civil Law Forum. 1992;(6/7):105–30.
32.
Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (APIL) [Internet]. Available from: https://www.apil.org.uk/
33.
The American Museum of Tort Law [Internet]. Available from: https://www.tortmuseum.org/
34.
Steele J. Tort Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Third edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2014.
35.
Priel D. Tort Law for Cynics. The Modern Law Review. 2014;77(5):703–31.
36.
Witting C. Duty of Care: An Analytical Approach. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies [Internet]. 2005;25(1):33–63. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3600600
37.
Vines P. The Needle in the Haystack: Principle in the Duty of Care in Negligence. University of New South Wales Law Journal. 2000;23(2):35–57.
38.
Witting CA. Street on Torts. Fourteenth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015.
39.
Williams K. Res Ipsa Loquiture Still Speaks [open access]. Law Quarterly Review [Internet]. 2009;125:567–70. Available from: http://shura.shu.ac.uk/1021/2/Res_ispsa_loquitur_still_speaks.pdf
40.
Nolan D. Varying the Standard of Care in Negligence. The Cambridge Law Journal [Internet]. 2013;72(3):651–88. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/24694081
41.
Campbell M. Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board. Common Law World Review. 2015;44(3):222–8.
42.
Steele J. Tort Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Third edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2014.
43.
Laleng P. Sienkiewicz v Greif (UK) Ltd and Willmore v Knowsley Metropolitan Borough Council: A Material Contribution to Uncertainty? The Modern Law Review. 2011;74(5):777–93.
44.
Hamer D. ‘Factual Causation’ and ‘Scope of Liability’: What’s the Difference? The Modern Law Review. 2014;77(2):155–88.
45.
Steel S. Causation in English Tort Law: Still Wrong after all These Years’. University of Queensland Law Journal [Internet]. 2012;31(2):243–64. Available from: https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A321335736/AONE?u=rho_ttda&sid=bookmark-AONE&xid=bc31d222
46.
An Overview of Negligently Inflicted Asbestos Related Conditions. Journal of Personal Injury Law [Internet]. 2011;205. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=i0ad69f8e0000015a1d2331cffc672957&docguid=IA905BF501CB511E18769A231D01EF25E&hitguid=IA905BF501CB511E18769A231D01EF25E&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=1&crumb-action=append&context=50&resolvein=true
47.
Bailey SH. Causation in Negligence: What Is a Material Contribution? Legal Studies. 2010;30(2):167–85.
48.
Smith J. Causation: The Search for Principle. Journal of Personal Injury Law [Internet]. 2009;101. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=i0ad629030000015a1d278d9ed8fafd1c&docguid=I221C1DF157C711DEA9F1C6A38674490E&hitguid=I221C1DF157C711DEA9F1C6A38674490E&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=1&crumb-action=append&context=55&resolvein=true
49.
Morgan J. Lost Causes in the House of Lords: Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services. Modern Law Review. 2003;66(2):277–84.
50.
Stauch M. Risk and Remoteness of Damage in Negligence. Modern Law Review. 2001;64(2):191–214.
51.
Steele J. Tort Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Third edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2014.
52.
Goudkamp J, Zou M. The Defence of Illegality in Tort Law: Beyond Judicial Redemption? The Cambridge Law Journal. 2015;74(01):13–6.
53.
Neyers JW. A Theory of Vicarious Liability. Alberta Law Review [Internet]. 2005;43(2):287–326. Available from: https://librarysearch.royalholloway.ac.uk/permalink/44ROY_INST/1h5nr1h/cdi_crossref_primary_10_29173_alr1254
54.
Weir T. All or Nothing. Tulane Law Review. 2004;78(3):511–52.
55.
Hershovitz S. Harry Potter And the Trouble with Tort Theory. Stanford Law Review [Internet]. 2010;63(1):67–114. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41105395
56.
Steele J. Tort Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Third edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2014.
57.
‘Liability for Psychiatric Illness’ in LC249 Part IX: Summary of Recommendations | Law Commission [Internet]. 1995. Available from: https://www.lawcom.gov.uk/project/liability-for-psychiatric-illness/
58.
Now You See It, Now You Don’t: Black Letter Reflections on the Legacies of White v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police. Tort Law Review, The (Tort L Rev) [Internet]. 2010; Available from: http://sites.thomsonreuters.com.au/journals/category/tort-law-review/
59.
Negligence and Damages Bill | Parliament [Internet]. Available from: https://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/bills/cbill/2015-2016/0076/cbill_2015-20160076_en_1.htm
60.
Bailey S, Nolan D. The Page v. Smith Saga: A Tale of Inauspicious Origins and Unintended Consequences. The Cambridge Law Journal [Internet]. 2010;69(3):495–528. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40962713
61.
Handford P. Psychiatric Injury in Breach of a Relationship. Legal Studies [Internet]. 2007;27(1):26–50. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1748-121X.2006.00034.x
62.
Teff H. Liability for Negligently Inflicted Psychiatric Harm: Justifications and Boundaries. The Cambridge Law Journal [Internet]. 1998;57(1):91–122. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4508422
63.
Teff H. Liability for Psychiatric Illness after Hillsborough. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies [Internet]. 1992;12(3):440–52. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/764777
64.
‘Liability for Psychiatric Illness’ in LC249 Part IX: Summary of Recommendations | Law Commission [Internet]. 1995. Available from: https://www.lawcom.gov.uk/project/liability-for-psychiatric-illness/
65.
Steele J. Tort Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Third edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2014.
66.
Stapleton J. Comparative Economic Loss: Lessons from Case-Law-Focused ‘Middle Theory’. UCLA Law Review [Internet]. 2002;50(2):531–84. Available from: https://advance.lexis.com/document/?pdmfid=1519360&crid=3fd6c69c-7ab6-4cdf-8e79-fac989da091c&pddocfullpath=%2Fshared%2Fdocument%2Fanalytical-materials%2Furn%3AcontentItem%3A47ST-TXV0-00CV-608G-00000-00&pdcontentcomponentid=7359&pdteaserkey=sr0&pditab=allpods&ecomp=hwmyk&earg=sr0&prid=9866f253-0989-487b-9d8d-4fd82158bbbf
67.
Mitchell P, Mitchell C. Negligence Liability for Pure Economic Loss. Law Quarterly Review [Internet]. 2005;121. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=i0ad832f20000015a191dc53bc223c4ba&docguid=ICC8C8870E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&hitguid=ICC8C8870E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&rank=3&spos=3&epos=3&td=3&crumb-action=append&context=36&resolvein=true
68.
Giliker P. Revisiting Pure Economic Loss: Lessons to Be Learnt From the Supreme Court of Canada? Legal Studies [Internet]. 2005;25(1):49–71. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1748-121X.2005.tb00270.x
69.
Steele J. Tort Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Third edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2014.
70.
Bennett L. Judges, Child Trespassers and Occupiers’ Liability. International Journal of Law in the Built Environment [Internet]. 2011;3(2):126–45. Available from: https://plus-lexis-com.royalholloway.idm.oclc.org/api/permalink/c47cf3e8-9b74-4939-8403-e2df3fca0811/?context=1001073
71.
Thompson L. The 2006 Tour of Britain Cycle Race - an Analysis of the Management of Participant and Spectator Safety [open access]. Laws of the Game [Internet]. 2015;1(1):1–14. Available from: https://web.archive.org/web/20211207202902/http://journals.staffs.ac.uk/index.php/lotg/article/download/81/175
72.
Steele J. Tort Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Third edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2014.
73.
Cox v Ministry of Justice UKSC 10 [Internet]. 2016. Available from: https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uksc-2014-0089-judgment.pdf
74.
Mohamud v WM Morrison Supermarkets plc UKSC 11 [Internet]. Mohamud v Wm Morrison Supermarkets Plc. 2016. Available from: https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uksc-2014-0087-judgment.pdf
75.
Giliker P. Lister Revisited: Vicarious Liability, Distributive Justice and the Course of Employment. Law Quarterly Review [Internet]. 2010; Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=i0ad69f8e0000015a1ce256554e89ed39&docguid=I07569312C2CE11DFA880E34515B10C27&hitguid=I07569312C2CE11DFA880E34515B10C27&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=1&crumb-action=append&context=2&resolvein=true
76.
Morgan P. Certainty in Vicarious Liability: A Quest for a Chimaera? The Cambridge Law Journal. 2016;75(2):202–5.
77.
Morgan J. Liability for Independent Contractors in Contract and Tort: Duties to Ensure That Care Is Taken. The Cambridge Law Journal. 2015;74(1):109–39.
78.
George R. Non-Delegable Duties of Care in Tort. The Law Quarterly Review [Internet]. 2014;130(October):534–8. Available from: http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=http%3A%2F%2Fidp.rhul.ac.uk%2Foala&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI2083D2C0342211E499A193CC737971DF%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
79.
Morgan P. Vicarious Liability on the Move. Law Quarterly Review [Internet]. 2013;129(April):139–44. Available from: http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=http%3A%2F%2Fidp.rhul.ac.uk%2Foala&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI6972C970881411E2BACCBED531DFD77E%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
80.
Hope D. Tailoring the Law on Vicarious Liability [Internet]. 2013. p. 1–20. Available from: https://www.supremecourt.uk/docs/speech-130423.pdf
81.
Brodie D. Enterprise Liability: Justifying Vicarious Liability. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies [Internet]. 2007;27(3):493–508. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4494596